1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a driving circuit for an electroluminescent device that receives a current and emits light (hereinafter referred to as an EL device) and to an active-matrix display apparatus that uses the driving circuit in displaying an image.
2. Description of the Related Art
Recently, a display apparatus using an EL device has attracted attention as a replacement for a display apparatus using a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD). In particular, a current-controlled organic EL device, whose emission brightness is controlled by a current passing through the device, is being actively developed. Also being developed is a color display panel that includes many organic EL devices of three colors having different emission wavelengths aligned on a substrate with driving circuits.
A current-writing driving circuit, which is tolerant of variations in characteristics of used thin-film transistor (TFT) elements, is typically employed. In this case, a display signal supplied to a signal line is a current signal.
A driving circuit 1 illustrated in
The driving circuit 1 further includes a switching transistor M2 for opening and closing between its drain and the drain of the drive transistor M3. The driving circuit 1 further includes the switching transistors M1 and M4. When the switching transistor M2 is on (it is closed as the switch), the switching transistor M1 is on and guides a signal current of the signal line data to the drain of the drive transistor M3. When the switching transistors M1 and M2 are off, the switching transistor M4 is on and passes a drain current of the drive transistor M3 through the EL device “EL” as a drive current. The switching transistors M1, M2, and M4 are current-path switching units configured to switch the passage of the drain current of the drive transistor M3 between a path for a signal current and a path for a drive current.
The driving circuit 1 is connected to a light emitting power source line PVdd, the signal line data, and the scanning lines P1 and P2. Writing operation and illuminating operation are performed on the driving circuit 1. In writing, P1 is H, P2 is L, the drive transistor M3 is in a diode-connected state, and a signal current Idata supplied from the signal line passes. In accordance with the magnitude of this current, a voltage occurs between the source and the gate, and a storage capacitor C1 is charged.
In illuminating, P1 is L, P2 is H, and the drain terminal of the drive transistor M3 is connected to the current-injected terminal (in this case, the anode terminal) of the EL device. Because the gate of the drive transistor M3 is separated from the drain, a voltage charged in the storage capacitor C1 in writing is maintained which is the gate voltage of the drive transistor M3. A current corresponding to it passes through the drain. The voltage of the storage capacitor C1 depends on a gate-source threshold voltage of the drive transistor M3 and the relationship between the drain current and the drain-source voltage (hereinafter referred to as the current-voltage characteristic). The drain current of the drive transistor M3 determined by the circuit is substantially the same as the signal current Idata because the difference between the threshold voltage and the current-voltage characteristic is negated. Therefore, the EL device is illuminated at brightness corresponding to the signal current Idata.
EL devices exhibit a deterioration phenomenon in which long-time illumination causes a decrease in brightness.
The way in which deterioration progresses depends on the length of an elapsed time and the magnitude of a current passing in the elapsed time. Because the degree of deterioration of a pixel illuminated for a long time and that of its surrounding pixel are different, even if a displayed image is switched to one in which these pixels have the same brightness, the long-time displayed image remains as a “burned-in” image which can be seen. In particular, for a digital camera or a portable device, each which have indications for, for example, capturing information, a clock, and various states, are displayed at one fixed position on the screen, so these displayed indications are likely to be “burned-in”. “Burned-in” images are said to be identifiable even with a brightness difference of approximately 2%. Therefore, it is necessary that (L1−L2)/L1 be less than 2% where the product guarantee period is the period from T1 to T2, L1 is the brightness at the time T1 when the initial deterioration period elapses, and L2 is the brightness at the elapsed time T2.
However, it is difficult to make the decrease in the brightness of present EL devices less than 2% because their product guarantee periods vary from approximately to 100,000 hours. As a result, “burn-in” is a serious problem.
The present invention provides a driving circuit for a light-emitting device. The driving circuit outputs a drive current from an output terminal to the light-emitting device in accordance with a signal current input from an input terminal. The driving circuit includes a drive transistor, a capacitor connected between a gate and a source of the driving transistor, a resistance device and a first switch arranged in series between a drain of the drive transistor and the input terminal, a second switch configured to connect the gate of the drive transistor and a first terminal of the resistance device when the first switch is closed, the first terminal being more remote from the drive transistor, and a third switch disposed in a path through which a drain current of the drive transistor flows from the output terminal to the light-emitting device. The resistance device is configured to increase its resistance in accordance with a cumulative amount of a passing current.
According to an aspect of the present invention, an EL panel can be made in which deterioration caused by its illumination history of a light-emitting device of each pixel is reduced while a simple structure is used.
According to another aspect of the present invention, deterioration of a light-emitting device of each pixel can be compensated without having to use an external memory, such as random-access memory (RAM) or more expensive read-only memory (ROM). Consequently, the present invention can provide an EL panel whose deterioration is compensated and whose cost is not affected by an increase in the number of pixels with higher definition.
Further, without the need for external memory, the detection between terminals of an EL device and measurement of the current passing through the EL device do not need a deterioration detecting operation that can be unstable and that would require more time to apply the correct voltage. Therefore, an EL panel can be made that is capable of displaying a normal screen free from “burn-in” without causing a product user to see an EL deterioration phenomenon (burn-in) immediately after the power is turned on.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments (with reference to the attached drawings).
For a light-emitting device, its deterioration reduces the brightness and also changes (typically increases) the terminal voltage. In the driving circuit illustrated in
The present invention can be used in a display apparatus that employs an organic EL light-emitting device (hereinafter abbreviated as a light-emitting device). A decrease in brightness of the light-emitting device is used to determine and create a voltage change in a model device that simulates a deterioration. In accordance with that voltage change, a current passing through the light-emitting device is increased. When the current that is passing through a model EL device set for each driving circuit stays the same, increases, or decreases by a fixed factor, the voltage of the model device changes with the progression of deterioration of the light-emitting device. Passing a current compensated to a signal current through the light-emitting device in accordance with the voltage change of the model device enables the brightness to be maintained constantly to the signal current.
The model device is used within a driving circuit for each of the light-emitting devices of the display apparatus. The model device is a resistance device that has characteristics in which its resistance is raised by a continuously passing current, and thus, the voltage between terminals rises.
If the same drive current as that output from the driving circuit is passed through the resistance device, the same current as that passing through the light-emitting device is passed through the resistance device for the same period of time. Alternatively, if, while a signal current is written in the driving circuit, the same signal current passes through the resistance device, the same current as that passing through the light-emitting device passes through the resistance device for a period of time determined by the ratio of the writing time to the light-emitting time. In either case, because the cumulative amount of current proportional to the cumulative amount of current in the light-emitting device is present in the resistance device, the change in the resistance allows the amount of decrease in brightness of the light-emitting device to be determined. Thus the resistance device is a model of deterioration of the light-emitting device. Hereinafter, this resistance device is referred to as the deterioration model device.
The deterioration model device will be described next using specific examples.
One example of a device whose terminal voltage changes with a cumulative amount of current (=current×time) is a reverse junction resistance of a p-n diode illustrated in
The arrangement illustrated in
Because the driving circuit is formed from p-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (PMOS) and complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) transistors, the p-n junction can be formed by the same manufacturing process as in the driving circuit. The magnitude of the terminal voltage can be adjusted by a change in a parameter of the p-n junction. The amount of change to the cumulative amount of current can be adjusted by use of the width of the p-n junction. When deterioration characteristics of the light-emitting device differ among R, G, and B, the width of the p-n junction may be set in accordance with their respective deterioration characteristics.
Best mode of the driving circuit for the light-emitting device according to an aspect of the present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the drawings.
First Embodiment
A driving circuit 1 illustrated in
The signal current Idata is input to the driving circuit 1 by a transistor M1. The node where the source of the transistor M1 is connected to the signal line data is an input terminal of the driving circuit 1. The drive current to pass through the light-emitting device EL is supplied from the drain of a drive transistor M3. The drain of the drive transistor M3 is an output terminal of the driving circuit 1.
The driving circuit 1 illustrated in
In
The transistor M4 is disposed between the drain of the drive transistor M3 and the light-emitting device EL and serves as the third switch guiding a drain current of the drive transistor M3 to the light-emitting device EL as a drive current when being closed. The third switch may be disposed at any location in a path for the drive current. For example, the third switch may be disposed downstream of the light-emitting device EL.
The driving circuit 1 in
The resistance device Y1 is a deterioration model device. Either one of the deterioration model device illustrated in
Operation of the driving circuit illustrated in
The deterioration model device Y1 is in a state in which it is free from “deterioration” caused by a current. The voltage between the terminals occurring when the signal current Idata passes through is an initial value Vy1. During a writing period, a first terminal of the two terminals of the deterioration model device is connected to the gate of the drive transistor M3, the first terminal being opposite to a second terminal connected to the drain terminal of the drive transistor M3. Therefore, the drain voltage Vd1 and the gate voltage Vg1 of the drive transistor M3 are determined according to the signal current Idata and have the relationship given by:
Vg1−Vd1=Vy1(Idata)
The curve A in
The curve “a” in
When the terminal voltage of the light-emitting device EL to the signal current Idata is Ve1, the drain voltage of the drive transistor M3 is Vd=(PVdd−Ve1). Because the drive transistor M3 operates in accordance with the curve A in
At this time, “deterioration” caused by current is present in the deterioration model device Y1. As a result, the voltage Vy2 between the terminals occurring when the signal current Idata passes through is larger than the initial value. At this time, because the same signal current Idata passes, the gate voltage Vg2 of the drive transistor M3 is larger than the gate voltage Vg1, whereas the drain voltage Vd2 is smaller than the drain voltage Vd1. They have the relationship given by:
Vg2−Vd2=Vy2(Idata)
The curve B in
Accordingly, the provision of the deterioration model device Y1 between the gate and the source of the drive transistor M3 enables an increase in the voltage between the terminals of the deterioration model device Y1 to be reflected to the gate voltage of the drive transistor M3, i.e., the voltage of the storage capacitor.
Because the gate voltage Vg of the drive transistor M3 is larger than that in the initial state, the current Id2 passing through the light-emitting device EL is larger than the current Id1 in the initial state. This is a change of a direction in which decrease in brightness of the light-emitting device is compensated. The increase in the gate voltage Vg results from the increase in the voltage Vy between the terminals of the deterioration model device. Therefore, a brightness decrease can be negated by adjustment of a change over time in the voltage between the terminals of the deterioration model device so as to match with a change over time in the brightness of the light-emitting device.
The ratio Id2/Id1 of current of the light-emitting device subsequent to deterioration to that prior thereto when the voltage change Vy2−Vy1 of the deterioration model device is fixed is a parameter that indicates the deterioration compensating performance of the drive transistor M3. This ratio depends on the conductance of the drive transistor M3, and thus, it can be changed by changing the design.
The slope of the drain current in the saturated region of the drive transistor M3 and the increase in the voltage between the terminals of the light-emitting device are factors to reduce the deterioration compensating performance. They can be accommodated by an increase in the voltage change of the deterioration model device as long as the slope of the drain current is not extremely large.
In the driving circuit according to the present embodiment, a current is supplied to the deterioration model device Y1 only for a writing period. Therefore, the cumulative value of current in the deterioration model device and that in the light-emitting device are significantly different. In the case of a QVGA display panel having 262.5 scanning lines, the ratio of cumulative current amount in the deterioration model device to that in the light-emitting device is 1/261.5. In this case, the deterioration model device is set so as to “deteriorate” faster than the brightness change of the light-emitting device by 261.5 times. That is, it is necessary that the voltage change is adjusted to be large in accordance with this magnification.
Second Embodiment
Operation in a writing period is the same as in the first embodiment. In an illumination period, a current passes in series through the deterioration model device and the light-emitting device EL. Therefore, the curves a and b in
The deterioration model device Y1 is disposed in both a path for signal current and a path for drive current. Therefore, the same current passes through the deterioration model device Y1 and the light-emitting device EL for the most part of a period of time, so substantially the same cumulative amount of current is present therein. As a result, unlike the first embodiment, it is unnecessary to adjust the deterioration speed by use of current time duty.
Third Embodiment
The resistance device described with reference to
Of the diodes Y2 and Y3, the diode Y2 is more remote from the drive transistor M3. The diode Y2 is connected in a direction opposite to a signal current path. A signal current passes through the diode Y3, which is more adjacent to the drive transistor M3, in the forward direction. The diode Y2 is the one in which its voltage between the terminals changes in accordance with a cumulative amount of signal current.
A transistor M5 is connected to both ends of the deterioration model device Y2+Y3. In the circuit illustrated in
The device illustrated in
Fourth Embodiment
In a display region 2, pixels are arranged in a matrix with rows (horizontally in
The driving circuit 1 is connected to a signal line 4 for a corresponding column and a scanning line 7 for a corresponding row. A control signal from the scanning line 7 selecting a row causes the driving circuit 1 for the selected row to capture a display signal supplied to the corresponding signal line 4. When the control signal from the scanning line moves to the next row, each driving circuit 1 illuminates its associated EL device at the brightness corresponding to the captured display signal.
A control signal supplied through each of the scanning lines 7 is generated by a row register 6 including register blocks for receiving a row clock KR and a row scanning start signal SPR. The number of the row registers 6 is the same as the number of the rows.
A display signal to be supplied to the signal lines 4 is generated by column control circuits 3 arranged for the columns of the EL devices. The number of the column control circuits 3 is the same as the number of the columns. Each of the column control circuits 3 is composed of three systems of R, G, and B. An image signal VIDEO for a corresponding color is input to each system of the column control circuit 3. The column control circuit 3 generates a display signal in synchronization with a sampling signal SP shared by RGB and a horizontal control signal 8 and supplies it to the signal line 4 at a corresponding column.
A horizontal synchronization signal SC corresponding to the image signal VIDEO is input to a control circuit 9. The control circuit 9 generates the horizontal control signal 8. The sampling signal SP is generated by a column register 5 including registers whose number is one third of the number of the column control circuits 3. A column clock KC, a column scanning start signal SPC, and the horizontal control signal 8 used for mainly performing reset operation for the column register are input to the column register 5.
When displaying a test image continues, the voltage of the deterioration model device Y1 changes depending on the cumulative amount of current in each of the light-emitting devices. Because the drive current differs among pixels, the amount of change in the voltage differs among the deterioration model device. As a result, if the whole screen is made white after a set period of time elapses, the whole screen has a uniform emission brightness. Therefore, the test image is not identified as burned-in.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Application No. 2007-249145 filed Sep. 26, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007-249145 | Sep 2007 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5302871 | Matsuzaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5963184 | Tokunaga et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6188378 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6335720 | Mori et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348910 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373454 | Knapp et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6552709 | Yamaguchi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559824 | Kubota et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587086 | Koyama | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6661180 | Koyama | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7126565 | Kawasaki et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7242397 | Iseki et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253812 | Sasaki | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259735 | Kasai | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7532207 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605899 | Shikina et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7692643 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7812812 | Yoshinaga et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817116 | Kimura | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7911425 | Goden et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020047581 | Koyama | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030058687 | Kimura | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040155843 | Sasaki | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183752 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050007316 | Akimoto et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007319 | Shin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041002 | Takahara et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050122150 | Iseki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050285151 | Kawasaki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060061529 | Kim | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114194 | Kawasaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060114195 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132395 | Kawasaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060187185 | Yoshinaga et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060267509 | Yang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070132719 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070257867 | Kasai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257868 | Kasai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007494 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080157828 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158112 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080259000 | Kawasaki | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090015571 | Kawasaki et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033599 | Kawasaki et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090066615 | Kawasaki | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085908 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102853 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109144 | Goden et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121980 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135110 | Nakamura et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090231239 | Goden et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090289966 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100026677 | Shikina et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073267 | Akimoto et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100128160 | Maru et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100328365 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001689 | Maru et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025653 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090210 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1521719 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1770246 | May 2006 | CN |
1 429 312 | Jun 2004 | EP |
11-282417 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001-134229 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-159877 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2004-3411144 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-157322 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-030516 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008-268981 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-015516 | Dec 2008 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090085908 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |