The present invention relates to driving waveforms and a driving method for an electrophoretic display.
An electrophoretic display (EPD) is a non-emissive device based on the electrophoresis phenomenon of charged pigment particles suspended in a solvent. The display usually comprises two plates with electrodes placed opposing each other and one of the electrodes is transparent. A suspension composed of a colored solvent and charged pigment particles dispersed therein is enclosed between the two plates. When a voltage difference is imposed between the two electrodes, the pigment particles migrate to one side or the other, causing either the color of the pigment particles or the color of the solvent to be seen, depending on the polarity of the voltage difference.
The modern electrophoretic display application often utilizes the active matrix backplane to drive the images. The active matrix driving, however, may result in updating images from the top of the display panel to the bottom of the display panel in a non-synchronized manner. The present invention addresses such a deficiency.
The present invention is directed to a waveform for driving an electrophoretic display. The waveform comprises a plurality of driving frames and the driving frames have varying frame times.
In one embodiment, the driving frames at the transition time points of the waveform have a first frame time and the remaining driving frames have a second frame time.
In one embodiment, the first frame time is a fraction of the second frame time.
In one embodiment, the first frame time is about 5% to about 80% of the second frame time.
In one embodiment, the first frame time is about 5% to about 60%, of the second frame time.
In one embodiment, the waveform is a mono-polar waveform.
In one embodiment, the waveform is a bi-polar waveform.
The present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display. The method comprises applying the waveform of this invention to pixels.
An electrophoretic fluid 13 comprising charged pigment particles 15 dispersed in a solvent is filled in each of the display cells. The movement of the charged particles in a display cell is determined by the driving voltage associated with the display cell in which the charged particles are filled.
If there is only one type of pigment particles in the electrophoretic fluid, the pigment particles may be positively charged or negatively charged. In another embodiment, the electrophoretic display fluid may have a transparent or lightly colored solvent or solvent mixture and charged particles of two different colors carrying opposite charges, and/or having differing electro-kinetic properties.
The display cells may be of a conventional walled or partition type, a microencapsulated type or a microcup type. In the microcup type, the electrophoretic display cells may be sealed with a top sealing layer. There may also be an adhesive layer between the electrophoretic display cells and the common electrode. The term “display cell” therefore is intended to refer to a micro-container which is individually filled with a display fluid. Examples of “display cell” include, but are not limited to, microcups, microcapsules, micro-channels, other partition-typed display cells and equivalents thereof.
The term “driving voltage” is used to refer to the voltage potential difference experienced by the charged particles in the area of a pixel. The driving voltage is the potential difference between the voltage applied to the common electrode and the voltage applied to the pixel electrode. As an example, in a binary system, positively charged white particles are dispersed in a black solvent. When zero voltage is applied to a common electrode and a voltage of +15V is applied to a pixel electrode, the “driving voltage” for the charged pigment particles in the area of the pixel would be +15V. In this case, the driving voltage would move the positively charged white particles to be near or at the common electrode and as a result, the white color is seen through the common electrode (i.e., the viewing side). Alternatively, when zero voltage is applied to a common electrode and a voltage of −15V is applied to a pixel electrode, the driving voltage, in this case, would be −15V and under such −15V driving voltage, the positively charged white particles would move to be at or near the pixel electrode, causing the color of the solvent (black) to be seen at the viewing side.
There are driving frames 202 (or referred to as simply “frame” in this application) within the driving waveform as shown. When driving an EPD on an active matrix backplane, it usually takes many frames for the image to be displayed. During each frame, a voltage is applied to a pixel. For example, during frame period 202, a voltage of −V is applied to the pixel.
The length of a frame (i.e., frame time) is an inherent feature of an active matrix TFT driving system and it is usually set at 20 milli-second (msec). But typically, the length of a frame may range from 2 msec to 100 msec.
There may be as many as 1000 frames in a waveform period, but usually there are 20-40 frames in a waveform period.
An active matrix driving mechanism is often used to drive an electrophoretic display. In general, an active matrix display device includes a display unit on which the pixels are arranged in a matrix form. A diagram of the structure of a pixel is illustrated in
More specifically, a thin film transistor (TFT) array is composed of a matrix of pixels and pixel electrode region 351 (a transparent electric conducting layer) each with a TFT device 354 and is called an array. A significant number of these pixels together create an image on the display. For example, an EPD may have an array of 600 lines by 800 pixels/line, thus 480,000 pixels or TFT units.
A TFT device 354 is a switching device, which functions to turn each individual pixel on or off, thus controlling the number of electrons flow into the pixel electrode zone 351 through a capacitor 355. As the number of electrons reaches the expected value, TFT turns off and these electrons can be maintained.
The charged particles in a display cell corresponding to a pixel are driven to a desired location by a series of driving voltages (i.e., driving waveform) as shown in
In practice, the common electrode and the pixel electrodes are separately connected to two individual circuits and the two circuits in turn are connected to a display controller. The display controller sends waveforms, frame to frame, to the circuits to apply appropriate voltages to the common and pixel electrodes respectively. The term “frame” represents timing resolution of a waveform, as illustrated above.
For illustration purpose,
In
For a frame time of 20 msec and a display image of 800 pixels/line and 600 lines, the updating time for each line of pixels is about 33.33 micro-second (μsec). As shown in
The updating of the common electrode begins at time 0. Therefore, updating of the lines, except line 1, always lags behind updating of the common electrode. In this example, the updating of the last line lags behind the updating of the common electrode for almost one frame time of 20 msec.
As shown in the two figures, the mono-polar driving approach requires modulation of the common electrode. In both figures, the common electrode is applied a voltage of +V in phase I, a voltage of −V in phase II and a voltage of +V in phase III.
However, the pixel updating does not occur simultaneously across the entire display panel as shown in
It is noted that while the shift is most pronounced for the last line, it also occurs with other lines, except line 1, as shown in
In
The first aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method which comprises applying waveform to pixels wherein said waveform comprises a plurality of driving frames and the driving frames have varying frame times.
In one embodiment, the driving frames at the transition time points of the waveform have a first frame time and the remaining driving frames have a second frame time. The term “transition time point” is intended to refer to the time point at which a different voltage is applied. For example, at a transition time point, the voltage applied may raise from 0V to +V or from −V to +V or may decrease from +V to 0V or from +V to −V, etc.
In one embodiment, the first frame time is a fraction of the second frame time. For example, the first frame time may be from about 5% to about 80% of the second frame time, preferably from about 5% to about 60%, of the second frame time.
In the frames with the shortened frame time, each line driving time is also shortened to 16.67 μsec. As the result, the lag time for each line (other than line 1) is also shortened. The updating of the last line in the driving frames of the shortened frame time lags behind the updating of the common electrode is only about 10 msec, as shown in
By comparing
In addition, there are no additional data points required as the number of the driving frames remains the same, which leads to the same number of charging of the TFT capacitor. Therefore the power consumption is nearly identical with the waveform having driving frames of a fixed frame time.
This driving method can be designed and incorporated into a timing controller (i.e., a display controller) which generates and provides driving frames of varying frame times to the source and gate driver IC in an active matrix driving scheme.
The second aspect of the invention is directed to driving waveform comprising a plurality of driving frames wherein said driving frames have varying frame times.
In one embodiment, the driving frames at the transition time points of the waveform have a first frame time and the remaining driving frames have a second frame time.
In a further embodiment, the first frame time is a fraction of the second from time. For example, the first frame time may be from about 5% to about 80% of the second frame time, preferably from about 5% to about 60%, of the second frame time.
Although the driving method and waveform of the present invention are especially beneficial to the mono-polar driving approach, the bi-polar driving approach can also take advantage of the method to shorten the overall driving time, as shown in
Although the foregoing disclosure has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in that art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the method and system of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive, and the inventive features are not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/295,628, filed Jan. 15, 2010; the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4143947 | Aftergut et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4259694 | Liao | Mar 1981 | A |
4443108 | Webster | Apr 1984 | A |
4568975 | Harshbarger et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4575124 | Morrison et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
5266937 | DiSanto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5298993 | Edgar et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5754584 | Durrant et al. | May 1998 | A |
5831697 | Evanicky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5923315 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926617 | Ohara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6005890 | Clow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6045756 | Carr et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069971 | Kanno et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075506 | Bonnett et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111248 | Melendez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6154309 | Otani et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504524 | Gates et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6531997 | Gates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532008 | Guranlnick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6639580 | Kishi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657612 | Machida et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671081 | Kawai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674561 | Ohnishi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686953 | Holmes | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6796698 | Sommers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6903716 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914713 | Chung et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927755 | Chang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6970155 | Cabrera | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995550 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7177066 | Chung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184196 | Ukigaya | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242514 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277074 | Shih | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283119 | Kishi | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307779 | Cernasov et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7349146 | Douglass et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7504050 | Weng et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7528822 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7705823 | Nihei et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7710376 | Edo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733311 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7773069 | Miyasaka et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800580 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7804483 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7816440 | Matsui | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7839381 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7952558 | Yang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7999787 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009348 | Zehner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8035611 | Sakamoto | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8054253 | Yoo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8102363 | Hirayama | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8125501 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8179387 | Shin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8243013 | Sprague et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8334836 | Kanamori et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8405600 | Reis et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020021483 | Katase | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033792 | Inoue | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030095090 | Ham | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137521 | Zehner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193565 | Wen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040246562 | Chung et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263450 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001812 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050162377 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179642 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185003 | Dedene et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210405 | Ernst et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219184 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060023126 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050361 | Johnson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060119567 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132426 | Johnson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139305 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139309 | Miyasaka | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164405 | Zhou | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187186 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060232547 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262147 | Kimpe et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070035510 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046621 | Suwabe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046625 | Yee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070052668 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070032 | Chung et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080926 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080928 | Ishii et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091117 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103427 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109274 | Reynolds | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132687 | Johnson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146306 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159682 | Takanak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176889 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182402 | Kojima | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188439 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247417 | Miyazaki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262949 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276615 | Cao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296690 | Nagasaki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080150886 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158142 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211833 | Inoue | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080266243 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273022 | Komatsu | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303780 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090096745 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090267970 | Wong et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100134538 | Sprague et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149169 | Miyasaka | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194733 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194789 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238203 | Stroemer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283804 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295880 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110096104 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110175945 | Lin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216104 | Chan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110298776 | Lin | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120120122 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1813279 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1849639 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101009083 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101236727 | Aug 2008 | CN |
200214654 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2009-1927896 | Aug 2009 | JP |
10-2008-0055331 | Jun 2008 | KR |
200506783 | Feb 2005 | TW |
200625223 | Jul 2006 | TW |
WO 2005004099 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005031688 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034076 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2009049204 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2010132272 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,197, filed Mar. 11, 2008, Wang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,513, filed May 5, 2008, Sprague et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/909,752, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Sprague et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,711, filed Jan. 19, 2011, Lin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/311,693, filed Mar. 8, 2010, Chan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/351,764, filed Jun. 4, 2010, Lin. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/412,746, filed Nov. 11, 2010, Lin, et al. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., Chu, MI., and Su, CY. (Feb. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 15-19. |
Kao, WC., (Feb. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Dispaly. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 1-5. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., and Lin, C. (Jan. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 11.2-2. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., Lin, FS., Lin, C., and Sprague, R. (Jan. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Display with 16 Gray Levels. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 10.2-2. |
Kao, WC., Fang, CY., Chen, YY., Shen, MH., and Wong, J. (Jan. 2008) Integrating Flexible Electrophoretic Display and One-Time Password Generator in Smart Cards. ICCE 2008 Digest of Technical Papers, p. 4-3. (Int'l Conference on Consumer Electronics, Jan. 9-13, 2008). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/004,763, filed Jan. 11, 2011, Lin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/471,004, filed May 14, 2012, Sprague et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/597,089, filed Aug. 28, 2012, Sprague et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110175875 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61295628 | Jan 2010 | US |