1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates to an improved method of determining, while drilling in the earth with a drill bit, the velocity of seismic signals and the positions of geologic formations in the earth. More particularly, it relates to a method for improving the quality of the acquired data.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventional reflection seismology utilizes surface sources and receivers to detect reflections from subsurface impedance contrasts. The obtained image often suffers in spatial accuracy, resolution and coherence due to the long travel paths between source, reflector, and receiver. In particular, due to the two-way passage of seismic signals through a highly absorptive near surface weathered layer with a low, laterally varying velocity, subsurface images are poor quality. To overcome this difficulty, a technique commonly known as vertical seismic profiling (VSP) was developed to image the subsurface in the vicinity of a borehole. With VSP, a surface seismic source is used and signals are received at a single downhole receiver or an array of downhole receivers. This is repeated for different depths of the receiver (or receiver array).
During drilling operations, the drillstring undergoes continuous vibrations. There are prior art methods and devices in which the drill bit itself is used as a seismic source and processing of signals received at a surface location is used for imaging of reflected signals from the earth formation. There are several major drawbacks with this method. The estimation of the source signal is done at the surface by using a sensor at or near the top of the drillstring, near the swivel. The source signal travels a long way through the drillstring enhanced estimation off the source signal may not be accurate. The present disclosure satisfies this need.
One embodiment of the disclosure is a method of evaluating an earth formation. The method includes: conveying a bottom hole assembly (BHA) into a borehole and using a drillbit for generating a seismic signal into the formation; receiving signals at least two spaced apart sensors on the BHA responsive to the generated acoustic signal; and using a downhole processor for: processing the received signals at the at least two spaced sensor and estimating the generated seismic signal.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is an apparatus configured to evaluate an earth formation. The apparatus includes: a bottom hole assembly (BHA) configured to be conveyed into a borehole; a drillbit configured to generate a seismic signal into the formation; at least two spaced apart sensors on the BHA responsive to the generated seismic signal; and a downhole processor configured to process the received signals at the at least two spaced sensor and estimate the generated seismic signal
Another embodiment of the disclosure is a non-transitory computer-readable medium product having thereon instructions that when read by a processor cause the processor to execute a method. The method comprising: receiving signals at least two spaced apart sensors on a bottomhole assembly (BHA) responsive to a seismic signal generated by a drillbit on the BHA; and processing the received signals at the at least two spaced sensors using an estimate of the generated acoustic signal and estimating a property of the earth formation.
The present disclosure is best understood with reference to the accompanying figures in which like numerals refer to like elements, and in which:
a shows raypaths used by the arrangement of
b shows travel times of raypaths from a reflector below the drill bit for the configuration of
The present disclosure is described with reference to acoustic sensors used in seismic while drilling methodology. However, this is not intended to be a limitation, and the method generally described herein can also be used with other types of sensor measurements.
During drilling operations, a suitable drilling fluid 31 from a mud pit (source) 32 is circulated under pressure through a channel in the drillstring 20 by a mud pump 34. The drilling fluid passes from the mud pump 34 into the drillstring 20 via a desurger (not shown), fluid line 28 and kelly joint 21. The drilling fluid 31 is discharged at the borehole bottom 51 through an opening in the drill bit 50. The drilling fluid 31 circulates uphole through the annular space 27 between the drillstring 20 and the borehole 26 and returns to the mud pit 32 via a return line 35. The drilling fluid acts to lubricate the drill bit 50 and to carry borehole cutting or chips away from the drill bit 50. A sensor S1 placed in the line 38 can provide information about the fluid flow rate. A surface torque sensor S2 and a sensor S3 associated with the drillstring 20 respectively provide information about the torque and rotational speed of the drillstring. Additionally, a sensor (not shown) associated with line 29 is used to provide the hook load of the drillstring 20.
In one embodiment of the disclosure, the drill bit 50 is rotated by only rotating the drill pipe 22. In another embodiment of the disclosure, a downhole motor 55 (mud motor) is disposed in the drilling assembly 90 to rotate the drill bit 50 and the drill pipe 22 is rotated usually to supplement the rotational power, if required, and to effect changes in the drilling direction.
In one embodiment of
In one embodiment of the disclosure, a drilling sensor module 59 is placed near the drill bit 50. The drilling sensor module contains sensors, circuitry and processing software and algorithms relating to the dynamic drilling parameters. Such parameters can include bit bounce, stick-slip of the drilling assembly, backward rotation, torque, shocks, borehole and annulus pressure, acceleration measurements and other measurements of the drill bit condition. A suitable telemetry or communication sub 72 using, for example, two-way telemetry, is also provided as illustrated in the drilling assembly 90. The drilling sensor module processes the sensor information and transmits it to the surface control unit 40 via the telemetry system 72.
The communication sub 72, a power unit 78 and an MWD tool 79 are all connected in tandem with the drillstring 20. Flex subs, for example, are used in connecting the MWD tool 79 in the drilling assembly 90. Such subs and tools form the bottom hole drilling assembly 90 between the drillstring 20 and the drill bit 50. The drilling assembly 90 makes various measurements including the pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance measurements while the borehole 26 is being drilled. The communication sub 72 obtains the signals and measurements and transfers the signals, using two-way telemetry, for example, to be processed on the surface. Alternatively, the signals can be processed using a downhole processor at a suitable location (not shown) in the drilling assembly 90.
The surface control unit or processor 40 also receives signals from other downhole sensors and devices and signals from sensors S1-S3 and other sensors used in the system 10 and processes such signals according to programmed instructions provided to the surface control unit 40. The surface control unit 40 displays desired drilling parameters and other information on a display/monitor 42 utilized by an operator to control the drilling operations. The surface control unit 40 can include a computer or a microprocessor-based processing system, memory for storing programs or models and data, a recorder for recording data, and other peripherals. The control unit 40 can be adapted to activate alarms 44 when certain unsafe or undesirable operating conditions occur.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the seismic source and the seismic receivers are both in a downhole position. This is illustrated in
Those versed in the art and having benefit of the present disclosure would recognize that during drilling operations, the acoustic signal produced by the drill bit 250 is by its very nature unpredictable. One purpose of the two proximal detectors 301 and 303 is to produce an estimate of the acoustic signal that is actually generated by the drill string and the velocity of the acoustic signal.
Turning now to
Those versed in the art and having benefit of the present disclosure would recognize that the signals 401 and/or 403 may give an unreliable estimate of the source signal. The reason simply is that there are events with different travel time moveouts on the two (or more) traces. In one embodiment of the disclosure, the source signal is estimated by shifting and averaging the recorded signals 401 and 403 using the known velocity of compressional waves in steel. It should be noted that this is likely to be the strongest signal recorded by the receivers.
Processing of the recorded signal may be done at a downhole location. The processing may include a crosscorrelation between the estimated source signal and the recorded signals signals 401 and 403. The result of this crosscorrelation has been discussed above with respect to
In one embodiment of the disclosure, the peaks of the correlograms are detected using, for example, a differentiator. The correlogram, or a part of it, may be compressed and transmit it to the surface by mud pulse telemetry.
In one embodiment of the disclosure, the location of an interface ahead of the drill bit may be determined. This is schematically illustrated in
In another embodiment of the disclosure, an array of sensors at the surface, similar to that shown by 217 in
Turning now to
As a specific example, when the borehole axis is parallel to the reflector, measurements at two different source to receive distances are sufficient to estimate the formation velocity and the distance from the borehole to the interface boundary. In this case, the time distance relationship is given by:
Where z is the source-receiver distance and V is the velocity.
In one embodiment of the disclosure, the drillbit may be provided with a piezoelectric transducer. This is illustrated in
In another embodiment of the disclosure, an array of seismic receivers at the surface is used for processing reflections of seismic signals generated by the drill bit. This is schematically illustrated in
The acquisition and processing of measurements made by the transducer may be controlled at least in part by downhole electronics (not shown). Implicit in the control and processing of the data is the use of a computer program on a suitable machine readable-medium that enables the processors to perform the control and processing. The machine-readable medium may include ROMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memories and optical disks. The term processor is intended to include devices such as a field programmable gate array (FPGA).
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the specific embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/093,326 and 13/093,289 filed on Apr. 25, 2011, with priority claims to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/408,106 filed on Oct. 29, 2010; a priority claim to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/408,144 on Oct. 29, 2010; and a priority claim to U.S. provisional patent application 61/408,119 filed on Oct. 29, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4645977 | Kurokawa et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4707384 | Schachner et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4849945 | Widrow | Jul 1989 | A |
4862423 | Rector | Aug 1989 | A |
4926391 | Rector et al. | May 1990 | A |
4954998 | Rector | Sep 1990 | A |
4964087 | Widrow | Oct 1990 | A |
4965774 | Ng et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4976324 | Tibbitts | Dec 1990 | A |
5012453 | Katz | Apr 1991 | A |
5066938 | Kobashi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5109947 | Rector, III | May 1992 | A |
5144591 | Hardage | Sep 1992 | A |
5317302 | Yamazaki | May 1994 | A |
5337844 | Tibbitts | Aug 1994 | A |
5372207 | Naville et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5438860 | Kawai et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5467320 | Maki, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5511038 | Angeleri et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512873 | Saito et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523121 | Anthony et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5585556 | Petersen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5706906 | Jurewicz et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5881830 | Cooley | Mar 1999 | A |
5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6068070 | Scott | May 2000 | A |
6078868 | Dubinsky | Jun 2000 | A |
6151554 | Rodney | Nov 2000 | A |
6193001 | Eyre et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6262941 | Naville | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274403 | Klages et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6540033 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564883 | Fredericks et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571886 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6626251 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6892836 | Eyre et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7168506 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7338202 | Kapat et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350568 | Mandal et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398837 | Hall et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7451838 | Keshavan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7697375 | Reiderman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7730967 | Ballantyne et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7946357 | Trinh et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8122980 | Hall et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8210280 | Trinh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8215384 | Trinh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8250786 | Hall et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8316964 | Hall et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20030192721 | Singh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040011567 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040240320 | McDonald et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050067191 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050230149 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279532 | Ballantyne et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018360 | Tai et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060065395 | Snell | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060175057 | Mandal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070029116 | Keshavan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056171 | Taryoto | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107938 | Cornish et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114061 | Hall et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114062 | Hall et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070263488 | Clark | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090057033 | Keshavan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090114628 | DiGiovanni | May 2009 | A1 |
20100089645 | Trinh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101861 | Chang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118657 | Trinh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155142 | Thambynayagam et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100307835 | Glasgow et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315901 | Coman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319994 | Wiercigroch | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322020 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326731 | Swietlik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110139507 | Krueger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168446 | Lemenager et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110253448 | Trinh et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266054 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110266055 | DiGiovanni et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110266058 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120000707 | Hall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024600 | Bittar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037423 | Geerits et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120080229 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120103688 | Coman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132468 | Scott et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120279783 | Trinh et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120312598 | Cheng | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120312599 | Trinh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325564 | Vaughn et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130068525 | DiGiovanni | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000225511 | Aug 2000 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Battaglia, J. et al., “Estimation of Heat Fluxes During High-Speed Drilling,” Int. Jnl. Adv. Manf. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 750-758(2005). |
Zhang, X. et al., “Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of Metal Embedded Microphotonic Sensors,” Jnl. Manuf. Sci. Eng., vol. 130, No. 3, 031104 (2008). |
Cheng, X. et al., “Development of Metal Embedded Microsensors by Diffusion Bonding and Testing in Milling Process,” Jnl. Manuf. Sci. Eng., vol. 130, No. 6, 061010 (2008). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120103688 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61408106 | Oct 2010 | US | |
61408144 | Oct 2010 | US | |
61408119 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13093326 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13219958 | US | |
Parent | 13093289 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13093326 | US |