This is a U.S. national phase application, which is based on, and claims priority from, PCT application Serial No. PCT/EP2011/000937, filed Feb. 25, 2011, which claims priority from foreign application Serial No. 10 2010 019 392.5, filed May 4, 2010, in Germany.
The invention concerns a drive unit for electrical rail vehicles. See for instance DE 195 30 155 AI, WO 96/25314 AI. Document DE 102 25 708 B4 describes a transmission housing for receiving a transmission main wheel, with a bonnet, which is fitted with a flange. The transmission housing is arranged as a single-part in the region of a bearing. The bonnet is arranged as a partial hood.
Document DE 10 2008 008 027 describes a drive unit having a transmission which is supported on the travelling motor.
A suitable vibration behaviour of the drive unit can be observed in particular with fast moving vehicles. The masses of unsprung components should be kept as low as possible and more precisely for preserving the drive unit, as well as the roadway. Such is not always the case with the drive units known so far.
The object of the invention is then to design a drive unit of the kind mentioned above in such a way that the mass of the involved components can be kept as minimal as possible and that the driving dynamics are improved with respect to known drive units.
The important characteristics of the invention are as follows:
The housing consists of a single main part and of a lid.
The engine rests on a single console, which is fastened to the supporting tube. The supporting tube is moulded to the main part of the housing, so that both of them form a rigid unit together.
The inventor has recognised a significant shortcoming of conventional drive units: If the housing consists of two components, these must always be set up separately on machine tools for machining purposes, for instance for drilling or milling. The consequence is that manufacturing tolerances add up when paired. Instead of that, the one-piece design of the housing enables its production in a single setup on the machine tool. The manufacturing tolerances, which otherwise add up, are hence reduced significantly.
With drive units known so far the engine attachment is hyperstatic as a result of its design. This causes deviations of the reference position and hence the risk of undesirable stresses and vibrations.
With the two-part construction type of the housing, it admittedly can be contemplated to screw both housing portions together before final machining. This however has the shortcoming that the housing portions are then not freely interchangeable any longer. They should far more be characterised as belonging together.
The state of the art as well as the invention will be better understood with reference to the drawing. The following details are shown:
Supporting tube 2 and housing 3 are fixedly connected to one another via a flange 2.1 as well as by means of screws.
The housing encloses a spur gear (not shown) as well as a drive pinion 4.
Two brackets 5, 6 are provided on the supporting tube 2. These carry an engine non-illustrated here. The output shaft of the engine works on the drive pinion 4. This two-part embodiment of housing and supporting tube produces an interface * having the usual manufacturing deficiencies at the connection point of both housing portions 2 and 3. If the latter are added to each not properly this will operation has a negative influence on the exact fit of the connection parts with the engine. It should be noted that the latter is fixedly connected to the supporting tube 2 as well as to the housing 3.
The embodiment according to the invention differentiates from the form of embodiment according to
First of all, housing 3 is a single-part. It comprises a main part 3.1, which completely encloses spur gear (not shown) and drive pinion 4, otherwise than with the embodiment according to
The shaft 1 as well as the supporting tube 2 are clearly visible. The supporting tube 2 includes a single bracket 5. The bracket 5 is mounted on the supporting tube 2. The supporting tube 2 can for instance be produced as a cast part in a single process together with the housing parts 3.1 and 3.2.
The engine is not shown. An engine bell 7 is however recognisable. Said bell is in the shape of a truncated cone in the present case. It comprises a ring 7.1 as well as spokes 7.2. The spokes 7.2 are—seen in direction of the rotational axis of the drive pinion 4—arranged radially. They radially external ends mesh into the ring 7, and their radially internal ends the main part 3.1 of the housing.
The engine is mounted on the console 5 as well as on the ring 7.1 of the engine bell. The blower air of the engine flows through the interspaces between the spokes 7.2 outwardly.
A substantial advantage of the form of embodiment according to the invention shown in
Moreover, the main part 3.1 of the housing 3 and the supporting tube are as a single-part since the supporting tube 2 is moulded to the main part of the housing 3.1. The single console 5 as well as the exact positioning of the engine bell 7 ensure exact positioning of the engine as well as fastening thereof with distinct reduction of the negative effects of the static overdetermination.
The one-piece design of the main part 3.1 of the housing 3 enables to dispense with any connection interface and hence improves the operating precision.
The drive pinion 4 is connected to and actuated by the engine via a membrane coupling 8. See
For easier assembly and disassembly of the engine, the membrane coupling 8 can be split and the parts connected to one another with a screw connection
The additional advantages are as follows:
Reduction of the machining costs of the housing.
Reduction in the quantity of the various components, which implies smaller costs of warehousing, procurement and so forth.
The technical risk is reduced, since defects which may crop up during sealing and connecting two housing parts have been eliminated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 019 392 | May 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/000937 | 2/25/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/27/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/137943 | 11/10/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2023856 | Sanders | Dec 1935 | A |
3244116 | McGlade | Apr 1966 | A |
5791256 | Johnson | Aug 1998 | A |
6431929 | Schafer et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 30 155 | Feb 1997 | DE |
102 25 708 | Sep 2007 | DE |
10 2008 008 027 | Aug 2009 | DE |
0 792 784 | Sep 1997 | EP |
628681 | Sep 1949 | GB |
WO 9625314 | Aug 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120125224 A1 | May 2012 | US |