The invention relates to a drainage channel having a drainage body and a cover according to the preamble of Claim 1.
Drainage channels having a cover are widely known. A major problem with such items is that, on the one hand, there must be a design that is favorable in terms of the cost of production, but on the other hand, the installation and assembly must be simple. In addition, the load capacity of the drainage channel with its cover is an essential criterion, since these will be installed and driven over in streets and public open spaces.
When the drainage channel and the cover are manufactured out of an appropriately stable material and the two parts are screwed together, a high-strength structure is created that is able to withstand higher loads; however the manufacturing costs and also the amount of work upon installation in the ground are substantial. In addition, the manufacturing and storage costs are high.
The object of the invention is to provide a drainage channel having a drainage body of the type mentioned above, such that even with a simple design and low manufacturing and storage costs, said drainage channels nevertheless have a high degree of strength when installed in the ground.
This object is achieved by a drainage channel according to Claim 1.
This object is achieved in particular by a drainage channel having a drainage body and a cover such that, when viewed in a longitudinal direction of the drainage body, the drainage body and the cover have continuous first engagement devices on the drainage body and continuous engagement devices on the cover, which cover connects upper edges of the drainage body to one another, transverse to the longitudinal direction, in a high tensile manner over the entire length of the drainage body. This creates a closed box design that, on the one hand, is easy to manufacture and install, but on the other hand, also has a high resistance to loads.
The first engagement devices are disposed in this case in different array patterns on the drainage body in such a way that different kinds of covers can be used with a (single) drainage body. In this way, different kinds of covers in terms of stability and design can be used, for which different kinds of drainage bodies were needed previously, which reduces manufacturing and storage costs.
The first engagement devices comprise teeth on the drainage body, the second engagement devices comprise guide rails on the cover (or vice versa), which engage with one another. Because the engagement devices are provided along the entire length of the drainage channel, the stability of the individual teeth (and guide rails) can be relatively low. The necessary stability is ensured simply through the quantity of engagement devices (or, respectively, of teeth).
The first engagement devices are preferably disposed in different height levels of the drainage body. This is applicable in particular when, as mentioned above, different kinds of covers are to be used with the same drainage body. In addition, it is also possible to design the covers in such a way that they are connected to, or, respectively, are supported on the drainage body at multiple points, thus in the different height levels. This can further increase the load capacity of the drainage channel.
In a first embodiment of the invention, the second engagement devices are mounted on the cover on a lower surface of peripheral groove supports. This results in a very simple design.
The second engagement devices may alternatively (or additionally) be designed as lower edges of peripheral longitudinal supports of the cover so that a design element of the cover is used that is already present (for reasons of stability).
In addition, stopper devices are preferably provided, which limit a displacement of the cover relative to the drainage body in the longitudinal direction thereof, so that the cover rests essentially immovably on the drainage body even in the case of loads on the cover in a longitudinal direction of the drainage channel (e.g. when a vehicle brakes or accelerates while rolling over the top thereof).
In addition, it is advantageous when the first engagement devices are designed with the second engagement devices so that they work together in such a way that they limit a displacement of the cover [relative] to the drainage body in the longitudinal direction thereof, as the above mentioned stopper devices alternatively or additionally do.
The entire design can then be manufactured to be especially light and (due to its low weight) can also be easily installed, when the drainage body is designed as a plastic injection molded part. The same applies to the cover, which likewise may be designed as a plastic injection molded part.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will be described in detail below on the basis of the Figures. Shown are:
In the following description, the same reference characters are used for identical or identically functioning parts.
The drainage channel shown in
Upper teeth 13, 13′ are provided on upper edges 12, 12′ of the drainage body 11, which upper teeth form a continuous row of teeth over the entire length of the drainage body. These teeth 13, 13′ engage with guide rails 24, which are provided on the lower surface of a groove support 21, 21′ of the cover 20 and which stabilize this groove support. The groove supports 21, 21′ project outwardly from longitudinal supports 22, 22′. When the cover 20, which is shown in
The engagement of the guide rails 24, which are shown in
In addition,
From the above, it is clear that the above mentioned high tensile connection between the upper edges 12, 12′ is also ensured when a cover 20 having a different shape (as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 108 387 | Sep 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/068581 | 9/9/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/037555 | 3/13/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
780981 | Daggett | Jan 1905 | A |
2305955 | Dudley | Dec 1942 | A |
5181793 | Dekel | Jan 1993 | A |
7637695 | Akkala | Dec 2009 | B1 |
20040126187 | Rathmann | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060159515 | Messerschimidt | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070144954 | Neuber | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070293008 | Hodgekins | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20130161246 | Meincke | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140332453 | Torras-Pique | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29617125 | Jan 1997 | DE |
248427 | Dec 1987 | EP |
2468969 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2002302995 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002348945 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004293204 | Oct 2004 | JP |
3128682 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2013-057211 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2327841 | Jun 2008 | RU |
2011150447 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2013/068581; Mailing Date of ISR Nov. 15, 2013; English translation of ISR included. |
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2015-530436; Dated: Sep. 16, 2016. |
The Search Report issued by the Russian Federation Patent Office in Corresponding Patent Application 2015113017/13; Mailing Date: Feb. 23, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150240470 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |