Mobile communication devices including smart phones and the like have become widespread and highly popular. Their ubiquity has lead to major problems as such mobile devices are all-too-often being used at inappropriate times such as when driving. This has created a desire by parents, guardians, employers and others to monitor the use of mobile devices and to restrict their use during driving. However, overly restricting use of mobile devices can be impractical, may end up sacrificing the safety and convenience offered by such devices, and may lead to active circumvention of such restrictions. A system that supports reduced driving distractions to help keep a driver's attention on the road and away from his mobile device would be useful. Beneficially, such a system would deter use of the mobile device by blocking access to some or all of its functionality.
This Summary introduces simplified concepts that are further described below in the Detailed Description of Illustrative Embodiments. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter and is not intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A processor-implemented system is provided for controlling the functionality of a mobile device of a driver (also referred to as a first user) during driving so as to reduce driving distractions related to the mobile device. The invention can automatically enter a driving mode when driving is detected. The driving mode implements an alternate user interface (UI) that limits interactions with the mobile device in accord with predetermined restrictions. The driving mode may automatically screen incoming calls and texts while suppressing potentially-distracting notifications. The system implements a PIN-based mechanism that ensures user compliance while enabling an “opt-out” feature (“I'm Not Driving” button) that is usable under controlled circumstances. In addition to automatic entry the driving mode may be entered voluntarily.
Further provided is a computing system comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having encoded thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of the system, cause the system to perform a process. The process includes accessing sensor data of a mobile device, determining based on the sensor data that the mobile device is operating in a moving vehicle, and disabling a functional component of the mobile device based at least on determining that the mobile device is operating in a moving vehicle. An override request is received from a first user via the mobile device and the functional component is enabled responsive to the override request.
Further provided is non-transitory computer-readable media tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by at least one processor-enabled computing system to implement a method, the at least one computing system being capable of interfacing with a communications network. The method includes accessing sensor data of a mobile device, determining based on the sensor data that the mobile device is operating in a moving vehicle, and disabling a functional component of the mobile device based at least on determining that the mobile device is operating in a moving vehicle. An override request is received from a first user via the mobile device and the functional component is enabled responsive to the override request.
A more detailed understanding may be had from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the figures in the drawings and the detailed description are examples only and are not to be considered limiting as other implementations are possible. In the figures like reference numerals indicate like elements, and wherein:
The described illustrative embodiments are not limiting. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that many other embodiments are possible without deviating from the described basic concepts. The terms “a” and “an” as used herein do not denote a limitation of quantity but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced items.
A distraction reduction system 20 is provided that automatically runs on a mobile device to reduce distractions caused by the mobile device while driving. The distraction reduction system 20 described herein may be implemented as a processor-controlled system running in accord with a computer program. That program may be implemented in software or in firmware, and a copy of the program is preferably stored in one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage devices.
The distraction reduction system 20 is preferably configured as a top-layer mobile device application running on a processor-based mobile device that provides communications over a communication carrier's network.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Turning specifically to the memory 104, that memory includes non-transitory memory that retains both the operating system and the distraction reduction system 20 app of the mobile device. The memory 104 may also include temporary RAM as required to operate the mobile device 31.
The next level of abstract hierarchical progression is firmware 120, if required. Firmware 120 is useful for enabling upgrading of the mobile device 31 by storing in a non-volatile memory various settings such as model numbers, version numbers, and controlling bits which establish a set of functions and which may limit or restrict the capabilities of the mobile device 31. In practice, the network carrier 25 will often set the firmware 120 to work with the communication system 18 and with the capabilities desired by the network carrier 25.
Moving up the abstract hierarchical progression, above the firmware 120 is an operating system 124. The operating system 124 provides a set of core software programs that manage the hardware 102 and firmware 120 and that implement common services which support one or more applications, specifically including the distraction reduction system 20 app.
The operating system 124 includes a low-level “kernel” routine 126 that handles basic software integration to the firmware 120 and hardware 102 and that implements underlying functions. Over the kernel 126 is a set of core services 130 that while still basic may change from time to time or from family device to family device. The core services 130 are software functions that support the on-board services of the mobile device 31. The core services 130 may include software routines that support and enable the application framework such as graphics, web support, messaging, location finding (GPS), system security, connectivity, telephony and a file system. Importantly, the application framework should be understood as including apps.
Overlaying the operating system 124 is the distraction reduction system 20 app. The distraction reduction system 20 app may be installed after being downloaded from the network carrier 25, supplied by a third party provider, or input by the overseer 37. When installed, the overseer 37 inputs a PIN which prevents removal of the distraction reduction system 20 app. Once installed, the overseer 37 can set up the distraction reduction system 20 to implement one or more of its features.
The purpose of the distraction reduction system 20 is to improve safety by reducing distractions while driving. To do that the distraction reduction system 20 must first determine if the driver 35 is actually driving. This is performed using sensor 108 information such as GPS locations over time and/or motion sensor information which indicates driving motion. The CPU processor 106 acts under the commands of the software code of the distraction reduction system 20 to use senor data to determine that the mobile device 31 is operating in a moving vehicle based on the location data and/or sensor data, specifically including acceleration data from an accelerometer.
Once the mobile device 31 is determined to be in a moving vehicle, the distraction reduction system 20 causes the CPU processor 106 to adjust one or more of the settings 42 to disable or modify at least one of the features 40 of the mobile device 31 (reference
In some embodiments the distraction reduction system 20 determines whether the mobile device 31 is in a moving vehicle by determining the location of the mobile device 31 relative to road map data that is stored in the memory 104. In that case the at least one functional component becomes responsive to the location of the mobile device 31 relative to the road map data in the memory 104. Another approach to determining whether the mobile device 31 is in a moving vehicle is to use trajectory information from the sensor 108 relative to trajectory data stored in the memory 104. That trajectory data may be relative to stored road map data. In that case the at least one functional component becomes responsive to the trajectory of the mobile device 31.
Another approach to determining whether the mobile device 31 is in a moving vehicle is by using driving schedule data related to the driver 35 which is stored in the memory 104. In that case, enabling the at least one functional component is responsive to the driving schedule data.
Yet another approach to determining whether the mobile device 31 is in a moving vehicle is by using location data derived from cell tower triangulation. In that case enabling the at least one functional component is responsive to information from cell tower triangulation. Such triangulation can be cell or tower based.
A given mobile device 31 may have a number of features that are suitable for disablement to improve driving safety. For example, a mobile device 31 may have features such as voice calling, electronic text messaging, audio alerts and alarms, visual alerts and alarms, a vibration mode, and application extensions that may be totally or partially disabled. In particular, during driving the communication capability will usually be disabled. However, in practice the memory 104 may include a list of phone numbers or addresses such as a parent or emergency service or services that can selectively remain enabled even when driving.
As previously noted the distraction reduction system 20 is used to improve safety by reducing distractions while driving or performing other potentially hazardous tasks. Such a system is useless if not used. To ensure use the overseer 37 will ensure that the distraction reduction system 20 is installed on the mobile device 31. This may be performed by providing the mobile device 31 to the driver 35 with the distraction reduction system 20 already installed, by installing, or by coercing the driver 35 to install the distraction reduction system 20.
Once installed the distraction reduction system 20 must not be uninstalled, overridden, or modified, and it must be used. The distraction reduction system 20 includes features which ensure it is not removed, which forces compliance, and which allows the overseer 37 to customize the distraction reduction system 20 to fit the particular driver 35. To such ends the distraction reduction system 20 includes an “anti-tamper” functionality that prevents the distraction reduction system 20 from being uninstalled, overridden or modified without the permission of the overseer 37. The “anti-tamper” functionality includes both registering the distraction reduction system 20 app as having device administrator privileges and the use of a PIN. Once registered, to remove or modify the distraction reduction system 20 the device administrator privileges must first be removed and that removal requires entry of the PIN.
The overseer-created PIN also locks down relevant settings within the distraction reduction system 20. For example, the distraction reduction system 20 can be customized to allow the use of Bluetooth™ hands free devices that circumvent the ban on calls, to automatically engage when driving is detected, to allow the selection of particular apps that can be used while driving, and to allow the selection of phone numbers or address book contacts corresponding to calls which should not be blocked while driving. The PIN is required to make changes to any or all of these settings as well as turning off the PIN, changing the PIN, or changing which settings are protected by the PIN.
The distraction reduction system 20 implements an overriding opt-out feature that takes the form of an “I'm Not Driving” button 60 (see
The “I'm Not Driving” button 60 exists primarily because reliably distinguishing between when the driver 35 is driving a car and when the driver 35 is a passenger in a vehicle is difficult. Other false positives also exist such as the driver 35 riding on a bus or a train or some other alternate form of transportation. In such cases it is reasonable that the driver 35 does not need the enhanced safety provided by the distraction reduction system 20 such as when driving, and may want normal, unrestricted access to the full functionality of the mobile device 31.
It should also be understood that the driver 35 may on occasion need unrestricted access to their phone even while driving, such as when being followed or to contact emergency services. Thus the distraction reduction system 20 can be configured during set-up to allow use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 even when driving. The distraction reduction system 20 alternatively can be configured to not include the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 at all. This provides protection to the driver 35 while driving at the expense of not allowing unrestricted mobile device 31 access when being a passenger in a moving vehicle.
Another alternative opt-out approach is a “trust but verify” scheme which allows use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 but sends a time-stamped text to the overseer 37 each time it is used. This enables the overseer 37 to obtain a sense of when and how often the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 is used and whether an investigation into its use is appropriate. Support for the “trust but verify” scheme optionally may include providing the overseer 37 with an audit of the use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60. For example, a weekly log in which the overseer 37 can review past behavior. The “trust but verify” scheme may optionally require the driver 35 to provide support for use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60, such as a contemporaneous photo, video, and/or auditory recording of their environment to provide context for the audit.
Another opt-out approach is to provide a throttling number of uses of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60. After “N” uses of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 the distraction reduction system 20 removes the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 until reset either by the overseer 37 or automatically over time.
The distraction reduction system 20 can be configured to require that the driver 35 provide the overseer 37 with an explanation for the use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60. Reference for example
The distraction reduction system 20 also makes use of sensor data which may be combined with other data sources (e.g. a database of road geometries or public transit routes) to provide “smart” use of the “I'm Not Driving” button 60. For example, tracking the output of the GPS sensor against the database to determine if the mobile device 31 is on a specific road or on a bus line (in which case the “I'm Not Driving” button 60 might be automatically activated), the time of day or day of week the travel is detected, what other signals are detected (e.g. a Bluetooth or WiFi signal emanating from a car, signals emanating from other mobile phones), and clues from sensors of the mobile device 31 such as auditory (mic), visual (camera), tactile (touch screen), orientation (gyroscope), and acceleration (accelerometer). In use, the distraction reduction system 20 might recognize that the mobile device 31 is moving along a daily commute route in which the overseer 37 is confident that the driver 35 will be driving and therefore should have no access, or restricted access, to the “I'm Not Driving” button 60.
The foregoing descriptions support the various operations of the distraction reduction system 20.
Following step 204, the distraction reduction system 20 proceeds with set-up, step 206. That set up beneficially includes the overseer 37 specifying criteria for the “I'm not Driving” button 60 as well as the settings 42 that will be modified to control capabilities 44 of the mobile device 31. Step 206 may also include entry of phone numbers that should not be blocked even when driving, information for the memory 104 such as map information, and other data as described above. Step 206 may be used by the overseer 37 to control and fine tune the method or methods used to determine when the mobile device 31 is in a moving vehicle.
Following step 206 the distraction reduction system 20 begins detecting whether the driver 35 is driving, step 208. As noted above such a determination is not definitive as the driver 35 may simply be a passenger. If driving is not detected the method 200 ensures that the settings 42 for the non-driving mode are set, step 209, and a loop is run until driving is detected in step 208.
Once driving is detected the method 200 determines whether the detected driving should be overridden, step 210. Again, an override is appropriate when the driver 35 is a passenger or under other prescribed conditions. The override criteria were specified in step 206. If the distraction reduction system 20 is not to be overridden, the distraction reduction system 20 is run, step 212, settings are adjusted for a driving mode, and a loop is made back to step 208. That way, when driving ends the distraction reduction system 20 returns the mobile device 31 to its non-driving mode and waits until driving is once more detected.
However, if in step 210 the decision is made to override the driving mode the method 200 proceeds to step 214 in which the settings of the mobile device 31 are adjusted to an opt-out configuration. That configuration was set up in step 206.
Although features and elements are described above in particular combinations, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that each feature or element can be used alone or in any combination with the other features and elements. Methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6351556 | Loui et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6690940 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7313276 | Simelius et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7577246 | Idan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7689465 | Shakes et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7705726 | Graves et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7839891 | Allan | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7876704 | Bims et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7945470 | Cohen et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8024290 | Yang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027662 | Miller et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8095175 | Todd et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107432 | Seo | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135392 | Marcellino | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160560 | Geyer et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8351408 | Daigle | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8594065 | Polito et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8621075 | Luna | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8676640 | O'Neill et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8738688 | Myers et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010047286 | Walker et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020174180 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005306 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027603 | Takasaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040083472 | Rao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040268381 | Simelius et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060085547 | Cormier | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136236 | Horton | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184792 | Berlin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206895 | Gray et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070150567 | Lamparello | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070208802 | Barman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080246605 | Pfeffer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080299954 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002147 | Bloebaum et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090247124 | De Atley et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100037088 | Krivopaltsev et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100113013 | Karabinis | May 2010 | A1 |
20100154024 | Boxmeyer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100210254 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216509 | Riemer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110029598 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055546 | Klassen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093161 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110151830 | Blanda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110231280 | Farah | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244837 | Murata et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252375 | Chaudhri | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110269452 | Roumeliotis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110275321 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294520 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001548 | Recker et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036220 | Dare et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120081500 | Border et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120142379 | Park | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151047 | Hodges et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151384 | Stass et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179767 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188163 | Xiao | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192016 | Gotesdyner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195295 | Elmaleh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223861 | Kupfer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244883 | Tibbitts et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120258740 | Mildh et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260118 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271908 | Luna et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120323990 | Hayworth | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330702 | Kowalski et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130040629 | Sprigg et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047229 | Hoefel et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130111462 | Umansky et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130143512 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145007 | Randazzo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185411 | Martin | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198272 | Shionoya et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198296 | Roy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130303143 | Schrader | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316746 | Miller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332886 | Cranfill et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339345 | Soto Matamala et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346333 | Hassler et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140025465 | Herring et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140082065 | Anakata et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108649 | Barton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148192 | Hodges et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164037 | Rao et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140179261 | Riggs | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180438 | Hodges et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140187219 | Yang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140258357 | Singh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140310327 | Yip et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310365 | Sample et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337077 | Zsebedics et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140338006 | Grkov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140364153 | Ren | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140370857 | Bovis | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150120349 | Weiss | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150163664 | Martin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188777 | Frost | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,888, filed Oct. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/820,800, filed May 8, 2013 by Paul Zsebedics. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160014262 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |