Drill bits and tools for subterranean drilling, methods of manufacturing such drill bits and tools and methods of directional and off center drilling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9309723
  • Patent Number
    9,309,723
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 5, 2010
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 12, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A drill bit may include a bit body including at least one blade extending at least partially over a cone region of the bit body. Additionally, the drill bit may include a plurality of cutting structures mounted to the at least one blade and a rubbing zone within the cone region of the at least one blade, wherein cutting structures within the rubbing zone have a reduced average exposure. Additionally, a method of directional drilling may include positioning a depth-of-cut controlling feature of a drill bit away from a formation to prevent substantial contact between the depth-of-cut controlling feature and rotating the drill bit off-center to form a substantially straight borehole segment. The method may also include positioning the depth-of-cut controlling feature of the drill bit into contact with the formation to control the depth-of-cut and rotating the drill bit on-center to form a substantially nonlinear borehole segment.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the invention relate to drill bits and tools for subterranean drilling and, more particularly, embodiments relate to drill bits incorporating structures for enhancing contact and rubbing area control and improved directional and off-center drilling.


BACKGROUND

Boreholes are formed in subterranean formations for various purposes including, for example, extraction of oil and gas from subterranean formations and extraction of geothermal heat from subterranean formations. Boreholes may be foamed in subterranean formations using earth-boring tools such as, for example, drill bits.


To drill a borehole with a drill bit, the drill bit is rotated and advanced into the subterranean formation under an applied axial force, commonly known as “weight on bit,” or WOB. As the drill bit rotates, the cutters or abrasive structures thereof cut, crush, shear, and/or abrade away the formation material to form the borehole, depending on the type of bit and the formation to be drilled. A diameter of the borehole drilled by the drill bit may be defined by the cutting structures disposed at the largest outer diameter of the drill bit.


The drill bit is coupled, either directly or indirectly, to an end of what is referred to in the art as a “drill string,” which comprises a series of elongated tubular segments connected end-to-end that extends into the borehole from the surface of the formation. Often various subs and other components, such as a downhole motor, a steering sub or other assembly, a measuring while drilling (MWD) assembly, one or more stabilizers, or a combination of some or all of the foregoing, as well as the drill bit, may be coupled together at the distal end of the drill string at the bottom of the borehole being drilled. This assembly of components is referred to in the art as a “bottom hole assembly” (BHA).


The drill bit may be rotated within the borehole by rotating the drill string from the surface of the formation, or the drill bit may be rotated by coupling the drill bit to a down-hole motor, which is also coupled to the drill string and disposed proximate to the bottom of the borehole. The downhole motor may comprise, for example, a hydraulic Moineau-type motor having a shaft, to which the drill bit is mounted, that may be caused to rotate by pumping fluid (e.g., drilling fluid or “mud”) from the surface of the formation down through the center of the drill string, through the hydraulic motor, out from nozzles in the drill bit, and back up to the surface of the formation through an annulus between the outer surface of the drill string and the exposed surface of the formation within the borehole. As noted above, when a borehole is being drilled in a formation, axial force or “weight” is applied to the drill bit (and reamer device, if used) to cause the drill bit to advance into the formation as the drill bit drills the borehole therein.


It is known in the art to employ what are referred to as “depth-of-cut control” (DOCC) features on earth-boring drill bits which are configured as fixed-cutter, or so-called “drag” bits, wherein polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutting elements, or cutters, are used to shear formation material. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,930 to Sinor et al., issued Oct. 9, 2001, discloses rotary drag bits that including exterior features to control the depth of cut by PDC cutters mounted thereon, so as to control the volume of formation material cut per bit rotation as well as the reactive torque experienced by the bit and an associated bottom-hole assembly. The exterior features may provide sufficient bearing area so as to support the drill bit against the bottom of the borehole under weight-on-bit without exceeding the compressive strength of the formation rock. However, such depth-of-cut control features may not be well suited for drilling all borehole segments during directional drilling applications. For example, when drilling in slide mode (i.e., on-center drilling and directional drilling) to form a non-linear borehole segment, it may be desirable to maintain a relatively small depth of cut to improve steerability; however, conventional depth-of-cut control features may hinder efficient drilling in rotate mode (i.e., off-center drilling and vertical drilling) wherein a higher rate of penetration (ROP) is desirable.


In view of the foregoing, improved drill bits for directional drilling applications, improved methods of manufacturing such bits and improved methods of directional and off-center drilling applications would be desirable.


BRIEF SUMMARY

In some embodiments, a drill bit for subterranean drilling may have a cutter profile comprising a concavity radially extending greater than a width of any single cutter defining the cutter profile.


In further embodiments, a drill bit for subterranean drilling may include a bit body including a plurality of blades, and at least one blade of the plurality of blades may extend at least partially over a cone region of the bit body. Additionally, the drill bit may include a plurality of cutting structures mounted to the at least one blade extending at least partially over the cone region, and the drill bit may include a rubbing zone within the cone region of the at least one blade, wherein cutting structures have a reduced average exposure.


In additional embodiments, a method of directional drilling may include positioning a depth-of-cut controlling feature of a drill bit to prevent more than incidental contact between the depth-of-cut controlling feature and the formation being drilled while rotating the drill bit off-center to form a substantially straight borehole segment. The method may also include positioning the depth-of-cut controlling feature of the drill bit for effective rubbing contact with the formation to control the depth-of-cut while rotating the drill bit on-center to form a nonlinear, such as a substantially arcuate, borehole segment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the face of a drill bit according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a cutter profile of the drill bit of FIG. 1, having a concavity in a cone region.



FIG. 3 shows a cutter profile of another bit, having a blade protrusion in a cone region, according to another embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows a drill bit according to an embodiment of the present invention attached to a drill string in operated in slide mode.



FIG. 5 shows the drill bit and drill string of FIG. 4 operated in rotate mode.



FIG. 6 shows a predicted rubbing area superimposed on the face of the drill bit of FIG. 1 at a depth-of-cut of about zero inches per revolution in slide mode.



FIG. 7 shows a predicted rubbing area superimposed on the face of the drill bit of FIG. 1 at a depth-of-cut of about 0.1 inch per revolution in slide mode.



FIG. 8 shows a predicted rubbing area superimposed on the face of the drill bit of FIG. 1 at a depth-of-cut of about 0.2 inch per revolution in slide mode.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Illustrations presented herein are not meant to be actual views of any particular drill bit or other earth-boring tool, but are merely idealized representations which are employed to describe the present invention. Additionally, elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation.


The various drawings depict embodiments of the invention as will be understood by the use of ordinary skill in the art and are not necessarily drawn to scale.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 1, a drill bit 10 may have a bit body 12 that includes a plurality of blades 14 thereon. Each blade 14 may be separated by fluid courses 18, which may include fluid nozzles 20 positioned therein. Each blade 14 may include a blade face 22 with cutting structures mounted thereto. For example, each blade 14 may include a plurality of PDC cutters 24 positioned within cutter pockets formed in the blade 14 along a rotationally leading edge thereof. A portion of each cutter 24 may extend out of its respective cutter pocket beyond the blade face 22. The extent to which each cutter 24 extends beyond the blade face 22 defines the exposure of each cutter 24. For example, one or more cutters 24 may be mounted relatively deeper within a pocket, such that the cutter 24 exhibits a reduced exposure. As another example, one or more cutters 24 may be mounted relatively shallower within a cutter pocket, such that the cutter 24 exhibits an increased exposure. As a practical matter, such relatively deeper or shallower exposure may be achieved by forming the cutter pockets to hold the cutters 24 at desired depths to achieve desired exposures in the blade leading end face during manufacture of the drill bit 10.


The blades 14 and cutters 24 may define a face of the bit 10 that may include a cone region 26, a nose region 28, a shoulder region 30 and a gage region 32 (FIG. 2). The cone region 26 may be generally shaped as an inverted cone and is generally located at a central axis 34 of the drill bit 10 and centrally located on the face of the drill bit 10. At least one blade 36, 38 may extend at least partially over the cone region 26 of the face of the drill bit 10 and include a rubbing zone 39, which may be utilized as a depth-of-cut controlling feature, in the cone region 26 of the blade 36, 38 wherein cutters 40, 42 within the rubbing zone 39 have a reduced average exposure.


In some embodiments, such as shown in FIG. 2, a cutter profile 44 defined by the plurality of cutters 24 includes a concavity 48 within the rubbing zone 39, which may, in combination with the use of more deeply inset cutters 24 of the same diameter as shown, result in a reduced average exposure of the cutters 40, 42 within the rubbing zone 39. In additional embodiments, such as shown in FIG. 3, one or more blades 36, 38 may include a protrusion 50 within the rubbing zone 39, which may also, in combination with cutters 40,42 set at a reduced average height when compared to flanking cutters 24, result in a reduced average exposure of the cutters 40, 42 within the rubbing zone 39. In further embodiments, one or more blades 36, 38 may include a protrusion 50 within the rubbing zone 39, which may also, in combination with cutters 40, 42 set to the same depth as radially flanking cutters 24 of the same diameter, result in a reduced average exposure of the cutters 40, 42 within the rubbing zone 39. In yet additional embodiments, one or more blades 36, 38 may include an optional rubbing insert 52 positioned within the rubbing zone 39, as indicated in FIG. 1.



FIG. 2 illustrates what is known in the art as a cutter profile 44 of the drill bit 10, and shows a cross-section of the blade 36. Each of the overlapping circles shown in FIG. 2 represents the position that would be occupied on the blade 36 by the cutting face of a cutter 24 if each of the cutters 24 were rotated circumferentially about the central longitudinal axis 34 of the drill bit 10 to a position on the blade 36. As seen in FIG. 2, cutting edges of the cutters 24 may define a cutter profile 44, which is approximately represented. In such embodiments, where the cutter profile 44 has a concavity 48 within the cone region 26, as shown in FIG. 2, the rubbing zone 39 may be located on the blade 36 rotationally following the cutters 40, 42 having a reduced exposure and forming the concavity 48 of the cutter profile 44. As shown, the concavity 48 may be defined by more than one cutter 24, for example the concavity 48 may be defined by two cutters 40, 42, and may radially extend, relative to the central longitudinal axis 34 of the drill bit 10, greater than the width of any single cutter 24 defining the cutter profile 44. While the cutter profile 44 may exhibit a concavity 48, the blade surface 22 of the blade 36 may not exhibit a concavity, and the cutters 40, 42 defining the concavity 48 in the cutter profile 44 may have a reduced average exposure relative to other cutters 24 within the cone region 26 of the bit face and may have a reduced average exposure relative to cutters in the nose region 28 and the shoulder region 30. In such an embodiment, the rubbing zone 39 may extend over regions of the cutter faces 22 that rotationally trail the concavity 48 in the cutter profile 44 and the regions of the cutter faces 22 within the rubbing zone 39 may provide a depth-of-cut controlling feature.


In additional embodiments, as shown in FIG. 3, the cutter profile 44 of a drill bit 10 may not include a concavity 48 and one or more blades 36, 38 may include a protrusion 50 in the cone region 26. As one or more blades 36, 38 may include a protrusion 50, and the cutter profile 44 may not exhibit a protrusion, the cutters 40, 42 rotationally preceding the protrusion 50 may have a reduced average exposure relative to other cutters 24 within the cone region 26 of the bit body 10 and may have a reduced average exposure relative to cutters 24 in the nose region 28 and the shoulder region 30. In such an embodiment, the rubbing zone 39 may extend over the protrusions 50 of the cutter faces 22 of the blades 36, 38 and the protrusions 50 of the cutter faces 22 may provide a depth-of-cut controlling feature.


In some embodiments, the drill bit 10 may include one or more rubbing inserts 52, as shown in FIG. 1, which may be located within the rubbing zone 39 within the cone region 26 of the drill bit 10. The rubbing inserts 52 may comprise an abrasion resistant material and may be positioned on and coupled to one or more blades 36, 38. For example, the rubbing inserts 52 may be formed of tungsten carbide and may be brazed into pockets formed in the blade faces 22 of the blades 36, 38. In some embodiments, the rubbing inserts 52 may be configured and positioned within the blades 36, 38 to protrude from the blade faces 22 and may define protrusions, such as protrusion 50 (FIG. 3), from the blade faces 22. In additional embodiments, the rubbing inserts 52 may be configured and positioned within the blades 36, 38 and a surface of the rubbing inserts 52 may substantially align with the blade faces 22 and may be positioned within a rubbing zone 39 rotationally trailing a concavity 48 in the cutter profile 44, each rubbing insert 52 positioned rotationally trailing a cutting insert 40, 42 having a reduced exposure, such as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Rubbing inserts 52 may provide several advantages, for example, rubbing inserts 52 may extend the useful life of the drill bit 10 and prevent excessive wearing of the blade faces 22. For another example, the rubbing inserts 52 may be removed and replaced, to extend the useful life of the drill bit 10 and to provide a more flexible design for the drill bit 10, as the height of the rubbing insert 52 may be changed, and thus the rubbing contact of the rubbing insert 52 may be changed as desired and the exposure of the rotationally preceding cutters 24 may also be changed. In embodiments having rubbing inserts 52, the rubbing zone 39 may extend over the rubbing inserts 52 and the rubbing inserts 52 may provide a depth-of-cut controlling feature.


As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the drill bit 10 may also include a shank 60 attached to a bit body 62 and the shank 60 may be attached to a drill string 64. For directional drilling applications, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the drill bit 10 may be coupled to a downhole motor 66, which may be positioned beneath a bent sub 68. The drill string 64 may be coupled to a drilling rig (not shown) located at the top of the borehole 70, 72 which may rotate the drill string 64 and may direct fluid (i.e., drilling mud) through the drill string 64. In view of this, the entire drill string 64 may be rotated (i.e., rotate mode) and the drill bit 10 may be rotated along an axis of rotation 73 that is different than the central longitudinal axis 34 of the drill bit 10, or “off-center,” and may form a substantially straight borehole segment 70, as shown in FIG. 5. Alternatively, the bent sub 68 and the drill string 64 above the bent sub 68 may not be rotated and the drill bit 10 may be rotated by the downhole motor 66 alone, substantially along its central longitudinal axis 34, or “on-center,” below the bent sub 68. As the drill bit 10 is rotated on-center, the drill bit 10 may drill a generally arcuate or other nonlinear borehole segment 72 (i.e., slide mode), as shown in FIG. 4, in a direction generally following that of the bend in the bent sub 68.


In slide mode operations, as shown in FIG. 4, a depth-of-cut controlling feature within the rubbing zone 39 in the cone region of the drill bit 10 may be positioned into effective rubbing contact with a formation 74. As used herein, the term “effective rubbing contact” means contact, which may be substantially constant or may be intermittent, that is effective to limit a depth-of-cut of cutters proximate to the rubbing zone while drilling. As the bit is rotated, the depth-of-cut controlling feature, such as the region of the blades 36, 38 rotationally trailing the cutters 40, 42 having the reduced average exposure, may effectively rub against the formation 74 and may inhibit excessive penetration of the cutting structures 24 cutting into the formation 74. In other words, as the weight on bit increases, the rate of penetration of the drill bit 10 may be controlled and remain substantially the same or be predictably and controllably increased, when compared to a drill bit 10 without a depth-of-cut controlling feature. By controlling the depth-of-cut, more specifically by providing a substantially consistent depth-of-cut, a more consistent and accurate nonlinear borehole segment 72 may be formed during a slide mode operation and the path of the borehole segment 72 may be more accurately predicted and controlled.



FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 show the predicted rubbing area 76 for the drill bit 10 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 at different depths-of-cut during slide mode operation. FIG. 6 shows a predicted rubbing area 76 for a depth-of-cut of about zero (0) inches per revolution; as shown, it is predicted that about 10% of the rubbing zone 39 will contact the formation 74 (FIGS. 4 and 5). FIG. 7 shows a predicted rubbing area 76 for a depth-of-cut of about 0.1 inch per revolution; as shown, it is predicted that about 25% of the rubbing zone 39 will contact the formation 74 (FIGS. 4 and 5). FIG. 8 shows a predicted rubbing area 76 for a depth-of-cut of about 0.2 inch per revolution; as shown, it is predicted that about 50% of the rubbing zone 39 will contact the formation 74 (FIGS. 4 and 5). As shown in FIGS. 6, 7 and 8, the rubbing between the formation 74 (FIGS. 4 and 5) and the drill bit 10 during slide mode operation may be substantially limited to the rubbing zone 39 and the depth-of-cut control feature within the cone region 26 (FIGS. 2 and 3) of the drill bit 10. These rubbing area percentages are provided as non-limiting examples. Rubbing area percentages will vary based on several bit design factors, including: the size of the bit, the number of blades the rubbing zone is applied to, the cutter density, and the geometry of the concavity.


In rotate mode operations, as shown in FIG. 5, it may not be desirable to utilize the depth-of-cut controlling feature. When the drill bit 10 is rotated off-center to form a substantially straight borehole segment 70 is formed it may be more efficient to have an increased depth-of-cut and a reduced rubbing, as a reliable substantially straight borehole segment 70 may be maintained at a higher depth-of-cut and reduced rubbing may result in a more efficient drilling of the substantially straight borehole segment 70. As the rubbing zone 39 and depth-of-cut control feature may be positioned within the cone region 26 of the drill bit 10, the depth-of-cut controlling feature may be located away from the formation 74 by slight cavitation of the drill bit 10 due to the presence of the bent sub 68, which may prevent more than incidental contact between the depth-of-cut controlling feature and the formation 74 during rotate mode operations, as shown in FIG. 5, resulting in a deeper depth of cut and higher ROP. Any incidental contact may be intermittent and may not result in substantial forces between the formation 74 and the depth-of-cut controlling feature, unlike rubbing contact.


In additional embodiments, a cone angle, which may be defined by an angle between the blade face 22 in the cone region 26 and the central longitudinal axis 34 of the drill bit 10, may also be adjusted in combination with providing a depth-of-cut control feature in the cone region 26 to provide the desired removal of contact of the depth-of-cut control feature with the formation during substantially straight drilling with a directional drilling BHA. For example, a cone angle may be chosen, in combination with the placement and of the depth-of-cut control feature, which effectively enables the depth-of-cut feature within the cone region 26 to be removed from contact with the formation 74 during off-center drilling operations (i.e., rotate mode operations) for drilling a substantially straight borehole segment.


In view of the foregoing, drill bits 10 as described herein may be utilized to reduce detrimental rubbing during off-center drilling operations, such as shown in FIG. 5, while providing desirable depth-of-cut control during on-center drilling operations.


Although this invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the invention is not limited to these described embodiments. Rather, the invention is limited only by the appended claims, which include within their scope all equivalent devices and methods according to principles of the invention as described.

Claims
  • 1. A drill bit for subterranean drilling comprising: a bit body including a plurality of blades, at least one blade of the plurality of blades extending at least partially over a cone region of the bit body;a plurality of cutting structures mounted to the at least one blade;a rubbing zone on the surface of the at least one blade within the cone region of the at least one blade, the rubbing zone positioned and configured to effectively rub against a formation being drilled and provide depth-of-cut control, and wherein cutting structures of the plurality of cutting structures substantially within the rubbing zone have a reduced average exposure relative to other cutting structures of the plurality of cutting structures within the cone region, wherein the bit body and the plurality of cutting structures are configured such that a cutter profile of the drill bit extends from a gage region of the at least one blade of the drill bit to a center axis of the drill bit and includes a concavity within the rubbing zone of the at least one blade radially extending greater than a width of any single cutting structure; anda protrusion within the rubbing zone, the protrusion separate and distinct from the plurality of cutting structures defining the cutter profile and radially extending greater than a width of at least two cutting structures of the plurality of cutting structures defining the cutter profile.
  • 2. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein all the cutting structures are configured to simultaneously engage the formation being drilled.
  • 3. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein the protrusion comprises an insert mounted on the at least one blade.
  • 4. The drill bit of claim 3, wherein the insert comprises a carbide insert.
  • 5. The drill bit of claim 3, wherein the insert mounted to the at least one blade rotationally trails the concavity of the cutter profile, the insert shaped and sized to reduce an average exposure of cutting structures of the plurality of cutting structures rotationally preceding that insert relative to other cutting structures within the cone region.
  • 6. The drill bit of claim 1, wherein the rubbing zone is positioned and configured to effectively rub against the formation being drilled and provide depth-of-cut control only when the drill bit is rotated on-center.
  • 7. The drill bit of claim 6, wherein the rubbing zone is further positioned and configured to be positioned substantially away from more than incidental contact with the formation being drilled when the drill bit is rotated off-center.
  • 8. A method of directional drilling comprising: positioning a depth-of-cut controlling feature of a drill bit away from a formation to prevent more than incidental contact between the depth-of-cut controlling feature while rotating the drill bit off-center to form a substantially straight borehole segment;positioning the depth-of-cut controlling feature of the drill bit into effective rubbing contact with the formation to control a depth-of-cut of cutters of the drill bit while rotating the drill bit on-center to form a non-linear borehole segment; andadjusting a cone angle between a blade face on a blade of the drill bit and a central longitudinal axis of the drill bit to provide at least one of removal of contact and contact between a depth-of-cut control feature and the formation.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein: positioning a depth-of-cut controlling feature of a drill bit away from a formation further comprises positioning at least one protrusion within a cone region of at least one blade of the drill bit away from more than incidental contact with the formation; andpositioning the depth-of-cut controlling feature of the drill bit into contact with the formation further comprises positioning the at least one protrusion within the cone region of the at least one blade of the drill bit into effective rubbing contact with the formation.
  • 10. A drill bit for subterranean drilling, having cutters defining a cutter profile extending from a gage region of at least one blade of the drill bit to a center axis of the drill bit and having at least a cone region and a nose region, the cutter profile comprising a concavity in the cone region of the cutter profile radially extending greater than a width of any single cutter defining the cutter profile, wherein all cutters defining the cutter profile are configured to simultaneously engage an earth formation, the drill bit comprising at least one insert in the cone region and rotationally trailing the concavity, the at least one insert sized and shaped to reduce an average exposure of cutters rotationally proceeding the at least one insert relative to the other cutters within the cone region.
  • 11. The drill bit of claim 10, wherein the concavity of the cutter profile is defined by cutters having a reduced average exposure.
  • 12. The drill bit of claim 10, wherein the at least one insert is positioned in at least one blade of the drill bit at, and substantially aligned with, a face of the at least one blade.
  • 13. The drill bit of claim 12, wherein the at least one insert comprises a carbide insert.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/248,777, filed Oct. 5, 2009, titled “DRILL BITS AND TOOLS FOR SUBTERRANEAN DRILLING, METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SUCH DRILL BITS AND TOOLS AND METHODS OF DIRECTIONAL AND OFF-CENTER DRILLING,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (119)
Number Name Date Kind
1805678 Smith May 1931 A
1923487 Howard et al. Aug 1933 A
2198849 Waxler Apr 1940 A
2563515 Brown Aug 1951 A
2624549 Wallace Jan 1953 A
2684835 Moore Jul 1954 A
2776817 Gregory et al. Jan 1957 A
3058535 Williams, Jr. Oct 1962 A
3153458 Short Oct 1964 A
3303894 Varney Feb 1967 A
3308896 Henderson Mar 1967 A
3536150 Stebley Oct 1970 A
3709308 Rowley et al. Jan 1973 A
3779323 Horten et al. Dec 1973 A
3915246 Sheshtawy Oct 1975 A
3938599 Horn Feb 1976 A
4006788 Garner Feb 1977 A
4116289 Feenstra Sep 1978 A
4176723 Arceneaux Dec 1979 A
4253533 Baker, III Mar 1981 A
4351401 Fielder Sep 1982 A
4386669 Evans Jun 1983 A
4499958 Radtke et al. Feb 1985 A
4512426 Bidegaray Apr 1985 A
4554986 Jones Nov 1985 A
4593777 Barr Jun 1986 A
4718505 Fuller Jan 1988 A
4763737 Hellnick Aug 1988 A
4815342 Brett et al. Mar 1989 A
4889017 Fuller et al. Dec 1989 A
4932484 Warren et al. Jun 1990 A
4942933 Barr et al. Jul 1990 A
4981184 Knowlton et al. Jan 1991 A
4982802 Warren et al. Jan 1991 A
4991670 Fuller et al. Feb 1991 A
5010789 Brett et al. Apr 1991 A
5033560 Sawyer et al. Jul 1991 A
5042596 Brett et al. Aug 1991 A
5090492 Keith Feb 1992 A
5111892 Sinor et al. May 1992 A
5131478 Brett et al. Jul 1992 A
5199511 Tibbitts et al. Apr 1993 A
5222566 Taylor et al. Jun 1993 A
5244039 Newton, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5265685 Keith et al. Nov 1993 A
5303785 Duke Apr 1994 A
5314033 Tibbitts May 1994 A
5388649 Ilomaki Feb 1995 A
5402856 Warren et al. Apr 1995 A
5433280 Smith Jul 1995 A
5437343 Cooley et al. Aug 1995 A
5447208 Lund et al. Sep 1995 A
5505273 Azar et al. Apr 1996 A
5531281 Murdock Jul 1996 A
5544550 Smith Aug 1996 A
5549171 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Aug 1996 A
5558170 Thigpen et al. Sep 1996 A
5582258 Tibbitts et al. Dec 1996 A
5595252 O'Hanlon Jan 1997 A
5607025 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Mar 1997 A
5651421 Newton et al. Jul 1997 A
5653300 Lund et al. Aug 1997 A
5663512 Schader et al. Sep 1997 A
5720357 Fuller et al. Feb 1998 A
5730234 Putot Mar 1998 A
5738178 Williams et al. Apr 1998 A
5839329 Smith et al. Nov 1998 A
5873422 Hansen et al. Feb 1999 A
5937958 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Aug 1999 A
5957006 Smith Sep 1999 A
5979576 Hansen et al. Nov 1999 A
6073518 Chow et al. Jun 2000 A
6089123 Chow et al. Jul 2000 A
6123161 Taylor Sep 2000 A
6142250 Griffin et al. Nov 2000 A
6200514 Meister Mar 2001 B1
6209420 Butcher et al. Apr 2001 B1
6246974 Jelley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6298930 Sinor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321862 Beuershausen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6408958 Isbell et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427792 Roberts et al. Aug 2002 B1
6450271 Tibbitts et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460631 Dykstra et al. Oct 2002 B2
6568492 Thigpen et al. May 2003 B2
6575256 Doster Jun 2003 B1
6581671 Butcher et al. Jun 2003 B2
6659199 Swadi Dec 2003 B2
6779613 Dykstra et al. Aug 2004 B2
6823952 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Nov 2004 B1
6834733 Maouche et al. Dec 2004 B1
6883623 McCormick et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892828 Rives May 2005 B2
6904983 Thigpen et al. Jun 2005 B2
6935441 Dykstra et al. Aug 2005 B2
7237628 Desai et al. Jul 2007 B2
7360608 Brackin et al. Apr 2008 B2
7395882 Oldham et al. Jul 2008 B2
7413032 Krueger Aug 2008 B2
7814997 Aliko et al. Oct 2010 B2
8127863 Durairajan et al. Mar 2012 B2
8141665 Ganz Mar 2012 B2
20010030063 Dykstra et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010030065 Beuershausen et al. Oct 2001 A1
20040244540 Oldham et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245022 Izaguirre et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245024 Kembaiyan Dec 2004 A1
20050211475 Mirchandani et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050230150 Oldham et al. Oct 2005 A1
20070017710 Achilles et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070151770 Ganz Jul 2007 A1
20070289782 Clark et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080308321 Aliko et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090145663 Durairajan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090145669 Durairajan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100270077 Huynh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100276200 Schwefe et al. Nov 2010 A1
20120168231 Ganz Jul 2012 A1
20120186879 Durairajan et al. Jul 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
0169683 Jan 1986 EP
0532869 Sep 1997 EP
0874128 Oct 1998 EP
0822318 Jun 2002 EP
1236861 Sep 2002 EP
2190120 Nov 1987 GB
2273946 Jul 1994 GB
2326659 Dec 1998 GB
2329203 Mar 1999 GB
2370592 Jul 2002 GB
2007070648 Jun 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/051504 mailed May 13, 2011, 3 pages.
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/051504 mailed May 13, 2011, 3 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/051504 dated Apr. 11, 2012, 4 pages.
Baker Hughes' Use of a Drill Bit Embodying the Alleged Inventions of the Asserted Claims of the 930 Patent Prior to Aug. 26, 1998, Expert Report of Mark Thompson, Jan. 18, 2008, Filed in Civil Action No. 6:06-CV-222 (LED) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Divisiion, 5 pages (nonmaterial portions redacted).
1995 Hughes Christensen Drill Bit Catalog, p. 31.
Christensen Diamond Compact Bit Manual, 1982, 89 pages.
Counterclaim-Defendants' Amended Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Rule 3-3, signed by James A. Jorgensen, Feb. 8, 2008, Filed in Civil Action No. 6:06-CV-222 (LED) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, 19 pages (nonmaterial portions redacted).
Drill Bit Developments, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Offshore Engineering Group, seminar held Apr. 26, 1989 in Aberdeen, Scotland.
Fabian, Robert T., Confined compressive strength analysis can improve PDC bit selection, Oil & Gas Journal, May 16, 1994, 5 pages.
Hughes Christensen Bit Drawing dated Sep. 18, 1996—HC Part No. CW 210655.
Hughes Christensen Bit Drawing dated Sep. 18, 1996—HC Part No. CS205023.
Hughes Christensen Bit Drawing dated May 29, 1997—HC Part No. CC201918.
Hughes Christensen Bit Drawing dated Sep. 9, 1996—HC Part No. CC201718.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/066947, mailed Mar. 11, 2008, 4 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/032370, mailed Jan. 3, 2011, 3 pages.
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/032370, mailed Jan. 3, 2011, 3 pages.
Maurer, William C., Advanced Drilling Techniques, 1980, pp. 541 and 568, The Petroleum Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Nussbaum , Mark E., Expert Report, dated Jan. 7, 2008, Filed in Civil Action No. 6:06-CV-222 (LED) in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, 57 pages (nonmaterial portions redacted).
Order Re Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice, United States District Court for the Easter District of Texas, Tyler Division, Civil Action No. 6:06-cv-222 (LED), dated Jun. 26, 2008.
International PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2006/047778 dated Jun. 4, 2007.
Plaintiffs' First Amended Reply to Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.'s and Baker Hughes, Inc.'s First Amended Answer and Counterclaims and Plaintiffs' Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Invalidity, Non-Infringement, and Unenforceability, Signed by J. Mike Amerson, dated Feb. 23, 2007, filed in Civil Action No. 6:06CV-222 (LED) in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, 11 pages (nonmaterial portions redacted).
Search Report of the Belgian Patent Office, dated Aug. 14, 2001, for Application No. BE20000528.
Search Report of the UK Patent Office, dated Dec. 7, 2000, for Application No. GB0020134.3.
Smith Diamond Drill Bit brochure, bit type M-21 IADC M646, 2 pages, circa 1990's.
Spaar, J.R., et al., Formation Compressive Strength Estimates for Predicting Drillability and PDC Bit Selection, SPE/IADC 29397, presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference held in Amsterdam, Feb. 29-Mar. 2, 1995.
Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice, United States District Court for the Easter District of Texas, Tyler Division, Civil Action No. 6:06-cv-222 (LED), dated Jun. 25, 2008.
Taylor, M.R., et al., High Penetration Rates and Extended Bit Life Through Revolutionary Hydraulic and Mechanical Design in PDC Drill Bit Development, SPE 36435, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, held in Denver, Colorado, Oct. 6-9, 1996, 14 pages.
Williams, J.L., et al., An Analysis of the Performance of PDC Hybrid Drill Bits, SPE/IADC 16117, presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, held in New Orleans, LA, on Mar. 15-18, 1987.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,802, filed May 15, 2013, 19 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110079438 A1 Apr 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61248777 Oct 2009 US