Formwork is a type of construction material used in the construction of buildings and other types of architecture projects that typically include concrete sections (e.g., walls, floors). Formwork is provided in a modular set of components to provide support structure during construction and may be temporary or permanent. Temporary formwork is the focus of this disclosure and differs from permanent formwork at least because temporary formwork is used during the construction process and does not become part of the completed structure (i.e., permanent). Formwork is generally used to assist in creating a “form” into which concrete may be poured and then allowed to “set” into hardened concrete. One typical use for temporary formwork is to support different layers of a building while concrete floors are poured for each layer (e.g., floor of the building or structure).
In one example, formwork may be used to create a grid system to support a roof or ceiling of an already finished floor while the next higher floor is poured. The grid system includes support props (sometimes called “posts” or “shores”) that hold main beams. The main beams, in turn are spanned by joists (e.g., perpendicular to the main beams). The joists support a decking material (usually plywood) onto which cement may be poured and allowed to set. In this manner, a building may be constructed from the ground up, one floor at a time. As each layer is built, temporary formwork from a previous layer may be removed (after the cement has sufficiently cured) and relocated to a higher floor to repeat the process of building each layer for subsequent floors of the structure.
At the top of each prop is a drophead nut that when engaged (i.e., expanded) holds the main beam at a desired height. Upon disengagement of the supporting mid-plate (i.e., compression), the drophead nut releases and allows removal of associated main beams and the joists. This disclosure presents multiple aspects of an improved drophead nut that remains interoperable with existing formwork grid systems.
The present disclosure may be better understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying Figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions or locations of functional attributes may be relocated or combined based on design, structural requirements, building codes, or other factors known in the art of construction. Further, example usage of components may not represent an exhaustive list of how those components may be used alone, or with respect to each other. That is, some components may provide capabilities not specifically described in the examples of this disclosure but would be apparent and known to those of ordinary skill in the art, given the benefit of this disclosure. For a detailed description of various examples, reference be made below to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Illustrative examples of the subject matter claimed below will now be disclosed. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described for every example implementation in this specification. It will be appreciated that in the development of any such actual example, numerous implementation-specific decisions may be made to achieve the designers' specific goals, such as compliance with architectural and building code constraints, which will vary from one usage to another.
Disclosed herein is a drophead nut for use with formwork building components. The disclosed drophead nut maintains standard outward dimensions to allow interoperability with existing systems (i.e., other existing formwork components). The impact surface of the drophead nut is typically used to align a gap in the nut with a retention pin and thus allow the nut to drop. This, in turn, allows a mid-plate of the drophead nut to fall and release components supported therefrom. In most cases, these components will include main beams and/or joists (secondary beams). In its extended position, the drophead connects to a post at a desired height to support a set of main beams and joists that in turn support a decking to receive wet cement or concrete.
Once the cement or concrete is cured, the drophead nut may be disengaged (i.e., released) to allow removal of support structures and allow stripping the decking from below. The impact surface of the disclosed drophead nut has been enlarged, reinforced, and possibly repositioned to increase leverage. The resulting drophead nut may allow for reduction in number of impacts on an impact surface to provide alignment of a gap and retention pin, and thus activate the compression of the drophead nut. In some embodiments, the retention pin of the disclosed drophead nut has also been substantially strengthened. A strengthened retention pin allows a mid-plate to support more weight while the drophead nut is in its engaged position.
The above referenced additional capacity of the drophead nut may work in conjunction with improved main beams and secondary beams to create grid systems that have larger grids than traditional systems. For example, grid systems may be increased from their traditional six foot by six foot size and be increased to six foot by eight foot, eight foot by eight foot, or even larger grid sizes. As explained in more detail below, each increase in grid size typically allows for a reduction in total number of components utilized to create a formwork grid system for an area of construction (e.g., square footage of concrete pour). Specific test measurements for different example implementations are provided as an appendix to this Specification.
In general, formwork may be used to support portions of a building itself while the building is being constructed. Formwork may include multiple components that are modular. Each of the components provides specific capabilities and when used together with other formwork components may provide appropriate support characteristics as required for the building's construction parameters (e.g., thickness of slab, placement of permanent support columns). Formwork differs from scaffolding (another type of componentized construction material) in several ways. In particular, scaffolding is designed to provide safety and support for workers, equipment, and combinations thereof during a construction project. In contrast, formwork provides appropriate support characteristics for portions of the structure being built.
Accordingly, the design specifications, requirements, and other characteristics of scaffolding differ greatly from those of formwork. For example, formwork will support orders of magnitude more weight than scaffolding and scaffolding may be designed to wrap the external facade of a building rather than be internal to the building. There are also other differences between scaffolding and formwork that are known to those in the art.
Grid systems generally refers to the set of components of formwork used to create a grid to support decking material such that concrete may be poured to form the floor immediately above the working area of the grid system. For example, a grid system on the ground floor (e.g., foundation) of a building would be installed on that ground floor to support pouring of concrete to create the floor of the second story of the building (or possibly the roof of a one-story building). Once the floor of the second story has cured, the grid system may be disassembled and relocated to the newly built floor to support pouring of the third story. This process may be repeated as many times as there are floors (i.e., stories) of the building.
Grid systems include, among other components, shores, or posts, to provide vertical support, main beams to provide lateral support across the shores, and joists that span across main beams to provide support for a decking material. In formwork terminology, joists may be referred to as “secondary beams,” “secondary joists,” or some other term to distinguish them as the spanning support (above the main beams) for the sheathing or decking material. This disclosure provides information regarding an improved drophead nut to make installation and removal of formwork components more efficient.
Referring now to
In the midpoint of drophead nut 100, several components are shown that are either attached to or allowed to freely rotate about post 130. Upper post key 131 is a protrusion from upper post portion 130A that fits into a slot on mid-plate 110 (an example slot is shown in
Concurrently referencing
As illustrated in
Returning to
Referring now to
In the illustration of
As noted above, and discussed further below, the disclosed improved drophead nut has a retention pin capable of supporting significantly more weight than prior art systems. This additional support weight may, in turn, cause rotation of the rotational nut to require more force to be repositioned and disengaged. Accordingly, improvements to the impact surface work together with improvements to increase weight capacity of a drophead nut while maintaining a similar and interoperable functionality with existing formwork components. Similarly, improvements to drophead nut components may work together with improvements to joists and main beams as disclosed in the above referenced concurrently filed patent applications.
As will be explained in more detail below, disclosed embodiments of an improved drophead nut have several advantages over their prior art counterparts while maintaining a consistent external form factor to allow interchangeable use of the improved components. Prior art drophead nuts have a retention pin 125 that is 13 millimeters in diameter and a retention pin gap in the corresponding rotational nut 120 is 14 millimeters. In contrast, drophead nuts according to one disclosed embodiment have a retention pin 175 that is 18 millimeters in diameter and a retention pin gap in the corresponding rotational nut 170 is 19 millimeters. The prior art drophead nuts are designed to support six feet by six feet grid segments and have an ultimate shear strength at the retention pin of about 19 thousand pounds. In contrast, drophead nuts according to disclosed embodiments are designed to have much greater ultimate shear strengths in excess of 20 thousand pounds. In one example, ultimate shear strength may be over 49,134 pounds. As a result, improved drophead nuts, designed in accordance with this disclosure, may support grid segments that are at least eight feet by eight feet (or eight by six feet as another example). Larger grids allow for reduction of number of components of formwork grid systems to create a same sized pouring surface (e.g., slab area). Accordingly, a reduction in construction, shipping, storage, and overall simplification results in an increased productivity (efficiency) for the overall system. In some cases, the under side of a retention pin may be welded to a corresponding post to increase ultimate shear strength. Improved strength not only allows for a larger grid segment but may also allow for pouring a greater slab thickness on top of the decking material.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
Concurrently referencing
Referring now to
With reference to
View 400A also shows mid-plate key gap 454, mid-plate lip 451, post 480, and mid-plate retention pin gap 453, which were discussed above. The arm total extent 402 is illustrated as being 2.56 inches and represents the distance in radius from a center of rotational nut 440 (i.e., a point in the center of post 480 when fully configured). Each of retention pin gap 446 and mid-plate retention pin gap 453 are illustrated to be at least 0.71 inches and substantially the same size as each other. In general, as explained above, each respective retention pin gap (i.e., mid-plate retention pin gap 453 and retention pin gap 446 of rotational nut 440) is sized to allow, upon alignment, passage of their corresponding component over retention pin 435 to disengage each of the rotational nut 440 and mid-plate 450 such that they “fall” toward a bottom plate (e.g., bottom plate 115 of
Finally, view 400C of
Referring now to
Beginning with
Referring now to
The exterior horizontal extent 524B for an impact surface may be larger than the exterior horizonal extent 524A for arms that lack an impact surface. Additionally, for arms that lack an impact surface, the interior horizontal extent 523 may be equal to the exterior horizontal extent 524A. In contrast, the exterior horizontal extent 524B, for each arm containing an impact surface, may be larger than the corresponding interior horizontal extent for that same arm. This also means that exterior horizontal extent 524B (for in impact arm) may be larger than the exterior horizontal extent 524A (for a non-impact arm). In other embodiments that are not illustrated, all arms of a rotational nut may have an impact surface and/or include a larger exterior horizontal extent.
Further, as illustrated in
Referring now to
As illustrated in the example embodiment shown for side view 500C, a total vertical extent 595 has been increased to 1.77 inches and allows an impact surface (e.g., impact surface 515A) to extend approximately 0.67 inches below a rotational nut lower surface 520 and 1.77 inches below rotational nut upper surface 510. For side view 500C, it is illustrated that a portion of the increased arm total extent 502 (2.99 inches in this example) may include an extra 0.43 inches attributable to extension beyond arm lateral extent 592 and an outer most portion of impact surface lateral extent 591.
Finally,
While the embodiments are described with reference to various implementations and exploitations, it will be understood that these embodiments are illustrative and that the scope of the inventive subject matter is not limited to specifically disclosed implementations. Many variations, modifications, additions, and improvements are possible. Additionally, the specific measurements disclosed herein may represent a minimum size as larger sizes may also recognize the benefits of the improvements disclosed herein.
Plural instances may be provided for components, operations, or structures described herein as a single instance. In general, structures and functionality presented as separate components in the exemplary configurations may be implemented as a combined structure or component. Similarly, structures and functionality presented as a single component may be implemented as separate components. These and other variations, modifications, additions, and improvements may fall within the scope of the inventive subject matter.
Insofar as the description above and the accompanying drawings disclose any additional subject matter that is not within the scope of the claim(s) herein, the inventions are not dedicated to the public and the right to file one or more applications to claim such additional invention is reserved. Although a very narrow claim may be presented herein, it should be recognized the scope of this invention is much broader than presented by the claim(s). Broader claims may be submitted in an application that claims the benefit of priority from this application.
Certain terms have been used throughout this description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, different parties may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In this disclosure and claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first component couples to a second component, that coupling may be through a direct connection or through an indirect connection via other components and connections. In this disclosure a direct connection will be referenced as a “connection” rather than a coupling. The recitation “based on” is intended to mean “based at least in part on.” Therefore, if X is based on Y, X may be a function of Y and any number of other factors.
The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various implementations of the present disclosure. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This Application is related to concurrently filed Application for US Patent, entitled, “SECONDARY JOIST PROFILE FOR GRID SYSTEMS,” by Bradley Bond, having application Ser. No. ______, which is incorporated by reference herein for all applicable purposes. This Application is also related to concurrently filed Application for US Patent, entitled, “MAIN BEAM PROFILE FOR GRID SYSTEMS,” by Bradley Bond, having application Ser. No. ______, which is incorporated by reference herein for all applicable purposes.