The present application claims the benefit of 35 U.S.C. 111(b) provisional application Ser. No. 60/681,692 filed May 17, 2005, and entitled Drill Bit and Cutting Inserts For Hard/Abrasive Formations.
Not Applicable.
The invention relates generally to earth-boring bits used to drill a borehole for the ultimate recovery of oil, gas or minerals. More particularly, the invention relates to rolling cone rock bits and to an improved cutting structure for such bits. Still more particularly, the invention relates to enhancements in cutter element geometry, to increase bit durability and rate of penetration and enhance the bit's ability to maintain gage in hard and abrasive formations.
An earth-boring drill bit is typically mounted on the lower end of a drill string and is rotated by rotating the drill string at the surface or by actuation of downhole motors or turbines, or by both methods. With weight applied to the drill string, the rotating drill bit engages the earthen formation and proceeds to form a borehole along a predetermined path toward a target zone. The borehole formed in the drilling process will have a diameter generally equal to the diameter or “gage” of the drill bit.
A typical earth-boring bit includes one or more rotatable cutters that perform their cutting function due to the rolling movement of the cutters acting against the formation material. The cutters roll and slide upon the bottom of the borehole as the bit is rotated, the cutters thereby engaging and disintegrating the formation material in its path. The rotatable cutters may be described as generally conical in shape and are therefore sometimes referred to as rolling cones. The borehole is formed as the gouging and scraping or crushing and chipping action of the rotary cones remove chips of formation material which are carried upward and out of the borehole by drilling fluid which is pumped downwardly through the drill pipe and out of the bit.
The earth disintegrating action of the rolling cone cutters is enhanced by providing the cutters with a plurality of cutter elements. Cutter elements are generally of two types: inserts formed of a very hard material, such as tungsten carbide, that are press fit into undersized apertures in the cone surface; or teeth that are milled, cast or otherwise integrally formed from the material of the rolling cone. Bits having tungsten carbide inserts are typically referred to as “TCI” bits or “insert” bits, while those having teeth formed from the cone material are known as “steel tooth bits.” In each instance, the cutter elements on the rotating cutters break up the formation to form a new borehole by a combination of gouging and scraping or chipping and crushing.
In oil and gas drilling, the cost of drilling a borehole is proportional to the length of time it takes to drill to the desired depth and location. The time required to drill the well, in turn, is greatly affected by the number of times the drill bit must be changed in order to reach the targeted formation. This is the case because each time the bit is changed, the entire string of drill pipe, which may be miles long, must be retrieved from the borehole, section by section. Once the drill string has been retrieved and the new bit installed, the bit must be lowered to the bottom of the borehole on the drill string, which again must be constructed section by section. As is thus obvious, this process, known as a “trip” of the drill string, requires considerable time, effort and expense. Accordingly, it is always desirable to employ drill bits which will drill faster and longer and which are usable over a wider range of formation hardness.
The length of time that a drill bit may be employed before it must be changed depends upon its rate of penetration (“ROP”), as well as its durability. The form and positioning of the cutter elements upon the cone cutters greatly impact bit durability and ROP, and thus are critical to the success of a particular bit design.
Bit durability is, in part, measured by a bit's ability to “hold gage,” meaning its ability to maintain a full gage borehole diameter over the entire length of the borehole. Gage holding ability is particularly vital in directional drilling applications which have become increasingly important. If gage is not maintained at a relatively constant dimension, it becomes more difficult, and thus more costly, to insert drilling apparatus into the borehole than if the borehole had a constant diameter. For example, when a new, unworn bit is inserted into an undergage borehole, the new bit will be required to ream the undergage hole as it progresses toward the bottom of the borehole. Thus, by the time it reaches the bottom, the bit may have experienced a substantial amount of wear that it would not have experienced had the prior bit been able to maintain full gage. Such wear will shorten the life of the newly-inserted bit, thus prematurely requiring the time consuming and expensive process of removing the drill string, replacing the worn bit, and reinstalling another new bit downhole.
To assist in maintaining the gage of a borehole, conventional rolling cone bits typically employ a heel row of hard metal inserts on the heel surface of the rolling cone cutters. The heel surface is a generally frustoconical surface and is configured and positioned so as to generally align with and ream the sidewall of the borehole as the bit rotates. The inserts in the heel surface contact the borehole wall with a sliding motion and thus generally may be described as scraping or reaming the borehole sidewall. The heel inserts function primarily to maintain a constant gage and secondarily to prevent the erosion and abrasion of the heel surface of the rolling cone. Excessive wear of the heel inserts leads to an undergage borehole, decreased ROP, increased loading on the other cutter elements on the bit, and may accelerate wear of the cutter bearing, and ultimately lead to bit failure.
Conventional bits also typically include one or more rows of gage cutter elements. Gage row elements are mounted adjacent to the heel surface but orientated and sized in such a manner so as to cut the corner of the borehole. In this orientation, the gage cutter elements generally are required to cut both the borehole bottom and sidewall. The lower surface of the gage row cutter elements engage the borehole bottom while the radially outermost surface scrapes the sidewall of the borehole.
Conventional bits also include a number of additional rows of cutter elements that are located on the cones in rows disposed radially inward from the gage row. These cutter elements are sized and configured for cutting the bottom of the borehole and are typically described as inner row cutter elements. In many applications, inner row cutter elements are relatively long and sharper than those typically employed in the gage row or the heel row where the inserts ream the sidewall of the borehole and cut formation via a scraping or shearing action. By contrast, the inner row cutters are intended to penetrate and remove formation material by gouging and fracturing formation material. Consequently, particularly in softer formations, it is desirable that the inner row inserts have a relatively large extension height above the cone steel to facilitate rapid removal of formation material from the bottom of the borehole. However, in hard formations, such longer extensions make the inserts more susceptible to failure due to breakage. Thus, in hard formations, it is common to have relatively short extensions. Nevertheless, it has been conventional practice to employ relatively sharp geometry on the inserts in the hard rock formations in order to better penetrate the formation material. Common cutter shapes for inner row and gage row inserts for hard formations are chisel and conical shapes. Although such inserts with their shorter extensions have generally avoided breakage problems associated with longer and more aggressive inserts, and although the relativity sharp chisel and conical shapes provide reasonable rates of penetration and bit life they tend wear at a fast rate in hard abrasive formations because of the sharp tip geometry which reduces the footage drilled. Increasing ROP while maintaining good cutter and bit life to increase the footage drilled is still an important goal so as to decrease drilling time and recover valuable oil and gas more economically.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a drill bit and cutting structure that, in relatively hard and/or highly abrasive formations, will yield an increase in ROP and footage drilled, while maintaining a full gage borehole.
These and other needs in the art are addressed in one embodiment by a rolling cone drill bit for drilling a borehole in earthen formations. In an embodiment, the bit comprises a bit body having a bit axis. In addition, the bit comprises at least one rolling cone cutter mounted on the bit body for rotation about a cone axis and having a first surface for cutting the borehole bottom and second surface for cutting the borehole sidewall. Further, the bit comprises a plurality of cutter elements secured to the cone cutter and extending from the first surface and positioned in a first circumferential row, wherein at least one of the cutter elements comprises a cutter element axis, a base portion having a diameter, and a cutting portion extending from the base portion to a point furthermost from the base portion defining an extension height. Still further, the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the cutter element defined by a plane perpendicular to the cutter element axis at a point equal to ninety-four percent of the extension height to the cross-sectional area of the cutter element base defined by a plane perpendicular to the cutter element axis is greater than 0.2. Moreover, the ratio of the extension height to the base diameter is not greater than 0.75.
These and other needs in the art are addressed in another embodiment by a rolling cone drill bit for drilling through earthen formations to form a borehole with a hole bottom and a sidewall. In an embodiment, the drill bit comprises at least one rolling cone cutter rotatably mounted on a bit body, the rolling cone cutter including a first surface generally facing the borehole bottom and a second surface generally facing the sidewall of the borehole. In addition, the drill bit comprises at least one cutter element mounted in the rolling cone cutter and secured in a position to cut against the borehole bottom, wherein the at least one cutter element including a base portion and a cutting portion extending from the base portion to a cutting tip, the cutting portion tapering from the base portion to the cutting tip and defining an extension height. Still further, the at least one cutter element has a tip-to-base volume ratio of at least 0.17.
These and other needs in the art are addressed in another embodiment by a rolling cone drill bit for drilling through earthen formations to form a borehole having a hole bottom and a hole sidewall. In an embodiment, the drill bit comprises at least one rolling cone cutter rotatably mounted on a bit body for rotation about a cone axis. In addition, the bit comprises a plurality of inner row cutter elements mounted in the cone cutter in a first circumferential row, the inner row cutter having a generally conical cutting portion extending from a cylindrical base to a cutting tip and defining an extension height, wherein the extension height is not greater than 0.75. Further, the bit comprises a plurality of gage row cutter elements mounted in the cone cutter in a second circumferential row, the gage row cutter elements having a cutting portion extending from a generally cylindrical base to a cutting tip and defining an extension height, wherein the extension height of the gage row cutter elements are not greater than 0.5. Still further, the plurality of inner row cutter elements and a plurality of gage row cutter elements each include a tip-to-base volume ratio of at least 0.17.
These and other needs in the art are addressed in another embodiment by a method of designing a rolling cone drill bit for forming a borehole. In an embodiment, the method comprises selecting a rolling cone cutter. In addition, the method comprises selecting a location on the rolling cone cutter for mounting a cutting insert having a base portion retained in the cone cutter and a cutting portion extending therefrom to cut a portion of the borehole bottom. Further, the method comprises selecting the diameter for the base portion. Still further, the method comprises selecting the extension height for the cutting portion. Moreover, the method comprises selecting the geometry of the cutting portion such that the cutting insert has a tip volume of at least 0.0010 in3.
These and other needs in the art are addressed in another embodiment by a rolling cone drill bit for drilling through earthen formations to form a borehole with a hole bottom and a sidewall. In an embodiment, the drill bit comprises at least one rolling cone cutter rotatably mounted on a bit body, the rolling cone cutter including a first surface generally facing the borehole bottom and a second surface generally facing the sidewall of the borehole. In addition, the drill bit comprises at least one cutter element mounted in the rolling cone cutter and secured in a position to cut against the borehole bottom, wherein the at least one cutter element including a cutter element axis, a base portion and a cutting portion extending from the base portion to a point furthermost from the base portion defining an extension height. Further, the at least one cutter element has a tip-to-base volume ratio of at least 0.30.
The inserts described herein are intended for hard and/or abrasive formations to provide enhanced ROP, durability and reduced wear rate relative to cutter elements having conventional shapes and geometries.
The embodiments described herein thus comprise a combination of features and characteristics intended to address various shortcomings of prior bits and inserts. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
For a more detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring first to
Referring now to
Referring still to
Extending between heel surface 44 and nose 42 is a generally conical surface 46 adapted for supporting cutter elements that gouge or crush the borehole bottom 7 as the cone cutters 14-16 rotate about the borehole. Conical surface 46 typically includes a plurality of generally frustoconical segments 48 generally referred to as “lands” which are employed to support and secure the cutter elements as described in more detail below. Grooves 49 are formed in cone surface 46 between adjacent lands 48. Frustoconical heel surface 44 and conical surface 46 converge in a circumferential edge or shoulder 50. Although referred to herein as an “edge” or “shoulder,” it should be understood that shoulder 50 may be contoured, such as a radius, to various degrees such that shoulder 50 will define a contoured zone of convergence between frustoconical heel surface 44 and the conical surface 46.
In the embodiment of the invention shown in
Inserts 60, 70, 80 each include a base portion and a cutting portion. The base portion of each insert 60, 70, 80 is disposed within a mating socket drilled into the cone steel of a rolling cone cutter 14-16. Each insert 60, 70, 80 may be secured within the mating socket by any suitable means including without limitation an interference fit, brazing, or combinations thereof. The cutting portion of an insert extends from the base portion of the insert and includes a cutting surface for cutting formation material. The present disclosure will be understood with reference to one such cone cutter 14, cone cutters 15, 16 being similarly, although not necessarily identically, configured.
Insert 100, suitable as an inner row or gage row cutter element, is shown in
Base portion 101 is the portion of insert 100 disposed within the mating socket provided in the cone steel of a cone cutter. Thus, as used herein, the term “base portion” refers to the portion of a cutter element or insert (e.g., insert 100) disposed within mating socket provided in the cone steel of a cone cutter (e.g., cone cutter 14). Further, as used herein, the term “cutting portion” refers to the portion of a cutter element or insert extending from the base portion. It should be understood that since the cutting portion extends from the base portion, and the base portion is disposed within the cone steel of a rolling cone cutter, the cutting portion represents the portion of the insert extending from the cone steel of the rolling cone cutter.
Insert 100 also includes a cutter element axis 103. In this embodiment, both base portion 101 and cutting portion 102 are symmetrical about any plane containing axis 103. Although cutting portion 102 and base portion 101 have a common axis 103 as shown in
Referring now to
Insert 100 is retained in the cone steel up to the plane of intersection 110, with the cutting portion 102 extending beyond the cone steel by an extension height E. Thus, as used herein, the term “extension,” “extension height,” or “extension height E” refers to the axial length of the extension of a cutting portion beyond the cone steel. Further, at least a portion of the surface of base portion 101 is coupled to the cone steel of the mating socket within which base portion 101 is disposed. Thus, as used herein, the term “grip,” “grip length,” or “grip G” refers to the axial length of the base portion of an insert that is coupled to the cone steel.
As shown in
In the embodiment illustrated in
For a better understanding of the terms “base portion,” “cutting portion,” “grip G,” and “extension height E,” reference will be made to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring still to
Referring to
As best shown in
As previously mentioned, certain conventional inner row inserts are substantially longer and sharper than the insert 100 shown in
To achieve the desired durability and cutting action, it is preferred that cutting portion 102 include side surfaces that taper away from cylindrical side surface 106 and inwardly toward cutting tip 112 but, at the same time, that cutting portion 102 include a relatively large cross-sectional area near cutting tip 112. For example, the embodiment of insert 100 shown in
The relatively blunt cutting surface 104 of insert 100 may also be described with reference to a volume of insert material in a segment of cutting portion 102 taken near cutting tip 112 as compared to a volume of insert material in a segment of base portion 101. More particularly, it is desired that the ratio of the volume of a 0.03 inch axial length of cutting portion 102 at cutting tip 112 to the volume of a 0.03 inch axial length of base portion 101 having a constant cross-sectional area fall within a particular range. Still more particularly, and as best shown in
As those skilled in the art understand, the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) has established a classification system for identifying bits that are suited for particular formations. Bits are usually specified in terms of an IADC nomenclature number which indicates the hardness and strength of the formation in which they are designed to be employed. The bit's IADC numeric nomenclature consists of a series of three numerals that are outlined within the “BITS” section of the current edition of the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Drilling Manual. The first numeral designates the bit's “series,” of which the numerals 1-3 are reserved for Milled Tooth Bits in the soft, medium and hard formations, and the numerals 4-8 are reserved for insert bits in the soft, medium, hard and extremely hard formations. The second numeral designates the bit's “type” within the series. The third numeral relates to the mounting arrangement of the roller cones and is generally not directly related to formation hardness or strength and consequently represented by an “x” when IADC codes are referred to herein. A higher “series” numeral indicates that the bit is capable of drilling in a harder formation than a bit with a lower series number. A higher “type” number indicates that the bit is capable of drilling in a harder formation than a bit of the same series with a lower type number. For example, a “5-2-x” IADC insert bit is capable of drilling in a harder formation than a “4-2-x” IADC insert bit. A “5-3-x” IADC insert bit is capable of drilling in harder formations than a “5-2-x” IADC insert bit. The IADC numeral classification system is subject to modification as approved by the International Association of Drilling Contractors to improve bit selection and usage. As used in herein, the phrase “IADC classification of at least Series 5” shall mean and include all IADC classifications of 5-0-x and harder.
It is also useful to describe the relatively blunt nature of cutting surface 104 of insert 100 with respect to the tip volume, or the volume of insert material in a 0.03 inch segment of insert 100 measured from cutting tip 112. In this regard for insert bits having the IADC classification 5-0-x and harder (including up to, for example, 8-0-x), the embodiment described above may have a tip volume of at least 0.0010 in3, and preferably has a tip volume greater than 0.0011 in3. The blunt nature of insert 100 can also be described by comparing the tip volume to the extension height E-to-diameter D ratio. The embodiment described above may have a tip volume of at least 0.0010 in3, and preferably has a tip volume greater than 0.0011 in3 for an insert (e.g., insert 100) having an extension height E-to-diameter D ratio not greater than 0.75
Without limiting the application of the insert 100 described above, it is believed that insert 100 is particularly well-suited for drilling in formation material having an unconfined compressive strength of between about 20-55 kpsi, or having a ratio of shear strength to compressive strength greater than about 1.1. In particular, the insert 100 described above is believed particularly suited for drilling in granites, sandstones, siltstones and conglomerates having unconfined compressive strength greater than about 20 kpsi and, more particularly, in formations encountered within the region generally known as the Unayzah field and Harweel Cluster.
Although portions 120, 121 and 122 of insert 100 have been shown and described as convex, one or more of these surfaces may be planar, concave or frustoconical. For example, tip portion 122 may be planar or slightly concave. Likewise, rather than having a positive radius, side portion 120 may be frustoconical such that, in a profile view as in
In comparison to the sharper conical or chisel shaped inserts typically employed in hard rock formations, insert 100 is relatively blunt. In other words, cutting tip 112 of insert 100 is broader and not as sharp as such conventional inner row cutter elements employed in hard rock formations. Providing a relatively blunt cutting surface and cutting tip on an inner row cutter element or insert for hard rock formation is counterintuitive given that it has been generally believed that a sharp cutting surface and cutting tip is necessary to penetrate hard formations such as granite and other materials having a high compressive strength. Despite its unconventional geometry for the application, the blunt tipped cutting element 100 has been shown to provide desirable ROP, durability, and reduced wear rate in hard rock formations.
Referring now to
In each embodiment of insert 200 shown in
Likewise, it is desired that each embodiment of insert 200 shown in
Referring now to
Cutting tip 412 includes an annular ridge or a lip 414 which encircles a generally circular-shaped planar surface 416. Cutting tip 412 further includes an annular sloping region 415 extending between the top of lip 414 and central planar surface 416. Given this geometry, cutting tip 412 includes a hollow region or void 418, and thus insert 400 may be described as a hollow point cutter element. It is preferred that the surfaces forming cutting surface 404 be continuously contoured to minimize undesirable stress concentrations. Lip 414, in conjunction with void 418, provides the potential for easier penetration into the formation (less penetration force required) as compared to a typical conical or even blunt chisel insert geometry which has limited surface area to penetrate and break the rock. At the same time, collectively, lip 414, annular sloping region 415 and planar surface 416 present a substantial surface area to gouge or crush the rock, potentially yielding a larger crater and increased overall ROP.
For use in hard and/or abrasive formations, it is preferred that insert 400 be constructed so as to have the extension height-to-diameter ratios, the tip-to-base volume ratios, the tip volumes and the ratios of cross-sectional areas (at 94% extension height and 75% extension height) as set out above in describing insert 200. In softer formations, a cutter element having the hollow region or void 418 in its cutting tip 412 may be employed without regard to the above-described geometric ratios.
Certain of the features and geometries previously described with reference to
More specifically, and referring now to
Cutting surface 304 also includes a wear face 334, trailing face 336, and leading and trailing transition surfaces 338, 339, respectively. Transition surfaces 338 and 339 are radiused, and blend the radius of tip portion 322 into wear face 334 and trailing face 336, respectively. Wear face 334 and trailing face 336 are contiguous and generally intersect at radiused intersection 337. Wear face 334 intersects side portion 320 in an arcuate cutting edge 340. Edge 340 is sharp relative to intersection 337, transition surfaces 338, 339, and relative to the other intersections that wear face 334 and trailing face 336 make with side portion 320. As best shown in the profile of
As used herein to describe a portion of a cutter element's cutting surface, the term “sharper” indicates that either (1) the angle defined by the intersection of two lines or planes or (2) the radius of curvature of a curved surface, is smaller than a comparable measurement on a portion of the cutting surface to which it is compared, or a combination of features (1) and (2). Eliminating abrupt changes in curvature or small radii between adjacent regions on the cutting surface lessens undesirable areas of high stress concentrations which can cause or contribute to premature cutter element breakage. It is preferred that the leading transition 338 be sharper than trailing transition surface 339 so as to optimize cutting efficiency of the borehole sidewall. However, depending upon the formation being drilled, the leading transition 338 may also be contoured or radiused more so as to make the intersection more dull to improve the durability. As used herein, the terms “contoured” or “sculpted” refer to cutting surfaces that can be described as continuously curved surfaces wherein relatively small radii (less than 0.080 inches) are used to break sharp edges or round off transitions between adjacent distinct surfaces as is typical with many conventionally-designed cutter elements. Although
Referring to the top view of
An enlarged view of cone cutter 16 is shown in
In the embodiments illustrated in
Referring now to
When placed in a cone cutter, such as cone cutter 16 shown in
As with the inserts previously described with reference to
It is also desired that inserts 300 and 500 include a substantial volume of insert material near cutting tip portion 322, 522, respectively. Accordingly, inserts 300 and 500 preferably have a ratio of cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 303, 503 taken at a distance of 94% of the extension height E to the cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 303, 503 taken through any portion cylindrical base portion 301, 501 having a constant cross-sectional area (e.g., taken through any portion of base portion 301, 501 having constant diameter D) of at least 0.30, and, more preferably, is at least 0.35. Still further, inserts 300 and 500 preferably have a ratio of cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 303, 503 taken at 75% of extension height E to cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 303, 503 taken through any portion of cylindrical base portion having a constant cross-sectional area (e.g., taken through any portion of base portion 301, 501 having constant diameter D) of at least 0.50.
Comparing 0.03 inch axial lengths, it is desired that the tip-to-base volume ratio of inserts 300 and 500 be at least 0.20 for drill bits being classified by IADC nomenclature as Series 5-0-x or harder bits, and more preferably, at least than 0.22. Further, for the insert bits having the IADC classification 5-0-X and harder, it is preferred that inserts 300 and 500 include a tip volume greater than 0.0010 in3, and preferably greater than 0.0015 in3. In particular, for an insert 300 (or 500) having a tip volume not less than 0.0010 in3, the insert preferably has an extension height E-to-diameter D ratio not greater than 0.65 and a tip volume greater than 0.0015 in3.
Referring now to
Although insert 600 has been shown as having a cutting surface 604 with a generally cylindrical side surface 620, cutting surface 604 may likewise have a frustoconical, outwardly bowed (convex), inwardly bowed (concave), or tapered side surface. Further, although insert 600 has been shown as having a cutting surface 604 with a substantially planar or flat tip surface 622, cutting surface 604 may likewise have a convex, concave, arcuate, symmetric or asymmetric tip surface. Still further, although cutting surface 604 of insert 600 illustrated in
For use in hard and/or abrasive formations, it is preferred that insert 600 have a relatively blunt cutting portion 602. Accordingly, insert 600 is preferably designed and manufactured so as to have a ratio of extension height E-to-diameter D of not greater than 0.65, and more preferably, not greater than 0.5. Further, it is also desired that insert 600 include a substantial volume of insert material near cutting tip portion 622. Accordingly, insert 600 preferably has a ratio of cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 603 taken at a distance of 94% of the extension height E to cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 603 taken through any portion of cylindrical base portion 601 having a constant cross-sectional area (e.g., taken through any portion of base portion 601 having a constant diameter D) of at least 0.30, and, more preferably, is at least 0.50. Still further, insert 600 preferably has a ratio of cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 603 taken at 75% of extension height E to cross-sectional area perpendicular to axis 603 taken through any portion of cylindrical base portion 601 having a constant cross-sectional area (e.g., taken through any portion of base portion 601 having a constant diameter D) of at least 0.50. In some extremely blunt embodiments of insert 600 (e.g., insert 600 has relatively little or no tapered side portions), one or both of the ratios of cross-sectional areas (at 94% extension height and 75% extension height) may be greater than 0.75.
Comparing 0.03 inch axial lengths, it is desired that the tip-to-base volume ratio of insert 600 be at least 0.20 for drill bits being classified by IADC nomenclature as Series 5-0-x or harder bits, and more preferably, at least than 0.22. In extremely blunt designs, the tip-to-base volume ratio maybe greater than 0.75. Further, for the insert bits having the IADC classification 5-0-X and harder, it is preferred that insert 600 include a tip volume greater than 0.0010 in3, and preferably greater than 0.0015 in3. In particular, for an insert 600 having a tip volume of at least 0.0010 in3, insert 600 preferably has an extension height E-to-diameter D ratio not greater than 0.65 and a tip volume greater than 0.0015 in3.
Referring now to
For use in hard and/or abrasive formations, it is preferred that insert 700 be designed and manufactured to have the extension height E-to-diameter D ratios, the tip-to-base volume ratios, the tip volumes and the ratios of cross-sectional areas (at 94% extension height and 75% extension height) as set out above in describing insert 600. It should be understood that since insert 700 includes tip surface 722 extends laterally beyond side surface 720, in some embodiments, the tip-to-base volume ratio of insert 700 may be greater than 1.0. Similarly, in some embodiments, the ratios of cross-sectional areas (at 94% extension height and/or 75% extension height) may be greater than 1.0.In softer formations, a cutter element or insert having a flat cutting tip surface 722 may be employed without regard to the above-described geometric ratios.
In the embodiments illustrated in
In comparison to cone cutters typically employed in hard rock formations that include sharper conical or chisel shaped cutting inserts in the gage row and inner rows, the inserts of cone cutter 916 are relatively blunt and have a relatively small extension height. Providing a relatively blunt cutting surface and cutting tip on inserts included in cone cutter 916 for hard rock formation is counterintuitive given that it has been generally believed that a sharp cutting surface and cutting tip is desirable to penetrate hard formations such as granite and other materials having a high compressive strength. Despite the unconventional geometry of the inserts in cone cutter 916, cone cutter 916 is intended to provide desirable ROP, durability, and reduced wear rate in hard rock formations. In addition, by employing inserts with a relatively small extension height, the amount of intermesh of cutter elements or inserts on adjacent rolling cone cutters of the same bit is reduced. Reduction in the amount of intermesh enables the use of larger cone cutters, larger bearings, and greater flexibility in the placement of inserts. When cone cutter 916 is employed in harder rock formations, it is preferred that at least some of inserts 980, 981, 982, 983 comprise a diamond or other super hard or super abrasive material.
Like insert 100, previously described, inserts 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 have relatively dull or blunt cutting surfaces in comparison to conventional inserts used in inner rows and some gage rows for cutting hard formations. As previously stated, it was traditionally believed that a relatively sharp cutting tip was advantageous to penetrate and remove hard rock material. By contrast, and counter intuitively, the cutter elements or inserts 200, 300, 400 and 500 employ more rounded and blunt cutting tips, yet are intended to provide favorable penetration rates and durability.
It is to be understood that the blunt nature of each cutter element or insert described herein is not strictly characterized, and hence is not strictly defined, by the particular shape of the cutter element or insert. For instance, although cutter elements or inserts (e.g., insert 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700) have been described herein as having a cylindrical base portion (e.g., base portion 101) with a generally circular cross-section, however, in general, the base portions of cutter elements or inserts designed in accordance with the principles described herein may have any suitable geometry including without limitation cylindrical, oval, or rectangular. Rather, the preferred blunt nature of each cutter element or insert described herein is characterized by one or more factors including without limitation the extension height-to-diameter ratios, the tip-to-base volume ratios, the tip volumes and the ratios of cross-sectional areas (at 94% extension height and 75% extension height), or combinations thereof.
Additional wear-resistance may be provided to the cutting inserts described herein. In particular, portions or all of the cutting surfaces of inserts 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 as examples, may be coated with diamond or other super-abrasive material in order to optimize (which may include compromising) cutting effectiveness and/or wear-resistance. Super abrasives are significantly harder than cemented tungsten carbide. As used herein, the term “super abrasive” means and includes polycrystalline diamond (PCD), cubic boron nitride (CBN), thermal stable diamond (TSP), polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN), and any other material having a material hardness of at least 2,700 Knoop (kg/mm2). As examples, PCD grades have a hardness range of about 5,000-8,000 Knoop (kg/mm2) while PCBN grades have hardnesses which fall within the general range of about 2,700-3,500 Knoop (kg/mm2). By way of comparison, conventional cemented tungsten carbide grades typically have a hardness of less than 1,500 Knoop (kg/mm2).
Certain methods of manufacturing cutting elements with PCD or PCBN coatings are well known. Examples of these methods are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,766,394, 4,604,106, 4,629,373, 4,694,918 and 4,811,801, the disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by this reference.
While preferred embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching herein. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the system and apparatus are possible. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2578593 | Phipps | Dec 1951 | A |
3388757 | Fittinger | Jun 1968 | A |
3442352 | McElya et al. | May 1969 | A |
3946820 | Knapp | Mar 1976 | A |
4056153 | Miglierini | Nov 1977 | A |
4058177 | Langford, Jr. et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4086973 | Keller et al. | May 1978 | A |
4108260 | Bozarth | Aug 1978 | A |
4334586 | Schumacher | Jun 1982 | A |
4352400 | Grappendorf et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4359113 | Morris | Nov 1982 | A |
4511006 | Grainger | Apr 1985 | A |
4586574 | Grappendorf | May 1986 | A |
4604106 | Hall et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4629373 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4694918 | Hall | Sep 1987 | A |
4716977 | Huffstutler | Jan 1988 | A |
4722405 | Langford, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4811801 | Salesky et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4832139 | Minikus et al. | May 1989 | A |
4951762 | Lundell | Aug 1990 | A |
D324527 | Slutz | Mar 1992 | S |
5131478 | Brett et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131481 | Smith | Jul 1992 | A |
5172777 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172779 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197555 | Estes | Mar 1993 | A |
5201376 | Williams | Apr 1993 | A |
5303787 | Brady | Apr 1994 | A |
5322138 | Siracki | Jun 1994 | A |
5323865 | Isbell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341890 | Cawthorne et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351768 | Scott et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5351770 | Cawthorne et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372210 | Harrell | Dec 1994 | A |
5379854 | Dennis | Jan 1995 | A |
5407022 | Scott et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415244 | Portwood | May 1995 | A |
5421423 | Huffstutler | Jun 1995 | A |
5421424 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429199 | Sheirer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5429200 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452771 | Blackman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467669 | Stroud | Nov 1995 | A |
5479997 | Scott et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5518077 | Blackman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535839 | Brady | Jul 1996 | A |
5542485 | Pessier et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560440 | Tibbits | Oct 1996 | A |
5592995 | Scott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5630479 | Dennis | May 1997 | A |
5636700 | Shamburger, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644956 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697462 | Grimes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709278 | Crawford | Jan 1998 | A |
5743346 | Flood et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746280 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752573 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755301 | Love et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766394 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813485 | Portwood | Sep 1998 | A |
5819861 | Scott et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833020 | Portwood et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839526 | Cisneros et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5871060 | Jensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874060 | Armour et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881828 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887655 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887668 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890550 | Swadi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915486 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5950745 | Ingmarsson | Sep 1999 | A |
5967245 | Garcia et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6029759 | Sue et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053263 | Meiners | Apr 2000 | A |
6059054 | Portwood et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105693 | Ingmarsson | Aug 2000 | A |
6105694 | Scott | Aug 2000 | A |
D430578 | Brady | Sep 2000 | S |
6119798 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6170583 | Boyce | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176332 | Massa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176333 | Doster | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196340 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199645 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202752 | Kuck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227318 | Siracki | May 2001 | B1 |
6241034 | Steinke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6367568 | Steinke et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6460636 | Yong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6561293 | Minikus et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6595305 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601662 | Matthias et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640913 | Lockstedt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6745645 | Griffo | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782959 | Minikus et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6883623 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883624 | McDonough | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7011169 | Eason | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7152703 | Meiners et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20010004026 | Lockstedt et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020108789 | Schautt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040149493 | Mcdonough | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163851 | McDonough et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173384 | Yong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050023043 | Tufts | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 391 683 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 446 765 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 527 506 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 902 159 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2 361 497 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2 369 841 | Jun 2002 | GB |
2 393 982 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2 398 830 | Aug 2004 | GB |
2087666 | Oct 1995 | RU |
2105124 | Feb 1998 | RU |
2153569 | Jul 2000 | RU |
WO 0161142 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060260846 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60681692 | May 2005 | US |