Reference is made to commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/417,569, entitled “DROP FORMATION WITH REDUCED STIMULATION CROSSTALK”, filed concurrently herewith.
This invention relates generally to the field of digitally controlled printing devices, and in particular to continuous printing systems in which a liquid stream breaks into drops that are deflected by a gas flow.
In thermally stimulated continuous inkjet printing, see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,588,888 B2, issued to Jeanmaire et al., on Jul. 8, 2003; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,821, issued to Chwalek et al., on Jun. 27, 2000, periodic heat pulses are applied to individual heaters embedded in a nozzle array. The periodic heat pulses drive capillary break-up of jets formed at each nozzle to produce an array of drops. The period of the pulse waveform determines the ultimate size of drop formed after jet break-up. Because the jet responds most sensitively to disturbances at a characteristic frequency fR known as the Rayleigh frequency, drops are most effectively produced at a fundamental size corresponding to a volume of fluid given by πr2U/fR, where r is the jet radius and U is the jet velocity.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,796 B2, issued to Jeanmaire et al., on Feb. 8, 2005, describes a printing system that relies on the ability to generate distinct sizes of drop—a “print drop” of a given size, and a “catch drop” of distinctly different size. Differential deflection of the drops of different sizes is employed to cause print drops to impinge on the substrate and the catch drops to be collected and recirculated through the ink delivery system. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,796 B2, an ink drop forming mechanism selectively creates a stream of ink drops having a plurality of different volumes traveling along a first path. A gas flow directed across the stream of ink drops interacts with the stream of ink drops. This interaction deflects smaller drops more than larger drops and thereby separates ink drops having one volume from ink drops having other volumes.
As the drop selection mechanism described above depends on drop size, it is necessary for large-volume drops to be fully formed before being exposed to the deflection air flow. Consider, for example, a case where the large-volume drop is to have a volume equal to four small-volume drops. It is often seen during drop formation that the portion of the ink stream that is to form the large-volume drop will separate from the main stream as desired, but will then break apart before coalescing to form the large-volume drop. It is necessary for this coalescence to be complete prior to passing through the drop deflecting air flow. Otherwise the separate fragments that are to form the large-volume drop will be deflected by an amount greater than that of a single large-volume drop. Similarly, the small-volume drops must not merge in air before having past the deflection air flow. If separate small-volume drops merge, they will be deflected less than desired.
The distance over which the large volume drop forms upon coalescence of its fragments is known as the drop formation length (DFL), denoted herein as LD. The details of the large drop waveform and the physical properties of the jet determine the size of LD. For the purposes of printing, smaller drop formation lengths are advantageous, as the drops are then available for size separation at distances closer to the nozzle plate, and the distance over which the drops must travel prior to separation is reduced. Thus a smaller drop formation length helps reduce the size of the print head and reduces the risk of incomplete large drop formation and reduces the risk of unintended merging of small drops.
It has been found that the small-volume drops between coalesced large-volume drops can be very unevenly spaced. In extreme circumstances, the large-volume drop often remains only partially formed until the large-volume drop is well beyond the deflection air flow. The partially formed large-volume drop and the small-volume drop immediately in front of it must merge to produce the completed large-volume drop. Occasionally, an undesirable merging of a small-volume drop and a large-volume drop will occur at some distance from the orifices. It is desirable to have the merging drops coalesce as quickly as possible after break off without additional merging of the small-volume drops with large-volume drops or with adjacent small-volume drops.
Continuous drop emission systems that utilize stimulation per jet apparatus are effective in providing control of the break-up parameters of an individual jet within a large array of jets. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,395 B2, issued to Xu et al., on Aug. 17, 2010, however, even when the stimulation is highly localized to each jet, for example, via resistive heating at the nozzle exit of each jet, some stimulation crosstalk still propagates as acoustic energy through the liquid via the common supply chambers. The added acoustic stimulation crosstalk from adjacent jets may adversely affect jet break up in terms of break-off timing or satellite drop formation. When operating in a printing mode of generating different predetermined drop volumes, according to the liquid pattern data, acoustic stimulation crosstalk may alter the jet break-up producing drops that are not the desired predetermined volume. Especially in the case of systems using multiple predetermined drop volumes, the effects of acoustic stimulation crosstalk are data-dependent, leading to complex interactions that are difficult to predict.
Stimulation crosstalk can manifest itself in a pattern along an entire nozzle array, suggestive of acoustic modes in portions of the printhead behind the nozzle array. In addition to the long-range effects including, for example, over hundreds to thousands of nozzles and macroscopic distances, there are short-range effects in which stimulation of a given jet affects neighboring jets. Of particular importance is the effect of producing a large drop in one jet while making small drops in neighboring jets. The disturbance resulting from the large drop waveform can impart differential velocity to small drops in a neighboring jet, thereby causing unintended merging of small drops. The degree of disturbance in neighboring jets caused by a large-drop waveform is sensitive to the details of the large-drop waveform. Large-drop waveforms wherein the heat pulses minimally disturb the neighboring jets concurrently operating during printing are advantageous, as high-quality prints are more readily achieved with simple and robust data processing algorithms requiring less compensation for particular patterns of drop formation in neighboring jets.
Thus, there is a need for waveforms for making large drops that provides a short drop formation length with reduced disturbance of neighboring jets.
According to an aspect of the invention, a method of operating a jetting module includes providing a jetting module including a nozzle and a drop forming mechanism. Liquid is provided to the jetting module under pressure sufficient to cause a liquid stream to jet from the nozzle. A small drop waveform is provided that causes the liquid stream to break up into a small volume drop. The small drop waveform includes a pulse having a pulse energy ES, and a period XS, where XS≈1/fR, and where fR is the Rayleigh frequency of the liquid. A large drop waveform is provided that causes the liquid stream to break up to form a large volume drop. The large drop waveform having a period XL, where XL=NXS, with the large volume drop being N times the volume of the small volume drop. The large drop waveform includes a first pulse having a pulse energy EL1, where EL1≧ES. The large drop waveform includes a second pulse occurring within a time period X2, where X2≦XS, of an initial pulse of a subsequent small drop waveform or a subsequent large drop waveform. The second pulse including a pulse energy EL2, where EL2<ES. The drop forming mechanism is activated using a sequence including a combination of at least one small drop waveform and at least one large drop waveform.
In the detailed description of the example embodiments of the invention presented below, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present description will be directed in particular to elements forming part of, or cooperating more directly with, apparatus in accordance with the present invention. It is to be understood that elements not specifically shown or described may take various forms well known to those skilled in the art. In the following description and drawings, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements.
The example embodiments of the present invention are illustrated schematically and not to scale for the sake of clarity. One of the ordinary skills in the art will be able to readily determine the specific size and interconnections of the elements of the example embodiments of the present invention.
As described herein, the example embodiments of the present invention provide a printhead or printhead components typically used in inkjet printing systems. However, many other applications are emerging which use inkjet printheads to emit liquids (other than inks) that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision. As such, as described herein, the terms “liquid” and “ink” refer to any material that can be ejected by the printhead or printhead components described below.
Referring to
Referring to
Recording medium 32 is moved relative to printhead 30 by a recording medium transport system 34, which is electronically controlled by a recording medium transport control system 36, and which in turn is controlled by a micro-controller 38. The recording medium transport system shown in
Ink is contained in an ink reservoir 40 under pressure. In the non-printing state, continuous ink jet drop streams are unable to reach recording medium 32 due to an ink catcher 42 that blocks the stream and which may allow a portion of the ink to be recycled by an ink recycling unit 44. The ink recycling unit reconditions the ink and feeds it back to reservoir 40. Such ink recycling units are well known in the art. The ink pressure suitable for optimal operation will depend on a number of factors, including geometry and thermal properties of the nozzles and thermal properties of the ink. A constant ink pressure can be achieved by applying pressure to ink reservoir 40 under the control of ink pressure regulator 46. Alternatively, the ink reservoir can be left unpressurized, or even under a reduced pressure (vacuum), and a pump is employed to deliver ink from the ink reservoir under pressure to the printhead 30. In such an embodiment, the ink pressure regulator 46 can comprise an ink pump control system. As shown in
The ink is distributed to printhead 30 through an ink channel 47. The ink preferably flows through slots or holes etched through a silicon substrate of printhead 30 to its front surface, where a plurality of nozzles and drop forming mechanisms, for example, heaters, are situated. When printhead 30 is fabricated from silicon, drop forming mechanism control circuits 26 can be integrated with the printhead. Printhead 30 also includes a deflection mechanism (not shown in
Referring to
Liquid, for example, ink, is emitted under pressure through each nozzle 50 of the array to form filaments of liquid 52. In
Jetting module 48 is operable to form liquid drops having a first size or volume and liquid drops having a second size or volume through each nozzle. To accomplish this, jetting module 48 includes a drop stimulation device 28, also commonly called a drop forming device, for example, a heater or a piezoelectric actuator, that, when selectively activated, perturbs each filament of liquid 52, for example, ink, to induce portions of each filament to breakoff from the filament and coalesce to form drops 54, 56.
In
Typically, one drop forming device 28 is associated with each nozzle 50 of the nozzle array. However, a drop forming device 28 can be associated with groups of nozzles 50 or all of nozzles 50 of the nozzle array.
When printhead 30 is in operation, drops 54, 56 are typically created in a plurality of sizes or volumes, for example, in the form of large drops 56, a first size or volume, and small drops 54, a second size or volume. The ratio of the mass of the large drops 56 to the mass of the small drops 54 is typically approximately an integer between 2 and 10. A drop stream 58 including drops 54, 56 follows a drop path or trajectory 57.
Printhead 30 also includes a gas flow deflection mechanism 60 that directs a flow of gas 62, for example, air, past a portion of the drop trajectory 57. This portion of the drop trajectory is called the deflection zone 64. As the flow of gas 62 interacts with drops 54, 56 in deflection zone 64 it alters the drop trajectories. As the drop trajectories pass out of the deflection zone 64 they are traveling at an angle, called a deflection angle, relative to the undeflected drop trajectory 57.
Small drops 54 are more affected by the flow of gas than are large drops 56 so that the small drop trajectory 66 diverges from the large drop trajectory 68. That is, the deflection angle for small drops 54 is larger than for large drops 56. The flow of gas 62 provides sufficient drop deflection and therefore sufficient divergence of the small and large drop trajectories so that catcher 42 (shown in
When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept large drop trajectory 68, small drops 54 are deflected sufficiently to avoid contact with catcher 42 and strike the print media. As the small drops are printed, this is called small drop print mode. When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept small drop trajectory 66, large drops 56 are the drops that print. This is referred to as large drop print mode.
Referring to
Drop stimulation or drop forming device 28 (shown in
Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a first side of drop trajectory 57. Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 includes first gas flow duct 72 that includes a lower wall 74 and an upper wall 76. Gas flow duct 72 directs gas flow 62 supplied from a positive pressure source 92 at downward angle θ of approximately a 45° relative to liquid filament 52 toward drop deflection zone 64 (also shown in
Upper wall 76 of gas flow duct 72 does not need to extend to drop deflection zone 64 (as shown in
Negative pressure gas flow structure 63 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a second side of drop trajectory 57. Negative pressure gas flow structure includes a second gas flow duct 78 located between catcher 42 and an upper wall 82 that exhausts gas flow from deflection zone 64. Second duct 78 is connected to a negative pressure source 94 that is used to help remove gas flowing through second duct 78. An optional seal(s) 84 provides an air seal between jetting module 48 and upper wall 82.
As shown in
Gas supplied by first gas flow duct 72 is directed into the drop deflection zone 64, where it causes large drops 56 to follow large drop trajectory 68 and small drops 54 to follow small drop trajectory 66. As shown in
Alternatively, deflection can be accomplished by applying heat asymmetrically to filament of liquid 52 using an asymmetric heater 51. When used in this capacity, asymmetric heater 51 typically operates as the drop forming mechanism in addition to the deflection mechanism. This type of drop formation and deflection is known having been described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,821, issued to Chwalek et al., on Jun. 27, 2000.
Deflection can also be accomplished using an electrostatic deflection mechanism. Typically, the electrostatic deflection mechanism either incorporates drop charging and drop deflection in a single electrode, like the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,808, or includes separate drop charging and drop deflection electrodes.
As shown in
By way of background, ink supplied to the drop generator passes through the nozzles of the orifice plate, forming a cylindrical filament or jet of fluid having a diameter, D, which is approximately the diameter of the nozzle. This jet of fluid moves at a velocity Vj. When the pulses are applied to the stimulation device, for example, a heater surrounding a nozzle, a perturbation is created in the diameter of the jet at the nozzle. This perturbation moves with the fluid. The perturbation therefore moves at the velocity, VJ. If another pulse is applied to the stimulation device, another perturbation is created in the diameter of the jet at the nozzle that also moves with the jet at VJ. It is well known that if the spacing of the perturbations on the jet is greater than Rayleigh limit λC, which is approximately π*D, the amplitude of the perturbation can grow (see generally, Lord Rayleigh, “On the Instability of Jets,” Proc. London Math. Soc. X (1878)). As the perturbation grows, eventually it will grow to the point that it will cause a drop to separate from the jet. On the other hand, if the spacing is less than the Rayleigh limit λC, the amplitude of the perturbation will shrink, and it will not cause a drop to break off from the jet. Lord Rayleigh's studies also showed that there is a spacing between perturbations λR at which the perturbation amplitude grows most rapidly. For many common fluids to be jetted from a nozzle, λR is approximately 4.5*D. The existence of a cutoff spacing between perturbations λC implies that there is cutoff time period λC between consecutive pulses to the drop formation device 28 below which the perturbations produced on the liquid jet by the drop formation device will shrink, and above which the perturbations will grow. Equivalently there is a cutoff frequency fC above which perturbations produced on the liquid jet by the drop formation device will shrink, and below which the perturbations will grow. For fluids at low Weber number, where the simple Rayleigh theory applies, fC=Vj/(2πR), where Vj is the jet velocity and R is the jet radius. Furthermore, the existence of a perturbation spacing λR at which the perturbations grow most rapidly indicates that there is a perturbation period XR and a corresponding perturbation frequency fR, referred to herein as the Rayleigh period and Rayleigh frequency respectively, at which the resulting perturbations grow most rapidly. The growth rate for perturbations falls off fairly quickly at perturbations periods less than the Rayleigh period, falling off most rapidly just above the cutoff period. The steep slope of the perturbation growth rate curve just above the cutoff period causes the stimulation to be very sensitive to small changes in hole size, jet velocity, or ink properties in this region. As the perturbation growth rate curve is maximized at the Rayleigh period, the slope of the perturbation growth rate curve near the Rayleigh period is near zero causing the stimulation to be very insensitive to small changes in hole size, jet velocity, or ink properties near this perturbation period.
A sequence of three small drop waveforms 102 is shown in
In the present invention, various pulses are described for the creation of the large and small drops. It is recognized that these individual pulses for the creation of the drops can be formed as a burst of pulses generated at a much higher frequency, referred to here as a carrier frequency. When a single burst of pulses is supplied to the drop forming device 28 at a carrier frequency rate that exceeds the response rate of the drop forming device 28 (thermal response rate when the drop forming device is a heater or mechanical actuation response rate when it is a piezoelectric actuator or some other displacement actuator), then the drop forming device acts on the liquid jet as though the single burst of pulses were a single pulse, whose width is equal to the total width of the burst of pulses and whose power level is equal to the average power supplied by the burst of pulses,
Referring to
An embodiment of a large drop waveform 120 according to the invention is shown in
By experiment it is found that the first and second pulses 122 and 124 in the large-drop waveform of
Furthermore, it is found by experiment that the large-drop waveform of
Finally, it is found by experiment that the large-drop waveform of
Each drop forming transducer acts on the nozzle, the liquid passing through the nozzle, or the liquid jet flowing from the nozzle to introduce a perturbation to the liquid jet such that the perturbation can grow to cause a drop to break off from the liquid jet. The drop forming transducers are each substantially symmetric about the nozzle 50 so that as to act on the liquid passing through the nozzle and not substantially alter the directionality of the liquid jet. In response to the print data, the mechanism control circuit 26 creates the drop formation waveforms and supplies them to the drop forming transducers. In the embodiment shown, the energy pulses of the small drop waveforms and the first pulse 122 of the large drop waveform are supplied to the first drop forming transducer 41. The second pulse 124 of the large drop waveform 106 is supplied to the second drop forming transducer 42. In other embodiments, different distribution mixes of energy pulses can be supplied to the first and second drop forming transducers, such as energizing both the first and second drop forming transducers with one or both of the first and second pulses of the long drop formation waveform, while directing the energy pulses of the small drop waveform only to the first drop formation transducer.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4636808 | Herron | Jan 1987 | A |
6079821 | Chwalek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6450628 | Jeanmaire et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457807 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491362 | Jeanmaire | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505921 | Chwalek et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6554410 | Jeanmaire et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575566 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588888 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6793328 | Jeanmaire | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827429 | Jeanmaire et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851796 | Jeanmaire et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7777395 | Xu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8091991 | Hanchak et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020085071 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20110109677 | Montz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Lord Rayleigh, “On the Instability of Jets,” Proc. London Math. Soc. X (1878). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130235101 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |