Drill bit

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9333564
  • Patent Number
    9,333,564
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 19, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
An elongated drill bit has a shank at one end and working end at the other. A flute portion is between the working end and the shank. The flute portion is continuous with the shank and working end and is generally unitarily formed with them. The flute portion has at least one flute with a helix angle between approximately 30° and 35°. The working end has a pilot tip with a cutting portion. A tapered web is formed in the flute portion, a thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is about 9% to 15% of the nominal diameter.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present application relates to drill bits and, more particularly, to drill bits including a pilot tip to bore through wood, metal and plastics.


BACKGROUND

One of the most commonly used drill bits to drill through metal is a twist drill formed with a chisel edge at the working end of the drill bit. The chisel edge is formed perpendicular to the axis of the drill bit and usually extends across the small portion of the drill bit diameter. Also, the chisel edge extends equally on opposite sides of the drill bit axis. A cutting edge extends from each opposite end of the chisel edge and tapers axially rearwardly to the outer periphery of the drill bit diameter. In use, the chisel edge is the first portion of the drill bit to engage a workpiece. The chisel edge engages the workpiece and works and extrudes the material in the intermediate vicinity rather than forming chips swarf, sawdust and the like for extraction. A work material enables the drill bit to begin to move into the material of the workpiece whereby the cutting edges begin to cut the material to form removable chips which are discharged via helical flutes running axially rearwardly from the chisel edge and the cutting edges.


While a drill bit with a chisel edge is satisfactory for some drilling operations, it does not provide holes with accurately located centers or round holes. For example, it tends to skip away from the desired location of the hole as a rotating chisel edge engages the workpiece. Further, in the out of round characteristics of the drill bit or tool holder connected to the shank of the drill bit is transmitted to the working end while drilling the hole.


European Patent Publication No. EP0315643 discloses a drill bit having a pilot tip which extends axially ahead of an outer cutting portion. The pilot tip has a smaller diameter than the outer cutting portion. In use, the pilot tip cuts a pilot hole which self-centers the drill bit. Next, the outer cutting portion cuts a main hole in the workpiece which corresponds to the diameter of the drill bit.


A drill bit sold by the Applicant also has a pilot tip which extends axially ahead of an outer cutting portion. The pilot tip has a “split point” cutting edge arrangement to cut the self-centering pilot hole and the outer cutting portion has a pair of major cutting edges arranged on opposite sides of the axis to cut the primary hole. The split point has two inner minor cutting edges arranged on opposite sides of the axis. The two inner minor cutting edges are spaced apart and connected at the extreme tip of the split point by a slight chisel edge. The split point also has an outer minor cutting edge that extends from the end of each inner minor cutting edge and tapers axially rearward to the outer periphery of the pilot tip. In use, the two inner minor cutting edges engage a workpiece to initiate the drilling operation slightly in advance of the engagement of the workpiece by the outer minor cutting edges. The chisel edge does not work or extrude the material in its immediate vicinity, like in the case of the common twist drill mentioned above, because the chisel edge is insignificantly small. The chips created by the inner and the outer minor cutting edges are separate from each other and are therefore smaller in size.


Once the pilot tip begins drilling the self-centering pilot hole, the major cutting edges of the outer cutting portion engage the workpiece and create chips which are also separate from those created by the minor cutting edges of the pilot tip. This arrangement produces smaller chips during the drilling operation which, in turn, reduces resistance to the passage of the drill bit through the workpiece as the drilling process progresses. The drill bit has debris channels in the form of a pair of helical flutes to transport the chips away from the cutting edges and out of the hole being drilled in the workpiece. Smaller chips are naturally easier to convey along the flutes and are less likely to clog up the flutes. A clogged flute creates the problem of significantly increased resistance to the passage of the drill bit through the workpiece. Deeper flutes transport such chips and other debris more easily and are less prone to clogging. However, deeper flutes also result in a thinner web that reduces the strength of the dill bit. A compromise is met by a web that tapers radially outwardly and axially rearward from the pilot tip of the working end towards the drill bit shank. This provides deeper flutes in the region of the working end where efficient debris removal is most important. Also, it provides a thicker web towards the shank where robustness is important. The prior art drill bit has a tapering web with a thickness increasing from the tip portion to the shank portion at a uniform taper rate. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,050,754, 6,190,097, 7,267,514 7,520,703, and 8,470,515 each of which is assigned to Applicant, and each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, this application relates to a drill bit having a thinner web thickness at its tip and a smaller helix angle to improve pull-through, drilling life and efficiency.


According to another aspect, an elongated drill bit with a longitudinal axis and a nominal diameter comprises a shank at one end and a working end is the other end. A flute portion is formed between the shank and the working end. The shank, working end, and flute portion are continuous with one another and are generally unitarily formed. The working end comprises a pilot tip with a cutting portion. The flute portion includes a tapered web that has a web thickness at the working tip of about 7% to 20% of the nominal diameter at the tip of the working end. Also, the flute portion includes a helix angle of from about 30° to 35°.


Implementations of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. A second cutting portion may be formed at a terminus of the flute portion axially spaced from the pilot tip first cutting portion. The second cutting portion may include a pair of cutting edges on opposed sides of the pilot tip.


According to another aspect, an elongated drill bit with a longitudinal axis includes a shank at one end having a nominal diameter, a working end at an opposite end, and a flute portion between the shank and the working end. The shank, the working end and the flute portion re continuous with one another. The flute portion includes a helix angle of approximately 30° to 35°. The working end includes a pilot tip with a first cutting portion and a second cutting portion axially spaced from the first cutting portion. The second cutting portion is at a terminus of the flute portion and includes a pair of cutting edges on opposing sides of the pilot tip. A tapered web is formed in the flute portion. A thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is approximately 9% to 15% of the nominal diameter.


Implementations of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. The drill bit may have: (a) a nominal diameter of ¼ inch or less and the thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is approximately 13% to 15% of the nominal diameter; (b) a nominal diameter between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch the thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is approximately 11% to 13% of the nominal diameter; or (c) a nominal diameter greater than or equal to 11/32 inch and the thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is approximately 9% to 10% of the nominal diameter. The drill bit may have: (a) a nominal diameter of 17/64 inch or less and the web thickness at the shank is approximately 68% to 76% of the nominal diameter; (b) a nominal diameter between 9/32 inch and ⅜ inch and the web thickness at the shank is approximately 61% to 65% of the nominal diameter; or (c) a nominal diameter 25/64 inch or larger and the web thickness at the shank is about 55% to 60% of the nominal diameter. A thickness of the web at the shank may be approximately 55% to 76% of the nominal diameter of the bit. The web taper rate may be approximately 0.070 to 0.074. The helix angle may be approximately 34.5°.


The working end and at least a portion of the flute portion may formed of a first metal section, and the shank is formed of a second metal section that is welded to the first metal section, the second metal section having a material toughness higher than the first metal section. A length to diameter ratio of the first metal section may be between approximately 0.7 and 3.0. The hardness of the first metal section may be at least approximately 65 HRc. The hardness of the second metal section may be approximately 45-55 HRc. At least one of the first and second metal sections may be heat treated so as to have a recognizable different appearance than the other of the first and second metal sections.


In another aspect, a set of drill bits includes a first drill bit having a first nominal diameter, a second drill bit having a second nominal diameter, and a third drill bit having a third nominal diameter. Each of the drill bits has a shank at a first end, a working end at a second end, and a flute portion between the shank and the working end. The shank, the flute portion and the working end are continuous with one another. The flute portion has flutes with a helix angle of approximately 30° to 35° and a tapered web. The first drill bit has a nominal diameter of 17/64 inch or less and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 13% to 15% of the nominal diameter. The second drill bit has a nominal diameter between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 11% to 13% of the nominal diameter. The third drill bit has a nominal diameter greater than or equal to 11/32 inch and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 9% to 10% of the nominal diameter.


Implementations of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. The first drill bit may have a web thickness at the shank of approximately 68% to 76% of the nominal diameter. The second drill bit may have a web thickness at the shank is approximately 61% to 65% of the nominal diameter. The third drill bit may have a web thickness at the shank is about 55% to 60% of the nominal diameter. Each of the webs may have a web taper rate of approximately 0.070 to 0.074. Each of the helix angles may be approximately 34.5°. Each of the working ends and at least a portion of each of the flute portions may be formed of a first metal section, and each of the shanks may be formed of a second metal section that is welded to the first metal section, where the first metal section may have a first material hardness that is higher than a second material hardness of the second metal section.


Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is an elevation view of a drill bit according to the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a working end of a drill bit of FIG. 1 from one side.



FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the drill bit of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 is an enlarged side elevation view of the tip of FIG. 1.



FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of the tip of FIG. 5 rotated 90°.



FIG. 7 is a cross-section view through the drill bit of FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of the taper of the bit.



FIGS. 9-11 are schematic charts showing box plots of drilled holes.



FIG. 12 is a side view of another embodiment of a drill bit.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following description of the drawings is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.


Referring to FIG. 1, a drill bit 20 is shown for cutting a variety of material such as metal, wood, plastics, plastics, piping and tubing. The drill bit 20 has a longitudinal axis X-X and may be manufactured from high-speed steel. The drill bit 20 has a shank end 22, a working end 24 and a fluted portion 26 interposed between the shank end 22 and the working end 24. The shank end 22 includes a substantially cylindrical shank 28 that extends from one end of the drill bit 20 to the fluted portion 26. The shank 28 connects to a tool holder (not shown) of a power tool. The shank 28 may have one or a plurality of axially parallel flat chamfers arranged equi-angularly around its circumference to improve the connection with a tool holder of a power tool.


The fluted portion 26 is formed with a pair of helical flutes 30 defined by a pair of helical lands 32 formed at a helix angle α measured with respect to the axis X-X. The helix angle α is between approximately 30° and 35°. In one embodiment, the helix angle may be approximately 34.5°. The helical flutes 30 and the helical lands 32 extend axially rearward from the working end 24 to the shank 28 and each have a pitch S. The pitch S is the linear distance on the drill bit between one full 360° revolution of a helical land. The pitch S is determined by the helix angle α and the major or nominal diameter D of a the fluted portion 26 of the drill bit 20, according to the formula: S=πD/(tan α). For example, in a ½ drill bit, the pitch S may be between approximately 1.87 and 3.36 inches, e.g., between approximately 1.87 and 2.24 inches. In a ½″ drill bit where the helix angle α is approximately 34.5°, the pitch is approximately 2.29 inches.


Referring to FIGS. 2 to 5, the working end 24 includes a flute cutting portion 34 having the same major or nominal diameter D, and a pilot tip 36 with a minor diameter d that is smaller than the major or nominal diameter D. The pilot tip 36 is formed integrally with and extends a short distance axially ahead of the flute cutting portion 34. The pilot tip 36 has a split point cutting edge arrangement at its extreme end 38. The cutting edge arrangement is formed with a pair of inner cutting edges 40, 42 separated by a slight chisel edge 38 extending between the inner cutting edges 40, 42. The chisel edge 38 is substantially perpendicular to the axis X-X. The split point is also formed with a pair of outer cutting edges 44, 46. Each outer cutting edge 44, 46 tapers radially outwardly from a respective inner cutting edge 40, 42 to the periphery of the minor diameter d of the pilot tip 36. The split point is also formed with a pair of primary clearance faces 48, 50. Each primary clearance face is formed behind a respective pair of leading inner and outer cutting edges 40, 44, 42, 46 (in the direction of rotation R) to provide relief behind these cutting edges. Each inner cutting edge 40, 42 forms a boundary between a leading rake face 52, 54 and a respective trailing primary clearance face 48, 50 (in the direction of rotation R).


The pilot tip 36 is also formed with a pair of rounded circumferential outer surfaces 56, 58. Each outer surface 56, 58 extend axially rearward on opposite sides of the pilot tip 36. The outer surface 56 is formed with a forward edge 60 and a trailing edge 62 (in the direction of rotation R). The outer surface 58 is formed with a forward edge 64 and a trailing edge 66 (in the direction of rotation R).


When viewed from above, as shown in FIG. 4, the outer surfaces 56, 58 are generally rounded but are also curved radially inwardly as the outer surfaces extend from a respective forward edge 60, 64 to a respective trailing edge 62, 66. This is clearly shown in FIG. 7, where the outer surfaces 56, 58 curve radially inwardly of a circle represented by dashed line 68 thereby creating a radial relief RR. Accordingly, the outer surfaces 56, 58 each provide relief behind a respective forward edge 60, 64.


When viewed from the side, as shown in FIG. 5, the outer surfaces 58, 60 are generally straight but are also slightly tapered radially inwardly as the outer surfaces extend axially rearward. The rearward taper RT of each outer surface 56, 58 are approximately 0.5° to 5° measured from a plane parallel to the axis X-X. Accordingly, the outer surfaces 56, 58 also provide relief behind the pilot tip 36.


Returning to FIGS. 2 to 5, the second cutting portion 34 is formed with a pair of second cutting edges 70, 72 at the terminus of the flute portion 26. Each second cutting edge 70, 72 has a respective trailing primary clearance face 74, 76 (in the direction of rotation R). Also, secondary clearance faces 75, 77 are continuous with the primary clearance faces 74, 76. The secondary clearance faces 75, 77 are angled with respect to the primary clearance faces 74, 76. The secondary clearance faces are on an angle from about 50° to about 65° with respect to the longitudinal axis. The secondary clearance faces 75, 77 are co-planar with the secondary clearance faces 49, 51 of the pilot point. Further, the secondary clearance faces 75, 77 are co-planar with the rake faces 41, 43 of the inner cutting edges 40, 42.


Each second cutting edge 70, 72 run radially inwardly in a substantially straight line from the periphery of the major diameter D towards the pilot tip 36. The second cutting edges 70, 72 are substantially on a plane which passes through the longitudinal axis X-X. In the region adjacent the pilot tip 36, the second cutting edge 70 begins to curve towards the working end 24 to form a radius at a forward edge 78 of a fillet 80. The second cutting edge 70 merges with the forward edge 60 of the outer surface 56 at the fillet 80. Likewise, the second cutting edge 72 extends from the periphery of the major diameter D towards the pilot tip 36 and eventually curves in an identical manner into a radius at a forward edge 82 of a fillet 84. The second cutting edge 72 merges with the forward edge 64 of the outer surface 58 at the fillet 84.


Each fillet 80, 84 begins at a respective forward edge 78, 82 with a relatively large radius and extends rearward in a curved path from the respective forward edge 78, 82, wherein the radius becomes progressively smaller until each fillet terminates in an approximately right-angle shaped corner 86, 88, respectively. In addition, each fillet 80, 84 extends radially inward from the respective forward edge 78, 82 to a respective trailing corner 86, 88 in the same manner as the rounded outer surfaces 56, 58. Accordingly, the fillets 80, 84 create relief behind the forward edges 78, 82.


As discussed above, relief is provided behind the edges mentioned above. For example, the primary clearance face 74, the secondary clearance face 75 the fillet 80, and the outer surface 56, which trail, the second cutting edge 70, the fillet forward edge 78 and the pilot tip forward edge 60, respectively, create relief behind these edges in the manner described above. Thus, when the drill bit 20 is used to drill a hole in a workpiece, these trailing surfaces do not engage and rub against the walls of the hole. Similarly, the primary clearance face 76, secondary clearance face 77, the fillet 84, and the outer surface 58, which trail, the second cutting edge 72, the fillet forward edge 82 and the pilot tip forward edge 64, respectively, also create relief behind these edges. Thus, when the drill bit 20 is used to drill a hole in a workpiece, these trailing surfaces do not engage and rub against the walls of the hole.


As is shown in FIG. 2, each helical land 32 has a helical margin 90 on a leading edge 91 (in the direction of rotation R) of its circumferential outer face. The margin 90 protrudes radially slightly beyond the circumferential outer face of a respective land 26 and is narrower than the circumferential outer face. The helix defined by each margin 90 defines the major diameter D. The margins 90 engage the walls of the hole to provide support to the drill bit 20 as it drills into a workpiece. Friction between the walls of the hole and the drill bit 20 is thus reduced because the margins 90 have a smaller surface area than the circumferential outer faces of the lands 26.


Referring to FIG. 6, a primary clearance angle CA of each primary clearance face 74, 76 is measured from a plane perpendicular to the axis X-X. The primary clearance angle CA falls within a range of about 8° to about 12° for those drill bits with a major diameter D of less than 8 mm. The primary clearance angle CA falls within a range of about 6° to about 12° for those drill bits with a major diameter D of greater than 8 mm.


Each helical land 32 has an inner surface 92 that defines the shape of a respective flute 34. Each land inner surface 92 extends axially rearward from a respective outer cutting edge 44, 46 and a respective second cutting edge 70, 72. Each outer cutting edge 44, 46 forms a boundary between a respective land inner surface 92 and a respective primary clearance face 48, 50. Likewise, each second cutting edge 70, 72 forms a boundary between a respective land inner surface 92 and a respective primary clearance face 74, 76. The land inner surfaces 92 act as a rake face to both the outer cutting edges 44, 46 and the second cutting edges 70, 72. Accordingly, the land inner surfaces 92 each effectively have a rake face angle RA, as measured from a plane parallel to the axis X-X, that is equal to the helix angle α. The cutting angle of the second cutting edges 70, 74 equals 90°−(RA+CA). The cutting angle of the outer cutting edges 44, 46 equals 90°−(RA+the relief angle of the primary relief face 48, 50).


Referring to FIG. 5, the split point cutting edge arrangement of the pilot tip 36 is formed with a point angle defined by inner cutting edges 40, 42. The pilot point angle PP falls within the range of 125° to 140°. The outer portion is formed with an outer point angle OP defined by the second cutting edges 70, 72 which falls within the range of about 120° to about 140° and preferably about 126° to about 136°. Accordingly, the second cutting edges are on an angle of about 22° to about 27° with respect to a line transverse to the X-X axis. The length L4 of the pilot tip 36 falls within the range of about 30% to about 45% of the major or nominal diameter D.


Referring to FIGS. 7 and 8, the drill bit 20 has a core, or web, 94 extending from the working end 24 to where the fluted section 26 joins the shank 28. The web 94 is defined by the helical lands 32. The web 94 is shown in dashed lines and tapers radially outwardly as it extends axially rearward from the working end 24. The web 94 has a thickness K at the pilot tip 36 and a thickness J near where the fluted section 26 joins the shank 28. The web 94 has a uniform web thickness taper rate along a length L2 between the pilot tip 36 and the point on the web 94 at which web thickness J is measured. The web thickness K is selected to provide suitably deep flutes 34 to convey, in use, debris and chips from the pilot tip 36 and out of the hole.


The following Table 1 provides examples of embodiments of bits that fall within the scope of the present disclosure:






















Diameter
L1
L2
L3
K
J
(J − K)
S

Web
Helix



















INCH
mm
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
J/D
K/D
Taper
Angle






















3/16
4.76
90
44
39
0.73
3.61
2.88
21.8
0.76
0.15
0.074
34.5


13/64
5.16
93
47
42
0.74
3.80
3.06
23.6
0.74
0.14
0.073
34.5


7/32
5.56
96
49
43
0.76
3.92
3.16
25.4
0.71
0.14
0.073
34.5


15/64
5.95
100
51
45
0.78
4.12
3.34
27.2
0.69
0.13
0.074
34.5


¼
6.35
103
55
49
0.80
4.31
3.51
29.0
0.68
0.13
0.072
34.5


17/64
6.75
106
59
52
0.82
4.56
3.74
30.9
0.68
0.12
0.072
34.5


9/32
7.14
109
60
53
0.84
4.62
3.78
32.6
0.65
0.12
0.071
34.5


19/64
7.54
113
62
54
0.86
4.81
3.95
34.5
0.64
0.11
0.073
34.5


5/16
7.94
116
66
58
0.87
5.06
4.19
36.3
0.64
0.11
0.072
34.5


21/64
8.33
119
69
61
0.90
5.26
4.36
38.1
0.63
0.11
0.072
34.5


11/32
8.73
123
72
63
0.91
5.45
4.54
39.9
0.62
0.10
0.072
34.5


23/64
9.13
126
73
64
0.94
5.64
4.70
41.7
0.62
0.10
0.074
34.5



9.53
129
78
68
0.95
5.83
4.88
43.6
0.61
0.10
0.072
34.5


25/64
9.92
132
80
70
0.97
5.92
4.95
45.3
0.60
0.10
0.071
34.5


13/32
10.3
136
83
72
0.99
6.18
5.19
47.2
0.60
0.10
0.072
34.5


27/64
10.7
139
86
75
1.01
6.35
5.34
49.0
0.59
0.09
0.071
34.5


7/16
11.1
142
89
78
1.02
6.52
5.50
50.8
0.59
0.09
0.070
34.5


29/64
11.5
145
93
81
1.05
6.75
5.70
52.6
0.59
0.09
0.070
34.5


15/32
11.9
149
95
83
1.06
6.97
5.91
54.4
0.59
0.09
0.071
34.5


31/64
12.3
152
97
85
1.08
7.09
6.01
56.2
0.58
0.09
0.071
34.5


½
12.7
155
100
87
1.10
7.29
6.19
58.1
0.57
0.09
0.071
34.5









The web thickness at the tip K is about 13% to 15% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter of ¼ inch of less. The web thickness K is about 11% to 13% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch. The web thickness K is about 9% to 10% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter greater than or equal to 11/32 inch. This is compared to 22% to 34% ( 3/64 inch- 5/32 inch), 14% to 20% ( 11/64 inch- 19/64 inch), 11% to 14% ( 5/16 inch-½ inch), respectively, of conventional drill bits with nominal diameter sizes. Thus, the web thickness K is about 60% less than the web thickness of conventional drill bits.


The web thickness at the shank (J) is about 68% to 76% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter of 17/64 inch or less. The web thickness at the shank J is about 61% to 65% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter between 9/32 inch and ⅜ inch. The web thickness at the shank J is about 55% to 60% of the nominal diameter for bits having a nominal diameter 25/64 inch or larger. The web taper rate ((J-K)/L3) for all nominal diameters is approximately 0.070 to 0.074. The helix angle for all nominal diameters is approximately 30° to 35°, in particular approximately 34.5°.


In an embodiment, the drill bits of the present disclosure may be bi-metal drill bits composed of two different metal materials, similar to the drill bits disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/205,577. Referring to FIG. 12, in this embodiment, the drill bit 100 has a cutting tip 101, a fluted portion 102 and a shank portion 104. The drill bit also has a first portion 106 (encompassing the cutting tip 101 and a front portion of the fluted portion 102) that is formed of a first metal, and a second portion 108 (encompassing a rear portion of the fluted portion and the entire shank portion 104) that is formed of a second metal. The first portion 106 is welded to the second portion 108. The first metal of the first portion 106 has a material hardness that is higher than a second metal of the second portion 108. In certain embodiments, one of the first and second metal portions 106, 108 may be treated either by coating or heat treating so as to have a recognizable different appearance than the other of the first and second metal sections 106, 108. This treatment allows a user to readily recognize that the drill bit is a bi-metal drill bit having improved cutting characteristics due to the hardened cutting portion 101 and front portion of the fluted portion 102, and improved durability due to the tougher metal of the rear portion of the fluted portion 102 and the shank portion 104.


For example, the first metal may be a high-speed steel, e.g., M42 (8% cobalt), M35 (5% cobalt), or M2, with an HRc hardness of at least approximately 65 HRc, for example an HRc in the high 60s. The second metal may be ordinary tool steel, such as 65 Mn steel, with an HRc hardness between approximately 45-55 HRc. The length to diameter ratio of the first metal portion 106 has been optimized to provide good cutting action for sheet-metal having a thickness of ¼ inch or less. For example, a length to diameter ratio of the first metal section is between approximately 0.7 and 3.0. The lengths of the first metal portion 106 and the second metal portion 108 have been optimized: (1) to allow the first metal section to be able to be held by a welding machine during welding; (2) to allow passage of sufficient current through the first metal section for good electrical resistance welding; (3) to provide better life of the drill bit; (4) to provide better bending toughness in the second metal portion after the first metal section breaks through the sheet-metal; and (5) to minimize the cost of the components of the drill bit.


The drill bits of the present disclosure dramatically and unexpecrtedly improve drilling life as compared to the prior art design for drill bits, while still preserving acceptable drilling speed. Referring to FIG. 9, in one test, a drill bit having a 6.35 mm nominal diameter (D), a web thickness at the tip (K) of 0.80 mm, a web thickness (J) at the shank of 4.31 mm, a helix length (S) of approximately 29 mm, and a K/D ratio of 0.09 was tested in an Orwin test rig, drilling holes in mild steel. This drill bit was compared against the current conventional drill bit sold by Applicant. The results of this test are illustrated in the box chart shown in FIG. 9. The chart illustrates the number of holes drilled by the present drill bit versus conventional drill bits in mild steel before failure. The present drill bit, on average, drilled approximately 50% more holes prior to failure.


Referring to FIG. 10, another drilling life test was performed using a plurality of the ¼″ drill bits having the dimensions set forth in the above Table 1. When a user drills a hole in a workpiece using a hand-held drill, as the drill bit becomes dull, the user will determine that the drill bit is worn out after it does not cut a hole in a reasonable amount of time. Accordingly, the drill bits were life tested using a test rig with a corded drill drilling holes in a ¼-inch thick piece of 1018 mild steel. Acceptable drill times to drill a hole are under approximately 90 seconds per hole. Above approximately 90 seconds, the user believes the drill bit is worn out. Accordingly, the drill bit is said to have reached the end of its life when the drill bit breaks or when the time for drilling the holes exceeds 90 seconds, whichever comes first. On average, the prior art drill bits drilled approximately 252 holes in less than 90 seconds per hole. On average, the drill bits of the present invention drilled approximately 461 holes in less than 90 seconds per hole. This represents an approximately 83% increase in drilling life.


Referring to FIG. 11, the same ¼-inch drill bits were also tested in a drilling speed test using the same test rig as the life test. The drilling speed is determined by the average time for the drill bit to drill each of the first five holes drilled. This test shows that the exemplary drill bits of the present disclosure achieve a speed of approximately 13 seconds, which is virtually the same as the prior art drill bit speed of approximately 14 seconds. Thus, the speed of the drill bits was within the acceptable range of speeds.


It is believed that this dramatic increase in life while maintaining the drilling speed is due to the smaller web thickness (K) at the tip, the smaller helix angle, and the more dramatic web taper rate to a sufficiently large web thickness (J) at the shank, along with the larger helix angle (e.g., approximately 34.5°. In certain embodiments, the bi-metal construction of the bit may further contribute to the improved life.


The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An elongated drill bit with a longitudinal axis comprising: a shank at a first end having a nominal diameter that is between 13/64 inch and ¼ inch, between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch, or between 11/32 inch and ½ inch;a working end at a second end;a flute portion between the shank and the working end, with the shank, the working end and the flute portion continuous with one another, the flute portion including at least one flute at a helix angle of approximately 30° to 35°,the working end comprises a pilot tip with a first cutting portion and a second cutting portion axially spaced from the first cutting portion, at a terminus of the flute portion, and including a pair of cutting edges on opposing sides of the pilot tip; anda tapered web formed in the flute portion, where a thickness of the web at the tip of the working end is between 13% and 14% of the nominal diameter if the nominal diameter is between 13/64 inch and ¼ inch, is between 11% and 12% of the nominal diameter if the nominal diameter is between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch, or is between 9% and 10% of the nominal diameter if the nominal diameter is between 11/32 inch and ½ inch.
  • 2. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the web at the shank is approximately 55% to 76% of the nominal diameter.
  • 3. The drill bit of claim 2, wherein the drill bit has a nominal diameter of 17/64 inch or less and the web thickness at the shank is approximately 68% to 76% of the nominal diameter.
  • 4. The drill bit of claim 2, wherein the drill bit has a nominal diameter between 9/32 inch and ⅜ inch and the web thickness at the shank is approximately 61% to 65% of the nominal diameter.
  • 5. The drill bit of claim 2, wherein the drill bit has a nominal diameter 25/64 inch or larger and the web thickness at the shank is about 55% to 60% of the nominal diameter.
  • 6. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein the web taper rate is approximately 0.070 to 0.074.
  • 7. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein the helix angle is approximately 34.5°.
  • 8. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein the working end and at least a portion of the flute portion is formed of a first metal section, and the shank is formed of a second metal section that is welded to the first metal section, the second metal section having a hardness that is lower than a hardness of the first metal section.
  • 9. The drill bit of claim 8, wherein a length to diameter ratio of the first metal section is between approximately 0.7 and 3.0.
  • 10. The drill bit of claim 8, wherein the hardness of the first metal section is at least approximately 65 HRc.
  • 11. The drill bit of claim 10, wherein the hardness of the second metal section is approximately 45-55 HRc.
  • 12. The drill bit of claim 8, wherein at least one of the first and second metal sections is heat treated so as to have a recognizable different appearance than the other of the first and second metal sections.
  • 13. A set of drill bits comprising: a first drill bit having a first nominal diameter, a second drill bit having a second nominal diameter, and a third drill bit having a third nominal diameter, each of the drill bits having a shank at a first end, a working end at a second end, and a flute portion between the shank and working end, where the shank, the flute portion, and the working end are continuous with one another, and the flute portion has at least one flute with a helix angle of approximately 30° to 35° and a tapered web,wherein the first drill bit has a nominal diameter of 13/64 inch to ¼ inch and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 13% to 14% of the nominal diameter,wherein the second drill bit has a nominal diameter between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 11% to 12% of the nominal diameter, andwherein the third drill bit has a nominal diameter greater than or equal to 11/32 inch and a thickness of the web at the working end of approximately 9% to 10% of the nominal diameter.
  • 14. The set of drill bits of claim 13, wherein the first drill bit has a web thickness at the shank of approximately 68% to 76% of the nominal diameter, the second drill bit has a web thickness at the shank is approximately 61% to 65% of the nominal diameter, and the third drill bit has a web thickness at the shank is about 55% to 60% of the nominal diameter.
  • 15. The set of drill bits of claim 13, wherein the web of each drill bit has a web taper rate of approximately 0.070 to 0.074.
  • 16. The set of drill bits of claim 13, wherein the helix angle of each drill bit is approximately 34.5°.
  • 17. The set of drill bits of claim 13, wherein at least one of the drill bits has the working end and at least a portion of the flute portion formed of a first metal section, and has the shank formed of a second metal section that is welded to the first metal section, the first metal section having a first material hardness that is higher than a second material hardness of the second metal section.
  • 18. An elongated drill bit with a longitudinal axis comprising: a shank at a first end having a nominal diameter that is between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch or that is 11/32 inch or greater;a working end having a cutting portion at a second end;a flute portion between the shank and the working end, with the shank, the working end and the flute portion continuous with one another, the flute portion including at least one flute at a helix angle of approximately 30° to 35°; anda tapered web formed in the flute portion, where a thickness of the web at the working end is between 11% and 12% of the nominal diameter if the nominal diameter is between 17/64 inch and 21/64 inch, or is between 9% and 10% of the nominal diameter if the nominal diameter is 11/32 inch or greater,wherein the working end and at least a portion of the flute portion is formed of a first metal section, and the shank is formed of a second metal section that is resistance welded to the first metal section, the second metal section having a second hardness that is lower than a first hardness of the first metal section.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/871,446, filed on Aug. 29, 2013, titled “Self-Centering Drill Bit.” This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/205,577, filed Mar. 12, 2014, titled “Bi-Metal Drill Bit,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/860,987, filed on Aug. 1, 2013, and is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/449,538, filed on Mar. 15, 2013 and a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. Design Pat. Application No. 29/468,347, filed on Sep. 30, 2013. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference

US Referenced Citations (147)
Number Name Date Kind
460639 Holt Oct 1891 A
542223 Johnson Jul 1895 A
1350241 Routh Aug 1920 A
1398156 Schroeder Nov 1921 A
1499584 Litchfield Jul 1924 A
1570650 Thomson Jan 1926 A
1887372 Emmons Nov 1931 A
RE18182 Emmons May 1934 E
D92385 Bardwell Jun 1934 S
1984839 Murray Dec 1934 A
2101347 Robinette Dec 1937 A
2193186 Bannister Mar 1940 A
2302069 Stephens Nov 1942 A
2332295 Bouchal Oct 1943 A
D137744 Gunderson Apr 1944 S
2652083 Emmons Sep 1953 A
2708853 MacLean May 1955 A
2740974 Lewis Apr 1956 A
2769355 Crisp Nov 1956 A
2936658 Riley May 1960 A
3027953 Coski Apr 1962 A
3085453 Mossberg Apr 1963 A
3387511 Ackart, Sr. et al. Jun 1968 A
3476438 Bower, Jr. Nov 1969 A
3559513 Hougen Feb 1971 A
3592555 Mackey, Sr. Jul 1971 A
3609056 Hougen Sep 1971 A
3648508 Hougen Mar 1972 A
3655244 Swisher Apr 1972 A
3746396 Radd Jul 1973 A
3779664 Caley et al. Dec 1973 A
3825362 Hougen Jul 1974 A
4144868 Heitbrink Mar 1979 A
4210215 Peetz et al. Jul 1980 A
D257511 Zahn Nov 1980 S
4265574 Eckle May 1981 A
4340327 Martins Jul 1982 A
4383784 Gulbrandsen May 1983 A
D269495 Finn Jun 1983 S
4529341 Greene Jul 1985 A
4556347 Barish Dec 1985 A
4605347 Jodock et al. Aug 1986 A
4711609 Seefluth Dec 1987 A
4756650 Wakihira et al. Jul 1988 A
4762445 Bunting et al. Aug 1988 A
4826368 Tikal et al. May 1989 A
4878788 Wakihira et al. Nov 1989 A
4880707 Kohno et al. Nov 1989 A
4898503 Barish Feb 1990 A
4926558 Brace May 1990 A
4967855 Moser Nov 1990 A
4968193 Chaconas et al. Nov 1990 A
4983079 Imanaga et al. Jan 1991 A
5011342 Hsu Apr 1991 A
5056967 Hageman Oct 1991 A
5088863 Imanaga et al. Feb 1992 A
5152642 Pitts et al. Oct 1992 A
5230593 Imanaga et al. Jul 1993 A
5288183 Chaconas et al. Feb 1994 A
D346103 Warner Apr 1994 S
5350261 Takaya et al. Sep 1994 A
5442979 Hsu Aug 1995 A
5580196 Thompson et al. Dec 1996 A
5934845 Frey Aug 1999 A
5947660 Karlsson et al. Sep 1999 A
6007279 Malone, Jr. Dec 1999 A
D419575 Kouvells Jan 2000 S
6045302 Orr Apr 2000 A
6050754 Thomas Apr 2000 A
6089337 Kleine et al. Jul 2000 A
6102634 Turner et al. Aug 2000 A
6113321 Mulroy et al. Sep 2000 A
6190097 Thomas Feb 2001 B1
6227774 Haughton et al. May 2001 B1
6309149 Borschert et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312432 Leppelmeier Nov 2001 B1
6443674 Jaconi Sep 2002 B1
6511268 Vasudeva et al. Jan 2003 B1
6637987 Lui et al. Oct 2003 B2
D482252 Hyde Nov 2003 S
6652203 Risen, Jr. Nov 2003 B1
6705807 Rudolph et al. Mar 2004 B1
6739872 Turri May 2004 B1
6851898 Ege et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857832 Nygard Feb 2005 B2
6981496 Szendrovari et al. Jan 2006 B2
D525840 Bruce Aug 2006 S
7178878 Rompel Feb 2007 B2
7241085 Frisendahl Jul 2007 B2
7258513 Gertner Aug 2007 B2
7267514 Wetzl et al. Sep 2007 B2
7363922 Lang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7398840 Ladi et al. Jul 2008 B2
7520703 Rompel Apr 2009 B2
D594306 Decker Jun 2009 S
7578726 Gasser Aug 2009 B2
7784381 Ladi et al. Aug 2010 B2
7784567 Choe et al. Aug 2010 B2
7802495 Oxford et al. Sep 2010 B2
7851067 Caliskanoglu et al. Dec 2010 B2
7900719 Yao Mar 2011 B2
7913779 Choe et al. Mar 2011 B2
D637629 Clark May 2011 S
D648356 Clark Nov 2011 S
8168009 Mesquita et al. May 2012 B2
8201648 Choe et al. Jun 2012 B2
D664167 Lampe Jul 2012 S
8230762 Choe et al. Jul 2012 B2
8449041 Monyak et al. May 2013 B2
D687871 Liao et al. Aug 2013 S
8740515 Thomas et al. Jun 2014 B2
20020046885 Eichhorn Apr 2002 A1
20020160235 Caminiti Oct 2002 A1
20030017015 Strubler Jan 2003 A1
20030202853 Ko et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215297 Frisendahl Nov 2003 A1
20040052595 Dembicks et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040191015 Kozak Sep 2004 A1
20040253379 Sugita et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050053438 Wetzl et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050098358 Nadler May 2005 A1
20050126829 Meierhofer et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050271890 Koecher Dec 2005 A1
20060056930 Rompel Mar 2006 A1
20070062046 Hsu Mar 2007 A1
20080056835 Astrand et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080166194 Durfee Jul 2008 A1
20080189957 Kasper Aug 2008 A1
20090133785 Ayada et al. May 2009 A1
20090283334 Durairajan et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090320299 Kuhn et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003094 Durfee Jan 2010 A1
20100054881 Thomas Mar 2010 A1
20100135741 Probst et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100183391 Kersten Jul 2010 A1
20100192475 Stevens et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100193255 Stevens et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232898 Friedrichs Sep 2010 A1
20100276205 Oxford et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110142707 Choe et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168453 Kersten et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110186261 Choe et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120003057 Leyba Jan 2012 A1
20120301238 Quinn et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130209183 Chuo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140126972 Santamarina et al. May 2014 A1
20140219737 Takai et al. Aug 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
675842 Nov 1990 CH
1018422202 Sep 2010 CN
216607 Nov 1908 DE
7335696 Oct 1973 DE
2358048 May 1975 DE
2629130 Jan 1978 DE
2946103 May 1981 DE
8536123 Apr 1987 DE
3927615 Feb 1991 DE
4117486 Dec 1992 DE
19807609 Jun 1999 DE
20005730 Oct 2000 DE
20203232 May 2002 DE
10130681 Jan 2003 DE
20209797 Nov 2003 DE
20211589 Jan 2004 DE
102006049096 Apr 2008 DE
249104 Dec 1987 EP
455420 Nov 1991 EP
522202 Mar 1995 EP
1238732 Sep 2002 EP
1260296 Nov 2002 EP
1016480 Sep 2004 EP
2058073 May 2009 EP
2829715 Mar 2003 FR
699716 Nov 1953 GB
1360221 Jul 1974 GB
2193913 Feb 1988 GB
61226209 Oct 1986 JP
62188614 Aug 1987 JP
1140908 Jun 1989 JP
4244311 Sep 1992 JP
9225720 Sep 1997 JP
2001105216 Apr 2001 JP
2003225819 Aug 2003 JP
3184707 Jul 2013 JP
844160 Jul 1981 SU
1238905 Jun 1986 SU
2004037472 May 2004 WO
2004011179 Feb 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
“High Speed Steels (HSS) Hardness Tables” http://www.tool-tool.com/hss.htm.
Twist Drills Standard (ASME B94:11-M-1993)—The American Society of Mechanical Engineers—pp. 1-3, 7-33, 48-49, 56-59—Mar. 31, 1994.
National Aerospace Standard (NAS-907)—Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc.—pp. 1-25—1986.
Black & Decker 1983-84 Consumer Trade Catalog—p. 28—1983.
Introduction to Mechanics of Solids—POPOV, Egor P.—“Design of Nonprismatic Beams”—pp. 360-362—1968.
Rilliard, Arnaud—European Search Report re: European Patent Application No. 14182342—Jan. 28, 2015—10 pages—The Hague.
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China—Office Action re: related Patent Application No. 201510109942.8—Dec. 16, 2015—10 pages.
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China—Machine Translation of Office Action re: related Patent Application No. 201510109942.8—Dec. 16, 2015—10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140356088 A1 Dec 2014 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61871446 Aug 2013 US
61860987 Aug 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14205577 Mar 2014 US
Child 14462935 US
Parent 29449538 Mar 2013 US
Child 14205577 US
Parent 29468347 Sep 2013 US
Child 29449538 US