1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to oilfield wellbore drilling systems and more particularly to subsea drilling systems that control bottom hole pressure or equivalent circulating density during drilling of the wellbores.
2. Background of the Art
Oilfield wellbores are drilled by rotating a drill bit conveyed into the wellbore by a drill string. The drill string includes a drilling assembly (also referred to as the “bottom hole assembly” or “BHA”) that carries the drill bit. The BHA is conveyed into the wellbore by a tubing. Coiled tubing or jointed tubing is utilized to convey the drilling assembly into the wellbore. The drilling assembly sometimes includes a drilling motor or a “mud motor” that rotates the drill bit. The drilling assembly also includes a variety of sensors for taking measurements of a variety of drilling, formation and BHA parameters. A suitable drilling fluid (commonly referred to as the “mud”) is supplied or pumped from the surface down the tubing. The drilling fluid drives the mud motor and then it discharges at the bottom of the drill bit. The drilling fluid returns uphole via the annulus between the drill string and the wellbore and carries with it pieces of formation (commonly referred to as the “cuttings”) cut or produced by the drill bit in drilling the wellbore.
For drilling wellbores under water (referred to in the industry as “offshore” or “subsea” drilling) tubing is provided at the surface work station (located on a vessel or platform). One or more tubing injectors or rigs are used to move the tubing into and out of the wellbore. In sub-sea riser-type drilling, a riser, which is formed by joining sections of casing or pipe, is deployed between the drilling vessel and the wellhead equipment at the sea bottom and is utilized to guide the tubing to the wellhead. The riser also serves as a conduit for fluid returning from the wellhead to the vessel at sea surface.
During drilling, the drilling operator attempts to carefully control the fluid density at the surface so as to prevent an overburdened condition in the wellbore. In other words, the operator maintains the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling fluid in the wellbore above the formation or pore pressure to avoid well blow-out. The density of the drilling fluid and the fluid flow rate largely determine the effectiveness of the drilling fluid to carry the cuttings to the surface. One important downhole parameter during drilling is the bottomhole pressure, which is effectively the equivalent circulating density (“ECD”) of the fluid at the wellbore bottom.
This term, ECD, describes the condition that exists when the drilling mud in the well is circulated. ECD is the friction pressure caused by the fluid circulating through the annulus of the open hole and the casing(s) on its way back to the surface. This causes an increase in the pressure profile along this path that is different from the pressure profile when the well is in a static condition (i.e., not circulating). In addition to the increase in pressure while circulating, there is an additional increase in pressure while drilling due to the introduction of drill solids into the fluid. This pressure increase along the annulus of the well can negatively impact drilling operations by fracturing the formation at the shoe of the last casing. This can reduce the amount of hole that can be drilled before having to set an additional casing. In addition, the rate of circulation that can be achieved is also limited. Due to this circulating pressure increase, the ability to clean the hole is severely restricted. This condition is exacerbated when drilling an offshore well. In offshore wells, the difference between the fracture pressures in the shallow sections of the well and the pore pressures of the deeper sections is considerably smaller compared to on-shore wellbores. This is due to the seawater gradient versus the gradient that would exist if there were soil overburden for the same depth.
In order to be able to drill a well of this type to a total wellbore depth at a subsea location, the bottom hole ECD must be reduced or controlled. One approach to do so is to use a mud filled riser to form a subsea fluid circulation system utilizing the tubing, BHA, the annulus between the tubing and the wellbore and the mud filled riser, and then inject gas (or some other low density liquid) in the primary drilling fluid (typically in the annulus adjacent the BHA) to reduce the density of fluid downstream (i.e., in the remainder of the fluid circulation system). This so-called “dual density” approach is often referred to as drilling with compressible fluids.
Another method for changing the density gradient in a deepwater return fluid path has been proposed. This approach proposes to use a tank, such as an elastic bag, at the sea floor for receiving return fluid from the wellbore annulus and holding it at the hydrostatic pressure of the water at the sea floor. Independent of the flow in the annulus, a separate return line connected to the sea floor storage tank and a subsea lifting pump delivers the return fluid to the surface. Although this technique (which is referred to as “dual gradient” drilling) would use a single fluid, it would also require a discontinuity in the hydraulic gradient line between the sea floor storage tank and the subsea lifting pump. This requires close monitoring and control of the pressure at the subsea storage tank, subsea hydrostatic water pressure, subsea lifting pump operation and the surface pump delivering drilling fluids under pressure into the tubing for flow downhole. The level of complexity of the required subsea instrumentation and controls as well as the difficulty of deployment of the system has delayed the commercial application of the “dual gradient” system.
Another approach is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/353,275, filed on Jul. 14, 1999 and assigned to the assignee of the present application. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/353,275 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. One embodiment of this application describes a riserless system wherein a centrifugal pump in a separate return line controls the fluid flow to the surface and thus the equivalent circulating density.
The present invention provides a wellbore system wherein equivalent circulating density is controlled by controllably bypassing the returning fluid about a restriction in the returning fluid path of a riser utilizing an active differential pressure device, such as a centrifugal pump or turbine, located adjacent to the riser. The fluid is then returned into the riser above the restriction. The present invention also provides a dual gradient subsea drilling system wherein equivalent circulating density is controlled by controllably bypassing the returning fluid about a restriction in a riser by utilizing an active differential pressure device, such as a centrifugal pump or turbine located some distance above the sea bed. The present systems are relatively easy to incorporate in new and existing systems.
The present invention provides wellbore systems for performing subsea downhole wellbore operations, such as subsea drilling as described more fully hereinafter. Such drilling systems include a rig at the sea level that moves a drill string into and out of the wellbore. A bottom hole assembly, carrying the drill bit, is attached to the bottom end of the tubing. A wellhead assembly or equipment at the sea bottom receives the bottom hole assembly and the tubing. A drilling fluid system supplies a drilling fluid into a fluid circuit that supports wellbore operations. In one embodiment, the fluid circuit includes a supply conduit and a return conduit. The supply conduit includes a tubing string that receives drilling fluid from the fluid system. This fluid is discharged at the drill bit and returns to the wellhead equipment carrying the drill cuttings. The return conduit includes a riser dispersed between the wellhead equipment and the surface that guides the drill string and provides a conduit for moving the returning fluid to the surface.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a flow restriction device in the riser restricts the flow of the returning fluid through the riser. Preferably, the flow restriction device moves between a substantially open bore and closed bore positions and accommodates the axial sliding and rotation movement of the drill string. In one embodiment, radial bearings stabilize the drill string while a hydraulically actuated packer assembly provides selective obstruction of the riser bore and therefore selectively diverts return fluid flow into a flow diverter line provided below the flow restriction device. Additionally, a seal such as a rotary seal is used to further restrict flow of return fluid through the flow restriction device. A fluid flow device, such as a centrifugal pump or turbine in the flow diverter line causes a pressure differential in the returning fluid as it flows from just below the flow restriction device to above the flow restriction device. The pump speed is controlled, by controlling the energy input to the pump. One or more pressure sensors provide pressure measurement of the circulating fluid. A controller controls the operation of the pump to control the amount of the differential pressure across the pump and thus the equivalent circulating density. The controller maintains the equivalent circulating density at a predetermined level or within a predetermined range in response to programmed instructions provided to the controller. The pump is mounted on the outside of the riser joint, typically at a sufficient depth below the sea level to provide enough lift to offset the desired amount of ECD. Alternatively, the flow restriction device and the pump may be disposed in the return fluid path in the annulus between the wellbore and the drill string. The present system is equally useful as an at-balance or an underbalanced drilling system.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a flow restriction device in the riser restricts the flow of the returning fluid through the riser. A flow diverter line, active pressure differential device (“APD Device”) and a separate return line provide a fluid flow path around the flow restriction device. In this embodiment, dual gradient drilling with active control of wellbore pressure is achieved mid riser or at a selected point in the riser, the selected point between the surface and sea bottom. The active pressure differential device, such as centrifugal pumps or turbines, moves the returning fluid from just below the flow restriction device to the surface via the separate return line. The operation of the active pressure differential device is controlled to create a differential pressure across the device, thereby reducing the bottomhole pressure. The pumps or turbines speeds are controlled, by controlling the energy input to the pumps or turbines. One or more pressure sensors provide pressure measurements of the circulating fluid. A controller controls the operation of the pumps or turbines to control the amount of the pressure differential and thus the equivalent circulating density. The controller maintains the bottom hole pressure and the equivalent circulating density at a predetermined level or within a predetermined range in response to programmed instructions provided to the controller. The pumps or turbines are mounted on the outside of the riser, typically between 1000 to 3000 ft. below sea level, but above the sea bed. The present system is equally useful in maintaining the bottomhole pressure at an at-balance or under-balance condition.
Examples of the more important features of the invention have been summarized (albeit rather broadly) in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood and in order that the contributions they represent to the art may be appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the invention that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject of the claims appended hereto.
For detailed understanding of the present invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing:
The subsea wellbore 90 is drilled by a drill bit 130 carried by a drill string 120, which includes a drilling assembly or a bottom hole assembly (“BHA”) 135 at the bottom of a suitable tubing 121, which may be a coiled tubing or a jointed pipe. The tubing 121 is placed at the drilling platform 101. To drill the wellbore 90, the BHA 135 is conveyed from the vessel 101 to the wellhead equipment 125 and then inserted into the wellbore 90. The tubing 121 is moved to the wellhead equipment 125 and then moved into and out of the wellbore 90 by a suitable tubing injection system.
To drill the wellbore 90, a drilling fluid 20 from a surface drilling fluid system or mud system 22 is directed into a fluid circuit that services the wellbore 90. This fluid can be pressurized or use primarily gravity assisted flow. In one embodiment, the mud system 22 includes a mud pit or supply source 26 and one or more pumps 28 in fluid communication with a supply conduit of the fluid circuit. The fluid is pumped down the supply conduit, which includes the tubing 121. The drilling fluid 20 may operate a mud motor in the BHA 135, which in turn rotates the drill bit 130. The drill bit 130 breaks or cuts the formation (rock) into cuttings 147. The drilling fluid 142 leaving the drill bit travels uphole through a return conduit of the fluid circuit. In one embodiment, the return conduit includes the annulus 122 between the drill string 120 and the wellbore wall 126 carrying the drill cuttings 147. The return circuit also includes a riser 160 between the wellhead 125 and the surface 101 that carries the returning fluid 142 from the wellbore 90 to the sea level. The returning fluid 142 discharges into a separator 24, which separates the cuttings 147 and other solids from the returning fluid 142 and discharges the clean fluid into the mud pit 26. The tubing 121 passes through the mud-filled riser 160. As shown in
As noted above, the present invention provides a drilling system for controlling wellbore pressure and controlling or reducing the ECD effect during drilling fluid circulation or drilling of subsea wellbores. To achieve the desired control of the ECD, the present invention selectively adjusts the pressure gradient of the fluid circulation system. One embodiment of the present invention utilizes an arrangement wherein the flow of return fluid is controlled (e.g., assisted) at a predetermined elevation along the riser 160. An exemplary arrangement of such an embodiment includes a flow restriction device 164 in the drilling riser 160 and an actively controlled fluid lifting device 170.
Referring now to
The flow restriction device 164 may be adjustable from a surface location via a control line 165, which allows the control over the pressure differential through the riser. The depth at which the flow restriction device 164 is installed will depend upon the maximum desired reduction in the ECD. A depth of between 1000 ft to 3000 ft. is considered adequate for most subsea applications. The returning fluid 142 in the riser 160 is diverted about the restriction device 164 by a fluid lifting device, such as centrifugal pump 170 coupled to a flow cross line or a diverter line 171. The diverter line 171 is installed from a location below the flow restriction device 164 to a location above the flow restriction device 164. Thus, the lifting device 170 diverts the returning fluid in the riser from below the flow restriction device to above the flow restriction device 164. The fluid lifting device 170 is mounted on the exterior of the riser 160. To control the ECD at a desired value, the pump speed (RPM) is controlled. Typically, the energy input to (and thus the RPM of) the pump 170 is increased as the fluid flow in the circulating path is increased and/or the length of the circulating path increases with advancement of the drill bit. Moreover, the energy input to (and thus the RPM of) the lifting device is decreased as the return flow in the well 90 (
Referring now to
Referring now to
During drilling, the controller 180 receives the pressure information from one or more of the sensors (P1-Pn) and/or information from other sensors (S1-S7) in the system 100. The controller 180 determines the ECD and adjusts the energy input to the lifting device 170 to maintain the ECD at a desired or predetermined value or within a desired or predetermined range. The controller 180 includes a microprocessor or a computer, peripherals 184 and programs which are capable of making online decisions regarding the control of the flow restriction device 164 and the energy input to the lifting device 170. A speed sensor S2 may be used to determine the pump speed. Thus, the location of the flow restriction device 164 and the pressure differential about the restriction device controls the ECD. The wellbore system 100 thus provides a closed loop system for controlling the ECD by controllably diverting the returning fluid about a flow restriction device in the returning fluid path in response to one or more parameters of interest during drilling of a wellbore. This system is relatively simple and efficient and can be incorporated into new or existing drilling systems.
Referring now to
Referring now to
To achieve the desired reduction and/or control of the bottomhole pressure or ECD, the system 200 utilizes a flow restriction device 164 and active pressure differential device 202 in much the same manner as that described in reference to system 100 (
Referring now to
Like the wellbore system 100 of
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred embodiments of the invention, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
This application takes priority from Provisional U.S. Patent Applications Ser. Nos. 60/303,959 and 60/304,160, filed on Jul. 9, 2001 and Jul. 10, 2001 respectively, and Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/323,797, filed on Sep. 20, 2001. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/094,208, filed Mar. 8, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,848,081 granted on Nov. 18, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/353,275, filed Jul. 14, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,415,877, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/108,601, filed Nov. 16, 1998, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/101,541, filed Sep. 23, 1998, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/092,908, filed, Jul. 15, 1998 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/095,188, filed Aug. 3, 1998.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2812723 | Coberly | Nov 1957 | A |
2946565 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
3595075 | Dower | Jul 1971 | A |
3603409 | Watkins | Sep 1971 | A |
3677353 | Baker | Jul 1972 | A |
3815673 | Bruce et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3958651 | Young | May 1976 | A |
4022285 | Frank | May 1977 | A |
4046191 | Neath | Sep 1977 | A |
4049066 | Richey | Sep 1977 | A |
4063602 | Howell et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4091881 | Maus | May 1978 | A |
4099583 | Maus | Jul 1978 | A |
4108257 | Sizer | Aug 1978 | A |
4134461 | Blomsma | Jan 1979 | A |
4137975 | Pennock | Feb 1979 | A |
4149603 | Arnold | Apr 1979 | A |
4210208 | Shanks | Jul 1980 | A |
4223747 | Marais | Sep 1980 | A |
4240513 | Castel et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4291772 | Beynet | Sep 1981 | A |
4368787 | Messenger | Jan 1983 | A |
4436166 | Hayatdavoudi et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4440239 | Evans | Apr 1984 | A |
4534426 | Hooper | Aug 1985 | A |
4577700 | Dellinger et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4613003 | Ruhle | Sep 1986 | A |
4630691 | Hooper | Dec 1986 | A |
4744426 | Reed | May 1988 | A |
4813495 | Leach | Mar 1989 | A |
5150757 | Nunley | Sep 1992 | A |
5168932 | Worrall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5355967 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5651420 | Tibbitts et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5775443 | Lott | Jul 1998 | A |
5848656 | M.o slashed.ksvold | Dec 1998 | A |
6062313 | Moore | May 2000 | A |
6068053 | Shaw | May 2000 | A |
6102673 | Mott et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142236 | Brammer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6216799 | Gonzalez | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6276455 | Gonzalez | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328107 | Maus | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6374925 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415877 | Fincher et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457529 | Calder et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6527513 | Van Drentham-Susman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530437 | Maurer et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6648081 | Fincher et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651745 | Lush et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6719071 | Moyes | Apr 2004 | B1 |
20030146001 | Hosie et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0214649 | Feb 2002 | CA |
0290250 | Sep 1988 | EP |
WO 0050731 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 03023182 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030066650 A1 | Apr 2003 | US | |
20060065402 A9 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60323797 | Sep 2001 | US | |
60304160 | Jul 2001 | US | |
60303959 | Jul 2001 | US | |
60108601 | Nov 1998 | US | |
60101541 | Sep 1998 | US | |
60095188 | Aug 1998 | US | |
60092908 | Jul 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09353275 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 10094208 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10094208 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10191152 | US |