Drilling/milling guide and keel cut preparation system

Abstract
An instrument system, associated milling or drilling guide and method include use of a trial implant of a size corresponding to an actual implant for the intervertebral space, with a milling guide mounted on the trial implant. The milling guide includes a longitudinal guide chamber which is tapered from a forward end to a rearward end. The system also includes a cutting tool which is received in the guide chamber in order to form a cutout in an adjacent vertebra. This cutting tool includes a bearing member which pivotally engages the rearward end to form a pivot axis for the cutting tool in the tapered guide chamber. Either the milling guide can be inverted to form the cutout in the other vertebra; or the milling guide can be provided with two guide chambers, to be used with one cutting tool moved between them or two respective cutting tools.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to intervertebral implants, and more specifically, it relates to new and improved guides, systems and methods for cutting a keel slot in preparation for inserting an intervertebral implant in the intervertebral space.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Currently, when it is necessary to completely remove a disc from between adjacent vertebrae, the conventional procedure is to fuse the adjacent vertebrae together. More recently, there have been important developments in the field of disc replacement, namely disc arthroplasty, which involves the insertion of an artificial intervertebral disc implant into the intervertebral space between adjacent vertebrae. This then allows limited universal movement of the adjacent vertebrae with respect to each other.


Some instruments have been developed to date for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant. These include a set of different sizes of trial implants, different ones of which are inserted into a cleaned out intervertebral space until the correct size trial implant has been determined, thereby determining the size of the actual disc implant to be permanently inserted. The trial implant may have a fixed stop member in the form of a pin fixed to the rear end of the trial implant and extending vertically up and down for limiting movement of the trial implant into the intervertebral space.


Some disc implants have a raised keel on each endplate which requires that a cutout be formed in the vertebrae adjacent the intervertebral space for receiving these raised keels. One known arrangement for forming these cutouts is with a chisel which can be mounted to move along slots in the top and bottom of the selected trial implant as the chisel cuts into the adjacent vertebrae to form the cutouts.


Besides a slot made by chiseling, drilling or milling can also be used, and combinations of these procedures are possible as well. However, where a chisel cut is made using a chisel and a mallet, quite high forces are applied in direction of the cut. With drilling, lesser forces are applied, but the drill can slip of or bend during drilling. With milling, a precise cut is made without high forces, but the milling tool needs to have a certain diameter, because otherwise it will break during milling and consequently milling is not always possible where a long narrow cut is required. Thus, a procedure used to perform narrow cuts without applying high forces is desirable. Exemplary of such prior art devices and methods are those disclosed in USPA 2004-0215198 (Marnay et al.) and USPA 2006-0064100 (Bertagnoli et al.), which are hereby incorporated by reference.


One known artificial disc implant is shown in Published Application No. WO 01/01893, published Jan. 11, 2001; and instruments for inserting same are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,118,580 (Beyersdorff—or Published Application No. WO 01/19295) and USPA 2004-0215198 (Marnay—or Published Application No. WO 04/098380). These references are also hereby incorporated by reference.


While these known instruments and methods represent a substantial improvement in the art, there exists a continuing need for improvements in the field of instruments and methods for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial intervertebral disc implant.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The purpose of the present invention is provide new and improved instruments and related methods for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial intervertebral disc implant.


The instruments of the present invention may be used to prepare the intervertebral space at any location along the spine including especially the lumbar and cervical spines. However, since the cervical vertebrae are so small relative to the lumbar vertebrae, i.e., about 20% of the area of the lumbar spine vertebrae, some instruments may be more suited than others for the cervical spine.


At present, the intervertebral implant is normally inserted from the patient's anterior moving towards the patient's posterior. However, it is to be understood that the implant, the instruments and the method can also be designed and arranged to insert the implant laterally, i.e., from the side, in which case the keels will be oriented on the implant for such lateral movement and the cutouts in the adjacent vertebrae will be opened toward a lateral side to receive the keel. To avoid confusion with respect to the patient's anatomy, the invention will be described herein with respect to more simple terminology which relates to the instruments and methods themselves. For example, in describing the invention, the terms “front” or “forward” mean the part of the instrument which faces toward the vertebrae or is moving in the direction of movement toward the vertebrae, while the words “back”, “rear” or “rearward” refer to the end of the instrument farthest from the vertebrae or moving away from the vertebrae. Also, in this application, the words “upper” or “lower” or “uppermost” or “lowermost” or any other words describing the orientation of the intervertebral implant or the instruments or methods associated therewith are used only for convenience and are not intended to convey any limitation. More specifically, the parts of the implant, the instruments and/or the methods described in this application with reference to the upper part can in fact be positioned as the superior or inferior part within the patient's vertebrae, with the other of the two parts being the opposite part.


It is thus an object of the present invention to provide new and improved instruments and methods for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial intervertebral disc implant.


The instruments and the methods of the present invention are particularly adapted for use with an artificial intervertebral disc implant having upper and lower parts which undergo limited universal movement with respect to each other, with the upper and lower surfaces of the upper and lower parts engaging the adjacent vertebral surfaces. Most of the instruments and methods of the present invention are also for use where the implant has a keel extending from the vertebrae engaging surfaces of the implant into cutouts formed in the adjacent vertebrae.


In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided improved instruments and methods for inserting different size trial implants (until the correct trial implant has been determined) in combination with forming the cutouts in the vertebrae. The instrument system includes a trial implant of a size corresponding to an actual implant for the intervertebral space, and a milling guide mounted on the trial implant. The milling guide includes a (or two, side by side) longitudinal guide chamber which is tapered from a forward end to a rearward end. The system also includes a cutting tool which is received in the guide chamber in order to form a cutout in an adjacent vertebra. This cutting tool includes a bearing member which pivotally engages the rearward end to form a pivot axis for the cutting tool in the tapered guide chamber. Either the milling guide can be inverted to form the cutout in the other vertebra; or the milling guide can be provided with two guide chambers, to be used with one cutting tool moved between them or two respective cutting tools.


In a preferred embodiment of the instrument system, the guide chamber is tapered in a cranial to caudal direction. In addition, the cutting tool has a cutting head which is conically shaped and the trial head includes a longitudinal groove adjacent the guide chamber in which the cutting head is receivable. This longitudinal groove is also preferably larger than the cutting head to provide a repository for cut vertebra.


Also in a preferred embodiment, the trial implant includes an adjustable stop which engages the adjacent vertebra when the trial head is properly positioned in the intervertebral space. Then, the milling guide includes a mounting means for movably mounting the milling guide on the trial body to a preset position. In addition, the bearing member is movably adjustable on the cutting tool.


In the preferred embodiment, the rearward end of the milling guide engaged by the bearing member includes a bearing mechanism so that the pivot axis does not move during cutting. In one embodiment, the bearing mechanism is a curvature of a portion of the rearward end engaged by the bearing member. In another embodiment, the bearing mechanism is a movable bearing mounted in the rearward end; which can be removably mounted if desired. In still another embodiment, the bearing mechanism includes an elongate tube extending towards the forward end in order to provide additional support for the cutting tool during cutting.


Also in accordance with first aspect, a milling guide and method of using the milling guide to produce the cutouts are provided. With the milling guide, and in the method, rotating and moving of the cutting tool is used to produce a windshield wiper sweeping motion of the end of the cutting tool in order to form a cutout in an adjacent vertebra. This cutting is made by the longitudinal moving of a bearing member located on the cutting tool until the bearing member pivotally engages the rearward end of the milling guide to form a pivot axis for the cutting tool in the tapered guide chamber.


In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, a milling guide for use with an instrument system for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an implant, includes a mounting means for mounting on the trial implant at a preset position and a pair of longitudinal guide chambers. These guide chamber extends from a common entrance hole in a rearward end to a respective exit hole at a forward end, Thus, a drilling tool is received in the entrance end is selectively movable out of either exit hole as desired and in order to form two drilled holes in the adjacent vertebra.


It is an object of the present invention to provide new and improved instruments for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant.


It is another object of the present invention to provide new and improved methods for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant.


These and other objects of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description to follow, together with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an intervertebral implant adjacent an intervertebral space between two vertebral bodies.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the vertebral bodies now having keel slots provided therein.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an intervertebral implant partially inserted into the intervertebral space between two vertebral bodies.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the intervertebral implant fully inserted into the intervertebral space between two vertebral bodies.



FIG. 5 is a front, side and plan perspective view of a milling system in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a back, side and plan perspective view of the milling system of FIG. 5 positioned with the trial implant in an intervertebral space.



FIG. 7 is a front, side and plan perspective view of a trial implant in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a front, side and plan perspective view of the trial implant of FIG. 7 with an attached handle.



FIG. 9 is a front, side and plan perspective view of a milling guide in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a cross sectional front, side and plan perspective view of the milling system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 11 is a back, side and plan perspective view of the trial implant of FIG. 7 inserted in the intervertebral space as an adjustable stop is adjusted.



FIG. 12 is a back, side and plan perspective view of the trial implant of FIG. 11 positively positioned in the intervertebral space.



FIG. 13 is a back, side and plan perspective view of the trial implant of FIG. 12 as the milling guide of FIG. 9 is mounted thereon.



FIG. 14 is a back, side and plan perspective view of the trial implant of FIG. 12 with the milling guide of FIG. 9 mounted thereon.



FIG. 15 is a back, side and plan perspective view showing the initial insertion of a reamer into the milling guide of FIG. 9 mounted on the trial implant of FIG. 12.



FIG. 16 is a back, side and plan perspective view showing the initial cutting using the reamer in the milling guide mounted on the trial implant.



FIG. 17 is a back, side and plan perspective view showing the complete cutting using the reamer where a stop thereon engages the milling guide mounted on the trial implant.



FIGS. 18-20 are cross sectional front, side and plan perspective views showing the cutting action of the reamer in the milling guide.



FIG. 21 is an enlarged partially cross sectional front, side and plan perspective view showing the keel cut made with the reamer using the cutting action depicted in FIGS. 18-20.



FIG. 22 is a back, side and plan perspective view of an alternative design where the proximal end of the milling guide has bearings.



FIG. 23 is a plan view of an alternative design of a trial implant head with a through hole.



FIG. 24 is back, side and plan perspective view of an alternative design of a disposable pivot element.



FIG. 25 is a front, side and plan perspective view of the disposable pivot element depicted in FIG. 24.



FIG. 26 is a back, side and plan perspective view of another alternative milling system with a pivot element having an elongated tube.



FIG. 27 is a front, side and plan perspective view of an alternative milling guide used for drilling.



FIG. 28 is a front, side and plan perspective view of a modified embodiment of the alternative milling guide depicted in FIG. 27.



FIG. 29 is a back, side and plan perspective view of a handle attached to the milling system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 30 is a front, side and plan perspective view of an alternate milling guide used with a box chisel.



FIG. 31 is side elevation view of an adjustable bushing mounted on a portion of a reamer.



FIG. 32 is side elevation view of a bushing mounted on a portion of a reamer together with spacing washers.



FIG. 33 is a back, side and plan perspective view of an alternative, taller pivot element to that shown in FIG. 25.



FIG. 34 is a front elevation view of an alternative milling guide to that shown in FIG. 9 having two mill chambers on the upper part.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The instruments and methods described herein are applicable for preparing a wide range of artificial disc implants for insertion into an intervertebral space, typically for TDR (total disc replacement). For those instruments and methods described herein which include the concept of forming cutouts to receive raised keels, the instruments and methods described herein are adaptable for use with any artificial disc implant having such keels. Thus, the depiction and description of the referenced implant is exemplary.


With reference now to the drawings in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the various views, it will initially be appreciated that the present invention is directed to improving the primary stability of an intervertebral implant 10, such as that disclosed U.S. Pat. No. 7,204,852 (Marnay et al.), which is located between adjacent vertebral bodies 12 (for fusion or non-fusion procedures) as shown in FIGS. 1-4. Implant 10 is designed with a keel 14 on both endplates 16 contacting the adjacent vertebral bodies 12 as shown in FIG. 1. In order to position implant 10 into the disc space provided after a discectomy, a cut needs to be made in the inferior as well as in the superior vertebral bodies 12 to provide slots 18 as shown best in FIG. 2. Implant 10 is shown partially between vertebral bodies 12 in FIG. 3, and then fully inserted in FIG. 4.


The large majority of surgical techniques for TDR use chisels to perform or prepare the keel cuts or slots 18. However, in accordance with the present invention, a drilling/milling system 20 has been developed as an alternative in cases with hard bone and/or sclerotic endplates in order to reduce the impact forces and in order to improve the cleaning of the posterior aspect of the keel cut. Milling system 20 includes the following major instruments that interact with each other as broadly shown in FIGS. 5-6: a trial implant 22 with an adjustable stop 24; a detachable handle 26 for trial implant 22 (shown only in FIG. 8); a milling guide 28; and a reamer 30 (which is used with existing/known power tool equipment).


Trial implant 22 is shown in greater detail in FIG. 7. It fulfills the known function of determining a correct height of implant 10 to be used, for example where implant 10 comes in different heights, there will be a different trial implant 22 to accommodate each height (such as 5 mm, 6 mm and 7 mm). A selected trial implant 22 having a one-piece implant head 32 is thus inserted between the vertebral bodies 12 with the help of detachable handle 26 to see if the selected trial head 32 fits properly, so that the correct implant height (and size, if desired) is then known. Obviously, various heights of trial implants 22 with corresponding heads 32 are available for such a trial and error determination; and if desired, different sized footprint and/or shapes of implants, etc. can also be tried if desired to determine the best implant 10 to be used. In accordance with the present invention, once the correct size of trial implant 22 is inserted, body 34 of trail implant 22 then subsequently serves as base for milling guide 28 to be connect to or to be mounted on.


As shown in FIG. 8, detachable handle 26 is removably attached (as by a ball/détente interaction) to threaded shaft 36 of adjustable stop 24 for convenience. It will be appreciated that adjustable stop 24 is best shown in FIG. 7 as well and is movably mounted in the rear of body 34 of trial implant 22 by threaded shaft 36. Adjustable stop 24 includes upper and lower vertebra engaging members 38 whose longitudinal position relative to trial head 32 is thus adjustable. Engaging members 38 are attached to shaft 36 and guided for movement in trial body 34 as shown, and engaging members 38 are positioned symmetrically relative to the midline of trial implant 22 for an improved resistance to A/P forces. In addition, the split design of engaging members 38 allows reamer 30 to move in between the two engaging members 38, with engaging members 38 offering additional soft tissue protection from reamer 30. Alternatively, trial implant 22 could include only one side stop member or two stop members placed on either side of the upper and lower vertebral bodies 12. Trial implant 22 includes a central groove 40 in trial head 32 on the cranial (upper) side and on the caudal (lower) side into which reamer 30 can be moved or plunge into. Alternatively, trial body 32 could include a cavity through the entire (split/forked) trial with the same function.


Milling guide 28 is best shown in FIG. 9. Milling guide 28 is designed to connect to trial body 34 of trial implant 22. This connection occurs as milling guide 28 is guided for movement along shaft 36 at the rear of trial implant 22 and additionally guided by guidance feature 42 running along most of the length of trial implant 22 as best seen in FIG. 7. This guidance feature 42 is a combination of short flanges 44 outstanding along either side (upper and lower) of trial body 34 and correspondingly spaced and shaped grooves 46 provided in the mating surfaces of milling guide 28. Milling guide 28 is positioned on trial body 34 until stop surfaces 48 mate up with the rear end of trial body 34 which results in a fixed distance between the proximal end of milling guide 28 and the distal end of trial implant 22. Preferably, a locking mechanism 50 is used to prevent milling guide 28 from unintentionally disengaging from trial implant 22 and/or to eliminate any clearance/play between milling guide 28 and trial implant 22. Locking mechanism 50 is shown as mating wedges 52, but leaf springs, locking screws, or other mechanisms known in the art could be used. Milling guide 28 also includes a handle attachment member 53 on one side to which a handle (such as handle 106 in FIG. 29) is removably attached as by a threaded connection.


As shown in FIG. 10, milling guide 28 defines upper and lower chambers 54 which guide respective reamers 30. Each chamber 54 is tapered from front to rear as shown best in FIGS. 18-20 to allow for a windshield wiper milling cycle 60 (see arrow in FIG. 19, and compare the reamer 30 position in FIGS. 18-20) around a pivot axis 56 located at the rear end of milling guide. In the embodiment shown, reamer 30 is restricted laterally, and is allowed milling in only a cranial-caudal direction. However, in alternate embodiments, chambers 54 could allow for milling in at least one other direction up to all directions. The milling function and technique is described in more detail hereafter. Further, chamber 54 could also be more cylindrical in nature to allow for a more translational milling cycle in cranial-caudal direction.


As an alternative to the disclosed embodiment, it will be appreciated that milling guide 28 could instead include only one reamer guiding chamber 54 which would be positioned on one (upper or lower) side of trial implant 22. Then, after completing the first keel cut, reamer 30 would then be retracted, the milling guide turned by 180° and reinserted before milling the second (other side) keel cut. The reamer could also be pre-assembled to such a milling guide, to easily allow this milling guide to retract a certain distance before turning and reinsertion for the other keel cut. As another alternative, the milling guide and the trial implant could be designed as one instrument with the same functions described above.


As desired, different reamers 30 could be used with system 20 depending on whether drilling and/or milling (side cutting) capabilities are primarily needed. Exemplary reamers would thus include, for example, regular drills, Lindemann reamers, and cranial burrs; and other reamers as known and used in the art can also be used as desired. The cutting end of reamer 30 is preferably conically shaped, with a smaller diameter at the distal (forward) end slowly expanding towards the bigger shaft diameter. The benefit of the conical shape is that the smaller tip compensates for the small play of the reamer within chamber 54 of milling guide 28. But alternatively, the reamer tip might be cylindrical, tapered or a combination of cylindrical, tapered and/or conical as desired. Each reamer 30 also includes an integrated bushing 58 which will come to rest against the back end of milling guide 30 to control the depth of penetration of reamer 28 into vertebral body 12, in conjunction with the use of adjustable stop 24 as noted above. When bushing 58 comes to rest against the back end, it then acts as a bearing member against the back end as described more fully below.


In use, drilling/milling system 20 is used in the following manner and with reference to FIGS. 11-17. Initially, after performing the discectomy (FIG. 1), the surgeon uses the trial implants to find the correct height (and footprint size if desired) of the implant 10 that will be needed for each particular vertebral space. As each, and more importantly, as the final or correct, trial implant is inserted with the integrated adjustable stop 24 (FIG. 11), adjustable stop 24 not only secures trial implant 22 in its right position relative to the vertebral bodies 12 but it also assures that trial implant 22 will not slide further back into the spinal canal (FIG. 12). Once the right size and correct position as been found, milling guide 28 is mounted to trial body 34 by sliding milling guide 28 over trial body 34 using guidance feature 42 (FIG. 13) and locking milling guide 28 to trial body 34 with locking mechanism 50 (FIG. 14).


Next, the surgeon performs the first cut on the vertebral body 12 of his choice. Using a reamer or drill with side cutting capabilities, the surgeon first drills/cuts straight into vertebral body 12 until bushing 58 on reamer 30 is stopped by milling guide 28 as shown by FIGS. 15-17. Then, the surgeon sweeps in the direction of the endplate to complete the keel cut as shown in FIGS. 18-20. The surgeon could also start the cut by drilling/cutting along the endplate, and then sweeping into the vertebral body if desired; or drilling intermediate the two and sweeping both up and down. Bushing 58 placed on reamer 30 avoids drilling/cutting too deep into vertebral body 12, while acting as a bearing member against the back end of milling guide 30. Depicted in FIG. 21 is an enlarge view of a keel cut or slot 18 made with system 20.


Finally, the surgeon removes reamer 30 and repeats the same operation on the other vertebral body 12. FIG. 2 shows both keel cuts 18 as made by system 20 in the respective vertebral bodies 12. The cutting tool is conveniently powered by any known power tool, such as E-pen, MidasRex, Stryker TPS, etc. The first used reamer 30 could also be left in place after completing the cut or the first drilling hole to stabilize the construct while using a second reamer to mill the keel cut on the opposite side, as shown in FIG. 10 depicted both reamers 30. If the bone is extremely hard, reamer 30 could also be used as a drill several times to weaken the bone before completing the keel cut with the sweeping milling step. Bushing 58 acting as a stop on reamer 30 could alternatively be detachable; or adjustable to allow for different drilling/milling depth, as shown by bushing 58′ in FIG. 31 which is adjustable by disengagement of a simple set screw 59 or the like.


It will be noted that milling guide 28 provides tapered mill chambers 54 which allow the reamer to pivot about the proximal end of the guide as shown in FIG. 18-20. For this reason, the proximal (rearward) end 64 of milling guide 28 is slightly curved towards the cranial and caudal ends. This allows reamer 30 to drop slightly deeper when angling towards trial body 32, resulting in a straighter wall at the posterior end of keel cut 18 instead of an arc as would be expected from such a pivoting motion. Alternatively, the proximal end of milling guide 28 could also be straight if such an arced end is not objectionable. It will also be appreciated that the slimness and shape of system 20 also allows good visibility for the surgeon.


Depicted in FIG. 22 is an alternate design of a proximal end 66 of milling guide 28 in which a pivot element 68 with a sleeve bearing 70 therein is provided in proximal end 66 for each mill chamber 54. Sleeve bearing 70 receives the shaft of reamer 30 in order to minimize friction between milling guide 28 and reamer 30. Sleeve bearing 70 is conveniently supported by pivot elements 72 rotating around small pins (not shown) which allow a controlled sweeping motion of reamer 30.


Depicted in FIG. 23 is an alternative embodiment of a trial implant head 76 with a through hole 78 therein. Through hole 78 allows the necessary room for reamers 30, and strength of trial head 76 is not compromised since the forward part of trial head 76 is closed as shown. Through hole 78 is provided to improve the retention in trial head 76 of the cut bone material created during the reaming process.


Depicted in FIGS. 24-25 is an alternative disposable pivot element 80 similar to pivot element 68 described above. If the life span of the sleeve bearing therein (not shown) is considered too short or reuse is not desired, then pivot element 80 supporting the sleeve bearing is made disposable. The sleeve bearing and pivot element 80 would then be replaced in the milling guide after each surgery. The material used for this type of pivot element could be PEEK. A pair snap-on spring-like receiving feet 82 provided on pivoting element 80 allows pivot element 80 to be attached to and detached from pins 84 (see FIG. 22) at the rear end of the milling guide.


Alternatively, pivot element 80 could be made in different heights, such as shown by pivot element 80′ in FIG. 33 which is taller than pivot element 80 due to the height of head 86 (though alternatively, the portion below head 86 could instead be heightened). With different heights of pivot elements, the surgeon would select the height desired to position the cutting end of reamer 30 relative to where bushing 58 contacts the pivot element as needed. Such pivot elements 80′ may or may not be designed to be disposable.


Depicted in FIG. 26 is another alternative embodiment of a milling system 20′ having a pivot element 88 including an elongated tube 90 designed to provide guidance for reamer 30. Elongated tube 90 extends from the bearing/pivot portion at mounting pins 92 to the distal (forward) end of the milling guide to provide enhanced support for reamer 30 if needed or desired. As another alternative, one or more thin spacing washers 62a and/or 62b as depicted in FIG. 32 could be added as needed below bushing 58. Washers 62 are used to space bushing 58 slightly further from pivot element 88 (or from milling guide 28 in other embodiments noted above), and thus would become part of the bearing member for reamer 30 against the back end of milling guide 28. Washers 62a and 62b have different heights as shown, and one or more of each, or others of different heights, could be used as desired. Such washers would preferably slide frictionally along reamer 30 so that washers 62 would not move along reamer 30 without being positively moved, and hence would not fall off of reamer 30 accidentally.


Depicted in FIG. 27 is an alternative embodiment of a milling guide 96 for straight hole drilling or cutting. Milling guide 96 is provided as an option when it is desired to reduce the impact forces for a subsequent chiseling step used to form the keel cut as typical in the prior art. The keel cutting technique would include drilling of one or two parallel straight holes per keel using a drill 98 to remove bone before using either a wedged and/or box chisel (not shown). For this purpose, milling guide 96 includes two guide holes 100a and 100b for each keel cut location. The system shown also has an alternative adjustable stop design having two side stops 102 positioned symmetrically relative to the insertion or longitudinal axis. In order to remove more bone of the vertebral endplates, hole 102b in milling guide 96 could be angled towards the trial body as shown in FIG. 28 with milling guide 96′. If reamer 30 has a tapered/conical tip, the resulting drilled hole caused by the tapered/conical tip would be designed to be parallel to the trial surface, or at least allow for more bone removal at the proximal (forward) end of the trial body. In the figure, the surgeon would drill two holes on each side, but the two holes on each side would not be parallel.


If desired, any of the milling (or drilling) guides is stabilized or controlled with a guide handle 106 as shown in FIG. 29 (and also partially in FIG. 22). Alternatively, guide handle 106 could also be attached to a retainer or a retractor system such as the SYNFRAME® by Synthes.


If the surgeon feels comfortable with chiseling to perform the keel cut, trial implant 22 can also accommodate a guide 110 for a box chisel 112 as shown in FIG. 30. Guide 110 is mounted similarly to milling guide 28, allowing the surgeon to use either a drill or a chisel method to perform the keel cut as desired.


While the above embodiments have been depicted where an upper and lower keel slot is made in the adjacent vertebral bodies 12, there may be situations where an implant has side by side or dual (or more) keels on one (or both) sides, so that cutting of two keel slots is desired in a vertebral body 12. In such situations, it would be possible to provide a milling guide 28′ as shown in FIG. 34. Milling guide 28′ has two side by side mill chambers 54′ on the top portion, with a corresponding rear end (not shown) for accommodating a reamer 30 in each mill chamber 54′. A trial implant (not shown) which accommodates the two mill chambers with twin trial grooves would thus also be provided.


While the components described above are preferably made out of metals such as stainless steel, titanium or titanium alloy, alternatively some components could be made out of composites or polymers. In addition, this type of bone cut procedure is not limited to the cervical spine, but could be used any where in the human body and in particular it could be applied for Lumbar TDR.


Although the invention has been described in considerable detail with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that the invention is capable of numerous modifications and variations, apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. An instrument system, comprising: a trial head sized to be received in an intervertebral space;a milling guide configured to be supported relative to the trial head, said milling guide including: a milling guide body that has a proximal end and a distal end that is spaced from the proximal end along a first direction, wherein the milling guide defines a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber is elongate along the first direction, and the first and second chambers are arranged side by side with respect to each other; anda pivot element pivotally coupled to the milling guide body, the pivot element configured to pivot relative to the second chamber about a pivot axis that extends in a second direction that is substantially transverse to the first direction; anda tool configured to be at least partially received in the pivot element so as to extend through the first chamber, such that when the pivot element pivots about the pivot axis while the tool is at least partially received in the pivot element and extends through the first chamber, the tool creates a channel in a vertebra when 1) the trial head is received in the intervertebral space, and 2) the milling guide is supported relative to the trial head;wherein each of the first and second chambers is configured to receive the tool.
  • 2. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first chamber is tapered in a cranial to caudal direction.
  • 3. The instrument system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first chamber defines a cross-sectional dimension that increases along a direction from the proximal end toward the distal end.
  • 4. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said tool comprises a cutting head which is conically shaped.
  • 5. The instrument system as claimed in claim 4, wherein said trial head defines a longitudinal groove, and said longitudinal groove is configured to receive said cutting head.
  • 6. The instrument system as claimed in claim 5, wherein said longitudinal groove is larger than said cutting head to provide a repository for cut vertebra.
  • 7. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a trial implant that comprises the trial head, and an adjustable stop configured to contact at least one vertebra when said trial head is properly positioned in the intervertebral space, the adjustable stop configured to move relative to the trial head.
  • 8. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the proximal end of said milling guide body comprises a bearing mechanism that defines said pivot axis when the tool is at least partially disposed in the pivot element.
  • 9. The instrument system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said bearing mechanism is a curvature of a portion of said proximal end of said milling guide body.
  • 10. The instrument system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said bearing mechanism is a movable bearing mounted in said proximal end of said milling guide body.
  • 11. The instrument system as claimed in claim 10, wherein said movable bearing is removably mounted in said proximal end.
  • 12. The instrument system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said bearing mechanism comprises an elongate tube that extends in a direction toward said distal end, the elongated tube configured to support the tool.
  • 13. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the tool comprises a bearing member that is configured to engage a portion of the proximal end, and the proximal end is configured to define the pivot axis when the bearing member engages the portion of the proximal end so as to allow the tool to pivot about the pivot axis with respect to the milling guide body.
  • 14. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a support member configured to be connected between the trial head and the milling guide.
  • 15. The instrument system as claimed in claim 14, wherein the support member is configured to carry the trial head as the trial head is inserted into the intervertebral space.
  • 16. The instrument system as claimed in claim 14, wherein the support member is a trial body.
  • 17. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the first chamber extends through the milling guide body.
  • 18. The instrument system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the intervertebral space is defined between first and second vertebral bodies that are spaced in a cranial to caudal direction, and the second direction is further substantially transverse to the cranial to caudal direction.
  • 19. The instrument system as claimed in claim 18, further comprising a pivot pin pivotally coupling the milling guide body to the pivot element, wherein the pivot pin defines the pivot axis.
  • 20. An instrument system, comprising: a trial head sized to be received in an intervertebral space;a milling guide configured to be supported relative to the trial head, said milling guide including: a milling guide body that has a proximal end and a distal end that is spaced from the proximal end along a first direction; andan upper pivot element pivotally coupled to the milling guide body,a lower pivot element pivotally coupled to the milling guide body, the lower pivot element spaced from the upper pivot element along a second direction that is substantially transverse to the first direction,wherein each of the upper and lower pivot elements is configured to pivot relative to the milling guide body about respective upper and lower pivot axes that extend in a third direction that is substantially transverse to the first and second directions; anda tool configured to be at least partially received in at least one of said upper or lower pivot elements so as to pivot about at least one of the respective upper or lower pivot axes when the at least one of said upper or lower pivot elements pivots about the respective upper or lower pivot axis, such that the tool is configured to create a channel in a vertebra when the tool is at least partially received in the at least one of the upper or lower pivot elements and the at least one of the upper or lower pivot elements pivots about the respective upper or lower pivot axis.
  • 21. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the milling guide further comprises an upper chamber and a lower chamber that is spaced from the upper chamber along the second direction, each of the upper chamber and the lower chamber is elongate along the first direction, and each of the upper chamber and the lower chamber is configured to receive at least a portion of the tool.
  • 22. The instrument system as claimed in claim 21, wherein at least one of said upper and lower chambers is tapered in a cranial to caudal direction.
  • 23. The instrument system as claimed in claim 22, wherein said tool has a cutting head that is conically shaped.
  • 24. The instrument system as claimed in claim 23, wherein said trial head defines an upper and a lower longitudinal groove, and at least one of the upper or lower longitudinal grooves is configured to receive said cutting head.
  • 25. The instrument system as claimed in claim 24, wherein at least one of said longitudinal grooves defines a through hole that is wider than said cutting head to provide a repository for cut vertebra.
  • 26. The instrument system as claimed in claim 22, wherein each of the upper and lower chambers defines a respective cross-sectional dimension that increases along a direction from the proximal end toward the distal end.
  • 27. The instrument system as claimed in claim 21, wherein each of the upper and lower chamber extend through the milling guide body.
  • 28. The instrument system as claimed in claim 27, further comprising a lower pivot pin pivotally coupling the milling guide body to the lower pivot element, wherein the lower pivot pin defines the lower pivot axis.
  • 29. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, further comprising a trial implant that comprises the trial head, and an adjustable stop that is configured to contact at least one vertebra when said trial head is properly positioned in the intervertebral space, the adjustable stop configured to move relative to the trial head.
  • 30. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the proximal end comprises at least one bearing mechanism that is configured to define the upper or lower pivot axis when the tool is at least partially disposed in the at least one of the upper or lower pivot elements and when the portion of the tool engages the proximal end so as to allow the tool to pivot about the upper or lower pivot axis with respect to the milling guide body.
  • 31. The instrument system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the at least one bearing mechanism is a curvature of a portion of said proximal end of said milling guide body.
  • 32. The instrument system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the at least one bearing mechanism is a movable bearing mounted in said proximal end of said milling guide body.
  • 33. The instrument system as claimed in claim 32, wherein said movable bearing is removably mounted in said proximal end.
  • 34. The instrument system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the at least one bearing mechanism comprises an elongate tube that is elongate along the first direction, and the at least one bearing mechanism is configured to support the tool.
  • 35. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, further comprising a support member configured to be connected between the trial head and the milling guide.
  • 36. The instrument system as claimed in claim 35, wherein said upper and lower chambers are arranged side by side with respect to each other.
  • 37. The instrument system as claimed in claim 35, wherein the support member is configured to carry the trial head as the trial head is inserted into the intervertebral space.
  • 38. The instrument system as claimed in claim 35, wherein the support member is a trial body.
  • 39. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the tool comprises a bearing member that is configured to engage the proximal end, and the proximal end configured to define the upper or lower pivot axis when the bearing member engages the proximal end so as to allow the tool to pivot about the upper or lower pivot axis with respect to the milling guide body.
  • 40. The instrument system as claimed in claim 20, further comprising an upper pivot pin pivotally coupling the milling guide body to the upper pivot element, wherein the upper pivot pin defines the upper pivot axis.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/834,178, filed Jul. 31, 2006.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2007/074717 7/30/2007 WO 00 10/2/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2008/016872 2/7/2008 WO A
US Referenced Citations (292)
Number Name Date Kind
114816 Hiestand May 1871 A
3320951 Wittebol May 1967 A
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3510883 Cathcart May 1970 A
3579829 Sampson May 1971 A
3740769 Haboush Jun 1973 A
3875595 Froning Apr 1975 A
3903549 Deyerle Sep 1975 A
D243286 Deyerle Feb 1977 S
4021864 Waugh May 1977 A
4034746 Williams Jul 1977 A
4038897 Murray et al. Aug 1977 A
4038987 Komiya Aug 1977 A
4232404 Samuelson et al. Nov 1980 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4466429 Loscher et al. Aug 1984 A
4467802 Maslanka Aug 1984 A
4470158 Pappas et al. Sep 1984 A
4545374 Jacobson Oct 1985 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4622959 Marcus Nov 1986 A
4653487 Maale Mar 1987 A
4681589 Tronzo Jul 1987 A
4697586 Gazale Oct 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4736738 Lipovsek et al. Apr 1988 A
4743262 Tronzo May 1988 A
4759766 Buttner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4770661 Oh Sep 1988 A
4805607 Engelhardt et al. Feb 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4874389 Downey Oct 1989 A
4875474 Border Oct 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
4892545 Day et al. Jan 1990 A
4898161 Grundei Feb 1990 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4936863 Hoffmann Jun 1990 A
4946378 Hirayama et al. Aug 1990 A
4997432 Keller Mar 1991 A
5002576 Fuhrmann et al. Mar 1991 A
5004476 Cook Apr 1991 A
5035716 Downey Jul 1991 A
5037438 Davidson Aug 1991 A
5062850 MacMillan et al. Nov 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5108442 Smith Apr 1992 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5171280 Baumgartner Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5211645 Baumgartner et al. May 1993 A
5228455 Barcel Jul 1993 A
5236460 Barber Aug 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5271737 Baldwin et al. Dec 1993 A
5282868 Bahler Feb 1994 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5306308 Gross et al. Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5314477 Marnay May 1994 A
5326366 Pascarella et al. Jul 1994 A
5336232 Green et al. Aug 1994 A
5344458 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5364397 Hayes et al. Nov 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5383888 Zvenyatsky et al. Jan 1995 A
5395317 Kambin Mar 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5409492 Jones et al. Apr 1995 A
5423825 Levine Jun 1995 A
5425773 Boyd et al. Jun 1995 A
5431658 Moskovich Jul 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5458641 Ramirez Jimenez Oct 1995 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5501654 Failla et al. Mar 1996 A
5505732 Michelson Apr 1996 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5509934 Cohen Apr 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5534029 Shima Jul 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5556431 Buttner-Janz et al. Sep 1996 A
5562736 Ray et al. Oct 1996 A
5562738 Boyd et al. Oct 1996 A
5571109 Bertagnoli Nov 1996 A
5591235 Kuslich Jan 1997 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5658347 Sarkisian et al. Aug 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5702469 Whipple et al. Dec 1997 A
5702486 Craig et al. Dec 1997 A
5716415 Steffee Feb 1998 A
5720751 Jackson Feb 1998 A
5722977 Wilhelmy Mar 1998 A
5755798 Papavero et al. May 1998 A
5755811 Tanamal et al. May 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5782830 Farris Jul 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5800547 Schafer et al. Sep 1998 A
5824094 Serhan et al. Oct 1998 A
D401335 Koros et al. Nov 1998 S
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5885299 Winslow et al. Mar 1999 A
5885300 Tokuhashi et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5895428 Berry Apr 1999 A
5897593 Kohrs et al. Apr 1999 A
5899901 Middleton May 1999 A
5899941 Nishijima et al. May 1999 A
5951564 Schroder et al. Sep 1999 A
6006174 Lin et al. Dec 1999 A
6010502 Bagby Jan 2000 A
6017342 Rinner Jan 2000 A
6033405 Winslow et al. Mar 2000 A
6036692 Burel et al. Mar 2000 A
6042582 Ray et al. Mar 2000 A
6059790 Sand et al. May 2000 A
6063088 Winslow May 2000 A
6063121 Xavier et al. May 2000 A
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6083225 Winslow et al. Jul 2000 A
6086595 Yonemura et al. Jul 2000 A
6096038 Michelson Aug 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6102950 Vaccaro Aug 2000 A
6102954 Albrektsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6110179 Flivik et al. Aug 2000 A
6113602 Sand Sep 2000 A
6113637 Gill et al. Sep 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6117174 Nolan Sep 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6126674 Janzen Oct 2000 A
6146421 Gordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6156040 Yonemura et al. Dec 2000 A
6159215 Urbahns et al. Dec 2000 A
6171339 Houfburg et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6224599 Baynham et al. May 2001 B1
6238414 Griffiths May 2001 B1
6241769 Nicholson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251140 Marino et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261296 Aebi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264655 Pisharodi Jul 2001 B1
6270498 Michelson Aug 2001 B1
6296647 Robioneck et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309421 Pisharodi Oct 2001 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368351 Glenn et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368353 Truscott Apr 2002 B1
6402785 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6436098 Michelson Aug 2002 B1
6436139 Shapiro et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440142 Ralph et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440168 Cauthen Aug 2002 B1
6440169 Elberg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447547 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6478800 Fraser et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478801 Ralph et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478823 Michelson Nov 2002 B1
6500206 Bryan Dec 2002 B1
6517544 Michelson Feb 2003 B1
6524318 Longhini et al. Feb 2003 B1
6558424 Thalgott May 2003 B2
6565574 Michelson May 2003 B2
6595995 Zdelblick et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6610065 Branch et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613091 Zdelblick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626943 Eberlein et al. Sep 2003 B2
6635060 Hanson et al. Oct 2003 B2
6641582 Hanson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6641614 Wagner et al. Nov 2003 B1
6652533 O'Neil Nov 2003 B2
6652534 Zucherman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6679886 Weikel et al. Jan 2004 B2
6712819 Zucherman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712825 Aebi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6733505 Li May 2004 B2
6740118 Eisermann May 2004 B2
6746454 Winterbottom et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755841 Fraser et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770074 Michelson Aug 2004 B2
6824565 Muhanna et al. Nov 2004 B2
6875213 Michelson Apr 2005 B2
6896676 Zubok et al. May 2005 B2
6936071 Marnay et al. Aug 2005 B1
6964687 Bernerd et al. Nov 2005 B1
6966912 Michelson Nov 2005 B2
7037340 Gau May 2006 B2
7048766 Ferree May 2006 B2
7081120 Li et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083649 Zucherman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7118500 Beyersdorff et al. Oct 2006 B2
7118580 Beyersdorff et al. Oct 2006 B1
7169182 Errico et al. Jan 2007 B2
7204852 Marnay et al. Apr 2007 B2
7238203 Bagga et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252673 Lim Aug 2007 B2
7491204 Marnay Feb 2009 B2
7547309 Bertagnoli et al. Jun 2009 B2
7575576 Zubok et al. Aug 2009 B2
7641692 Bryan et al. Jan 2010 B2
7766914 McCormack et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803162 Marnay et al. Sep 2010 B2
7811325 Cannon et al. Oct 2010 B2
8025684 Garcia-Bengochea et al. Sep 2011 B2
20010010002 Michelson Jul 2001 A1
20020016633 Lin et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020049497 Mason Apr 2002 A1
20020065558 Varga et al. May 2002 A1
20020072752 Zucherman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077702 Castro Jun 2002 A1
20020091392 Michelson Jul 2002 A1
20020099377 Zucherman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111679 Zucherman et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120259 Lettice et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165612 Gerber et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030028197 Hanson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032962 McGahan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045884 Robie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055434 O'Neil Mar 2003 A1
20030069586 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083747 Winterbottom et al. May 2003 A1
20030135275 Garcia et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030171756 Fallin et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191534 Viart et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195631 Ferree Oct 2003 A1
20030208273 Eisermann et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233097 Ferree Dec 2003 A1
20030233145 Landry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002758 Landry et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010316 Williams et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024462 Ferree et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030387 Landry et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040097929 Branch et al. May 2004 A1
20040117022 Marnay et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133278 Marino et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162563 Michelson Aug 2004 A1
20040172133 Gerber et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176777 Zubok et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040215198 Marnay et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225295 Zubok et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225366 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050021042 Marnay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021145 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021146 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043740 Haid, Jr. et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043802 Eisermann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060035 Errico et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050143747 Zubok et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143749 Zalenski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050159818 Blain Jul 2005 A1
20050159819 McCormack et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165408 Puno et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050228500 Kim et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246022 Zubok et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251260 Gerber et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261769 Moskowitz et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267581 Marnay et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060030856 Drewry et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060030860 Peterman Feb 2006 A1
20060036326 Baumgartner et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041313 Allard et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060064100 Bertagnoli et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060089656 Allard et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100633 Michelson May 2006 A1
20060116769 Marnay et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149273 Ross et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060217809 Albert et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241641 Albans et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070016221 Beyersdorff et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070162134 Marnay Jul 2007 A1
20070198089 Moskowitz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208345 Marnay et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070208346 Marnay et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225812 Gill Sep 2007 A1
20080228275 Cannon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090069894 Duggal et al. Mar 2009 A1
20100324690 Cannon et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110295374 Bryan et al. Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
624 573 Aug 1981 CH
1805720 Jul 2006 CN
101027005 Aug 2007 CN
101631517 Jan 2010 CN
2263842 Jul 1974 DE
2804936 Aug 1979 DE
3023353 Apr 1981 DE
3526742 Jan 1987 DE
4328690 Mar 1995 DE
29916078 Nov 1999 DE
0077159 Apr 1983 EP
0471821 Feb 1992 EP
0333990 Jul 1993 EP
0770367 May 1997 EP
0712607 Feb 2002 EP
1793749 Jun 2007 EP
2120799 Nov 2009 EP
2718635 Oct 1995 FR
2724108 Mar 1996 FR
2737656 Feb 1997 FR
2742653 Jun 1997 FR
2795945 Jan 2001 FR
2-261446 Oct 1990 JP
2010-521244 Jun 2010 JP
WO 9113598 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9834552 Aug 1998 WO
WO 0101893 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0119295 Mar 2001 WO
WO 02071986 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03053290 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2004019828 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004098380 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005051243 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005053580 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005055835 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005099593 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2006033067 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2006036580 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2008112956 Sep 2008 WO
200905900 May 2010 ZA
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100076443 A1 Mar 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60834178 Jul 2006 US