This invention relates to ejecting drops.
Ink jet printers are one type of apparatus for depositing drops on a substrate. Ink jet printers typically include an ink path from an ink supply to a nozzle path. The nozzle path terminates in a nozzle opening from which ink drops are ejected. Ink drop ejection is typically controlled by pressurizing ink in the ink path with an actuator, which may be, for example, a piezoelectric deflector, a thermal bubble jet generator, or an electrostatically deflected element. A typical print assembly has an array of ink paths with corresponding nozzle openings and associated actuators. Drop ejection from each nozzle opening can be independently controlled. In a drop-on-demand print assembly, each actuator is fired to selectively eject a drop at a specific pixel location of an image as the print assembly and a printing substrate are moved relative to one another. In high performance print assemblies, the nozzle openings typically have a diameter of 50 microns or less, e.g. around 25 microns, are separated at a pitch of 100-300 nozzles/inch, have a resolution of 100 to 3000 dpi or more, and provide drops with a volume of about 1 to 120 picoliters (pL) or less. Drop ejection frequency is typically 10 kHz or more.
Hoisington et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,265,315, describes a print assembly that has a semiconductor body and a piezoelectric actuator. The body is made of silicon, which is etched to define ink chambers. Nozzle openings are defined by a separate nozzle plate, which is attached to the silicon body. The piezoelectric actuator has a layer of piezoelectric material, which changes geometry, or bends, in response to an applied voltage. The bending of the piezoelectric layer pressurizes ink in a pumping chamber located along the ink path. Piezoelectric ink jet print assemblies are also described in Fishbeck et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,227, Hine U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,598, Moynihan et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,346 and Hoisington U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,391, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In an aspect, the invention features a drop ejector that includes a flow path in which fluid is pressurized to eject drops from a nozzle opening formed in a substantially planar substrate. Also formed in the substrate proximate the nozzle opening is a channel. The channel is spaced from the nozzle opening by a distance of about 20% of a nozzle width or more.
In another aspect, the invention features a method of fluid ejection that includes providing a drop ejector that includes a flow path in which fluid is pressurized for ejection through a nozzle opening formed in a substrate. Also formed in the substrate proximate the nozzle opening is a channel. The channel is spaced from the nozzle opening by a distance of about 20% of a nozzle width or more. The method also includes providing a fluid that is wicked by capillary forces into the space defined by the channel and ejecting the fluid through the nozzle opening by pressurizing the fluid in the flow path.
Other aspects or embodiments may include combinations of the features in the aspects above and/or one or more of the following. The nozzle opening is surrounded by the channel. The channel is in the shape of a circle. The channel extends radially from the nozzle opening. The channel has a width that is about twice the nozzle opening width or less. The channel has a width of about 100 microns or less. The channel is from about 2 microns to about 50 microns. The substrate is a silicon material. The planar substrate includes a plurality of nozzle openings and channels proximate the nozzle openings. The nozzle opening width is about 200 microns or less. The drop ejector includes a piezoelectric actuator. The fluid has a surface tension of about 20-50 dynes/cm. The fluid has a viscosity of about 1 to 40 centipoise.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following advantages. Printhead operation is robust and reliable since waste ink about the face of the nozzle plate is controlled to reduce interference with drop formation and ejection. Drop velocity and trajectory straightness is maintained in high performance printheads in which large arrays of small nozzles must accurately eject ink to precise locations on a substrate. The channels control waste ink and permit desirable jetting characteristics with a variety of jetting fluids, such as inks with varying viscosity or surface tension characteristics, and heads with varying pressure characteristics at the nozzle openings. The channels are robust, do not require moving components, and can be economically implemented by machining, e.g. laser machining, or etching, e.g., in a semiconductor material such as a silicon material.
Still further aspects, features, and advantages follow. For example, particular aspects include channel dimensions, characteristics and operating conditions described below.
Referring to
The inkjet apparatus also controls the operating pressure at the ink meniscus proximate the nozzle openings when the system is not ejecting drops. Variations in meniscus pressure can cause variation in drop volume or velocity which can lead to printing errors and weeping. In the embodiment illustrated, pressure control is provided by a vacuum source 30 such as a mechanical pump that applies a vacuum to the headspace 9 over the ink 12 in the reservoir 11. The vacuum is communicated through the ink to the nozzle opening 17 to prevent ink from weeping through the nozzle opening by force of gravity. A controller 32, e.g. a computer controller, monitors the vacuum over the ink in the reservoir 11 and adjusts the source 30 to maintain a desired vacuum in the reservoir. In other embodiments, a vacuum source is provided by arranging the ink reservoir below the nozzle openings to create a vacuum proximate the nozzle openings. An ink level monitor (not shown) detects the level of ink, which falls as ink is consumed during a printing operation and thus increases the vacuum at the nozzles. A controller monitors the ink level and refills the reservoir from a bulk container when ink falls below a desired level to maintain vacuum within a desired operation range. In other embodiments, in which the reservoir is located far enough below the nozzles that the vacuum of the meniscus overcomes the capillary force in the nozzle, the ink can be pressurized to maintain a meniscus proximate the nozzle openings. In embodiments, the vacuum is maintained at about 0.5 to about 10 inches of water.
Referring to
Referring particularly to
The spacing, size and orientation of the channels are selected to control waste ink. In embodiments, the spacing, S, from an edge of the channel to an edge of the nozzle opening is between about 20% of a nozzle width, WN, or more, e.g., 30% or more, and about five times the nozzle width or less, e.g., three times the nozzle width or less. The width, WC, and depth, D, of the channel is selected to prevent excessive pooling of ink on the nozzle surface and to allow fluid to be drawn into the space defined by the channel and retained by capillary forces. In embodiments, the channel width is between about twice the nozzle width or less and about 10% of the nozzle width or more. In particular embodiments, the channel width, WC, is, e.g., about 100 microns or less, e.g., 5-20 microns, and the channel depth, D, is, e.g., about 2-10 microns or more, e.g., 50 microns. In embodiments, the nozzle width WN is, e.g., about 200 microns or less, e.g., 25-100 microns and the spacing S from the nozzle opening to the edge of the channel is, e.g., 40 microns or greater, e.g., 100 microns. In embodiments, the nozzle pitch is about 25 nozzles/inch or more, e.g., about 300 nozzles/inch, the ink drop volume is about 1 to 70 pL and the fluid is pressurized by a piezoelectric actuator. In embodiments, the jetting fluid has a viscosity of about 1 to 40 centipoise and a surface tension of about 20-50 dynes/cm. In embodiments, the jetting fluid is ink. In embodiments, the channels can include a wicking material and/or a nonwetting coating (e.g., TEFLONĀ® fluoropolymer) can be applied to the nozzle plate surface between the nozzle and the channel. The channel network can also be in communication with a vacuum source (not shown). Waste ink can be returned to the main ink supply or to a separate suction system. In embodiments, the orientation of the channel is circular. In other embodiments, the orientation of the channel is sinuous.
The channels and/or the nozzle opening in any of the above described embodiments can be formed by machining, electroforming, laser ablation, and chemical or plasma etching. The channels can also be formed by molding, e.g., injection molded plastic channels. In embodiments, the channel, nozzle opening, and pressure chamber are formed in a common body. The body can be a metal, carbon or an etchable material such as silicon material, e.g., silicon or silicon dioxide. Forming printhead components using etching techniques is further described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/189,947, filed Jul. 3, 2002, and U.S. Ser. No. 60/510,459, filed Oct. 10, 2003, the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference.
The channels can be used in combination with other waste fluid control features such as apertures described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/749,829, filed Dec. 30, 2003, wells as described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/749,622, filed Dec. 30, 2003 and/or projections as described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/749,816, filed Dec. 30, 2003. For example, a series of projections can be included on the nozzle face proximate the channels.
In embodiments, the drop ejection system can be utilized to eject fluids other than ink. For example, the deposited droplets may be a UV or other radiation curable material or other material, for example, chemical or biological fluids, capable of being delivered as drops. For example, the apparatus described could be part of a precision dispensing system. The actuator can be an electromechanical or thermal actuator. The cleaning structures can be combined with a manual or automatic washing and wiping system in which a cleaning fluid is applied to the nozzle plate and wiped clean. The cleaning structures can collect cleaning fluid and debris rather than jetted waste ink.
Still other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3747120 | Stemme | Jul 1973 | A |
4413268 | Bentin | Nov 1983 | A |
4422082 | Louzil | Dec 1983 | A |
4613875 | Le et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
5853861 | Held | Dec 1998 | A |
5898444 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6041600 | Silverbrook | Mar 2000 | A |
6132028 | Su et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6235212 | Silverbrook | May 2001 | B1 |
6258286 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264307 | Silverbrook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6439695 | Silverbrook | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6520617 | Blair | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536874 | Silverbrook | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6582059 | Silverbrook | Jun 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2-4515 | Jan 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050140747 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |