The present invention relates to an improved drug-impregnated encasement that is configured and adapted to receive a medical implant, and more particularly to a sleeve in one embodiment that is operative to encase orthopedic implants of varying types, sizes, and shapes for delivering a drug to the implantation site.
Colonization of bacteria on the surface of implants often leads to infections. Systemic antibiotics can reduce the risk of infection; however infections can still develop on the surface of implants even in the presence of systemic prophylactic antibiotics. It is not uncommon for orthopedic surgeons to treat implant sites with local antibiotics or other biologically active agents. In some cases the surgeon mixes an antibiotic with PMMA bone cement to prepare a local antibiotic depot. In other cases, to provide a more uniform and easy to use solution, bioresorbable surface coatings or films have been developed that may be applied to orthopedic implants. The coatings may be impregnated with a drug or antibiotic such as gentamicin. Such coatings may be applied to a wide variety of orthopedic implants, such as other tibia or other nails, plates, or screws. In general the coatings are derived from resorbable polymers so that when the drug is depleted, the implant remains while the coating has dissolved away.
One problem with coated implants is that each coated implant represents a new development product in which the coating method, new packaging and sterilization methods must be validated. In addition, each coated implant is the subject of a separate regulatory submission. As a result, a broad portfolio of drug-coated implants is a major undertaking. The logistical challenge is exacerbated by the prospect of using a variety of coatings including materials such as analgesics, antineoplastic agents, bisphosphonates and growth promoting substances.
Given the large number, sizes, and shapes of potential coated products, the regulatory, financial, and logistical burden of providing uncoated and coated implants is enormous. The problem is amplified if one considers additional drugs to use in coatings such as analgesics, antineoplastic agents and growth promoting substances. Moreover, in some of these instances the drug must be deployed into the bone and not the surrounding soft tissue which can constitute the majority of the tissue contacting zones in a typical implant.
Accordingly, there remains a need for an improved drug-release means that can universally accommodate a wide variety of implants and provide a cost-effective solution to the limitations of conventional surface coatings. The invention is generally directed to an improved drug-impregnated encasement. Preferably, the encasement is made from a biologically-compatible material, which is broadly defined herein as any approved FDA material suitable for implantation in a patient. In a preferred embodiment, the encasement is made from, but is not limited to a bioresorbable material. In one preferred embodiment, the encasement is configured as a sleeve. The present invention provides a “one-size fits all” solution to the foregoing coated-implant problem. Instead of creating an inventory of numerous different coated implants, a drug-impregnated sleeve is alternatively provided that preferably can fit a range of different conventional uncoated implants. According to one aspect of the invention, therefore, the drug-impregnated sleeve is configured to advantageously accommodate a wide variety of implant types, shapes, and sizes.
According to another aspect of the invention, the sleeve is implanted into a patient and the drug is dispensed from the sleeve in vivo over time to tissue surrounding the implantation site. In one embodiment, the duration and dosage of the drug delivered to the patient from the sleeve may be controlled by such factors as the choice of sleeve material used, construction of the sleeve, and type and form of drug or combination of drugs and/or drug delivery systems impregnated into the sleeve as further described herein.
According to another aspect of the invention, the drug-impregnated sleeve may advantageously be modified and adapted by the surgeon to custom fit the sleeve to the particular size and shape of the implant needed to be encased. Also advantageously, in one embodiment the sleeve may be modified by the surgeon in the operating room and then slipped over the implant. This approach is beneficial where the surgeon may not be certain of which type or size of an implant, such as a bone plate for example, is required for a bone fixation procedure until the implant site can be accessed during surgery for visual observation and measurement. The surgeon may then select the proper type and size of the implant, and cut the drug-impregnated sleeve to fit.
One or more illustrative drugs or biological agents that may be impregnated into the sleeve includes without limitation antibiotics, antiseptics, analgesics, antineoplastic agents, bisphosphonates, growth factors, peptides, statins, etc. It will be appreciated that any type of drug or biological agent may be incorporated into the sleeve and the invention is not limited by the type used. It should be noted that any reference herein to a “drug” is broadly defined as any medically-related biological agent that may beneficially be incorporated into the sleeve for dispensing to the implantation site of a medical implant. It should be further noted that the invention may be used with any type of medical implant (defined herein to include dental implants) and is expressly not limited to use with orthopedic implants alone.
A preferred embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve for encasing a medical implant generally includes a body made of at least one sheet of a biologically-compatible material, a first end, a second end, and a drug impregnated into the sheet. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. In one embodiment, the drug is dispensed in vivo from the sleeve to an implantation site in a patient after the medical implant is installed. In one embodiment, the body defines an internal cavity that is configured to receive a medical implant. In one embodiment, the body preferably further includes a plurality of apertures extending from the cavity through the body. In one embodiment, the apertures may be round perforations. In another embodiment, the apertures may have a form selected from the group consisting of round holes, elliptical holes, slits, slots, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the medical device may be an orthopedic device, which in some embodiments may be a bone fixation plate or intramedullary nail such as a tibia or femoral nail. Preferably, the first end of the sleeve may be open for receiving the medical implant therethrough and the second end may be closed. In one embodiment, the sleeve may be generally elongate in shape. In another embodiment, the sleeve has a top and bottom, at least a portion of the top or bottom being substantially planar. In another embodiment, the sleeve includes a first edge having a seam closing the first edge and the second end includes a seam closing the second end.
In one embodiment, a resorbable sheet preferably includes a polymer, and more preferably includes caprolactone for adding flexibility and pliability to the sleeve to facilitate sliding the sleeve over the implant and conforming the sleeve to the general shape of the implant. In one embodiment, the sheet may contain different salts of the same drug to control the rate and duration of drug release into the patient. In other embodiments, wherein the sheet may contain two different drugs. In another embodiment, the sleeve is made from at least two sheets of resorbable material that are laminated together. At least one sheet may be microporous in some embodiments. In other embodiments, the at least two sheets may contain different drugs.
Another possible embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve for encasing a medical implant generally includes at least one sheet made of a biologically-compatible material and at least one drug impregnated into the sheet. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. The sheet may contain a plurality of apertures, which in one embodiment may be round perforations or holes. In one embodiment, the sheet may be folded to create a rolled edge, an opposite free edge, a first end, and a second end opposite the first end. In one embodiment, a seam may be formed along the free edge and the second end so that the seam closes the free edge and second end. In one embodiment, the first end defines an opening configured for receiving a medical implant therethrough to be at least partially encased by the sleeve. The sleeve may be sized and configured to conform to the general shape of the types and sizes of medical implants intended to be encased within the sleeve.
A method of forming a drug-impregnated sleeve is also provided. The method may include: providing at least one first generally flat sheet of a biologically-compatible material having at least one drug impregnated into the sheet; forming a plurality of apertures in the sheet; folding the sheet to form a rolled edge, an opposite free edge, a first open end, and a second open end opposite the first end; forming a seam along the free edge to close the free edge; and forming a seam along the second end to close the second end. The seam forming steps for the free edge and second end may be performed in any order. In another embodiment, the method may further include the step of laminating a second generally flat sheet of a biologically resorbable material having at least one drug impregnated onto the first sheet prior to forming the plurality of apertures and folding the sheets. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable.
These foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the remainder of the disclosure, in particular the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, all of which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
The features of the preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawings where like elements are labeled similarly, and in which:
In order that the invention may be understood, preferred embodiments which are given by way of example only, will now be described with reference to the appended drawings. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments are described for convenience of reference and without limitation of the invention to embodiments described herein. The scope of the invention being defined by the claims appended hereto.
Referring to
In one embodiment, sleeve 10 may be formed from a single thin sheet or film 12 of a biologically-compatible material. In a preferred embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. Preferably, sheet 12 is generally flat prior to forming sleeve 10. Sheet 12 in a preferred embodiment is made of a biodegradable resorbable polymer which will dissolve away over time when implanted in vivo and be absorbed into a patient, leaving only the implant behind if the implant is not made of a resorbable material. Alternatively, the implant may also be made of a resorbable material in other embodiments in which case both the implant and sleeve will eventually dissolve. Sheet 12 may be generally thin and substantially planar in a preferred embodiment, which may without limitation have a typical illustrative thickness T in a range from about 0.02 mm to 0.5 mm, and more preferably in a range from about 0.04 mm to 0.1 mm. Any suitable sheet thickness T, however, may be used depending on the intended application, considerations for tear-resistance when inserting an implant into the sheet, drug dispensing duration, etc. Sheet 12 may be made by any suitable means known in the art.
In other embodiments, the drug delivery sleeve 10 may be formed by a textile process such as braiding, knitting, weaving, etc. In one embodiment, the textile sleeve may be fabricated using a fiber with the drug of interest impregnated into it. In one embodiment, the textile may also be formed from a bioresorbable fiber which does not contain a drug impregnated into the fiber. In that case, the textile material may then be coated with a layer of elastic bioresorbable polymer containing the drug of interest. In one embodiment, a textile implant may also be made in the form of a strip of elastic material, knitted woven, etc., with a bioresorbable adhesive coated on one or more sides, so that it can be adhered to the implant. In one embodiment, the drug of interest may be contained in the textile material, or in the adhesive component, or both.
In one embodiment of a flexible sleeve, the resorbable polymer used for sheet 12 preferably contains polycaprolocatone. Polymers containing at least a portion of resorbable, flexible polymers (e.g., a caprolactone) advantageously have properties of good flexibility and strength. In one embodiment, a flexible sleeve (e.g., made from polycaprolocatone) is readily stretchable to conform to the size and shape of the implant, but has sufficient strength to resist tearing during stretching the sleeve over the implant. In one preferred embodiment, sheet 12 containing caprolactone preferably is capable of stretching up to about 100% of its initial un-stretched length or width. Advantageously, a single stretchable sleeve may fit a wide range of implant sizes and/or shapes, and preferably provide a relatively snug fit over the medical implant in a preferred embodiment, with or without slight modification by the surgeon as described herein. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a kit including a limited number of sleeves of different sizes and/or shapes that may be able to fit over a majority of an implant product line.
In one embodiment of a resorbable flexible sleeve 10 having sufficient flexibility, sheet 12 may be composed of polycaprolactone and another resorbable polymer. A preferred illustrative non-limiting range for polycaprolactone content of the sleeve is from about 10% to about 100%, and more preferably from about 20% to 30%. In contrast to some other resorbable polymers typically used for implantation, polycaprolactone degrades relatively slowly in vivo. Accordingly, the caprolactone may be mixed with another polymer having quicker in vivo degradation times to control the overall degradation rate of sheet 12, while still retaining adequate flexibility for stretching sleeve 10 over a medical implant. In one possible embodiment, sheet 12 may be made of 30% polycaprolactone and 70% polylactic acid.
It will be appreciated that any other suitable percentages of polycaprolocatone may be used in sleeve 10. It will further be appreciated that other resorbable polymers or combinations of polymers may be used to make sheet 12, with or without polycaprolactone. For example, the polymer may be comprised of various combinations of any of the FDA approved monomers including glycolide, lactide, trimethylene carbonate, dioxanone and caprolactone. The film or fibers may also include synthetic polymers such as polyethylene oxide or bioresorbable polyurethane. In other embodiments, the film or fibers used to form the drug-impregnated sleeve may also include natural biopolymers such as gelatin, collagen, chitosan, hyaluronate, or alginates. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the type of material, polymers, or combinations of polymers or other types of materials that used to make sheet 12.
In a preferred embodiment, sleeve 10 preferably further contains a plurality of apertures or perforations 14 of any suitable shape (such as substantially round perforations or apertures 14) in one possible embodiment to allow the passage or transport of fluids through the sleeve. Perforations 14 need not be perfectly round, and may be ovoid or elliptical in shape in some embodiments (not shown). The apertures 14 are not limited to round perforations 14. Preferably, perforations 14 extend completely through sheet 12 from an inside surface 11 to an outside surface 13 (see
A preferred illustrative non-limiting range for porosity based on percentage of open area provided by perforations 14 to total surface area of sheet 12 is from about 10% to about 80%, and more preferably from about 20% to about 50%. In one preferred embodiment, perforations 14 provide a porosity of about 20%. Perforations 14 preferably have a diameter of at least about 0.1 mm for satisfactory drug distribution and flushing. In a preferred embodiment, perforations 14 have a diameter of at least about 1.5 mm. Diameters of approximately 0.1 mm or greater are generally considered in the art to represent macroporosity.
Preferably, in one embodiment, perforations 14 are made while sheet 12 is in a generally flat state before being formed into sleeve 10, as further described herein.
Sleeve 10 may be made in one embodiment using a thermally processed, compression molded sheet of degradable polymer. In one embodiment, the drug or other biological agent may be dissolved or dispersed into the polymer while still in solution form. In one embodiment, the polymer solution is then processed into a sheet or film using conventional methods known in the art, perforated, and then fashioned into a sleeve as described herein. Preferably, sheet 12 may be perforated by any suitable technique, such as using a press in one embodiment, while the sheet is still in a generally flat state.
In one embodiment, sleeve 10 may be formed from perforated sheet 12 by folding the sheet over itself to create a longitudinally-extending free edge 15a and a longitudinally-extending rolled or folded edge 15b, as shown in
In other embodiments, sleeve may be formed by methods other than folding and seaming a flat sheet of a biocompatible material. In one embodiment shown in
Apertures or perforations 114 may be formed in tube 112 by any suitable means. In one embodiment, tube 112 may be flattened after it solidifies if the tube material selected has sufficient elasticity. Perforations 114 can then be made by any suitable means, such as without limitation using a press or other device to pierce/puncture the flattened tube. If tube 112 is made of an inelastic material in some embodiments that cannot be readily flattened, perforations 114 may be created by any suitable means to puncture the tube and create the perforations. In another possible embodiment used in conjunction with casting molding tube 112, the mold may be provided with a plurality of posts or pins sized and configured to match the intended final shape and size of perforations 114. As the polymer solution is poured into the mold, the solution will flow around the posts or pins. Perforations 114 will form as the polymer solidifies at the same time that the tubular sleeve is made. Cast-forming perforations 114 in the foregoing manner avoids an additional manufacturing step for making the perforations after tube 112 is made. Tube 112 may be made with either open ends 116, 118 as shown in
As shown in
It is important to note that the polymer constituents can be varied to create a wide range of resorbtion profiles. In addition, alternative film production methods can be employed, particularly if the drug of interest is thermally degraded at the temperatures employed in the compression molding process. Lower temperature film production methods such as but not limited to solvent casting and dip molding on mandrels may alternatively be used.
Sleeve 10 preferably is supplied separately in its own sterile pouch. The surgeon may use sleeve 10 by removing the sleeve from the pouch, and then sliding and stretching the sleeve over an implant 30. Implant 30 may be slid into sleeve 10 all the way into or close to closed end 22 to achieve a relatively snug fit and avoid excessive unsupported loose sleeve material on the end. Sleeve 10 may further be trimmed using a surgical scissors to remove excess sleeve length by cutting end 21 off close to the end of the implant 30. It should be noted that although a somewhat snug fit between sleeve 10 and implant 30 may be desired in some circumstances to avoid excessively loose material that might interfere with installing implant 30 at the surgical site; a tight fit is not required in all instances. Similar techniques described above may be used by the surgeon to modify sleeve 10 for custom fitting the sleeve to the particular size and shape of the implant needed to be encased. The implant encased within the sleeve may then be implanted into the patient and fixed in place using standard methods. Advantageously, the surgeon will be able to deploy a drug from a variety of implants via the sleeve, but medical device companies will avoid the onerous logistics of developing and maintaining large uncoated and coated implant inventories, with one or more drugs depending on the condition of the patient or indication to be treated.
Although medical implant 30 is shown as being a straight elongate plate, it will be appreciated that numerous different shapes and types of medical implants may be used with the invention without limitation. Accordingly, sleeve 10 may be used with devices other than bone plates, such as without limitation non-orthopedic implants (e.g., stents, pacemakers, dental implants, etc.) and other orthopedic implants (e.g., tibia nails, femoral nails, spinal implants, etc.). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the surgeon may combine two or more sleeves 10 of the same or different sizes and shapes for an implant with a more complex shape. For example, two or more sleeves 10 may be combined without limitation for use with bone plates or other types of medical implants having an L-shape, T-shape, X-shape, H-shape or other types and shapes of implants. It should be recognized that the implant need not be completely encased by sleeve 10 in all cases to effectively deliver a drug or other biological agent to surrounding tissue. Therefore, a variety of implant shapes may be accommodated by using a combination of sleeves 10.
With reference to
In another possible embodiment, sleeve 10 may be placed over autograft or allograft bone prior to implantation for drug dispensing and/or to use the sleeve as a bone graft containment device. For example, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is often mixed with a carrier such as ChronOS granules (available from Synthes, Inc. of West Chester, Pa.) or other forms. In one embodiment, the surgeon may fill the sleeve with the ChronOS-BMA mixture to prevent migration of the mixture away from the implant site. Some examples of other suitable carrier material include a calcium phosphate cancellous bone substitutes such as Vitoss® (r) (available from Orthovita of Malvern, Pa.), or Conduit™ (r) (available, from DePuy, Inc. of Raynham, Mass.).
In one embodiment, the resorbtion time of the polymer sleeve and concomitant drug dispensing rates can be manipulated from days to years. The polymer chemistry and type of polymer used provide a wide range of possible drug delivery kinetics and polymer resorbtion times. In addition, resorbtion times and drug delivery rates can be manipulated by the thickness of sheets used to construct the polymer sleeve.
Other techniques may be employed for controlling the delivery rate and duration of delivery for drugs or biological agents from the sleeve. For example, in one alternative embodiment shown in
In other embodiments, a drug or biological agent may be delivered at different rates and durations by incorporating different salts of one or more types of drug into sleeve 10 or 50. In one embodiment, sheet 12 of sleeve 10 may contain different salts of the same drug, each of which will have different solubilities in body fluid. Therefore, the drug release rate will vary according to the solubility of the particular salt. In one embodiment, this would allow the elution profile of the drug from the sheet 12 to be controlled by changing the ratios of different salts of the same drug present in the sheet. In another embodiment, sheet 12 may contain different salts of two or more different drugs or biological agents. In alternative embodiments of a sleeve 50 having multiple layers of sheets 12, 52, sheet 12 may contain a different salt of the same drug than sheet 52.
Referring to
It will be appreciated that various other suitable shapes, combinations, and patterns of deformable apertures such as holes, slits, and slots may be used so long as the polymer sheet is capable of being expanded or stretched in one or more directions. It should be recognized that the deformable apertures may be used with flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid sheets of polymer where a highly stretchable sleeve is desired. The deformable apertures may advantageous be used for encasing irregularly shaped implants which are not totally linear in profile.
While the description and drawings represent preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the accompanying claims, hi particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, sizes, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be used with many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, sizes, materials, and components used in the practice of the invention, which are particularly adapted to specific needs and operating requirements, without departing from the principles of the present invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims, and not limited to the foregoing description or embodiments.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/417,409, filed Jan. 27, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/503,594, filed on Oct. 1, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,579,260, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/089,574, filed Apr. 8, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,900,620, which is national stage 371 application of PCT/US2006/040038, filed Oct. 12, 2006, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/726,808, filed Oct. 13, 2005, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3155095 | Brown | Nov 1964 | A |
3719736 | Woodrupp | Mar 1973 | A |
3949037 | Volent | Apr 1976 | A |
4148871 | Pitt et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4297993 | Harle | Nov 1981 | A |
4587268 | Pfirrmann | May 1986 | A |
4605414 | Czajka | Aug 1986 | A |
4605730 | Shalaby et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4659700 | Jackson | Apr 1987 | A |
4730726 | Holzwarth | Mar 1988 | A |
4774091 | Yamahira et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4863444 | Bloemer | Sep 1989 | A |
4888023 | Averill et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5021241 | Yamahira et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5084050 | Draenert | Jan 1992 | A |
5093319 | Higham et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100668 | Edelman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104266 | Daryoush et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5147400 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5260066 | Wood et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268178 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281221 | Tadych | Jan 1994 | A |
5324519 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326356 | Della Valle et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5383928 | Scott et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5456721 | Legrand | Oct 1995 | A |
5458653 | Davidson | Oct 1995 | A |
5462563 | Shearer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468253 | Bezwada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5489305 | Morgan | Feb 1996 | A |
5507814 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521193 | Flynn et al. | May 1996 | A |
5549676 | Johnson | Aug 1996 | A |
5567431 | Vert et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571204 | Nies | Nov 1996 | A |
5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656605 | Hansson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5679299 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713904 | Errico et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725570 | Heath | Mar 1998 | A |
5755720 | Mikhail | May 1998 | A |
5795584 | Totakura et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798113 | Dionne et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800519 | Sandock | Sep 1998 | A |
5800544 | Demopulos et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800828 | Dionne et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800829 | Dionne et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824088 | Kirsch | Oct 1998 | A |
5834001 | Dionne et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855906 | McClay | Jan 1999 | A |
5869077 | Dionne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871767 | Dionne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873906 | Lau et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874099 | Dionne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876432 | Lau et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5919225 | Lau et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919235 | Husson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947893 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955095 | Gentile et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984926 | Jones | Nov 1999 | A |
6001123 | Lau | Dec 1999 | A |
6013104 | Kampner | Jan 2000 | A |
6015429 | Lau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017362 | Lau | Jan 2000 | A |
6060640 | Pauley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063395 | Markkula et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071567 | Castelli et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083523 | Dionne et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117442 | Markkula et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143029 | Rippstein | Nov 2000 | A |
6143033 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165202 | Kokish et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180052 | Ouellette et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193746 | Strecker | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221097 | Wang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232869 | Choi | May 2001 | B1 |
6235869 | Roby et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248112 | Gambale et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254627 | Freidberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258125 | Paul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277084 | Abele et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280411 | Lennox | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287291 | Bigus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287331 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287628 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287638 | Castelli et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299894 | Markkula et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306166 | Barry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322804 | Dionne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331186 | Wang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331188 | Lau et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337088 | Gentile et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350284 | Tormala et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383190 | Preissman | May 2002 | B1 |
6419694 | Sandock | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432141 | Stocks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443980 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6451003 | Prosl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451050 | Rudakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468300 | Freidberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476079 | Jukarainen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482235 | Lambrecht et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491720 | Vallana et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494898 | Roby et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497709 | Heath | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503556 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6503954 | Bhat et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517570 | Lau et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520984 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545097 | Pinchuk et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547812 | Hu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554863 | Paul et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6569180 | Sirhan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6592569 | Bigus et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592885 | Phaneuf et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596296 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602290 | Esnouf et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607544 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632235 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641587 | Scribner et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645241 | Strecker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660038 | Boyer, II et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666880 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6692498 | Niiranen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706058 | Hierlemann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713119 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716216 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6716444 | Castro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719773 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726691 | Osorio et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746483 | Bojarski et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749626 | Bhat et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6759054 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767369 | Boyer, II et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790224 | Gerberding | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790228 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
RE38614 | Synthes | Oct 2004 | E |
6818247 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827743 | Eisermann et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840770 | McDevitt | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855770 | Pinchuk et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863530 | McDevitt | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863692 | Meulink | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883520 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884427 | Barrows | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6899719 | Reiley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908624 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6946143 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953560 | Castro et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6960351 | Dionne et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979341 | Scribner et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981991 | Ferree | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986788 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001390 | Gebhardt et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7014659 | Boyer, II et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025791 | Levine et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037332 | Kutryk et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7041308 | Shalaby et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056577 | Bruce et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7070613 | Weber et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087082 | Paul et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087087 | Boyer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101392 | Heath | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108717 | Freidberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115146 | Boyer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122058 | Levine et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131986 | Sirhan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137993 | Acosta et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147656 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153306 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153307 | Scribner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7168605 | Walak | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169405 | Trieu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175873 | Roorda et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7182779 | Acosta et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192448 | Ferree | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198047 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208008 | Clarke | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238168 | Sirhan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247313 | Roorda et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252671 | Scribner et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261720 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267694 | Levine et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7270668 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279008 | Brown et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279175 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294146 | Chew et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296998 | Bartee et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300456 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300465 | Paul et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309350 | Landreville et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311727 | Mazumder et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7329285 | Levine et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347873 | Paul et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347875 | Levine et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351255 | Andreas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357812 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402172 | Chin et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407512 | Bojarski et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7458990 | Chieng | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465318 | Sennett et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473277 | Boyer, II et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491234 | Palasis et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503936 | Trieu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504125 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7550012 | Lavelle | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553539 | Bruce et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578834 | Abdou | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7608114 | Levine et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611481 | Cleary et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618432 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618448 | Schmitz et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618647 | Weber et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622146 | Roorda et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622530 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7666216 | Hogendijk et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678068 | Levine et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682647 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686781 | Vinten-Johansen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691401 | Castro et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695446 | Levine et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698111 | Abrahao et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704545 | Kantor | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731750 | Bojarski et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740657 | Brown et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744620 | Pedersen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758535 | Levine et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758642 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758881 | Dugan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766861 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766973 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771382 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785615 | Dave et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789915 | Lavelle et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803183 | Kutryk et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7988732 | Bojarski et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8900620 | Fulmer | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9381683 | Armbruster et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9579260 | Fulmer | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20010039456 | Boyer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020055749 | Esnouf et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062147 | Yang | May 2002 | A1 |
20020187260 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030088307 | Shulze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093111 | Ken | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107149 | Yang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149466 | Gerberding | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040093058 | Cottone et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093062 | Glastra | May 2004 | A1 |
20040146546 | Gravett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040225359 | Bojarski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267347 | Cervantes | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267354 | Ringeisen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050019404 | Sung et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050129732 | Rubsamen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159805 | Weber et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181977 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209629 | Kerr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209704 | Maspero et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246021 | Ringeisen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261782 | Hoganson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278011 | Peckham | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060093646 | Cima et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060234061 | Buckel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259122 | Eliseev | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263355 | Quan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276906 | Hoag et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286137 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070038299 | Stone et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070118211 | Gazza | May 2007 | A1 |
20070141103 | Benedict et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142892 | Dave et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198040 | Buevich et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213801 | Kutryk et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255422 | Wei et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080033548 | Xuenong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057096 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097570 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107711 | Shelokov | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112892 | Veenstra et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125847 | Krever et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128315 | Buevich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132922 | Buevich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132992 | Bates et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195218 | Jones | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241212 | Moses et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262630 | Fulmer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012595 | Seliktar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018640 | State | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062899 | Dang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069904 | Picha | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076449 | Geis et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076508 | Weinans et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081276 | Alsberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081278 | De Graaff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092654 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118817 | Sandhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130167 | Shelton et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143851 | Paul, Jr. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192474 | Wei et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192609 | Klabunde et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198197 | Bischoff et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227948 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090233045 | Slama et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234453 | Steinberg | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090289395 | Chou | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004729 | Chew et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028390 | Cleary et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100028402 | Dobrovolskaia et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070015 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100211153 | Cook et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222826 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228333 | Drasler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233238 | Tenney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241214 | Shaked et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100247600 | Xia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249783 | Trieu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110144688 | Reiss et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110244047 | Asari et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268781 | Cleek et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282362 | Bojarski et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120010636 | Boey et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016388 | Houard et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027833 | Zilberman | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130129807 | Devore et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130289621 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004202878 | Jul 2004 | AU |
1206353 | Jan 1999 | CN |
1638743 | Jul 2005 | CN |
101402736 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101437571 | May 2009 | CN |
101912663 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102958557 | Mar 2013 | CN |
3939363 | Jun 1991 | DE |
0013638 | Jul 1980 | EP |
0323800 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0371819 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0523926 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0539751 | May 1993 | EP |
0578998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0604697 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0737703 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1216717 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1272131 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1294323 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1374817 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1395303 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1482996 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1812090 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1820463 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1463463 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1913903 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2052700 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2080603 | Jul 2009 | EP |
1181333 | Jun 1959 | FR |
1183333 | Jul 1959 | FR |
02-121652 | May 1990 | JP |
03-085179 | Apr 1991 | JP |
04-221538 | Aug 1992 | JP |
07-044936 | May 1995 | JP |
07-313586 | Dec 1995 | JP |
08-024347 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08-224297 | Sep 1996 | JP |
09-173364 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-201330 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2002-058741 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003-527193 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2008-531699 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008-224297 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-535700 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009-511196 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-240783 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2011-216178 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013-005984 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2234419 | Aug 2004 | RU |
2300792 | Jun 2007 | RU |
77539 | Oct 2008 | RU |
683207 | Mar 1985 | SU |
9851240 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9951171 | Oct 1999 | WO |
9962416 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0112107 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0132100 | May 2001 | WO |
0170135 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176514 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0197721 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0251463 | Jul 2002 | WO |
0322165 | Mar 2003 | WO |
0359213 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004010854 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2005009499 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005049105 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006023261 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006050106 | May 2006 | WO |
2006108520 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007047420 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007053022 | May 2007 | WO |
2007092417 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008121816 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2010135440 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2013013172 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Louis et al., Resorbable Mesh as a Containment System in Reconstruction of the Atrophic Mandible Fracture, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp. 719-723, Jun. 2004. (Year: 2004). |
Definition of “textile” accessed online at https://www.merriam-webster.com on Jun. 16, 2020. (Year: 2020). |
Zhang et al., Biodegradable Controlled Antibiotic Release Devices for Osteomyelitis: Optimization of Release Properties, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Sep. 1994, vol. 46, Issue 9. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2006/40038, dated Sep. 25, 2007, 6 pages. |
Von Plocki et al., “Biodegradable Sleeves for Metal Implants to Prevent Implant-Associated Infection: An Experimental In Vivo Study in Sheep”, Vet Surg., Apr. 2012, 41(3), 410-421, Epub Jan. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Application Filed on Oct. 13, 2005 by Kerr et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/726,808. |
Trampuz et al., “Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections Associated with Fracture-Fixation Devices”, Injury, May 2006, 37, Suppl 2, S59-S66. |
Stile et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Injectable Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-Based Hydrogels That Support Tissue Formation in Vitro”, Macromolecules, 32, (1999), 7370-7379. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680037881.8 dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
Schmidt et al., Antibiotic in vivo/in vitro release, histocompatibility and biodegradation of gentamicin implants based on lactic acid polymers and copolymers, Nov. 1995, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 37, Issues 1-2, pp. 83-84. |
Pineros-Fernandez, A. et al., “CAPROSYN*, Another Major Advance in Synthetic Monofilament Absorbable Suture”, Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2004, 14(5), 359-368. |
Pandey et al., Characterization of In-vitro Release of Gentamicin from Biodegradable Polymer Thin Films Microstructure—Function Relationship by Confocal Raman Microscopy, Apr. 2015, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. |
Office action dated Oct. 18, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-535700. |
Mingeot-Leclercq et al., “Aminoglycosides: Nephrotoxicity”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, 43 (5), 1003-1012. |
Machine Translation of DE 3939363 A1, Jun. 1991, 9 pages. |
Lucke, M, et al., “Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in rats”, Bone; vol. 32, (2003), 521-531. |
Kaneko, Y., et al., “Synthesis and Swelling—deswelling kinetics of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels grafted with LCST modulated polymers”, Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition 10(11) (1999),1079-1091. |
Japanese Application No. 2002-506661, Official Notice of Reason for the Final Rejection dated Jul. 11, 2008, (w/ English Translation), 4 pgs. |
Japanese Application No. 2002-506661, Notice of the Reason for the Rejection dated Feb. 27, 2008, (w/ English Translation), 7 pgs. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/071708: International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2013, 22 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, Written Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2007, 6 Pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, International Search Reoort dated Sep. 25, 2007, 3 Pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 2008, 7 Pgs. |
Huang et al., On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems, Jun. 2001, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 73, Issues 2-3, pp. 121-136. |
Gupta et al., Cefoperazone sodium impregnated polycaprolactone composite implant for osteomyelitis, Indian J. Pharm Sci, Jul.-Aug. 2009, 71(4) 377-381. |
Gosau et al., “Release of Gentamicin Sulphate From Biodegradable PLGA-Implants Produced by Hot Melt Extrusion”, Pharmazie, 2010. |
Fredenberg et al., The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems?A review, Aug. 2011, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 415, Issues 1-2, pp. 34-52. |
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-535700 dated May 24, 2012. |
European Patent Application No. 04750971.6, Communication dated Jun. 12, 2008, 5 pages. |
Dorta et al., Potential applications of PLGA film-implants in modulating in vitro drugs release, Nov. 2002, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 248, Issues 1-2, pp. 149-156. |
Darouiche, R. 0., “Treatment of Infections Associated with Surgical Implants”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Apr. 2004, 350(14), 1422-1429. |
Bailey, T. C. et al., “A Meta-Analysis of Extended-Interval Dosing Versus Multiple Daily Dosing of Aminoglycosides”, Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 1997, 24, 786-795. |
Aviv et al., “Gentamicin-Loaded Bioresorbable Films for Prevention of Bacterial Infections Associated with Orthopedic Implants”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part 1, Mar. 2007, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180085564 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60726808 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15417409 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 15726634 | US | |
Parent | 14503594 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 15417409 | US | |
Parent | 12089574 | US | |
Child | 14503594 | US |