The invention relates to a drawer pull-out guide provided with an automatic retraction device and with a guide rail to be fixed on a carcass wall of a piece of furniture and a running rail which is movably mounted relative to the guide rail and to be fixed on the drawer—optionally with a central rail interposed—wherein a pawl component which is movable between two end positions which are spaced from one another in the direction of movement of the drawer is provided in a pawl housing disposed on one of the two aforementioned outer rails, the pawl component being biased by a spring arrangement into one end position and lockable in the other end position against retraction into the first end position and having a receptacle for a catch which is provided on the other rail and which moves into the receptacle as the rails move relative to each other when approaching the closed position, thereby disengaging the pretensioned movable pawl component from the associated end position so that the pawl component is moved under the effect of spring tension into the first end position and by way of the catch held in the receptacle entrains the rail associated therewith in the direction of retraction of the drawer, a damper which acts on the pawl component being provided on or in the pawl housing to damp and/or slow down the retraction movement of the pawl component.
Drawer guides which are provided with an automatic retraction device and by which during the closing movement before the completely closed position is reached a drawer held so that it can be pulled out on a cupboard carcass is forcibly retained by the tensional force of a biased spring in the closed position of the drawer and secured against inadvertent outward movement—for example by the reaction of the impact of the front drawer panel on the cupboard carcass or by displacement of air within the cupboard carcass when adjacent drawers are pushed in or pulled out—have been introduced to an increasing extent in recent years (e.g. DE 4 020 277 C2). Because modem drawer guides have a very easy action due to the mounting of the rails by means of anti-friction bearing or rollers, the bias of the biasing springs used for retraction must be such that the appertaining drawers can be securely retracted even in the event of relatively heavy loading and on the other hand drawers which are less heavily loaded are not accidentally opened even in the event of air currents in the carcass. In this case it has been shown that it is difficult to design the bias of a spring which is optimal and takes account of all requirements. As a rule, therefore, the tensional force of the spring is designed with a safety margin, but the consequence of this is that at least lighter drawers are speeded up on the retraction path and strike the cupboard carcass if it is not intentionally slowed down by the a person operating the drawer. Many furniture purchasers object to this jerky slamming or snapping shut, so that in recent years furniture manufacturers have changed over to the provision of dampers which are additionally effective between the drawers and the cupboard carcass during the automatic retraction process and which prevent the possibility of the drawer also being speeded up excessively by the spring of the automatic retraction device with its relative bias. In order for the design expenditure which is increased by the use of such additional damping and also the production expenditure—increased due to the necessary installation work—it has already been proposed that the damper which becomes effective during the automatic retraction movement should be integrated into the retraction device (DE 202 04 860.8). On the other hand, however, due to the use of dampers it is also necessary to increase the spring force of the automatic retraction device further in order to ensure that the associated drawer is closed exactly. This also produces the disadvantage during opening of the drawer that due to the usual longer spring path the spring force increases significantly, which results in unpleasantly high pull-out forces.
The object of the invention, therefore, is to improve the automatic retraction devices with dampers developed for drawer pull-out guides in such a way that on the one hand the spring forces necessary for secure closing of the drawers are achieved without excessively high pull-out forces being produced when the drawer is pulled out.
Starting from a drawer pull-out guide of the type referred to in the introduction this object is achieved according to the invention in that an entraining rocker which is coupled to the pawl component and is movable during a final part of the retraction movement of the pawl component is additionally provided in the pawl housing and during the initial displacement path is decoupled therefrom and is retained so that it is secured against longitudinal displacement in the pawl housing, and that a separate spring which biases the entraining rocker in the direction of retraction engages on the entraining rocker. The arrangement of an entraining rocker which is coupled to the pawl component only over a part of the pull-out path and with which a separate spring is associated ensures that the pull-out force to be overcome during the first part of the pull-out movement is determined by the pull-out path of both springs, but that then because of the locking of the entraining rocker during the second part of the pull-out movement and decoupling of the pawl component only the force of the first spring to engage on the pawl component still has to be overcome.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the movable pawl component is longitudinally movable in the elongate pawl housing which is U-shaped in cross-section and is guided in the end which is at the front in the direction of retraction of the drawer for locking so as to be pivotable about an axis which extends at right angles to the direction of displacement, the entraining rocker being provided in the surface of the pawl component between the inner face of the web of the pawl housing facing the pawl component and the surface within the housing facing it.
As a result the design can be such that in one of the side walls of the pawl housing forming the leg of the U-shaped cross-section in the pull-out direction to the entraining rocker a recess which extends in the direction of displacement of the pawl component can be provided in which a portion of the entraining rocker can be pivoted into a predetermined displacement position and can be locked against further displacement, wherein from the boundary surface of the pawl component facing the entraining rocker an entraining lug projects towards the entraining rocker and in the position of the entraining rocker in which it is not pivoted into the recess of the pawl housing engages in an associated receptacle in the entraining rocker and couples the latter to the pawl component in the position of the entraining rocker in which it is pivoted into the recess but freely comes out of the receptacle, as a result of which the pawl component is decoupled from the entraining rocker.
In this case it is recommended to provide an elongate depression or through opening extending in the direction of displacement of the pawl component in the inner surface of the web of the pawl housing in which a lug projecting from the facing flat face of the entraining rocker engages, wherein in the end region opposite the lug in the pivoted-out position of the entraining rocker the elongate recess then has a laterally enlarged receiving portion for the lug into which the lug is moved in the pivoted-out position of the entraining rocker, i.e. the position in which it is locked in the pawl housing.
In order to ensure the pivoting of the entraining rocker along the desired partial pull-out path, in a variant of the invention it is proposed that the end surfaces of the receptacle in the entraining rocker are constructed as oblique surfaces extending obliquely with respect to the direction of displacement of the pawl component in such a way that during displacement of the pawl component in the drawer pull-out direction the entraining lug projecting from the pawl component slides on the associated oblique surface and pivots the entraining rocker out into the associated recess but during displacement of the pawl component in the drawer retraction direction on entering the receptacle the entraining lug slides downwards on the associated oblique surface and pivots the entraining rocker back out of the recess.
The invention is explained in greater detail in the following description with reference to the drawings of an embodiment, in which:
a to 12c each show a side view, a plan view and a sectional view of the automatic retraction device shown in
a to 13c show views of the automatic retraction device which correspond to the representations in
a,
14
b show views of the automatic retraction device corresponding to
The automatic retraction device 20 which is illustrated in section in the drawings and is explained in greater detail below in connection with
The automatic retraction device 20 corresponds in principle to the aforementioned automatic retraction device already known from DE 40 20 277 C2, i.e. the flat pawl component 24 which is shown separately in
The retraction movement is slowed down by a damper constructed as an elongate piston damper 38 (
In the case of drawers with a high carrying capacity and also potentially high dead weight, the spring 34 must engage with a corresponding high biasing force on the locked pawl component 24. The consequence of this is that during opening of a drawer a correspondingly high pull-out force must be generated until the pawl component 24 is locked in the pawl housing 22. This means that as pulling out begins the drawer has a significant resistance to pulling out, which is already undesirable for reasons of comfort.
In order to create a marked reduction in this resistance to pulling out and nevertheless to ensure smooth and complete retraction of a drawer mounted with the pull-out guide 10 according to the invention in a cupboard carcass, in a variant according to the invention it is proposed that the retraction forced exerted by the spring 34 on the pawl component is only so strong that the opening force to be exerted by a person opening the drawer is of a comfortable magnitude, i.e. not too high, even in the end region of the locking path. On the other hand, in order as the drawer approaches the closed position in which the biasing force of the spring 34 decreases markedly due to the largest possible displacement path the closing force is kept sufficiently high in order to close the drawer completely and reliably, in a variant according to the invention a second spring 36 (
A crucial factor in ensuring that the total force necessary for pulling out the drawer does not rise again to an undesirable value due to the spring 36 additionally engaging on the entraining rocker 40, the entraining coupling of the entraining rocker 40 with the pawl component 24 only occurs over a first part of the pull-out path during which the two springs 34, 36 build up relatively low spring forces in spite of their parallel arrangement. After a first part of the pull-out path the entraining rocker 40 is decoupled from the pawl component 24 and locked in the pawl housing 22, so that then over the rest of the pull-out path only the spring tension of the spring 34 exerts a restoring force on the pawl component 24. Thus when the drawer is closed the automatic retraction device 20 first of all exerts the closing force built up in the spring 34 as the closed position is approached and retracts the drawer by way of the catch 28 and the running rail 16. After a predetermined part of the retraction path the entraining coupling of the pawl component 24 to the entraining rocker 40 is restored, so that the latter is disengaged from the pawl housing 22. As a result in addition to the force of the already partially relaxed spring 34 the biasing force of the additional spring 36 then becomes effective and the total retraction force is increased to a value necessary for reliable closing of the drawer.
For the embodiment of the pull-out guide according to the invention which is described here, the actual release of the entraining coupling of the entraining rocker 40 to the pawl component 24 only during a part of the total retraction or pull-out path is produced by an arrangement whereby the entraining rocker 40 is disposed between the inner face of the web of the pawl housing 22 facing the pawl component and the underside of the pawl component 24 facing it, wherein an entraining lug 44 projects from the underside of the pawl component 24 towards the entraining rocker 40 and is for its part disposed below the pawl component 24 so as to be pivotable or tiltable in the transverse direction in the pawl housing 22. Associated with the entraining lug 44 is a receptacle 46 in the entraining rocker 40 in which the entraining lug 44 engages during the entraining coupling of the pawl component 24 and entraining rocker 40.
In alignment with the entraining rocker 40 there is provided in the pawl housing 22 a recess 48 which extends in the direction of displacement of the pawl component and into which a portion of the entraining rocker 40 can be pivoted in a predetermined displacement position and can be locked against further displacement. This locked position is shown for example in
Three different positions of the pawl component 24 are illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
203 11 795 U | Jul 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/008411 | 7/28/2004 | WO | 00 | 1/30/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/011438 | 2/10/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5207781 | Rock | May 1993 | A |
5302016 | Lautenschlager et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5474375 | Hollenstein et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
6629738 | Salice | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6736471 | Lin | May 2004 | B2 |
6846053 | Salice | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6953233 | Lam et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7028370 | Hoshide et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7185959 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7210198 | Hoshide et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7249813 | Gasser | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020033658 | Salice | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040000850 | Lam Harn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070046158 | Hoffman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070132346 | Huang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 20 277 | Jan 1992 | DE |
202 18 067 | Jan 2003 | DE |
202 04 860 | Jul 2003 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060238089 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |