Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The invention relates generally to earth-boring bits used to drill a borehole for the ultimate recovery of oil, gas or minerals. More particularly, the invention relates to rolling cone rock bits and to an improved cutting structure for such bits.
An earth-boring drill bit is typically mounted on the lower end of a drill string and is rotated by rotating the drill string at the surface or by actuation of downhole motors or turbines, or by both methods. With weight applied to the drill string, the rotating drill bit engages the earthen formation and proceeds to form a borehole along a predetermined path toward a target zone. The borehole formed in the drilling process will have a diameter generally equal to the diameter or “gage” of the drill bit.
A typical earth-boring bit includes one or more rotatable cutters that perform their cutting function due to the rolling movement of the cutters acting against the formation material. The cutters roll and slide upon the bottom of the borehole as the bit is rotated, the cutters thereby engaging and disintegrating the formation material in its path. The rotatable cutters may be described as generally conical in shape and are therefore sometimes referred to as rolling cones or rolling cone cutters. The borehole is formed as the gouging and scraping or crushing and chipping action of the rotary cones remove chips of formation material which are carried upward and out of the borehole by drilling fluid which is pumped downwardly through the drill pipe and out of the bit.
The earth disintegrating action of the rolling cone cutters is enhanced by providing the cutters with a plurality of cutter elements. Cutter elements are generally of two types: inserts formed of a very hard material, such as tungsten carbide, that are press fit into undersized apertures in the cone surface; or teeth that are milled, cast or otherwise integrally formed from the material of the rolling cone. Bits having tungsten carbide inserts are typically referred to as “TCI” bits or “insert” bits, while those having teeth formed from the cone material are known as “steel tooth bits.” In each instance, the cutter elements on the rotating cutters break up the formation to form a new borehole by a combination of gouging and scraping or chipping and crushing.
In oil and gas drilling, the cost of drilling a borehole is proportional to the length of time it takes to drill to the desired depth and location. The time required to drill the well, in turn, is greatly affected by the number of times the drill bit must be changed in order to reach the targeted formation. This is the case because each time the bit is changed, the entire string of drill pipe, which may be miles long, must be retrieved from the borehole, section by section. Once the drill string has been retrieved and the new bit installed, the bit must be lowered to the bottom of the borehole on the drill string, which again must be constructed section by section. As is thus obvious, this process, known as a “trip” of the drill string, requires considerable time, effort and expense. Accordingly, it is always desirable to employ drill bits which will drill faster and longer and which are usable over a wider range of formation hardness.
The length of time that a drill bit may be employed before it must be changed depends upon its rate of penetration (“ROP”), as well as its durability. The form and positioning of the cutter elements upon the cone cutters greatly impact bit durability and ROP, and thus are critical to the success of a particular bit design.
Bit durability is, in part, measured by a bit's ability to “hold gage,” meaning its ability to maintain a full gage borehole diameter over the entire length of the borehole. Gage holding ability is particularly vital in directional drilling applications which have become increasingly important. If gage is not maintained at a relatively constant dimension, it becomes more difficult, and thus more costly, to insert drilling apparatus into the borehole than if the borehole had a constant diameter. For example, when a new, unworn bit is inserted into an undergage borehole, the new bit will be required to ream the undergage hole as it progresses toward the bottom of the borehole. Thus, by the time it reaches the bottom, the bit may have experienced a substantial amount of wear that it would not have experienced had the prior bit been able to maintain full gage. Such wear will shorten the life of the newly-inserted bit, thus prematurely requiring the time consuming and expensive process of removing the drill string, replacing the worn bit, and reinstalling another new bit downhole.
To assist in maintaining the gage of a borehole, conventional rolling cone bits typically employ a heel row of hard metal inserts on the heel surface of the rolling cone cutters. The heel surface is a generally frustoconical surface and is configured and positioned so as to generally align with and ream the sidewall of the borehole as the bit rotates. The inserts in the heel surface contact the borehole wall with a sliding motion and thus generally may be described as scraping or reaming the borehole sidewall. The heel inserts function primarily to maintain a constant gage and secondarily to prevent the erosion and abrasion of the heel surface of the rolling cone. Excessive wear of the heel inserts leads to an undergage borehole, decreased ROP, increased loading on the other cutter elements on the bit, and may accelerate wear of the cutter bearing, and ultimately lead to bit failure.
Conventional bits also typically include one or more rows of gage cutter elements. Gage row elements are mounted adjacent to the heel surface but orientated and sized in such a manner so as to cut the corner of the borehole. In this orientation, the gage cutter elements generally are required to cut both the borehole bottom and sidewall. The lower surface of the gage row cutter elements engage the borehole bottom while the radially outermost surface (the surface most distant from the bit axis) scrapes the sidewall of the borehole. Gage row cutter elements have taken a number of forms, including cutter elements having relatively sharp and aggressive cutting portions. For examples, FIGS. 1, 3A in U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,768 disclose the use of sharp, chisel-shaped inserts 51 in the position referred to herein as the “gage row.” However, in at least certain hard or abrasive formations, cutter elements having sharp and/or relatively long cutting portions may tend to break or wear prematurely.
Conventional bits also include a number of additional rows of cutter elements that are located on the cones in rows disposed radially inward from the gage row. These cutter elements are sized and configured for cutting the bottom of the borehole and are typically described as inner row cutter elements. In many applications, inner row cutter elements are relatively long and sharper than those typically employed in the gage row or the heel row where the inserts ream the sidewall of the borehole and cut formation via a scraping or shearing action. By contrast, the inner row cutters are intended to penetrate and remove formation material by gouging and fracturing formation material. Consequently, particularly in softer formations, it is desirable that the inner row inserts have a relatively large extension height above the cone steel to facilitate rapid removal of formation material from the bottom of the borehole. However, in hard formations, such longer extensions make the inserts more susceptible to failure due to breakage. Thus, in hard formations, inner row cutter elements commonly have shorter extensions than where employed in soft formation. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon to employ relatively sharp geometry on the inserts in the hard rock formations in order to better penetrate the formation material.
Common cutter shapes for inner row and gage row inserts for hard formations are traditional chisel and conical shapes. Although such inserts with shorter extensions have generally avoided breakage problems associated with longer and more aggressive inserts, and although the relativity sharp chisel and conical shapes provide reasonable rates of penetration and bit life, they tend wear at a fast rate in hard abrasive formations because of the sharp tip geometry which reduces the footage drilled. Increasing ROP while maintaining good cutter and bit life to increase the footage drilled is still an important goal so as to decrease drilling time and the enormous costs associated with drilling, and to thereby recover valuable oil and gas more economically.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a drill bit and cutting structure that, in relatively hard and/or highly abrasive formations, will provide an increase in ROP and footage drilled, while maintaining a full gage borehole.
Accordingly, there is provided herein a rolling cone drill bit and a cutter element for use in such bit where, in certain embodiments, the cutter element includes a generally planar top surface or wear face that is generally polygonal in shape and that slopes from a peak toward the cutter element base, the cutting portion of the cutter element including a faceted side surface having three or more facets extending between the base and the wear face. The wear face may be triangular, trapezoidal, rectangular or other polygonal shape and, depending upon the application, is preferred to slope relative to the cutter element axis at an angle of between about 40° and 80°. The intersection of the wear face and the faceted side surface forms a radiused edge that extends around the perimeter of the wear face. Preferably, the polygonal shape includes rounded corners. In certain embodiments, the rounded corners will differ in radius with one or more of the corners being sharper than others. Preferably, the cutting surface of the cutter element is tapered in all profile views. Also, to provide the desired polygonal-shaped wear face, the facets are generally planar in certain embodiments. However, in other embodiments, the facets may be slightly convex or slightly concave, thereby providing corners with differing degrees of sharpness compared to the cutting surface having planar facets.
In certain embodiments, the cutter element is mounted in a rolling cone of a drill bit and is oriented such that the wear face generally faces the borehole sidewall when the cutter element is in its lowermost position, i.e., the position where the cutter element is farthest from the bit axis. In certain embodiments, the corners of the polygonal cutting face that are closest to the borehole sidewall and farthest from the bit axis are formed to be sharper than the corners positioned in other locations. In this manner, as the rolling cone cutter rotates and the insert first engages the borehole sidewall, the sidewall will be attacked first by a relatively sharp corner and the bottom of the borehole engaged by a corner having a more rounded or blunt edge so as to resist breakage in relatively hard formations.
In certain embodiments described herein, the cutter element will include a ratio of extension height to diameter of not greater than 0.75. The combination of sloping polygonal-shaped wear face, in combination with a moderate extension height, provides a relatively broad and breakage-resistant wear face for reaming the borehole sidewall, but one with corners and edges desirable for shearing enhancement as the insert first engages formation material. The relatively short extension height, relative to conventional and longer chisel-shaped and conical inserts, is intended to provide a robust and breakage-resistant element.
The embodiments described herein thus comprise a combination of features and characteristics intended to address various shortcomings of prior bits and inserts. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
For a more detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring first to
Referring now to
Referring still to
Extending between heel surface 44 and nose 42 is a generally conical surface 46 adapted for supporting cutter elements that gouge or crush the borehole bottom 7 as the cone cutters 14-16 rotate about the borehole. Conical surface 46 typically includes a plurality of generally frustoconical segments 48 generally referred to as “lands” which are employed to support and secure the cutter elements as described in more detail below. Grooves 49 are formed in cone surface 46 between adjacent lands 48. Frustoconical heel surface 44 and conical surface 46 converge in a circumferential edge or shoulder 50. Although referred to herein as an “edge” or “shoulder,” it should be understood that shoulder 50 may be contoured, such as a radius, to various degrees such that shoulder 50 will define a contoured zone of convergence between frustoconical heel surface 44 and the conical surface 46.
In the embodiment of the invention shown in
Inserts 60, 70, 80-82 each include a base portion and a cutting portion. The base portion of each insert is disposed within a mating socket drilled or otherwise formed in the cone steel of a rolling cone cutter 14-16. Each insert may be secured within the mating socket by any suitable means including without limitation an interference fit, brazing, or combinations thereof. The cutting portion of an insert extends from the base portion of the insert and includes a cutting surface for cutting formation material. The present disclosure will be understood with reference to one such cone cutter 14, cone cutters 15, 16 being similarly, although not necessarily identically, configured.
Cutter element insert 100 is shown in
Base portion 101 is the portion of insert 100 disposed within the mating socket provided in the cone steel of a cone cutter. Thus, as used herein, the term “base portion” refers to the portion of a cutter element or insert (e.g., insert 100) disposed within mating socket provided in the cone steel of a cone cutter (e.g., cone cutter 14). Further, as used herein, the term “cutting portion” refers to the portion of a cutter element or insert extending from the base portion. It should be understood that since the cutting portion extends from the base portion, and the base portion is disposed within the cone steel of a rolling cone cutter, the cutting portion is that portion of the insert extending beyond the cone steel of the rolling cone cutter.
Base portion 101 is generally cylindrical and includes central axis 107, bottom surface 104 and a substantially cylindrical side surface 106 extending upwardly therefrom. The cylindrical side surface 106 and the bottom surface 104 intersect at a chamfered corner 108 which facilitates insertion and mounting of insert 100 into the receiving aperture formed in the cone steel. Base portion 101 and insert 100 as a whole include a diameter D as shown. Although base portion 101 is cylindrical having a circular cross-section in this embodiment, base portion 101 may likewise have a non-circular cross-section (e.g., cross-section of the base portion 101 may be oval, rectangular, asymmetric, etc.).
Insert 100 is retained in the cone steel up to the plane of intersection 110, with the cutting portion 102 extending beyond the cone steel by an extension height E. Thus, as used herein, the term “extension,” “extension height,” or “extension height E” refers to the axial length that a cutting portion extends beyond the cone steel. Further, at least a portion of the surface of base portion 101 is coupled to the cone steel of the mating socket within which base portion 101 is retained. Thus, as used herein, the term “grip,” “grip length,” or “grip G” refers to the axial length of the base portion of an insert that is coupled to the cone steel.
Cutting surface 103 includes a generally flat or planar polygonal-shaped top surface 112, faceted side surfaced 114, and peak 122. The faceted side surface 114 extends from base 101 to top surface 112 and includes, in this embodiment, three generally planar surfaces, best described as facets 117-119. Having three facets, the cutting surface 103, in this embodiment, forms a top surface 112 that is generally triangular-shaped, as best shown in the top view of
Top surface 112, which may also be referred to herein as a “wear face,” is generally bounded by lower radiused edge 124 that is opposite from peak 122, and a pair of radiused edges 126, each of which extends between one end of lower radiused edge 124 and peak 122. Radiused edges 124, 126 form a radiused transition 116 which forms the perimeter of top surface 112 and blends or transitions cutting surface 103 between the faceted side surface 114 and top surface 112. As measured between side surface 114 and top surface 112, the radius of edges 124, 126 is approximately 0.050 inches in this example for insert 100 having a diameter D of approximately 0.5 inches and an extension height H of approximately 0.780 inches. Eliminating abrupt changes in curvature or small radii between adjacent regions on the cutting surface lessens undesirable areas of high stress concentrations which can cause or contribute to premature cutter element breakage. Accordingly, the cutting surface 103 is continuously contoured or sculpted to reduce such high stress concentrations. As used herein, the terms “continuously contoured” or “sculpted” refer to cutting surfaces that can be described as continuously curved surfaces wherein relatively small radii (less than 0.080 inches) are used to break sharp edges or round off transitions between adjacent distinct surfaces as is typical with many conventionally-designed cutter elements.
Facets 117-119 are generally planar, but need not be absolutely flat. For example, facets 117-119 may be slightly convex or slightly concave as described below. Given the substantially planar facets 117-119 of this embodiment, the intersection of facets 117-119 with generally flat top surface 112 provide edge segments 124, 126 that extend generally linearly. Faceted side surface 114 further includes transitional corner surfaces 120, 121. One such transitional corner surface 120 extends between facets 117 and 118 and another between facets 118 and 119. Transitional corner surface 121 extends between facets 117 and 119. As shown in
Top surface 112 slopes between peak 122 and lower radiused edge 124 along reference plane 130 and thereby intersects insert axis 107 at an angle α that is preferably an angle other than 90°. In the embodiment shown in
The generally triangular top surface or wear face 112 has rounded corners 128 at the intersection of lower edge 124 and edge 126, and a rounded corner 129 at the intersection of edges 126, adjacent to peak 122. In this example, and as best shown in
As best shown in the profile view of
Cutting portion 102 is relatively blunt and less aggressive compared to certain conventional inner row and gage inserts which include much longer, sharper, or more pointed cutting tips. In this specific example, the extension height E of insert 100 is approximately 0.3 inches, such that the ratio of extension height E-to-diameter D is 0.6. It is preferred that insert 100 have a ratio of extension height E-to-diameter D not greater than 0.75 and, more preferably, not greater than 0.65. As previously mentioned, certain conventional gage and inner row inserts are substantially longer and sharper than the insert 100 shown in
Certain of the features and geometries previously described with reference to
An enlarged view of rolling cone cutter 14 is shown in
Additional wear-resistance may be provided to the cutting inserts described herein. In particular, portions or all of the cutting surfaces of inserts 100 as examples, may be coated with diamond or other super-abrasive material in order to optimize (which may include compromising) cutting effectiveness and/or wear-resistance. Super abrasives are significantly harder than cemented tungsten carbide. As used herein, the term “super abrasive” means and includes polycrystalline diamond (PCD), cubic boron nitride (CBN), thermal stable diamond (TSP), polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN), and any other material having a material hardness of at least 2,700 Knoop (kg/mm2). As examples, PCD grades have a hardness range of about 5,000-8,000 Knoop (kg/mm2) while PCBN grades have hardnesses which fall within the general range of about 2,700-3,500 Knoop (kg/mm2). By way of comparison, conventional cemented tungsten carbide grades typically have a hardness of less than 1,500 Knoop (kg/mm2). In certain embodiments, the entire cutting surface 103 is coated with a superabrasive. In other embodiments, top surface 112 includes superabrasive, but the faceted side surface does not. Certain methods of manufacturing cutting elements with PCD or PCBN coatings are well known. Examples of these methods are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,766,394, 4,604,106, 4,629,373, 4,694,918, and 4,811,801, the disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by this reference.
Referring now to
Referring now to
By varying angle α, or by varying the width of the facets, or by varying the angular position of the facets about the cutting surfaces, or by various of these techniques, the shape of the polygonal top cutting surface 112, 212, 312 described herein can be altered. By way of example only, decreasing angle α (
Referring to
Another cutter element 500 is shown in
In each of these examples, the top cutting surface 412, 512 still possesses what may be described as a generally triangular shape. As discussed with reference to
An insert such as that shown in
While preferred embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching herein. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the system and apparatus are possible. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2578593 | Phipps | Dec 1951 | A |
3388757 | Fittinger | Jun 1968 | A |
3442352 | McElya et al. | May 1969 | A |
3946820 | Knapp | Mar 1976 | A |
4056153 | Miglierini | Nov 1977 | A |
4058177 | Langford, Jr. et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4086973 | Keller et al. | May 1978 | A |
4108260 | Bozarth | Aug 1978 | A |
4334586 | Schumacher | Jun 1982 | A |
4352400 | Grappendorf et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4359113 | Morris | Nov 1982 | A |
4511006 | Grainger | Apr 1985 | A |
4586574 | Grappendorf | May 1986 | A |
4604106 | Hall et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4629373 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4694918 | Hall | Sep 1987 | A |
4716977 | Huffstutler | Jan 1988 | A |
4722405 | Langford, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4763737 | Hellnick | Aug 1988 | A |
4811801 | Salesky et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4832139 | Minikus et al. | May 1989 | A |
4951762 | Lundell | Aug 1990 | A |
D324527 | Slutz | Mar 1992 | S |
5131478 | Brett et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131481 | Smith | Jul 1992 | A |
5172777 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172779 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197555 | Estes | Mar 1993 | A |
5201376 | Williams | Apr 1993 | A |
5303787 | Brady | Apr 1994 | A |
5322138 | Siracki | Jun 1994 | A |
5323865 | Isbell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341890 | Cawthorne et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351768 | Scott et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5351770 | Cawthorne et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372210 | Harrell | Dec 1994 | A |
5379854 | Dennis | Jan 1995 | A |
5407022 | Scott et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415244 | Portwood | May 1995 | A |
5421423 | Huffstutler | Jun 1995 | A |
5421424 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429199 | Sheirer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5429200 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452771 | Blackman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467669 | Stroud | Nov 1995 | A |
5479997 | Scott et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5518077 | Blackman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535839 | Brady | Jul 1996 | A |
5542485 | Pessier et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560440 | Tibbitts | Oct 1996 | A |
5592995 | Scott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5636700 | Shamburger, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644956 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697462 | Grimes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709278 | Crawford | Jan 1998 | A |
5743346 | Flood et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746280 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752573 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755301 | Love et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766394 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813485 | Portwood | Sep 1998 | A |
5819861 | Scott et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833020 | Portwood et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839526 | Cisneros et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5871060 | Jensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874060 | Armour et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881828 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887655 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887668 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890550 | Swadi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915486 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5950745 | Ingmarsson | Sep 1999 | A |
5967245 | Garcia et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6029759 | Sue et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053263 | Meiners | Apr 2000 | A |
6059054 | Portwood et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105693 | Ingmarsson | Aug 2000 | A |
6105694 | Scott | Aug 2000 | A |
D430578 | Brady | Sep 2000 | S |
6119798 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6176332 | Massa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176333 | Doster | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196340 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199645 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202752 | Kuck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241034 | Steinke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241035 | Portwood | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6367568 | Steinke et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6561293 | Minikus et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6595305 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601662 | Matthias et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6745645 | Griffo | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782959 | Minikus et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6883623 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883624 | McDonough | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7011169 | Eason | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010004026 | Lockstedt et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020108789 | Schautt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040084223 | Richman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094334 | Singh | May 2004 | A1 |
20040149493 | McDonough | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163851 | McDonough et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173384 | Yong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050023043 | Tufts | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 391 683 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 446 765 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 527 506 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 902 159 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2 361 497 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2 369 841 | Jun 2002 | GB |
2 393 982 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2 398 330 | Aug 2004 | GB |
2105124 | Feb 1998 | RU |
2153569 | Jul 2000 | RU |
WO 9748874 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 0161142 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080053710 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |