The present invention relates to a drilling system and method for drilling a bore hole into an earth formation.
The exploration and production of hydrocarbons from subsurface formations ultimately requires a method to reach for and extract the hydrocarbons from the formation. This is typically achieved by drilling a well with a drilling rig. In its simplest form, this constitutes a land-based drilling rig that is used to support and rotate a drill string, comprised of a series of drill tubulars with a drill bit mounted at the end. Furthermore, a pumping system is used to circulate a fluid, comprised of a base fluid, typically water or oil, and various additives down the drill string, the fluid then exits through the rotating drill bit and flows back to surface via the annular space formed between the borehole wall and the drill string. The drilling fluid serves the following purposes: (a) provide support to the borehole wall, (b) prevent or, in case of under balanced drilling (UBD), control formation fluids or gasses from entering the well, (c) transport the cuttings produced by the drill bit to surface, (d) provide hydraulic power to tools fixed in the drill string and (e) cooling of the bit. After being circulated through the well, the drilling fluid flows back into a mud handling system, generally comprised of a shaker table, to remove solids, a mud pit and a manual or automatic means for addition of various chemicals or additives to keep the properties of the returned fluid as required for the drilling operation. Once the fluid has been treated, it is circulated back into the well via re-injection into the top of the drill string with the pumping system.
During drilling operations, the drilling fluid exerts a pressure against the well bore inside wall that is mainly built-up of a hydrostatic part, related to the weight of the mud column, and a dynamic part related frictional pressure losses caused by, for instance, the fluid circulation rate or movement of the drill string.
The fluid pressure in the well is selected such that, while the fluid is static or circulated during drilling operations, it does not exceed the formation fracture pressure or formation strength. If the formation strength is exceeded, formation fractures will occur which will create drilling problems such as fluid losses and borehole instability. On the other hand, in overbalanced drilling the fluid density is chosen such that the pressure in the well is always maintained above the pore pressure to avoid formation fluids entering the well, while during UBD the pressure in the well is maintained just below the power pressure to controllably allow formation fluids entering the well (primary well control).
The pressure margin with on one side the pore pressure and on the other side the formation strength is known as the “Operational Window”.
For reasons of safety and pressure control, a Blow-Out Preventer (BOP) can be mounted on the well head, below the rig floor, which BOP can shut off the wellbore in case formation fluids or gas should enter the wellbore (secondary well control) in an unwanted or uncontrolled way. Such unwanted inflows are commonly referred to as “kicks”. The BOP will normally only be used in emergency i.e. well-control situations.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,952, to Bradfield et al. and assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated, a closed well bore system is used for the purposes of underbalanced drilling, i.e., the annular pressure is maintained below the formation pore pressure.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,129 (Shell Oil Company) a method and system are described to control the fluid pressure in a well bore during drilling, using a back pressure pump in fluid communication with an annulus discharge conduit, in addition to a primary pump for circulating drilling fluid through the annulus via the drill string.
An accurate control of the fluid pressure in the well bore is facilitated by an accurate knowledge of the down hole pressure. However, in a borehole with a variably rotating drill string, and with possibly all kinds of down hole subs that are driven by the drilling fluid circulation flow, it is a problem to monitor the down hole pressure in real time. Measurements of the pressure of the drilling fluid in the drill string, or in the bore hole, close to the surface level are often too far removed from the lower end of the bore hole to provide an accurate basis for calculating or estimating the actual down hole pressure. On the other hand, the currently available data transfer rates are too low for using direct down hole pressure data taken by a measurement while drilling sensor as a real-time feed back control signal.
It is thus an object of the invention to provide a system and a method for drilling a bore hole into an earth formation that allows for improved control of the fluid pressure in the well bore.
According to the invention, there is provided a drilling system for drilling a bore hole into an earth formation, the bore hole having an inside wall, and the system comprising:
The invention also provides a drilling method for drilling a bore hole into an earth formation, the bore hole having an inside wall, the drilling method comprising the steps of:
The invention will now be illustrated by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawing wherein
In these figures, like parts carry identical reference numerals.
The drilling system 100 is shown as being comprised of a drilling rig 102 that is used to support drilling operations. Many of the components used on a rig 102, such as the kelly, power tongs, slips, draw works and other equipment are not shown for ease of depiction. The rig 102 is used to support drilling and exploration operations in a formation 104. A borehole 106 has already been partially drilled.
A drill string 112 reaches into the bore bole 106, thereby forming a well bore annulus between the bore hole wall and the drill string 112, and/or between an optional casing 101 and the drill string 112. One of the functions of the drill string 112 is to convey a drilling fluid 150, the use of which is required in a drilling operation, to the bottom of the bore hole and into the well bore annulus.
The drill string 112 supports a bottom hole assembly (BHA) 113 that includes a drill bit 120, a mud motor 118, a sensor package 119, a check valve (not shown) to prevent backflow of drilling fluid from the well bore annulus into the drill string.
The sensor package 119 may for instance be provided in the form of a MWD/LWD sensor suite. In particular it may include a pressure transducer 116 to determine the annular pressure of drilling fluid in or near the bottom of the hole.
The BHA 113 in the shown embodiment also includes a telemetry package 122 that can be used to transmit pressure information, MWD/LWD information as well as drilling information to be received at the surface. A data memory including a pressure data memory may be provided for temporary storage of collected pressure data before transmittal of the information.
The drilling fluid 150 may be stored in a reservoir 136, which in
During operation, the drilling fluid 150 is pumped down through the drill string 112 and the BHA 113 and exits the drill bit 120, where it circulates the cuttings away from the bit 120 and returns them up a drilling fluid return passage 115 which is typically formed by the well bore annulus. The drilling fluid 150 returns to the surface and goes through a side outlet, through drilling fluid discharge conduit 124 and optionally through various surge tanks and telemetry systems (not shown).
Referred is now also to
A variable flow-restricting device, such as an injection choke or an injection valve, is optionally provided to separate the injection fluid supply passage 141 from the drilling fluid return passage 115. Herewith it is achieved that injection of the injection fluid into the drilling fluid can be interrupted while maintaining pressurisation of the injection fluid supply passage.
Suitably, the injection fluid has a lower density than the drilling fluid, such that the hydrostatic pressure in the bottom hole area, in the vicinity of the drill bit 120, is reduced due to a lower weight of the body of fluid present in the fluid return passage 115.
Suitably, the injection fluid is injected in the form of a gas, which can be, for example, nitrogen gas. An injection fluid pressure sensor 156 is provided, in fluid communication with the injection fluid supply passage, for monitoring a pressure of the injection fluid in the injection fluid supply passage 144. The injection fluid supply passage 141 is led to the surface level on the rig, so that the injection fluid pressure sensor 156 can be located at the surface level and the pressure data generated by the injection fluid pressure sensor 156 is readily available at surface.
During circulation of the drilling fluid 150 through the drill string 112 and bore hole 106, a mixture of drilling fluid 150, possibly including cuttings, and the injection fluid flows through an upper part 149 of the annulus 115, down stream of the injection point 144. Thereafter the mixture proceeds to what is generally referred to as the backpressure system 131.
A pressure isolating seal is provided to seal against the drill string and contain a pressure in the well bore annulus. In the embodiment of
Referring to
The drilling fluid 150 exits the choke 130 and flows through an optional flow meter 126 to be directed through an optional degasser 1 and solids separation equipment 129. Optional degasser 1 and solids separation equipment 129 are designed to remove excess gas and other contaminates, including cuttings, from the drilling fluid 150. After passing solids separation equipment 129, the drilling fluid 150 is returned to reservoir 136.
Flow meter 126 may be a mass-balance type or other high-resolution flow meter. A back pressure sensor 147 can be optionally provided in the drilling fluid discharge conduit 124 upstream of the variable flow restrictive device. A flow meter, similar to flow meter 126, may be placed upstream of the back pressure means 131 in addition to the back pressure sensor 147.
Back pressure control means including a pressure monitoring system 146 are provided for monitoring data relevant for the annulus pressure, and providing control signals to at least the back pressure system 131 and optionally also to the injection fluid injection system and/or to the primary pump means.
The ability to provide adjustable back pressure during the entire drilling and completing process is a significant improvement over conventional drilling systems, in particular in relation to UBD where the drilling fluid pressure must be maintained as low as possible in the operational window.
In general terms, the required back pressure to obtain the desired down hole pressure is determined by obtaining information on the existing down hole pressure of the drilling fluid in the vicinity of the BHA 113, referred to as the bottom hole pressure, comparing the information with a desired down hole pressure and utilizing the differential between these for determining a set-point back pressure and controlling the back pressure means in order to establish a back pressure close to the set-point back pressure.
The injection fluid pressure in the injection fluid supply passage represents a relatively accurate indicator for the drilling fluid pressure in the drilling fluid gap at the depth where the injection fluid is injected into the drilling fluid gap. Therefore, a pressure signal generated by an injection fluid pressure sensor anywhere in the injection fluid supply passage can be suitably utilized, for instance as an input signal for controlling the back pressure means, for monitoring the drilling fluid pressure in the drilling fluid return passage.
The pressure signal can, if so desired, optionally be compensated for the weight of the injection fluid column and/or for the dynamic pressure loss that may be generated in the injection fluid between the injection fluid pressure sensor in the injection fluid supply passage and where the injection into the drilling fluid return passage takes place, for instance, in order to obtain an exact value of the injection pressure in the drilling fluid return passage at the depth where the injection fluid is injected into the drilling fluid gap.
The pressure of the injection fluid in the injection fluid supply passage 141 is advantageously utilized for obtaining information relevant for determining the current bottom hole pressure. As long as the injection fluid is being injected into the drilling fluid return stream, the pressure of the injection fluid at the injection depth can be assumed to be equal to the drilling fluid pressure at the injection point 144. Thus, the pressure as determined by injection fluid pressure sensor 156 can advantageously be utilized to generate a pressure signal for use as a feedback signal for controlling or regulating the back pressure system.
It is remarked that the change in hydrostatic contribution to the down hole pressure that would result from a possible variation in the injection fluid injection rate, is in close approximation compensated by the above described controlled re-adjusting of the back pressure means. Thus by controlling the back pressure means in accordance with the invention, the fluid pressure in the bore hole is almost independent of the rate of injection fluid injection.
One possible way to utilize the pressure signal corresponding to the injection fluid pressure, is to control the back pressure system so as to maintain the injection fluid pressure on a certain suitable constant value throughout the drilling or completion operation. The accuracy is increased when the injection point 144 is in close proximity to the bottom of the bore hole.
When the injection point 144 is not so close to the bottom of the bore hole, the magnitude of the pressure differential over the part of the drilling fluid return passage stretching between the injection point 144 and the bottom of the hole is preferably to be established. For this, a hydraulic model can be utilized as will be described below.
In a preferred embodiment, the pressure difference of the drilling fluid in the drilling fluid return passage in a lower part of the bore hole stretching between the injection fluid injection point and the bottom of the well bore, can be calculated using a hydraulic model taking into account inter alia the well geometry. Since the hydraulic model is herewith only used for calculating the pressure differential over a relatively small section of the bore hole, the precision is expected to be much better than when the pressure differential over the entire well length must be calculated.
Signals representative of the data inputs are transmitted to a control unit (CCS) 230, which is in it self comprised of a drill rig control unit 232, one or more drilling operator's stations 234, a dynamic annular pressure control (DAPC) processor 236 and a back pressure programmable logic controller (PLC) 238, all of which are connected by a common data network or industrial type bus 240. In particular, the CCS 230 is arranged to receive and collect data and make the data accessible via the common data network or industrial type bus 240 to the DAPC processor 236.
The DAPC processor 236 can suitably be a personal computer based SCADA system running a hydraulic model and connected to the PLC 238. The DAPC processor 236 serves three functions, monitoring the state of the borehole pressure during drilling operations, predicting borehole response to continued drilling, and issuing commands to the backpressure PLC to control the back pressure means 131. In addition, commands may also be issued to one or more of the primary pump means 138 and the injection fluid injection system. The specific logic associated with the DAPC processor 236 will be discussed further below.
A schematic model of the functionality of the DAPC pressure monitoring system 146 is set forth in
Still referring to
When N2, or another suitable gas, is used as the injection fluid, the pressure in the annulus 115 at the injection depth can be assumed to be equal to the injection fluid pressure at surface compensated for the weight of the injection fluid column. When a liquid is used at any appreciable injection rate, a dynamic pressure loss must be taken into account as well.
The pressure differential 262 over a lower part of the annulus, the lower part stretching between the injection point 144 and the bottom hole vicinity, is added to the pressure 263 at the injection point 144.
The input parameters for determining this pressure differential fall into three main groups. The first are relatively fixed parameters 250, including parameters such as well, drill string, hole and casing geometry, drill bit nozzle diameters, and well trajectory. While it is recognized that the actual well trajectory may vary from the planned trajectory, the variance may be taken into account with a correction to the planned trajectory. Also within this group of parameters are temperature profile of the fluid in the annulus and the fluid composition. As with the geometrical parameters, these are generally known and do not vary quickly over the course of the drilling operations. In particular, with the DAPC system, one objective is keeping the drilling fluid 150 density and composition relatively constant, using backpressure to provide the additional pressure for control of the annulus pressure.
The second group of parameters 252 are highly variable in nature and are sensed and logged in real time. The rig data acquisition system provides this information via common data network 240 to the DAPC processor 236. This information includes injection fluid pressure data 203 generated by injection fluid pressure sensor 156, flow rate data provided by both down hole and return flow meters 152 and 126 and/or by measurement of pump strokes, respectively, the drill string rate of penetration (ROP) or velocity, the drill string rotational velocity, the bit depth, and the well depth, all the latter being derived from direct rig sensor measurements.
Furthermore, referring to
A control module 258 calculates the pressure in the annulus over the lower part well bore length stretching between the injection point 144 and the bottom hole utilizing various models. The pressure differential in the well bore is a function not only of the static pressure or weight of the relevant fluid column in the well, but also includes pressures losses caused by drilling operations, including fluid displacement by the drill string, frictional pressure losses caused by fluid motion in the annulus, and other factors. In order to calculate the pressure within the well, the control module 258 considers the relevant part of the well as a finite number of elements, each assigned to a relevant segment of well bore length. In each of the elements the dynamic pressure and the fluid weight is calculated and used to determine the pressure differential 262 for the segment. The segments are summed and the pressure differential for at least the lower end of the well profile is determined.
It is known that the velocity of the fluid in the well bore is proportional to the flow rate of the fluid 150 being pumped down hole plus the fluid flow produced from the formation 104 below the injection point 144, the latter contribution being relevant for under-balanced conditions. A measurement of the pumped flow and an estimate of the fluid produced from the formation 104 are used to calculate the total flow through the bore hole and the corresponding dynamic pressure loss. The calculation is made for a series of segments of the well, taking into account the fluid compressibility, estimated cutting loading and the thermal expansion of the fluid for the specified segment, which is itself related to the temperature profile for that segment of the well. The fluid viscosity at the temperature profile for the segment is also instrumental in determining dynamic pressure losses for the segment. The composition of the fluid is also considered in determining compressibility and the thermal expansion coefficient. The drill string movement, in particular its rate of penetration (ROP), is related to the surge and swab pressures encountered during drilling operations as the drill string is moved into or out of the borehole. The drill string rotation is also used to determine dynamic pressure losses, as it creates a frictional force between the fluid in the annulus and the drill string. The bit depth, well depth, and well/string geometry are all used to help create the borehole segments to be modelled.
In order to calculate the weight of the drilling fluid contained in the well, the preferred embodiment considers not only the hydrostatic pressure exerted by fluid 150, but also the fluid compression, fluid thermal expansion and the cuttings loading of the fluid seen during operations. All of these factors go into a calculation of the “static pressure”.
Dynamic pressure considers many of the same factors in determining static pressure. However, it further considers a number of other factors. Among them is the concept of laminar versus turbulent flow. The flow characteristics are a function of the estimated roughness, hole and string geometry and the flow velocity, density and viscosity of the fluid. The above includes borehole eccentricity and specific drill pipe geometry (box/pin upsets) that affect the flow velocity seen in the borehole annulus. The dynamic pressure calculation further includes cuttings accumulation down hole, string movement's (axial movement and rotation) effect on dynamic pressure of the fluid.
The pressure differential for the entire annulus is determined in accordance with the above, and compared to the set-point pressure 256 in the control module 264. The desired backpressure 266 is then determined and passed on to a programmable logic controller 238, which generates back pressure control signals.
The above discussion of how backpressure is generally calculated utilized several down hole parameters, including down hole pressure and estimates of fluid viscosity and fluid density. These parameters can be determined down hole, for instance using sensor package 119, and transmitted up the mud column using pressure pulses that travel to surface at approximately the speed of sound, for instance by means of telemetry system 122. This travelling speed and the limited bandwidth of such systems usually cause a delay between measuring the data down hole and receiving the data at surface. This delay can range from a few seconds up to several minutes. Consequently, down hole pressure measurements can often not be input to the DAPC model on a real time basis. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that there is likely to be a difference between the measured down hole pressure, when transmitted up to the surface, and the predicted down hole pressure for that depth at the time the data is received at surface.
For this reason, the down hole pressure data is preferably time stamped or depth stamped to allow the control system to synchronize the received pressure data with historical pressure predictions stored in memory. Based on the synchronised historical data, the DAPC system uses a regression method to compute adjustments to some input parameters to obtain the best correlation between predictions and measurements of down hole pressure. The corrections to input parameters may be made by varying any of the available variable input parameters. In the preferred embodiment, only the fluid density and the fluid viscosity are modified in order to correct the predicted down hole pressure. Further, in the present embodiment the actual down hole pressure measurement is used only to calibrate the calculated down hole pressure. It is not utilized to directly adjust the backpressure set-point.
Optionally, valve 123 may be provided to selectively isolate the back pressure pump 128 from the drilling fluid discharge system.
Back pressure pump 128 can be engaged to ensure that sufficient flow passes the choke system 130 to be able to maintain backpressure, even when there is insufficient flow coming from the annulus 115 to maintain pressure on choke 130. However, in UBD operations it may often suffice to increase the weight of the fluid contained in the upper part 149 of the well bore annulus by turning down the injection fluid injection rate when the circulation rate of drilling fluid 150 via the drill string 112 is reduced or interrupted.
The back pressure control means in this embodiment can generate the control signals for the back pressure system, suitably adjusting not only the variable choke 130 but also the back pressure pump 128 and/or valve 123.
A manifold of valves is provided downstream of the back pressure system 131, to enable selection of the reservoir to which drilling mud returning from the well bore is directed. In the embodiment of
The back pressure pump 128 and valve 123 are optionally added to this embodiment.
The manifold of valves may also include a two way valve 125 provided for either feeding drilling fluid 150 from reservoir 136 via conduit 119A or from reservoir 2 via conduit 119B to a backpressure pump 128 optionally provided in parallel fluid communication with the drilling fluid return passage 115 and the choke 130.
In operation, valve 125 would select either conduit 119A or conduit 119B, and the backpressure pump 128 engaged to ensure sufficient flow passes the choke system to be able to maintain backpressure, even when there is no flow coming from the annulus 115.
Unlike the drilling fluid passage inside the drill string, the injection fluid supply passage can preferably be dedicated to one task, which is supplying the injection fluid for injection into the drilling fluid gap. This way, its hydrostatic and hydrodynamic interaction with the injection fluid can be accurately determined and kept constant during an operation, so that the weight of the injection fluid and dynamic pressure loss in the supply passage can be accurately established.
Embodiments of the invention are at least applicable to pressure control during under-balanced drilling operations, at-balance drilling operations, over-balance drilling operations or completion operations.
It will be understood that the invention is enabled with only one injection fluid pressure sensor, but that a plurality of injection fluid pressure sensors can be utilized, if so desired, for instance positioned in mutually different locations.
It is remarked that WO 02/084067 describes a drilling well configuration wherein the drilling fluid gap is formed by an inner well bore annulus, and an injection fluid supply passage is provided in the form of a second, outer annulus, for bringing the injection fluid from the surface level to a desired injection depth. Fluid is injected into the inner annulus for dynamically controlling bottom hole circulation pressure in the well bore wherein a high injection rate of a light fluid results in a low bottom hole pressure.
In contrast, the present patent application utilizes back pressure means for controlling the bottom hole pressure, whereby the injection fluid injection pressure is utilized for controlling the back pressure means. It has been found that, by controlling back pressure means in response of the injection fluid injection pressure, the down hole pressure is more accurately controllable and more stable than by controlling the down hole pressure by directly regulating the injection fluid injection rate.
Nevertheless, the injection fluid injection rate may be controlled in concert with controlling the back pressure means. This is of particular advantage when starting or stopping circulation in order to avoid the injection fluid injection rate being maintained at unrealistic values.
In order to facilitate the accuracy of bottom hole pressure determination, the injection fluid is preferably injected as close as possible to the bottom of the bore hole.
The injection fluid supply passage is preferably led to or close to the surface level from where the drill string reaches into the bore hole, thereby providing an opportunity to generate the pressure signal at surface or close to the surface. This is more convenient, and in particular allows for faster monitoring of the pressure signal, than when the pressure signal would be generated at great depth below the surface level.
The injection fluid can be a liquid or a gas. Preferably, the injection fluid injection system is arranged to inject an injection fluid having a mass density lower than that of the drilling fluid. By injecting a lower density injection fluid, the hydrostatic component to the down hole pressure is reduced. This allows for a higher dynamic range of control for the back pressure means.
However, the injection fluid is preferably provided in the form of a gas, particularly an inert gas such as for example nitrogen gas (N2). The dynamic pressure loss of the gas in the injection fluid supply passage can optionally be taken into account, but its contribution to the pressure signal is expected to be low compared to the weight of the gas column. Thus, the gas pressure compensated for the weight of the gas column may for practical purposes be assumed to be almost equal to the drilling fluid pressure in the drilling fluid gap at the injection depth.
In the embodiments shown and/or described above, the injection fluid supply passage is provided in the form of an outer annulus. The injection fluid supply passage may also be provided in a different form, for instance via a drill pipe gas injection system. This option is particularly advantageous when an outer annulus is no available for fluid injection. But more importantly, this option allows for the injection fluid injection point 144 to be located very close to the bottom of the hole so that the injection fluid pressure in the injection fluid supply passage gives an accurate parameter as a starting point for establishing an accurate value for the bottom hole pressure. Nevertheless, an electro-magnetic MWD sensor suite may be employed for pressure readout to be used in the same manner as described above to calibrate a hydraulics model.
This application is a continuation of International application No. PCT/EP2004/051614, filed 27 Jul. 2004, which claims priority of European application No. 03077606.6, filed 19 Aug. 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
296564 | Hemje | Apr 1884 | A |
553128 | McDonald | Jan 1896 | A |
2169223 | Christian | Aug 1939 | A |
2628129 | Hosmer et al. | Feb 1953 | A |
2946565 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
3354970 | Lummus | Nov 1967 | A |
3365009 | Bumham et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3429387 | Brown | Feb 1969 | A |
3443643 | Jones | May 1969 | A |
3470971 | Dower | Oct 1969 | A |
3488765 | Anderson | Jan 1970 | A |
3497020 | Kammerer, Jr. | Feb 1970 | A |
3508577 | Vincent et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3552402 | Levy | Jan 1971 | A |
3559739 | Hutchison | Feb 1971 | A |
3677353 | Baker | Jul 1972 | A |
3738436 | Litchfield et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3827511 | Jones | Aug 1974 | A |
3868832 | Biffle | Mar 1975 | A |
4310058 | Bourgoyne, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4315553 | Stallings | Feb 1982 | A |
4406595 | Robertson et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4460318 | Horton | Jul 1984 | A |
4611578 | Heimes et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4630675 | Neipling et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4630691 | Hooper | Dec 1986 | A |
4653597 | Johnson | Mar 1987 | A |
4683944 | Curlett | Aug 1987 | A |
4700739 | Flohr | Oct 1987 | A |
4709900 | Dyhr | Dec 1987 | A |
4739325 | MacLeod | Apr 1988 | A |
4755111 | Cocchi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4924949 | Curlett | May 1990 | A |
5010966 | Stokley et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5048620 | Maher | Sep 1991 | A |
5168932 | Worrall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5305836 | Holbrook et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5348107 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359324 | Clark et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5437308 | Morin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443128 | du Chaffaut | Aug 1995 | A |
5447197 | Rae et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474142 | Bowden | Dec 1995 | A |
5547506 | Rae et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5638904 | Misselbrook et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5806612 | Vorhoff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857522 | Bradfield et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890549 | Sprehe | Apr 1999 | A |
5975219 | Sprehe | Nov 1999 | A |
6033192 | Wood | Mar 2000 | A |
6035952 | Bradfield et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102673 | Mott et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119772 | Pruet | Sep 2000 | A |
6119779 | Gipson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6176323 | Weirich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177882 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189612 | Ward | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6325159 | Peterman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352129 | Best | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367566 | Hill | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370082 | Gardner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374925 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394195 | Schubert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412554 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6484816 | Koederitz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6527062 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6571873 | Maus | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575244 | Chang et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6920942 | Koederitz | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20010050185 | Calder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011288 | Leuchtenberg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108783 | Elkins et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112888 | Leuchtenberg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030079912 | Beuchtenberg | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098181 | Aronstam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030181338 | Sweatman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040005667 | Ratti et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040069504 | Krueger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070151763 | Reitsma et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19813087 | Sep 1999 | DE |
0030557 | May 1983 | EP |
0436242 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0298673 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0947750 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1271488 | Jan 2003 | EP |
2323870 | Oct 1998 | GB |
1579979 | Jul 1990 | SU |
9742395 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9816716 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9828517 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9934090 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0004269 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0079092 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0120120 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0075477 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0250395 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0250398 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02084067 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03025334 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03071091 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03071091 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2004005667 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004074627 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060175090 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2004/051614 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11334142 | US |