Pre-assembled drainage units utilizing aggregates of drainage beads.
In the past, traditional drainage systems (such as for foundation drains, septic drainage fields, and other applications) have employed gravel aggregate and, optionally, a perforated pipe or pipes surrounded by the gravel aggregate. The gravel provides structure and void volume to the drainage system.
More recently, pre-assembled drainage units utilizing a geosynthetic aggregate surrounded by a perforated sleeve have been utilized instead of gravel aggregate. U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,123 shows examples of pre-assembled drainage units. One type described includes a length of perforated distribution pipe surrounded by a volume of loose lightweight pieces of plastic aggregate bounded by a perforated sleeve. Another type does not include the pipe, just the plastic aggregate bounded by the perforated sleeve.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,996 describes improved geosynthetic drainage beads for use as an aggregate in pre-assembled drainage units. The drainage bead described in this patent includes a central portion with several legs and ribs extending therefrom, the legs defining channels therebetween. The legs and ribs of the drainage bead help to maintain void volume in the drainage unit. This patent emphasizes that the legs should be wider than the channels, to prevent the beads from interlocking with one another. Additionally, this patent emphasizes that the central portion of the bead should be relatively thick, in order to maximize strength.
As with the gravel aggregate, the geosynthetic aggregates described in these two patents provide structure and void volume for the drainage systems.
Current practices limit the ability of the manufacturer to maximize the specific gravity and void volume of the drainage beads at a specified bulk density. Specific gravity may be used as one indicator of the compressive strength of the drainage beads (e.g. resistance to the compressive forces typically encountered in drainage systems), whereas void volume may be used as one indicator of performance of the drainage system (i.e. fluid holding capacity). Current practices use bulk density as the primary mechanism for controlling specific gravity. Raising bulk density, however, typically requires increasing manufacturing cost, since higher bulk density means a greater amount of raw materials will be required to produce the drainage unit.
Applicants have developed enhanced drainage bead geometries that provide for increased specific gravity and void volume of the bead at a specified bulk density. Applicants have also discovered that this increased performance can be provided without sacrificing structural strength of the drainage bead. Examples of such optimized drainage bead geometries are described below. These optimized geometries facilitate the production of pre-assembled drainage units having relatively high compressive strength and fluid holding capacity at a relatively low cost.
The drainage bead 10 of
As discussed above, drainage beads of the present invention feature optimized geometries that promote relatively high specific gravities and void volumes at a specified bulk density. Non-limiting examples of these optimized geometries are discussed below in context of the drainage bead 10 of
The following table illustrates certain average dimensions, geometries, ratios and other characteristics of drainage bead 10 and various prior art drainage beads:
One of skill in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to drainage beads having any particular dimension or geometry, and that drainage beads having different dimensions and geometries are possible and within the scope of the present invention. For instance, without limitation, in some embodiments the drainage bead may have dimensions such that the ratio of perimeter to total area may be another number that is greater than eight (or in some embodiments, 7.7), such that the ratio of leg length to spine width may be another number that is greater than 0.8 (or in some embodiments, 0.75), or such that the ratio of leg length to leg width may be another number that is greater than 1.4 (or in some embodiments, 1.35). In these or other embodiments, other dimensions and ratios may also be used to characterize the present invention. One of skill in the art will also recognize that the dimensions of a drainage bead, or average dimensions of a drainage bead, can be determined using techniques other than those specifically identified above and illustrated in
In some embodiments, the drainage bead may have dimensions such that the ratio of the arm length (e.g. arm length 36 shown in
As mentioned above, in at least some embodiments, drainage beads of the present invention may be formed through an extrusion process. In some embodiments, polystyrene pellets (e.g. recycled polystyrene pellets) are introduced into an extrusion apparatus in which they are melted and mixed with a blowing agent such as pentane gas. The melted polystyrene is extruded through a die, passed through a cooling bath, and is subsequently cut into un-expanded beads. The beads may be packaged and shipped in an un-expanded form.
The die aperture 60 of
In some embodiments, un-expanded drainage beads may be expanded into expanded drainage beads using a multi-pass expansion process in which the beads are subjected to high temperature steam. In one non-limiting example, the drainage beads are subjected to a first pass in which the beads are subjected to steam at a suitable temperature for a suitable time in order to increase the bulk density of the beads from approximately 22 to 25 pounds per cubic foot to approximately 0.9 pounds per cubic foot and a second pass in which the beads are subjected to steam at a suitable temperature for a suitable time in order to increase the bulk density of the partially expanded beads to approximately 0.5 pounds per cubic foot.
In some embodiments, once expanded, an aggregate of expanded drainage beads may be put into a pre-assembled drainage unit, such as the pre-assembled drainage unit 64 illustrated in
One of skill in the art will recognized that changes may be made to the above-described non-limiting embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention.
This patent application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Application No. 61/486,020, filed May 13, 2011 for a “Drain Bead,” the entire contents of which are incorporated by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3104085 | Skladany | Sep 1963 | A |
3167600 | Worman | Jan 1965 | A |
3188264 | Holden | Jun 1965 | A |
3233414 | Hansen, Jr. et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3334798 | Pezely, Jr. et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3679531 | Wienand et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4077154 | Muller | Mar 1978 | A |
4166875 | Bussey, Jr. | Sep 1979 | A |
D255220 | Bussey, Jr. | Jun 1980 | S |
D255661 | Atkins | Jul 1980 | S |
D255875 | Atkins | Jul 1980 | S |
4215166 | Bussey, Jr. | Jul 1980 | A |
4234657 | Bussey, Jr. | Nov 1980 | A |
D258267 | Atkins | Feb 1981 | S |
4261940 | Bussey, Jr. | Apr 1981 | A |
4269895 | Borchert et al. | May 1981 | A |
4411555 | Minvielle et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4474505 | Minvielle et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4500586 | Bussey, Jr. | Feb 1985 | A |
4514453 | Bussey | Apr 1985 | A |
4606965 | Bussey | Aug 1986 | A |
4983068 | Kozak et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990116 | Chen | Feb 1991 | A |
5015123 | Houck et al. | May 1991 | A |
5028470 | Reichenecker | Jul 1991 | A |
D319392 | Ring | Aug 1991 | S |
5051028 | Houck et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5061218 | Garage et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069647 | Zuviria | Dec 1991 | A |
5151312 | Boeri | Sep 1992 | A |
5154543 | Houck et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160785 | Davidson, Jr. | Nov 1992 | A |
5188880 | Tether | Feb 1993 | A |
5215490 | Szoradi | Jun 1993 | A |
5254389 | Tether | Oct 1993 | A |
5267863 | Simmons, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
5378357 | Houck et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5468556 | Fuss et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482491 | Kichijyo | Jan 1996 | A |
5515975 | Jarvis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535499 | Houck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5595458 | Grabhorn | Jan 1997 | A |
5639364 | Houck et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657527 | Houck et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5713696 | Horvath et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5770138 | Yoder | Jun 1998 | A |
5788423 | Perkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5871384 | Kichijo | Feb 1999 | A |
5928052 | Buscher | Jul 1999 | A |
5946994 | Tether et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6053661 | Lewis | Apr 2000 | A |
6062772 | Perkins | May 2000 | A |
6109835 | Grabhorn | Aug 2000 | A |
6221445 | Jones | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6467996 | Garner | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6818274 | Buck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6857818 | Bussey et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7014390 | Morris | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7857547 | Summers et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
20040183221 | Bussey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070227977 | Fadhel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090242833 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2755833 | Jul 1978 | DE |
2374478 | Jul 1978 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Babu, et al., “Effect of polystyrene aggregate size on strength and moisture migration characteristics of lightweight concrete,” Cement & Concrete Composites, 28:520-527 (2006). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120288331 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61486020 | May 2011 | US |