The invention concerns a drive device for a moveable furniture part comprising a lockable ejection device for ejection of the moveable furniture part from a closed position into an open position, wherein the ejection device can be unlocked by over-pressing of the moveable furniture part into an over-pressing position which is behind the closed position in the closing direction, wherein an over-pressing region is between the closed position and the over-pressing position, and a damping device for damping the closing movement of the moveable furniture part. The invention further concerns an article of furniture having such a drive device.
Drive devices have already been known for many years in the furniture fitting industry, with which by pressing against a moveable furniture part (for example a draw) unlocking of that moveable furniture part from the furniture carcass takes place and then the moveable furniture part is opened or actively ejected. For that purpose such drive devices have a so-called touch latch mechanism. With that mechanism the movement for closing the drawer from the open position and the movement for unlocking or opening the drawer from the closed position are in the same direction, namely in the closing direction. In the case of normal soft closure (manually or by a retraction device) the drawer or the moveable furniture part is held at the end of the closing movement in the closed position by a locking device. If however the drawer is pushed shut excessively firmly or if it is pushed through as far as an end abutment (this corresponds to the over-pressing position) the ejection device can no longer lock at all or is immediately triggered again, whereby there is no guarantee of the drawer being securely closed in the event of such incorrect operation of the moveable furniture part.
To resolve that problem a blocking element is known from Austrian patent application A 52/2012 which is of earlier priority date but which is not a prior publication in order to prevent the movement into the over-pressing position in the event of excessively fast closing movement.
The object of the present invention is to provide an alternative possible way of preventing the moveable furniture part from being pushed through as far as the end abutment or into the over-pressing position and thus immediate triggering of the ejection device.
That object is attained by a drive device having the features of claim 1. Accordingly it is provided that the damping device has a displacement-dependent damping action, wherein the damping force in a main damping region which is disposed in front of the closed position—as viewed in the opening direction—is higher than in the over-pressing region. Thus the movement of the moveable furniture part is strongly inhibited or braked by the damping device immediately before reaching the closed position, whereby the attainment of the closed position is simulated for an operator who is trying to move the moveable furniture part into the closed position with a high level of force that he applies. As a result the operator no longer continues to press against the moveable furniture part and thus unwanted and immediate re-triggering of the ejection device is prevented.
In principle it is to be noted that the damping force of the damping device is dependent on the closing speed of the moveable furniture part. The weight of the moveable furniture part (with load) and the damping length of the damping device have an additional influence on the action of the damping device. The damping device automatically levels itself, that is to say the higher the closing speed or the weight of the moveable furniture part, the correspondingly higher is the damping force of the damping device. At a low closing speed, only a little damping force has to be applied. Preferably the damping devices are so designed that, in the case of a moveable furniture part loaded with 40 kg, at a closing speed of 0.4 m/s and with a damping length (cylinder size) of 26 mm, the moveable furniture part is braked to 0 m/s—without hitting against the end of the damping device—. The damping force which can be measured or determined in the damping device is specified in this application in Newtons (abbreviation: N).
In a preferred embodiment of the invention it is accordingly provided that in the main damping region the damping force at a closing speed of 0.4 m/s is at least 35 N, preferably between 45 N and 130 N. The attainment of the closed position in the event of undesirable over-pressing can be imitated by that relatively high damping force in contrast to previously known damping devices for drive devices of moveable furniture parts.
In order however not to prevent the desired unlocking or ejection of the drive device it is preferably provided that in the over-pressing region the damping force at a closing speed of 0.4 m/s is between 0 N and 5 N. Expressed as a relative comparison it can be provided that the damping force in the main damping region is at least five times, preferably at least twelve times, the damping force in the over-pressing region.
For a soft damping operation which is as uniform as possible it is preferably provided that in the closing direction a pre-damping region is in front of the main damping region, the damping force in the main damping region being higher than in the pre-damping region. Particularly preferably in that case in the pre-damping region the damping force at a closing speed of 0.4 m/s is between 5 N and 35 N. In that case as a relative indication it can be provided that the damping force in the main damping region is higher than in the pre-damping region by at least 50%, preferably by at least 100%.
In addition to provide a gentle transition between the individual damping regions it is preferably provided that the pre-damping region, the main damping region and the over-pressing region directly adjoin each other.
In principle the main damping region can be at any location before the closed position. In order however to imitate the attainment of the closed position as exactly as possible it is preferably provided that the main damping region ends shortly (between about 1 and 15 mm) before or precisely in the closed position.
As an alternative to the definition of the main damping region by way of the Newton units it can also be provided that the damping device reduces the closing movement of the moveable furniture part in the main damping region before reaching the closed position to a speed of below 0.3 mm/second, preferably to below 0.1 mm/sec. It will be appreciated that that speed specification is heavily dependent on the previous closing speed and the weight of the moveable furniture part. Ideally, with a load in the moveable furniture part of 40 kg and with a closing speed of 0.4 m/s that speed reduction should be achieved by the end of the main damping region.
It is possible to use in principle damping devices of various lengths. It is preferably provided however that the main damping region is at a maximum 30 mm, preferably between 15 mm and 20 mm, in length.
To make an operator in the event of incorrect operation sufficiently attentive to the attainment of the—imitated—closed position, it is preferably provided that in the main damping region the damping device damps the closing movement to a speed of below 0.3 mm/second for at least five seconds.
In principle different kinds of damping devices can be used like for example a rotational damper or the like. It is preferably provided however that the damping device has a damping cylinder filled with a damping medium and a damping piston supported moveably in the damping cylinder. To attain the high damping force in the main damping region it is preferably provided that the damping cylinder at an inner surface has a constriction which forms the main damping region.
It can also happen that, by virtue of the high weight and/or by virtue of the high closing speed, even the maximum damping force of the damping device is exceeded in the main damping region. In order in that case to prevent damage in the damping device it is preferably provided that the damping device has an overload protection mechanism. By way of example attention is directed for such overload protection mechanisms in damping devices to AT 12633 U1 and WO 03/081077 A1.
Preferably it is generally provided that the individual damping regions (pre-damping region, main damping region and over-pressing region) are integrated in a single damping unit. The possibility should not also be excluded however that the damping device has two damping units operating at least partially in parallel, preferably in the form of piston-cylinder units, wherein the main damping region is provided in only one of those damping units. That could be appropriate in particular when an existing drive device is to be retro-fitted. More specifically in that case only one further damping unit which has the main damping region would have to be added to the existing damping unit.
Besides an automatic ejection device the described device can also have a retraction device for retraction of the moveable furniture part from an open position into the closed position. In that respect it is preferably provided that the retraction movement triggered by the retraction device can be damped by the damping device. In a normal retraction process the retraction device in that case overcomes the main damping region and moves the entire drive device into the “true” closed position.
Protection is also claimed for an article of furniture as set forth in claim 20. In general in that arrangement the drive device can be arranged on the furniture carcass and can actively eject the moveable furniture part. Conversely the drive device can also be connected to the moveable furniture part and can push itself away against the furniture carcass. The damping device itself does not have to be arranged in the same region as the ejection device. Rather the damping device can act separately between the furniture carcass and the moveable furniture part. Preferably the damping device is fixed to the extension guide means and damps the movement of the drawer rail relative to the carcass rail. Particularly preferably the damping device can be part of a retraction device which in turn can be separate from the ejection device. Basically it is important that the damping device is arranged anywhere in the region of the moveable furniture part in such a way that the main damping region damps the closing movement of the moveable furniture part shortly before reaching the closed position.
Further details and advantages of the present invention will be described more fully hereinafter by means of the specific description with reference to the embodiments by way of example illustrated in the drawings in which:
The essential components of the drive device 1 are the lockable ejection device 3 and the damping device 4. As shown in
As shown in
In detail in that respect attention is to be directed to
In comparison in
After that main damping region H has been passed over the position shown in
Referring to
Thus the present invention describes a drive device 1 in which travel-dependent damping provides that, in a region before the closed position SS is reached, the damping force D of the damping device 4 is increased so greatly that the attainment of the closed position is simulated for an operator in the event of incorrect operation, thereby providing an alternative kind of over-pressing protection.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 294/2013 | Apr 2013 | AT | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AT2014/000061 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14848613 | US |