This invention relates generally to downhole tools for use in oil and gas wellbores, and methods of anchoring such apparatuses within the casing of the wellbore. This invention particularly relates to improving the engagement of slip elements within a casing or tubing. These slip elements are commonly used in setting or anchoring of a downhole drillable packer, bridge plug and frac plug tools.
In drilling or reworking oil wells, many varieties of downhole tools are used. For example, but not by way of limitation, it is often desirable to seal tubing or other pipe in the casing of the well by pumping cement or other slurry down the tubing, and forcing the slurry around the annulus of the tubing or out into a formation. It then becomes necessary to seal the tubing with respect to the well easing and to prevent the fluid pressure of the slurry from lifting the tubing out of the well, or for otherwise isolating specific zones in a well. Downhole tools referred to as packers, bridge plugs and frac plugs are designed for these general purposes, and are well known in the art of producing oil and gas.
Both packers and bridge plugs are used to isolate the portion of the well below the packer or bridge plug from the portion of the well thereabove. Accordingly, packers and bridge plugs may experience a high differential pressure, and must be capable of withstanding the pressure so that the packer or bridge plug seals the well, and does not move in the well after being set.
Packers and bridge plugs used with a downhole tool both make use of metallic or non-metallic slip assemblies, or slips, that are initially retained in close proximity to a mandrel. These packers and bridge plugs are forced outwardly away from the mandrel upon the downhole tool being set to engage a casing previously installed within an open wellbore. Upon positioning the downhole tool at the desired depth, or position, a setting tool or other means of exerting force, or loading, upon the downhole tool forces the slips to expand radially outward against the inside of the casing to anchor the packer, or bridge plug, so that the downhole tool will not move relative to the casing. Once set, additional force, in the form of increased hydraulic pressure, is commonly applied to further set the downhole tool. Unfortunately, the increased pressure commonly causes the downhole tool to slip up or down the casing.
To prevent slipping of the downhole tool, cylindrically shaped inserts, or buttons, are secured to the slip segments to enhance the ability of the slip segments to engage the well casing. The buttons must be of sufficient hardness to be able to partially penetrate, or bite into the surface of the well casing, which is typically steel. Unfortunately, the buttons will occasionally disintegrate under increased force, or higher pressures, thereby allowing the downhole tool to slide within the well.
Alternatively, slip segments may have a plurality of wickers positioned about them to engage and secure the slip segments within the casing. The wickers must be sufficiently hard to engage and deformably cut into the well casing. Unfortunately, the amount of force required to cause the plurality of wickers to engage the well casing is significant, and often exceeds that of a setting tool. Thus, until sufficient force is exerted upon the wickers, the wickers may not fully engage the casing, thereby allowing the tool to slide significant distances within the well prior to engaging the casing.
In one embodiment, an apparatus for anchoring a downhole tool in a well is provided. The apparatus comprises a mandrel and a slip assembly. The slip assembly is positioned on the mandrel. The slip assembly has at least one slip ring. The slip ring has an outer surface. A plurality of buttons are secured to and extending outwardly from the outer surface of the slip ring. The buttons define a first anchor. There are a plurality of wickers integrally formed on the slip ring. The plurality of wickers define a second anchor.
In another embodiment, a two-stage downhole anchor is provided. The two-stage downhole anchor comprises a mandrel and a slip assembly. The slip assembly is positioned on the mandrel. The slip assembly has at least one outwardly expandable slip ring and at least one slip wedge. The slip ring defines a first surface and the slip wedge defines a complementary second surface. The first surface is positioned against the complementary second surface of the slip wedge. The slip wedge and slip ring are movable relative to one another when force is applied to the slip assembly, whereby the slip ring will expand radially outward in response to such movement. There are a plurality of buttons secured to the slip ring, wherein the buttons define a first-stage anchor. There are a plurality of wickers defined on the slip ring, wherein the plurality of wickers define a second-stage anchor.
In yet another embodiment, a force-responsive apparatus for anchoring a downhole tool in a well is provided. The force responsive apparatus comprises a mandrel and at least one slip assembly that is positioned on the mandrel. The slip assembly has at least one slip ring and at least one slip wedge. Each slip ring has a plurality of radially expandable slip segments. There are a plurality of buttons secured to, and extending outwardly from, the slip segments, wherein the buttons are positioned to engage an inner wall of the casing in response to a first input force. There are a plurality of wickers defined on the slip ring. Each of the wickers have a cutting edge extending therefrom, wherein the wicker are positioned to deformably engage the inner wall of the casing in response to a second input force.
In still another embodiment, an apparatus for anchoring a downhole tool in a well is provided. The apparatus comprises a mandrel and a slip assembly. The slip assembly is positioned on the mandrel. The slip assembly has at least one slip ring. The slip ring has an outer surface. At least one button is secured to and extending outwardly from the outer surface of the slip ring. The button defines a first anchor. There is at least one wicker integrally formed on the slip ring. The wicker defines a second anchor.
Referring to the drawings,
By way of a non-limiting example, downhole tool 16 illustrated in
As illustrated in
Slip ring 36, shown in
Slip rings 36 are comprised of a drillable material and may be, for example, cast iron or a molded phenolic. Slip rings 36 may be made from other drillable materials such as drillable metals, composites and engineering grade plastics. The remainder of slip assembly 34 and other components of the tool may likewise be made from drillable materials.
Although main slip ring body 48 is illustrated as a fracturable slip ring 36 in
Referring to
Slip rings 36 may be moved or radially expanded from the unset to the set position, which is illustrated in
Frangible retaining ring 51 may be made from a metal, or a composite, such as a fiberglass. However, frangible retaining ring 51 may comprise any material, preferably a drillable material, which will provide adequate strength to prevent premature breakage.
Slip assemblies 34a and 34b are illustrated in
Referring to
Buttons 58 are comprised of a material having sufficient hardness to penetrate or bite into casing 14. Each button 58 has button edge 62 defining the point of engagement for button 58 with casing 14. Collectively, when buttons 58 engage inner wall 15 of casing 14, buttons 58 define the aforementioned first-stage anchor 60, also referred to as a first anchor, for slip ring 36.
Preferably, buttons 58 are made from a material selected from the group consisting of tungsten carbide, ceramic, metallic-ceramic, zirconia-ceramic titanium, molybdenum, nickel and combinations thereof. Additionally, buttons 58 may be, for example, similar in material and form as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,007, which is incorporated by reference herein. Buttons 58 may be made from any material that can pierce the casing or is harder than the casing grade utilized for casing 14. Casing grades are the industry standardized measures of casing-strength properties. Since most oilfield casing is of approximately the same chemistry (typically steel), and differs only in the heat treatment applied, the grading system provides for standardized strengths of casing to be manufactured and used in wellbores.
Slip ring 36 also has a plurality of wickers 64 integrally defined thereon. Wickers 64 may be formed on slip ring 36 or they may be secured thereto. Wickers 64 define cutting edges 66, which securely engage inner wall 15 of casing 14, thereby retaining downhole tool 16 within casing 14. Cutting edges 66 are the outermost edge of wickers 64 for engaging casing 14. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Wickers 64 define a second-stage anchor 70, also referred to as a second set of anchors, for slip ring 36 as part of downhole tool 16. In particular, cutting edges 66 of wickers 64 define second-stage anchor 70. Collectively, buttons 58 and cutting edges 66 of wickers 64 form an expandable two-stage downhole anchor.
In operation, downhole tool 16 is positioned at the desired depth or location by a setting tool, such as a wireline. The wireline exerts an initial or first force upon slip assembly 34, causing slip wedge 38 and slip ring 36 to move relative to one another, which radially exerts an internal radial force upon slip ring 36. Slip ring 36 radially expands outward as complementary second surface 42 slides against first surface 40. The sliding, effect of complementary second surface 42 against first surface 40 causes slip ring 36 to force buttons 58 against the inner wall of casing 14, which in turn causes button edge 62 of buttons 58 to engage the inner wall of casing 14. As the radial force is increased, buttons 58 penetrate into inner wall 15 of casing 14. This radial force is sufficient to penetrate the casing grade for the particular casing 14 utilized.
Cutting edges 66 of wickers 64 may engage the inner wall of casing 14 at the same time buttons 58 engage inner wall 15 of casing 14. However, the exertion of a second, and substantially greater force upon downhole tool 16 and slip assembly 34 causes complementary second surface 42 of slip wedge 38 to further slide against first surface 40 of slip ring 36. The second force causes slip ring 36 to further radially expand outward, and forces cutting edges 66 to deformably engage the inner wall 15 of casing 14. This second force is the point when button 58 reaches its shear value, or when button 58 has been compromised to the point of load sharing or load transfer. The second force may be any form of force exerted upon slip assembly 34, but is commonly a hydraulic force. This force responsive action sets the aforementioned two-stage anchor of downhole tool 16. Accordingly, downhole tool 16, as associated with the aforementioned elements, forms a force responsive apparatus for anchoring downhole tool 16.
Because buttons edges 62 and cutting edges 66 engage casing 14, each button 58 and wicker 64 must have a hardness rating exceeding that of casing 14. By way of a non-limiting example, wicker 64 has a hardness rating capable of deforming an API P110 casing upon application of a sufficient force to slip assembly 34. The result of the application of the sufficient force to wicker 64 is that downhole tool 16 is set, but buttons 58 are crushed. Sufficient forces to set wicker 64 often exceed the crush strength of buttons 58, especially ones that are ceramic material.
Other embodiments of the current invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of this specification or practice of the invention disclosed herein. Thus, the foregoing specification is considered merely exemplary of the current invention with the true scope thereof being defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2368928 | King | Feb 1945 | A |
3339637 | Holden | Sep 1967 | A |
4151875 | Sullaway | May 1979 | A |
4185689 | Harris | Jan 1980 | A |
4457369 | Henderson | Jul 1984 | A |
4765404 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5224540 | Streich et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5390737 | Jacobi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5701959 | Hushbeck et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5839515 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857520 | Mullen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5944102 | Kilgore et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5984007 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6102117 | Swor et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132844 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6315041 | Carlisle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6474419 | Maier et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6481497 | Swor et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6598672 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6695051 | Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6793022 | Vick et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7373973 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7472746 | Maier | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7779927 | Turley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030150607 | Roberts | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040045723 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050121202 | Abercrombie Simpson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20090038790 | Barlow | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 052 369 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 052 369 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 197 632 | Apr 2002 | EP |
WO 2004070163 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2007058864 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2009019483 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009019483 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Halliburton Sales & Service Catalog 43, pp. 2561-2562 and 2556-2557 (1985). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 19, 2011, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/GB2010/001850. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 8, 2013, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/GB2011/001517. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 2, 2013, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/GB2011/001517. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120097384 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |