Physiological measurement systems employed in healthcare often feature visual and audible alarm mechanisms that alert a caregiver when a patient's vital signs are outside of predetermined limits. For example, a pulse oximeter, which measures the oxygen saturation level of arterial blood, indicates oxygen supply. A typical pulse oximetry system has a sensor that provides a signal output to a pulse oximeter monitor. The sensor has an emitter configured with both red and infrared LEDs that project light through a fleshy medium to a detector so as to determine the ratio of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin light absorption. The monitor has a signal processor, a display and an alarm. The signal processor inputs the conditioned and digitized sensor signal and calculates oxygen saturation (SpO2) along with pulse rate (PR), as is well-known in the art. The display provides a numerical readout of a patient's oxygen saturation and pulse rate. The alarm provides an audible indication when oxygen saturation or pulse rate are outside of predetermined limits.
Another pulse oximetry parameter is perfusion index (PI). PI is a measure of perfusion at the pulse oximetry sensor site comparing the pulsatile (AC) signal to the non-pulsatile (DC) signal, expressed as a percentage ratio. An example is the PI Delta Alarm™ feature of the Radical 7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter™ available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, which alerts clinicians to specified changes in PI. In particular, PI Delta indicates if PI at a monitored site decreases by a specific level (delta) over a specified window of time, with both variables selectable by the user within predetermined ranges.
Tracking a series of desaturations over time is one metric that is derived from SpO2 that is well-known in the art. See, e.g., Farney, Robert J., Jensen, Robert L.; Ear Oximetry to Detect Apnea and Differentiate Rapid Eye Movement (REM) and Non-REM (NREM) Sleep: Screening for the Sleep Apnea Syndrome; Chest; April 1986; pages 533-539, incorporated by reference herein. Traditional high and low SpO2 alarm limits alert clinicians to saturation levels that exceed user selected thresholds, and these thresholds are typically established at a considerable change from the patients' baseline saturation level. However, in select patient populations, substantial desaturation events that exceed a typical low alarm limit threshold may be preceded by a cycle of transient desaturations over a limited timeframe. The ability to alert clinicians to a cycle of these smaller desaturations provides an earlier indication of a potential significant decline in the patient's status and the need for more focused monitoring and/or a change in treatment. An example is the Desat Index Alarm™ feature of the Radical 7™, mentioned above, which enables clinicians to detect an increasing quantity of smaller desaturations that may precede declining respiratory status. Desat Index is a measure responsive to patients that experience a specific number of desaturations beyond a defined level from the patient's baseline saturation over a specific window of time, with each of these variables selectable by the user within predetermined ranges.
A physiological parameter that can be measured in addition to, or in lieu of, SpO2 is respiration rate (RR). A respiration rate monitor utilizes a body sound sensor with piezoelectric membranes particularly suited for the capture of acoustic waves and the conversion thereof into electric signals. To detect body sound, the piezoelectric membranes are used as mechano-electric transducers that are temporarily polarized when subject to a physical force, such as when subjected to the mechanical stress caused by the acoustic waves coming from the inside of a patient's body. The body sound sensor is typically attached to the suprasternal notch or at the lateral neck near the pharynx so as to detect tracheal sounds. A sound sensor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,661,161 entitled Piezoelectric Biological Sound Monitor With Printed Circuit Board, incorporated by reference herein. A respiration rate monitor is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/547,570 entitled Non-Invasive Monitoring of Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate and Apnea, incorporated by reference herein.
Conventional patient monitors give insufficient advance warning of deteriorating patient health or the onset of a potentially serious physiological condition. Advantageously, a drug administration controller is responsive to one or more physiological parameters in addition to, or in lieu of, SpO2 and PR, such as carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO), methemoglobin (HbMet), perfusion index (PI) and respiration rate (RR), to name a few. Further, a drug administration controller is advantageously responsive not only to preset parameter limits but also to various metrics derived from measured physiological parameters, such as trends, patterns and variability, alone or in combination, to name a few. As such, a drug administration controller is adapted to pausing or otherwise affecting drug administration based upon one or more physiological parameters and one or more metrics. Parameter variability is described with respect to PI in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/094,813 entitled Physiological Assessment System, incorporated by reference herein.
As an example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to changes in HbMet. Gaseous nitric oxide (NO) is increasingly recognized as an effective bacteriostatic or bacteriocidal agent. NO, however, can toxically increase HbMet.
A drug administration controller may be responsive to changes in perfusion index, such as measured by PI Delta, described above. PI may change dramatically in response to sympathetic changes in vasoconstriction or vasodilation of peripheral vessels caused by anesthesia or pain. For example, painful stimulus causes a significant decline of perfusion index.
As another example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to a cycle of transient desaturations over a limited timeframe, such as indicated by Desat Index, described above. Patients receiving pain medication may be predisposed to respiratory depression. If the patient has an underlying respiratory condition, pain medication may cause the patient to spiral into a cascade of cyclic desaturations, which initially are mild but may worsen quickly, leading to respiratory depression and even arrest.
As a further example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to respiration rate (RR) monitoring, as described above. RR provides an accurate marker for indicating acute respiratory dysfunction. For example, during conscious sedation, there is a risk of respiratory depression, and changes in RR typically provide an earlier warning than does pulse oximetry alone.
and
As shown in
Also shown in
In one embodiment, sensors 106 include a pulse oximetry sensor, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,757 entitled Low Noise Optical Probes and physiological measurement devices 108 include a pulse oximeter, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,272 entitled Signal Processing Apparatus, both assigned to Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA and both incorporated by reference herein. In another embodiment, sensors 106 and measurement devices 108 include a multiple wavelength sensor and a corresponding noninvasive blood parameter monitor, such as the RAD57™ and Radical7™ for measuring SpO2, CO, HbMet, pulse rate, perfusion index and signal quality. The RAD-57 and Radical-7 are available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA. In other embodiments, sensors 106 also include any of LNOP® adhesive or reusable sensors, SofTouch™ sensors, Hi-Fi Trauma™ or Blue™ sensor all available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA. Further, measurement devices 108 also include any of Radical®, SatShare™, Rad-9™, Rad5™, Rad-5v™ or PPO+™ Masimo SET® pulse oximeters all available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA.
In a particular embodiment, the control or monitor outputs 102 or both are responsive to a Desat Index or a PI Delta or both, as described above. In another particular embodiment, one or more of the measurement devices 108, the parameter processor 101 and the drug administrative device 104 are incorporated within a single unit. For example, the devices may be incorporated within a single housing, or the devices may be separately housed but physically and proximately connected.
Although sensors 106 are described above with respect to noninvasive technologies, sensors 106 may be invasive or noninvasive. Invasive measurements may require a person to prepare a blood or tissue sample, which is then processed by a physiological measurement device.
In one embodiment, the administered drug is a nitrate, such as sodium nitroprusside, and the blood parameter monitored is HbMet. In a particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output according to one or more entries in TABLE 1. In another particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output according to one or more entries in TABLE 2. In yet another embodiment, a blood parameter monitor 208 confirms that the measurement of HbMet is accurate, such as by checking a signal quality parameter or by having multiple sensors 206 on the patient 1.
Another embodiment involves patient controlled analgesia (PCA), i.e. the administered drug is an analgesia, and administration of the drug is controlled by the patient according to perceived pain levels. Analgesia administration, however, is paused in response to one or more blood parameters and corresponding metrics. In one embodiment, the blood parameter monitored is SpO2 and the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output responsive to Desat Index. In a particular embodiment, PCA is paused or disabled according to TART
In another embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output responsive to a PI indication of pain. In this manner, the administration of anesthesia is controlled according to the patient's perceived pain level. In a particular embodiment, PCA is paused or enabled according to one or more entries of TABLE 4, where a falling PI results in a negative PI Delta relative to an established baseline.
In one embodiment, the administered medical gas is a NO, and the blood parameter monitored is HbMet. In a particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 308 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 6. In another particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 308 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 7. In yet another embodiment, a blood parameter monitor 308 confirms that the measurement of HbMet is accurate, such as by checking a signal quality parameter or by having multiple sensors 306 on the patient 1. In a further embodiment, the administered medical gas is CO, and the blood parameter monitored is HbCO.
As shown in
User I/O 60, external devices 70 and wireless communication 80 also interface with the parameter processor 101 and provide communications to the outside world. User I/O 60 allows manual data entry and control. For example, a menu-driven operator display may be provided to allow entry of predetermined alarm thresholds. External devices 70 may include PCs and network interfaces to name a few.
As shown in
Also shown in
Further shown in
A drug administration controller has been disclosed in detail in connection with various embodiments. These embodiments are disclosed by way of examples only and are not to limit the scope of the claims that follow. One of ordinary skill in art will appreciate many variations and modifications.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/104,782, filed Nov. 25, 2020, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/094,100, filed Apr. 8, 2016, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,136, filed May 18, 2012, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/654,904, filed Jan. 17, 2007, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/759,673, filed Jan. 17, 2006, entitled Drug Administration Controller, and Ser. No. 60/764,946, filed Feb. 2, 2006, entitled Drug Administration Controller, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60759673 | Jan 2006 | US | |
60764946 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15094100 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 17104782 | US | |
Parent | 13475136 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 15094100 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17104782 | Nov 2020 | US |
Child | 18342344 | US | |
Parent | 11654904 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 13475136 | US |