The present invention relates to a drive for a movable furniture part, comprising a motor to drive the movable furniture part and a control or regulation unit to control or regulate the motor, wherein the control or regulation unit is designed in such a way that it has a threshold value and if this value is exceeded, this actuates the driving of the movable furniture part by the motor.
A drive of this type is disclosed for example from EP 1 374 732 A1. Obviously, every control or regulation unit has a certain threshold value which must be exceeded so that the control or regulation unit becomes active. This threshold value, however, is completely independent of external values. Contrary to this, the aforementioned patent document describes, in paragraph 35, a control device which has different threshold values for the triggering of the motor as a function of the direction of movement of the movable furniture part. In this case the threshold value is a distance to be covered by the movable furniture part.
In the drive described in EP 1 374 732, shaking movements of the furniture can lead to incorrect triggering of the motor. For example, especially when the movable furniture part is in a half-open position, it can happen that the shaking movements which arise when items are being placed in the movable furniture part are so great that the movable furniture part is moved by more than 1 mm away from the furniture body. This leads to a per se unintentional triggering of the motor, as the result of which the movable furniture part is accelerated in the direction of the fully-open end position. Behaviour of this type is regarded by most users as undesirable.
The problem of the invention is therefore to refine a generic drive in such a way that the risk of unintentional triggering is reduced.
This problem is solved by a drive with the features of claim 1.
The threshold value can, for example, relate to the amount of a motion quantity of the movable furniture part, such as speed or acceleration. Alternatively, the threshold value can also relate to the amount of a force exerted by a user on the movable furniture part. In each of the cases mentioned, obviously a suitable measurement device must be provided to capture the respective values.
It would of course also be possible to make use of the measurement device which must be provided anyway to capture of the position of the movable furniture part, and to use a distance to be covered by the movable furniture part as threshold value for the control or regulation unit.
The concept according to the invention makes it possible to design the control or regulation unit in such a way that when the drive is in the installed condition on a furniture body, the threshold value for the closed end position of the movable furniture part in or on the furniture body differs from the threshold value for the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part.
For example, provision can be made that the threshold value in or on the furniture body is lower than the threshold value for the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part. This measure takes into account the fact that in its closed end position, the movable furniture part is scarcely exposed to any unintentional force effects. By selecting a lower threshold value in this end position, it is therefore possible to react earlier to the desire for actuation by a user. In the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part, however, there may arise unintentional influences of force due to the putting in or taking out of objects from the movable furniture part. A higher threshold value is therefore selected.
Provision may also be made that in the installed position of the drive on a furniture body, the threshold value for each position between the closed end position and the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part is higher than the higher of the two threshold values for the closed end position and the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part. Especially in the case of a partly-opened movable furniture part, unintentional shaking movements often occur which is why the control or regulation unit should react with the least sensitivity in this area.
Obviously it is possible, in addition to the aforementioned measures, as already described in EP 1 374 732 A1, to select the threshold value as a function of the direction of movement of the movable furniture part.
The movable furniture part can in this case for example be a drawer.
Protection is further requested for a piece of furniture with a furniture body and a movable furniture part which can be moved in or on the furniture body and wherein a drive according to one of the aforementioned embodiments is arranged.
Further advantages and details of the invention are disclosed with the aid of the figures and of the following description of the figures, which show:
a, 4b a perspective view and a top view of the embodiment shown schematically in
In
Since the movable furniture part 2, in its closed end position in the furniture body 4, is least sensitive to unintentional force effects, the lowest value S1 is selected for this area. The value S2 for the area in front of the fully-open end position of the movable furniture part 2 is already selected to be somewhat higher since the movable furniture part 2 is exposed to stronger disruptive influences in this area. The threshold value S3 is selected to be the highest since an only partly-opened movable furniture part 2 is most sensitive to an unintentional triggering.
In
In
In
For the embodiment shown in FIGS. 3 to 5, a progression of the threshold value S as a function of the position x of the movable furniture part 2 according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1221/2005 | Jul 2005 | AT | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AT06/00256 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12010054 | Jan 2008 | US |