Drug-impregnated encasement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10814112
  • Patent Number
    10,814,112
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 6, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 27, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A drug-impregnated sleeve for encasing a medical implant is provided. In one embodiment, the sleeve may include a body made of a biologically-compatible material that defines an internal cavity configured to receive the medical implant. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. The body may include a plurality of apertures, such as perforations or holes, extending from the cavity through the body. The sleeve may further include a first end, a second end, and a drug impregnated into the resorbable sheet. In one possible embodiment, the first end of the sleeve may be open for receiving the medical implant therethrough and the second end may be closed. The implant may be encased in the sleeve and implanted into a patient from which the drug is dispensed in vivo over time to tissue surrounding the implantation site. In one embodiment, the body is made from at least one sheet of a biologically-compatible material.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved drug-impregnated encasement that is configured and adapted to receive a medical implant, and more particularly to a sleeve in one embodiment that is operative to encase orthopedic implants of varying types, sizes, and shapes for delivering a drug to the implantation site.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Colonization of bacteria on the surface of implants often leads to infections. Systemic antibiotics can reduce the risk of infection; however infections can still develop on the surface of implants even in the presence of systemic prophylactic antibiotics. It is not uncommon for orthopedic surgeons to treat implant sites with local antibiotics or other biologically active agents. In some cases the surgeon mixes an antibiotic with PMMA bone cement to prepare a local antibiotic depot. In other cases, to provide a more uniform and easy to use solution, bioresorbable surface coatings or films have been developed that may be applied to orthopedic implants. The coatings may be impregnated with a drug or antibiotic such as gentamicin. Such coatings may be applied to a wide variety of orthopedic implants, such as other tibia or other nails, plates, or screws. In general the coatings are derived from resorbable polymers so that when the drug is depleted, the implant remains while the coating has dissolved away.


One problem with coated implants is that each coated implant represents a new development product in which the coating method, new packaging and sterilization methods must be validated. In addition, each coated implant is the subject of a separate regulatory submission. As a result, a broad portfolio of drug-coated implants is a major undertaking. The logistical challenge is exacerbated by the prospect of using a variety of coatings including materials such as analgesics, antineoplastic agents, bisphosphonates and growth promoting substances.


Given the large number, sizes, and shapes of potential coated products, the regulatory, financial, and logistical burden of providing uncoated and coated implants is enormous. The problem is amplified if one considers additional drugs to use in coatings such as analgesics, antineoplastic agents and growth promoting substances. Moreover, in some of these instances the drug must be deployed into the bone and not the surrounding soft tissue which can constitute the majority of the tissue contacting zones in a typical implant.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, there remains a need for an improved drug-release means that can universally accommodate a wide variety of implants and provide a cost-effective solution to the limitations of conventional surface coatings. The invention is generally directed to an improved drug-impregnated encasement. Preferably, the encasement is made from a biologically-compatible material, which is broadly defined herein as any approved FDA material suitable for implantation in a patient. In a preferred embodiment, the encasement is made from, but is not limited to a bioresorbable material. In one preferred embodiment, the encasement is configured as a sleeve. The present invention provides a “one-size fits all” solution to the foregoing coated-implant problem. Instead of creating an inventory of numerous different coated implants, a drug-impregnated sleeve is alternatively provided that preferably can fit a range of different conventional uncoated implants. According to one aspect of the invention, therefore, the drug-impregnated sleeve is configured to advantageously accommodate a wide variety of implant types, shapes, and sizes.


According to another aspect of the invention, the sleeve is implanted into a patient and the drug is dispensed from the sleeve in vivo over time to tissue surrounding the implantation site. In one embodiment, the duration and dosage of the drug delivered to the patient from the sleeve may be controlled by such factors as the choice of sleeve material used, construction of the sleeve, and type and form of drug or combination of drugs and/or drug delivery systems impregnated into the sleeve as further described herein.


According to another aspect of the invention, the drug-impregnated sleeve may advantageously be modified and adapted by the surgeon to custom fit the sleeve to the particular size and shape of the implant needed to be encased. Also advantageously, in one embodiment the sleeve may be modified by the surgeon in the operating room and then slipped over the implant. This approach is beneficial where the surgeon may not be certain of which type or size of an implant, such as a bone plate for example, is required for a bone fixation procedure until the implant site can be accessed during surgery for visual observation and measurement. The surgeon may then select the proper type and size of the implant, and cut the drug-impregnated sleeve to fit.


One or more illustrative drugs or biological agents that may be impregnated into the sleeve includes without limitation antibiotics, antiseptics, analgesics, antineoplastic agents, bisphosphonates, growth factors, peptides, statins, etc. It will be appreciated that any type of drug or biological agent may be incorporated into the sleeve and the invention is not limited by the type used. It should be noted that any reference herein to a “drug” is broadly defined as any medically-related biological agent that may beneficially be incorporated into the sleeve for dispensing to the implantation site of a medical implant. It should be further noted that the invention may be used with any type of medical implant (defined herein to include dental implants) and is expressly not limited to use with orthopedic implants alone.


A preferred embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve for encasing a medical implant generally includes a body made of at least one sheet of a biologically-compatible material, a first end, a second end, and a drug impregnated into the sheet. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. In one embodiment, the drug is dispensed in vivo from the sleeve to an implantation site in a patient after the medical implant is installed. In one embodiment, the body defines an internal cavity that is configured to receive a medical implant. In one embodiment, the body preferably further includes a plurality of apertures extending from the cavity through the body. In one embodiment, the apertures may be round perforations. In another embodiment, the apertures may have a form selected from the group consisting of round holes, elliptical holes, slits, slots, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the medical device may be an orthopedic device, which in some embodiments may be a bone fixation plate or intramedullary nail such as a tibia or femoral nail. Preferably, the first end of the sleeve may be open for receiving the medical implant therethrough and the second end may be closed. In one embodiment, the sleeve may be generally elongate in shape. In another embodiment, the sleeve has a top and bottom, at least a portion of the top or bottom being substantially planar. In another embodiment, the sleeve includes a first edge having a seam closing the first edge and the second end includes a seam closing the second end.


In one embodiment, a resorbable sheet preferably includes a polymer, and more preferably includes caprolactone for adding flexibility and pliability to the sleeve to facilitate sliding the sleeve over the implant and conforming the sleeve to the general shape of the implant. In one embodiment, the sheet may contain different salts of the same drug to control the rate and duration of drug release into the patient. In other embodiments, wherein the sheet may contain two different drugs. In another embodiment, the sleeve is made from at least two sheets of resorbable material that are laminated together. At least one sheet may be microporous in some embodiments. In other embodiments, the at least two sheets may contain different drugs.


Another possible embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve for encasing a medical implant generally includes at least one sheet made of a biologically-compatible material and at least one drug impregnated into the sheet. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. The sheet may contain a plurality of apertures, which in one embodiment may be round perforations or holes. In one embodiment, the sheet may be folded to create a rolled edge, an opposite free edge, a first end, and a second end opposite the first end. In one embodiment, a seam may be formed along the free edge and the second end so that the seam closes the free edge and second end. In one embodiment, the first end defines an opening configured for receiving a medical implant therethrough to be at least partially encased by the sleeve. The sleeve may be sized and configured to conform to the general shape of the types and sizes of medical implants intended to be encased within the sleeve.


A method of forming a drug-impregnated sleeve is also provided. The method may include: providing at least one first generally flat sheet of a biologically-compatible material having at least one drug impregnated into the sheet; forming a plurality of apertures in the sheet; folding the sheet to form a rolled edge, an opposite free edge, a first open end, and a second open end opposite the first end; forming a seam along the free edge to close the free edge; and forming a seam along the second end to close the second end. The seam forming steps for the free edge and second end may be performed in any order. In another embodiment, the method may further include the step of laminating a second generally flat sheet of a biologically resorbable material having at least one drug impregnated onto the first sheet prior to forming the plurality of apertures and folding the sheets. In one embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable.


These foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the remainder of the disclosure, in particular the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, all of which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features of the preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawings where like elements are labeled similarly, and in which:



FIG. 1 is a top view of one embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve according to principles of the present invention and a medical implant in the form of a bone plate that is insertable into the sleeve;



FIG. 2 is a side cross-section view of the sleeve of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a side cross-section view of an alternative embodiment of the sleeve of FIG. 1 containing multiple layers of a sheet or film;



FIG. 4 is a top view of the sleeve of FIG. 1 with the bone plate partially inserted into the sleeve;



FIG. 5 is a side view of an alternative embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve having an open-ended pocket formed on either end of the sleeve;



FIG. 6 is a top view of an alternative embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve having deformable apertures in the form of slots;



FIG. 7 is a top view of an alternative embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve having deformable apertures in the form of slits;



FIG. 8 is a top view of an alternative embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve having deformable apertures in the form of slits and holes;



FIG. 9 is a top view of an alternative embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve having deformable apertures in the form of x-shaped slits; and



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of an alternative tubular drug-impregnated sleeve.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In order that the invention may be understood, preferred embodiments which are given by way of example only, will now be described with reference to the appended drawings. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments are described for convenience of reference and without limitation of the invention to embodiments described herein. The scope of the invention being defined by the claims appended hereto.



FIG. 1 shows a drug-impregnated sleeve 10 according to principles of the present invention placed adjacent a medical device such as orthopedic implant 30, which in one non-limiting embodiment shown may be an elongate bone plate. FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view taken through sleeve 10 in FIG. 1.


Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a preferred embodiment of a drug-impregnated sleeve 10 may include an elongate body 20 having two ends 21, 22. Ends 21, 22 may be either opened or closed. In one embodiment, end 21 is preferably an open end through which an implant may be inserted into sleeve 10. Opposite end 22 preferably is closed end in one embodiment so that the implant may be snugly abutted against the closed end to achieve a better fit and prevent the sleeve from sliding in relation to the implant when the implant is affixed at the surgical site in the patient.


In one embodiment, sleeve 10 may be formed from a single thin sheet or film 12 of a biologically-compatible material. In a preferred embodiment, the biologically-compatible material is bioresorbable. Preferably, sheet 12 is generally flat prior to forming sleeve 10. Sheet 12 in a preferred embodiment is made of a biodegradable resorbable polymer which will dissolve away over time when implanted in vivo and be absorbed into a patient, leaving only the implant behind if the implant is not made of a resorbable material. Alternatively, the implant may also be made of a resorbable material in other embodiments in which case both the implant and sleeve will eventually dissolve. Sheet 12 may be generally thin and substantially planar in a preferred embodiment, which may without limitation have a typical illustrative thickness T in a range from about 0.02 mm to 0.5 mm, and more preferably in a range from about 0.04 mm to 0.1 mm. Any suitable sheet thickness T, however, may be used depending on the intended application, considerations for tear-resistance when inserting an implant into the sheet, drug dispensing duration, etc. Sheet 12 may be made by any suitable means known in the art.


In other embodiments, the drug delivery sleeve 10 may be formed by a textile process such as braiding, knitting, weaving, etc. In one embodiment, the textile sleeve may be fabricated using a fiber with the drug of interest impregnated into it. In one embodiment, the textile may also be formed from a bioresorbable fiber which does not contain a drug impregnated into the fiber. In that case, the textile material may then be coated with a layer of elastic bioresorbable polymer containing the drug of interest. In one embodiment, a textile implant may also be made in the form of a strip of elastic material, knitted woven, etc., with a bioresorbable adhesive coated on one or more sides, so that it can be adhered to the implant. In one embodiment, the drug of interest may be contained in the textile material, or in the adhesive component, or both.


In one embodiment of a flexible sleeve, the resorbable polymer used for sheet 12 preferably contains polycaprolocatone. Polymers containing at least a portion of resorbable, flexible polymers (e.g., a caprolactone) advantageously have properties of good flexibility and strength. In one embodiment, a flexible sleeve (e.g., made from polycaprolocatone) is readily stretchable to conform to the size and shape of the implant, but has sufficient strength to resist tearing during stretching the sleeve over the implant. In one preferred embodiment, sheet 12 containing caprolactone preferably is capable of stretching up to about 100% of its initial un-stretched length or width. Advantageously, a single stretchable sleeve may fit a wide range of implant sizes and/or shapes, and preferably provide a relatively snug fit over the medical implant in a preferred embodiment, with or without slight modification by the surgeon as described herein. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a kit including a limited number of sleeves of different sizes and/or shapes that may be able to fit over a majority of an implant product line.


In one embodiment of a resorbable flexible sleeve 10 having sufficient flexibility, sheet 12 may be composed of polycaprolactone and another resorbable polymer. A preferred illustrative non-limiting range for polycaprolactone content of the sleeve is from about 10% to about 100%, and more preferably from about 20% to 30%. In contrast to some other resorbable polymers typically used for implantation, polycaprolactone degrades relatively slowly in vivo. Accordingly, the caprolactone may be mixed with another polymer having quicker in vivo degradation times to control the overall degradation rate of sheet 12, while still retaining adequate flexibility for stretching sleeve 10 over a medical implant. In one possible embodiment, sheet 12 may be made of 30% polycaprolactone and 70% polylactic acid.


It will be appreciated that any other suitable percentages of polycaprolocatone may be used in sleeve 10. It will further be appreciated that other resorbable polymers or combinations of polymers may be used to make sheet 12, with or without polycaprolactone. For example, the polymer may be comprised of various combinations of any of the FDA approved monomers including glycolide, lactide, trimethylene carbonate, dioxanone and caprolactone. The film or fibers may also include synthetic polymers such as polyethylene oxide or bioresorbable polyurethane. In other embodiments, the film or fibers used to form the drug-impregnated sleeve may also include natural biopolymers such as gelatin, collagen, chitosan, hyaluronate, or alginates. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the type of material, polymers, or combinations of polymers or other types of materials that used to make sheet 12.


In a preferred embodiment, sleeve 10 preferably further contains a plurality of apertures or perforations 14 of any suitable shape (such as substantially round perforations or apertures 14) in one possible embodiment to allow the passage or transport of fluids through the sleeve. Perforations 14 need not be perfectly round, and may be ovoid or elliptical in shape in some embodiments (not shown). The apertures 14 are not limited to round perforations 14. Preferably, perforations 14 extend completely through sheet 12 from an inside surface 11 to an outside surface 13 (see FIG. 2). Perforations 14 advantageously provide more even distribution of the drug or biological agent to adjacent tissue and bone as the material leaches out of the polymer than a sleeve without such perforations. In addition to benefiting drug distribution, perforations 14 also eliminates a dead space between the implant and sleeve where debris or material may become and remain trapped causing possible problems for the patient. Therefore, such debris may be flushed out and away through perforations 14 by bodily fluid flow.


A preferred illustrative non-limiting range for porosity based on percentage of open area provided by perforations 14 to total surface area of sheet 12 is from about 10% to about 80%, and more preferably from about 20% to about 50%. In one preferred embodiment, perforations 14 provide a porosity of about 20%. Perforations 14 preferably have a diameter of at least about 0.1 mm for satisfactory drug distribution and flushing. In a preferred embodiment, perforations 14 have a diameter of at least about 1.5 mm. Diameters of approximately 0.1 mm or greater are generally considered in the art to represent macroporosity.


Preferably, in one embodiment, perforations 14 are made while sheet 12 is in a generally flat state before being formed into sleeve 10, as further described herein.


Sleeve 10 may be made in one embodiment using a thermally processed, compression molded sheet of degradable polymer. In one embodiment, the drug or other biological agent may be dissolved or dispersed into the polymer while still in solution form. In one embodiment, the polymer solution is then processed into a sheet or film using conventional methods known in the art, perforated, and then fashioned into a sleeve as described herein. Preferably, sheet 12 may be perforated by any suitable technique, such as using a press in one embodiment, while the sheet is still in a generally flat state.


In one embodiment, sleeve 10 may be formed from perforated sheet 12 by folding the sheet over itself to create a longitudinally-extending free edge 15a and a longitudinally-extending rolled or folded edge 15b, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Free edge 15a and ends 21, 22 thus initially may have a double layer or thickness T of sheet 12 where the sheet overlaps itself (see FIG. 2). Rolled edge 15b may have a generally slightly rounded, curved shape or a crease in transverse cross-section comprising a single layer or thickness T of sheet 12 (see also FIG. 2). The sheet forming edge 15a and preferably end 22 may then be joined together (e.g., by heat fusion welding) in one embodiment to create a fused seam 16 along edge 15a and end 22. In one embodiment, sleeve 12 thus formed defines an internal cavity 23 configured for receiving an implant. Preferably, in one embodiment, end 21 is not joined together to define and create opening 18 in end 21 for inserting the implant into sleeve 10. It should be noted that any suitable technique may be used to form a seal and close free edge 15a and end 22, such as chemical fusion or welding, use of biologically compatible adhesives, etc. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the use of heat fusion techniques.


In other embodiments, sleeve may be formed by methods other than folding and seaming a flat sheet of a biocompatible material. In one embodiment shown in FIG. 10, a sleeve 100 may be formed in the shape of a tube 112 having apertures or perforations 114 and two ends 116, 118. Preferably, in one embodiment, tube 112 is seamless, hi one possible embodiment, tube 100 may be made of polymer. A polymeric tube 112 may be formed in some possible embodiments by pour-casting or dip-molding processes. The pour-casting method preferably includes pouring a polymer solution into a tubular-shaped mold, allowing the polymer to solidify, and removing the formed tubular sleeve 112 from the mold. The dip-molding process preferably includes in one embodiment dipping a rod-like mandrel into a container of polymer solution, withdrawing the mandrel from the solution with the polymer clinging to the mandrel, solidifying the polymer, and removing the formed tubular sleeve 112 from the mandrel. The polymer solution used in the dipping process preferably has a suitable viscosity to allow the polymer to adhere to the mandrel. A dip-molding process that may be used in forming sleeve 112 is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20050209629, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the mandrel may be dipped more than once to increase the thickness of the tubular sleeve 112. In other embodiments, the mandrel may be dipped into two or more containers of the same or different types of polymer solutions to create a multi-layered tube 112. In some embodiments, the two or more of the same or different polymer solutions may include the same drug, different salts of the same drug, different drugs, or any combination thereof. Accordingly, tubular sleeve 112 may be made with multiple polymer layers that allow the type of drug dispensed and the dispending rate and duration to be controlled as required for a particular application.


Apertures or perforations 114 may be formed in tube 112 by any suitable means. In one embodiment, tube 112 may be flattened after it solidifies if the tube material selected has sufficient elasticity. Perforations 114 can then be made by any suitable means, such as without limitation using a press or other device to pierce/puncture the flattened tube. If tube 112 is made of an inelastic material in some embodiments that cannot be readily flattened, perforations 114 may be created by any suitable means to puncture the tube and create the perforations. In another possible embodiment used in conjunction with casting molding tube 112, the mold may be provided with a plurality of posts or pins sized and configured to match the intended final shape and size of perforations 114. As the polymer solution is poured into the mold, the solution will flow around the posts or pins. Perforations 114 will form as the polymer solidifies at the same time that the tubular sleeve is made. Cast-forming perforations 114 in the foregoing manner avoids an additional manufacturing step for making the perforations after tube 112 is made. Tube 112 may be made with either open ends 116, 118 as shown in FIG. 10, or in some embodiments either end 116, or 118 may be formed as a closed end (not shown). A sleeve 10 made in the form of a seamless tube may generally have better strength than a folded and seamed sleeve in some embodiments.


As shown in FIG. 2, before inserting a medical implant into sleeve 10, one embodiment of the sleeve may have a generally flattened oval or elliptical shape in a transverse cross section to the length of the sleeve defined as extending in the direction of edge 15a. Accordingly, the top 17t and bottom 17b of sleeve 10 may include generally planar or flat portions which in one possible embodiment will generally conform to the shape of complementary flat implants 30 as shown to eliminate unnecessary excess loose sleeve material (after the implant is inserted) that may form undesirable excessively large pockets between the sleeve and implant wherein debris may become entrapped in vivo. In other embodiments (not shown), sheet 12 may be folded and sleeve 10 formed so that almost a tubular shape may be created.


It is important to note that the polymer constituents can be varied to create a wide range of resorbtion profiles. In addition, alternative film production methods can be employed, particularly if the drug of interest is thermally degraded at the temperatures employed in the compression molding process. Lower temperature film production methods such as but not limited to solvent casting and dip molding on mandrels may alternatively be used.


Sleeve 10 preferably is supplied separately in its own sterile pouch. The surgeon may use sleeve 10 by removing the sleeve from the pouch, and then sliding and stretching the sleeve over an implant 30. Implant 30 may be slid into sleeve 10 all the way into or close to closed end 22 to achieve a relatively snug fit and avoid excessive unsupported loose sleeve material on the end. Sleeve 10 may further be trimmed using a surgical scissors to remove excess sleeve length by cutting end 21 off close to the end of the implant 30. It should be noted that although a somewhat snug fit between sleeve 10 and implant 30 may be desired in some circumstances to avoid excessively loose material that might interfere with installing implant 30 at the surgical site; a tight fit is not required in all instances. Similar techniques described above may be used by the surgeon to modify sleeve 10 for custom fitting the sleeve to the particular size and shape of the implant needed to be encased. The implant encased within the sleeve may then be implanted into the patient and fixed in place using standard methods. Advantageously, the surgeon will be able to deploy a drug from a variety of implants via the sleeve, but medical device companies will avoid the onerous logistics of developing and maintaining large uncoated and coated implant inventories, with one or more drugs depending on the condition of the patient or indication to be treated.


Although medical implant 30 is shown as being a straight elongate plate, it will be appreciated that numerous different shapes and types of medical implants may be used with the invention without limitation. Accordingly, sleeve 10 may be used with devices other than bone plates, such as without limitation non-orthopedic implants (e.g., stents, pacemakers, dental implants, etc.) and other orthopedic implants (e.g., tibia nails, femoral nails, spinal implants, etc.). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the surgeon may combine two or more sleeves 10 of the same or different sizes and shapes for an implant with a more complex shape. For example, two or more sleeves 10 may be combined without limitation for use with bone plates or other types of medical implants having an L-shape, T-shape, X-shape, H-shape or other types and shapes of implants. It should be recognized that the implant need not be completely encased by sleeve 10 in all cases to effectively deliver a drug or other biological agent to surrounding tissue. Therefore, a variety of implant shapes may be accommodated by using a combination of sleeves 10.


With reference to FIG. 5, an alternative embodiment of a sleeve 40 is shown that is designed so that the drug is released from only one side of the implant to direct the drug into bone or the nearby soft tissue as desired. This sleeve 40 embodiment includes an open center portion 42 with only a single thickness of sheet 12 and a pocket 44 formed on either end portion 46. This open configuration leaves one side of implant 30 exposed between pockets 44 and may be supplied to the surgeon in the form shown or created by the surgeon in the operating room by cutting the center part out of sleeve 10 (shown in FIG. 1).


In another possible embodiment, sleeve 10 may be placed over autograft or allograft bone prior to implantation for drug dispensing and/or to use the sleeve as a bone graft containment device. For example, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is often mixed with a carrier such as ChronOS granules (available from Synthes, Inc. of West Chester, Pa.) or other forms. In one embodiment, the surgeon may fill the sleeve with the ChronOS-BMA mixture to prevent migration of the mixture away from the implant site. Some examples of other suitable carrier material include a calcium phosphate cancellous bone substitutes such as Vitoss® (r) (available from Orthovita of Malvern, Pa.), or Conduit™ (r) (available, from DePuy, Inc. of Raynham, Mass.).


In one embodiment, the resorbtion time of the polymer sleeve and concomitant drug dispensing rates can be manipulated from days to years. The polymer chemistry and type of polymer used provide a wide range of possible drug delivery kinetics and polymer resorbtion times. In addition, resorbtion times and drug delivery rates can be manipulated by the thickness of sheets used to construct the polymer sleeve.


Other techniques may be employed for controlling the delivery rate and duration of delivery for drugs or biological agents from the sleeve. For example, in one alternative embodiment shown in FIG. 3, sleeve 50 may be formed from multiple layers of polymer sheets having the same or different compositions of polymers. Sleeve 50 may include two sheets 12 and 52 which in one embodiment, have been laminated together, by any conventional method known in the art, and may include perforations 50 as shown. In some embodiments, both sheets 12 and 52 need not each contain perforations 14 if not desirable. In one embodiment, a drug may be impregnated into each sheet 12, 52, but the sleeve may be designed to release the drug at different rates. In one embodiment, this may be accomplished by making one or more sheets 12, 52 microporous, to allow more rapid water or fluid penetration into the film, and more rapid elution of the drug. Non-microporous layers would entrap the drug more effectively, causing it to elute at a slower rate. In other embodiments having sheets 12 and 52 made from different polymers, one sheet could be more hydrophillic and swell at a faster rate by fluid absorption than the other sheet, thereby releasing the drug more rapidly. Alternatively, one of the sheets 12 or 52 may be made from a polymer that degrades in vivo more quickly than the other sheet. In some embodiments, the same drug or biological agent may be incorporated in sheets 12 and 52. In other embodiments, a different drug may be contained in sheets 12 and 52. Accordingly, for example, a first type of drug may be delivered from sheet 12 at a given rate and duration while a second different or the same drug may be delivered form sheet 52 at a given rate and duration which may be different.


In other embodiments, a drug or biological agent may be delivered at different rates and durations by incorporating different salts of one or more types of drug into sleeve 10 or 50. In one embodiment, sheet 12 of sleeve 10 may contain different salts of the same drug, each of which will have different solubilities in body fluid. Therefore, the drug release rate will vary according to the solubility of the particular salt. In one embodiment, this would allow the elution profile of the drug from the sheet 12 to be controlled by changing the ratios of different salts of the same drug present in the sheet. In another embodiment, sheet 12 may contain different salts of two or more different drugs or biological agents. In alternative embodiments of a sleeve 50 having multiple layers of sheets 12, 52, sheet 12 may contain a different salt of the same drug than sheet 52.


Referring to FIGS. 6-9, alternative embodiments of sleeves 10 or 50 may be produced from a polymer sheet or film which is not completely flexible or elastic to allow expansion or stretching over an implant, but may be made to expand to fit a number of different size implants by providing a pattern of deformable apertures such as holes and/or slits/slots cut into the sleeves at various orientations. The holes and/or slits/slots would deform, and allow the sleeve to stretch over the implant. FIG. 6 shows one possible embodiment of a polymer sheet 60 including longitudinally-extending slots 62. This arrangement allows sheet 60 to stretch across its width (running horizontally) in the direction of the stretch arrows shown. FIG. 7 shows one possible embodiment of a polymer sheet 70 including longitudinally-extending slits 72. This arrangement allows sheet 70 to stretch across its width (running horizontally) in the direction of the stretch arrows shown. FIG. 8 shows one possible embodiment of a polymer sheet 80 including a combination of longitudinal slits 82 and holes 84 with the slits being oriented diagonally on the sheet in the embodiment shown. This arrangement allows sheet 80 to stretch across its width (running horizontally) and length (running vertically) in the direction of the stretch arrows shown. FIG. 9 shows one possible embodiment of a polymer sheet 90 including X-shaped slits 92. This arrangement allows sheet 90 to stretch across its width (running horizontally) and length (running vertically) in the direction of the stretch arrows shown. In alternative embodiments of sheet 90, X-shaped slots may be provided in lieu of slits.


It will be appreciated that various other suitable shapes, combinations, and patterns of deformable apertures such as holes, slits, and slots may be used so long as the polymer sheet is capable of being expanded or stretched in one or more directions. It should be recognized that the deformable apertures may be used with flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid sheets of polymer where a highly stretchable sleeve is desired. The deformable apertures may advantageous be used for encasing irregularly shaped implants which are not totally linear in profile.


While the description and drawings represent preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the accompanying claims, hi particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, sizes, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be used with many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, sizes, materials, and components used in the practice of the invention, which are particularly adapted to specific needs and operating requirements, without departing from the principles of the present invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims, and not limited to the foregoing description or embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. A bone graft containment system comprising: a biocompatible sleeve comprising a textile body made of one or more polymer fibers, the sleeve including a top and a bottom,a first end open for receiving a bone graft material, anda second end, the second end including a seam closing the second end,the sleeve defining an internal cavity configured to contain the bone graft material,and a bone graft material disposed within the cavity.
  • 2. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the sleeve comprises a biocompatible sheet.
  • 3. The bone graft containment system according to claim 2, wherein the sheet has a thickness in the range of about 0.02 mm to about 0.5 mm.
  • 4. The bone graft containment system according to claim 2, wherein the sheet has a thickness in the range of about 0.04 mm to about 0.1 mm.
  • 5. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the textile body further comprises a bioresorbable coating layer on the one or more polymer fibers.
  • 6. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the sleeve comprises a resorbable polymer or a mixture of resorbable polymers.
  • 7. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the sleeve further comprises a first edge, the first edge having a seam closing the first edge.
  • 8. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the bone graft material comprises bone marrow aspirate.
  • 9. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the bone graft material comprises autograft material.
  • 10. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the bone graft material comprises allograft material.
  • 11. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the bone graft material comprises calcium phosphate bone substitute material.
  • 12. The bone graft containment system according to claim 1, wherein the sleeve further includes one or more drugs impregnated in the sleeve.
  • 13. The bone graft containment system according to claim 12, wherein the one or more drugs includes an antibiotic, antiseptic, analgesic, antineoplastic agent, bisphosphonate, growth factor, peptide, statin, or combination thereof.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/417,409, filed Jan. 27, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/503,594, filed on Oct. 1, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,579,260, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/089,574, filed Apr. 8, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,900,620, which is national stage 371 application of PCT/US2006/040038, filed Oct. 12, 2006, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/726,808, filed Oct. 13, 2005, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.

US Referenced Citations (333)
Number Name Date Kind
3155095 Brown Nov 1964 A
3719736 Woodrupp Mar 1973 A
3949037 Volent Apr 1976 A
4148871 Pitt et al. Apr 1979 A
4297993 Harle Nov 1981 A
4587268 Pfirrmann May 1986 A
4605414 Czajka Aug 1986 A
4605730 Shalaby et al. Aug 1986 A
4659700 Jackson Apr 1987 A
4730726 Holzwarth Mar 1988 A
4774091 Yamahira et al. Sep 1988 A
4863444 Bloemer Sep 1989 A
4888023 Averill et al. Dec 1989 A
5021241 Yamahira et al. Jun 1991 A
5084050 Draenert Jan 1992 A
5093319 Higham et al. Mar 1992 A
5100668 Edelman et al. Mar 1992 A
5104266 Daryoush et al. Apr 1992 A
5147400 Kaplan et al. Sep 1992 A
5260066 Wood et al. Nov 1993 A
5268178 Calhoun et al. Dec 1993 A
5281221 Tadych Jan 1994 A
5324519 Dunn et al. Jun 1994 A
5326356 Della Valle et al. Jul 1994 A
5383928 Scott et al. Jan 1995 A
5456721 Legrand Oct 1995 A
5458653 Davidson Oct 1995 A
5462563 Shearer et al. Oct 1995 A
5468253 Bezwada et al. Nov 1995 A
5489305 Morgan Feb 1996 A
5507814 Gilbert et al. Apr 1996 A
5521193 Flynn et al. May 1996 A
5549676 Johnson Aug 1996 A
5567431 Vert et al. Oct 1996 A
5571204 Nies Nov 1996 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5656605 Hansson et al. Aug 1997 A
5679299 Gilbert et al. Oct 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5713904 Errico et al. Feb 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5725570 Heath Mar 1998 A
5755720 Mikhail May 1998 A
5795584 Totakura et al. Aug 1998 A
5798113 Dionne et al. Aug 1998 A
5800519 Sandock Sep 1998 A
5800544 Demopulos et al. Sep 1998 A
5800828 Dionne et al. Sep 1998 A
5800829 Dionne et al. Sep 1998 A
5824088 Kirsch Oct 1998 A
5834001 Dionne et al. Nov 1998 A
5855906 McClay Jan 1999 A
5869077 Dionne et al. Feb 1999 A
5871767 Dionne et al. Feb 1999 A
5873906 Lau et al. Feb 1999 A
5874099 Dionne et al. Feb 1999 A
5876432 Lau et al. Mar 1999 A
5919225 Lau et al. Jul 1999 A
5919235 Husson et al. Jul 1999 A
5947893 Agrawal et al. Sep 1999 A
5955095 Gentile et al. Sep 1999 A
5984926 Jones Nov 1999 A
6001123 Lau Dec 1999 A
6013104 Kampner Jan 2000 A
6015429 Lau et al. Jan 2000 A
6017362 Lau Jan 2000 A
6060640 Pauley et al. May 2000 A
6063395 Markkula et al. May 2000 A
6071567 Castelli et al. Jun 2000 A
6083523 Dionne et al. Jul 2000 A
6117442 Markkula et al. Sep 2000 A
6143029 Rippstein Nov 2000 A
6143033 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6165202 Kokish et al. Dec 2000 A
6165210 Lau et al. Dec 2000 A
6180052 Ouellette et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193746 Strecker Feb 2001 B1
6221097 Wang et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232869 Choi May 2001 B1
6235869 Roby et al. May 2001 B1
6248112 Gambale et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254627 Freidberg Jul 2001 B1
6258125 Paul et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277084 Abele et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280411 Lennox Aug 2001 B1
6287291 Bigus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287331 Heath Sep 2001 B1
6287628 Hossainy et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287638 Castelli et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290721 Heath Sep 2001 B1
6299894 Markkula et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306166 Barry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6322804 Dionne et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331186 Wang et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331188 Lau et al. Dec 2001 B1
6337088 Gentile et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350284 Tormala et al. Feb 2002 B1
6379381 Hossainy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383190 Preissman May 2002 B1
6419694 Sandock Jul 2002 B1
6432141 Stocks et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443980 Wang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447522 Gambale et al. Sep 2002 B2
6451003 Prosl et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451050 Rudakov et al. Sep 2002 B1
6468300 Freidberg Oct 2002 B1
6476079 Jukarainen et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482235 Lambrecht et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491720 Vallana et al. Dec 2002 B1
6494898 Roby et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497709 Heath Dec 2002 B1
6503556 Harish et al. Jan 2003 B2
6503954 Bhat et al. Jan 2003 B1
6517570 Lau et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520984 Garrison et al. Feb 2003 B1
6545097 Pinchuk et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547812 Hu Apr 2003 B1
6554863 Paul et al. Apr 2003 B2
6569180 Sirhan et al. May 2003 B1
6592569 Bigus et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592885 Phaneuf et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596296 Nelson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6602290 Esnouf et al. Aug 2003 B2
6607544 Boucher et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613072 Lau et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632235 Weikel et al. Oct 2003 B2
6641587 Scribner et al. Nov 2003 B2
6645241 Strecker Nov 2003 B1
6660038 Boyer, II et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666880 Chiu et al. Dec 2003 B1
6692498 Niiranen et al. Feb 2004 B1
6706058 Hierlemann et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713119 Hossainy et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716216 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 B1
6716444 Castro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719773 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726691 Osorio et al. Apr 2004 B2
6746483 Bojarski et al. Jun 2004 B1
6749626 Bhat et al. Jun 2004 B1
6759054 Chen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767369 Boyer, II et al. Jul 2004 B2
6790224 Gerberding Sep 2004 B2
6790228 Hossainy et al. Sep 2004 B2
RE38614 Synthes Oct 2004 E
6818247 Chen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6827743 Eisermann et al. Dec 2004 B2
6840770 McDevitt Jan 2005 B2
6855770 Pinchuk et al. Feb 2005 B2
6863530 McDevitt Mar 2005 B2
6863692 Meulink Mar 2005 B2
6883520 Lambrecht et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884427 Barrows Apr 2005 B1
6899719 Reiley et al. May 2005 B2
6908624 Hossainy et al. Jun 2005 B2
6946143 Kim et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953560 Castro et al. Oct 2005 B1
6960351 Dionne et al. Nov 2005 B2
6979341 Scribner et al. Dec 2005 B2
6981991 Ferree Jan 2006 B2
6986788 Paul et al. Jan 2006 B2
7001390 Gebhardt et al. Feb 2006 B2
7014659 Boyer, II et al. Mar 2006 B2
7025791 Levine et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037332 Kutryk et al. May 2006 B2
7041308 Shalaby et al. May 2006 B2
7056577 Bruce et al. Jun 2006 B1
7070613 Weber et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087082 Paul et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087087 Boyer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101392 Heath Sep 2006 B2
7108717 Freidberg Sep 2006 B2
7115146 Boyer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122058 Levine et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131986 Sirhan et al. Nov 2006 B2
7137993 Acosta et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147656 Andreas et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153306 Ralph et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153307 Scribner et al. Dec 2006 B2
7168605 Walak Jan 2007 B2
7169405 Trieu Jan 2007 B2
7175873 Roorda et al. Feb 2007 B1
7182779 Acosta et al. Feb 2007 B2
7192448 Ferree Mar 2007 B2
7198047 Lambrecht et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208008 Clarke Apr 2007 B2
7238168 Sirhan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247313 Roorda et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252671 Scribner et al. Aug 2007 B2
7261720 Stevens et al. Aug 2007 B2
7267694 Levine et al. Sep 2007 B2
7270668 Andreas et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279008 Brown et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279175 Chen et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294146 Chew et al. Nov 2007 B2
7296998 Bartee et al. Nov 2007 B2
7300456 Andreas et al. Nov 2007 B2
7300465 Paul et al. Nov 2007 B2
7309350 Landreville et al. Dec 2007 B2
7311727 Mazumder et al. Dec 2007 B2
7329285 Levine et al. Feb 2008 B2
7347873 Paul et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347875 Levine et al. Mar 2008 B2
7351255 Andreas Apr 2008 B2
7357812 Andreas et al. Apr 2008 B2
7402172 Chin et al. Jul 2008 B2
7407512 Bojarski et al. Aug 2008 B2
7458990 Chieng Dec 2008 B2
7465318 Sennett et al. Dec 2008 B2
7473277 Boyer, II et al. Jan 2009 B2
7491234 Palasis et al. Feb 2009 B2
7503936 Trieu Mar 2009 B2
7504125 Pacetti et al. Mar 2009 B1
7550012 Lavelle Jun 2009 B2
7553539 Bruce et al. Jun 2009 B2
7578834 Abdou Aug 2009 B2
7608114 Levine et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611481 Cleary et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618432 Pedersen et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618448 Schmitz et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618647 Weber et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622146 Roorda et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622530 Pinchuk et al. Nov 2009 B2
7666216 Hogendijk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678068 Levine et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682647 Hossainy et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686781 Vinten-Johansen Mar 2010 B2
7691401 Castro et al. Apr 2010 B2
7695446 Levine et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698111 Abrahao et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704545 Kantor Apr 2010 B2
7731750 Bojarski et al. Jun 2010 B2
7740657 Brown et al. Jun 2010 B2
7744620 Pedersen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7758535 Levine et al. Jul 2010 B2
7758642 Bojarski et al. Jul 2010 B2
7758881 Dugan Jul 2010 B2
7766861 Levine et al. Aug 2010 B2
7766973 Levine et al. Aug 2010 B2
7771382 Levine et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785615 Dave et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789915 Lavelle et al. Sep 2010 B2
7803183 Kutryk et al. Sep 2010 B2
7988732 Bojarski et al. Aug 2011 B2
8900620 Fulmer Dec 2014 B2
9381683 Armbruster et al. Jul 2016 B2
9579260 Fulmer Feb 2017 B2
20010039456 Boyer et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020055749 Esnouf et al. May 2002 A1
20020062147 Yang May 2002 A1
20020187260 Sheppard et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030088307 Shulze et al. May 2003 A1
20030093111 Ken May 2003 A1
20030107149 Yang et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149466 Gerberding Aug 2003 A1
20040093058 Cottone et al. May 2004 A1
20040093062 Glastra May 2004 A1
20040146546 Gravett et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040225359 Bojarski et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040267347 Cervantes Dec 2004 A1
20040267354 Ringeisen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050019404 Sung et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050129732 Rubsamen Jun 2005 A1
20050159805 Weber et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050181977 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050209629 Kerr et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209704 Maspero et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050246021 Ringeisen Nov 2005 A1
20050261782 Hoganson Nov 2005 A1
20050278011 Peckham Dec 2005 A1
20060093646 Cima et al. May 2006 A1
20060234061 Buckel et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259122 Eliseev Nov 2006 A1
20060263355 Quan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276906 Hoag et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060286137 Sandhu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070038299 Stone et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070118211 Gazza May 2007 A1
20070141103 Benedict et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142892 Dave et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070198040 Buevich et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213801 Kutryk et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255422 Wei et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080033548 Xuenong et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080057096 Ibsen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097570 Thornton et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080107711 Shelokov May 2008 A1
20080112892 Veenstra et al. May 2008 A1
20080125847 Krever et al. May 2008 A1
20080128315 Buevich et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080132922 Buevich et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080132992 Bates et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080195218 Jones Aug 2008 A1
20080241212 Moses et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262630 Fulmer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012595 Seliktar et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018640 State Jan 2009 A1
20090062899 Dang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069904 Picha Mar 2009 A1
20090076449 Geis et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076508 Weinans et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081276 Alsberg et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081278 De Graaff et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090092654 de Juan, Jr. et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118817 Sandhu et al. May 2009 A1
20090130167 Shelton et al. May 2009 A1
20090143851 Paul, Jr. Jun 2009 A1
20090192474 Wei et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192609 Klabunde et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198197 Bischoff et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090227948 Chen et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090233045 Slama et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234453 Steinberg Sep 2009 A1
20090289395 Chou Nov 2009 A1
20100004729 Chew et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100028390 Cleary et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100028402 Dobrovolskaia et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070015 Schneider et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100211153 Cook et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100222826 Bojarski et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228333 Drasler et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100233238 Tenney et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241214 Shaked et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247600 Xia et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249783 Trieu Sep 2010 A1
20110144688 Reiss et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110244047 Asari et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110268781 Cleek et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282362 Bojarski et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120010636 Boey et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016388 Houard et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027833 Zilberman Feb 2012 A1
20130129807 Devore et al. May 2013 A1
20130289621 Agarwal et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (76)
Number Date Country
2004202878 Jul 2004 AU
1206353 Jan 1999 CN
1638743 Jul 2005 CN
101402736 Apr 2009 CN
101437571 May 2009 CN
101912663 Dec 2010 CN
102958557 Mar 2013 CN
3939363 Jun 1991 DE
0013638 Jul 1980 EP
0323800 Jul 1989 EP
0371819 Jun 1990 EP
0523926 Jan 1993 EP
0539751 May 1993 EP
0578998 Jan 1994 EP
0604697 Jul 1994 EP
0737703 Oct 1996 EP
1216717 Jun 2002 EP
1272131 Jan 2003 EP
1294323 Mar 2003 EP
1374817 Jan 2004 EP
1395303 Mar 2004 EP
1482996 Nov 2005 EP
1812090 Aug 2007 EP
1820463 Aug 2007 EP
1463463 Feb 2008 EP
1913903 Apr 2008 EP
2052700 Apr 2009 EP
2080603 Jul 2009 EP
1181333 Jun 1959 FR
1183333 Jul 1959 FR
02-121652 May 1990 JP
03-085179 Apr 1991 JP
04-221538 Aug 1992 JP
07-044936 May 1995 JP
07-313586 Dec 1995 JP
08-024347 Jan 1996 JP
08-224297 Sep 1996 JP
09-173364 Jul 1997 JP
09-201330 Aug 1997 JP
2002-058741 Feb 2002 JP
2003-527193 Sep 2003 JP
2008-531699 Aug 2008 JP
2008-224297 Sep 2008 JP
2008-535700 Sep 2008 JP
2009-511196 Mar 2009 JP
2009-240783 Oct 2009 JP
2011-216178 Oct 2011 JP
2013-005984 Jan 2013 JP
2234419 Aug 2004 RU
2300792 Jun 2007 RU
77539 Oct 2008 RU
683207 Mar 1985 SU
9851240 Nov 1998 WO
9951171 Oct 1999 WO
9962416 Dec 1999 WO
0012147 Mar 2000 WO
0112107 Feb 2001 WO
0132100 May 2001 WO
0170135 Sep 2001 WO
0176514 Oct 2001 WO
0197721 Dec 2001 WO
0251463 Jul 2002 WO
0322165 Mar 2003 WO
0359213 Jul 2003 WO
2004010854 Feb 2004 WO
2005009499 Feb 2005 WO
2005049105 Jun 2005 WO
2006023261 Mar 2006 WO
2006050106 May 2006 WO
2006108520 Oct 2006 WO
2007047420 Apr 2007 WO
2007053022 May 2007 WO
2007092417 Aug 2007 WO
2008121816 Oct 2008 WO
2010135440 Nov 2010 WO
2013013172 Jan 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Louis et al., Resorbable Mesh as a Containment System in Reconstruction of the Atrophic Mandible Fracture, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp. 719-723, Jun. 2004. (Year: 2004).
Definition of “textile” accessed online at https://www.merriam-webster.com on Jun. 16, 2020. (Year: 2020).
Zhang et al., Biodegradable Controlled Antibiotic Release Devices for Osteomyelitis: Optimization of Release Properties, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Sep. 1994, vol. 46, Issue 9.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2006/40038, dated Sep. 25, 2007, 6 pages.
Von Plocki et al., “Biodegradable Sleeves for Metal Implants to Prevent Implant-Associated Infection: An Experimental In Vivo Study in Sheep”, Vet Surg., Apr. 2012, 41(3), 410-421, Epub Jan. 12, 2012.
U.S. Application Filed on Oct. 13, 2005 by Kerr et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/726,808.
Trampuz et al., “Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections Associated with Fracture-Fixation Devices”, Injury, May 2006, 37, Suppl 2, S59-S66.
Stile et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Injectable Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-Based Hydrogels That Support Tissue Formation in Vitro”, Macromolecules, 32, (1999), 7370-7379.
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680037881.8 dated Dec. 23, 2011.
Schmidt et al., Antibiotic in vivo/in vitro release, histocompatibility and biodegradation of gentamicin implants based on lactic acid polymers and copolymers, Nov. 1995, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 37, Issues 1-2, pp. 83-84.
Pineros-Fernandez, A. et al., “CAPROSYN*, Another Major Advance in Synthetic Monofilament Absorbable Suture”, Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2004, 14(5), 359-368.
Pandey et al., Characterization of In-vitro Release of Gentamicin from Biodegradable Polymer Thin Films Microstructure—Function Relationship by Confocal Raman Microscopy, Apr. 2015, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.
Office action dated Oct. 18, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-535700.
Mingeot-Leclercq et al., “Aminoglycosides: Nephrotoxicity”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, 43 (5), 1003-1012.
Machine Translation of DE 3939363 A1, Jun. 1991, 9 pages.
Lucke, M, et al., “Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in rats”, Bone; vol. 32, (2003), 521-531.
Kaneko, Y., et al., “Synthesis and Swelling—deswelling kinetics of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels grafted with LCST modulated polymers”, Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition 10(11) (1999),1079-1091.
Japanese Application No. 2002-506661, Official Notice of Reason for the Final Rejection dated Jul. 11, 2008, (w/ English Translation), 4 pgs.
Japanese Application No. 2002-506661, Notice of the Reason for the Rejection dated Feb. 27, 2008, (w/ English Translation), 7 pgs.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/071708: International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2013, 22 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, Written Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2007, 6 Pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, International Search Reoort dated Sep. 25, 2007, 3 Pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US06/40038, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 2008, 7 Pgs.
Huang et al., On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems, Jun. 2001, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 73, Issues 2-3, pp. 121-136.
Gupta et al., Cefoperazone sodium impregnated polycaprolactone composite implant for osteomyelitis, Indian J. Pharm Sci, Jul.-Aug. 2009, 71(4) 377-381.
Gosau et al., “Release of Gentamicin Sulphate From Biodegradable PLGA-Implants Produced by Hot Melt Extrusion”, Pharmazie, 2010.
Fredenberg et al., The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems?A review, Aug. 2011, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 415, Issues 1-2, pp. 34-52.
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-535700 dated May 24, 2012.
European Patent Application No. 04750971.6, Communication dated Jun. 12, 2008, 5 pages.
Dorta et al., Potential applications of PLGA film-implants in modulating in vitro drugs release, Nov. 2002, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 248, Issues 1-2, pp. 149-156.
Darouiche, R. 0., “Treatment of Infections Associated with Surgical Implants”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Apr. 2004, 350(14), 1422-1429.
Bailey, T. C. et al., “A Meta-Analysis of Extended-Interval Dosing Versus Multiple Daily Dosing of Aminoglycosides”, Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 1997, 24, 786-795.
Aviv et al., “Gentamicin-Loaded Bioresorbable Films for Prevention of Bacterial Infections Associated with Orthopedic Implants”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part 1, Mar. 2007, 10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180085564 A1 Mar 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60726808 Oct 2005 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15417409 Jan 2017 US
Child 15726634 US
Parent 14503594 Oct 2014 US
Child 15417409 US
Parent 12089574 US
Child 14503594 US