1. Field
This disclosure generally relates to freeform drawing. More particularly, the disclosure relates to freeform drawing with edge detection.
2. General Background
Systems have been developed to allow users to draw various types of drawings. These systems vary in complexity so that a user ranging from the leisure artist to the professional developer has the tools that will be helpful in his or her artistic ventures.
Some of these systems allow a user to perform freeform drawing. The freeform drawing tool may be useful to a leisure or professional user. However, current freeform drawing tools are limited in their abilities. The user is not provided with enough supportive functionality to encapsulate the benefits of freeform drawing.
Further, in the physical world, a user can place a pen against an edge of a support tool such as a ruler. The user receives haptic feedback as a result of whether the pen is against the edge or not. However, in the virtual world, haptic feedback is currently not provided for support drawing tools. Accordingly, a user may have difficulty lining up an edge of a support drawing tool with a virtual pen.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a computer program product is provided. The computer program product includes a computer useable medium having a computer readable program. The computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to display, at a graphical user interface, a shape. Further, the computer readable program when executed the computer causes the computer to display, at the graphical user interface, a buffer region that is adjacent to an edge of the shape. In addition, the computer readable program when executed the computer causes the computer to receive, from an input device, a set of drawing data located within the buffer region. The computer readable program when executed the computer also causes the computer to determine, with a processor a first subset of the drawing data that is located in the buffer region at a predetermined distance from the edge and a second subset of the drawing data in the buffer region that is located at a distance from the edge that exceeds the predetermined distance. Further, the computer readable program when executed the computer causes the computer to display the first subset of drawing data. In addition, the computer readable program when executed the computer causes the computer to prevent the second subset of drawing data from being displayed at the distance. The computer readable program when executed the computer also causes the computer to display the second subset of drawing data at the predetermined distance.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a process is provided. The process displays, at a graphical user interface, a shape. Further, the process displays, at the graphical user interface, a buffer region that is adjacent to an edge of the shape. In addition, the process receives, from an input device, a set of drawing data located within the buffer region. The process also determines, with a processor a first subset of the drawing data that is located in the buffer region at a predetermined distance from the edge and a second subset of the drawing data in the buffer region that is located at a distance from the edge that exceeds the predetermined distance. Further, the process displays the first subset of drawing data. In addition, the process prevents the second subset of drawing data from being displayed at the distance. The process also displays the second subset of drawing data at the predetermined distance.
In yet another aspect of the disclosure, a system is provided. The system includes an input device that receives freeform drawing data from a user. Further, the system includes a graphical user interface that displays a shape and a buffer region that is adjacent to an edge of the shape. In addition, the system includes an input device that receives a set of drawing data located within the buffer region. The system also includes a processor that (i) determines a first subset of the drawing data that is located in the buffer region at a predetermined distance from the edge and a second subset of the drawing data in the buffer region that is located at a distance from the edge that exceeds the predetermined distance, (ii) provides the first subset of drawing data to the graphical user interface to be displayed, (iii) prevents the second subset of drawing data from being displayed at the distance, and (iv) displays the second subset of drawing data at the predetermined distance.
The above-mentioned features of the present disclosure will become more apparent with reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and in which:
An edge detection method, system, and computer program product are provided to expand the abilities of computerized freeform stencil drawing for a user. In one embodiment, a shape is provided on a graphical user interface (“GUI”) to allow the user to restrict the freeform drawing based on the shape. The shape may be any type of polygon, symbol, etc. In one embodiment, the shape is predefined. For example, a computer system may have a predefined shape for user by the user. Alternatively, the computer system may have a plurality of shapes from which the user may choose. In another embodiment, the shape is defined by the user. The user may draw a shape, select a shape, etc. for use with freeform drawing. Further, the user may be given one or more user controls for the shape. For example, the user may change the size of the shape, the color of the shape, etc.
In one embodiment, the shape is selected by the user from a predefined set of shapes. In another embodiment, the user freeform draws the shape and that resulting shape is utilized as the shape. In yet another embodiment, the shape may be scaled and/or rotated.
In one embodiment, the user may draw on the edge itself, but that freeform drawing data will be repositioned in a predefined position relative to the edge in the graphical user interface. For example, if the user is drawing outside of the circular shape 202 in
In another embodiment, the user may draw in an additional predetermined region other than the predetermined region, but that freeform drawing data will be repositioned in a predefined position relative to an edge in the graphical user interface. For example, if the user initiates drawing outside of the circular shape 202 in
In yet another embodiment, the user may both draw on the edge itself and in the additional predetermined region so that the freeform drawing data is snapped to a position relative to the shape in which freeform drawing data may be displayed. If freeform drawing data is allowed on the outside of the shape, the freeform drawing data on the edge or within the shape is snapped to the outside of the shape. If freeform drawing data is allowed on the inside of the shape, the freeform drawing data on the edge or outside of the shape is snapped to the inside of the shape.
In any of the configurations provided herein, a feature may allow for a user to freeform draw on the stencil shape edge so that the freeform drawing is displayed on the edge. This feature may be predefined or user-defined. In another embodiment, this feature may be enabled or disabled by the user.
In one embodiment, the user is provided with a switch 204 to change the manner in which the freeform drawing is restricted. For example, the switch may initially be configured to restrict the user from drawing outside of the circular shape 202. The user may proceed with drawing to have some freeform drawing within the circular shape 202. Further, the user 108 may then choose to change the switch 204 so that freeform drawing is performed outside of the circular shape 202. As a result, the user may have a drawing with some freeform drawing inside of and some freeform drawing outside of the circular shape 202. In one embodiment, the system may autodetect inside the shape drawing or outside the shape drawing by determining the start position of the drawing. For example, if the user starts drawing at a position inside the shape, the user may indicate that he or she would like the system to perform inside the shape drawing whereas if the user starts drawing at a location outside of the shape, the user may indicate that he or she would like the system to perform outside of the shape drawing.
In one embodiment, the switch 204 may be utilized with the mobile shape. In other words, the user may choose to switch back and forth between restricting inside and outside freeform drawing.
In another embodiment, the mobile shape may move automatically. The speed of movement may be changed by the user. In one embodiment, the shape may be scaled, rotated, and/or repositioned simultaneously while drawing. In yet another embodiment, the user moves the mobile shape through a user input. In one embodiment, the movement is an animation. For example, the animation may be a path of the circular shape moving around the GUI 104. The animation may be custom defined by the user or predefined. In one embodiment, a user that would like to draw a pattern may do so with the assistance of the animated shape.
The edge detection described herein is not limited to any particular kind of shape. Further, the edge detection is not limited to any particular quantity of shapes.
With any of the configurations described herein, brush properties may change when an edge is detected. As an example, a drawing may be shown only when an edge is detected. Further, the visual appearance of the brush, e.g., brush size, brush color, brush opacity, brush type, or the like, may change when an edge is detected. For example, the edge may change from blue to red when an edge is touched.
Further, any of the configurations described herein may be utilized with a multi-touch based input device. An example of a touch based input device is a touch screen. The user is able to draw with his or her fingers. In one embodiment, different properties may be assigned to different fingers for a touch based input device. For example, if one finger is inside the edge, the system is configured to stop displaying freeform drawing data if the user's finger touches the edge and moves beyond the edge. The system may also be configured so that another finger of the user corresponds to displaying data outside of the edge so that if the user's finger touches the edge and moves inside the edge, that particular freeform drawing data for that finger is not displayed. Further, one hand may be utilized to touch the GUI 104 to move, size, and/or shape the drawing stencil in the GUI 104 while the other hand is utilized to touch the GUI 104 to perform freeform drawing.
The Input/Output (“I/O”) devices 608 can be coupled directly to the system configuration 600 or through intervening input/output controllers. Further, the I/O devices 608 may include a keyboard, a keypad, a mouse, a microphone for capturing speech commands, a pointing device, and other input devices that will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. Further, the I/O devices 608 may include output devices such as a printer, display screen, or the like. Further, the I/O devices 608 may include a receiver, transmitter, speaker, display, image capture sensor, biometric sensor, etc. In addition, the I/O devices 608 may include storage devices such as a tape drive, floppy drive, hard disk drive, compact disk (“CD”) drive, etc.
Network adapters may also be coupled to the system configuration 600 to enable the system configuration 600 to become coupled to other systems, remote printers, or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modems, and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
In one embodiment, the drawing support tool may be utilized with an input device that is a touch enabled device. In one configuration, a touch input moves the shape. In another configuration, a first touch input and a second touch input moves the shape and rotates the shape.
In another embodiment, the drawing support tool 700 may be utilized with a device that is not touch enabled.
The snapping in any of the configurations described herein may be based moving designated portions of lines, shapes, etc. For example, the center of the width of a line may be utilized to measure the line from the predetermined distance and move the line. Any of the stencils or drawing support tools described herein may be applied to take into account geometric properties such the width of the line. Constant and/or variable widths may be utilized. An example of a variable width of a line results from utilization of a pressure sensitive pen in the physical world or the virtual world.
The buffer region described herein may be utilized with any type of shape. As an example, a circular drawing support tool with a buffer region around the circle may be utilized. As a result, a user may be able to utilize a virtual compass to draw a circle.
In another embodiment, a drawing support tool is a drawing accessory. The drawing accessory is a graphical object that affects the behavior of the drawing tools within a system. As graphical objects, the drawing accessories are software components such that their visual depiction is their primary user interface. Further, the primary means of control is the physical manipulation of those graphical objects by dragging control handles. The control handles may include portions of a graphical object located inside or outside of the graphical object. Further, a control handle may occupy the entire area of the graphical object. For instance, in one configuration, the entire area of a straight edge drawing support tool is a multi-touch control handle. In one embodiment, drawing accessories, e.g., the straight edge drawing support tool, may be depicted with instructive ideograms providing the user with a queue as to the available functionality. For example, one finger may drag parallel and two fingers may drag in order to adjust the angle of the straight edge.
Other implementations may provide additional control handles, buttons, or other user interface elements. In another configuration, a toggle button may be utilized as a switch to determine whether the parallel motion of the straight edge should be constrained to regular increments. In other words, the toggle button may be utilized to form a grid. The user may drag the straight edge by the grid toggle in order to reset the grid origin. In one embodiment, drag handles perform different functions when clicked as opposed to when being dragged. In another embodiment, the drag handles perform different functions depending on the number of points that the drag handles are dragged by.
Further, in yet another embodiment, when the user is dragging a drawing support tool, assistive graphics may be displayed on the GUI depending on the options that are selected.
In addition to instructive graphics or text, a drawing accessory may have buttons to alter its mode of operation or drag areas. As an example, a ruler may have an icon on its surface. The user may tap the ruler to active and deactivate vanishing points. The user may press and drag, e.g., as in a menu, to select which vanishing point to utilize, e.g., utilizing the left horizon or the right horizon. When a vanishing point is in use, the visual depiction of the straight edge may be changed to provide visual reinforcement of the active mode and to allow the user to draw with both edges of the straight edge. When vanishing points are active, the top and the bottom edge of the straight edge are not parallel.
A variety of alternate interfaces may be utilized with the drawing support tool configurations described herein. For small GUIs, e.g., on a mobile device, a straight edge drawing support tool may be manipulated without having to have the secondary hand covering the GUI, which has the additional benefit of allowing the straight edge to be visually quite small.
Physical modeling of friction and inertia may be utilized to enhance the feeling that the drawing accessories are physical objects. Drawing accessories may be utilized in conjunction with one another. For example, a virtual triangle may be utilized with a virtual parallel in order to easily and consistently produce lines at precise and reproducible angles. For instance, the combination of a 30-60-90 triangle and a 45 degree triangle may be combined to produce any angle in an increment of fifteen degrees. The implementation may include modeling collision detection between drawing accessories. Other implementations may be abstract constraints where a triangle moved by the user will snap into position if released approximately touching and aligned with the straight edge of another drawing accessory.
As drawing accessories are connected to one another, they form a hierarchy of connections. The root of this hierarchy may be visually distinguished, e.g., by changing its color or darkening its outline.
The circle template 2300 may have a user interface, e.g., button, to distort the circle to a given projection plane, isometric plane, or orthographic plane. Further, the circle template 2300 ma also pick up this data from the parallel drawing support tool or synchronize this data automatically. In addition, the circle template 2300 may participate in the snapping behavior described for virtual triangles where the edge of the circle or center of the circle may snap to a straight edge drawing support tool or another circle. Further, the circle template 2300 may be extended to an ellipse template by providing one or more individual drag handles, buttons, and/or direct or indirect touch-gestures to adjust the major and minor radii and the orientation of the ellipse either individually or in a synchronized manner. The ellipse template may additional snap its major axis and/or its minor axis to a straight edge drawing support tool.
Although many of the configurations have been described with respect to touch-enabled devices, other devices may be utilized. For example, a user may utilize one or more drag handles with a computer mouse to interact with the drawing support tools described herein.
The system configuration 600 illustrated in
It should be understood that the processes and systems described herein can take the form of entirely hardware embodiments, entirely software embodiments, or embodiments containing both hardware and software elements. If software is utilized to implement the method or system, the software can include but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
It is understood that the processes and systems described herein may also be applied in other types of processes and systems. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various adaptations and modifications of the embodiments of the processes and systems described herein may be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the present processes, systems, and computer program products. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the present processes, systems, and computer program products may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/406,043, entitled Drawing Support Tool, filed on Oct. 22, 2010, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5124693 | Himelstein et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132671 | Louis et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5301267 | Hassett et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5499366 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5572639 | Gantt | Nov 1996 | A |
5577170 | Karow | Nov 1996 | A |
5684510 | Brassell et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5715473 | Reed | Feb 1998 | A |
5771042 | Santos-Gomez | Jun 1998 | A |
5872566 | Bates et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5930408 | Seto | Jul 1999 | A |
5943050 | Bullock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956736 | Hanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6005967 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36704 | Parker et al. | May 2000 | E |
6377240 | Baudel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6469709 | Sakai | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480813 | Bloomquist et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6678410 | Phinney et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6828971 | Uesaki et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6959112 | Wagman | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7034845 | Perry et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058903 | Jonach et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7136067 | Stamm et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7222306 | Kaasila et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236174 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7292249 | Stamm et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7437683 | Beezer et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7545392 | Sprang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583267 | Stamm et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594174 | Truelove et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7684619 | Sprang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7769819 | Lerman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8223165 | Jitkoff et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8269736 | Wilairat | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8315473 | Tao et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8386956 | Ording et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8416243 | Plummer | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8471856 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8842120 | Tijssen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8896621 | Sipher et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
20010024212 | Ohnishi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020051007 | Kitagawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085018 | Chien | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030038797 | Vazzana | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040066393 | Cragun | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040177323 | Kaasila et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183817 | Kaasila | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040268223 | Tojo | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012755 | Dresevic et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062758 | Kaasila et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050162430 | Stamm et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168476 | Levene et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188309 | Tasker et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190187 | Salesin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195221 | Berger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237342 | Stamm et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060017733 | Matskewich et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022956 | Lengeling | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048069 | Igeta | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114258 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070070071 | Terazono et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097128 | Lim | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106929 | Foster et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070139413 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139415 | Stamm et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150834 | Muller et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157097 | Peters | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188497 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189708 | Lerman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216689 | Stamm et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266319 | Matsuo | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266335 | Zielinski et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268273 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273668 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080012862 | Duggan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024500 | Bae | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034317 | Fard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097621 | Tasker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080165193 | Stamm et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080229238 | Young | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238916 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238922 | Rhodes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244410 | Schormann | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294974 | Nurmi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301547 | Karunakaran et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090184980 | Mansfield | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090288043 | Willis | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295826 | Good et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303178 | Koda et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013862 | Gershfeld | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056221 | Park | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058226 | Flake et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058228 | Park | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088632 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100162151 | Class et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100214257 | Wussler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100271404 | Marr | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278504 | Lyons et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100313154 | Choi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318908 | Neuman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025719 | Yanase | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069085 | Weber et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072344 | Harris et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110116769 | Suglyama et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122159 | Bergsten et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138313 | Decker et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157029 | Tseng | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167349 | Samra et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175821 | King | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181521 | Reid et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181617 | Tsuda et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197124 | Garaventa | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197153 | King et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246916 | Leskelä et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302532 | Missig | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314424 | Gusmorino et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017153 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017163 | Ragan | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120042272 | Hong et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120092340 | Sarnoff et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110438 | Peraza et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120198330 | Koppel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210222 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120313865 | Pearce | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130097502 | Langmacher et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130127867 | Tijssen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127878 | Tijssen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132878 | Tijssen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132888 | Tijssen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132907 | Kukulski et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145268 | Kukulski | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145270 | Piran et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140088926 | Rhoades et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150199073 | Kukulski et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Characterizing tool use in an interactive drawing environment, Amant et al., 2002. |
“Surface by Microsoft, Pre-Order the New Windows Tablet”, retrieved from <http://www.microsoft.com/surface/en-US> on Oct. 17, 2012, 5 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,023, (Oct. 11, 2013), 22 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,924, (Sep. 25, 2013),17 pages. |
“Fontlab Fontographer 5”, Fontlab, Ltd., (Jun. 2010), 525 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,799, (Sep. 16, 2013), 22 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,081, (Oct. 11, 2013),14 pages. |
Deneba Systems Inc., “Canvas Tips and Techniques,” published online, 2002, pp. 5-6. |
“thePhotoFinishes Corel Draw X4 Suite,” p. 5. |
Bain, Steve, “Cool Tricks with Paragraph Text in CorelDRAW,” published online, 2010. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/225,203, (Aug. 29, 2013),10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/893,669, (Sep. 12, 2013),14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,023, (Jul. 9, 2013),19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/225,203, (Apr. 12, 2013), 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,924, (Mar. 1, 2013), 19 pages. |
“Adobe PostScript”, Available at <http://www.signwarehouse.com/tech-support/manuals/Laser%20Master.pdf>, 2006, 181 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,799, Feb. 7, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,081, Feb. 24, 2014, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/893,669, Apr. 21, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,023, Jan. 31, 2014, 33 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/225,203, Mar. 20, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,367, Dec. 26, 2013, 21 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,081, May 15, 2014, 4 pages. |
“TrueType 1.0 Font Files”, Technical Specification, Revision 1.66, Aug. 1995, 408 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/893,669, Oct. 16, 2014, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,367, Dec. 16, 2014, 21 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,023, Jul. 3, 2014, 43 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/225,203, Aug. 28, 2014, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,367, Jul. 3, 2014, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,799, Sep. 16, 2014, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,924, Jul. 3, 2014, 14 pages. |
“SolidWorks Help—Highlighting”, Retrieved from <http://help.solidworks.com/2012/English/SolidWorks/sldworks/c—Highlighting.htm> in Sep. 16, 2014, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Better editing with custom screen layouts”, Retrieved from <https://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/> on Jan. 30, 2015, Jun. 18, 210, 7 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,799, Mar. 25, 2015, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/309,924, Jan. 29, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, Application No. 13/339,367, Apr. 23, 2015, 22 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/893,669, Mar. 25, 2015, 20 pages. |
Hauptmann,“Artificial Intelligence Techniques in the Interface to a Digital Video Library”, CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Mar. 1997, 6 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/893,669, Aug. 11, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,367, Oct. 21, 2015, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130127910 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61406043 | Oct 2010 | US |