This innovation relates to drivers for optic signal generators and in particular to an apparatus and method for implementing a distributed amplifier with optional distributed biasing cells.
Numerous devices utilize optic signal generators to create an optic signal. Optic based communication systems are one exemplary environment of use that utilize optic signal generators, such as lasers, light emitting diodes or silicon photonics systems. Optic based communication systems transmit and receive optic signals, which represent data, over a fiber optic cable. The data is processed by a transmitter to a format suitable for transmission as an optic signal and thereafter a driver amplifies the data signal to a level suitable to driver the optic signal generator.
Output return loss (ORL) of the associated driver is a critical requirement for high frequency operation as the input return loss (IRL) of these optical signal generators is not well controlled in general so matching the ORL of the driver to the board impedance helps minimize reflections and optimize signal quality. This is particularly evident in a direct modulated laser (DML) driver whose impedance is in the order of few Ohms making it difficult and not practical in terms of power dissipation to match it with that of the driver and the board traces. In addition, the characteristics of the optical signal generator can change over time, or from manufacture to manufacture, and even from one manufacturing run to the next by the same manufacture. These changes over time, or from device to device, in view of the output return loss requirements, present challenges when designing and implementing optic based communication systems because changes over time or between devices degrade impedance matching and therefore signal quality.
Prior art attempts to optimize ORL include use of a matching network using resistors, capacitors, inductors or a combination thereof to minimize output return loss. While this provide some benefit at lower frequencies or for bandpass applications, it does not solve the prior art problems with broadband applications which include high frequency signals. For example, too high of a capacitance of the driver/laser reduces or inhibits operation at high frequency. Therefore, there is a need in the art for matching impedance and obtaining as close as possible to ideal output return loss (ORL) for drivers and biasing systems for optical signal generators, such as a transmitting laser or any other type of optical modulator.
To overcome the drawbacks of the prior art, a distributed driver for an optic signal generator comprising a driver input configured to receive an input signal and an output configured to provide an output signal to the optic signal generator. A distributed driver for an optic signal generator is disclosed that has two or more amplifier cells. The cells have an amplifier cell input configured to receive the input signal, one or more amplifiers configured to amplify the received signal to create an amplified signal, and an amplifier cell output. Also part of this embodiment is a input path that connects to the amplifier cell input to receive the input signal and distribute the input signal to the two or more amplifier cells. The input path includes one or more inductors that cancel parasitic capacitance from the two or more amplifier cells. A output path connects to the amplifier cell output of the two or more amplifier cells to receive the amplified signal. The output path includes one or more inductors that cancel parasitic capacitance from the two or more amplifier cells.
It is contemplated that an inductor from the input path and an inductor from the output path may be associated with each amplifier cell. In one embodiment, the combination of the amplifier parasitic capacitance and the inductors in the input path and the output path form a transmission line that tunes out the parasitic capacitance of the two or more amplifiers. This embodiment may also include one or more variable capacitors that are part of one or more amplifier cells such that the variable capacitors are configured to tune a capacitance of one or more amplifier cells to optimize output return loss. The distributed driver further includes a biasing cell connected to each amplifier cell such that the biasing cell distributes a biasing cell capacitance to each amplifier cell and the one or more inductors cancel the biasing cell capacitance.
Described another way and in an alternatively embodiment, a first amplifier cell includes a first amplifier cell input, one or more amplifiers, and a first amplifier cell output. The first amplifier cell is configured to receive and amplify the input signal to create a first amplified signal on the first amplifier cell output. A second amplifier cell includes a second amplifier cell input, one or more amplifiers, and a second amplifier cell output. The second amplifier cell is configured to receive and amplify the input signal to create a second amplified signal on the second amplifier cell output. Also part of this embodiment is a first conductive path and a second conductive path. The first conductive path connects the driver input to the first amplifier cell input and the second amplifier cell input. The first conductive path carries the input signal to the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell such that an inductance of the first conductive path counteracts a capacitance associated with the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell. The second conductive path connects the driver output to the first amplifier cell output and the second amplifier cell output. Additional amplifier cells may be added, such as the four shown in the figures, or any number subject to the particular application and that the capacitance of the amplifier cells cancelled or tuned out with the inductors to optimize output return loss.
The second conductive path carries the first amplified signal and the second amplifier signal to the driver output, such that an inductance of the second conductive path counteracts the capacitance associated with the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell. A first variable capacitor in located in the first amplifier cell and is configured to selectively tune the capacitance of the first amplifier cell. Likewise, a second variable capacitor is located in the second amplifier cell and is configured to selectively tune the capacitance of the second amplifier cell. Also part of this embodiment is a first and second bias cell. The first bias cell is connected to the first amplifier cell and is configured to bias the optic signal generator while the second bias cell connects to the second amplifier cell and is configured to bias the optic signal generator.
In one embodiment, the first conductive path includes one or more inductors and the second conductive path includes one or more inductors. The distributed driver may be configured as a differential pair. The driver may further comprise additional amplifiers cells having a configuration that is the same as the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell. In one configuration one or more termination resistors connect to the first conductive path and one or more termination resistors connect to the second conductive path. It is contemplated that the first bias cell and the second bias cell do not include or require an inductor located on a circuit board.
Also disclosed herein is a distributed driver for an optic signal generator comprising driver input configured to receive an input signal and an output configured to provide an output signal to the optic signal generator. A first amplifier cell is configured to receive and amplify the input signal to create a first amplified signal while a second amplifier cell is configured to receive and amplify the input signal to create a second amplified signal. Also part of this embodiment is a first conductive path and a second conductive path. The first conductive path connects the driver input to the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell. An inductance is part of the first conductive path and it counteracts a capacitance of the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell. Similarly, the second conductive path connects the driver output to the first amplifier cell output and the second amplifier cell output. The second conductive path provides the first amplified signal and the second amplified signal to the driver output, such that an inductance that is part of the second conductive path counteracts the capacitance of the first amplifier cell and the second amplifier cell.
In one embodiment, the first conductive path includes one or more inductors and the second conductive path includes one or more inductors. The distributed driver may be configured as a differential pair. This driver may include a first variable capacitor in the first amplifier cell that is configured to selectively tune the capacitance of the first amplifier cell and a second variable capacitor in the second amplifier cell configured to selectively tune the capacitance of the second amplifier cell. In one configuration, a first bias cell is connected to the first amplifier cell. The first bias cell is configured to bias the optic signal generator. A second bias cell is connected to the second amplifier cell such that the second bias cell is configured to bias the optic signal generator.
In one embodiment, additional amplifier cells are included. It is contemplated that one or more termination resistors may connect to the first conductive path and one or more termination resistors may connect to the second conductive path. In one variation, the first bias cell and the second bias cell do not have an inductor located on a circuit board. The optic signal generator may be a laser or any other type of optical modulator
Also disclosed herein is a method for amplifying, with a distributed amplifier, a received signal for driving an optic signal generator. This method includes receiving an input signal that is to be transmitted on an optic fiber as an optic signal and then distributing the input signal to two or more amplifier cells over an input path having an inductance. The input path inductance cancels a parasitic capacitance of the two or more amplifier cells. Then, amplifying the input signal with the two or more amplifier cells to generate amplified output signals and combining the amplified output signals from the two or more amplifiers on an output path. The output path has an inductance that cancels a parasitic capacitance of the two or more amplifier cells. The amplified output signal is provided on an output from the distributed amplifier such that the output connects to the output path.
In one embodiment, this method further includes biasing the optic signal generator with two or more bias cells which are distributed such that two or more amplifier cells have at least one bias cell. In one configuration, the step of biasing the optic signal generator occurs without use of an inductor external to the integrated circuit chip which is located on a circuit board. The step of biasing the optic signal generator distributes capacitance associated with the two or more bias cells to the two or more amplifiers, the input path, and the output path. This method may further comprise adding a variable amount of capacitance to at least one of the two or more amplifier cells. The amount of variable capacitance is adjusted to ensure that the output return loss (ORL) of the driver matches the desire
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
To improve performance and overcome the drawbacks of the prior art, a distributed amplifier and biasing architecture is disclosed for use in silicon technology and other technologies.
Connected to the input node 108 is a first gain stage 120A and a first stage inductor 124. A capacitance, shown as capacitor 132, 136, associated with each amplifier cell 120A is parasitic and is part of the first gain stage, and thus not a separate element. This arrangement repeats through one or more additional gain stages 120B, 120C, 120D as shown. Four exemplary gain stages are shown in
Each amplifier stage (driver stage) may comprise two or more drivers. The drivers may be single ended or differential. As shown, more than one gain cell, that is shown as circuit blocks, amplify an input signal. In the following description input and output of a circuital block will be described as with single ended or differential, but the same concepts and features can be easily applied to single ended or differential input/outputs.
As shown in
The input node 108 of the first gain cell 120A is connected to the output of a pre-driver directly (as shown) or through an inductor/transmission line. The output of the first gain cell 120A is connected to the output of the second gain cell 120B through another inductor 148A or a transmission line, the output of the second gain cell 120B is connected to the output of the third gain cell 120C through another inductor 148B or a transmission line. The output of the third gain cell 120C is connected to the output of the fourth gain cell 120D through another inductor 148C or a transmission line. The output of the last gain cell 120D is connected to output node 112 directly (as shown) or through an inductor/transmission line. The output node 112 connects to the optic signal generator, such as a laser. In other embodiments, a greater or fewer number of amplifier (gain) cell may be implemented.
The output of the first gain cell 120A is connected to a termination element 140 directly (as shown) or through an inductor/transmission line. Termination resistors 140, 150 are associated with the first gain cell (amplifier stage) 120A and the last gain cell (amplifier stage) 120D. In other embodiments, additional resistor may be placed in the driver circuit. The resistors 140, 150 may be selected based on various design constrains and preferences such as power consumption, maximum operating frequency, input and output impedance, and the load. The resistance typically ranges from 20 ohms to 100 ohms but are driven and determined by system requirements. The signal propagates through the gain cells 120A, 120B, 120C, 120D towards the output node 112.
In one exemplary implementation, the gain cell includes at least two stages of amplification, such as two cascaded differential amplifiers. This arrangement is useful to maintain stability of the laser driver because it improves isolation between input and outputs of the gain stages, particularly in silicon technologies which are not as good at isolation as compared to other technologies. This configuration also reduces or eliminates oscillation. The two gain stage cells provide good isolation without wasting voltage output dynamic (that is a critical specification for laser driver), as opposed to a single gain stage with cascoded output. By spreading the driver system (amplifier) across several stages or cells, the isolation is increased, as compared to if each gain cell was a single amplifier. Failure to provide enough isolation between input and output of the gain cell may create instability in the system and lead to oscillations. In addition, by establishing a distributed system, the capacitance is spread between stages, which in addition to the inductors, reduces capacitances and allows the values of the inductors associated with the gain cells to be selected to provide impedance matching to the output load. Stated another way, by spreading the capacitance in the gains cells as shown, the capacitance essentially disappears.
The inductance is in or part of the core of the amplifiers. The inductors combined with the parasitic capacitor form a transmission line over which the signal propagates. The gain cells (with its parasitic capacitors) and inductors appear as gain stages connected by a transmission line.
Additional inductors 324A, 324B, 324C and 324D are provide and associated with the second leg of the differential pair along the input path at the bottom of
It is also contemplated that an exemplary circuit level configuration of a variable capacitance system utilizes multiple branches of transistors configured as switches in series with different value capacitors. The control of the switches occurs by forcing the gate of the transistors to a voltage corresponding to the on state for the transistor and by adjusting the source and drain voltage through high value resistors in such a way that the switches would be turned on or off depending on the voltage at the source and drain Controlling the on and off switching of the transistors in turn adjusts the capacitance because the transistors will connector more or fewer capacitors to the output path. This adjusts the amount of variable capacitance in the output pair in the differential pair configuration where the structure described is connected between the differential pair output. In a single ended configuration, the variable capacitance is established between output and ground. The high value series resistance used to control the source and drain voltage reduces the parasitic capacitance when the transistor (switch) is off as compared to transistors which are controlled by a gate voltage. This is but one possible arrangement of circuitry.
Use of variable capacitance allows the distributed amplifier (driver) to be capacitance tuned. For example, if during manufacturing the capacitance changes from that expected, the capacitance may be adjusted using one or more variable capacitors. Likewise, laser capacitance may vary from one manufacturing run to the next or if the laser changes from original design or based on the load in general. In one example embodiment, a programmable or variable capacitor is implemented using a 3 bit programmable, NMOS switch in a differential configuration.
Also disclosed herein is a optical signal generator driver that includes an improved bias circuit.
Stated another way, the proposed solution split the bias circuit in several cells or circuits, called bias circuits 708A, 708B, 708C, 708D. The bias circuit 708 connects to the output node of a gain cell 320. In this arrangement, the capacitance of the bias circuit 708 is absorbed into the artificial transmission line (which has inductance) that connects the driver cells 320 and there is no need for an external ferrite/inductor for capacitance isolation. It is contemplated that each gain cell or stage would include a bias circuit. However, in other embodiments, a fewer number than all the driver cells 320 may be configured with bias circuits 708. Moreover, this implementation allows the implementation of the driver with one less pin potentially allowing for a smaller, less expensive package.
The output of the driver and biasing module 912 provides the amplified signal (with biasing) to the optic signal generator 916, such as a laser, or any other type device capable of generating an optic signal for transmission over a fiber optic cable or other optic signal carrying medium. Optical signal generators that may be used with the driver disclosed herein are: direct modulated lasers (DMLs), EMLs (Electroabsorptive Modulated Lasers), VCSELs (Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers), LEDs (Light Emitting diodes), PICs (photonic integrated circuits) and other optical modulators The generated optic signal is provided to a fiber optic cable 920, which carries the optic signal to a remotely located receiver 924.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of this invention. In addition, the various features, elements, and embodiments described herein may be claimed or combined in any combination or arrangement.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/381,521 filed on Aug. 30, 2016 titled Driver with Distributed Architecture.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3661443 | Harris | May 1972 | A |
4534064 | Giacometti et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4545078 | Wiedeburg | Oct 1985 | A |
4687924 | Galvin et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4709416 | Patterson | Nov 1987 | A |
4734914 | Yoshikawa | Mar 1988 | A |
4747091 | Doi | May 1988 | A |
4772859 | Sakai | Sep 1988 | A |
4864649 | Tajima et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5019769 | Levinson | May 1991 | A |
5039194 | Block et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047835 | Chang | Sep 1991 | A |
5057932 | Lang | Sep 1991 | A |
5289302 | Eda | Feb 1994 | A |
5334826 | Sato et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5355422 | Sullivan | Oct 1994 | A |
5361038 | Allen | Nov 1994 | A |
5383046 | Tomofuji et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383208 | Queniat et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5392273 | Masaki et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394416 | Ries | Feb 1995 | A |
5396059 | Yeates | Mar 1995 | A |
5448629 | Bosch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471501 | Parr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5488627 | Hardin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491548 | Bell et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5510924 | Terui et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5532471 | Khorramabadi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550513 | Wong | Aug 1996 | A |
5557437 | Sakai et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574435 | Mochizuki et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5636254 | Hase et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5673282 | Wurst | Sep 1997 | A |
5710660 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5796501 | Sotom et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812572 | King et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822099 | Takamatsu | Oct 1998 | A |
5844928 | Shastri et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880640 | Dueme | Mar 1999 | A |
5900959 | Noda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926303 | Giebel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943152 | Mizrahi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953690 | Lemon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956168 | Levinson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978393 | Feldman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010538 | Sun et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014241 | Winter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020593 | Chow et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021947 | Swartz | Feb 2000 | A |
6023147 | Cargin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6049413 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055252 | Zhang | Apr 2000 | A |
6064258 | Shulman | May 2000 | A |
6064501 | Roberts et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081362 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108113 | Fee | Aug 2000 | A |
6111687 | Tammela | Aug 2000 | A |
6115113 | Flockencier | Sep 2000 | A |
H1881 | Davis et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6160647 | Gilliland et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175434 | Feng | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6259293 | Hayase et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262781 | Deter | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282017 | Kinoshita | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292497 | Nakano | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6333895 | Hamamoto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366373 | MacKinnon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388784 | Nakamura et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397090 | Cho | May 2002 | B1 |
6423963 | Wu | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6452719 | Kinoshita | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6473224 | Dugan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6494370 | Sanchez | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512617 | Tanji et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535187 | Wood | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556601 | Nagata | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570944 | Best et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6580328 | Tan et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6657488 | King et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661940 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6704008 | Naito et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707600 | Dijaili et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720826 | Yoon | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738578 | Mihota | May 2004 | B1 |
6740864 | Dries | May 2004 | B1 |
6759907 | Orr | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6798281 | Dueme | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801555 | Dijaili et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6828857 | Paillet et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836185 | Pobanz | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836493 | Mahowald et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837625 | Schott et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852966 | Douma et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862047 | Hibi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864751 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868104 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879217 | Visocchi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888123 | Douma et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909731 | Lu | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934307 | DeCusatis et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934479 | Sakamoto et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941077 | Aronson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952531 | Aronson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6956643 | Farr et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957021 | Aronson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967320 | Chieng et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7005901 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7031574 | Huang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039082 | Stewart et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046721 | Grohn | May 2006 | B2 |
7049759 | Roach | May 2006 | B2 |
7050720 | Aronson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058310 | Aronson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066746 | Togami et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7079775 | Aronson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7127391 | Chang et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145928 | Maxim | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7184671 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7193957 | Masui et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206023 | Belliveau | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215891 | Chiang et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7233206 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265334 | Draper et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269194 | Diaz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276682 | Draper et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286726 | Keil | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7315206 | Leyten | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7357513 | Watson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381935 | Sada et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7403064 | Chou et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7453475 | Nitta et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7504610 | Draper | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505497 | Xu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7692417 | Dagher | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7741908 | Furuta | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7804357 | Shigematsu | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8094692 | Nakamura | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8274335 | Chatwin | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8837542 | Yang | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9065407 | Zou | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088122 | Moto | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9151604 | Dunne | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9419410 | Usuki | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9698023 | Itabashi | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20010046243 | Schie | Jan 2001 | A |
20020015305 | Bornhorst et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020085600 | Jung | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097467 | Terahara et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105982 | Chin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130977 | Hibi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140378 | Volk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181823 | Ibukuro | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030030756 | Kane et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043869 | Vaughan | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053003 | Nishi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067662 | Brewer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030112075 | Betti-Berutto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122057 | Han et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151396 | Self | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040032890 | Murata | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047635 | Aronson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091005 | Hofmeister | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095976 | Bowler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101007 | Bozso | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114650 | Tanaka | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136727 | Androni et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160996 | Giorgi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040208526 | Mibu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240041 | Tian et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024023 | Chang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050024142 | Sowlati | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062530 | Bardsley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050147136 | Pobanz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180280 | Hoshino et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185149 | Lurkens et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050215090 | Harwood | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243879 | Horiuchi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265709 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060114954 | Wong et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125557 | Manstretta | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060192899 | Ogita | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060239308 | Husain | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261893 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280211 | Garez | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070058089 | Wang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081130 | May et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098026 | Uesaka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159434 | Yen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070195208 | Miyazawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202215 | Lak | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229718 | Hall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263685 | Takasou | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286609 | Ikram et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012508 | Steele et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024469 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055005 | Nam et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068066 | Mittal | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074562 | Endo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080231209 | Shiwaya et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246893 | Boss et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080303499 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309407 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090148094 | Kucharski et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090238226 | Moto | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243717 | Bonthron | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268767 | Nelson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100102884 | Takaso | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100164396 | Lindeberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172384 | Groepl | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100183318 | Tanaka | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110062874 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069960 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110147596 | Ishida | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110227648 | Mohammadi | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227649 | Montalvo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120201260 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120299660 | Arkiszewski | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130050289 | Kang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070796 | Belloni | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130229699 | Tatsumi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140023374 | Yuda | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140118083 | Shastry | May 2014 | A1 |
20140226147 | Metzler | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233594 | Tatsuo | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140320212 | Kalantari et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150229408 | Ding | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150295547 | Blednov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160065149 | Shaw | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070123 | Tatsumi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072462 | Itabashi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170054510 | Zortea | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170371363 | Habu | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180062589 | Bazzani | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
606161 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1471671 | Dec 2004 | EP |
EP 2249492 | Nov 2010 | EP |
58140175 | Aug 1983 | JP |
62124576 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62235975 | Oct 1987 | JP |
62281485 | Dec 1987 | JP |
05152660 | Jun 1993 | JP |
2001-119250 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2004-045989 | Feb 2004 | JP |
WO 9321706 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 02063800 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2004098100 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zhang, Tao, et al., “10-Gb/s Distributed Amplifier-Based VCSEL Driver IC With ESD Protection in 130-nm CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration Systems, vol. 24 Issue 7, Jan. 7, 2016, pp. 2502-2510. |
Single-Ended vs. Differential Methods of Driving a Laser Diode, Maxim Integrated TM, Application Note: HFAN-2.5.0, Rev. 5; Oct. 2008, 5 pages. |
Miller Effect—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_effect, Mar. 9, 2015. |
Yuan, 2007, Springer, XVIII, pp. 20-21. |
Analog Devices, Background information about wireless communications. Date unknown, http://rf.rfglobalnet.com/library/applicationnotes/files/7/bginfo.htm, 8 pages. |
A Low Noise, Wide Dynamic Range, Transimpedance Amplifier with Automatic Gain Control for SDH/SONET (STM16/OC48) in a 30GHz ft BiCMOS Process, Mihai A. T., Sanduleanu, Philips Research Eindhoven, Paul Manteman, Philips Semiconductors Nijmegen, Sep. 19, 2001, 19 pages. |
“PLL Design”, http://members.innet.net.au/˜richardh/PPH.htm, 9pages. |
“LCT3454-1A Synchronous Buck-Boost High Current LED Driver” Linear Technology, http://www.linear.com/product/LTC3454@Linear Technology, 12 pages. |
Garth Nash, “AN535 Application Notes-Phase-Locked Loop Design Fundamentals”, Motorola, Inc., 1994, 3 pages. |
Jamie Bailey “How DVD Works”, http://sweb.uky.edu/˜jrbai101/dvd.htm, May 1, 1999, pages. |
Tuan “Solace” Nguyen, “CD, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD, DD-RAM, DVD-RW, and MO”, Tweak3D.Net-Your Freakin' Tweakin Source!, http://www.tweak3d.net/articles/opticals/, May 13, 2000, 7 pages. |
“An Introduction to DVD-RW”, DVD White Paper, Pioneer New Media Technologies, Inc., Feb. 8, 2001, 8 pages. |
Ron Bertrand, “The Basics of PLL Frequency Synthesis”, Online Radio & Electronics Course, Apr. 2002, 9 pages. |
Richard Wilkinson “Topic: Selecting the Right DVD Mastering Technique”, DVD Technology Update, http://www.optical-disc.com/dvdupdate.html, 2002, 8 pages. |
Dr. John Rilum, “Mastering Beyond DVD Density”, http://www.optical-disc.com/beyonddvd.html, 2002, 7 pages. |
“CD Basics: The Bumps”, Howstuffworks “How CD Burners Work”, http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/cd-burner1.htm, 2004, 3 pages. |
Keith Szolusha, “Linear Technology Design Notes DC/DC Converter Drives Lumileds White LEDs from a Variety of Power Sources-Design Note 340”, Linear Technology Corporation, © Linear Technology Corporation 2004, date unknown, 2 pages. |
“An Introduction to DVD Recordable (DVD-R) What is DVD Recordable?” http://www.dvd-copy.com/reference/dvd_recordable.html, 2004, 8 pages. |
“Power Management, LED-driver considerations” Analog and Mixed-Signal Products, Analog Applications Journal, www.ti.com/sc/analogapps, Texas Instruments Incorporated, © 2005 Texas Instruments Incorporated, Michael Day, 5 pages. |
“Linear Technology LCT 3533 2A Wide Input Voltage Synchronous Buck-Boost DC/DC Converter”, © Linear Technology Corporation 2007, 16 pages. |
“National Semiconductor LM 3549 High Power Sequential LED Driver”, © 2010 National Semiconductor Corporation, www.national.com, Aug. 3, 2010, 20 pages. |
“TPS63020 TPS63021 High Efficiency Single Inductor Buck-Boost Converter With 4-A Switches”, Texas Instruments, Copyright © 2010, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Apr. 2010, 28 pages. |
“LT3476-High Current Quad Output LED Driver” Linear Technology,http://www.linear.com/product/LT3476, @2010 Linear Technology, 14 pages. |
“Current mirror” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_mirror, May 22, 2011, 8 pages. |
“Mosfet”Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOSFET, May 27, 2011, 24 pages. |
Abhijit Phanse, National Semiconductor, “Exercise 2: Define the time variance of a fiber optic channel's Impulse Response, and suggest a method for measuring it”, IEEE 802.3ae, Nov. 2000, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180062589 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62381521 | Aug 2016 | US |