Patent Grant
10350391
There is a need for medical device technology that can rapidly, efficiently, reproducibly and safely transfer a Drug Delivery Formulation from the surface of a percutaneous medical device (a coating) onto/into a specific site in the body.
Provided herein is a medical device comprising: a balloon; and a coating on at least a portion of the balloon, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, and wherein the device releases at least 3% of the active agent to artery upon inflation of the balloon in vivo
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the active agent comprises a pharmaceutical agent.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the pharmaceutical agent comprises a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. In some embodiments the macrolide immunosuppressive drug comprises one or more of rapamycin, 40-O-(2-Hydroxyethyl)rapamycin (everolimus), 40-O-Benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-(4′-Hydroxymethyl)benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[4′-(1,2-Dihydroxyethyl)]benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-Allyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[3′-(2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4(S)-yl)-prop-2′-en-1′-yl]-rapamycin, (2′:E,4′S)-40-O-(4′,5′-Dihydroxypent-2′-en-1′-yl)-rapamycin 40-O-(2-Hydroxy)ethoxycar-bonylmethyl-rapamycin, 40-O-(3-Hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(6-Hydroxy)hexyl-rapamycin 4O—O-[2-(2-Hydroxy)ethoxy]ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-[(3S)-2,2-Dimethyldioxolan-3-yljmethyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[(2S)-2,3-Dihydroxyprop-1-yl]-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Acetoxy)ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-Nicotinoyloxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 4O—O-[2-(N-Morpholino)acetoxy]ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-N-Imidazolylacetoxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(N-Methyl-N′-piperazinyl)acetoxy]ethyl-rapamycin, 39-O-Desmethyl-39,40-O,O-ethylene-rapamycin, (26R)-26-Dihydro-40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 28-O-Methyl-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Aminoethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Acetaminoethyl)-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-Nicotinamidoethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-(N-Methyl-imidazo-2′-ylcarbethoxamido)ethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Ethoxycarbonylaminoethyl)-rapamycin, 40-O-(2-Tolylsulfonamidoethyl)-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(4′,5′-Dicarboethoxy-r,2′,3′-triazol-r-yl)-ethyl]-rapamycin, 42-Epi-(tetrazolyl)rapamycin (tacrolimus), and 42-[3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropanoate]rapamycin (temsirolimus).
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the macro lide immunosuppressive drug is at least 50% crystalline. In some embodiments, the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 75% crystalline. In some embodiments, the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 90% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 95% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 97% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 98% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 99% crystalline.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein wherein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 50% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 75% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 90% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 95% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 97% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein pharmaceutical agent is at least 98% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 99% crystalline.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating comprises a bioabsorbable polymer. In some embodiments, the active agent comprises a bioabsorbable polymer. In some embodiments, the bioabsorbable polymer comprises at least one of: Polylactides (PLA); PLGA (poly(lactide-co-glycolide)); Polyanhydrides; Polyorthoesters; Poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide); DLPLA—poly(dl-lactide); LPLA—poly(1-lactide); PGA—polyglycolide; PDO— poly(dioxanone); PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate); PGA-LPLA—poly(1-lactide-co-glycolide); PGA-DLPLA—pob^dl-lactide-co-glycolide); LPLA-DLPLA—polyO-lactide-co-dl-lactide); and PDO-PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate-co-dioxanone), and combinations, copolymers, and derivatives thereof. In some embodiments, the bioabsorbable polymer comprises between 1% and 95% glycolic acid content PLGA-based polymer.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the polymer comprises at least one of polycarboxylic acids, cellulosic polymers, proteins, polypeptides, polyvinylpyrrolidone, maleic anhydride polymers, polyamides, polyvinyl alcohols, polyethylene oxides, glycosaminoglycans, polysaccharides, polyesters, aliphatic polyesters, polyurethanes, polystyrenes, copolymers, silicones, silicone containing polymers, polyalkyl siloxanes, polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides, copolymers of vinyl monomers, polycarbonates, polyethylenes, polypropytenes, polylactic acids, polylactides, polyglycolic acids, polyglycolides, polylactide-co-glycolides, polycaprolactones, poly(e-caprolactone)s, polyhydroxybutyrate valerates, polyacrylamides, polyethers, polyurethane dispersions, polyacrylates, acrylic latex dispersions, polyacrylic acid, polyalkyl methacrylates, polyalkylene-co-vinyl acetates, polyalkylenes, aliphatic polycarbonates polyhydroxyalkanoates, polytetrahalooalkylenes, poly(phosphasones), polytetrahalooalkylenes, poly(phosphasones), and mixtures, combinations, and copolymers thereof. The polymers of the present invention may be natural or synthetic in origin, including gelatin, chitosan, dextrin, cyclodextrin, Poly(urethanes), Poly(siloxanes) or silicones, Poly(acrylates) such as [rho]oly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and Poly(2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate), Poly(vinyl alcohol) Poly(olefms) such as poly(ethylene), [rho]oly(isoprene), halogenated polymers such as Poly(tetrafluoroethylene)—and derivatives and copolymers such as those commonly sold as Teflon® products, Poly(vinylidine fluoride), Poly(vinyl acetate), Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), Poly(acrylic acid), Polyacrylamide, Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), Poly(ethylene glycol), Poly(propylene glycol), Poly(methacrylic acid); etc. Suitable polymers also include absorbable and/or resorbable polymers including the following, combinations, copolymers and derivatives of the following: Polylactides (PLA), Polyglycolides (PGA), PolyLactide-co-glycolides (PLGA), Polyanhydrides, Polyorthoesters, Poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide), Poly(1-aspartamide), including the derivatives DLPLA—poly(dl-lactide); LPLA—poly(l-lactide); PDO—poly(dioxanone); PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate); PGA-LPLA—poly(1-lactide-co-glycolide); PGA-DLPLA—pob^dl-lactide-co-glycolide); LPLA-DLPLA—polyO-lactide-co-dl-lactide); and PDO-PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate-co-dioxanone), and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the polymer has a dry modulus between 3,000 and 12,000 KPa. In some embodiments, the polymer is capable of becoming soft after implantation. In some embodiments, the polymer is capable of becoming soft after implantation by hydration, degradation or by a combination of hydration and degradation. In some embodiments, the polymer is adapted to transfer, free, and/or dissociate from the substrate when at the intervention site due to hydrolysis of the polymer.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the bioabsorbable polymer is capable of resorbtion in at least one of: about 1 day, about 3 days, about 5 days, about 7 days, about 14 days, about 3 weeks, about 4 weeks, about 45 days, about 60 days, about 90 days, about 180 days, about 6 months, about 9 months, about 1 year, about 1 to about 2 days, about 1 to about 5 days, about 1 to about 2 weeks, about 2 to about 4 weeks, about 45 to about 60 days, about 45 to about 90 days, about 30 to about 90 days, about 60 to about 90 days, about 90 to about 180 days, about 60 to about 180 days, about 180 to about 365 days, about 6 months to about 9 months, about 9 months to about 12 months, about 9 months to about 15 months, and about 1 year to about 2 years.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating comprises a microstructure. In some embodiments, particles of the active agent are sequestered or encapsulated within the microstructure. In some embodiments, the microstructure comprises microchannels, micropores and/or microcavities. In some embodiments, the microstructure is selected to allow sustained release of the active agent. In some embodiments, the microstructure is selected to allow controlled release of the active agent.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing a polymer and/or the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, wherein the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising at least one of: depositing a polymer by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process, and depositing the pharmaceutical agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising at least one of: depositing a polymer by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process, and depositing the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process. In some embodiments, the process of forming the coating provides improved adherence of the coating to the substrate prior to deployment of the device at the intervention site and facilitates dissociation of the coating from the substrate at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without electrically charging the substrate. In some embodiments, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing the active agent on the substrate by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without creating an electrical potential between the substrate and a coating apparatus used to deposit the coating.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the intervention site is in or on the body of a subject. In some embodiments, the intervention site is a vascular wall. In some embodiments, the intervention site is a non-vascular lumen wall. In some embodiments, the intervention site is a vascular cavity wall.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the intervention site is a wall of a body cavity. In some embodiments, the body cavity is the result of a lumpectomy. In some embodiments, the intervention site is a cannulized site within a subject.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the intervention site is a sinus wall. In some embodiments, the intervention site is a sinus cavity wall. In some embodiments, the active agent comprises a corticosteroid.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating is capable of at least one of: retarding healing, delaying healing, and preventing healing. In some embodiments, the coating is capable of at least one of: retarding, delaying, and preventing the inflammatory phase of healing. In some embodiments, the coating is capable of at least one of: retarding, delaying, and preventing the proliferative phase of healing. In some embodiments, the coating is capable of at least one of: retarding, delaying, and preventing the maturation phase of healing. In some embodiments, the coating is capable of at least one of: retarding, delaying, and preventing the remodeling phase of healing. In some embodiments, the active agent comprises an anti-angiogenic agent.
Provided herein is a method comprising providing a medical device, wherein the medical device comprises a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, and wherein the coating comprises a plurality of layers, wherein at least one layer comprises a pharmaceutical agent in a therapeutically desirable morphology, and transferring at least a portion of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention is explained in greater detail below. This description is not intended to be a detailed catalog of all the different ways in which the invention may be implemented, or all the features that may be added to the instant invention. For example, features illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be incorporated into other embodiments, and features illustrated with respect to a particular embodiment may be deleted from that embodiment. In addition, numerous variations and additions to the various embodiments suggested herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the instant disclosure, which do not depart from the instant invention. Hence, the following specification is intended to illustrate some particular embodiments of the invention, and not to exhaustively specify all permutations, combinations and variations thereof.
As used in the present specification, the following words and phrases are generally intended to have the meanings as set forth below, except to the extent that the context in which they are used indicates otherwise.
“Substrate” as used herein, refers to any surface upon which it is desirable to deposit a coating. Biomedical implants are of particular interest for the present invention; however the present invention is not intended to be restricted to this class of substrates. Those of skill in the art will appreciate alternate substrates that could benefit from the coating process described herein, such as pharmaceutical tablet cores, as part of an assay apparatus or as components in a diagnostic kit (e.g. a test strip). Examples of substrates that can be coated using the methods of the invention include surgery devices or medical devices, e.g., a catheter, a balloon, a cutting balloon, a wire guide, a cannula, tooling, an orthopedic device, a structural implant, stent, stent-graft, graft, vena cava filter, a heart valve, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, pacemaker electrodes, axius coronary shunts, endocardial leads, an artificial heart, and the like.
“Biomedical implant” as used herein refers to any implant for insertion into the body of a human or animal subject, including but not limited to stents (e.g., coronary stents, vascular stents including peripheral stents and graft stents, urinary tract stents, urethral/prostatic stents, rectal stent, oesophageal stent, biliary stent, pancreatic stent), electrodes, catheters, leads, implantable pacemaker, cardioverter or defibrillator housings, joints, screws, rods, ophthalmic implants, femoral pins, bone plates, grafts, anastomotic devices, perivascular wraps, sutures, staples, shunts for hydrocephalus, dialysis grafts, colostomy bag attachment devices, ear drainage tubes, leads for pace makers and implantable cardioverters and defibrillators, vertebral disks, bone pins, suture anchors, hemostatic barriers, clamps, screws, plates, clips, vascular implants, tissue adhesives and sealants, tissue scaffolds, various types of dressings (e.g., wound dressings), bone substitutes, intraluminal devices, vascular supports, etc.
The implants may be formed from any suitable material, including but not limited to polymers (including stable or inert polymers, organic polymers, organic-inorganic copolymers, inorganic polymers, and biodegradable polymers), metals, metal alloys, inorganic materials such as silicon, and composites thereof, including layered structures with a core of one material and one or more coatings of a different material. Substrates made of a conducting material facilitate electrostatic capture. However, the invention contemplates the use of electrostatic capture, as described herein, in conjunction with substrate having low conductivity or which are non-conductive. To enhance electrostatic capture when a non-conductive substrate is employed, the substrate is processed for example while maintaining a strong electrical field in the vicinity of the substrate. In some embodiments, however, no electrostatic capture is employed in applying a coating to the substrate. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the substrate is not charged in the coating process. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, an electrical potential is not created between the substrate and the coating apparatus.
Subjects into which biomedical implants of the invention may be applied or inserted include both human subjects (including male and female subjects and infant, juvenile, adolescent, adult and geriatric subjects) as well as animal subjects (including but not limited to pig, rabbit, mouse, dog, cat, horse, monkey, etc.) for veterinary purposes and/or medical research.
As used herein, a biological implant may include a medical device that is not permanently implanted. A biological implant in some embodiments may comprise a device which is used in a subject on a transient basis. For non-limiting example, the biomedical implant may be a balloon, which is used transiently to dilate a lumen and thereafter may be deflated and/or removed from the subject during the medical procedure or thereafter. In some embodiments, the biological implant may be temporarily implanted for a limited time, such as during a portion of a medical procedure, or for only a limited time (some time less than permanently implanted), or may be transiently implanted and/or momentarily placed in the subject. In some embodiments, the biological implant is not implanted at all, rather it is merely inserted into a subject during a medical procedure, and subsequently removed from the subject prior to or at the time the medical procedure is completed. In some embodiments, the biological implant is not permanently implanted since it completely resorbs into the subject (i.e. is completely resorbed by the subject). In a preferred embodiment the biomedical implant is an expandable balloon that can be expanded within a lumen (naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring) having a coating thereon that is freed (at least in part) from the balloon and left behind in the lumen when the balloon is removed from the lumen.
Examples of pharmaceutical agents employed in conjunction with the invention include, rapamycin, 40-O-(2-Hydroxyethyl)rapamycin (everolimus), 40-O-Benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-(4′-Hydroxymethyl)benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[4′-(1,2-Dihydroxyethyl)]benzyl-rapamycin, 40-O-AUyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[3I-(2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4(S)-yl)-prop-2I-en-1I-yl]-rapamycin, (2′:E,4′S)-40-O-(4′,5′-Dihydroxypent-2′-en-r-yl)-rapamycin 40-O-(2-Hydroxy)ethoxycar-bonylmethyl-rapamycin, 40-O-(3-Hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(6-Hydroxy)hexyl-rapamycin 40-O-[2-(2-Hydroxy)ethoxy]ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-[(3S)-2,2-Dimethyldioxolan-3-yl]methyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[(2S)-2,3-Dihydroxyprop-1-yl]-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Acetoxy)ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-Nicotinoyloxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 4O—O-[2-(N-Morpholino)acetoxy]ethyl-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-N-Imidazolylacetoxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(N-Methyl-N′-piperazinyl)acetoxy]ethyl-rapamycin, 39-O-Desmethyl-39,40-O,O-ethylene-rapamycin, (26R)-26-Dihydro-40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin, 28-O-Methyl-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Aminoethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Acetaminoethyl)-rapamycin 4O—O-(2-Nicotinamidoethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-(N-Methyl-imidazo-2′-ylcarbethoxamido)ethyl)-rapamycin, 4O—O-(2-Ethoxycarbonylaminoethyl)-rapamycin, 40-O-(2-Tolylsulfonamidoethyl)-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(4′,5′-Dicarboethoxy-r,2′,3′-triazol-r-yl)-ethyl]-rapamycin, 42-Epi-(tetrazolyl)rapamycin (tacrolimus), and 42-[3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropanoate]rapamycin (temsirolimus).
The pharmaceutical agents may, if desired, also be used in the form of their pharmaceutically acceptable salts or derivatives (meaning salts which retain the biological effectiveness and properties of the compounds of this invention and which are not biologically or otherwise undesirable), and in the case of chiral active ingredients it is possible to employ both optically active isomers and racemates or mixtures of diastereoisomers. As well, the pharmaceutical agent may include a prodrug, a hydrate, an ester, a polymorph, a derivative or analogs of a compound or molecule.
The pharmaceutical agent may be an antibiotic agent, as described herein.
“Prodrugs” are derivative compounds derivatized by the addition of a group that endows greater solubility to the compound desired to be delivered. Once in the body, the prodrug is typically acted upon by an enzyme, e.g., an esterase, amidase, or phosphatase, to generate the active compound.
An “anti-cancer agent”, “anti-tumor agent” or “chemotherapeutic agent” refers to any agent useful in the treatment of a neoplastic condition. There are many chemotherapeutic agents available in commercial use, in clinical evaluation and in pre-clinical development that are useful in the devices and methods of the present invention for treatment of cancers.
“Stability” as used herein in refers to the stability of the drug in a coating deposited on a substrate in its final product form (e.g., stability of the drug in a coated stent). The term “stability” and/or “stable” in some embodiments is defined by 5% or less degradation of the drug in the final product form. The term stability in some embodiments is defined by 3% or less degradation of the drug in the final product form. The term stability in some embodiments is defined by 2% or less degradation of the drug in the final product form. The term stability in some embodiments is defined by 1% or less degradation of the drug in the final product form.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent is at least one of: 50% crystalline, 75% crystalline, 80% crystalline, 90% crystalline, 95% crystalline, 97% crystalline, and 99% crystalline following sterilization of the device. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent crystallinity is stable wherein the crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent following sterilization is compared to the crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent at least one of: 1 week after sterilization, 2 weeks after sterilization, 4 weeks after sterilization, 1 month after sterilization, 2 months after sterilization, 45 days after sterilization, 60 days after sterilization, 90 days after sterilization, 3 months after sterilization, 4 months after sterilization, 6 months after sterilization, 9 months after sterilization, 12 months after sterilization, 18 months after sterilization, and 2 years after sterilization. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent crystallinity is stable wherein the crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent prior to sterilization is compared to the crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent at least one of: 1 week after sterilization, 2 weeks after sterilization, 4 weeks after sterilization, 1 month after sterilization, 2 months after sterilization, 45 days after sterilization, 60 days after sterilization, 90 days after sterilization, 3 months after sterilization, 4 months after sterilization, 6 months after sterilization, 9 months after sterilization, 12 months after sterilization, 18 months after sterilization, and 2 years after sterilization. In such embodiments, different devices may be tested from the same manufacturing lot to determine stability of the pharmaceutical agent at the desired time points.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent crystallinity is stable at at least one of: 1 week after sterilization, 2 weeks after sterilization, 4 weeks after sterilization, 1 month after sterilization, 2 months after sterilization, 45 days after sterilization, 60 days after sterilization, 90 days after sterilization, 3 months after sterilization, 4 months after sterilization, 6 months after sterilization, 9 months after sterilization, 12 months after sterilization, 18 months after sterilization, and 2 years after sterilization.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent crystallinity on the device tested at a time point after sterilization does not differ more than 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and/or 5% from the crystallinity tested on a second device manufactured from the same lot of devices and the same lot of pharmaceutical agent at testing time point before sterilization (i.e. the crystallinity drops no more than from 99 to 94% crystalline, for example, which is a 5% difference in crystallinity; the crystallinity drops no more than from 99 to 95% crystalline, which is a 4% difference in crystallinity; the crystallinity drops no more than from 99 to 96% crystalline, for example, which is a 3% difference in crystallinity; the crystallinity drops no more than from 99 to 97% crystalline, for example, which is a 2% difference in crystallinity; the crystallinity drops no more than from 99 to 98% crystalline, for example, which is a 1% difference in crystallinity; in other examples, the starting crystallinity percentage is one of 100%, 98%, 96%, 97%, 96%, 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 30%, 25%, and/or anything in between).
In some embodiments, crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent on the device tested at a time point after sterilization does not differ more than 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and/or 5% from the crystallinity of pharmaceutical from the same lot of pharmaceutical agent tested at testing time point before sterilization of the pharmaceutical agent.
In some embodiments, crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent does not drop more than 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and/or 5% between two testing time points after sterilization neither of which time point being greater than 2 years after sterilization. In some embodiments, crystallinity of the pharmaceutical agent does not drop more than 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and/or 5% between two testing time points after sterilization neither of which time point being greater than 5 years after sterilization. In some embodiments, two time points comprise two of: 1 week after sterilization, 2 weeks after sterilization, 4 weeks after sterilization, 1 month after sterilization, 2 months after sterilization, 45 days after sterilization, 60 days after sterilization, 90 days after sterilization, 3 months after sterilization, 4 months after sterilization, 6 months after sterilization, 9 months after sterilization, 12 months after sterilization, 18 months after sterilization, 2 years after sterilization, 3 years after sterilization, 4 years after sterilization, and 5 years after sterilization.
“Polymer” as used herein, refers to a series of repeating monomeric units that have been cross-linked or polymerized. Any suitable polymer can be used to carry out the present invention. It is possible that the polymers of the invention may also comprise two, three, four or more different polymers. In some embodiments of the invention only one polymer is used. In certain embodiments a combination of two polymers is used. Combinations of polymers can be in varying ratios, to provide coatings with differing properties. Polymers useful in the devices and methods of the present invention include, for example, stable or inert polymers, organic polymers, organic-inorganic copolymers, inorganic polymers, bioabsorbable, bioresorbable, resorbable, degradable, and biodegradable polymers. Those of skill in the art of polymer chemistry will be familiar with the different properties of polymeric compounds.
In some embodiments, the coating further comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the active agent comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the polymer comprises at least one of polyalkyl methacrylates, polyalkylene-co-vinyl acetates, polyalkylenes, polyurethanes, polyanhydrides, aliphatic polycarbonates, polyhydroxyalkanoates, silicone containing polymers, polyalkyl siloxanes, aliphatic polyesters, polyglycolides, polylactides, polylactide-co-glycolides, poly(e-caprolactone)s, polytetrahalooalkylenes, polystyrenes, poly(phosphasones), copolymers thereof, and combinations thereof.
In embodiments, the polymer is capable of becoming soft after implantation, for example, due to hydration, degradation or by a combination of hydration and degradation. In embodiments, the polymer is adapted to transfer, free, and/or dissociate from the substrate when at the intervention site due to hydrolysis of the polymer. In various embodiments, the device is coated with a bioabsorbable polymer that is capable of resorbtion in at least one of: about 1 day, about 3 days, about 5 days, about 7 days, about 14 days, about 3 weeks, about 4 weeks, about 45 days, about 60 days, about 90 days, about 180 days, about 6 months, about 9 months, about 1 year, about 1 to about 2 days, about 1 to about 5 days, about 1 to about 2 weeks, about 2 to about 4 weeks, about 45 to about 60 days, about 45 to about 90 days, about 30 to about 90 days, about 60 to about 90 days, about 90 to about 180 days, about 60 to about 180 days, about 180 to about 365 days, about 6 months to about 9 months, about 9 months to about 12 months, about 9 months to about 15 months, and about 1 year to about 2 years.
Examples of polymers that may be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to polycarboxylic acids, cellulosic polymers, proteins, polypeptides, polyvinylpyrrolidone, maleic anhydride polymers, polyamides, polyvinyl alcohols, polyethylene oxides, glycosaminoglycans, polysaccharides, polyesters, aliphatic polyesters, polyurethanes, polystyrenes, copolymers, silicones, silicone containing polymers, polyalkyl siloxanes, polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides, copolymers of vinyl monomers, polycarbonates, polyethylenes, polypropytenes, polylactic acids, polylactides, polyglycolic acids, polyglycolides, polylactide-co-glycolides, polycaprolactones, poly(e-caprolactone)s, polyhydroxybutyrate valerates, polyacrylamides, polyethers, polyurethane dispersions, polyacrylates, acrylic latex dispersions, polyacrylic acid, polyalkyl methacrylates, polyalkylene-co-vinyl acetates, polyalkylenes, aliphatic polycarbonates polyhydroxyalkanoates, polytetrahalooalkylenes, poly(phosphasones), polytetrahalooalkylenes, poly(phosphasones), and mixtures, combinations, and copolymers thereof.
The polymers of the present invention may be natural or synthetic in origin, including gelatin, chitosan, dextrin, cyclodextrin, Poly(urethanes), Poly(siloxanes) or silicones, Poly(acrylates) such as [rho]oly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and Poly(2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate), Poly(vinyl alcohol) Poly(olefms) such as poly(ethylene), [rho]oly(isoprene), halogenated polymers such as Poly(tetrafluoroethylene)—and derivatives and copolymers such as those commonly sold as Teflon® products, Poly(vinylidine fluoride), Poly(vinyl acetate), Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), Poly(acrylic acid), Polyacrylamide, Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), Poly(ethylene glycol), Poly(propylene glycol), Poly(methacrylic acid); etc.
Suitable polymers also include absorbable and/or resorbable polymers including the following, combinations, copolymers and derivatives of the following: Polylactides (PLA), Polyglycolides (PGA), PolyLactide-co-glycolides (PLGA), Polyanhydrides, Polyorthoesters, Poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide), Poly(1-aspartamide), including the derivatives DLPLA—poly(dl-lactide); LPLA—poly(1-lactide); PDO—poly(dioxanone); PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate); PGA-LPLA—poly(1-lactide-co-glycolide); PGA-DLPLA—pob^dl-lactide-co-glycolide); LPLA-DLPLA—polyO-lactide-co-dl-lactide); and PDO-PGA-TMC—poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate-co-dioxanone), and combinations thereof.
“Copolymer” as used herein refers to a polymer being composed of two or more different monomers. A copolymer may also and/or alternatively refer to random, block, graft, copolymers known to those of skill in the art.
“Biocompatible” as used herein, refers to any material that does not cause injury or death to the animal or induce an adverse reaction in an animal when placed in intimate contact with the animal's tissues. Adverse reactions include for example inflammation, infection, fibrotic tissue formation, cell death, or thrombosis. The terms “biocompatible” and “biocompatibility” when used herein are art-recognized and mean that the referent is neither itself toxic to a host (e.g., an animal or human), nor degrades (if it degrades) at a rate that produces byproducts (e.g., monomeric or oligomeric subunits or other byproducts) at toxic concentrations, causes inflammation or irritation, or induces an immune reaction in the host. It is not necessary that any subject composition have a purity of 100% to be deemed biocompatible. Hence, a subject composition may comprise 99%, 98%, 97%, 96%, 95%, 90% 85%, 80%, 75% or even less of biocompatible agents, e.g., including polymers and other materials and excipients described herein, and still be biocompatible. “Non-biocompatible” as used herein, refers to any material that may cause injury or death to the animal or induce an adverse reaction in the animal when placed in intimate contact with the animal's tissues. Such adverse reactions are as noted above, for example.
The terms “bioabsorbable,” “biodegradable,” “bioerodible,” “bioresorbable,” and “resorbable” are art-recognized synonyms. These terms are used herein interchangeably. Bioabsorbable polymers typically differ from non-bioabsorbable polymers in that the former may be absorbed (e.g.; degraded) during use. In certain embodiments, such use involves in vivo use, such as in vivo therapy, and in other certain embodiments, such use involves in vitro use. In general, degradation attributable to biodegradability involves the degradation of a bioabsorbable polymer into its component subunits, or digestion, e.g., by a biochemical process, of the polymer into smaller, non-polymeric subunits. In certain embodiments, biodegradation may occur by enzymatic mediation, degradation in the presence of water (hydrolysis) and/or other chemical species in the body, or both. The bioabsorbability of a polymer may be shown in-vitro as described herein or by methods known to one of skill in the art. An in-vitro test for bioabsorbability of a polymer does not require living cells or other biologic materials to show bioabsorption properties (e.g. degradation, digestion). Thus, resorbtion, resorption, absorption, absorbtion, erosion may also be used synonymously with the terms “bioabsorbable,” “biodegradable,” “bioerodible,” and “bioresorbable.” Mechanisms of degradation of a bioaborbable polymer may include, but are not limited to, bulk degradation, surface erosion, and combinations thereof.
As used herein, the term “biodegradation” encompasses both general types of biodegradation. The degradation rate of a biodegradable polymer often depends in part on a variety of factors, including the chemical identity of the linkage responsible for any degradation, the molecular weight, crystallinity, biostability, and degree of cross-linking of such polymer, the physical characteristics (e.g., shape and size) of the implant, and the mode and location of administration. For example, the greater the molecular weight, the higher the degree of crystallinity, and/or the greater the biostability, the biodegradation of any bioabsorbable polymer is usually slower.
“Degradation” as used herein refers to the conversion or reduction of a chemical compound to one less complex, e.g., by splitting off one or more groups of atoms. Degradation of the coating may reduce the coating's cohesive and adhesive binding to the device, thereby facilitating transfer of the coating to the intervention site.
“Therapeutically desirable morphology” as used herein refers to the gross form and structure of the pharmaceutical agent, once deposited on the substrate, so as to provide for optimal conditions of ex vivo storage, in vivo preservation and/or in vivo release. Such optimal conditions may include, but are not limited to increased shelf life (i.e., shelf stability), increased in vivo stability, good biocompatibility, good bioavailability or modified release rates. Typically, for the present invention, the desired morphology of a pharmaceutical agent would be crystalline or semi-crystalline or amorphous, although this may vary widely depending on many factors including, but not limited to, the nature of the pharmaceutical agent, the disease to be treated/prevented, the intended storage conditions for the substrate prior to use or the location within the body of any biomedical implant. Preferably at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, and/or 100% of the pharmaceutical agent is in crystalline or semi-crystalline form.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the macro lide immunosuppressive drug is at least 50% crystalline. In some embodiments, the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 75% crystalline. In some embodiments, the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 90% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 95% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 97% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 98% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the macrolide immunosuppressive drug is at least 99% crystalline.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein wherein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 50% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 75% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 90% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 95% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 97% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein pharmaceutical agent is at least 98% crystalline. In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein the pharmaceutical agent is at least 99% crystalline.
“Stabilizing agent” as used herein refers to any substance that maintains or enhances the stability of the biological agent. Ideally these stabilizing agents are classified as Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS) materials by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Examples of stabilizing agents include, but are not limited to carrier proteins, such as albumin, gelatin, metals or inorganic salts. Pharmaceutically acceptable excipient that may be present can further be found in the relevant literature, for example in the Handbook of Pharmaceutical Additives: An International Guide to More Than 6000 Products by Trade Name, Chemical, Function, and Manufacturer; Michael and Irene Ash (Eds.); Gower Publishing Ltd.; Aldershot, Hampshire, England, 1995.
“Intervention site” as used herein refers to the location in the body where the coating is intended to be delivered (by transfer from, freeing from, and/or dissociating from the substrate). The intervention site can be any substance in the medium surrounding the device, e.g., tissue, cartilage, a body fluid, etc. The intervention site can be the same as the treatment site, i.e., the substance to which the coating is delivered is the same tissue that requires treatment. Alternatively, the intervention site can be separate from the treatment site, requiring subsequent diffusion or transport of the pharmaceutical or other agent away from the intervention site.
“Compressed fluid” as used herein refers to a fluid of appreciable density (e.g., >0.2 g/cc) that is a gas at standard temperature and pressure. “Supercritical fluid,” “near-critical fluid,” “near-supercritical fluid,” “critical fluid,” “densified fluid,” or “densified gas,” as used herein refers to a compressed fluid under conditions wherein the temperature is at least 80% of the critical temperature of the fluid and the pressure is at least 50% of the critical pressure of the fluid, and/or a density of +50% of the critical density of the fluid.
Examples of substances that demonstrate supercritical or near critical behavior suitable for the present invention include, but are not limited to carbon dioxide, isobutylene, ammonia, water, methanol, ethanol, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, dimethyl ether, xenon, sulfur hexafluoride, halogenated and partially halogenated materials such as chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons (such as perfluoromethane and perfuoropropane, chloroform, trichloro-fluoromethane, dichloro-difluoromethane, dichloro-tetrafluoroethane) and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the supercritical fluid is hexafluoropropane (FC-236EA), or 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane. Preferably, the supercritical fluid is hexafluoropropane (FC-236EA), or 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane for use in PLGA polymer coatings.
“Sintering” as used herein refers to the process by which parts of the polymer or the entire polymer becomes continuous (e.g., formation of a continuous polymer film). As discussed herein, the sintering process is controlled to produce a fully conformal continuous polymer (complete sintering) or to produce regions or domains of continuous coating while producing voids (discontinuities) in the polymer. As well, the sintering process is controlled such that some phase separation is obtained or maintained between polymer different polymers (e.g., polymers A and B) and/or to produce phase separation between discrete polymer particles. Through the sintering process, the adhesions properties of the coating are improved to reduce flaking of detachment of the coating from the substrate during manipulation in use. As described herein, in some embodiments, the sintering process is controlled to provide incomplete sintering of the polymer. In embodiments involving incomplete sintering, a polymer is formed with continuous domains, and voids, gaps, cavities, pores, channels or, interstices that provide space for sequestering a therapeutic agent which is released under controlled conditions. Depending on the nature of the polymer, the size of polymer particles and/or other polymer properties, a compressed gas, a densifted gas, a near critical fluid or a super-critical fluid may be employed. In one example, carbon dioxide is used to treat a substrate that has been coated with a polymer and a drug, using dry powder and RESS electrostatic coating processes. In another example, isobutylene is employed in the sintering process. In other examples a mixture of carbon dioxide and isobutylene is employed. In another example, 1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane is employed in the sintering process.
When an amorphous material is heated to a temperature above its glass transition temperature, or when a crystalline material is heated to a temperature above a phase transition temperature, the molecules comprising the material are more mobile, which in turn means that they are more active and thus more prone to reactions such as oxidation. However, when an amorphous material is maintained at a temperature below its glass transition temperature, its molecules are substantially immobilized and thus less prone to reactions. Likewise, when a crystalline material is maintained at a temperature below its phase transition temperature, its molecules are substantially immobilized and thus less prone to reactions. Accordingly, processing drug components at mild conditions, such as the deposition and sintering conditions described herein, minimizes cross-reactions and degradation of the drug component. One type of reaction that is minimized by the processes of the invention relates to the ability to avoid conventional solvents which in turn minimizes-oxidation of drug, whether in amorphous, semi-crystalline, or crystalline form, by reducing exposure thereof to free radicals, residual solvents, protic materials, polar-protic materials, oxidation initiators, and autoxidation initiators.
“Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions” or “RESS” as used herein involves the dissolution of a polymer into a compressed fluid, typically a supercritical fluid, followed by rapid expansion into a chamber at lower pressure, typically near atmospheric conditions. The rapid expansion of the supercritical fluid solution through a small opening, with its accompanying decrease in density, reduces the dissolution capacity of the fluid and results in the nucleation and growth of polymer particles. The atmosphere of the chamber is maintained in an electrically neutral state by maintaining an isolating “cloud” of gas in the chamber.
Carbon dioxide, nitrogen, argon, helium, or other appropriate gas is employed to prevent electrical charge is transferred from the substrate to the surrounding environment.
“Electrostatic Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions” or “e-RESS” or “eRESS” as used herein refers to Electrostatic Capture as described herein combined with Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions as described herein. In some embodiments, Electrostatic Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions refers to Electrostatic capture as described in the art, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,756,084, “Electrostatic deposition of particles generated from rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions,” incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
“Solution Enhanced Dispersion of Supercritical Solutions” or “SEDS” as used herein involves a spray process for the generation of polymer particles, which are formed when a compressed fluid (e.g. supercritical fluid, preferably supercritical CO2) is used as a diluent to a vehicle in which a polymer is dissolved (one that can dissolve both the polymer and the compressed fluid). The mixing of the compressed fluid diluent with the polymer-containing solution may be achieved by encounter of a first stream containing the polymer solution and a second stream containing the diluent compressed fluid, for example, within one spray nozzle or by the use of multiple spray nozzles. The solvent in the polymer solution may be one compound or a mixture of two or more ingredients and may be or comprise an alcohol (including diols, triols, etc.), ether, amine, ketone, carbonate, or alkanes, or hydrocarbon (aliphatic or aromatic) or may be a mixture of compounds, such as mixtures of alkanes, or mixtures of one or more alkanes in combination with additional compounds such as one or more alcohols, (e.g., from 0 or 0.1 to 5% of a Ci to Ci5 alcohol, including diols, triols, etc.). See for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,669,785, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The solvent may optionally contain a surfactant, as also described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,669,785.
In one embodiment of the SEDS process, a first stream of fluid comprising a polymer dissolved in a common solvent is co-sprayed with a second stream of compressed fluid. Polymer particles are produced as the second stream acts as a diluent that weakens the solvent in the polymer solution of the first stream. The now combined streams of fluid, along with the polymer particles, flow out of the nozzle assembly into a collection vessel. Control of particle size, particle size distribution, and morphology is achieved by tailoring the following process variables: temperature, pressure, solvent composition of the first stream, flow-rate of the first stream, flow-rate of the second stream, composition of the second stream (where soluble additives may be added to the compressed gas), and conditions of the capture vessel. Typically the capture vessel contains a fluid phase that is at least five to ten times (5-1O×) atmospheric pressure.
“Electrostatic Dry Powder Coating” or “e-DPC” or “eDPC” as used herein refers to Electrostatic Capture as described herein combined with Dry Powder Coating. e-DPC deposits material (including, for example, polymer or impermeable dispersed solid) on the device or other substrate as dry powder, using electrostatic capture to attract the powder particles to the substrate. Dry powder spraying (“Dry Powder Coating” or “DPC”) is well known in the art, and dry powder spraying coupled with electrostatic capture has been described, for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,470,603, 6,319,541, and 6,372,246, all incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Methods for depositing coatings are described, e.g., in WO 2008/148013, “Polymer Films for Medical Device Coating,” incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
“Dipping Process” and “Spraying Process” as used herein refer to methods of coating substrates that have been described at length in the art. These processes can be used for coating medical devices with pharmaceutical agents. Spray coating, described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,696, “Medical devices for delivering a therapeutic agent and method of preparation” and elsewhere herein, can involve spraying or airbrushing a thin layer of solubilized coating or dry powder coating onto a substrate. Dip coating involves, e.g., dipping a substrate in a liquid, and then removing and drying it. Dip coating is described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,313 “Drug release stent coating process,” incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
“Bulk properties” properties of a coating including a pharmaceutical or a biological agent that can be enhanced through the methods of the invention include for example: adhesion, smoothness, conformality, thickness, and compositional mixing.
“Electrostatically charged” or “electrical potential” or “electrostatic capture” as used herein refers to the collection of the spray-produced particles upon a substrate that has a different electrostatic potential than the sprayed particles. Thus, the substrate is at an attractive electronic potential with respect to the particles exiting, which results in the capture of the particles upon the substrate, i.e. the substrate and particles are oppositely charged, and the particles transport through the gaseous medium of the capture vessel onto the surface of the substrate is enhanced via electrostatic attraction. This may be achieved by charging the particles and grounding the substrate or conversely charging the substrate and grounding the particles, by charging the particles at one potential (e.g. negative charge) and charging the substrate at an opposited potential (e.g. positive charge), or by some other process, which would be easily envisaged by one of skill in the art of electrostatic capture.
“Depositing the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without electrically charging the substrate” as used herein refers to any of these processes as performed without intentionally electrically charging the substrate. It is understood that the substrate might become electrically charged unintentially during any of these processes.
“Depositing the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without creating an electrical potential between the substrate and a coating apparatus” as used herein refers to any of these processes as performed without intentionally generating an electrical potential between the substrate and the coating apparatus. It is understood that electrical potential between the substrate and the coating apparatus might be generated unintentially during any of these processes.
“Intimate mixture” as used herein, refers to two or more materials, compounds, or substances that are uniformly distributed or dispersed together.
“Layer” as used herein refers to a material covering a surface or forming an overlying part or segment. Two different layers may have overlapping portions whereby material from one layer may be in contact with material from another layer. Contact between materials of different layers can be measured by determining a distance between the materials. For example, Raman spectroscopy may be employed in identifying materials from two layers present in close proximity to each other.
While layers defined by uniform thickness and/or regular shape are contemplated herein, several embodiments described herein relate to layers having varying thickness and/or irregular shape. Material of one layer may extend into the space largely occupied by material of another layer. For example, in a coating having three layers formed in sequence as a first polymer layer, a pharmaceutical agent layer and a second polymer layer, material from the second polymer layer which is deposited last in this sequence may extend into the space largely occupied by material of the pharmaceutical agent layer whereby material from the second polymer layer may have contact with material from the pharmaceutical layer. It is also contemplated that material from the second polymer layer may extend through the entire layer largely occupied by pharmaceutical agent and contact material from the first polymer layer.
It should be noted however that contact between material from the second polymer layer (or the first polymer layer) and material from the pharmaceutical agent layer (e.g.; a pharmaceutical agent crystal particle or a portion thereof) does not necessarily imply formation of a mixture between the material from the first or second polymer layers and material from the pharmaceutical agent layer. In some embodiments, a layer may be defined by the physical three-dimensional space occupied by crystalline particles of a pharmaceutical agent (and/or biological agent). It is contemplated that such layer may or may not be continuous as physical space occupied by the crystal particles of pharmaceutical agents may be interrupted, for example, by polymer material from an adjacent polymer layer. An adjacent polymer layer may be a layer that is in physical proximity to be pharmaceutical agent particles in the pharmaceutical agent layer. Similarly, an adjacent layer may be the layer formed in a process step right before or right after the process step in which pharmaceutical agent particles are deposited to form the pharmaceutical agent layer.
As described herein, material deposition and layer formation provided herein are advantageous in that the pharmaceutical agent remains largely in crystalline form during the entire process. While the polymer particles and the pharmaceutical agent particles may be in contact, the layer formation process is controlled to avoid formation of a mixture between the pharmaceutical agent particles the polymer particles during formation of a coated device.
In some embodiments, the coating comprises a plurality of layers deposited on the substrate, wherein at least one of the layers comprises the active agent. In some embodiments, at least one of the layers comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the polymer is bioabsorbable. In some embodiments, the active agent and the polymer are in the same layer, in separate layers, or form overlapping layers. In some embodiments, the plurality of layers comprise five layers deposited as follows: a first polymer layer, a first active agent layer, a second polymer layer, a second active agent layer and a third polymer layer.
In some embodiments of the methods and/or devices provided herein, the coating comprises a plurality of layers deposited on the substrate, wherein at least one of the layers comprises the active agent. In some embodiments, at least one of the layers comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the polymer is bioabsorbable. In some embodiments, the active agent and the polymer are in the same layer, in separate layers, or form overlapping layers. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a plurality of layers deposited on the substrate, wherein at least one of the layers comprises the pharmaceutical agent. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical agent and the polymer are in the same layer, in separate layers, or form overlapping layers. In some embodiments, the plurality of layers comprise five layers deposited as follows: a first polymer layer, a first active agent layer, a second polymer layer, a second active agent layer and a third polymer layer. In some embodiments, the plurality of layers comprise five layers deposited as follows: a first polymer layer, a first pharmaceutical agent layer, a second polymer layer, a second pharmaceutical agent layer and a third polymer layer. In some embodiments, the plurality of layers comprise five layers deposited as follows: a first polymer layer, a first active biological agent layer, a second polymer layer, a second active biological agent layer and a third polymer layer.
In some embodiments, the device provides the coating to the intervention site over an area of delivery greater than the outer surface contact area of the substrate. In some embodiments, the area of delivery is at least 110% greater than the outer surface contact area of the substrate. In some embodiments, the area of delivery is at least 110% to 200% greater than the outer surface contact area of the substrate. In some embodiments, the area of delivery is at least 200% greater than the outer surface contact area of the substrate.
“Laminate coating” as used herein refers to a coating made up of two or more layers of material. Means for creating a laminate coating as described herein (e.g.; a laminate coating comprising bioabsorbable polymer(s) and pharmaceutical agent) may include coating the stent with drug and polymer as described herein (e-RESS, e-DPC, compressed-gas sintering). The process comprises performing multiple and sequential coating steps (with sintering steps for polymer materials) wherein different materials may be deposited in each step, thus creating a laminated structure with a multitude of layers (at least 2 layers) including polymer layers and pharmaceutical agent layers to build the final device (e.g.; laminate coated stent).
“Portion of the coating” and “portion of the active agent” as used herein refer to an amount or percentage of the coating or active agent that is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the substrate to the intervention site, either at a designated point in delivery, during a certain period of delivery, or in total throughout the entire delivery process. In embodiments, the device and methods of the invention are adapted to free, dissociate, and/or transfer a certain amount of the coating and/or active agent.
For example, in embodiments, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating is adapted to be freed, dissociated, and/or to be transferred from the substrate to the intervention site. In embodiments, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the active agent is adapted to be freed, dissociated, and/or to be transferred from the substrate to the intervention site.
The portion of the coating and/or that is freed, dissociated, or transferred from the device substrate is influenced by any or a combination of, e.g., the size, shape, and flexibility of the device substrate, the size, shape, surface qualities of and conditions (e.g., blood or lymph circulation, temperature, etc.) at the intervention site, the composition of the coating, including the particular active agent(s) and specific polymer component(s) used in the coating, the relative proportions of these components, the use of any release agent(s), and substrate characteristics. Any one or more of these and other aspects of the device and methods of the invention can be adapted to influence the portion of the coating and/or active agent freed, dissociated, and/or transferred, as desired to produce the desired clinical outcome.
“Substantially all of the coating” as used herein refers to at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 97%, and/or at least about 99% percent of the coating that was present on the device prior to use.
“At least a portion of the substrate” as used herein refers to an amount and/or percentage of the substrate. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein a coating is on “at least a portion of the substrate,” at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the substrate is coated. In embodiments wherein “at least a portion of the substrate” is bioabsorbable, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the substrate is bioabsorbable.
“Transferring at least a portion” as used herein in the context of transferring a coating or active agent from the substrate to an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of the coating or active agent that is transferred from the substrate to an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating or active agent is transferred from the substrate to an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating or active agent is transferred from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 10% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 20% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 30% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 50% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 75% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 85% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 90% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 95% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 99% of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the coating can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the coating transferred, or as a variation of the percentage of the coating transferred).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that is adapted to transfer upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, the stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, device is adapted to transfer less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulation of the coating.
In some embodiments, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 10% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 20% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 30% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 50% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 75% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 85% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 90% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 95% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, at least about 99% of the active agent is adapted to transfer from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the active agent can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the active agent transferred, or as a variation of the percentage of the active agent transferred).
In some embodiments, the active agent portion that is adapted to transfer upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an abluminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, the stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the active agent absent stimulation of the coating.
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 10% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 20% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 30% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 50% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 75% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 85% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 90% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 95% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the coating can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the coating transferred, or as a variation of the percentage of the coating transferred).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that transfers upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulation of the coating.
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 10% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 20% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 30% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 50% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 75% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 85% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 90% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 95% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer at least about 99% of the active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the active agent can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the active agent transferred, or as a variation of the percentage of the active agent transferred).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that transfers upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, the stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to transfer less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, less than about 90% of the active agent absent stimulation of the coating.
“Freeing at least a portion” as used herein in the context of freeing a coating and/or active agent from the substrate at an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of a coating or active agent that is freed from the substrate at an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating or active agent is freed from the substrate at an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating or active agent is freed from the substrate at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 10% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 20% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 30% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 50% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 75% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 85% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 90% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 95% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the coating can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the coating freed, or as a variation of the percentage of the coating freed).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that frees upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate.
In some embodiments, the stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulation of the coating.
“Dissociating at least a portion” as used herein in the context of dissociating a coating and/or active agent from the substrate at an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of a coating and/or active agent that is dissociated from the substrate at an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating and/or active agent is dissociated from the substrate at an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating and/or active agent is dissociated from the substrate at the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 10% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 20% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 30% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 50% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 75% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 85% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 90% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 95% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the coating can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the coating dissociated, or as a variation of the percentage of the coating dissociated).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that dissociates upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulation of the coating.
“Depositing at least a portion” as used herein in the context of a coating and/or active agent at an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of a coating and/or active agent that is deposited at an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating and/or active agent is deposited at an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating and/or active agent is deposited at the intervention site. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, depositing deposits less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate.
“Delivering at least a portion” as used herein in the context of a coating and/or active agent at an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of a coating and/or active agent that is delivered to an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating and/or active agent is delivered to an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating and/or active agent is delivered to the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 10% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 20% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 30% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 50% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 75% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 85% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 90% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 95% of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver at least about 99% of the coating to the intervention site. As used herein, “about” when used in reference to a percentage of the coating can mean ranges of 1%-5%, of 5%-10%, of 10%-20%, and/or of 10%-50% (as a percent of the percentage of the coating delivered, or as a variation of the percentage of the coating delivered).
In some embodiments, the coating portion that is delivered upon stimulation is on at least one of a distal surface of the substrate, a middle surface of the substrate, a proximal surface of the substrate, and an ab luminal surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, the stimulation decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device is adapted to deliver less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulation of the coating.
In some embodiments, depositing at least a portion of the coating comprises depositing at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating at the intervention site. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, depositing deposits less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate.
“Tacking at least a portion” as used herein in the context of tacking at least a portion of the coating to an intervention site refers to an amount and/or percentage of a coating and/or active agent that is tacked at an intervention site. In embodiments of the device and methods of the invention wherein at least a portion of a coating and/or active agent is tacked at an intervention site, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating and/or active agent is tacked at the intervention site. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, tacking tacks less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the device comprises a tacking element that cooperates with the stimulation to tack the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the device comprises a tacking element that tacks the coating to the substrate until stimulating with a stimulation.
“Adhere,” “adherence,” “adhered,” “cohere,” “coherence,” “cohered,” and related terms, as used herein in the context of adherence or coherence of the substrate to the coating refer to an interaction between the substrate and the coating that is sufficiently strong to maintain the association of the coating with the substrate for an amount of time prior to the stimulation, e.g., mechanical, chemical, thermal, electromagnetic, or sonic stimulation, that is intended to cause the coating to be freed, dissociated, and/or transferred. These same terms, as used in the context of an interaction between the coating and the target tissue area and/or intervention site refer to an interaction between the coating and the target tissue area and/or intervention site that is sufficient to keep the coating associated with the target tissue area and/or intervention site for an amount of time as desired for treatment, e.g., at least about 12 hours, about 1 day, about 3 days, about 5 days, about 7 days, about 14 days, about 3 weeks, about 4 weeks, about 45 days, about 60 days, about 90 days, about 180 days, about 6 months, about 9 months, about 1 year, about 1 to about 2 days, about 1 to about 5 days, about 1 to about 2 weeks, about 2 to about 4 weeks, about 45 to about 60 days, about 45 to about 90 days, about 30 to about 90 days, about 60 to about 90 days, about 90 to about 180 days, about 60 to about 180 days, about 180 to about 365 days, about 6 months to about 9 months, about 9 months to about 12 months, about 9 months to about 15 months, and about 1 year to about 2 years.
“Balloon” as used herein refers to a flexible sac that can be inflated within a natural or non-natural body lumen or cavity, or used to create a cavity, or used to enlarge an existing cavity. The balloon can be used transiently to dilate a lumen or cavity and thereafter may be deflated and/or removed from the subject during the medical procedure or thereafter. In embodiments, the balloon can be expanded within the body and has a coating thereon that is freed (at least in part) from the balloon and left behind in the lumen or cavity when the balloon is removed. A coating can be applied to a balloon either after the balloon has been compacted for insertion, resulting in a coating that partially covers the surface of the balloon, or it can be applied prior to or during compaction. In embodiments, a coating is applied to the balloon both prior to and after compaction of the balloon. In embodiments, the balloon is compacted by, e.g., crimping or folding. Methods of compacting balloons have been described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,308,748, “Method for compressing an intraluminal device,” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,152,452, “Assembly for crimping an intraluminal device and method of use,” relating to uniformly crimping a balloon onto a catheter or other intraluminal device, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,361 “Tri-fold balloon for dilatation catheter and related method,” relating to balloon folding methods and devices, all incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In some embodiments the balloon is delivered to the intervention site by a delivery device. In some embodiments, the delivery device comprises catheter. In some embodiments, the balloon is an angioplasty balloon. Balloons can be delivered, removed, and visualized during delivery and removal by methods known in the art, e.g., for inserting angioplasty balloons, stents, and other medical devices. Methods for visualizing a treatment area and planning instrument insertion are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,171,255, “Virtual reality 3D visualization for surgical procedures” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,013, “3D ultrasound-guided intraoperative prostate brachytherapy,” incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
“Compliant balloon” as used herein refers to a balloon which conforms to the intervention site relatively more than a semi-compliant balloon and still more so than a non-compliant balloon. Compliant balloons expand and stretch with increasing pressure within the balloon, and are made from such materials as polyethylene or polyolefm copolymers. There is in the art a general classification of balloons based on their expandability or “compliance” relative to each other, as described e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,383, “Block copolymer elastomer catheter balloons.” Generally, “non-compliant” balloons are the least elastic, increasing in diameter about 2-7%, typically about 5%, as the balloon is pressurized from an inflation pressure of about 6 atm to a pressure of about 12 atm, that is, they have a “distension” over that pressure range of about 5%. “Semi-compliant” balloons have somewhat greater distensions, generally 7-16% and typically 10-12% over the same pressurization range. “Compliant” balloons are still more distensible, having distensions generally in the range of 16-40% and typically about 21% over the same pressure range. Maximum distensions, i.e. distension from nominal diameter to burst, of various balloon materials may be significantly higher than the distension percentages discussed above because wall strengths, and thus burst pressures, vary widely between balloon materials. These distension ranges are intended to provide general guidance, as one of skill in the art will be aware that the compliance of a balloon is dependent on the dimensions and/or characteristics of the cavity and/or lumen walls, not only the expandability of the balloon.
A compliant balloon may be used in the vasculature of a subject. A compliant balloon might also be used in any tube or hole outside the vasculature (whether naturally occurring or or man-made, or created during an injury). For a non-limiting example, a compliant balloon might be used in a lumpectomy to put a coating at the site where a tumor was removed, to: treat an abscess, treat an infection, prevent an infection, aid healing, promote healing, or for a combination of any of these purposes. The coating in this embodiment may comprise a growth factor.
“Non-Compliant balloon” as used herein refers to a balloon that does not conform to the intervention site, but rather, tends to cause the intervention site to conform to the balloon shape. Non-compliant balloons, commonly made from such materials as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polyamides, remain at a preselected diameter as the internal balloon pressure increases beyond that required to fully inflate the balloon. Non-compliant balloons are often used to dilate spaces, e.g., vascular lumens. As noted with respect to a compliant balloon, one of skill in the art will be aware that the compliance of a balloon is dependent on the dimensions and/or characteristics of the cavity and/or lumen walls, not only the expandability of the balloon.
“Cutting balloon” as used herein refers to a balloon commonly used in angioplasty having a special balloon tip with cutting elements, e.g., small blades, wires, etc. The cutting elements can be activated when the balloon is inflated. In angioplasty procedures, small blades can be used score the plaque and the balloon used to compress the fatty matter against the vessel wall. A cutting balloon might have tacks or other wire elements which in some embodiments aid in freeing the coating from the balloon, and in some embodiments, may promote adherence or partial adherence of the coating to the target tissue area, or some combination thereof. In some embodiments, the cutting balloon cutting elements also score the target tissue to promote the coating's introduction into the target tissue. In some embodiments, the cutting elements do not cut tissue at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the cutting balloon comprises tacking elements as the cutting elements.
“Inflation pressure” as used herein refers to the pressure at which a balloon is inflated. As used herein the nominal inflation pressure refers to the pressure at which a balloon is inflated in order to achieve a particular balloon dimension, usually a diameter of the balloon as designed. The “rated burst pressure” or “RBP” as used herein refers to the maximum statistically guaranteed pressure to which a balloon can be inflated without failing. For PTCA and PTA catheters, the rated burst pressure is based on the results of in vitro testing ot the PTCA and/or PTA catheters, and normally means that at least 99.9% of the balloons tested (with 95% confidence) will not burst at or below this pressure.
“Tacking element” as used herein refers to an element on the substrate surface that is used to influence transfer of the coating to the intervention site. For example, the tacking element can comprise a projection, e.g., a bump or a spike, on the surface of the substrate. In embodiments, the tacking element is adapted to secure the coating to the cutting balloon until inflation of the cutting balloon. In some embodiments, tacking element can comprise a wire, and the wire can be shaped in the form of an outward pointing wedge. In certain embodiments, the tacking element does not cut tissue at the intervention site.
As used herein, a “surgical tool” refers to any tool used in a surgical procedure. Examples of surgical tools include, but are not limited to: As used herein, a “surgical tool” refers to any tool used in a surgical procedure. Examples of surgical tools include, but are not limited to: a knife, a scalpel, a guidewire, a guiding catheter, a introduction catheter, a distracter, a needle, a syringe, a biopsy device, an articulator, a Galotti articulator, a bone chisel, a bone crusher, a cottle cartilage crusher, a bone cutter, a bone distractor, an Ilizarov apparatus, an intramedullary kinetic bone distractor, a bone drill, a bone extender, a bone file, a bone lever, a bone mallet, a bone rasp, a bone saw, a bone skid, a bone splint, a bone button, a caliper, a cannula, a catheter, a cautery, a clamp, a coagulator, a curette, a depressor, a dilator, a dissecting knife, a distractor, a dermatome, forceps, dissecting forceps, tissue forceps, sponge forceps, bone forceps, Carmalt forceps, Cushing forceps, Dandy forceps, DeBakey forceps, Doyen intestinal forceps, epilation forceps, Halstead forceps, Kelly forceps, Kocher forceps, mosquito forceps, a hemostat, a hook, a nerve hook, an obstetrical hook, a skin hook, a hypodermic needle, a lancet, a luxator, a lythotome, a lythotript, a mallet, a partsch mallet, a mouth prop, a mouth gag, a mammotome, a needle holder, an occluder, an osteotome, an Epker osteotome, a periosteal elevator, a Joseph elevator, a Molt periosteal elevator, an Obweg periosteal elevator, a septum elevator, a Tessier periosteal elevator, a probe, a retractor, a Senn retractor, a Gelpi retractor, a Weitlaner retractor, a USA-Army/Navy retractor, an O'Connor-O'Sullivan retractor, a Deaver retractor, a Bookwalter retractor, a Sweetheart retractor, a Joseph skin hook, a Lahey retractor, a Blair (Rollet) retractor, a rigid rake retractor, a flexible rake retractor, a Ragnell retractor, a Linde-Ragnell retractor, a Davis retractor, a Volkman retractor, a Mathieu retractor, a Jackson tracheal hook, a Crile retractor, a Meyerding finger retractor, a Little retractor, a Love Nerve retractor, a Green retractor, a Goelet retractor, a Cushing vein retractor, a Langenbeck retractor, a Richardson retractor, a Richardson-Eastmann retractor, a Kelly retractor, a Parker retractor, a Parker-Mott retractor, a Roux retractor, a Mayo-Collins retractor, a Ribbon retractor, an Aim retractor, a self-retaining retractor, a Weitlaner retractor, a Beckman-Weitlaner retractor, a Beckman-Eaton retractor, a Beckman retractor, an Adson retractor, a rib spreader, a rongeur, a scalpel, an ultrasonic scalpel, a laser scalpel, scissors, iris scissors, Kiene scissors, Metzenbaum scissors, Mayo scissors, Tenotomy scissors, a spatula, a speculum, a mouth speculum, a rectal speculum, Sim's vaginal speculum, Cusco's vaginal speculum, a sternal saw, a suction tube, a surgical elevator, a surgical hook, a surgical knife, surgical mesh, a surgical needle, a surgical snare, a surgical sponge, a surgical spoon, a surgical stapler, a suture, a syringe, a tongue depressor, a tonsillotome, a tooth extractor, a towel clamp, towel forceps, Backhaus towel forceps, Lorna towel forceps, a tracheotome, a tissue expander, a subcutaneus inflatable balloon expander, a trephine, a trocar, tweezers, and a venous cliping. In some embodiments, a surgical tool may also and/or alternatively be referred to as a tool for performing a medical procedure. In some embodiments, a surgical tool may also and/or alternatively be a tool for delivering to the intervention site a biomedical implant.
“Stimulation” as used herein refers to any mechanical stimulation, chemical stimulation, thermal stimulation, electromagnetic stimulation, and/or sonic stimulation that influences, causes, initiates, and/or results in the freeing, dissociation, and/or the transfer of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate.
“Mechanical Stimulation” as used herein refers to use of a mechanical force that influences the freeing, dissociation, and/or transfer of the coating and/or the active agent from the substrate. For example, mechanical stimulation can comprise a shearing force, a compressive force, a force exerted on the coating from a substrate side of the coating, a force exerted on the coating by the substrate, a force exerted on the coating by an external element, a translation, a rotation, a vibration, or a combination thereof. In embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises balloon expansion, stent expansion, etc. In embodiments, the mechanical stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the mechanical stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the mechanical stimulation can be adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, an external element is a part of the subject. In embodiments, the external element is not part of the device. In embodiments the external element comprises a liquid, e.g., saline or water. In certain embodiments the liquid is forced between the coating and the substrate. In embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises a geometric configuration of the substrate that maximizes a shear force on the coating.
“Chemical Stimulation” as used herein refers to use of a chemical force to influence the freeing, dissociation, and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. For example, chemical stimulation can comprise bulk degradation, interaction with a bodily fluid, interaction with a bodily tissue, a chemical interaction with a non-bodily fluid, a chemical interaction with a chemical, an acid-base reaction, an enzymatic reaction, hydrolysis, or a combination thereof. In embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the chemical stimulation is achieved through the use of a coating that comprises a material that is adapted to transfer, free, and/or dissociate from the substrate when at the intervention site in response to an in-situ enzymatic reaction resulting in a weak bond between the coating and the substrate.
“Thermal Stimulation” as used herein refers to use of a thermal stimulus to influence the freeing, dissociation, and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. For example, thermal stimulation can comprise at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus. In embodiments, thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate.
“Electromagnetic Stimulation” as used herein refers to use of an electromagnetic stimulus to influence the freeing, dissociation, and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. For example, the electromagnetic stimulation is an electromagnetic wave comprising at least one of, e.g., a radio wave, a micro wave, a infrared wave, near infrared wave, a visible light wave, an ultraviolet wave, a X-ray wave, and a gamma wave. In embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate.
“Sonic Stimulation” as used herein refers to use of a sonic stimulus to influence the freeing, dissociation, and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. For example, sonic stimulation can comprise a sound wave, wherein the sound wave is at least one of an ultrasound wave, an acoustic sound wave, and an infrasound wave. In embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate. In embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transfer of the coating from the substrate.
“Release Agent” as used herein refers to a substance or substrate structure that influences the ease, rate, or extent, of release of the coating from the substrate. In certain embodiments wherein the device is adapted to transfer a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate to the intervention site, the device can be so adapted by, e.g., substrate attributes and/or surface modification of the substrate (for non-limiting example: substrate composition, substrate materials, substrate shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture), the delivery system of the substrate and coating (for non-limiting example: control over the substrate, control over the coating using the delivery system, the type of delivery system provided, the materials of the delivery system, and/or combinations thereof), coating attributes and/or physical characteristics of the coating (for non-limiting example: selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute), release agent attributes (for non-limiting example: through the selection a particular release agent and/or the manner in which the release agent is employed to transfer the coating and/or the active agent, and/or the amount of the release agent used), and/or a combination thereof. Release agents may include biocompatible release agents, non-biocompatible release agents to aggravate and/or otherwise induce a healing response or induce inflammation, powder release agents, lubricants (e.g. ePTFE, sugars, other known lubricants), micronized drugs as the release agent (to create a burst layer after the coating is freed from the substrate, physical release agents (patterning of the substrate to free the coating, others), and/or agents that change properties upon insertion (e.g. gels, lipid films, vitamin E, oil, mucosal adhesives, adherent hydrogels, etc.). Methods of patterning a substrate are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,537,610, “Method and system for creating a textured surface on an implantable medical device.” In embodiments, more than one release agent is used, for example, the substrate can be patterned and also lubricated. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a viscous fluid.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a viscous fluid. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid comprises oil. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to water. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to blood. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to urine. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to bile. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to synovial fluid. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to saline. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to a bodily fluid at the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a physical characteristic of the substrate. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic of the substrate comprises at least one of a patterned coating surface and a ribbed coating surface. In some embodiments, the patterned coating surface comprises a stent framework. In some embodiments, the ribbed coating surface comprises an undulating substrate surface. In some embodiments, the ribbed coating surface comprises an substrate surface having bumps thereon.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a physical characteristic of the coating. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic of the coating comprises a pattern. In some embodiments, the pattern is a textured surface on the substrate side of the coating, wherein the substrate side of the coating is the part of the coating on the substrate. In some embodiments, the pattern is a textured surface on the intervention site side of the coating, wherein the intervention site side of the coating is the part of the coating that is transferred to, and/or delivered to, and/or deposited at the intervention site.
“Extrusion” and/or “Extruded” and/or to “Extrude” as used herein refers to the movement of a substance away from another substance or object, especially upon stimulation, e.g., by a mechanical force. For example, in embodiments of the invention, the coating is extruded from the substrate.
Provided herein is a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, wherein the coating is patterned, and wherein at least a portion of the coating is adapted to free from the substrate upon stimulation of the coating.
Provided herein is a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, wherein the coating is patterned, and wherein at least a portion of the coating is adapted to dissociate from the substrate upon stimulation of the coating.
Provided herein is a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, wherein the coating is patterned, and wherein at least a portion of the coating is adapted to transfer from the substrate to an intervention site upon stimulation of the coating.
In some embodiments, the patterned coating comprises at least two different shapes.
“Patterned” as used herein in reference to the coating refers to a coating having at least two different shapes. The shapes can be formed by various methods, including for example, etching, masking, electrostatic capture, and/or by the coating methods described herein. For example the coating may have voids that are at least partially through the thickness of the coating. In some embodiments, the voids extend fully through the coating. The voids may be in a regular configuration, or irregular in shape. The voids may form a repeating configuration to form the patterned coating. The voids may have been removed from a smooth or solid coating to form a patterned coating. The coating may in some embodiments be patterned by having a surface that is ribbed, wavy or bumpy. The coating may in some embodiments be patterned by having been cut and/or etched from a coating sheath and/or sheet in a particular design. The sheath and/or sheet in such embodiments may have been formed using the coating methods for manufacture as described herein. The pattern design may be chosen to improve the freeing, transfer, and/or dissociation from the substrate. The pattern design may be chosen to improve the transfer and/or delivery to the intervention site.
Patterned coatings may be created using the methods and processes described herein, for non-limiting example, by providing a substrate having a patterned design thereon comprising, for example, a material that is chosen to selectively capture the coating particles (whether active agent, polymer, or other coating particles) to coat only a desired portion of the substrate. This portion that is coated may be the patterned design of the substrate.
The term “image enhanced polymer” or “imaging agent” as used herein refer to an agent that can be used with the devices and methods of the invention to view at least one component of the coating, either while the coating is on the substrate or after it is freed, dissociated and/or transferred. In embodiments, an image enhanced polymer serves as a tracer, allowing the movement or location of the coated device to be identified, e.g., using an imaging system. In other embodiments, an image enhanced polymer allows the practitioner to monitor the delivery and movement of a coating component. In embodiments, use of an image enhanced polymer enables the practitioner to determine the dose of a component of the coating (e.g., the active agent) that is freed, dissociated and/or transferred. Information provided by the image enhanced polymer or imaging agent about the amount of coating transferred to the intervention site can allow the practitioner to determine the rate at which the coating will be released, thereby allowing prediction of dosing over time. Imaging agents may comprise barium compounds such as, for non-limiting example, barium sulfate. Imaging agents may comprise iodine compounds. Imaging agents may comprise any compound that improves radiopacity.
In embodiments, an image enhanced polymer is used with the device and methods of the invention for a purpose including, but not limited to, one or more of the following: monitoring the location of the substrate, e.g., a balloon or other device; assessing physiological parameters, e.g., flow and perfusion; and targeting to a specific molecule. In embodiments, “smart” agents that activate only in the presence of their intended target are used with the device and methods of the invention.
Provided herein is a method comprising: providing a medical device, wherein the medical device comprises a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent; and tacking at least a portion of the coating to an intervention site. In some embodiments, the tacking the coating portion (i.e. the portion of the coating) to the intervention site is upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a balloon. In some embodiments, the portion of the balloon having coating thereon comprises an outer surface of the balloon. In some embodiments, the outer surface is a surface of the balloon exposed to a coating prior to balloon folding. In some embodiments, the outer surface is a surface of the balloon exposed to a coating following balloon folding. In some embodiments, the outer surface is a surface of the balloon exposed to a coating following balloon crimping. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation at pressures provided by inflation of the balloon. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation at a pressure that is less than the rated burst pressure of the balloon.
In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation at a pressure that is less than the nominal inflation pressure of the balloon. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation with at least 8 ATM of pressure. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation with at least 6 ATM of pressure. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation with at least 4 ATM of pressure. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that undergoes plastic deformation with at least 2 ATM of pressure.
In some embodiments, the balloon is a compliant balloon. In some embodiments, the balloon is a semi-compliant balloon. In some embodiments, the balloon is a non-compliant balloon. In some embodiments, the balloon conforms to a shape of the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the balloon comprises a cylindrical portion. In some embodiments, the balloon comprises a substantially spherical portion. In some embodiments, the balloon comprises a complex shape. In some embodiments, the complex shape comprises at least one of a double noded shape, a triple noded shape, a waisted shape, an hourglass shape, and a ribbed shape.
Some embodiments provide devices that can serve interventional purposes in addition to delivery of therapeutics, such as a cutting balloon. In some embodiments, such as in
One illustration devices provided herein include a cutting balloon 11 for the treatment of vascular disease (e.g.; occluded lesions in the coronary or peripheral vasculature). In this embodiment, the coating 13 may be preferentially located on the ‘cutting wire’ portion of the device. Upon deployment, the wire 12 pushes into the plaque to provide the desired therapeutic ‘cutting’ action. During this cutting, the polymer and drug coating is plastically deformed off of the wire by the combination of compressive and shear forces acting on the wire—leaving some or all of the coating embedded in the plaque and/or artery wall. A similar approach may be applied to delivery of oncology drugs (a) directly to tumors and/or, (b) to the arteries delivering blood to the tumors for site-specific chemotherapy, and/or (c) to the voids left after the removal of a tumor (lumpectomy). These oncology (as well as other nonvascular) applications may not require the ‘cutting’ aspects and could be provided by coatings directly onto the balloon or onto a sheath over the balloon or according to an embodiment wherein the coating forms a sheath over the deflated (pleated) balloon.
A cutting balloon embodiment described herein provides several advantages. Such embodiment allows for concentrating the mechanical force on the coating/wire as the balloon is inflated—the wire may serve to concentrate the point-of-contact-area of the balloon expansion pressure resulting in a much higher force for plastic deformation of the drug and polymer coating vs. the non-cutting plain balloon which may distribute the pressure over a much larger area (therefore lower force proportional to the ratio of the areas). Embodiments involving a cutting balloon provide for the use of polymers that would otherwise be too rigid (higher modulus) to deform from a non-cutting balloon. Other embodiments provided herein are based on geometric configurations of the device that optimize both the deformation and the bulk-migration of the coating from the device. In one embodiment wherein the device is a cutting balloon, the (coated) wire of the cutting balloon is shaped like a wedge, pointed outward.
Another embodiment provides catheter-based devices where the drug-delivery formulation is delivered to the therapeutic site in the vasculature via inflation of a balloon.
One embodiment provides coated percutaneous devices (e.g.; balloons, whether cutting balloons or other balloon types) that, upon deployment at a specific site in the patient, transfer some or all of the drug-delivery formulation (5-10%, 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-90%, 90-99%, 99-100%) to the site of therapeutic demand. In certain embodiments, the balloon is at least in part cylindrical as expanded or as formed. In certain embodiments, the balloon is at least in part bulbous as expanded or as formed. In certain embodiments, the balloon is at least in part spherical as expanded or as formed. In certain embodiments, the balloon has a complex shape as expanded or as formed (such as a double noded shape, a triple noded shape, has a waist, and/or has an hourglass shape, for non-limiting example).
In some embodiments, transferring at least a portion of the active agent comprises transferring at least about 3%, at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, greater than 35%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the active agent from the substrate. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, transferring transfers less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, at most about 35%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the active agent absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate.
The term “adapted to transfer at least a portion” of the coating or active agent to an intervention site refers to a device that is designed to transfer any portion of the coating or active agent to an intervention site.
The term “adapted to free” a portion of a coating and/or active agent from the substrate refers to a device, coating, and/or substrate that is designed to free a certain percentage of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. As used herein, a device, coating, and/or substrate that is designed to free a certain percentage of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate is designed to unrestrain the coating and/or active agent from the substrate, and/or to remove any obstruction and/or connection the coating may have to the substrate (whether direct or indirect).
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example, the device is so adapted by substrate attributes (for non-limiting example: substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture), the delivery system of the substrate and coating (for non-limiting example: control over the substrate, control over the coating using the delivery system, the type of delivery system provided, the materials of the delivery system, and/or combinations thereof), coating attributes (for non-limiting example: selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute), release agent attributes (for non-limiting example: through the selection a particular release agent and/or how the release agent is employed to transfer the coating and/or the active agent, and/or how much of the release agent is used), and/or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the substrate is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example, the substrate is so adapted by selection of the substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture, and/or combinations thereof. For example, a balloon can be designed to only partially inflate within the confines of the intervention site. Partial inflation can prevent a designated portion of coating from being freed.
In some embodiments, the coating is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example the coating may be so adapted by selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute.
In some embodiments, the substrate is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. For non-limiting example, the substrate is so adapted by selection of the substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture, and/or combinations thereof. For example, a balloon can be designed to only partially inflate within the confines of the intervention site. Partial inflation can prevent a designated portion of coating from being freed.
In some embodiments, the coating is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. For non-limiting example the coating may be so adapted by selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute.
In some embodiments, freeing at least a portion of the coating comprises freeing at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, greater than 35%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, freeing frees less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, at most about 35%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate.
The term “adapted to dissociate” a portion of a coating and/or active agent from the substrate refers to a device, coating, and/or substrate that is designed to dissociate a certain percentage of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. As used herein, a device, coating, and/or substrate that is designed to dissociate a certain percentage of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate is designed to remove from association between the coating (and/or active agent) and the substrate. Also and/or alternatively, as used herein, a device, coating, and/or substrate that is designed to dissociate a certain percentage of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate is designed to separate the coating (and/or active agent) from the substrate. This separation may be reversible in some embodiments. This separation may not be reversible in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, the device is adapted to dissociate a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example, the device is so adapted by substrate attributes (for non-limiting example: substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture), the delivery system of the substrate and coating (for non-limiting example: control over the substrate, control over the coating using the delivery system, the type of delivery system provided, the materials of the delivery system, and/or combinations thereof), coating attributes (for non-limiting example: selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute), release agent attributes (for non-limiting example: through the selection a particular release agent and/or how the release agent is employed to transfer the coating and/or the active agent, and/or how much of the release agent is used), and/or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the substrate is adapted to dissociate a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example, the substrate is so adapted by selection of the substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture, and/or combinations thereof. For example, a balloon can be designed to only partially inflate within the confines of the intervention site. Partial inflation can prevent a designated portion of coating from being freed.
In some embodiments, the coating is adapted to dissociate a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate. For non-limiting example the coating may be so adapted by selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute.
In some embodiments, the substrate is adapted to free a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. For non-limiting example, the substrate is so adapted by selection of the substrate composition, substrate materials, shape, substrate deployment attributes, substrate delivery attributes, substrate pattern, and/or substrate texture, and/or combinations thereof. For example, a balloon can be designed to only partially inflate within the confines of the intervention site. Partial inflation can prevent a designated portion of coating from being freed.
In some embodiments, the coating is adapted to dissociate a portion of the coating and/or active agent from the substrate to the intervention site. For non-limiting example the coating may be so adapted by selection of the active agent and/or the polymer and/or the polymer-active agent composition, or by the coating having a particular pattern—e.g. a ribbed pattern, a textured surface, a smooth surface, and/or another pattern, coating thickness, coating layers, and/or another physical and/or compositional attribute.
In some embodiments, dissociating at least a portion of the coating comprises dissociating at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, greater than 35%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and/or at least about 99% of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, stimulating decreases the contact between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, dissociating dissociates less than about 1%, less than about 5%, less than about 10%. less than about 15%, less than about 25%, at most about 35%, less than about 50%, less than about 70%, less than about 80%, and/or less than about 90% of the coating absent stimulating at least one of the coating and the substrate.
“Plastic deformation” as used herein is the change in the physical shape of the coating by forces induced on the device. Plastic deformation results in increasing the contact area of the coating on the tissue and decreasing the contact area of the coating on the device. This change in contact area results in some or all of the coating being preferentially exposed to the tissue instead of the device. The terms “plastic deformation” and “plastically deform,” as used herein in the context of a coating, are intended to include the expansion of the coating material beyond the elastic limit of the material such that the material is permanently deformed. “Elastic deformation” as used herein refers to a reversible alteration of the form or dimensions of the object under stress or strain, e.g., inflation pressure of a balloon substrate. The terms “plastic deformation” and “plastically deform,” as used herein in the context of a balloon or other substrate, are intended to include the expansion of the substrate beyond the elastic limit of the substrate material such that the substrate material is permanently deformed. Once plastically deformed, a material becomes substantially inelastic and generally will not, on its own, return to its pre-expansion size and shape. “Residual plastic deformation” refers to a deformation capable of remaining at least partially after removal of the inflation stress, e.g., when the balloon is deflated. “Elastic deformation” as used herein refers to a reversible alteration of the form or dimensions of the object (whether it is the coating or the substrate) under stress or strain, e.g., inflation pressure.
“Shear transfer” as used herein is the force (or component of ferees) orthogonal to the device that would drive the coating away from the device substrate. This could be induced on the device by deployment, pressure-response from the surrounding tissue and/or ingrowth of tissue around the coating.
“Bulk migration” as used herein is the incorporation of the coating onto/into the tissue provided by the removal of the device and/or provided by degradation of the coating over time and/or provided by hydration of the coating over time. Degradation and hydration of the coating may reduce the coating's cohesive and adhesive binding to the device, thereby facilitating transfer of the coating to the tissue.
One embodiment may described by analogy to contact printing whereby a biochemically active ‘ink’ (the polymer+drug coating) from a ‘die’ (the device) to the ‘stock’ (the site in the body).
The devices and methods described in conjunction with some of the embodiments provided herein are advantageously based on specific properties provided for in the drug-delivery formulation. One such property, especially well-suited for non-permanent implants such as balloon catheters, cutting balloons, etc. is ‘soft’ coating that undergoes plastic deformation at pressures provided by the inflation of the balloon (range 2-25 ATM, typically 10-18 ATM). Another such property, especially well-suited to permanent implants such as stents is coatings where the polymer becomes ‘soft’ at some point after implant either by hydration or by degradation or by combinations of hydration and degradation.
Some embodiments provide devices that can advantageously be used in conjunction with methods that can aid/promote the transfer of the coating. These include introducing stimuli to the coated device once on-site in the body (where the device is delivered either transiently or permanently). Such stimuli can be provided to induce a chemical response (light, heat, radiation, etc.) in the coating or can provide mechanical forces to augment the transfer of the coating into the tissue (ultrasound, translation, rotation, vibration and combinations thereof).
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the substrate using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is freed from the substrate using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is dissociated from the substrate using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred from the substrate using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred to the intervention site using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is delivered to the intervention site using a mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises at least one of a compressive force, a shear force, a tensile force, a force exerted on the coating from a substrate side of the coating, a force exerted on the coating by the substrate, a force exerted on the coating from an external element, a translation, a rotation, a vibration, and a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the external element is a part of the subject. In some embodiments, the external element is not part of the device. In some embodiments, the external element comprises a liquid. In some embodiments, the liquid is forced between the coating and the substrate. In some embodiments, the liquid comprises saline. In some embodiments, the liquid comprises water. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises a geometric configuration of the substrate that maximizes a shear force on the coating. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises a geometric configuration of the substrate that increases a shear force on the coating. In some embodiments, the mechanical stimulation comprises a geometric configuration of the substrate that enhances a shear force on the coating.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the substrate using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is freed from the substrate using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is dissociated from the substrate using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred from the substrate using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred to the intervention site using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is delivered to the intervention site using a chemical stimulation. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises at least one of bulk degradation, interaction with a bodily fluid, interaction with a bodily tissue, a chemical interaction with a non-bodily fluid, a chemical interaction with a chemical, an acid-base reaction, an enzymatic reaction, hydrolysis, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises bulk degradation of the coating. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises interaction of the coating or a portion thereof with a bodily fluid. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises interaction of the coating or a portion thereof with a bodily tissue. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises a chemical interaction of the coating or a portion thereof with a non-bodily fluid. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises a chemical interaction of the coating or a portion thereof with a chemical. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises an acid-base reaction. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises an enzymatic reaction. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation comprises hydrolysis.
In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the chemical stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a material that is adapted to transfer, free, and/or dissociate from the substrate when at the intervention site in response to an in-situ enzymatic reaction resulting in a weak bond between the coating and the substrate.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the substrate using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is freed from the substrate using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is dissociated from the substrate using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred from the substrate using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred to the intervention site using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is delivered to the intervention site using a thermal stimulation. In some embodiments, the thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the thermal stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the thermal stimulation comprises at least one of a hot stimulus and a cold stimulus adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device by a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is freed from the substrate using a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is dissociated from the substrate using a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred from the substrate using a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred to the intervention site using a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is delivered to the intervention site using a electromagnetic stimulation. In some embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation comprises an electromagnetic wave comprising at least one of a radio wave, a micro wave, a infrared wave, near infrared wave, a visible light wave, an ultraviolet wave, a X-ray wave, and a gamma wave. In some embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the electromagnetic stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device by a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is freed from the substrate using a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is dissociated from the substrate using a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred from the substrate using a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is transferred to the intervention site using a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the coating is delivered to the intervention site using a sonic stimulation. In some embodiments, the sonic stimulation comprises a sound wave, wherein the sound wave is at least one of an ultrasound wave, an acoustic sound wave, and an infrasound wave. In some embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to augment the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to initiate the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate. In some embodiments, the sonic stimulation is adapted to cause the freeing, dissociation and/or transference of the coating from the substrate.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device by a combination of at least two of a mechanical stimulation, a chemical stimulation, an electromagnetic stimulation, and a sonic stimulation.
In some embodiments, the coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the substrate by extrusion.
Provided herein are device geometries that maximize the shear forces on the coating. Such geometric design of the device provides two advantages: (1) increases (concentrates) the force to plastically deform the drug and polymer coating (2) decreases the force of adhesion of the coating. For example, a wedge-shape aligns the forces of deformation along a shear plan as opposed to direct compression. This embodiment provides for: (1) increased efficiency in terms of % of the coating transferred (2) increased precision in amount transferred on a case-by-case basis (3) utilization of ‘harder/stiffer’ materials (biopolymers) that would otherwise not deform and/or not bulk-migrate under deployment conditions (4) minimize the chance of particulate shedding via purposefully designing the shape and direction of both the deformation and bulk migration. For example for a wedge, particles would be less likely because the coating would be pre-disposed as a shear from the device in a sheet form—with the use of soft materials, this may be illustrated as a coating of silicone caulk being extruded from the pressure of a rod being pushed into a mattress.
Another embodiment provide a geometric arrangement of the coating whereby layers, e.g. a laminate structure, are provided in the coating to modulate and control the plastic deformation, shearing and bulk-migration of the coating into the tissue.
One embodiment provides coated substrates that, upon deployment at a specific site in the patient, transfer some or all of the coating (5-10%, 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-90%, 90-99%, 99-100%) to the site of therapeutic demand.
In some embodiments, the device further comprises a release agent. In some embodiments, the release agent is biocompatible. In some embodiments, the release agent is non-biocompatible. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a powder. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a lubricant. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a surface modification of the substrate.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a physical characteristic of the coating. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic of the coating comprises a pattern. In some embodiments, the pattern is a textured surface on the substrate side of the coating, wherein the substrate side of the coating is the part of the coating on the substrate. In some embodiments, the pattern is a textured surface on the intervention site side of the coating, wherein the intervention site side of the coating is the part of the coating that is transferred to, and/or delivered to, and/or deposited at the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a viscous fluid. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid comprises oil. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to water. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to blood. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to urine. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to bile. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to synovial fluid. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to saline. In some embodiments, the viscous fluid is a fluid that is viscous relative to a bodily fluid at the intervention site.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a gel.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises at least one of the active agent and another active agent. The active agent may be placed on the substrate prior to the coating in order to act as the release agent. The active agent may be a different active agent than the active agent in the coating. The active agent that is the release agent may provide for a second source of drug to be delivered to the intervention site or another location once the coating is released from (or transferred from, or freed from, or dissociated from) the substrate.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a physical characteristic of the substrate. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic of the substrate comprises at least one of a patterned coating surface and a ribbed coating surface. In some embodiments, the patterned coating surface comprises a stent framework. In some embodiments, the ribbed coating surface comprises an undulating substrate surface. In some embodiments, the ribbed coating surface comprises an substrate surface having bumps thereon.
In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a property that is capable of changing at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the property comprises a physical property. In some embodiments, the property comprises a chemical property. In some embodiments, the release agent is capable of changing a property when in contact with at least one of a biologic tissue and a biologic fluid. In some embodiments, the release agent is capable of changing a property when in contact with an aqueous liquid.
In some embodiments, the release agent is between the substrate and the coating.
Methods of Manufacturing Generally
In some embodiments, a coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing a polymer and/or the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process.
In some embodiments, the process of forming the coating provides improved adherence of the coating to the substrate prior to deployment of the device at the intervention site and facilitates dissociation of the coating from the substrate at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing the active agent by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without electrically charging the substrate. In some embodiments, the coating is formed on the substrate by a process comprising depositing the active agent on the substrate by an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, or an e-DPC process without creating an electrical potential between the substrate and a coating apparatus used to deposit the active agent.
Means for creating the bioabsorbable polymer(s)+drug (s) coating of the device with or without a substrate:
In some embodiments, the coating comprises a microstructure. In some embodiments, particles of the active agent are sequestered or encapsulated within the microstructure. In some embodiments, the microstructure comprises microchannels, micropores and/or microcavities. In some embodiments, the microstructure is selected to allow sustained release of the active agent. In some embodiments, the microstructure is selected to allow controlled release of the active agent.
Other methods for preparing the coating include solvent based coating methods and plasma based coating methods. In some embodiments, the coating is prepared by a solvent based coating method. In some embodiments, the coating is prepared by a solvent plasma based coating method.
Another advantage of the present invention is the ability to create a delivery device with a controlled (dialed-in) drug-elution profile. Via the ability to have different materials in each layer of the laminate structure and the ability to control the location of drug(s) independently in these layers, the method enables a device that could release drugs at very specific elution profiles, programmed sequential and/or parallel elution profiles. Also, the present invention allows controlled elution of one drug without affecting the elution of a second drug (or different doses of the same drug).
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to transfer from the substrate to an intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process without electrically charging the substrate, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to transfer from the substrate to an intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process without creating an electrical potential between the substrate and a coating apparatus used in the at least one e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to transfer from the substrate to an intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of a dipping and/or a spraying process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to transfer from the substrate to an intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to free from the substrate upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of a dipping and/or a spraying process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to free from the substrate upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to dissociate from the substrate upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of a dipping and/or a spraying process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to dissociate from the substrate upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of an e-RESS, an e-SEDS, and an e-DPC process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to deliver to the intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
Provided herein is a method of forming a medical device comprising a substrate and a coating on at least a portion of the substrate, wherein the coating comprises an active agent, the method comprising: providing the substrate; and forming the coating on at least a portion of the substrate by depositing the active agent by on the substrate by at least one of a dipping and/or a spraying process, wherein forming the coating results in at least a portion of the coating being adapted to deliver to the intervention site upon stimulating the coating with a stimulation.
In some embodiments, the e-RESS, the e-SEDS, and/or the e-DPC process used in forming the coating is performed without electrically charging the substrate. In some embodiments, the e-RESS, the e-SEDS, and/or the e-DPC process used in forming the coating is performed without creating an electrical potential between the substrate and the coating apparatus used in the e-RESS, the e-SEDS, and/or the e-DPC process.
In some embodiments, forming the coating results in the coating adhering to the substrate prior to the substrate reaching the intervention site.
Some embodiments further comprise providing a release agent on the substrate. In some embodiments, providing the release agent step is performed prior to the forming the coating step. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises at least one of: a biocompatible release agent, a non-biocompatible release agent, a powder, a lubricant, a surface modification of the substrate, a viscous fluid, a gel, the active agent, a second active agent, a physical characteristic of the substrate. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic of the substrate comprises at least one of: a patterned coating surface of the substrate, and a ribbed surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, the release agent comprises a property that is capable of changing at the intervention site. In some embodiments, the property comprises a physical property. In some embodiments, the property comprises a chemical property. In some embodiments, the release agent is capable of changing a property when in contact with at least one of a biologic tissue and a biologic fluid. In some embodiments, the release agent is capable of changing a property when in contact with an aqueous liquid. In some embodiments, the coating results in a coating property that facilitates transfer of the coating to the intervention site. In some embodiments, the coating property comprises a physical characteristic of the coating. In some embodiments, the physical characteristic comprises a pattern.
In some embodiments, forming the coating facilitates transfer of the coating to the intervention site.
In some embodiments, transferring, freeing, dissociating, depositing, and/or tacking step comprises softening the polymer by hydration, degradation or by a combination of hydration and degradation. In some embodiments, the transferring, freeing, dissociating, depositing, and/or tacking step comprises softening the polymer by hydrolysis of the polymer.
In some embodiments, the providing step comprises forming the coating by a solvent based coating method. In some embodiments, the providing step comprises forming the coating by a solvent plasma based method.
In some embodiments, providing the device comprises depositing a plurality of layers on the substrate to form the coating, wherein at least one of the layers comprises the active agent. In some embodiments, at least one of the layers comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the polymer is bioabsorbable. In some embodiments, the active agent and the polymer are in the same layer, in separate layers, or form overlapping layers. In some embodiments, the plurality of layers comprise five layers deposited as follows: a first polymer layer, a first active agent layer, a second polymer layer, a second active agent layer and a third polymer layer.
The following examples are provided to illustrate selected embodiments. They should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention, but merely as being illustrative and representative thereof. For each example listed herein, multiple analytical techniques may be provided. Any single technique of the multiple techniques listed may be sufficient to show the parameter and/or characteristic being tested, or any combination of techniques may be used to show such parameter and/or characteristic. Those skilled in the art will be familiar with a wide range of analytical techniques for the characterization of drug/polymer coatings. Techniques presented here, but not limited to, may be used to additionally and/or alternatively characterize specific properties of the coatings with variations and adjustments employed which would be obvious to those skilled in the art.
Sample Preparation
Generally speaking, coatings on stents, on balloons, on coupons, on other substrates, or on samples prepared for in-vivo models are prepared as herein. Nevertheless, modifications for a given analytical method are presented within the examples shown, and/or would be obvious to one having skill in the art. Thus, numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein and examples provided may be employed in practicing the invention and showing the parameters and/or characteristics described.
Coatings on Balloons
Coated balloons as described herein and/or made by a method disclosed herein are prepared. In some examples, the coated balloons have a targeted coating thickness of ˜15 microns (˜5 microns of active agent). In some examples, the coating process is PDPDP (Polymer, sinter, Drug, Polymer, sinter, Drug, Polymer, sinter) using deposition of drug in dry powder form and deposition of polymer particles by RESS methods and equipment described herein. In the illustrations herein, resulting coated balloons may have a 3-layer coating comprising polymer (for example, PLGA) in the first layer, drug (for example, rapamycin) in a second layer and polymer in the third layer, where a portion of the third layer is substantially drug free (e.g. a sub-layer within the third layer having a thickness equal to a fraction of the thickness of the third layer). As described layer, the middle layer (or drug layer) may be overlapping with one or both first (polymer) and third (polymer) layer. The overlap between the drug layer and the polymer layers is defined by extension of polymer material into physical space largely occupied by the drug. The overlap between the drug and polymer layers may relate to partial packing of the drug particles during the formation of the drug layer. When crystal drug particles are deposited on top of the first polymer layer, voids and or gaps may remain between dry crystal particles. The voids and gaps are available to be occupied by particles deposited during the formation of the third (polymer) layer. Some of the particles from the third (polymer) layer may rest in the vicinity of drug particles in the second (drug) layer. When the sintering step is completed for the third (polymer) layer, the third polymer layer particles fuse to form a continuous film that forms the third (polymer) layer. In some embodiments, the third (polymer) layer however will have a portion along the longitudinal axis of the stent whereby the portion is free of contacts between polymer material and drug particles. The portion of the third layer that is substantially of contact with drug particles can be as thin as 1 nanometer.
Polymer-coated balloons having coatings comprising polymer but no drug are made by a method disclosed herein and are prepared having a targeted coating thickness of, for example, about, about 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 microns, depending in part on whether the coating expands upon hydration and if so whether it is hydrated. In embodiments, the coating thickness is 1-5 microns. In other embodiments, it is 1-10 microns.
An example coating process is PPP (PLGA, sinter, PLGA, sinter, PLGA, sinter) using RESS methods and equipment described herein. These polymer-coated balloons may be used as control samples in some of the examples, infra.
In some examples, the balloons are made of a compliant polymer. In some examples, the balloons are made of a non-compliant polymer. The balloons may be, in some examples, 5 to 50 mm in length, preferably 10-20 mm in length.
Balloons can be coated while inflated, and later compacted, or they can be coated while uninflated. If a balloon is coated while inflated and later folded or otherwise compacted, then a portion of the coating can be protected during insertion by virtue of being disposed within the portion of the balloon that is not exposed until inflation. The coating can also be protected by using a sheath or other covering, as described in the art for facilitating insertion of an angioplasty balloon.
The coating released from a balloon may be analyzed (for example, for analysis of a coating band and/or coating a portion of the balloon). Alternatively, in some examples, the coating is analyzed directly on the balloon. This coating, and/or coating and balloon, may be sliced into sections which may be turned 90 degrees and visualized using the surface composition techniques presented herein or other techniques known in the art for surface composition analysis (or other characteristics, such as crystallinity, for example). In this way, what could be an analysis of coating composition through a depth when the coating is on the balloon or as removed from the balloon (i.e. a depth from the abluminal surface of the coating to the surface of the removed coating that once contacted the balloon or a portion thereof), becomes a surface analysis of the coating which can, for example, show the layers in the slice of coating, at much higher resolution. Residual coating on an extracted balloon also can be analyzed and compared to the amount of coating on an unused balloon, using, e.g., HPLC, as noted herein. Coating removed from the balloon, or analyzed without removal and/or release from the balloon, may be treated the same way, and assayed, visualized, and/or characterized as presented herein using the techniques described and/or other techniques known to a person of skill in the art.
Sample Preparation for In-Vivo Models
Devices comprising balloons having coatings disclosed herein are deployed in the porcine coronary arteries of pigs (domestic swine, juvenile farm pigs, or Yucatan miniature swine). Porcine coronary angioplasty is exploited herein since such model yields results that are comparable to other investigations assaying neointimal hyperplasia in human subjects. The balloons are expanded to a 1:1.1 balloon:artery ratio. At multiple time points, animals are euthanized (e.g. t=1 day, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days), the tissue surrounding the intervention site is extracted, and assayed.
Devices comprising balloons having coatings disclosed herein alternatively are implanted in the common iliac arteries of New Zealand white rabbits. The balloons are expanded to a 1:1.1 balloon:artery ratio. At multiple time points, animals are euthanized (e.g., t=1 day, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days), the tissue surrounding the intervention site is extracted, and assayed.
A cutting balloon is coated comprising a polymer and an active agent. The coated cutting balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. Upon deflation and removal of the cutting balloon from the intervention site, at least about 5% to at least about 30% of the coating is freed from the surface of the cutting balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a cutting balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. Equipment and process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-C arboxy late End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for a Seldinger procedure using a cutting balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment. A serum sample as well as a tissue sample from the deployment site is collected.
The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration. In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is an angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
Other in-vivo tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated cutting balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. Other in-vitro tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
A cutting balloon is coated using a solution-based system (spray or dip coating) comprising a polymer and an active agent. The coated cutting balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. At least about 5% to at least about 30% of the coating is freed from the surface of the cutting balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process using a spray and/or dip coating process is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a cutting balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. Equipment and coating process using a spray and/or dip coating process is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester EndGroup, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process using a spray and/or dip coating process is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for aSeldinger procedure using a cutting balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus ˜20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment.
The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration. In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is an angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
Other in-vivo tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated cutting balloon prepared in using spray and/or dip coating process is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. Other in-vitro tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
A cutting balloon is coated comprising a release agent, a polymer and an active agent. The coated cutting balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. At least about 5% to at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the surface of the cutting balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macro lide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 2 is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freedfrom the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a cutting balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. Equipment and process similar to Example 2 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. The release agent is ePTFE powder. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 2 is employed. The release agent a micronized active agent or another active agent in a micronized form. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for aSeldinger procedure using a cutting balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment. The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration.
In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is an angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
Other in-vivo tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated cutting balloon prepared in Example 2 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating transferred from the balloon. Other in-vitro tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
A cutting balloon is coated comprising a polymer and an active agent. The coated cutting balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. At least about 10% to at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the surface of the cutting balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 3 is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a cutting balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. Equipment and process similar to Example 3 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-C arboxy late End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 3 is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for a Seldinger procedure using a cutting balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment.
The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration. In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is a cutting angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the cutting balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
Other in-vivo tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated cutting balloon prepared in Example 3 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1(www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. Other in-vitro tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
A cutting balloon is coated with a formulation comprising a base layer of methyl acrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer and additional layers of PLGA+paclitaxel with total dose of paclitaxel approx. 0.5 μg/mm2 of the wire. The coating and sintering process is similar to that as described in Example 1. The balloon is constructed of a semipermable polymer. The pressurization medium is pH 8 phosphate buffer. The coated cutting balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is pressurized to at least to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. Upon pressurization of the cutting balloon in the diseased artery, at least about 10% to at least about 30% of the coating is released into the intervention site and upon depressurization and removal of the device, this material is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment the pH mediated release of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment the pH mediated release of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, a base layer of methyl acrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer is formed and additional layers of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The balloon is constructed of a semipermable polymer. The pressurization medium is pH 8 phosphate buffer. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a cutting balloon is coated with a base layer of methyl acrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer and additional layers of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus ˜20μ. Equipment and process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. The balloon is constructed of a semipermable polymer. The pressurization medium is pH 8 phosphate buffer. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-C arboxy late End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the cutting balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for a Seldinger procedure using a cutting balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg with the coating preferentially on the wire of the cutting balloon. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment.
The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration. In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is an cutting angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the cutting balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
Other in-vivo tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated cutting balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. Other in-vitro tests described herein may be used instead of this test and/or in addition to this test, adjusted for the particularities of this device, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Drug-Delivery Balloon (1)—Compliant Balloon
A compliant balloon is coated with a material comprising a polymer and an active agent. The coated compliant balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. Upon deflation and removal of the compliant balloon from the intervention site, at least about 5% to at least about 30% of the coating is freed from the surface of the compliant balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the compliant balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a compliant balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg. Equipment and process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. Upon inflation of the compliant balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester EndGroup, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the compliant balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo testing: A group of 27 New Zealand white rabbits is prepared for a Seldinger procedure using a compliant balloon coated with a formulation of 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group (MW−19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months) and sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg. The device is placed at a coronary artery intervention site with the assistance of fluoroscopy to aid in positioning the device at the same location in each subject. Six animals are subjected to the procedure using a coated balloon that does not have sirolimus in the coating. After deployment and removal of the device, 3 control animals are sacrificed at 1 hour post deployment and serum and tissue samples are collected. The 3 remaining control animals are sacrificed at 56 days post deployment. During the course of the study, serum samples are collected from control and drug-treated animals every five days. The drug treated animals, 3 each, are sacrificed at 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days and 56 days post deployment. The tissue and serum samples may be subjected to analysis for sirolimus concentration.
In order to determine the amount of coating freed from the device and/or delivered to the intervention site as a percent of the total amount of coating on the substrate, the tissue concentration of sirolimus at the one hour time point (or any time point within the first day following of the procedure) may be used along with the total content expected for the coating (based on the total content for the manufacturing lot) or along with the content of coating remaining on the device once removed and the percentage calculated. This percentage is correlative of the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device and delivered to the intervention site. Alternatively, the tissue may be analyzed by various means (noted herein, including but not limited to SEM, TEM, and, where image enhanced polymers are used, various imaging means capable of detecting these enhanced polymers) to detect the percent of the coating freed, dissociated and/or transferred from the substrate and delivered to the intervention site. Again, the amount of coating known to be on the substrate based on manufacturing lot characteristics, and/or an assessment of the coating remaining on the device following removal of the device from the subject (for example, wherein the device is a cutting angioplasty catheter and the substrate is the balloon of the catheter) may be used to determine the percent of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device. In some instances, an assessment of the device following the procedure alone is sufficient to assess the amount freed or dissociated from the substrate, without determination of the amount delivered to the intervention site. Additionally, where a determination of improvement and/or disease treatment is desired, levels of proinflammatory markers could be tested to show improvement and/or treatment of a disease and/or ailment, for example, by testing high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-I). The release kinetics of the drug may be shown by plotting the sirolimus concentrations at the timepoints noted above.
For embodiments using different drugs other than sirolimus, the biomarkers are selected based on the disease to be treated and the drugs administered during the course of therapy as determined by one of skill in the art. These biomarkers may be used to show the treatment results for each subject.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. Optical microscopy is performed on the tubing and/or the balloon (which is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure, at least) to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the tubing and/or the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon.
Method for the determination of sirolimus levels: Media may be assayed for sirolimus content using HPLC. Calibration standards containing known amounts of drug are to determine the amount of drug eluted. The multiple peaks present for the sirolimus (also present in the calibration standards) are added to give the amount of drug eluted at that time period (in absolute amount and as a cumulative amount eluted). HPLC analysis is performed using Waters HPLC system, set up and run on each sample as provided in the Table 1 below using an injection volume of 100 L.
In-vitro Mass Loss test: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is weighed on a microbalance and then secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. After drying, the balloon is removed from the guidewire, further dried and weighed on a microbalance. Comparison of the pre- and post-deployment weights indicates how much coating is freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. This analysis may instead and/or alternatively include testing of the tubing to determine the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device during this in-vitro test.
In-vitro Coating test: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. The section of tubing exposed to the deployed balloon is cut away from the remainder of the tubing and the interior of the excised tubing rinsed with a small amount of ethanol and an amount of methylene chloride to make up 25 mL total volume of rinsings which are collected in a flask for analysis. Analysis by HPLC as described above is performed to determine the amount of material freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. This analysis may instead and/or alternatively include testing of the substrate itself to determine the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device during this in-vitro test.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of resected coronary artery from Yucatan miniature swine is positionally fixed and filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the artery and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the arterial wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the artery. The section of artery exposed to the deployed balloon is cut away from the remainder of the artery section, placed into a tissue homogonizer and the homogonized material is extracted with methylene chloride to make up 25 mL total volume of rinsings which are collected in a flask for analysis. Analysis by HPLC as described above is performed to determine the amount of material freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the balloon. This analysis may instead and/or alternatively include testing of the substrate itself to determine the amount of coating freed, dissociated, and/or transferred from the device during this in-vitro test.
For embodiments related to non-vascular or non-lumenal applications, e.g. a tumor site or other cavity or a cannulized site, the same technique is employed with the modification that the tissue to be assayed is resected from the tissue adjoining cavity receiving drug treatment.
In-vitro testing: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A segment of resected coronary artery from Yucatan miniature swine is positionally fixed and filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the artery and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the arterial wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the artery. The section of artery exposed to the deployed balloon is cut away from the remainder of the artery section and incised lengthwise to lay open the artery. Optical microscopy is performed on the interior of artery to determine the presence and amount of coating transferred to the artery and/or the amount of coating transferred from the balloon. The tissue sample is also subjected to TEM-SEM analysis.
In-vitro testing of release kinetics: One sample of the coated compliant balloon with total loading of sirolimus ˜20 μg prepared in Example 1 is secured to a balloon catheter. A flask containing exactly 25 mL of pH 7.4 aqueous phosphate buffer equilibrated to 37° C. equipped for magnetic stirring is prepared. Into this flask is placed the coated balloon and the catheter portion of the apparatus is secured such that the balloon does not touch the sides of the flask. The balloon is inflated to 120 psi with sterile water. Aliquots of 100 L are removed prior to addition of the balloon, after placement of the balloon but prior to inflation of the balloon, and at regular time intervals of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 minutes. Upon removal of each aliquot an equivalent volume of aqueous buffer is added to maintain the volume at 25 mL. The aliquots are analyzed by HPLC as described above for the concentration of sirolimus.
In-vitro testing for distal flow particulates: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a guidewire incorporating a porous filter of 100 m pore size, such as the Cordis AngioGuard emboli capture guidewire. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject. The coated balloon is inserted into the tubing, the proximal end of the tubing surrounding the guidewire sealed with epoxy, and a hypodermic needle which is attached to an infusion pump and reservoir of 37° C. phosphate-buffered saline solution is inserted into the tubing proximal to the balloon assembly. The flow of saline is commenced, the distal filter is deployed and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. The filter is deployed for 5 minutes after removal of the balloon, the flow of saline is halted, the tubing cut adjacent to the epoxy seal, the filter retracted and removed from the tubing. The content of the filter is analyzed.
In-vitro testing for distal flow particulates: One sample of the coated compliant balloon prepared in Example 1 is secured to a guidewire. A segment of optically clear TYGON® B-44-3 tubing with O.D.=0.125″, LD.=0.0625″ (Available from McMaster-Carr Part Number: 5114K1 1 (www.mcmaster.com)) is filled with phosphate-buffered saline solution and immersed in a water bath at 37° C. to mimic physiological conditions of deployment into a subject and the distal end of the tubing is connected to a turbidity light scattering detector as described in Analytical Ultracentrifugation of Polymers and Nanoparticles, W. Machtle and L. Borger, (Springer) 2006, p. 41. The coated balloon is inserted into the proximal end of the tubing, the proximal end of the tubing surrounding the guidewire sealed with epoxy, and a hypodermic needle which is attached to an infusion pump and reservoir of 37° C. phosphate-buffered saline solution is inserted into the tubing proximal to the balloon assembly. The flow of saline is commenced, a baseline for light transmission through the detector is established and the balloon is inflated to at least 25% below the balloon's nominal pressure to mechanically transfer the coating from the balloon to the tubing wall. The balloon is deflated and removed from the tubing. The flow is maintained for 10 minutes after removal of the balloon, and the flow is analyzed for the presence of particles based on detector response.
Drug-Delivery Balloon (2)—
Non-Compliant Balloon
A non-compliant balloon is coated with a material comprising a polymer and an active agent. The coated non-compliant balloon is positioned at the intervention site. The balloon is inflated to at least 25% below its nominal inflation pressure. Upon deflation and removal of the non-compliant balloon from the intervention site, at least about 5% to at least about 30% of the coating is freed from the surface of the non-compliant balloon and is deposited at the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon unfolds during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon to the intervention site.
In some examples, the balloon twists during inflation, causing mechanical shearing forces to at least augment transfer and/or freeing and/or deposition of the coating from the balloon.
In one example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate ˜28 days. The active agent is a pharmaceutical agent such as a macrolide immunosuppressive drug. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a vascular lumen wall. Upon inflation of the non-compliant balloon, at least about 50% of the coating is freed from the device at the intervention site.
In another example, a non-compliant balloon is coated with a formulation of PLGA+sirolimus with total loading of sirolimus −20 μg. Equipment and process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a coronary artery. Upon inflation of the non-compliant balloon, about 5% to about 15% of the coating is freed from the device resulting in delivery of −2.0 μg of drug delivered to the artery.
In another example, the polymer of the coating is 50:50 PLGA-Ester End Group, MW˜19 kD, degradation rate −1-2 months or 50:50 PLGA-Carboxylate End Group, MW-IOkD, degradation rate −28 days. The active agent is a chemotherapeutic agent. Equipment and coating process similar to Example 1 is employed. The intervention site is a cavity resulting from removal of a tumor. Upon inflation of the non-compliant balloon, at least about 75% of the coating is transferred from the device to the intervention site.
In-vivo and/or in-vitro testing may be performed according to the methods described herein.
Sirolimus Coated Balloon Formulation Tested in Rabbits
GHOST Rapid Exchange (Rx) Catheter was used in this example. Ghost 3.0×18 mm Rx catheter balloons were coated and used in animal study
Study Outline:
A. Expansion in rabbit iliac arteries: 8 balloons (4 rabbits)
Balloons left un-inflated for 2 min in aorta
% Sirolimus lost based on balloon batch average from UV-Vis data
% Sirolimus lost variables:
1. Balloon insertion into aorta (via jugular)
2. Blood Flow
3. Pleat/Fold/Sheath
4. −10% lost during shipping
Sirolimiis Coated Balloon Animal (Rabbit) Study Formulation Summary
The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention, and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/384,216, filed Mar. 20, 2012, which claims priority to United National Phase Application International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/42355, filed Jul. 16, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/226,239 filed Jul. 16, 2009, each of which are incorporated herein in their entirety. This application also relates to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/081,691, filed Jul. 17, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/212,964, filed Apr. 17, 2009. The contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3087860 | Endicott et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
| 3123077 | Alcamo | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3457280 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3597449 | Deprospero et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3737337 | Schnoring et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3773919 | Boswell et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3929992 | Sehgal et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4000137 | Dvonch et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4188373 | Krezanoski | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4285987 | Ayer et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4326532 | Hammar | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4336381 | Nagata et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4389330 | Tice et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4474572 | McNaughton et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4474751 | Haslam et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4478822 | Haslam et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4530840 | Tice et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4582731 | Smith | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4606347 | Fogarty et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617751 | Johansson | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4675189 | Kent et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734227 | Smith | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734451 | Smith | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4758435 | Schaaf | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762593 | Youngner | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4931037 | Wetterman | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4950239 | Gahara et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4985625 | Hurst | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5000519 | Moore | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5090419 | Palestrant | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096848 | Kawamura | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5104404 | Wolff | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5106650 | Hoy et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5125570 | Jones | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5158986 | Cha et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5185776 | Townsend | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5195969 | Wang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5243023 | Dezem | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5270086 | Hamlin | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5288711 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5320634 | Vigil | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324049 | Mistrater et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5340614 | Perman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5350361 | Tsukashima et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350627 | Nemphos et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360403 | Mische | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5362718 | Skotnicki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366504 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368045 | Clement et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372676 | Lowe | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5385776 | Maxfield et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387313 | Thoms | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5403347 | Roby et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5470603 | Staniforth et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5494620 | Liu et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5500180 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5545208 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5556383 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5562922 | Lambert | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569463 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570537 | Black et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578709 | Woiszwillo | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5599576 | Opolski | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5626611 | Liu et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5626862 | Brem et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632772 | Alcime et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5669932 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674192 | Sahatjian et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5674242 | Phan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5674286 | D'Alessio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5725570 | Heath | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733303 | Israel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5766158 | Opolski | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800511 | Mayer | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807404 | Richter | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811032 | Kawai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843120 | Israel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871436 | Eury | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876426 | Kume et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876452 | Athanasiou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5913895 | Burpee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5924631 | Rodrigues et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5948020 | Yoon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981719 | Woiszwillo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6013855 | McPherson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6036978 | Gombotz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6068656 | Von Oepen | May 2000 | A |
| 6071308 | Ballou et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077880 | Castillo et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090925 | Woiszwillo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6129755 | Mathis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143037 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143314 | Chandrashekar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146356 | Wang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146404 | Kim et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6147135 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6171327 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6190699 | Luzzi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193744 | Ehr et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206914 | Soykan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217608 | Penn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231599 | Ley | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231600 | Zhong | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245104 | Alt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248127 | Shah et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248129 | Froix | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251980 | Lan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6268053 | Woiszwillo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284758 | Egi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299635 | Frantzen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309669 | Setterstrom et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319541 | Pletcher et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325821 | Gaschino et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336934 | Gilson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342062 | Suon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344055 | Shukov | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6355691 | Goodman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358556 | Ding et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361819 | Tedeschi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6362718 | Patrick et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364903 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6368658 | Schwarz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372246 | Wei et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409716 | Sahatjian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414050 | Howdle et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416779 | D'Augustine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6448315 | Lidgren et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458387 | Scott et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461380 | Cox | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461644 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6488703 | Kveen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495163 | Jordan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6497729 | Moussy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6506213 | Mandel et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517860 | Roser et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6521258 | Mandel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524698 | Schmoock | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537310 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541033 | Shah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6572813 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6602281 | Klein | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610013 | Fenster et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6627246 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6649627 | Cecchi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6660176 | Tepper et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669785 | DeYoung et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669980 | Hansen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6670407 | Howdle et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6682757 | Wright | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6706283 | Appel et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710059 | Labrie et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6720003 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723913 | Barbetta | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6726712 | Raeder-Devens et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6736996 | Carbonell et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743505 | Antal et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749902 | Yonker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755871 | Damaso et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756084 | Fulton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6767558 | Wang | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6780475 | Fulton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6794902 | Becker et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800663 | Asgarzadeh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6815218 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6821549 | Jayaraman | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6837611 | Kuo | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6838089 | Carlsson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6838528 | Zhao | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6858598 | McKearn et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6860123 | Uhlin | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6868123 | Uhlin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6884377 | Burnham et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6884823 | Pierick et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6897205 | Beckert et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6905555 | DeYoung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6908624 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6916800 | McKearn et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6923979 | Fotland et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936270 | Watson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939569 | Green et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6973718 | Sheppard, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7056591 | Pacetti et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7094256 | Shah et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7148201 | Stern et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152452 | Kokish | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7160592 | Rypacek et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163715 | Kramer | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7169404 | Hossainy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171255 | Holupka et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7201750 | Eggers et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7201940 | Kramer | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7229837 | Chen | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7278174 | Villalobos | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7279174 | Pacetti et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7282020 | Kaplan | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7308748 | Kokish | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7323454 | De Nijs et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7326734 | Zi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7329383 | Stinson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7378105 | Burke et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7419696 | Berg et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7429378 | Serhan et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7444162 | Hassan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7455658 | Wang | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7455688 | Furst et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7456151 | Li et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7462593 | Cuttitta et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7485113 | Varner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7498042 | Igaki et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7524865 | D'Amato et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7537610 | Reiss | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7537785 | Loscalzo et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7553827 | Attawia et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7713538 | Lewis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7727275 | Betts et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7745566 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7763277 | Canham et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7771468 | Whitbourne et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7837726 | Von Oepen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842312 | Burgermeister et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7919108 | Reyes et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7955383 | Krivoruchko et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7967855 | Furst et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7972661 | Pui et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8070796 | Furst et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8109904 | Papp | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8295565 | Gu et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8298565 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8333803 | Park et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8377356 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8535372 | Fox et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8709071 | Huang et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8753659 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8753709 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8758429 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8795762 | Fulton et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8834913 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8852625 | DeYoung et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8900651 | McClain et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9090029 | Prevost | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9433516 | McClain et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9486431 | McClain et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 20010026804 | Boutignon | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034336 | Shah et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037143 | Oepen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044629 | Stinson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049551 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007209 | Scheerder et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051485 | Bottomley | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051845 | Mehta et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082680 | Shanley et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091433 | Ding et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099332 | Slepian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020125860 | Schworm et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133072 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144757 | Craig et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151959 | Von Oepen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030001830 | Wampler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004563 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028244 | Bates et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030031699 | Van Antwerp | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077200 | Craig et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088307 | Shulze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125800 | Shulze et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143315 | Pui et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170305 | O'Neil et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180376 | Dalal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185964 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204238 | Tedeschi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209835 | Chun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222017 | Fulton et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222018 | Yonker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232014 | Burke et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013792 | Epstein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040018228 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022400 | Magrath | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022853 | Ashton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044397 | Stinson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059290 | Palasis | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096477 | Chauhan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102758 | Davila et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106982 | Jalisi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122205 | Nathan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126542 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143317 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040144317 | Chuman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147904 | Hung et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157789 | Geall | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170685 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193177 | Houghton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193262 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220660 | Shanley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224001 | Pacetti et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234748 | Stenzel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236416 | Falotico | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260000 | Chaiko | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003074 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004661 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010275 | Sahatjian et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015046 | Weber et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050019747 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033414 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038498 | Dubrow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048121 | East et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049694 | Neary | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053639 | Shalaby | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060028 | Horres et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069630 | Fox et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070989 | Lye et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070990 | Stinson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070997 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074479 | Weber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075714 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079199 | Heruth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079274 | Palasis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084533 | Howdle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131008 | Betts et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131513 | Myers | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147734 | Seppala et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159704 | Scott et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050166841 | Robida | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050175772 | Worsham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177223 | Palmaz | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050191491 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196424 | Chappa | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208102 | Schultz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209244 | Prescott et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209680 | Gale et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216075 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220839 | DeWitt et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222676 | Shanley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238829 | Motherwell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245637 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255327 | Chaney et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260186 | Bookbinder et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268573 | Yan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288481 | DesNoyer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288629 | Kunis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060001011 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060002974 | Pacetti et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020325 | Burgermeister et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030652 | Adams et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045901 | Weber | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067974 | Labrecque et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073329 | Boyce et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089705 | Ding et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093771 | Rypacek et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094744 | Maryanoff et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104969 | Oray et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106455 | Furst et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116755 | Stinson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121080 | Lye et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121089 | Michal et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134168 | Chappa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134211 | Lien et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136041 | Schmid et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147698 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153729 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160455 | Sugyo et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188547 | Bezwada | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193886 | Owens et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193890 | Owens et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198868 | DeWitt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210638 | Liversidge et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216324 | Stucke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222756 | Davila et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060228415 | Oberegger et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060228453 | Cromack et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235506 | Ta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276877 | Owens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287611 | Fleming | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070009564 | McClain et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009664 | Fallais et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026041 | DesNoyer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026042 | Narayanan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032864 | Furst et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038227 | Massicotte et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038289 | Nishide et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043434 | Meerkin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070059350 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065478 | Hossainy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110888 | Radhakrishnan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123973 | Roth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123977 | Cottone et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128274 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148251 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154513 | Atanasoska et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154554 | Burgermeister et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196242 | Boozer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196423 | Ruane et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198081 | Castro et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070200268 | Dave | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203569 | Burgermeister et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219579 | Paul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225795 | Granada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250157 | Nishide et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259017 | Francis | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280992 | Margaron et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080030066 | Mercier et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051866 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065192 | Berglund | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071347 | Cambronne | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071358 | Weber et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071359 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075753 | Chappa | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077232 | Nishide | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080085880 | Viswanath et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091008 | Viswanath | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095919 | McClain et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097575 | Cottone | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097591 | Savage et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098178 | Veazey et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107702 | Jennissen | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118543 | Pacetti et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124372 | Hossainy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138375 | Yan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206304 | Lindquist et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213464 | O'Connor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233267 | Berglund | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255510 | Wang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269449 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286325 | Reyes et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292776 | Dias et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300669 | Hossainy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300689 | McKinnon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090043379 | Prescott | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062909 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068266 | Raheja et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076446 | Dubuclet, IV et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082855 | Borges et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098178 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105687 | Deckman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105809 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090110711 | Trollsas et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090111787 | Lim et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090123515 | Taylor et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090123521 | Weber et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186069 | DeYoung et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202609 | Keough et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216317 | Cromack et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227949 | Knapp et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090231578 | Ling et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263460 | McDonald | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285974 | Kerrigan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292351 | McClain et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292776 | Nesbitt et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090297578 | Trollsas et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300689 | Conte et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000328 | Mahmoud | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006358 | Ishikawa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100015200 | McClain et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030261 | McClain | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042206 | Yadav et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055145 | Betts et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055294 | Wang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063570 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063580 | McClain et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100074934 | Hunter | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131044 | Patel | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100155496 | Stark et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166869 | Desai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179475 | Hoffmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196482 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198330 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198331 | Rapoza et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211164 | McClain et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228348 | McClain et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233332 | Xing et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100239635 | McClain et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241220 | McClain et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256746 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256748 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262224 | Kleiner | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272775 | Cleek et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272778 | McClain et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285085 | Stankus | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298928 | McClain et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303881 | Hoke et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305689 | Venkatraman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009953 | Luk et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022027 | Morishita et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110034422 | Kannan et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060073 | Huang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159069 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160751 | Granja Filho | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172763 | Ndondo-Lay | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189299 | Okubo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190864 | McClain et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223212 | Taton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238161 | Fulton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243884 | O'Shea et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257732 | McClain et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264190 | McClain et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301697 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120064124 | McClain et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120064143 | Sharp et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065723 | Drasler et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101566 | Mews et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150275 | Shaw-Klein | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120160408 | Clerc et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172787 | McClain et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120177742 | McClain et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120231037 | Levi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239161 | Datta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271396 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280432 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290075 | Mortisen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323311 | McClain et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006351 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130035754 | Shulze et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130087270 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110138 | Hurtado et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172853 | McClain et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291476 | Broughton, Jr. et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140343667 | McClain | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140350522 | McClain et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371717 | McClain et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150024116 | Matson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150025620 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250926 | McClain et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160095726 | McClain et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2237466 | Nov 1998 | CA |
| 2589761 | Jun 2006 | CA |
| 2615452 | Jan 2007 | CA |
| 2650590 | Nov 2007 | CA |
| 2679712 | Jul 2008 | CA |
| 2684482 | Oct 2008 | CA |
| 2721832 | Dec 2009 | CA |
| 2423899 | Mar 2001 | CN |
| 1465410 | Jan 2004 | CN |
| 1575860 | Feb 2005 | CN |
| 1649551 | Aug 2005 | CN |
| 1684641 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 101161300 | Apr 2008 | CN |
| 102481195 | May 2012 | CN |
| 4336209 | Mar 1995 | DE |
| 29702671 | Apr 1997 | DE |
| 29716476 | Dec 1997 | DE |
| 19633901 | Feb 1998 | DE |
| 29716467 | Feb 1998 | DE |
| 19740506 | Mar 1998 | DE |
| 19754870 | Aug 1998 | DE |
| 19822157 | Nov 1999 | DE |
| 69611186 | May 2001 | DE |
| 0335341 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0604022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 800801 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0876806 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0982041 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1195822 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1325758 | Jul 2003 | EP |
| 1327422 | Jul 2003 | EP |
| 1454677 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1502655 | Feb 2005 | EP |
| 1909973 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 2197070 | Jun 2010 | EP |
| 2293357 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2293366 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2758253 | Jul 1998 | FR |
| 698902 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| H06218063 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| H08206223 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| H0956807 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| H1029524 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| H10151207 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| H10314313 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| H1157018 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 2000316981 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2001521503 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002239013 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2003205037 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003533286 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2003533492 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2003533493 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004512059 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004173770 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004518458 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004528060 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004529674 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2005505318 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005168646 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005519080 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005523119 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005523332 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005296690 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2006506191 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006512175 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2007502281 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007215620 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2009501566 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2009529399 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2010052503 | Mar 2010 | JP |
| 2010515539 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010516307 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2011517589 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2012527318 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2013153822 | Aug 2013 | JP |
| 1020040034064 | Apr 2004 | KR |
| 101231197 | Feb 2013 | KR |
| 9409010 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| 9506487 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| 9616691 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| 9620698 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| 9632907 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9641807 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9745502 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 9802441 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| 9908729 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9915530 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| 9917680 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| 99016388 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| 0006051 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 0025702 | May 2000 | WO |
| 00032238 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0114387 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 2001054662 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0187345 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0187368 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0187372 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 01087371 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0226281 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 0240702 | May 2002 | WO |
| 0243799 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 02055122 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 02074194 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| 02090085 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 02100456 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03039553 | May 2003 | WO |
| 03082368 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 03090684 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 03101624 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2004009145 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004028406 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004028589 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004043506 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004045450 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 04098574 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2005018696 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 05042623 | May 2005 | WO |
| 2005063319 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 05069889 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2005117942 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006014534 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006052575 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006063430 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006065685 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 06083796 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2006099276 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 07002238 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007011707 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007011708 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007017707 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007017708 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 07092179 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2007106441 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007127363 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 07143609 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008024626 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 08046641 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 08046642 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008042909 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 08052000 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008070996 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008086369 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008131131 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2008148013 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 09039553 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 09051614 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009051614 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009051780 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009096822 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2009113605 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009120361 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009146209 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010001932 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010009335 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 10075590 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010086863 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010111196 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010111232 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010111238 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010120552 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010121187 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010135369 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 10136604 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2010136604 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011009096 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011097103 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 11119762 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011119159 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 11130448 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 11133655 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011140519 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 12009684 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012009684 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 12034079 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012078955 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012082502 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 12092504 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 12142319 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| 12166819 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013003644 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013012689 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013025535 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 13059509 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 13177211 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013173657 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014063111 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014165264 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2014186532 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kelly et al., “Double-balloon trapping technique for embolization of a large widenecked superior cerebellar artery aneurysm: case report,” Neurosurgery 63(4 Suppl 2):291-292 (2008). |
| Khan et al., “Chemistry and the new uses or Sucrose: How Important?” Pur and Appl. Chem (1984) 56:833-844. |
| Khan et al., “Enzymic Regioselective Hydrolysis of Peracctylated Reducing Disaccharides, Specifically at the Anomeric Centre: Intermediates for the Synthesis of Oligosaccharides.” Tetrahedron Letters (1933) 34:7767. |
| Khan et al., Cyclic Acetals of 4,1′,6′-Trichloro-4,1′,6′,-Trideoxy- Trideoxy-galacto-Sucrose and their Conversion into Methyl Ether Derivatives. Carb. ResCarb. Res. (1990) 198:275-283. |
| Koh et al., “A novel nanostructured poly(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) multi-walled carbon nanotube composite for blood-contacting application. Thrombogenicity studies”, Acta Biomaterials 5 (2009): 3411-3422. |
| Kurt et al., “Tandem oral, rectal and nasal administrations of Ankaferd Blood Stopper to control profuse bleeding leading to hemodynamic instability,” Am J. Emerg. Med. 27(5):631, e1-2 (2009). |
| Labhasetwar et al., “Arterial uptake of biodegradable nanoparticles: effect of surface modifications,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 87, No. 10, Oct. 1998; 1229-1234. |
| Lamm et al., “Bladder Cancer: Current Optimal Intravesical Treatment: Pharmacologic Treatment,” Urologic Nursing 25 (5):323-6, 331-2 (Oct. 26, 2005). |
| Latella et al., “Nanoindentation hardness. Young's modulus, and creep behavior of organic-inorganic silica-based sol-gel thin films on copper,” J Mater Res 23(9): 2357-2365 (2008). |
| Lee et al., “Novel therapy for hearing loss: delivery of insulin-like growth factor 1 to the cochlea using gelatin hydrogel,” Otol. Neurotol. 28(7):976-81 (2007). |
| Lehmann et al, “Drug treatment of nonviral sexually transmitted diseases: specific issues in adolescents,” Paediatr Drugs 3(7):481-494 (2001). |
| Mahoney et al., “Three-Dimensional Compositional Analysis ofDmg Eluting Stent Coatings Using Cluster Secondary Ion mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem. , 80, 624-632 (2008). |
| Matsumoto, D, et al. Neointimal Coverage of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents at 6-month Follow-up: Evaluated by Optical Coherence Tomography, European Heart Journal, Nov. 29, 2006; 28:961-967. |
| McAlpine, J.B. et al., “Revised NMR Assignments for Rapamycine,” J. Antibiotics 44:688-690 (1991). |
| Mehik et al., “Alfuzosin treatment for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospecitve, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study,” Urology 62(3):425-429 (2003). |
| Melonakos et al., Treatment of low-grade bulbar transitional cell carcinoma with urethral instillation ormitmnycin C, Oct. 28, 2008, Adv. Urol., 173694 Epub. |
| Merrett et al., “Interaction of corneal cells with transforming growth factor beta2-modified poly dimethyl siloxane surfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, vol. 67A, No. 3, pp. 981-993 (2003). |
| Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, obtained online at: <http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionay/derivative>, downloaded Jan. 23, 2013. |
| Middleton and Tipton, Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devises. Biomaterials 2000; 21:2335-46. |
| Minchin, “Nanomedicine: sizing up targets with nanoparticles,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 33, Jan. 12-13, 2008. |
| Minoque et al., “Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia,” Anesth. Analg. 99(4):1253-1257 (2004). |
| Mishima et al. “Microencapsulation of Proteins by Rapid Expansion orSupercritical Solution with a Nonsolvent,” AlChE J. 2000;46(4):857-65. |
| Mocco et al., “Pharos neurovascular intracranail stent: Elective use for a symptomatic stenosis refractory to medical therapy,” Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. (epub) (Mar. 2009). |
| Mollen et al., “Prevalence oftubo-ovarian abcess in adolescents diagnosed with pelvice inflammatory disease in a pediatric emergency department,” Pediatr. Emerg. Care, 22(9): 621-625 (2006). |
| Moroni et al., “Post-ischemic brain damage:targeting PARP-1 within the ischemic neurovaschular units as a realistic avenue to stroke treatment,” FEBS J. 276(1 ):36-45 (2009). |
| Muhlen et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Targeted Toward Activated Platelets Allows in Vivo Detection of Thrombosis and Monitoring of Thrombolysis Circulation,” 118:258-267 (2008). |
| Ong and Serruys, “Technology Insight: an overview of research in drug-eluting stents,” Nat. Clin. Parct. Cardiovas. Med. 2(12):647 (2005). |
| PCT/US06/24221 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 24, 2007. |
| PCT/US06/24221 International Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2007. |
| PCT/US06/27321 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 16, 2008. |
| PCT/US06/27321 International Search Report dated Oct. 16, 2007. |
| PCT/US06/27322 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 16, 2008. |
| PCT/US06/27322 International Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2007. |
| PCT/US07/10227 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 28, 2008. |
| PCT/US07/10227 International Search Report dated Aug. 8, 2008. |
| PCT/US07/80213 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 7, 2009. |
| PCT/US07/80213 International Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2008. |
| PCT/US08/11852 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 20, 2010. |
| PCT/US08/11852 International Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2008. |
| PCT/US08/50536 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 14, 2009. |
| PCT/US08/50536 International Search Report dated Jun. 2, 2008. |
| PCT/US08/60671 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 20, 2009. |
| PCT/US08/60671 International Search Report dated Sep. 5, 2008. |
| PCT/US08/64732 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 1, 2009. |
| PCT/US08/64732 International Search Report dated Sep. 4, 2008. |
| PCT/US09/41045 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 19, 2010. |
| PCT/US09/41045 International Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2009. |
| PCT/US09/50883 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 18, 2011. |
| PCT/US09/50883 International Search Report dated Nov. 17, 2009. |
| PCT/US09/69603 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 29, 2011. |
| Torchlin, “Micellar Nanocarriers: Pharmaecutial Perspectives,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 2007. |
| Verma et al., “Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions,” Small 2010,6,No. 1, 12-21. |
| Wang et al., “Treatment with melagatran alone or in combination with thrombolytic therapy reduced ischemic brain injury,” Exp. Neuro. 213(1):171-175 (2008). |
| Wang, X.; Venkatraman, S.S.; Boey, F.Y.C.; Loo, J.S.C.; Tan, L.P. “Controlled release of sirolimus from a multilayered PLGA stent matrix” Biomaterials 2006, 27, 5588-5595. |
| Warner et al., “Mitomycin C and airway surgery: how well does it work?” Ontolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 138(6):700-709 (2008). |
| Wermuth, CG, “Similarity in drugs: reflections on analogue design”, Drug Discov Today. Apr. 2006.11(7-8):348-54. |
| Witjes et al., “Intravesical pharmacotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of currently available drugs, treatment schedules, and long-term results,” Eur. Urol. 53(1):45-52. |
| Wu et al., “Study on the preparation and characterization of biodegradable polylactide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites”, Polymer 48 (2007) 4449-4458. |
| Zilberman et al., Drug-Eluting bioresorbable steuts for various applications, Annu Rev Biomed Eng., 2006;8:158-180. |
| Han, et al., “Studies of a Novel Human Thrombomodulin Immobilized Substrate: Surface Characterization and Anticoagulation Activity Evaluation.” J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn, 2001, 12 (10), 1075-1089. |
| Khayankarn et al., “Adhesion and Permeability of Polyimide-Clay Nanocomposite Films for Protective Coatings,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 89,2875-2881 (2003). |
| Lawrance et al., “Rectal tacrolimus in the treatment of resistant ulcerative proctitis,” Aliment. Pharmacol Ther. 28(10):1214-20 (2008). |
| Murphy et al., “Chronic prostatitis: management strategies,” Drugs 69(1): 71-84 (2009). |
| O'Donnell et al., “Salvage intravesical therapy with interferon-alpha 2b plus low dose bacillus Calmette-Guerin is effective in patients with superficial bladder cancer in whom bacillus calmette-guerin alone previously failed,” Journ. Urology, 166(4): 1300-1304 (2001). |
| Olbert et al., “In vitro and in vivo effects of CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN) on murine transitional cell carcinoma and on the native murine urinary bladder wall,” Anticancer Res. 29(6):2067-2076 (2009). |
| Ristikankare et al., “Sedation, topical phamygeal anesthesia and cardiorespiratory safety during gastroscopy,” J. Clin Gastorenterol. 40(1 ):899-905 (2006). |
| Salo et al., “Biofilm formation by Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infections,” Clin Nephrol. 71(5):501-507 (2009). |
| Saxena et al., “Haemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections: current treatment options and strategies for prevention,” Swiss Med Wkly 135:127-138 (2005). |
| Scheufler et al., “Crystal Structure of Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at 2.7 Angstrom resolution,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 287, Issue 1, Mar. 1999, pp. 103-115, [retrieved online] at http://www.sciencedirect.comIscience/article/pii/S002283 699925901. |
| Sumathi et al., “Controlled comparison between betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly applied over tracheal tube to reduce postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice,” Br. J. Anaesth. 100(2):215-218 (2008). |
| Testa, B., “Prodrug research: futile or fertile?”, Biochem. Pharmacal. Dec. 1, 2004;68(11):2097-2106. |
| Xu et al., “Biodegradation of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) tube stents in bile”, Polymer Degradation and Stability. 93:811-817 (2008). |
| Xue et al., “Spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia in patients with a difficult airway: a randomized, double-blind comparison of2% and 4% lidocaine,” Anesth. blind comparison of 2% and 4% lidocaine, Anesth. Analg. 108(2): 536-543 (2009). |
| Yepes et al., “Tissue-type plasminogen activator in the ischemic brain: more than a thrombolytic,” Trends Neurosci. 32(1):48-55 (2009). |
| Yousuf et al., “Resveratrol exerts its neuroprotective effect by modulating mitochondrial dysfunction and associated cell death during cerebral ischemia”, Brain Res. 1250:242-253 (2009). |
| Zhou, S.; Deng, X.; Li, X.; Jia, W.; Liu, L. “Synthesis and Characterization of Biodegradable Low Molecular Weight Aliphatic Polyesters and Their Use in Protein-Delivery Systems” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 1848-1856. |
| O'Neil et al., “Extracellular matrix binding mixed micelles for drug delivery applications,” Journal of Controlled Release 137 (2009) 146-151. |
| PCT/US12/33367 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 15, 2013. |
| PCT/US12/33367 International Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2012. |
| PCT/US12/46545 International Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2012. |
| PCT/US11/51092 International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
| PCT/US11/51092 Written Opinion dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
| Ettmayer et al. Lessons learned from marketed and investigational prodrugs. J Med Chem. May 6, 2004;47(10):2393-404. |
| Mei et al., “Local Delivery of Modified Paclitaxel-Loaded Poly(£-caprolactone)/Pluronic F68 Nanoparticles for Long-Term Inhibition of Hyperplasia,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 98, No. 6, Jun. 2009. |
| Unger et al., “Poly(ethylene carbonate): A thermoelastic and biodegradable biomaterial for drug eluting stent coatings?” Journal to Controlled Release, vol. 117, Issue 3, 312-321 (2007). |
| Wagenlehner et al., “A pollen extract (Cemilton) in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicentre, randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study,” Eur Urol 9 (Epub) (Jun. 3, 2009). |
| PCT/US07/82275 International Search Report dated Apr. 18, 2008. |
| Schreiber, S.L. et al., “Atomic Structure of the Rapamycin Human Immunophilin FKBP-12 Complex,” J. Am. Chern. Soc. 113:7433-7435 (1991). |
| Greco et al. (Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 72 (2003) 1167-1174.). |
| PCT/US07/82775 International Preliminary Report on Patentablity dated May 5, 2009. |
| PCT/US14/38117 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 7, 2014. |
| PCT/US11/44263 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 9, 2012. |
| PCT/US13/42093 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
| Chalmers, et al. (2007) Wiley and Sons. |
| Finn et al. Differential Response of Delayed Healing . . . Circulation vol. 112 (2005) 270-8. |
| Wang et al. “Synthesis, characterization, biodegradation, and drug delivery application of biodegradable lactic/glycolic acid polymers: I. Synthesis and characterization” J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. 11(3):301-318 (2000). |
| PCT/US13/41466 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
| Ju et al., J. Pharm. Sci. vol. 84, No. 12, 1455-1463. |
| PCT/US12/50408 International Search Report dated Oct. 16, 2012. |
| European International Search Report of PCT/EP01/05736 dated Oct. 24, 2001. |
| PCT/EP01/05736 International Preliminary Examination Report dated Jan. 14, 2002. |
| PCT/EP2000/004658 International Search Report from dated Sep. 15, 2000. |
| PCT/US06/27321 Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2007. |
| Analytical Ultracentrifugation of Polymers and Nanoparticles, W. Machtle and L. Borger, (Springer) 2006, p. 41. |
| Lewis, D. H., “Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents from Lactides/Glycolide Polymers” in Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, Chasin, M. and Langer, R., eds., Marcel Decker (1990). |
| Luzzi, L.A., J. Phann. Psy. 59:1367 (1970). |
| Park et al., Pharm. Res. (1987) 4(6):457-464. |
| PCT/US11/33225 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 7, 2011. |
| Ji, et al., “96-Wellliquid-liquid extraction liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitative determination of ABT-578 in human blood samples” Journal of Chromatography B. 805:67-75 (2004). |
| Levit, et al., “Supercritical C02 Assisted Electrospinning” J. of Supercritical Fluids, 329-333, vol. 31, Issue 3, (Nov. 2004). |
| Handschumacher, R.E. et al., Purine and Pyrimidine Antimetabolites, Chemotherapeutic Agents, pp. 712-732, Ch. XV1-2, 3rd Edition, Edited by J. Holland, et al., Lea and Febigol, publishers. |
| Higuchi, Rate of Release of Medicaments from Ointment Bases Containing Drugs in Suspension, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 50, No. 10, p. 874, Oct. 1961. |
| David Grant, Crystallization Impact on the Nature and Properties of the Crystalline Product, 2003, SSCI, http://www.ssci-inc.com/Information/RecentPublications/ApplicationNotes/CrystallizationImpact/tabid/138/Default.aspx. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14797966.0 dated Dec. 19, 2016. |
| Abreu Filho et al., “Influence of metal alloy and the profile of coronary stents in patients with multivessel coronary disease,” Clinics 2011 ;66(6):985-989. |
| Akoh et al., “One-Stage Synthesis of Raffinose Fatty Acid Polyesters.” Journal Food Science (1987) 52:1570. |
| Albert et al., “Antibiotics tor preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in nonpregnant women,” Cochrane Database System Rev. 3, CD001209 (2004). |
| Au et al., “Methods to improve efficacy of intravesical mitomycin C: Results of a randomized phase III trial,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93 (8 ), 597-604 (2001). |
| Balss et al., “Quantitative spatial distribution of sirolumus and polymers in drugeluting stents using confocal Raman microscopy,” J. of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 258-270 (2007). |
| Belu el al., “Three-Dimensional Compositional Analysis of Drug Eluting Stent Coatings Using Cluster Secondary loan Mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem. 80:624-632 (2008). |
| Belu, et al., “Chemical imaging of drug eluting coatings: Combining surface analysis and confocal Rama microscopy” J. Controlled Release 126: 111-121 (2008). |
| Boneff, “Topical Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis and Premature Ejaculation,” International Urology and Nephrology 4(2):183-186 (1971). |
| Bookbinder et al., “A recombinant human enzyme for enhanced interstitial transport of therapeutics,” Journal of Controlled Release 114:230-241 (2006). |
| Borchert et al., “Prevention and treatment of urinary tract infection with probiotics: Review and research perspective,” Indian Journal Urol. 24(2): 139-144 (2008). |
| Brunstein et al., “Histamine, a vasoactive agent with vascular disrupting potential, improves tumour response by enhancing local drug delivery,” British Journal of Cancer 95:1663-1669 (2006). |
| Bugay et al., “Raman Analysis of Pharmaceuticals,” in “Applications of Vibrational Spectroscopy in Pharmaceutical Research and Development,” Edited by Pivonka, D.E., Chalmers, J.M., Griffiths, P.R. (2007) Wiley and Sons. |
| Cadieux et al., Use of triclosan-eluting ureteral stents in patients with long-term stents, J. Endourol (Epub) (Jun. 19, 2009). |
| Channon et al., “Nitric Oxide Synthase in Atherosclerosis and Vascular Injury: Insights from Experimental Gene Therapy,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 20(8):1873-1881 (2000). |
| Chen et al. Immobilization of heparin on a silicone surface through a heterobifunctional PEG spacer. Biomaterials. Dec. 2005;26(35):7418-24. |
| Chlopek et al., “The influence of carbon fibres on the resorption time and mechanical properties of the lactide-glycolide co-polymer”, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 1355-1368 (2007). |
| Clair and Burks, “Thermoplastic/Melt-Processable Polyimides,” NASA Conf. Pub. #2334 (1984), pp. 337-355. |
| Cohen et al., “Sintering Technique for the Preparation of Polymer Matrices for the Controlled Release of Macromolecules”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 73, No. 8, 1984, p. 1034-1037. |
| Colombo et al. “Selection of Coronary Stents,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 40, No. 6, 2002, p. 1021-1033. |
| CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. 71st ed. David R. Lide, Editor-in-Chief. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press; 1990; 6-140. |
| Cyrus et al., “Intramural delivery of rapamycin with alphavbeta3-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles inhibits stenosis after balloon injury,” Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008; 28:820-826. |
| Derwent-Acc-No. 2004-108578 Abstracting 2004003077; Jan. 8, 2004; 3 pages. |
| Di Mario, C. et al., “Drug-Eluting Bioabsorbable Magnesium Stent,” J. Interventional Cardiology 16(6):391-395 (2004). |
| Di Stasi et al., “Percutaneous sequential bacillus Calmette-Guerin and mitomycin C for panurothelial carcinomatosis,” Can. J. Urol. 12(6):2895-2898 (2005). |
| Domb and Langer, “Polyanhydrides. I. Preparation of High Molecular Weight Polyanhydrides.” J. Polym Sci. 25:3373-3386 (1987). |
| Domingo, C., et al., “Precipication of ultrafine organic crystals from the rapid expansion of supercritical solutions ove a capillary and a frit nozzle”, J. Supercritical Fluids 10:39-55 (1997). |
| Dzik-Jurasz, “Molecular imaging in vivo: an introduction,” The British Journal of Radiology, 76:S98-S109 (2003). |
| Electrostatic Process, Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1999; 7:15-39. |
| Eltze et al., “Imidazoquinolinon, imidazopyridine, and isoquinolindione derivatives as novel and potent inhibitors ofthe poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP): a comparison with standard PARP inhibitors,” Mol. Pharmacal 74(6)1587-1598 (2008). |
| Fibbi et al., “Chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia,” Int J Androl. Jun. 1, 2010;33(3):475-88. |
| Fleischmann et al., “High Expression of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors in the Vascular bed of Urinary Tract Cancers: Promising Candidates for Vascular Targeting Applications.” Jun. 2009, Endocr. Relat. Cancer 16(2):623-33. |
| Froehlich et al., “Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters,” Gastroenterology 108(3):697-704 (1995). |
| Fujiwara et al., “Insulin-like growth factor 1 treatment via hydrogels rescues cochlear hair cells from ischemic injury,” Oct. 29, 2008, NeuroReport 19(16):1585-1588. |
| Fulton et al. Thin Fluoropolymer films and nanoparticle coatings from the rapid expansion of supercritical carbon dioxide solutions with electrostatic collection, Polymer Communication. 2003; 2627-3632. |
| Green et al., “Simple conjugated polymer nanoparticles as biological labels,” Proc Roy Soc A. published online Jun. 24, 2009 doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0181. |
| Griebenow et al., “On Protein Denaturation in Aqueous-Organic Mixtures but not in Pure Organic Solvents,” J. Am Chem Soc., vol. 118. No. 47, 11695-11700 (1996). |
| Hamilos et al., “Ditlerential etlects ofDmg-Eluting Stents on Local Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion.” JACC vol. 51, No. 22,2008, Endothelium and DES Jun. 3, 2008:2123-9. |
| Hartmann et al., “Tubo-ovarian abscess in virginal adolescents: exposure or the underlying etiology,” J. Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 22(3):313-16 (2009). |
| Hasegawa et al., “Nylong 6/Na-montmorillonite nanocomposites prepared by compounding Nylon 6 with Na-montmorillonite slurry,” Polymer 44 (2003) 2933-2937. |
| Hinds, WC. Aerosol Technology, Properties, Behavior and Measurement of Airborne Particles, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 1982; 283-314. |
| Hladik et al., “Can a topical microbicide prevent rectal HIV transmission?” PLoS Med. 5(8):e167 (2008). |
| Iconomidou et al., “Secondary Structure of Chorion Proteins ofthe Teleosatan Fish Dentex dentex by ATR FR-IR and FT-Raman Spectroscopy,” J. of Structural Biology, 132, 112-122(2000). |
| Jackson et al., “Characterization of perivascular poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) films containing paclitaxel” Int. J. ofPhannaceutics, 283:97-109 (2004), incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. |
| Jensen et al., Neointimal hyperplasia after sirollmus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stend implantation in diabetic patients: the randomized diabetes and dmg eluting stent (DiabeDES) intravascular ultrasound trial. European heartjournal (29), pp. 2733-2741. Oct. 2, 2008. Retrieved from the Internet. Retrieved on [ Jul. 17, 2012]. URL: <http :/ /eurheartj .oxfordjournals.org/ content/2 9/22/2 73 3. full. pdf> entire document. |
| Jewell, et al., “Release ofPlasmid DNA from Intravascular Stents Coated with Ultrathin Multilayered Polyelectrolyte Films” Biomacromolecules. 7: 2483-2491 (2006). |
| Johns, H.E, J.R.Cunningham, Thomas, Charles C., Publisher, “The Physics of Radiology,” 1983, Springfield, IL, pp. 133-143. |
| Joner et al. “Site-specific targeting of nanoparticle prednisolone reduces in-stent restenosis in a rabbit model of established atheroma,” Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol.2008 ;28: 1960-1966. |
| Jovanovic et al. “Stabilization of Proteins in Dry Powder Formulations Using Supercritical Fluid Technology,” Pharm. Res. 2004; 21(11). |
| Kazemi et al., “The effect ofbetamethasone gel in reducing sore throat, cough, and hoarseness after laryngo-tracheal intubation,” Middle East J. Anesthesiol. 19(1):197-204 (2007). |
| Kehinde et al., “Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents,” J. Endourol. 18(9):891-896 (2004). |
| PCT/US09/69603 International Search Report dated Nov. 5, 2010. |
| PCT/US10/28195 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 27, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/28195 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 21, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/28253 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 27, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/28253 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2010. |
| PCT/US10/28265 International Report on Patentability dated Sep. 27, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/28265 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 13, 2010. |
| PCT/US10/29494 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 4, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/29494 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/31470 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/31470 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 28, 2011. |
| PCT/US10/42355 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 17, 2012. |
| PCT/US10/42355 Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2010. |
| PCT/US11/22623 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 7, 2012. |
| PCT/US11/22623 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2011. |
| PCT/US11/29667 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2011. |
| PCT/US11/32371 International Report on Patentability dated Oct. 16, 2012. |
| PCT/US11/32371 International Search Report dated Jul. 7, 2011. |
| PCT/US11/44263 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
| PCT/US11/51092 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
| PCT/US11/67921 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 2, 2013. |
| PCT/US11/67921 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 22, 2012. |
| PCT/US12/40040 International Search Report dated Sep. 7, 2012. |
| PCT/US12/60896 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2012. |
| PCT/US13/41466 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
| PCT/US13/42093 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2013. |
| PCT/US13/65777 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 29, 2014. |
| PCT/US14/25017 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
| Perry et al., Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973; 20-106. |
| Plas et al., “Tubers and tumors: rapamycin therapy for benign and malignant tumors”, Curr Opin Cell Bio 21:230-236, (2009). |
| Poling et al., The Properties of Gases and Liquids. McGraw-Hill. 2001; 9:1-9.97. |
| Pontari, “Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in elderly men: toward better understanding and treatment,” Drugs Aging 20(15): 1111-1115 (2003). |
| Pontari, “Inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapy in chronic prostatits,” Urology 60(6Suppl):29-33 (2002). |
| Putkisto, K. et al. “Polymer Coating of Paper Using Dry Surface Treatment—Coating Structure and Performance”, ePlace newsletter, Apr. 12, 2004, vol. 1, No. 8, pp. 1-20. |
| Ranganath et al., “Hydrogel matrix entrapping PLGA-paclitaxel microspheres: drug delivery with near zero-order release and implantability advantages for malignant brain tumour chemotherapy,” Pharm Res (Epub) Jun. 20, 2009). |
| Ranade et al., “Physical characterization of controlled release of paclitaxel from the TAXUS Express2 drug-eluting stent,” J. Biomed Mater. Res. 71 (4):625-634 (2004). |
| Reddy et al., “Inhibition of apoptosis through localized delivery of rapamycin-loaded nanoparticles prevented neointimal hyperplasia and reendothelialized injured artery,” Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1 ;209-216. |
| Sahajanand Medical Technologies (Supralimus Core; Jul. 6, 2008). |
| Schetsky, L. McDonald, “Shape Memory Alloys”, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (3d Ed), John Wiley & Sons 1982, vol. 20 pp. 726-736. |
| Schmidt et al., “A Comparison of the Mechanical Performance Characteristics of Seven Drug-Eluting Stent Systems,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 73:350-360 (2009). |
| Schmidt et al., “In vitro measurement of quality parameters of stent-catheter systems,” Biomed Techn 50 (SI):1505-1506 (2005). |
| Schmidt et al., “New aspects of in vitro testing of arterial stents based on the new European standard,” EN 14299, [online] (2009), [retrieved on Mar. 10, 2001] <http://www.libOev .de/pl/pdf/EN14 299. pdf> (2009). |
| Schmidt et al., “Trackability, Crossability, and Pushability of Coronary Stent Systems—An Experimental Approach,” Biomed Techn 47 (2002), Erg. 1, S. 124-126. |
| Sen et al., “Topical heparin: A promising agent for the prevention of tracheal stenosis in airway surgery,” J. Surg. Res (Epub ahead of print) Feb. 21, 2009. |
| Serruys, Patrick et al., Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease, N. Engl. J. Med., 2001, vol. 344, No. 15, pp. 1117-1124. |
| Shekunov et al., “Crystallization Processes in Pharmaceutical Technology and Drup Delivery Design”, Journal of Crystal Growth 211 (2000), pp. 122-136. |
| Simpson et al., “Hyaluronan and hyaluronidase in genitourinary tumors.” Front Biosci. 13:5664-5680. |
| Smith et al., “Mitomycin C and the endoscopic treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis: Are two applications better than one?” Laryngoscope 119(2):272-283 (2009). |
| Szabadits et al., “Flexibility and trackability of laser cut coronary stent systems,” Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 11 (3 ): 11-18 (2009). |
| Thalmann et al., “Long-term experience with bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients not eligible for surgery,” J Urol. 168(4 Pt 1):1381-1385 (2002). |
| Search Report from Singapore Application No. 2013054127 dated Jul. 26, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Third Party Submission for Application No. JP2015-538086 dated Jun. 4, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170080191 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61226239 | Jul 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13384216 | US | |
| Child | 15366108 | US |
