This application is also related to application Ser. No. 08/457,688, filed May 31, 1995, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,189, and application Ser. No. 09/277,585, filed Mar. 26, 1999, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,208,323.
The present invention generally relates to a driving apparatus and a driving method for a liquid crystal display having a plurality of row electrodes and column electrodes. More particularly, the invention relates to such an apparatus and a method in which the row electrodes are divided into groups, each group being sequentially selected and the row electrodes within each group being simultaneously selected.
Matrix liquid crystal displays such as, twisted nematic (TN) and super twisted nematic (STN), are known in the art. Reference is made to
A conventional multiplex driving based on the amplitude selective addressing scheme is known to one of ordinary skill in the art as one method of driving the liquid crystal cells mentioned above. In such a method, a selected voltage or non-selected voltage is sequentially applied to each of row electrodes X1–X2 individually. That is, a selection voltage is applied to only one row electrode at a time. In the conventional driving method, the time period required to apply the successive selected or non-selected voltage to all the row electrodes X1–Xn is known as one frame period, indicated in
Simultaneously to the successive application of the selected voltage or the non-selected voltage to each of the row electrodes X1–Xn, a data signal representing an ON or OFF voltage is applied to column electrodes Y1–Ym. Accordingly, to turn a pixel 7 e.g, the area in which the row electrode intersects the column electrode, to the ON state, an ON voltage is applied to a desired column electrode when the row electrode is selected.
Referring specifically to
d) shows the waveform applied to column electrode Y1, and
One known problem with this method is that in order to select and drive the one line of the row electrodes, a relatively high voltage is required to provide good display characteristics, such as, contrast and low distortion. These conventional displays, requiring such a high voltage, also consume relatively more energy. When such displays are used in portable devices, they are supplied with electrical energy by, for example, batteries. As a result of the higher energy consumption, the portable devices have relatively shorter times of operation before the batteries require replacement and/or recharging.
Various attempts have been made to overcome this problem. For example, it has been suggested in “A Generalized Addressing Technique for RMS Responding Matrix LCDs,” 1988 International Display Research Conference, pp. 80–85. to simultaneously applying a row selection voltage to more than one row electrode.
As shown in
Referring again to
As shown in the example of
As will be explained hereinbelow, when h row electrodes are simultaneously selected, the voltage waveforms that apply the row electrodes described above use 2h row-select patterns. In the example illustrated in
Moreover, the column voltages applied to each column electrode Y1 to Ym provide the same number of pulse patterns as that of the row select pulse patterns. That is, there are 2h pulse patterns. These pulse patterns are determined by comparing the states of pixels on the simultaneously selected row electrodes i.e., whether the pixels are ON or OFF, with the polarities of the voltage pulses applied to row electrode.
In this example, as shown in the previously described
The above-mentioned column voltage waveforms Ya–Yd are determined as follows. At first, each pixel simultaneously selected is defined to have a first value of 1 when the voltage applied by the row electrode to the corresponding selected pixel is positive or a first value of −1 when the row electrode is negative. Each of the selected pixels is defined to have a second value of −1 when the display state is ON or a second value of 1 when display state is OFF. The first value is compared to the second value bit-by-bit, the difference between the number of matches, i.e., when the first value equals the second value, and the number of mismatches, i.e., when the first value does not equal the second value, is calculated. When the difference between the number of matches and mismatches for the simultaneously selected rows is two, V2 is applied; when 0, V0 is applied; and when −2, −V2 is applied.
For example, when the pulse waveforms shown in
As should now be apparent, the first values in time interval tc in
In time interval td, the applied voltage of row electrodes X1 and X2 are both positive. Thus, the first values are 1 and 1. When compared to the pixel states of −1 and 1, the number of matches is 1 and the number of mismatches is 1, thus the difference between the number of matches and the number of mismatches is zero. Accordingly, zero volts will be applied to Ya for the time interval td.
A summary of this analysis for time periods ta, tb, tc and td, is shown in Table A below:
As is readily apparent, the column voltage Ya corresponds to the column voltage pattern and is applied to the column to place the first pixel in its ON state and the second pixel in its OFF state.
As for the other column voltage waveforms, Yb to Yd, the voltages are selected under the same criteria as described above and are summarized in Tables B, C and D hereinbelow:
In the examples above, the first value is 1 when the row-select voltage has a positive polarity or the first value when the row-select voltage has a negative polarity. Additionally, the second value is −1 when the display state of the pixel is ON, or 1 when the display state is OFF. The column voltage waveforms were selected by means of the difference between the number of matches and the number of mismatches. As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the sign conventions may be inverted. Moreover, it also is possible to set the column voltage waveforms with only the number of matches or the number of mismatches, without having to calculate the difference between the number of matches and the number of mismatches as explained below.
a)–(d) illustrate another example of the prior art in which a plurality of row electrodes are divided into groups of row electrodes. The groups of row electrodes are selected in sequence and the row electrodes within each group are simultaneously selected. In this example, each group comprises three row electrodes that are simultaneously selected in order to generate a display pattern, as shown in
In other words, initially three row electrodes, X1, X2 and X3, are selected and row selection voltages such as those shown in
When each row voltage waveform described above has h as the number of row electrodes that are simultaneously selected, as in previous example, the number of 2h row-select pattern are used. In this example, the number of 23 or 8 patterns are used.
Moreover, as in the previous example, the column voltages applied to each column electrode, Y1 to Ym, are the same as the number of row-select patterns. Also, the voltage level of each pulse is such that the voltage that corresponds to the numbers of the ON state and the OFF state of the selected row electrodes is applied. In other words, the column voltage level is determined by comparing the row-select pattern and display pattern. Thus, for example, when the row voltage waveforms applied to row electrodes X1, X2 and X3, which are selected simultaneously in this example, have a positive pulse, they are ON, and when they have a negative pulse, they are OFF. The ON and the OFF of the display data are compared at each pulse and the column voltage waveforms are set according to the number of mismatches.
In other words, in the example of
In specific terms, in the case of the voltage waveforms applied to row electrodes X1, X2 and X3 in
In the next time period, the next three row electrodes X4 to X6, are selected by applying selection voltages thereto, as shown in
As indicated above, the method that simultaneously selects a plurality of row electrodes in a group and the selection of each group in sequence, has the advantage of the reducing the drive voltage level.
Referring now to
The following is a general discussion regarding the conventional method for simultaneously selecting multiple row electrodes.
A. Requirements
(a) The N number of row electrodes to be displayed are divided up into N/h non-intersecting subgroups.
(b) Each subgroup has h number of address lines.
(c) At a particular time, the display data on each column electrode is composed of an h-bit words, e.g.:
dk*h+1, dk*h+2 . . . dk*h+h; dk*h+j=0 or 1
Where 0≦k≦(N/h)−1 (k: subgroup)
In other words, one column of display data is:
B. Guidelines
(1) One subgroup is selected simultaneously for addressing.
(2) One h-bit word is selected as the row-select pattern.
(3) The row-select voltages are:
(4) The row-select patterns and the display data patterns in the selected subgroup are compared bit by bit such as with digital comparators, viz. exclusive OR logic gates.
(5) The number of mismatches i between these two patterns is determined by counting the number of exclusive-OR logic gates having a logical 1 output.
Steps 1–4 are summarized by the following equation:
(6) The column voltage is chosen to be V(i) when the number of mismatches is i.
(7) The column voltages for each column in the matrix is determined independently by repeating the steps (4)–(6).
(8) Both the row voltage and column voltage are applied simultaneously to the matrix display for a time duration Δt, where Δt is minimum pulse width.
(9) A new row-select pattern is chosen and the column voltages are determined using steps (4)–(6). The new row and column voltages are applied to the display for an equal duration of time at the end of Δt.
(10) A frame or cycle is completed when all of the subgroups (=N/h) are selected with all the 2h row-select patterns once.
1 cycle=Δt·2h·N/h
C. Analysis
The row select patterns in a case in which there are i number of mismatches will now be considered. The number of h-bit row-select patterns which differ from and h-bit display data pattern by i bits is given by
hCi=h!/{i! (h−i)!}=Ci
For example, when the case for h=3 and row electrode selection pattern=(0,0,0) is considered, the results would be as shown in the table below:
These are determined by the number of bits of a word, not the row electrode selection patterns.
If the amplitude Vpixel of the instantaneous voltage that is applied to the pixel had a row voltage of Vrow and column voltage of Vcolumn, the synthesized voltage would be as follows:
Vpixel=(Vcolumn−Vrow) or (Vrow−Vcolumn)
Where, if Vrow=±Vr and Vcolumn=V(i), then Vpixel=+Vr−V(i) or −Vr−V(i).
If Vrow=±Vr and Vcolumn=±V(i), then Vpixel=Vr−V(i), Vr+V(i), −Vr−V(i) or −Vr+V(i).
That is:
Vpixel=|Vr−V(i)| or |Vr+V(i)|
As a consequence, the specific amplitude to be applied to the pixel is either −(Vr+V(i)) or (Vr−V(i)) in the selection row and is V(i) in the non-selection row.
In general, in order to achieve a high selection ratio, it is desirable that the voltage across a pixel should be as high as possible for an ON pixel and as low as possible for an OFF pixel.
As a result, when a pixel is in the ON state, the voltage |Vr+V(i)| is favorable for the ON pixel, and the voltage |Vr−V(i)| is unfavorable for the ON pixel. On the other hand, when a pixel is in the OFF state, the voltage |Vr−V(i)| is favorable for the OFF pixel, and the voltage |Vr+V(i)| is unfavorable for the OFF pixel.
Here, it is favorable for the ON pixel to increase the effective voltage and unfavorable for the ON pixel to decrease the effective voltage. The number of combinations that selects i units from among the h bits is:
Ci=hCi={h!}/{i!(h−i)!}
The total number of mismatches provides the number of unfavorable voltages in the selected rows in a column. The total number of mismatches is i·Ci in Ci row select patterns considered are equally distributed over the h pixels in the selected rows. Hence the number of unfavorable voltages per pixel (Bi) when number of mismatches is i can be obtained as given following;
Bi=i·Ci/h(units/pixel)
The number of times a pixel gets a favorable voltage during the Ci time intervals considered is:
Ai={(h−i)/h}·Ci
In addition:
{(h−i)/h}·Ci+(i/h)·Ci=(h/h)Ci=Ci
Accordingly, the following is obtained:
Ai=Ci−Bi={(h−1)!}/{i!·(h−i−1)!}
Where: h≦i+1
To summarize the above:
In addition:
Vr/Vo=N1/2/h . . . row selection voltage
V(i)/V0=(h−2i)/h={1−(2i/h)} . . . column voltage, and
R=(Von/Voff)max={(N1/2+1)/(N1/2−1)}1/2
As noted above and as shown in
Moreover, as shown in
It is an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus that obviates the aforementioned problems of the conventional liquid crystal devices.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a liquid crystal display for displaying an image having high image quality.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a liquid crystal display with good contrast characteristics.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a display with a reduced number of column voltage levels.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent upon a consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Although the detailed description and annexed drawings describe a number of preferred embodiments of the present invention, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many variations and modifications of the present invention fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a multiplex driving method is provided for a liquid crystal display device having a liquid crystal layer disposed between a pair of substrates, a plurality of row electrodes arranged on one of the substrates and a plurality of column electrodes arranged on the other substrate. The method comprises the steps of sequentially selecting a group of the plurality of row electrodes in a selection period, simultaneously selecting the row electrodes comprising each group, and dividing and separating the selection period into a plurality of intervals within one frame period.
By adopting such a driving method, for example, after a selection voltage has been applied to a particular pixel in the initial frame, the voltage will be applied to that pixel several times during the period until the selection voltage is applied to that pixel in the next frame. This makes it possible to maintain brightness and prevent a reduction in contrast.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a first portion of a selection signal is sequentially applied to each of j groups of row electrodes in a first selection period of a frame, such that the first portion of the selection signal is simultaneously applied to i row electrodes in each of the j groups. A second portion of the selection signal is sequentially applied to the j groups of row electrodes in a second selection period of the frame, such that the second portion of the selection signal is simultaneously applied to the i row electrodes in each of the j groups.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, a display apparatus is provided comprising a display having a plurality of row electrodes and column electrodes, the row electrodes being arranged in groups. A drive circuit comprises a row electrode data generating circuit for generating row selection pulse data and a frame memory for providing display data. An arithmetic operation circuit calculates converted data in accordance with the row selection pulse data generated by the drive circuit and the display data provided by the frame memory. A column electrode driver is responsive to the converted data calculated by the arithmetic operation circuit for generating column data for the plurality of column electrodes. A row electrode driver is responsive to the row selection pulse data generated by said drive circuit for selecting in sequence each of the groups of row electrodes. The row electrodes comprising each of the groups are selected simultaneously, and scanning of one screen is performed a plurality of times in accordance with the row selection pulse data and the display data during one frame period. By having a drive circuit such as that described above, it is possible to execute the drive method described above easily and reliably.
In accordance with such a display device, the display device has a driving circuit which performs the steps of calculating the row-select pattern generated by the row electrode data generation circuit and the display data pattern on the plurality of row electrodes which are read in sequence from the frame memory. The row electrodes are then selected simultaneously with the row-select pattern. The driving circuit transfers the converted data, which is the result of the calculation, to the column electrode driver, and transfers the row data, which is generated by the row electrode data generation circuit, to the row electrode driver. Further, the driving circuit repeats the above-mentioned operation by the next row-select pattern data and display data pattern when scanning of one image is finished. The screen operation is repeated several times in one frame period. Thus, the display device according to the present invention has excellent contrast characteristics.
According to still yet a further aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for determining a number of voltage levels applied to each of m column electrodes in a liquid crystal display having a pair of opposing substrates, n row electrodes disposed on one of the substrates and the m column electrodes disposed on the other of the substrates, and a liquid crystal material disposed between the pair of substrates, n×m pixels being formed at the intersection of the n row electrodes and the m column electrodes. The n row electrodes are divided into j groups, each group having at least i row electrodes, i, j, n and m being positive integers greater than 1, i being less than n and j being less than n. A selection signal is applied sequentially to each of the j groups of row electrodes and simultaneously applied to each of the i row electrodes in a plurality of time periods for displaying an image in a frame period. The method comprising the step of, for each of the time periods, determining a first number of mismatches between the selection signal applied to the i row electrodes and display states of the pixels formed at the intersections of the i row electrodes and one of the m columns electrodes. A virtual selection signal is applied to a virtual row electrode and a second number of mismatches between the virtual selection signal applied to the virtual electrode and a display state of a virtual pixel formed at the intersection of the one column electrode and the virtual row electrode is determined. A third number of mismatches is defined by the sum of the first and second number of mismatches, and the virtual selection signal has a waveform and the virtual pixel has a display state such that the third number of mismatches is either an odd number or an even number. A number of matches between the selection signal applied to the i row electrodes and the display states of the pixels at the intersections of the i row electrodes and the one column electrode and between the virtual selection signal applied to the virtual row electrode and the display state of the virtual pixel formed at the intersection of the virtual electrode and the one column electrode is determined. The voltage level for each time period is a level corresponding to the difference between the third number of mismatches and the number of matches. The above-discussed process is repeated for each of the time periods.
In the drawings, wherein like reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views.
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms in accordance with the first embodiment of a driving method of the liquid crystal display according to the present invention.
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms of a second embodiment of a driving method of the liquid crystal display according to the present invention.
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms of a third embodiment of a driving method of the liquid crystal display according to the present invention.
a)–(b) show the applied row selection and column electrode voltage waveforms which correspond to the display patterns of
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms of a fourth embodiment of a driving method of the liquid crystal display according to the present invention.
a) illustrates the applied row selection voltage waveforms that are applied to the row electrodes according to the embodiment of
b) shows the applied column voltage waveforms that are applied to the column electrodes that correspond to the display patterns of
a)–(d) shows the applied voltage waveforms of a fifth embodiment of a driving method of the liquid crystal display of the present invention.
a)–(c) are other examples of the applied electrodes voltage waveforms in accordance with the present invention.
a)–(d) shows another example of the applied voltage waveforms in accordance with the present invention.
a)–(d) shows the applied voltage waveforms of another embodiment of the
a)–(d) shows the applied voltage waveforms of a seventh embodiment of the driving method of the liquid crystal display of the present invention.
a)–(e) show the applied voltage waveforms of a conventional driving method of a liquid crystal display.
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms of a conventional driving method of a liquid crystal display.
a)–(b) illustrates the row selection and column voltage waveforms that are applied to the row and column electrodes in accordance with the conventional driving method of
a)–(d) show the applied voltage waveforms another conventional driving method of a liquid crystal display.
a)–(c) are graphs that show the relationship between the applied voltage to a liquid crystal display and the transmissitivity thereof driven in accordance with a conventional driving method.
a)–(d) are graphs comparing the transmissitivity of a liquid crystal panel driven in accordance with the present invention and driven in accordance with a conventional method.
Referring to
Turning to
The operation of the liquid crystal display panel will now be described with respect to
Row electrode generator 5 generates a row-select pattern S3 for sequentially selecting a group of row electrodes and for simultaneously selecting the row electrodes within each group to row driver 1. As shown in
Image data generated by, for example, a CPU (not shown) is stored in frame memory 3. A display data signal S1, which corresponds to each of the row electrodes selected simultaneously, is read from memory 3 for providing each column voltage waveform. As shown in
As shown in
First Embodiment
A driving method for a liquid crystal display in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention will now be described. As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the driving method may be implemented in a driving circuit as discussed above.
Referring to
In accordance with the first embodiment, the row selection period comprises two intervals or portions. That is, the row electrodes are selected twice within one selection period or one frame period F. It is during the one frame period F that a complete image is displayed.
Referring to
More specifically, the first group of row electrode comprising row electrodes X1 and X2 are simultaneously selected in period ti. Row selection voltage waveforms in that time interval similar to those in the conventional method illustrated in
As shown in
By driving the liquid crystal display panel in this manner, the optical response shown in
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the row selection period may divided into more than two intervals in one frame period F. In addition, while in the embodiment described above, each group of row electrodes contained two row electrodes, it is contemplated that each group may contain more than two row electrodes. Moreover it is also contemplated that each of the groups of row electrodes may be selected in any arbitrary order.
Second Embodiment
a)–(d) show a second embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the row selection voltage waveforms applied in the first frame are substantially similar to those of the first embodiment. However, in the second frame, the row selection voltage waveforms applied to the first row electrode in each group in the first frame period is now applied to the second row electrode in each group in the second frame period. Similarly, the row selection voltage waveforms applied to the second row electrode in each group in the first frame is now applied to the first row electrode in each group. In other words, the row selection waveform is alternately applied to each row electrode of each group in alternate frame periods. As noted above, it is contemplated that each group of row electrodes may contain more than two electrodes.
As described above, if for each frame F, if such waveforms are applied, it is possible to prevent pictures on the display from generating non-uniformity caused by differences in the applied voltage waveforms as in conventional methods.
In addition, because in this embodiment the selection period is divided in two intervals within one frame F, just as with the aforesaid first embodiment, the contrast is improved and flickering is also reduced.
Further, in this embodiment, it is also possible to use a drive circuit that is the same as the drive circuit that is explained in the aforesaid embodiment, and to provide with display device having a high display quality as well. In the aforesaid embodiment, the row selection voltage waveforms were replaced after each frame. However, they also can be replaced after a plurality of frames.
The description of the aforesaid first embodiment and second embodiment provided an example in which two row electrodes were selected simultaneously. However, as in the embodiments to be described below, it also is possible to drive by selecting three or more row electrodes simultaneously. In such a case, as in the second embodiment, it is possible to replace in sequence at each one frame or at a plurality of frames the row selection voltage waveforms that are applied to the row electrodes that are selected simultaneously. For example, if each group contained three row electrodes, the row selection waveforms would be selectively applied to the three row electrodes in three frame periods.
Third Embodiment
a)–(d) illustrate a third embodiment of the present invention. As shown therein, the row selection voltage waveforms applied in the first frame are substantially similar to those of the first embodiment. However, in the second frame, the row selection voltage waveforms are inversions of the row selection voltage waveforms applied in the first frame. That is, the row selection voltage waveforms in the second frame period have the opposite polarities to those of the first frame period. In the preferred embodiment, the polarity of the waveforms are inverted for each frame period.
More specifically
Similar to the aforesaid first embodiment, two row electrodes are selected simultaneously. The row voltage with the voltage waveforms shown in
The sequence of the row electrode selection is the same as that in the aforesaid first embodiment. First, row electrodes X1 and X2 are selected and the row selection voltage waveform is applied to these electrodes for a time duration t1. At the same time, the designated column voltage, which corresponds to the display data, is applied to all of the column electrodes Y1 to Ym. Next, row electrodes X3 and X4 are selected and the same row voltage waveforms as the aforesaid row electrodes X1 and X2 are applied there for the time duration t11. At the same time, the designated column voltage, which corresponds to the display data pattern, is applied to all of the column electrodes Y1 to Ym. This is repeated until all of the row electrodes X1 to Xn have been selected.
Next, row electrodes X1 and X2 are selected once again and row selection voltage is applied to them for the time duration t2. At the same time, the designated column voltage, which corresponds to the display data, is applied to all of the column electrodes Y1 to Ym. Next, row electrodes X3 and X4 are selected and the same row voltage waveforms as the aforesaid row electrodes, X1 and X2, are applied thereto for the time duration t12. At the same time, the designated column voltage, which corresponds to the display data, is applied to all of the column electrodes Y1 to Ym. This sequence is repeated until all of the row electrodes X1 to Xn have been selected.
In this embodiment, the polarity of the row selection voltage waveforms applied to each row electrode is inverted or reversed at each frame. This is referred to as an alternating current drive scheme. In such a case, it is possible to reverse the positive and negative polarities at alternate frames. In addition, it also is possible to apply the alternating current drive method mentioned above to the previously described embodiments and to the embodiments to be described below.
As should now be apparent, the column voltages are selected in accordance with the method as described above.
a)–(b) show the relationship between the row selection voltage waveforms applied to the row electrodes that are selected simultaneously and the signal waveforms applied to each column electrode. In
In other words, when the pixels on both row electrodes X1 and X2 are both in the OFF state, as in display pattern a in
As in previously described in the second example of the conventional method, the column voltage waveform is similarly determined. In the case of the column voltage waveforms described above, if assuming that when the row selection voltage pulse applied to row electrodes X1 and X2 is positive, the pixel is assigned a first value of 1. Alternatively, if the voltage pulse is negative, the pixel is assigned a first value of −1. The pixel is assigned a second value of −1 if it is in the ON state and a second value of 1 if it is in the OFF state. As in the example of the conventional method, the number of mismatches and matches are determined. When the difference between the number of matches and the number of mismatches is 2, V2 volts is applied, when the difference is zero, zero volts is applied, and when the difference is −2, −V2 volts is be applied.
For example, as in display pattern a in
As for the other column voltage waveforms, Yb to Yd are applied to obtain the display patterns as shown in lines b, c, and d, respectively, of
Indeed, when 240 row electrodes were fabricated and the driving took place at drive voltages set to V1=16.8 volts and V2=2.1 volts, the same optical response as in the previously described
Moreover, in the drive method of this embodiment, it also was possible to use a drive circuit that is similar as that of the first embodiment, which is shown in the previously described
A converted data signal is transferred to the column electrode driver by arithmetic operation circuit 4, to generate the column voltage waveforms applied to each column electrode.
By using a drive circuit such as that described above, it is possible to execute the previously described drive method simply and reliably. In addition, it also is possible to provide a display device that has excellent display performance.
Fourth Embodiment
a)–(d) show voltage waveforms applied to the row and column electrodes of a liquid crystal display panel that represent a fourth embodiment of the drive method of the liquid crystal display panel of the present invention. In
In the fourth embodiment, row electrodes X1 to X4 are simultaneously selected for the time duration t1. At the same time, a designated column voltage that corresponds to the display data is applied to column electrodes Y1 to Ym. Next, row electrodes X5 to X6 are selected by the application of the same row voltage as that for the previously described row electrodes X1 to X4 in the time duration t11. At the same time, the designated column voltage that corresponds to the display data is applied to each column electrode, Y1 to Ym. This is repeated until all of the row electrodes, X1 to Xn, have been selected.
Next, row electrodes X1 to X4 are selected once again and row selection voltages are applied to them during the time duration t2. At the same time, the designated column voltage that corresponds to the display data will be applied to each column electrode, Y1 to Ym. After this, row electrodes X5 to X6 are selected and the same row voltage as the previously described row electrodes X1 and X2 is applied to them during the time duration t12. At the same time, the designated column voltage that corresponds to the display data is applied to each column electrode, Y1 to Ym. This is repeated until all of the row electrodes, X1 to Xn, have been selected. By repeating the same operation as the above operation four times in one frame F, one image or one screen will be displayed.
In this embodiment, the polarity of the row selection waveforms are reversed in the second frame period. Moreover, in this embodiment, the column voltage is determined as discussed above.
a) illustrates the row selection voltage waveforms applied to each of the row electrodes, X1 to X4,
That is to say, when the pixels on simultaneously selected row electrodes X1 to X4 are all OFF, such as, for example, display pattern on line a of
As is apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the column voltage waveforms are determined in accordance with the previously described method. Accordingly, the detail of which will be omitted.
As described above, in this embodiment as well, four row electrodes are selected in sequence and driving is carried out by dividing the selection period into four separated intervals within the one frame F.
When fabricating 240 row electrodes and by driving with the drive voltage as V1=12 volts, V2=1.5 volts, and V3=3 volts, the optical response is the same as that shown in previously described
In the third embodiment and the fourth embodiment, driving was accomplished by dividing the selection period either in two or four intervals and separating them two times or four times within one frame F. However, the number of times the selection period is divided may be changed to improve the displayed image. In addition, the number of row electrodes comprising each group may be varied to improve the displayed image.
Fifth Embodiment
a)–(d) depict a fifth embodiment of the present invention. In the fifth embodiment, the row selection voltage waveforms are based on the row selection voltage waveforms depicted in
At the same time, the column voltage waveforms of the designated voltage level, correspond to the difference between the number of mismatches and matches, as discussed above.
A liquid crystal display panel driven according to this method, has pixels which are brighter in the ON state and darker in the OFF state. As a result there is an improvement in contrast and reduction in flicker as compared to conventional arrangements.
It is also contemplated, that the driving method may be implemented by the circuits of
Sixth Embodiment
As stated above, the number of bit-word patterns when selecting and driving a plurality (h number) of row electrodes in sequence is 2h. For example, as in the aforesaid example, when h=3, 23=8 patterns. With ON is assigned the value 1 and OFF is assigned the value 0, the voltage ON and OFF pattern shown in
It is noted that waveforms applied in accordance with
For this reason, the voltage waveforms are changed to eliminate the deviation of the frequency components. However, using the type of waveform in
For this reason, in this embodiment, the voltage waveforms applied to the row electrodes are set under the following guidelines so that the pulse widths become wider.
For applied voltage waveforms to the row electrodes, these are determined taking the following into consideration:
(1) Each row electrode must be distinguishable.
(2) The frequency component added to each row electrode must not differ significantly.
(3) There must be alternating current characteristics within one frame or within a plurality of frames.
In other words, the applied voltage patterns are to be appropriately selected, taking the conditions mentioned above into consideration, from among the systems of orthogonal functions, such as natural binary, Walsh and Hadamard.
Among these, item number (1) is an necessary-sufficient condition. In particular, in order to satisfy item number (1), it is preferred that the applied voltage waveforms of each row electrode will each have different frequency components. The applied voltage waveforms, which include different frequency components, are:
The voltage waveforms of
In the case of n=2, the formula (1) is included in formula (2), thus H4 or H2 can be obtained as follows:
Further, in the case of n=4, the formula (2) is included in formula (3), thus H2n or H8 can be obtained as follows:
It is noted that in the natural type Hadamard matrix the orthogonal feature is maintained even under the following transformations:
Additionally, the natural type Hadamard matrix is a square matrix, e.g. the number of row is equal to the number of columns. However if only a few rows are selected, the orthogonal feature is not lost. For example if 3 rows are selected from H8, the matrix remains orthogonal.
In this example, + corresponds to 1 and − corresponds to 0. Either expression is permissible since the Hadamard matrix is binary.
In accordance with the above guidelines, the voltage waveforms depicted in
It is noted that row 1 of the H8 matrix was preferably omitted because it is essentially a DC signal, rows 4, 6, 7 and 8 were preferably omitted because each of those waveforms contained a larger number of different frequency component.
The first row of matrix A is replaced with the third row to form matrix A′ as follows:
Finally matrix A′ is inverted to obtained the row selection waveforms of
The waveforms depicted in
The voltage waveforms shown in
Next, the first row is replaced with the third row, the second row is replaced with the first row and the third row is replaced with the second row forming matrix C′
Finally, the first and the second rows are inverted forming matrix C″ or the row selection waveform shown in
In these waveforms the polarity of adjacent columns is the same, so if such adjacent columns belong to one group, the matrix is the same as obtained by selecting the third, the fourth and the second columns of matrix H4. In other words, the matrix is obtained without row and column transformation. Moreover, the row select waveforms may be obtained by other binary, Hadamard, Walsh, Rademacher and other orthogonal functions.
In contrast to the shortest pulse width in
The waveforms of the embodiment described above are only one example. They can be changed as appropriate to further improve the displayed image. In addition, factors such as the row electrode selection sequence and the arrangement sequence of the pulse patterns that are applied to each row electrode can be changed as desired.
a)–(d) show an example in which the row selection waveforms in
A liquid crystal display panel driven according to this method, has pixels which are brighter in the ON state and darker in the OFF state. As a result there is an improvement in contrast and reduction in flicker as compared to conventional arrangements. Additionally, crosstalk is reduced.
Seventh Embodiment
In the embodiment described above, four levels, V3, V2, −V2 and −V3, were used as the column electrode voltage levels. However, the number of levels can be reduced under the following method. By reducing the voltage levels, a driving circuit can be fabricated which is simpler and more reliable.
Initially, a description will be given based on the general methods of reducing the number of previously mentioned voltage levels.
In this embodiment, subgroup h comprises a virtual line e. Line e is a virtual electrode and its sole purpose is for determining the voltage levels applied to the column electrodes. There is no requirement that the virtual electrode is to be fabricated on the liquid crystal display panel. However the virtual electrode may be fabricated in a non-display area of the display panel.
The number of voltage levels may be reduced by controlling the number of matches and mismatches of the virtual row electrode data. As a result, the total number of matches and number of mismatches will be limited, and the number of drive voltage levels for column electrodes will be reduced.
With Mi representing the number of mismatches and Vc representing the appropriate constant, Vcolumn, the applied voltage to the column electrode, is to be as follows:
or, more simply:
Vcolumn=V(i)(0≦i≦h)
In either case, Vcolumn is the h+1 level.
For example, the case in which subgroup h=4 and virtual row electrode e=1 will be considered. As in the previous embodiment, the number of levels when h=3 will be four levels, −V3, −V2, V2 and V3. If control takes place through the virtual row electrodes so that there are an even number of mismatches, the results are as shown in the table below. In other words, a virtual pixel formed by the intersection of the virtual row electrode and column electrode has a display state and row selection voltage waveform such that it is either a match or a mismatch.
As shown in this example, the virtual pixel is provided with a match when the original number of mismatches is even or zero and the virtual pixel is provided with a mismatch when the original number of mismatches is odd.
As shown above, it is possible to take an original four levels and reduce them to three levels. Of course the mismatches on the virtual electrode may be any combination of matches or mismatches. For example if the virtual pixel were an odd number, the number of mismatches on revision in the above table would change in sequence from the top to 1, 1, 3 and 3. Thus it is possible to reduce the number of voltage levels to two levels.
In another example, a subgroup has h=4 and the number of voltage levels is five, i.e., −V3, −V2, 0, V2 and V3. However, if control takes place through the virtual row electrodes so that there are an even number of mismatches, the results are shown in the table below.
As shown above, it is possible to take an original five levels and reduce them to three levels. In the above case, it is possible to set the voltage levels so that the number of mismatches is an odd number. As for the virtual row electrodes above, since normally they need not display, they do not necessarily have to be fabricated. However, if they are fabricated, they can be fabricated in an area where they will not effect the display.
For example, as shown in
In addition, if e number of virtual row electrodes is increased, the number of voltage levels can be reduced even further. In such a case, if as above, e=1, all of the number of mismatches can be controlled so that they can be divided by 2. For example, in the case of e=2, the number of mismatches all can be controlled so that they can be divided by 3. However, they can all be divided by 3 and have 1 or 2 remaining.
Finally, the maximum number of reductions possible under the above method is 1/(e+1). When e=1, it is ½, except for zero volts.
a)–(d) illustrate an example in which three row electrodes and one virtual row electrode are used in sequence to reduce the applied voltage level to the column electrodes. In this example there are four intervals in the frame period. The number of mismatches is determined with the virtual electrode. In this example, the virtual electrode is set to an odd number of mismatches, thus making the number of mismatches a one or a three. In response to this, the voltage level of the column voltage waveform is one of two levels, V2 or −V2.
More specifically, for example in
Next, looking at the t2 period, assuming that V1 is applied to virtual row electrode Xn+1, the number of mismatches is three, and voltage pulse V2 is to be applied to the column electrode. In addition, assuming that V1 is applied to virtual row electrode Xn+1 in the t3 period, the number of mismatches is three, and a voltage pulse V2 is applied to the column electrode. Finally, assuming voltage pulse −V1 is applied to virtual row electrode Xn+1 in the t4 period, there is one mismatch, and a voltage pulse −V2 is applied to the column electrode.
The voltage levels that are applied to the column electrodes can be reduced by assuming the polarity and the display data of the selection pulse to be applied to the virtual row electrodes in this manner, and by making the number of mismatches always odd numbers such as one and three. In the embodiment described above, the voltage levels can be reduced to two levels. However, as stated above, they also may be made into even numbers. By reversing each polarity of the applied voltage in the first frame period F1 and the applied voltage in frame period F2, alternating current drive scheme is realized.
By reducing the number of voltage levels that are applied to the column electrodes as described above, the circuit configuration of the liquid crystal drive can be simplified, allowing a drive circuit that is almost identical to that described in the previous embodiments to be used. In addition, as in the previously described embodiments, this allows a display device with excellent display performance to be obtained.
It should accordingly be understood that the preferred embodiments and specific examples of modifications thereto which have been described are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be construed as limitations on the scope of the present invention. Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be further understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated and described, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4-48743 | Mar 1992 | JP | national |
4-84007 | Apr 1992 | JP | national |
4-14382 | May 1992 | JP | national |
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/821,063, filed Mar. 28, 2001 which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/281,997, filed Mar. 29, 1999, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,573, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/148,083, filed Nov. 4, 1993, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,563, which is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/JP93/00279, filed on Mar. 4, 1993 designating the United States, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3973252 | Mitomo et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4100579 | Ernstoff | Jul 1978 | A |
4683497 | Mehrgardt | Jul 1987 | A |
4873516 | Castleberry | Oct 1989 | A |
5041821 | Onitsuka et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5262881 | Kuwata et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280280 | Hotto | Jan 1994 | A |
5365284 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5420604 | Scheffer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5489919 | Kuwata et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5596344 | Kuwata et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626881 | Lown | May 1997 | A |
5682177 | Kuwata et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6084563 | Ito et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
645473 | Sep 1984 | CH |
4031905 | Apr 1991 | DE |
0349415 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0388976 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0479450 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 507 061 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0507061 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0569974 | Nov 1993 | EP |
5156118 | May 1976 | JP |
54 22856 | Aug 1979 | JP |
57 15393 | Mar 1982 | JP |
61-262724 | Nov 1986 | JP |
62-102230 | May 1987 | JP |
1-267694 | Oct 1989 | JP |
3-185490 | Aug 1991 | JP |
05-100642 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5303079 | Nov 1993 | JP |
627904 | Feb 1994 | JP |
627908 | Feb 1994 | JP |
95 01628 | Jan 1995 | WO |
98 20550 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030043099 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09821063 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10164984 | US | |
Parent | 09281997 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09821063 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08148083 | Nov 1993 | US |
Child | 09281997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP93/00279 | Mar 1993 | US |
Child | 08148083 | US |