1. Field of the Disclosure
The present invention relates to an apparatus for drilling a subterranean bore hole, particularly but not exclusively an oil, gas or geothermal well, using a technique known as managed pressure drilling.
2. Description of Related Art
The drilling of a borehole or well is typically carried out using a steel pipe known as a drill string with a drill bit on the lowermost end. The entire drill string may be rotated using an over-ground drilling motor, or the drill bit may be rotated independently of the drill string using a fluid powered motor or motors mounted in the drill string just above the drill bit. As drilling progresses, a flow of mud is used to carry the debris created by the drilling process out of the borehole. Mud is pumped through an inlet line down the drill string to pass through the drill bit, and returns to the surface via the annular space between the outer diameter of the drill string and the borehole (generally referred to as the annulus). Mud is a very broad drilling term, and in this context it is used to describe any fluid or fluid mixture used during drilling and covers a broad spectrum from air, nitrogen, misted fluids in air or nitrogen, foamed fluids with air or nitrogen, aerated or nitrified fluids to heavily weighted mixtures of oil or water with solid particles. Significant pressure is required to drive the mud along this flow path, and to achieve this, the mud is typically pumped into the drill string using one or more positive displacement pumps which are connected to the drill string via a pipe and manifold known as the standpipe manifold.
The geological formations into which such boreholes are typically drilled often comprise a reservoir of pressurised fluid (oil, gas and/or water), and the mud flow, in addition to flushing out the debris and cooling the drill bit, pressurises the borehole, thus substantially preventing uncontrolled flow of fluid from the formation into the borehole. Flow of formation fluid into the borehole is known as a kick, and, if not controlled, can lead to a blow out. Whilst pressurising the borehole is required to avoid kicks or a blow out, if the fluid pressure in the borehole is too high, the fluid pressure could cause the formation to fracture, and/or mud could penetrate and be lost to the formation. Thus, whilst the pressure provided by the weight of the mud in the bore hole, and the dynamic pressure created by the pumping of the mud into the borehole may be enough to contain the fluid in the formation, for many formations greater and faster control over the fluid pressure in the borehole is required, and one drilling method suitable for drilling into such formations is managed pressure drilling (MPD).
Managed pressure drilling (MPD) involves controlling the bottom hole pressure by the application of a back-pressure to mud exiting from the annulus of the borehole. The most relevant elements of a conventional prior art managed pressure drilling system are illustrated schematically in
The borehole 10′ is capped with a well head 18′, and a closure device 20′ such as a rotating blow out preventer (BOP) or rotating control device (RCD). The drill string 12′ extends through the well head 18 and closure device 20′, the closure device 20′ having seals which close around the exterior of the drill string 12′ to provide a substantially fluid tight seal around the drill string 12′ whilst allowing the drill string to rotate about its longitudinal axis, and to be reciprocated into and out of the borehole 10′. Together, the well head 18′ and closure device 20′ isolate the fluid in the annulus 16′.
In this example, the drill string 12′ extends from the closure device 20′ to a driving apparatus 22′ such as a top drive, and the uppermost end of the drill string 12′ is connected to the outlet port of a standpipe manifold 24′ which has an inlet port connected by an inlet line to a mud pump 26′. The well head 18′ includes a side port 18a′ which is connected to an annulus return line 28′, and which provides an outlet for fluid from the annulus 16′. The annulus return line 28′ extends to a mud reservoir 34′ via an adjustable choke or valve 30′ and a Coriolis flow meter 32′ which is downstream of the choke/valve 30′. Filters and/or shakers (not shown) are generally provided to remove particulate matter such as drill cuttings from the mud prior to its return to the mud reservoir 34′.
During drilling, the top drive 22′ rotates the drill string 12′ about its longitudinal axis so that the drill bit cuts into the formation, and the pump 26′ is operated to pump mud from the reservoir 34′ to the standpipe manifold 24′ and into the drill string 12′ where it flows into the annulus 16′ via the BHA 14′. The mud and drill cuttings flow up the annulus 16′ to the well head 18′, and into the annulus return line 28′, and the adjustable choke or valve 32′ is operated to restrict flow of this fluid along the annulus return line 28′, and, therefore, to apply a back-pressure is applied to the annulus 16′. This back-pressure is increased until the fluid pressure at the bottom of the wellbore 10′ (the bottom hole pressure) is deemed sufficient to contain the formation fluids in the formation 11′ whilst minimising the risk of fracturing the formation or causing mud to penetrate the formation. The rate of flow of fluid out of the annulus 16′ is monitored using the flow meter 32′, and compared with the rate of fluid into the drill string 12′, and this data may be used to detect a kick or loss of mud to the formation.
Such a system is, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,244, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,044,237.
Managed pressure drilling systems in which a pump is provided to assist in the development of the required bottom hole pressure by pumping mud back into the annulus 16 via the annulus return line are also known and are, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,185,719, U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,878, US 2007/0151762, WO 2007/081711, and WO 2008/051978.
According to a first aspect of the invention we provide a drilling system including a drill string which extends into a borehole, and a well closure system which contains fluid in the annular space in the borehole around the drill string, the well closure system having a side port whereby controlled flow of fluid out of the annular space in the borehole around the drill string is permitted, the side port being connected to fluid return line which extends from the side port to a fluid reservoir, there being provided in the fluid return line a valve which is operable to restrict flow of fluid along the fluid return line to variable extent, and a flow meter operable to measure the rate of flow of fluid along the fluid return line, the flow meter being located between the valve and the side port, wherein a filter is provided between the flow meter and the side port, the filter including a plurality of apertures which have a smaller cross-sectional area than the smallest fluid flow lines in the flow meter.
Preferably the flow meter is a Coriolis flow meter.
The flow meter may be located in a branch line off the fluid return line which extends between a first portion of the fluid return line and a second portion of the fluid return line, the first portion being located between the side port and the second portion. In this case, preferably the filter is located at or adjacent to the junction between the branch line and the first portion of the fluid return line. The filter may have an edge or edges which are located at the junction between the branch line and the first portion of the fluid return line, and a central portion which extends into the branch line.
Preferably an active sonar flow meter is provided to measure the rate of fluid flow along the fluid return line. In this case, the active sonar flow meter is preferably located between the side port and the Coriolis flow meter. The active sonar flow meter may be a clamp-on meter.
Advantageously, an inlet line extends into the drill string from a pump, and a second active sonar flow meter is provided to measure the rate of fluid flow along the inlet line. In this case, the second active sonar flow meter is preferable a clamp-on meter.
According to a second aspect of the invention we provide a drilling system including a drill string which extends into a borehole, and a well closure system which contains fluid in the annular space in the borehole around the drill string, the well closure system having a side port whereby controlled flow of fluid out of the annular space in the borehole around the drill string is permitted, the side port being connected to fluid return line which extends from the side port to a fluid reservoir, there being provided in the fluid return line a valve which includes a valve member which is rotatable to restrict flow of fluid along the fluid return line to variable extent.
Preferably the valve includes a valve body, the valve body having a passage with a longitudinal axis which extends from a valve inlet to a valve outlet, the passage forming part of the fluid return line, and wherein the valve member is a generally spherical ball which is mounted in the passage of the valve body. In this case, the valve member preferably includes a central passage which extends through the ball and which has a longitudinal axis, the valve member being rotatable between a closed position in which the longitudinal axis of the central passage extends at around 90° to the longitudinal axis of the passage in the valve body, and an open position in which the longitudinal axis of the central passage is generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the passage in the valve body. The cross-section of the central passage perpendicular to its longitudinal axis may taper from a short side to a tall side, the height of the central passage increasing generally linearly from the short side to the tall side.
The ball may be arranged in the valve body such that when rotated from the closed position to the open position, the short side of the central passage is first to open into the passage of the valve body. The cross-section of the central passage perpendicular to its longitudinal axis may have the shape of a sector of a circle.
The valve may be provided with an actuator stem, rotation of which about its longitudinal axis causes rotation of the valve member between the open position and the closed position. In this case, the actuator stem preferably has a pinion portion with a plurality of radial teeth, and the valve is provided with at least one actuator piston with a toothed rod which engages with the pinion portion of the actuator stem so that translational movement of the piston causes rotation of the actuator stem and valve member. The valve may be provided with four actuator pistons each with a toothed rod which engages with the pinion portion of the actuator stem.
The or each piston may be mounted in an actuator housing and engages with the actuator housing so that the actuator housing and piston enclose a control chamber, the actuator housing being provided with a conduit whereby fluid flow into the control chamber.
According to a third aspect of the invention we provide a valve including a valve member and a valve body having a passage with a longitudinal axis which extends from a valve inlet to a valve outlet, wherein the valve member is a generally spherical ball which is mounted in the passage of the valve body and includes a central passage which extends through the ball and which has a longitudinal axis, the valve member being rotatable between a closed position in which the longitudinal axis of the central passage extends at around 90° to the longitudinal axis of the passage in the valve body, and an open position in which the longitudinal axis of the central passage is generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the passage in the valve body, wherein the cross-section of the central passage perpendicular to its longitudinal axis tapers from a short side to a tall side, the height of the central passage increasing generally linearly from the short side to the tall side.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention we provide a drilling system including a drill string which extends into a borehole, and a well closure system which contains fluid in the annular space in the borehole around the drill string, the well closure system having a side port whereby controlled flow of fluid out of the annular space in the borehole around the drill string is permitted, the side port being connected to fluid return line which extends from the side port to a fluid reservoir, the drilling system also including a valve, the valve having an inlet port which is connected to the fluid return line, a first outlet port which is connected to a gas separator apparatus for separating entrained gas from a liquid, a second outlet port which is connected to a solid separator apparatus for separating solid particles from a liquid, wherein the valve is operable to selectively permit flow of fluid from the inlet port to either the first outlet port or the second outlet port whilst never preventing flow of fluid from the inlet port to both of the outlet ports.
Preferably the gas separator has an outlet for liquid which is connected to an inlet of the solid separator.
Preferably the solid separator has an outlet for liquid which is connected to the reservoir.
Advantageously, the solid separator comprises at least one shaker.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings of which,
Referring now to
The borehole 10 is capped with a well head 18, and a closure device 20 such as a rotating blow out preventer (BOP) or rotating control device (RCD). The drill string 12 extends through the well head 18 and closure device 20, the closure device 20 having seals closure around the exterior of the drill string 12 to provide a substantially fluid tight seal around the drill string 12 whilst allowing the drill string to rotate about its longitudinal axis, and to be moved further down into and out of the borehole 10. Together, the well head 18 and closure device 20 contain the fluid in the annulus 16.
In this example, the drill string 12 extends from the closure device 20 to a driving apparatus 22 such as a top drive, and the uppermost end of the drill string 12 is connected to the outlet port of a standpipe manifold 24 which has an inlet port connected by an inlet line 25 to a mud pump 26. A flow meter 46 in this embodiment of the invention a clamp-on active sonar meter, is mounted on the inlet line 25 between the mud pump 26 and the standpipe manifold 24, and this provides an output signal indicative of the rate of mud flow into the drill string 12.
In standard managed pressure drilling systems, the rate of fluid flow into the drill string 12 is measured by counting the number of strokes of the pump 26, for example using piston stroke counter whiskers, piston stroke counter proximity sensors or pump drive shaft rpm sensors, and multiplying this by the volume of fluid displaced per stroke. These methods are all mechanical and record mechanical activity of the pump rather than measuring the fluid flow directly. As such, all are of variable reliability and accuracy and are prone to failure. In contrast, an active sonar meter provides a direct, accurate and reliable measurement of the fluid flow into the drill string 12.
The standard mechanical equipment for measuring the injected fluid flow rate as described above is advantageously provided in addition to the active sonar meter 46, and therefore can be used to calibrate the active sonar meter 46 prior to commencement of drilling.
The well head 18 includes a side port 18a which is connected to an annulus return line 28, and which provides an outlet for fluid from the annulus 16. The annulus return line 28 extends to a mud reservoir 34 via a novel back pressure system 36 which is illustrated in more detail in
Referring now to
A first further fluid flow line 28a (hereinafter referred to as the Coriolis meter line) extends from the annulus return line 28 between the active sonar flow meter 38 and the choke 30a to a Coriolis type flow meter via an upstream filter 40. The filter 40 comprises either a mesh screen or a perforated sheet which is located at the junction between the Coriolis meter line 28a and the annulus return line 28 as illustrated in
Coriolis flow meters are often used in drilling systems, so the construction and operation of these are well-known to those of skill in the art. Briefly, however, the Coriolis meter comprises two tubes, fluid flowing into the meter being split between the two tubes, so that half flows along each tube before leaving the meter. A drive coil is provided, and this is configured such that passage of an electrical current through this causes the tubes to vibrate at their natural frequency, each in the opposite sense to the other. A magnet and coil assembly called a pick-off is mounted on each tube. As each tube vibrates, each coil moves through the magnetic field produced by the magnet on the other tube, and this induces a sinusoidal voltage in each coil. When there is no fluid flow through the meter, the voltages induced in each coil are in phase. When there is fluid flow, Coriolis forces are induced causing the tubes to twist in the opposite direction to each other, and this causes the voltages in the coils to be out of phase by an amount δt which is proportional to the mass flow rate through the tubes. This amount δt can be determined and used to provide an output signal which gives a highly accurate (up to around 0.1% of the total flow rate) value for the mass flow rate through the meter.
The output signal from all of the flow meters 32, 38, 46 is transmitted using standard telecommunications means to a central drilling control unit (not shown) which has a processor which is programmed to compare the rate of fluid flow into the bore hole 10 with the rate of fluid flow out of the borehole 10. If fluid is being injected into the borehole 10 at a higher rate than it is leaving the borehole 10, this indicates that some fluid is being lost to the formation and a reduction in bottom hole pressure is desirable. Alternatively, if the rate of flow of fluid out of the borehole 10 is significantly higher than the rate of flow of fluid into the borehole 10, this indicates that a kick of formation fluid has entered the borehole 10, and that an increase in bottom hole pressure may be desirable to stop this influx and that action needs to be taken to deal with the formation fluids already in the borehole 10. It will be appreciated that for this control mechanism to be effective, receiving accurate and reliable data from the flow meters 32, 38, 46 is critical.
The provision of two meters for measuring flow along the annulus return line 28 is advantageous as, if one meter is disrupted or fails, the other meter is available for monitoring the flow rate. Moreover, by virtue of using two different types of meter, the output from one meter can be compared with the output from the other for calibration purposes and to give an indication of the accuracy and reliability of the meters.
Both these meters only work well for measuring liquid flow rates, and the accuracy of the output of a flow meter deteriorates if there is any entrained gas in the liquid. When drilling into a formation it is quite common for some hydrocarbon gas to be present in the drilling mud. The hydrocarbon gas may be released as the formation is drilled away or produced from productive fractures or reservoir sands adjacent to the borehole 10 before the drilling mud can create an effective seal and filter cake over the borehole face. Whilst the drilling mud is under pressure in the annulus 16 and the annulus return line 28, this gas is either in solution in the drilling mud or compressed to its liquid state. The pressure in the annulus return line 28 downstream of the choke 30a is significantly lower than the pressure in the annulus return line 28 upstream of the choke 30a. As such, as the drilling mud exits the choke 30a, the entrained gas is depressurised, expands, and forms bubbles of gas in the liquid mud. The flow meter is positioned downstream of the choke in standard MPD systems, and these gas bubbles have a detrimental effect on the accuracy of the mass flow measurements obtained from the flow meter, and can even completely disrupt the flow of data from the meter. As discussed above, the mass flow readings are used for detecting kicks or loss of mud to the formation, and so the accuracy of these readings is vital to the stability of the drilling process. This problem is avoided in the present invention by positioning both the flow meters 32, 38 upstream of the choke 30a.
The provision of the filter 40 is advantageous because, without it, the two tubes in the Coriolis flow meter 32 could easily become blocked with particulate debris in the returning fluid, as these tubes each have a smaller cross-section sectional area than the Coriolis meter line 28a. Blocking of the Coriolis flow meter 32 could cause the fluid pressure in the system upstream of the flow meter 32 to increase to such an extent that the flow meter 32 or the piping of the Coriolis flow line 28a or annulus return line 28 is damaged or fails completely.
The apertures in the filter 40 are significantly smaller than the cross-section of these tubes so that any debris 42 which is sufficiently large to block the tubes is trapped by the filter 40 and prevented from entering the Coriolis meter 40, as illustrated in
Whilst the provision of the filter 40 minimises the risk of damage to the system because of blocking of the Coriolis flow meter 32, in this embodiment of the invention, as a further safety precaution, the system 36 is provided with a pressure relief line 28b which extends from the annulus return line 28 between the active sonar meter 38 and the Coriolis meter line 28a to a main pressure relief valve 44. This pressure relief valve 44 is a standard pop off type pressure relief valve which normally substantially prevents fluid from flowing along the pressure relief line 28b but which is configured to open to allow fluid to flow along the pressure relief line 28b when the pressure upstream of the valve exceeds a predetermined value. The predetermined value is typically 50 psi below the maximum operating pressure of the lowest pressure rated component in the drilling system, which is usually the closure device 20.
The pressure relief line 28b is also provided with a branch 28b′ which extends from the pressure relief line 28b upstream of the main pressure relief valve 44 to downstream of the main pressure relief valve 44. This branch 28b′ therefore provides a conduit for fluid to flow along the pressure relief line 28b′, by-passing the main pressure relief valve 44. In this branch line 28b′ is provided an adjustable pressure relief valve 46. This valve 46 normally substantially prevents fluid from flowing along the branch line 28b′, and the operation of the valve 46 is controlled by an electronic control unit which receives a pressure signal from a pressure sensor in the BHA 14, the annulus 16 or annulus return line 28 downstream of the pressure relief line 28b. The electronic control unit is programmed to compare this pressure signal with the desired bottom hole pressure/annulus pressure/annulus return line pressure, and to open the valve 46 if the difference is greater than a predetermined margin. In other words, the adjustable pressure relief valve 46 is set to open at a pressure which is greater by a predetermined margin than either the desired bottom hole pressure, annulus pressure or back pressure to be applied to the annulus 16 by the back pressure control system 36. As the desired pressure is constantly changing, the valve 46 is actively adjusted to maintain that predetermined margin whilst drilling progresses. The margin, and which pressure signal is used as a basis for comparison with the set point will depend on the type of formation being drilled.
For example, the adjustable pressure relief valve 46 may be set to open at a pressure margin of 50 psi above the bottom hole pressure set point. In this case, if the system is set to maintain the bottom hole pressure at 200 psi, the adjustable pressure relief valve 46 will be set to open if the pressure signal from the pressure sensor in the BHA 14 indicates that the bottom hole pressure is greater than 250 psi.
Both pressure relief valves 44, 46 are provided with means for communicating with the main drilling control unit so that if either valve 44, 46 is activated, i.e. opens because the maximum permitted pressure was exceeded, an electronic signal is transmitted to the main drilling control unit which may then display or sound a warning to alert an operator that there is a problem with the drilling system.
These pressure relief valves thus protect from damage caused by excess pressure build up from blocking or plugging of any component of the back pressure control system 36 downstream of the pressure relief line 28b. The main pressure relief valve 44 primarily protects the surface MPD equipment including the closure device 20, whilst the primary role of the adjustable pressure relief valve 46 is to protect the casing and formation, and to prevent the formation fracturing and drilling mud being lost to the formation.
Whilst only one back pressure control valve 30a is required to facilitate managed pressure drilling, in this embodiment of the invention, a second back pressure control valve 30b is provided in an annulus return relief line 28c which extends from the annulus return line 28 between the Coriolis meter line 28a and the first back pressure control valve 30a to a point on the annulus return line 28 downstream of the first back pressure control valve 30a. The second back pressure control valve 30b is normally closed so that there is no fluid flow along the annulus return relief line 28c, and the back pressure on the annulus 16 is controlled solely by operation of the first back pressure control valve 30a. If the first back pressure control valve 30a fails or becomes blocked, this valve is closed, and the second back pressure control valve 30b is opened so that all the fluid flow along the annulus return line 28 passes through the annulus return relief line 28c. The back pressure is then controlled by operation of the second back pressure control valve 30b.
During a typical managed pressure drilling operation, the back pressure control valve 30a or 30b is used to apply a back pressure of between 300 and 500 psi to the annulus 16. To achieve this all the components of the drilling system, including the closure device 20 and the back pressure control system 36 are preferably pressure rated to 1500 psi drilling and 2200 psi shut in pressure. Whilst a higher pressure rated system may, of course, be used, using a lower pressure rated system is advantageous as equipment with a lower pressure rating tends to be more widely available and less expensive.
This also allows a standard Coriolis meter (these are generally pressure rated to 1500 to 2000 psi) to be placed upstream of the back pressure control valves 30a, 30b.
Whilst the back pressure control valves 30a and 30b may be any known configuration of adjustable choke or valve which is operable to restrict the flow of fluid along a conduit to a variable extent, they are advantageously air configured as illustrated in
Referring now to
The diameter of the ball 48 is greater than the internal diameter of the valve body 50, and therefore the internal surface of the valve body 50 is shaped to provide a circumferential annular recess in which the ball 48 is seated. The ball 48 is connected to an actuator stem 52 which extends through an aperture provided in the valve body 50 generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the central passage of the valve body 50 into an actuator housing 54. The actuator stem 52 is a generally cylindrical rod which is rotatable about its longitudinal axis within the actuator housing 54, and which has a pinion section providing radial teeth extending over at least a portion of the length of the actuator stem 52.
Referring now to
Each piston 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d has an actuator rod 62a, 62b, 62c, 62d which extends generally perpendicular to the plane of the piston 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d towards the actuator stem 52. Each actuator rod 62a, 62b, 62c, 62d is provided with teeth which engage with the teeth of the pinion section of the actuator rod 52 to form a rack and pinion arrangement. Translational movement of the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d thus causes the actuator rod 52 and ball 48 to rotate.
An electrical or electronic rotation sensor 64, is, in this embodiment of the invention, mounted on the free end of the actuator stem 52 and transmits to the central drilling control unit an output signal indicative of the rotational orientation of the actuator stem 52 and ball 48 relative to the actuator housing 54 and valve body 50.
The ball 48 is provided with a central passage 48a which is best illustrated in
The ball 48 is rotatable through 90° between a fully closed position in which the longitudinal axis B of the central passage 48a is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the valve body 50, and a fully open position in which the longitudinal axis B of the central passage 48a coincides with the longitudinal axis of the valve body 50, as illustrated in
Between the fully open and fully closed position, there are a plurality of partially open positions in which a varying proportion of the cross-section of the central passage 48a is exposed to fluid in the valve body 50, as illustrated in
The ball 48 is oriented in the valve body 50 such that when the valve moves from the fully closed position to the fully open position, the short side of the central passage 48a is exposed first to the fluid in the valve body 50, the tall side of the central passage 48a being last to be exposed. The height of the passage 48a exposed to fluid in the valve body 50 thus increases as the ball 48 is rotated to the fully open position.
The central passage in a conventional ball valve is generally circular in cross-sectional area. The use of a central passage 48a with a sector shaped cross-section is advantageous as this ensures that there is a generally linear relationship between the angular orientation of the ball 48 and the degree of restriction of fluid flow along the valve body 50 over at least a substantial proportion of the range of movement of the ball 48. This means that it may be possible to control the back pressure applied to the annulus 16 to a higher degree of accuracy than in prior art managed pressure drilling systems.
The use of a ball valve is also advantageous because when the valve 30a, 30b is in the fully open position, the cross-sectional area available for fluid flow along the valve body 50 is substantially the same as the flow area along the flow line into the valve 30a, 30b. This means that if debris enters the valve 30a, 30b and blocks the central passage 48a of the ball 48 when the valve 30a, 30b is in a partially open position, the valve 30a, 30b can be unblocked and the debris flushed away by moving the ball 48 to the fully open position.
Whilst the valve 30a, 30b can be hydraulically actuated, preferably it is pneumatically operated, in this example using compressed air. The apertures 60a, 60b, 60c and 60d in the actuator housing 54 are connected to a compressed air reservoir and a conventional pneumatic control valve (not shown) is provided to control fluid of compressed air to the chambers 58a, 58b, 58c, 58d. Flow of pressurised fluid into the chambers 58a, 58b, 58c, 58d causes translational movement of the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d towards the actuator stem 52, which, by virtue of the engagement of the rods 62a, 62b, 62c, 62d with the pinion section of the actuator stem 52 causes the ball 48 to rotate towards the fully closed position.
A further aperture 61 is provided in the actuator housing 54, and this aperture extends into the central space in the housing 54 which is enclosed by the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d. Flow of pressurised fluid through the further aperture 61 into this central space causes translational movement of the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d away from the actuator stem 52, which, by virtue of the engagement of the rods 62a, 62b, 62c, 62d with the pinion section of the actuator stem 52 causes the ball 48 to rotate towards the fully open position.
The pneumatic control valve is electrically operated via the central drilling control unit which receives an input signal indicative of the fluid pressure at the bottom of the borehole 10 from a pressure sensor in the BHA 14. The central drilling control unit then uses standard MPD control algorithms to calculate the desired bottom hole pressure, and compares this with the actual bottom hole pressure.
If the bottom hole pressure is less than desired, the pneumatic control valve operates to allow compressed air flow to the chambers 58a, 58b, 58c, 58d. This causes the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d to move towards the actuator stem 52, and to rotate the ball 48 towards the fully closed position so that the restriction of fluid flow along the valve body 50 increases, and the back pressure applied to the annulus 16 increases. When the measured bottom hole pressure reaches the desired value, the pneumatic control valve operates to stop flow of fluid into or out of the chambers 58a, 58b, 58c, 58d, and hence to stop any further movement of the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d.
Similarly, if the bottom hole pressure is greater than desired, the pneumatic control valve operates to supply compressed air to aperture 61 to cause the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d to move away from the actuator stem 52, and to rotate the ball 48 towards the fully open position so that the restriction of fluid flow along the valve body 50 decreases, and the back pressure applied to the annulus 16 decreases. When the measured bottom hole pressure reaches the desired value, the pneumatic control valve operates to stop any further movement of the pistons 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d.
Actuating the valve pneumatically, rather than using hydraulic fluid, is advantageous as it increases the speed of operation of the valve. This is further increases by having a valve member which is rotatable between the open and closed positions, and the use of a rack-and-pinion arrangement to rotate the valve member. Whilst the valve could be actuated using a single piston, the provision of a plurality of pistons (in this example four) is advantageous as it increases the torque available to rotate the ball 48 without having a detrimental effect on the speed of operation of the valve.
The back pressure control system 36 also includes a three way diverter valve 66 with an inlet 66a connected to the annulus return line 28 downstream of the back pressure control valves 30a, 30b, a first outlet 66b connected to a mud gas separator 68 and a second outlet 66c connected to a shaker system 70. The shaker system is of conventional design and is operable to remove any solid matter from the returned drilling mud, whilst the mud gas separator removes any entrained gases. The pressure relief line 28b extends from the pressure relief valves 44, 46 to a further inlet of the mud gas separator, and an outlet of the mud gas separator is also connected to the shaker system 70. The shaker system has an outlet which is connected to the mud reservoir 34.
The diverter valve 66 has a valve member which is movable between a first position in which the valve inlet 66a is connected to the first outlet 66b and a second position in which the valve inlet 66a is connected to the second outlet 66c. The diverter valve 66 is configured such that fluid can always flow from the inlet 66a to one of the outlets 66b, 66c, i.e. the valve 66 can never be closed. The diverter valve 66 is provided with an electrical actuator, which may be operated remotely, for example via the central drilling control unit.
In normal use, the valve 66 is left in the first position, so that the returned drilling fluid (mud, cuttings and any other well bore fluids) passes through the mud gas separator 68 and the shaker system 70 before returning to the mud reservoir 34. The valve 66 may, however, be operated to move the valve member to the second position, to divert returning drilling fluid directly to the shaker system, for example if a large amount of debris is expected as a result of drilling out a casing shoe float system.
The disclosed drilling system can be used for managed pressure drilling with hydrostatically underbalanced drilling fluid weight and a dynamically overbalanced bottom hole pressure, for example where there is concern that the bottom hole pressure might exceed the fracture gradient of the formation 11 because the fracture gradient is unknown or there is a risk of crossing over a fault line or into another zone or lithology. When the system is used in such a way, the density of mud is selected such that the mud weight provides a static pressure which is lower than the pressure of fluid in the formation 11 (the formation pressure), and the bottom hole pressure is increased by the frictional effects of circulating mud during drilling and the operation of one of the back pressure control valves 30a, 30b to restrict fluid flow along the annulus return line 28 and therefore to induce a back pressure on the annulus 16, so that the bottom hole pressure is always higher than the formation pressure and no formation fluids are allowed into the borehole 10, at least during drilling.
This drilling system can also be used for managed pressure drilling with a hydrostatically overbalanced drilling fluid weight. When the system is used in this way, the mud density is selected such that the mud weight provides a static pressure which is greater than the formation pressure. Thus, the well is overbalanced and the bottom hole pressure is always higher than the formation even when drilling is not in progress.
Finally, this system can be used for pressurised mud cap drilling in which a heavy density mud cap is circulated into the top portion of the borehole and a lighter density fluid, usually sea water, is circulated in to the well bore below the mud cap. The back pressure system 36 is used to maintain the bottom hole pressure above the fracture gradient of the formation 11 so that the lighter density fluid is injected into the formation and the formation fluids are completely contained in the formation whilst drilling is in progress.
When used in this specification and claims, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” and variations thereof mean that the specified features, steps or integers are included. The terms are not to be interpreted to exclude the presence of other features, steps or components.
The features disclosed in the foregoing description, or the following claims, or the accompanying drawings, expressed in their specific forms or in terms of a means for performing the disclosed function, or a method or process for attaining the disclosed result, as appropriate, may, separately, or in any combination of such features, be utilised for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1015408.6 | Sep 2010 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/065834 | 9/13/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/28/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/035001 | 3/22/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3338319 | Griffin | Aug 1967 | A |
3563511 | Bentley-Leek | Feb 1971 | A |
4953618 | Hamid | Sep 1990 | A |
6263981 | Gonzalez | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6413297 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7603916 | Gysling | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8061186 | Gysling | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20040065477 | Paulk et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060162792 | Oh | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070151762 | Reitsma | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070151763 | Reitsma et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070246263 | Reitsma | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100305882 | Gysling | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
85100330 | Jan 1987 | CN |
1513110 | Jul 2004 | CN |
0022644 | Jan 1981 | EP |
2075403 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2000003144 | Jan 2000 | WO |
03071091 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2005017308 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2007034152 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008051978 | May 2008 | WO |
2010115834 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011058031 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report (GB1015408.6), dated Dec. 20, 2010. |
PCT Int'l Search Report (PCT/EP2011/065834), dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, First Notification of Office Action for 201180044432.7, dated Apr. 3, 2015; Applicant or Patentee: Managed Pressure Operations Pte Ltd.; Title of Invention: “Managed Pressure Drilling Apparatus”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130299240 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |