Patent Application
20160227927
The invention concerns a drive device for a movable furniture part, comprising a force-actuated ejection element for ejecting the movable furniture part from a closed position into an open position and a locking device for locking the ejection element in a locking position, wherein the locking device comprises a control element, which is connected to the ejection element, and a sliding guide path for the control element. Moreover, the invention concerns an article of furniture with a furniture carcass, a movable furniture part movably mounted to the furniture carcass and such a drive device.
Since many years miscellaneous drive devices are produced in the industry of furniture fittings. Opening and/or closing movements of the movable furniture part (drawer, flap, door) are assisted or automatically effected respectively with these drive devices. Particularly known are so-called Touch Latch mechanisms, where an unlocking occurs by pressing onto the movable furniture part, whereupon the drive or ejection device opens the movable furniture part.
Lockable control elements guided in a sliding guide path are particularly suitable for such mechanisms. Mostly, these sliding guide paths are of a heart curve-shape or do have a heart curve-shaped section in which the control element is held or locked in a locking position of the locking device. By over-pressing the movable furniture part in an over-pressing position located behind the closed position, the control element is disengaged from this locking position (latching recess), whereupon the force-actuated ejection element can move freely and ejects the movable furniture part into the opening direction.
Besides the purely mechanical or functional requirements for such drive devices, the requirements regarding the operator convenience and the ease of use are increasing in recent times. There, an import aspect is also the noise development which is pretty high in numerous currently known drive devices. Among other things this is ascribed to the fairly high acting forces and also to the play between the moving components. The source for the noise development among other things is the touching or strong bumping of the control element on the sliding guide path, especially on the sidewalls of the sliding guide path.
Now the object of the present invention is to provide an improved drive device in relation to the state of the art. Particularly, the noise development should be reduced.
That object is attained by a drive device with the features of claim 1. Thus, according to the invention it is provided that the sliding guide path—outside an optionally present latch recess—has differently hard sidewall regions in certain areas. Theses differently hard sidewall regions are enabling to implement the sliding guide path in such a way that those sidewall regions are provided with an appropriate different hardness or surface design, where a particularly high noise development is determined in the area of the sliding guide path.
There are indeed publications which show a resilient latch recess, for example the resilient leg of the spring element in the latch recess region of the DE 10 2011 002 212 A1 or the resilient stopping element as a part of the latch recess of the CA 2 743 055 A1. This resilience, however, solely serves to enable an unlocking by pulling into opening direction and not for preventing noise emergence. In contrast, the sliding guide path of the drive device according to the invention comprises—expressed in other words—in certain areas differently hard sidewall regions, wherein, if the sliding guide path comprises a latch recess, these differently hard sidewall are provided outside of this latch recess.
Particularly preferred it can be provided that the sliding guide path has at least one hard sidewall region and at least one soft sidewall region. Thus, the soft sidewall region serves as a stop for the control element in the particularly stressed or noise-prone sections. These sections are especially found where the sliding guide path has a large guiding function for the control element. In the other sections where only a small guiding function is necessary—this means where the control element by itself without guiding moves almost exactly along the sliding guide path—the sidewall region can be formed hard.
The whole sliding guide path can be composed of different parts. It can also be present as a separate component of the drive device. Particularly preferred it can be provided that the sliding guide path is provided in a carrier made of plastic, preferably made of polycaprolactam, wherein the sidewall regions are at least partly made of the material of the carrier itself. Particularly preferred the plastic of the carrier is an injection-molded part. As an alternative to the production out of polycaprolactam this carrier can also consist of comparable thermoplastics or semi-crystalline thermoplastics. Also plastic composites are possible.
For establishing the soft sidewall regions in principle two variants can be used. These variants can also be present mixed in a single sliding guide path. Thus, according to the first variant it can be provided that the of the sidewall region itself is softer and therefore more resilient. This is so to speak a “material-based” variant for establishing a soft sidewall region. There is, however, also the possibility of “geometrically” establishing a softer sidewall region. In this case the material itself does not have to be softer than for example in the hard sidewall regions, but the sidewall is resilient by a thinner formation of the sidewall and therefore the sidewall is “soft” and also formed resilient when impacting on the side element.
According to a first embodiment it is provided that the at least one soft sidewall region is made of a rubber-elastic material, preferably an elastomer. Particularly preferred a thermoplastic polyurethane is used. Also material composites are possible. Particularly preferred it is provided that the at last one soft sidewall region is formed as an overlay which is separate from the carrier. This means that this overlay is attached as a separate component to the carrier and forms the sliding guide path. Especially it can be provided that the at least one soft sidewall region has a hardness between 40 and 95 shore type A, preferably between 70 and 80 shore type A. In a test procedure in conformity with the DIN ISO 7619-1 a hardness of 78 shore type A was determined when testing thermoplastic polyurethane. This hardness is the mechanical resistance which is opposed by a material to a harder testing specimen. In other words this hardness is the mechanical resistance which is opposed by the sliding guide path to the mechanical impact of the control element.
For the second embodiment it is preferably provided that the at least one soft sidewall region is formed thin-walled with a wall thickness below 0.6 mm, preferably between 0.5 mm and 0.3 mm. On the side of this soft sidewall region averted from the sliding guide path a clearance or a recess is arranged. The thin sidewall is pushed or bent into this clearance in the case of an impact of the control element. This clearance is preferably provided elongated and substantially parallel to the surface of the sliding guide path in this soft sidewall region. By this thinner formation of the sidewall, not the material itself is formed softer, but this thin region yields upon an impact of the control element and prevents noise development by the deformation. For enabling a simpler production it is preferably provided that the at least one thin-walled and soft sidewall region is formed in one piece with the carrier.
Basically, the carrier is made of a harder material than the overlay. The hardness of this carrier can be better expressed via the elastic modulus than via a shore value. Therefore, it is preferably provided that the carrier has an elastic modulus between 1,000 and 20,000 MPa, preferably between 4,000 and 6,000 MPa. Preferably the elastic modulus is around 5,000 MPa. The carrier itself can, however, comprise differently hard or elastic regions. Basically it has also to be mentioned that the whole sliding guide path can comprise most diverse kinds and dimensions of elastic modules or hardnesses respectively. Only two different kinds are preferably provided, that is to say a hard section with hard sidewall regions, wherein the elastic modulus is the same in all of these hard sidewall regions. Secondly, a soft sidewall region is provided. Preferably, the shore hardness is the same in all soft sidewall regions made of a rubber-elastic material. In contrast, the also soft but thin-walled sidewall regions preferably comprise the same elastic modulus as the hard sidewall regions, but are formed resilient or elastic due to their geometry. However, these two kinds of soft sidewall regions have in common that the deformation of the soft sidewall region is larger than the deformation of the hard sidewall region in the case of the same impact velocity upon the sidewall. Thus, the soft sidewall region forms a crumple zone upon the impact of the control element. The deformation can be differently within the soft sidewall regions which are differently formed and arranged on different positions. It is substantial that the deformation in each soft sidewall region is always larger than in the hard sidewall regions. Of course provided that there are the same impact velocity and at least a similar impact angle of the control element. With other words the same force impact of the control element effects a smaller deformation in the hard sidewall region than in the soft sidewall region.
Depending on the exact configuration of the whole sliding guide path most diverse path sections can be provided with a soft sidewall region. As already indicated, it is preferably provided that the sliding guide path has deflection areas and impact areas for the control element, wherein the at least one soft sidewall region is provided in these deflection areas or impact areas. These deflection areas or impact areas can especially be found where a high spring force of the control element is acting lateral onto the sidewall of the sliding guide path. In contrast, there are areas in which the force of the control element is acting substantially parallel to the sidewall, so that at most frictional forces occur between the control element and the sidewall. In these areas it is not necessary to configure the sidewall particularly soft.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention it can be provided that that the sliding guide path has a latch recess, wherein the control element abuts the latch recess in the locking position of the locking device. Basically, the sliding guide path can of course have a soft sidewall region in this latch recess. However, according to the invention the sliding guide path has differently hard sidewall regions outside this latch recess.
Furthermore, it can preferably be provided that the sliding guide path for the control element comprises a latching section formed by the latch recess, an over-pressing section with a deviating slant, an ejecting section, a shifting section, a bearing section and a tensioning section. Usually no high noise developments are to be feared in the over-pressing section and in the ejecting section. However, such noise developments can occur in the shifting section, in which a shift of the control element between the ejecting section and the tensioning section takes place. Also in a bearing section, in which the control element is held when the movable furniture part is located in freewheel, noise developments can occur when impacting. This can also occur in the tensioning section due to the bent form of the sliding guide path. Thus, it is preferably provided that only the shifting section, the bearing section and the tensioning section have at least one soft sidewall region. This is of an advantage especially because in these sections the deflection areas and the impact areas respectively for the control element are located.
Generally, it can be provided that the ejection element is mounted linearly displaceable at the carrier, wherein the ejection element is force-actuated by an ejection force storage means, preferably a tension spring, which is on the one hand fixed to the carrier and on the other hand fixed to the ejection element.
For a simple possibility to move the control element it is preferably provided that the, preferably peg-formed, control element is arranged on a control lever which is mounted movably, preferably pivotable, to the ejection element.
Further, it is preferably provided that the locking device is unlockable by over-pressing the movable furniture part in an over-pressed position, the over-pressed position (US) being located behind the closed position. Of course, a triggering can also be effected by means of pulling the movable furniture part. However, it is preferably provided that there is no unlocking when pulling the movable furniture part, but the movable furniture part can be simply pulled in opening direction without unlocking the locking device.
In order to not just enable an automatic opening movement a retracting device for retracting the movable furniture part from an open position in closing direction into the closed position is preferably provided, the retracting device preferably being damped by a damping device.
Protection is also claimed for an article of furniture with a furniture carcass, a movable furniture part movably mounted to the furniture carcass and a drive device according to the invention. Here it can be provided that the drive device is associated with the furniture carcass and is acting onto an entrainment member, which is arranged on the movable furniture part, or directly onto the movable furniture part. However, preferably it is provided that the drive device is associated with the movable furniture part and ejects itself from the furniture carcass or from an entrainment member which is fixed to the furniture carcass.
Further details and advantages of the present invention are described more fully hereinafter by means of the specific description with reference to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, in which:
The drive device 1 is fixed via the carrier 10 to the movable furniture part 2 shown at the top and to its drawer rail 22 respectively. The sliding guide path 6 is formed in the carrier 10 and forms together with the control element 5 the locking device 4 for the ejection element 3. The ejection element 3, in turn, can be coupled via the entrainment member 10 to the carcass rail 23 and the furniture carcass respectively. The topmost drawer is located in an open position OS. At the same time the ejection force storage means 13 (in this case a compression spring) relaxes and the ejection element 3 is not locked via the control element 5 in the latching section R of the sliding guide path 6. Rather, the control element 5 is located in a section averted from the latching section R.
If now moving the movable furniture part 2 from this open position OS into closing direction SR (see second drawer from above), so the ejection force storage means 13 is tensioned due to the manual force onto the movable furniture part 2 using the coupling of the ejection element 3 with the entrainment member 19, whereby the control element 5 is moved into the latching section R. Thereby, the locking device 4 is located in the locking position V. This is not apparent from this schematic drawing, but can be comprehend from the later following drawings.
As soon as this locking position V is reached, the only schematically indicated retraction device 16 together with the damping device 15 retracts the movable furniture part 2 into the closed position SS (see third drawer from above). Also in this closed position SS the locking device 4 is locked in the locking position V.
If then, according to the fourth drawer from above, manually pressing onto the movable furniture part 2, the movable furniture part 2 reaches an over-pressed position US located behind the closed position SS, in which unlocking of the locking device 4 occurs. Thereby, the ejection force storage means 13 can relax and the movable furniture part 2 is ejected into opening direction OR, so that the open position OS according to the topmost drawer is reached.
A specific embodiment of a drive device 1 is shown in the explosion views according to the
As can already be seen well in the
The essential sections of the sliding guide path 6 are illustrated in
Apposite to
In
Summarizing, the present invention thus is about the noise damping in a heart curve (sliding guide path 6) of a Touch Latch-mechanism (drive device 1). Function load shifts or switch points of the control peg (control element 5) occur within the heart curve during the opening and closing movements of a furniture fitting with an ejection. All of these points in a heart curve lead to more or less loud noises. In order to prevent or reduce these noises, these points in the heart curve are formed by soft parts and damping elements respectively (soft sidewall regions 9) or by specifically formed wall thicknesses which allow a yielding.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| A 824/2013 | Oct 2013 | AT | national |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/AT2014/000189 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Child | 15134785 | US |
