The present invention generally relates to agricultural equipment and machines, particularly, cotton harvesting machines (cotton pickers); and, more particularly, to cotton picker systems and apparatus for detecting overloads, overruns, or slow downs, at the picking drum.
In conventional cotton pickers, for each row of cotton to be picked, there is provided a picker drum, which supports at least one vertical rotor assembly, which assembly consists of a plurality of radially extending, cotton-picking spindles. Each rotor, and its associated drive gears, are protected against damage by a slip clutch, which removes drive from the rotor when an overload occurs, e.g. when debris becomes lodged in the drum. That is, a rotor shaft extends downwardly through the slippable portion, or inner hub, at the center of the slip clutch, and then through the drum. The rotor drive gear is mounted to the external, driven portion, i.e. housing, of the slip clutch. As the slip clutch is driven by a conventional power source, via the drive gear, the rotor also rotates on its vertical axis, in tandem with the clutch.
During the overloaded condition, ratcheting or clicking sounds are generated as the cams and lobes on the drive and driven portions, of the gear train and clutch respectively, slip past each other. Absent a slippage detection system, an operator, seated in the cab of the cotton picker, must rely upon hearing the slipping sounds. However, he may not immediately hear the sounds because cabs tend to isolate the operator from the noise of the picker unit. This inability to immediately recognize the overload condition can result in damage to the drum and its drive, as well as reduced productivity from the loss of cotton.
Before now, the slippage detection systems measured the speed differential between the rotor assemblies of the picking drums. The drum rotor assembly normally comprises two rotor shafts per picking drum. Each rotor shaft of each drum, has a speed sensor, therefore there are 12 sensors on a 6 row machine. Each sensor measures the revolutions per minute (RPM) from its respective shaft and sends the signal to a computer processing unit that calculates the speed differential between the two shafts. A microprocessor captures the speed differential at each rotor assembly and the resulting average differential speed after comparing all six assemblies. The processor sends a fault warning if any rotor speed and/or speed differential deviates from the average by more than ±10%.
There are many factors influencing this fault warning. Typically, the shaft must spin a minimum number of RPMs before the computer processing unit can detect any degree of change. Most computer processors need a certain minimum number of cycles and time to process and validate signals from the speed sensor. Since damage continues to occur, during at least that minimum number of cycles, and during the processor cycle validation time, the delayed detection or late warning of the slippage leads to, inter alia, aggravation of the deterioration of various fine-tuned components of the harvester machines.
Identifying and repairing the damage to these fine-tuned components may exceed the troubleshooting capabilities of the average operator.
In a cotton-picking unit of a cotton harvester, or in other agricultural or construction equipment or in machine tools there can be an overrunning clutch having an input driven by rotable power and an output driven by the individual unit. The input and output are engaged such that the input and output are rotable relative to one another along the path of rotational movement when in an overrunning condition. The invention comprises negating the need for a complicated algorithm or use of a microprocessor unit to detect such overrunning condition, and generally comprises the following components of a non-contact detection system:
A principal aspect of the present invention employs a magnetic reed switching system having three components, i.e. an actuator magnet, a magnetic reed switch sensor, and a metallic shield therebetween. The state of the switch, i.e. “open” or “closed” changes by shielding or unshielding the magnetic flux between the sensor and the magnet.
In this invention, each rotor slippage can be detected independently, without the need for comparing average speed differentials to that of its neighboring rotor. Error due to speed averaging is avoided.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a strong slippage signal can be created without computer processing. Thus, the cost of this control system is only a fraction of the cost of prior art systems.
Also, the detection system of the present invention is easy to troubleshoot, allowing the operator to test and adjust a magnetic sensor by using a basic test-light, without the need to rotate the drums as fully nor to run the harvester engine at as high a risk. That is, the present invention allows fault detection within, for example, the first faulty ⅛ of a revolution and at near zero speed, as compared to the prior art systems where fault detection requires more movement and speed.
These aspects and others in their most preferred embodiment will become apparent from the following Detailed Description which will relate more detail regarding components of a detection system which comprise the following components:
(a) a drive gear, powered by the engine drive shaft and mounted to the external drive portion of the slip clutch;
(b) a magnetic actuator element also tied to said external drive portion of the slip clutch;
(c) an internal hub portion of said slip clutch, being keyed to the rotor shaft, and having a cover shield designed to intermittently shield magnetic flux emanating from the magnetic actuator; and
(d) at least one magnetic reed sensor switch mounted to receive magnetic flux from the actuator unless shielded by the cover shield.
a–5c are illustrations of reed switch modes a) actuated (unshielded), b) unactuated by virtue of being out of range, and c) unactuated by being shielded.
a is a top view of the drum clutch of the present invention without either the reed switch or the magnetic actuator.
b is a perspective view of the drum clutch.
c is a perspective view of the drum clutch having its hub portion separated from the external drive portion.
Referring now to
The external housing 8, forms the outside of clutch 10, and has mounted to its bottom, the rotor drive gear 7, and has affixed at its edge an actuator support 6, which carries actuator 5. These components all rotate together, biased against clutch internal ratcheting mechanism 102 (see
When the rotor assembly 200 (see
The internal ratcheting hub 102 of the clutch allows a limited number of stops “n”, via pins 104, which stops are preferably keyed to coincide with each of the fins 21 of the shield 2, so that each stop “n” position allows one of the fins 21, going at rate N2, to shield the actuator 5 when it rotates at N1 equals N2. The cover shield 2 and hub 102 are keyed to the rotor shaft 1.
A bracket 4 is fixed on the drum chassis 201 so as not to rotate. The bracket 4 supports a reed switch sensor 3 mounted to said bracket 4 so as to face the actuator 5, for at least a certain minimum interval, during every revolution of the drive gear sprocket 7 and clutch housing 8. Thus when N1 and N2 are equal, the ratchet system of the clutch hub 102 is most preferably at a stable position and therefore actuator 5 is shielded from sensor 3, by one of the fins 21, and, as such cannot be activated until N1 does not equal N2.
Referring more particularly to
a) graphically illustrates the reed switch sensor's (3) actuated mode for the unshielded position where the circuit is closed and a light 300 indicates warning that the clutch is slipping. At
Referring now to
Referring now to
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3786776 | Buthe et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3936754 | Minami | Feb 1976 | A |
4255946 | Hansen | Mar 1981 | A |
4282702 | McBee | Aug 1981 | A |
4306403 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4458226 | Cho | Jul 1984 | A |
4592249 | Lehmann et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4597480 | Schwarz | Jul 1986 | A |
4949828 | Olsen | Aug 1990 | A |
5343675 | Norton | Sep 1994 | A |
5621317 | Wozniak | Apr 1997 | A |
5947246 | Koller | Sep 1999 | A |
6318056 | Rauch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339325 | Oda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6481296 | Jin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6550607 | Watson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20020174640 | Fox | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040164731 | Moreno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
58-91933 | Jul 1983 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050217960 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |