This application is a U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/NO2015/050211, filed on Nov. 12, 2015 and which claims benefit to Norwegian Patent Application No. 20141553, filed on Dec. 22, 2014. The International Application was published in English on Jun. 30, 2016 as WO 2016/105205 A1 under PCT Article 21(2).
The present invention relates to a protection system for a marine drilling riser. More specifically, the present invention relates to a system which protects the riser from overpressure in case of gas hydrates formed either in the wellbore, wellhead, subsea BOP or in the drilling riser annulus, agglomerates and adhere between the drill pipe and drilling riser main bore wall plugging the entire drilling riser annulus. The system will also protect the riser from overpressure if all outlets from the riser are restricted, plugged or blocked with hydrates or other substances or for some other reasons.
As the oil and gas industry are going to deeper water inadvertent gas entry into the drilling riser is a challenge due to that the high static pressure at the seabed causes the gas to be highly compressed and in dense phase. Another challenge is that due to the static high pressure and low seawater temperature any gases that may enter the wellhead, subsea BOP, riser annulus and K&C (kill and choke) lines may form hydrates. Hydrates can form if gas and water are both present and the pressure is relative high and temperature relative low. Hydrates have a strong tendency to agglomerate and to adhere to the pipe wall and thereby plug the pipe or riser annulus.
There are known several case stories on how hydrates have caused problems during deep water drilling and well control operations. In 1989 an SPE paper was published with two case stories with formation of hydrates during deep water drilling operations.
SPE paper 16130-PA; Formation of Hydrates During Deepwater Drilling Operations. Authors: J. W. Barker, SPE and R. K. Gomez, SPE, Exxon Co. U.S.A. Journal of Petroleum Technology, March 1989.
Case 1. US west coast 1,150 ft (350 m) water depth, temp. 45° F. (7° C.) at mudline.
Case 2. Gulf of Mexico 3,100 ft (945 m) water depth, temp. 40° F. (4° C.) at mudline.
Barker and Gomez have stated in 1989 based on the two cases above that; “Formation of natural gas hydrates during deepwater well-control operations can have several such adverse effects as:
Although the challenge with hydrates during drilling and well control operations has been known for many years, several cases with hydrates causing problems have also been reported after 1989.
A potential plug in the riser annulus is dangerous because if the BOP is closed in and the booster pump is used to circulate out the gas hydrates from the riser, the applied pressure from the booster pump may burst the drilling riser. It is also dangerous if liberated gas from above the plug may displace the liquid mud above and create a chain reaction creating a large differential pressure across the plug. If the hydrate plug for some reason then becomes loose it may accelerate up the riser fast and potentially plug all riser outlets as a secondary effect. An accelerating hydrate plug up the riser annulus may also release large amount of gas, increasing the pressure in the riser. This may then create an overpressure that may burst the slip joint or flow hoses in the upper part of the riser (in case of managed pressure drilling technics are used), resulting in a large gas release in the moon pool area.
An aspect of the present invention is to prevent a hazardous event occurring from a “Plug formation around the drillstring in the riser”.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a system which protects the riser from overpressure in case of outlets from the riser is/are plugged with hydrates or blocked for some other reason.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a system which is adaptable on new and existing installations and which requires as few modifications as possible.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a protection system for a drilling riser. The drilling riser includes a main drilling riser bore and a drilling riser annulus and is configured to extend from a floating installation to a location on a seafloor and to be fluidly connected to a subsea BOP. The system includes a fluid conduit configured to extend from the floating installation to a lower region of the drilling riser. The fluid conduit is fluidly connected with the drilling riser annulus in the drilling riser. The fluid conduit is configured to provide at least one of a rapid pressure relief and a fluid bypass for the main drilling riser bore to prevent the drilling riser from an uncontrolled pressure build-up due to an inadvertent plugging or a restriction resulting in a maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of the drilling riser being exceeded, if a restriction, a plug or a blockage exists in the drilling riser annulus or in riser outlets.
The present invention is described in greater detail below on the basis of embodiments and of the drawings in which:
To protect the riser from overpressure, a fluid conduit is used as a secondary pressure protection system. The system should be a fully automated High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS), since there is normally not enough time for manual intervention and operating procedures.
Throughout the disclosure, the term “riser” and “drilling riser” have been used, the terms meaning the same, but even though the present invention is described in relation to a drilling operation, it should be understood that the present invention is applicable for other riser systems than just drilling risers, including completion systems (completion riser) and production systems (production riser).
The present invention relates to a protection system for a drilling riser provided with a main bore, where the drilling riser is arranged to extend between a floating installation and a blow out preventer (BOP) arranged on a seafloor, where the drilling riser is being fluidly connected to the BOP. The protection system further comprises a fluid conduit extending from the floating installation and to a lower region of the drilling riser, where the fluid conduit is being fluidly connected to an annulus provided in the drilling riser. The fluid conduit is used for rapid pressure relief and/or to bypass the main bore of the drilling riser in order to prevent the drilling riser from uncontrolled pressure build-up across an inadvertent plugging or restriction or in order to prevent a maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of the drilling riser to be exceeded, in the event the riser annulus or riser outlets is/are restricted, plugged or blocked.
In an aspect, for preventing hydrate plugging of the riser outlet, blow out preventer (BOP) or the choke and kill lines, there may be arranged at least one additional fluid line extending from a surface location to a lower region of the riser, which at least one additional fluid line may be connectable to the annulus of the riser and serves as a standby line being at least partly filled with a hydrate inhibitor. The degree of filling of the hydrate inhibitor fluid may vary from a small amount to filling up the whole additional fluid line. The hydrate inhibitor fluid is typically MEG (Monoethylene glycol) or other suitable inhibitor. By having the additional fluid line permanently filled with the hydrate inhibitor, provides for the opportunity of instant chemical injection in case of a gas kick. This option, in addition to circulating excess pressure (e.g. gas) gas out of the booster line at the same time, provides an effective system and method of handling/minimizing hydrate formation.
In an embodiment, the protection system may comprise facilities for displacing the hydrate inhibitor in the additional fluid line with seawater in a reversed way back to a topside storage facility if/when the well is completed or if the riser for some reason has to be pulled. This is done to prevent spilling hydrate inhibitor fluid on the topside facility.
A normal operation of the system according to the present invention may include:
These and other characteristics of the present invention will be clear from the following description of an embodiment, given as a non-restrictive example, with reference to the attached drawings wherein:
In a well control event followed by gas inadvertently entering the riser 8, the inadvertent gas in the riser 8 may expand rapidly as the gas is circulated and migrating up the riser annulus 7. In such an emergency situation the gas and riser fluids can be diverted safely to port or starboard (leeward side) overboard lines by opening diverter valve(s) 16, closing the diverter element 12 and flow line valve 14. This divert overboard sequence is actuated manually but the sequence of operation is automated and interlocked to provide that the diverter valve 16 is open before the diverter element 12 closes around the drill string 2. Any hydrocarbon gas or influx that are trapped below a subsea blow out preventer (BOP) annular 17 or a subsea BOP ram 18, can be circulated out by pumping kill fluid down the drill string 2 and up through either a choke line 19 or the a kill line 20 to a kill & choke manifold 21 and to a mud gas separator 22, where the gas can be vented through a vent line 23 and the liquid can return through a liquid seal 24, back to the mud system.
One challenge with inadvertent hydrocarbon gas in the riser 8 is that it may react with the water in the drilling fluid and form hydrates. A booster pump 26 is normally used to circulate drilling fluid down a booster line 27 in order to circulate the hydrates out from the riser annulus 7. A potential hydrate plug 25 in the riser annulus is dangerous because if the BOP 18 is closed in, the applied pressure from the booster pump 26 may burst the drilling riser 8, since the ordinary safety relief valve 28 is set to protect the booster line 27. Typically set point for safety relief valve 28 will be 5000 psi or whatever is the max allowable working pressure for the booster line 27. In deep water and with high booster pump 26 flow rate, the frictional pressure drop in the booster line 27 can be as high as 4000 to 5000 psi. If the riser annulus or the outlets of the riser 8 are blocked for some reason, 5000 psi applied surface pressure may burst the riser 8, especially if the riser 8 in addition is filled with drilling fluid with higher density than the outside seawater.
It is also dangerous if liberated gas from the top of the hydrate plug 25 displace the liquid mud above and create a chain reaction creating a large differential pressure across the hydrate plug 25. If the hydrate plug 25 for some reason then become loose, it may accelerate up the riser annulus 7 fast and potentially plug the diverter housing 13 and all riser outlets as a secondary effect. A large hydrate plug 25 in the diverter housing 13 will be very dangerous because the liberated gas from the hydrate plug 25 will increase the pressure in the riser 8 and potentially burst the primary and secondary slip joint packers 10, 11, resulting in a large gas release in the moon pool area (not shown).
An aspect of the present invention is therefore to provide a system which protects the riser 8 and slip joint 9 from overpressure which may result in a riser 8 or slip joint 9 burst due to the release of entrapped gas during melting of hydrates, which is a risk with the prior art according to
While typically the booster line is used to relive pressure or by-pass fluids in case of a blockage or restriction of the riser annulus, the best solution will be to avoid hydrates forming. The kill line 20 should therefore be filled with hydrate inhibitor, typically some kind of glycol, and the inside volume of the kill line will then act as additional storage volume when hydrate is not being injected. In a well control event hydrate inhibitor can then immediately and effectively be injected into the subsea wellhead and BOP stack to prevent hydrates to form in the subsea BOP. Hydrate inhibitor can also be injected through the kill line 20, during conventional circulation of a kick, up the choke line 19 to prevent the choke line 19 being plugged by hydrates. Another feature of an embodiment of the present invention is therefore to utilize the kill line 20 for injecting hydrate inhibitor also into the riser annulus 7 by introducing a new line and isolation valve 56, in the event the upper BOP annular 17 is closed in a well control event and gas inadvertently has entered the riser 8.
In principle the present invention works in the same way as described in the detail description of
Another advantage with MPD and RGH is that the ASBP can rapidly be manipulated and this will instantly also change the pressure in the riser annulus 7. When a riser booster pump 26 is used to circulate gas up and out of the riser annulus 7, the pump rate and the ASBP can be used in combination or separately to control how rapid the gas will expand during the process of RGH. The same technic can be used in riser hydrate handling (RHH). When the hydrates are circulated up the riser annulus 7, they will not expand at all until the hydrates gets to a region in the riser 8 where the pressure is low enough and the temperature is high enough allowing the hydrates to dissociate or melt. Depending on the amount of hydrates and speed they dissociate a very rapid gas expansion may occur. Pump rate and ASBP controls the speed of hydrate dissociation and gas expansion. When hydrates melt and gas expand this is and endothermic process, which means that the melting process absorbs heat or cool down the surrounding. If the circulation is stopped at the region in the riser where hydrates start to dissociate or melt, the hydrates may agglomerate and adhere to the drillstring 2 as the drillstring 2 typically will be cooled down due to the endothermic melting process. The risk of partially or completely plug the riser annulus 7 will increase. If the riser annulus 7 plugs up with hydrates 25 there will be a risk of trapped gas from the melting process will build up a pressure below the hydrate plug 25 and released gas above the plug will be vented out through the pressure control valve 63 and the mud gas separator 22, creating a large differential pressure across the hydrate plug 25. In order to dissociate or melt a hydrate plug 25 it is important that the pressure is lowered in a controlled manner on each side of the hydrate plug. This can be achieved by installing an equalising line 65 between the booster pump 26 discharge line and the mud return line, to apply the same ASBP 64 on both side of the plug. The equalising line 65 needs to be fitted with one or two isolation valves 66 which will normally be closed during normal MPD or RGH operations. In this way the pressure on both sides of the hydrate plug 25 can be regulated by one common pressure control valve 63 and if this valve fails, plug or capacity exceeded, the PLC controlled safety valve 50 can act as a secondary protection against overpressure of the riser 8. The PLC controlled safety valve 50 will also protect the riser from overpressure if the equalising line 65 and isolation valves 66 are open two late or not open resulting in pressure building up below the hydrate plug 25.
The same type of drilling riser protection system as described in
The present invention has been described in non-limiting embodiments. It is clear that the person skilled in the art may make a number of alterations and modifications to the described embodiments without diverging from the scope of the present invention as defined in the attached claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20141553 | Dec 2014 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2015/050211 | 11/12/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/105205 | 6/30/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6470975 | Bourgoyne | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7331393 | Hoel | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7637326 | Bolding | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7770653 | Hill | Aug 2010 | B2 |
9759025 | Vavik | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9828847 | Vavik | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20080105434 | Orbell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20110100710 | Fossli | May 2011 | A1 |
20120227978 | Fossli | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20150068758 | Leuchtenberg et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20170122046 | Vavik | May 2017 | A1 |
20170138170 | Vavik | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2009123476 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2013153135 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2013153135 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
J. Dewar et al.: “Procedures control total mud losses while drilling in deep water”, Oil & Gas Journal, vol. 91, No. 44, pp. 67-69, 72-73 (1993). |
J. W. Barker et al.: “Formation of Hydrates During Deepwater Drilling Operations”, Journal of Petroleum Technology, SPE paper 16130-PA, pp. 297-301 (1989). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170350213 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |