Embodiments described relate to drums for accommodating well access lines, often referred to as winch drums. In particular, drums are disclosed of novel configuration for withstanding increased stress concentration from well access lines employed in ever deeper and more tortuous well operations.
Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As such, tremendous emphasis is often placed on well access in the hydrocarbon recovery industry. That is, access to a well at an oilfield for monitoring its condition and maintaining its proper health is of great importance in the industry. As described below, such access to the well is generally provided by a well access line accommodated by a drum positioned at the oilfield.
During monitoring and maintaining of a well, a host of oilfield equipment may be located at the oilfield near the well. As indicated, one such piece of equipment may be a drum assembly accommodating a well access line. The well access line itself may be a coiled tubing line capable of delivering a fluid therethrough and to the well. Alternatively, the line may be a wireline configured to deliver a well tool downhole into the well. In the case of coiled tubing, the line may be threaded through an injector arm and into the well, whereas a more conventional wireline may be dropped into the well from a mast over the well. Regardless, several thousand feet of well access line may be accommodated at the drum for delivery into the well, thereby providing well access for a variety of well monitoring and maintenance procedures.
In the case of wireline procedures, several thousand feet of wireline cable may be provided to the oilfield wrapped about the drum assembly. In many cases wireline access to the well proceeds with a logging tool coupled to the wireline and dropped into the well. With the tool positioned downhole, the cable is then pulled uphole by the drum assembly as the logging application proceeds, recording information relative to the well and surrounding formation. In this manner a log revealing an overall profile of the well may be established, with measurements being recorded continuously as a function of depth in the well.
Similarly, a coiled tubing application may proceed with several thousand feet of coiled tubing provided to the oilfield by way of a drum assembly. The coiled tubing may be threaded through a gooseneck arm and injector for driving of the coiled tubing into the well in order to perform an operation within the well. For example, the coiled tubing may be employed in a clean out operation. That is, the coiled tubing may be equipped with a spray tool and directed to an area of accumulated debris within the well. In this manner a fluid may be pumped through the coiled tubing in order to clean out the debris within the well. The coiled tubing may then be pulled uphole and out of the well for subsequent well operations.
Regardless of the particular type of well access line or procedure, such as those noted above, the drum assembly is subjected to a significant amount of strain and tension from the load placed thereon by the line. For example, the withdrawal alone of the well access line from the well places a significant amount of stress on the drum. That is, tension is exerted on the drum during this pulling as a result of the weight of the line and any tools disposed thereon. Additional tension is also exerted on the drum as a result of the friction of the line and the tool being dragged up against the well wall. Furthermore, there may be a significant amount of fluid resistance to the tool being removed, especially at any high rate of speed. The cumulative effects of such tension may lead to plastifying of the drum in particular locations, eventually leaving the drum ineffective for proper use in well access operations. The drum is particularly susceptible to plastifying of this nature at a junction of its core, about which the line is wrapped, and the wall-like flanges at the sides of the core which help to retain the line in position about the core. Unfortunately, once rendered ineffective in this manner, the drum may be replaced at a cost that may be in excess of $80,000 or more.
Furthermore, the frequency of drum replacement for well access operations has risen sharply in the last several years and is likely to continue rising. This is a result of the types of wells which are becoming more and more common. That is, in today's hydrocarbon recovery industry, highly deviated and tortuous wells are becoming more and more common along with deeper and deeper wells. As a result, the tension of the line on the drum is increased due to the added amount of friction and fluid resistance that accompany such wells as well as the added weight of the longer line, perhaps 30,000 feet or longer. Indeed, the life expectancy of a conventional drum regularly employed in such high tension operations is significantly reduced and to date, no significant drum assembly modifications have been implemented to materially alter this fact.
A drum for providing a well access line at an oilfield is disclosed. The drum includes an inner core and at least one flange integrally coupled thereto at a junction of the core and the flange. The junction may be of an arcuate configuration for reducing stress concentration thereat. Additionally, a collar is provided about the core for accommodating the well access line thereabout. However, this collar may be structurally independent of the flange.
Embodiments are described with reference to certain drums and well access operations. As such, certain configurations of drums are depicted and described. For example, the embodiments describe particular wireline applications in which the drum is configured for accommodating wireline with a well tool disposed at the downhole end thereof. However, a variety of other oilfield applications may take advantage of drum embodiments described herein. For example, the well access line may be coiled tubing for delivering a fluid to a well at the oilfield. Regardless, embodiments described herein include a drum that is configured to accommodate a well access line imparting increased tension on the drum. Such drums may be particularly advantageous for oilfield applications directed at deeper or more tortuous wells.
Referring now to
Continuing with reference to
With added reference to
Referring now to
As described above, when the core 105 is accommodating a well access line 300 as depicted in
Separation of the inner core 107 from a flange 115 at the core-flange junction 250 due to stress concentration from a line 300 as shown in
In addition to plastifying resistance as provided by the arcuate portion 200, the core 105 is equipped with a collar 110 as described above. Thus, with added reference to
Continuing with reference to
Referring now to
Continuing with reference to
For the logging application described above, a significant amount of strain and tension may be placed on the assembly 100 by the well access line 300. This strain may be quite significant given the potentially extensive length of the line 300 and depth of the well 320 as is becoming more common in the hydrocarbon recovery industry. Furthermore, strain may be magnified as the logging tool 310 is pulled back uphole due to factors such as the friction of the line 300 and tool 310 against the wall of the well 320 along with fluid resistance to the uphole movement.
Continuing with reference to
With particular reference to
The drum 101 is positioned between walls of the trailer housing 351 as depicted in
Continuing now with reference to
The ductile material insert 500 may be of a material that is of a higher fatigue life than the material of the adjacent core 105 and flange 115. Nevertheless, the insert 500 may be configured to be removable and replaceable due to its location at the core-flange junction 250. That is, regardless of the particular hardness, lifespan, or other characteristics of the ductile material insert 500, the removable nature thereof may allow for continued use of the drum 101 with a subsequent insert so long as replaced in advance of plastifying of portions of the neighboring core 105 and flange 115.
Referring now to
In the embodiment of
Embodiments described hereinabove provide a drum assembly of improved plastifying resistance. This is achieved in light of significant load placed on the drum, in particular, at a core-flange junction thereof. The load may be from the accommodating of up to 30 or more layers of well access line about a core of the drum as well as from withdrawal of the line from a well, including where the withdrawal is from an extended reach well or one of a particularly tortuous or deviated configuration. As a result, the life of the drum may be significantly extended even in the face of regular use in high tension well access operations.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. For example, reduced stress at the core flange junction may be achieved with additional drum configurations including elongating the core beyond a conventional 35 to 50 inches so as to reduce the total number of well access line layers to be accommodated by the drum. Thus, a 30,000 foot line may be accommodated at the drum with a profile of less than about 30 layers about the core. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
This Patent Document is a continuation-in-part claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/617,341 entitled High Load Flange Profile for a Wireline Drums, filed on Dec. 28, 2006, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1404934 | Cunningham | Jan 1922 | A |
1822422 | Richardson | Sep 1931 | A |
1822474 | Bureau | Sep 1931 | A |
1962086 | Bixby | Jun 1934 | A |
1984604 | Stahl | Dec 1934 | A |
2299532 | Cronk et al. | Oct 1942 | A |
2420050 | Maude | May 1947 | A |
2587707 | Dever | Mar 1952 | A |
2805290 | Wentsel | Sep 1957 | A |
2892598 | Dudley | Jun 1959 | A |
2944756 | Wilson | Jul 1960 | A |
3266748 | Le Bus, Sr. | Aug 1966 | A |
3323743 | Landgraf | Jun 1967 | A |
3391443 | Le Bus, Sr. | Jul 1968 | A |
3610549 | Wennerstrom et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3633843 | Sutton | Jan 1972 | A |
3717315 | Kovaleski | Feb 1973 | A |
3850380 | Kranefeld | Nov 1974 | A |
4269371 | Kovaleski | May 1981 | A |
4602751 | Vogel | Jul 1986 | A |
5322233 | Hehner et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5330127 | Hafner | Jul 1994 | A |
5474254 | Faulkner | Dec 1995 | A |
5613648 | Paavila | Mar 1997 | A |
5975455 | Alegre | Nov 1999 | A |
6701113 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6916045 | Clancy, III et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6980709 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20030085391 | Noske | May 2003 | A1 |
20050092281 | Choi | May 2005 | A1 |
20060273213 | Turk et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
127204 | Sep 1977 | DD |
10224481 | Jan 2004 | DE |
1178007 | Feb 2002 | EP |
58067890 | May 1983 | JP |
58119595 | Jul 1983 | JP |
58216892 | Dec 1983 | JP |
62017240 | Jan 1987 | JP |
62024868 | Feb 1987 | JP |
543193 | Feb 1993 | JP |
61009559 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2005140322 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2205148 | May 2003 | RU |
0144088 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080185139 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11617341 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12047849 | US |