The present invention relates to a drive device for a flap of an article of furniture having at least one actuating arm which is or can be acted upon by a spring device for moving the flap, and an ejector device by way of which the flap is movable over a first opening angle range from the closed position in the direction of the open position.
The invention further concerns an article of furniture having a drive device of the kind to be described.
Such a drive device is known, for example, from German Utility Model specification DE 20 2006 000 535 U1, wherein there is provided an ejector device having a Touch-latch functionality for ejecting the flap from a closed end position. There is also an additional spring device which provides compensation for the weight of the flap. The spring device, however, also applies to the flap a relatively high force for holding the flap closed so that towards the end of the closing movement, after moving beyond a dead center point position, the flap is pushed towards the fully closed position and is held in that end position by a given closing force. A disadvantage with that state of the art is the fact that the ejector device—when the flap in the completely closed position—has to overcome the force of the spring device, and that also requires an ejector device of relatively great dimensions.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a drive device of the general kind set forth above, avoiding the above-mentioned disadvantage.
According to the invention, an advantageous configuration is achieved in that the spring device exerts substantially no force on the flap in the first opening angle range, and the spring device moves the flap in the opening direction only in a second opening angle range. The second opening angle range adjoins the first opening angle range or at most somewhat overlaps therewith.
In other words, the ejector device and the spring device are matched to each other so that in the closed position, the spring device exerts substantially no force on the flap so that the ejector device, for ejection of the flap, has to overcome substantially only the moment of inertia of the flap (having regard to the angular speed to be achieved by the flap). The flap can thus be particularly easily moved out of the closed end position.
The force of the ejector device can be relatively low in that way, and it can thus be of a space-saving and inexpensive implementation. It is only towards the end of the ejection stroke movement of the ejector device—preferably subsequently to that ejection stroke movement—that the spring device begins to act so that an active pivotal moment is exerted in the opening direction on the actuating arm (and thus on the flap pivotably connected thereto) so that the flap is moved automatically upwardly by the force of the spring device.
In one embodiment, the drive device has precisely one spring device. In principle, it is admittedly conceivable that the drive device could include two or more spring devices which however are all operative in the second opening angle range (for example in the form of a relay race). In an aspect of the invention, however, it is desirable if the spring device or devices exerts or exert no pulling closure force on the flap in the first opening angle range or does not provide any spring force which holds the flap in the completely closed position.
In another embodiment of the invention, adjoining the second opening angle range is a third opening angle range in which the spring device holds the flap in a substantially balanced relationship. In that way, the flap is held substantially in any open position in a range immediately prior to the completely open position, whereby the flap is not necessarily pushed towards the fully open position. It will be noted, however, that it is also possible for the flap to be moved into the fully open position by the spring device, and a damping device can be provided for damping the last opening movement of the flap.
In another possible embodiment of the invention, the first opening angle range—starting from the completely closed position of the flap—can extend between 0° and 10°, preferably between 0° and 5°. It may also be desirable if the second opening angle range is operative up to about 30°, preferably about 10°, in the open position of the flap.
An advantageous configuration is afforded if a control cam mounted about an axis of rotation and with an actuating contour formed or arranged thereon is operative between the spring device and the actuating arm, and a pressure roller runs against the actuating contour during the pivotal movement of the actuating arm. In that connection, it may be advantageous if the curve portion of the actuating contour—which is in engagement with the pressure roller during the first opening angle range of the flap—has at least approximately the same radial spacing relative to the axis of rotation of the control cam (i.e., has an approximately uniform radius). The approximately equal radial spacing of that cam portion (i.e., uniform radius) makes it possible to avoid the spring device exerting a substantial force on the flap in the very last closing range. It would at most even be possible to tolerate a slight closing force on the part of the spring device as long as the opposite force of the ejector device is correspondingly greater.
To achieve a particularly compact structure it may be desirable if the spring device and the ejector device are arranged in a common structural unit. It will be appreciated that it is also possible for the spring device and the drive device to be arranged in mutually separate structural units. In that way, existing actuating drives can possibly be subsequently fitted with an ejector device.
The ejector device can act directly or indirectly on the flap. Alternatively or supplementally, however, it is also possible for the ejector device to act on the actuating arm. In a desirable configuration, it can be provided that the ejector device has at least one, preferably lockable, force storage means, by which an ejector element can be acted upon for ejection of the flap and/or for ejection of the actuating arm.
There are a number of possible options for implementing the ejector device. In this connection, all Touch-latch functionalities known from the state of the art can be considered, as is also described inter alia in DE 20 2006 000 535 U1 to the present applicant. The force storage means can therefore have at least one mechanical spring element and/or can be at least partially formed by an electric motor. Force storage means in the form of gas pressure springs and/or a solenoid can also be envisaged. The force storage means can be loaded up upon opening or upon closing, in which case the Touch-latch fitment can be triggered by pulling on the flap and/or by manually exerting pressure on the flap (starting from the closed position). In the case of triggering by exerting pressure on the flap, it may be desirable if the flap has a first end position which corresponds to the closed position of the flap and that the flap, starting from that first end position, is movable by exerting pressure in the closing direction thereof into a second end position closer to the furniture carcass.
So that the flap is sufficiently stably held relative to the furniture carcass in the completely closed position, it may be desirable if the flap is held in the closed position by a restraining device. Thus, there can be a per se known structure, wherein the restraining device includes at least two portions. A first portion can be arranged on the furniture carcass, and a second portion can be arranged on the flap, and the two portions exert a magnetic attraction force on each other in the closed position of the flap.
Alternatively, a pull-in device can also be used as the restraining device, as have for example already long been known in relation to drawer extension guide arrangements. As an example in that respect, attention is to be directed to EP 0 391 221 B1 to the present applicant. Those pull-in devices usually have at least one coupling portion, wherein a coupling portion associated with the furniture carcass can be coupled to an entrainment member associated with the flap towards the end of the flap closing movement, whereupon the coupled entrainment member (and therewith the flap) can be pulled into the completely closed position by a force storage device. It will be appreciated that the closing movement can also be damped by a damper to prevent the flap from hitting hard against the furniture carcass.
The restraining device can, in principle, also be in the form of a simple locking device which can be released again by the ejector device. It will be appreciated that in all variants of the restraining device, the force of the ejector device, in opposition to the restraining device, must be sufficiently higher to permit the flap to be reliably ejected from the closed end position.
Further details and advantages of the present invention will now be described with reference to the specific description and drawings. In the drawings:
It is also possible to see in
The present invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiment, and includes or extends to all variants and technical equivalents which can fall within the scope of the claims appended hereto. The positional references adopted in the description such as for example up, down, right and so forth are related to the directly described and illustrated Figure and are to be appropriately transferred to the new position upon a change in position.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1347/2008 | Aug 2008 | AT | national |
This application is a Continuation of International application No. PCT/AT2009/000290, filed Jul. 28, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3376088 | Bol et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
7178202 | Hirtsiefer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7240974 | Hirtsiefer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7562757 | Dubach et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7887147 | Karg | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8029078 | Gasser | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8066341 | Brustle | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8109583 | Bruestle | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8282175 | Herper et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8360537 | Gasser | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376420 | Peterlunger | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20070180654 | Gasser | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080048538 | Karg | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080100189 | Huber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121490 | Dubach et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122332 | Brustle | May 2008 | A1 |
20090064457 | Brustle | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100162847 | Gassner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110131884 | Herper et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120161598 | Blum | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2004 007168 | Sep 2004 | DE |
20 2006 000535 | Apr 2006 | DE |
201 22 712 | May 2007 | DE |
0 391 221 | Sep 1995 | EP |
1 148 200 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1 296 011 | Jun 2009 | EP |
1 835 107 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1 840 309 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2007101287 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008022673 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098267 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of DE202006000535 (BLUM), retrieved on Nov. 19, 2012, www.espacenet.com. |
International Search Report issued Oct. 30, 2009 in International (PCT) Application No. PCT/AT2009/000290. |
Austrian Patent Office Search Report dated Jun. 17, 2009 in Austrian Patent Application No. A 1347/2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110138960 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AT2009/000290 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13033955 | US |