The subject technology relates generally to equipment and a method for tuning of percussion instruments, and more particularly to an improved apparatus and method for tuning a drum.
Pitched percussion instruments (e.g., drums such as a snare drum and a bass drum) need to be properly tuned. The drums are made of a hollow cylindrical barrel, typically composed of multiple different wood species, with a “batter” head (i.e., the head that the drum stick strikes to produce sound) being placed on the top side of the barrel and secured thereto using a metal or wood hoop, and a resonant head placed on the bottom of the barrel, being secured thereto using another hoop. The hoops are secured to the barrel using a plurality of tension rods (usually at least six and sometimes more than twelve rods) that are threadably connected to mountings on the barrel. The tension rods usually terminate in a square-shaped head (a “lug”) that may be rotated using a tuning key that may have an opening that matches the cross-sectional shape of the tuning screw head. In general each of the batter head and the resonant head are tuned by adjusting the tension in each of the tension rods in a meticulous process.
The process starts with the bottom head—the resonant head, which is often clear, as opposed to the top (batter) head which is often coated with a white thick textured coating.
Each of the tensioning rods of the resonant head are successively finger tightened to begin with very even tension on each of the lugs.
After the initial finger tightening, the person tuning the drum will “break in” the head, if new, by depressing the head with both fists across the surface of the head, which makes the head sit better.
Next, each lug is again successively retightened by hand, as breaking in the head may have resulted in it loosening proximate to at least some of the tensions rods.
Then palm pressure is applied using one hand on the hoop at each of the lug locations, one at a time, and the lugs are again finger tightened while the pressure is applied, with the use of the same amount of pressure at each lug location. Use of the pressure also serves to better seat the head, and gets the drum close to the desired pitch. This hand tightening while pressure is applied creates very even tension, probably even better than may initially be obtained using a drum key, because there is less of a sense of feel using the key, which may tend to apply disparate amounts of torque depending upon where the user grasps the head (“bow”) of the key with his/her thumb and forefinger. Grasping the head of the key even slightly differently using only those two fingers may produce different lever arms, resulting in a disparate amount of tension in each of the lugs. Also, overtightening may stretch the head and subsequently make it very difficult to tune properly.
Next, the batter head is tightened according to each of the above steps that were used for the resonant head.
Then, the key is used to tighten each one of the lugs of the resonant head first, in a star pattern, successively tightening the pairs of lugs that are opposite each other. Each one is successively tightened one-half of a turn of the key (i.e., rotation of 180 degrees of the key), which generally provides for the same amount of additional tension for each lug location. Then the key is used again to tighten each lug in the same star pattern, but this time only one-quarter of a turn (i.e., 90 degrees of rotation).
Next the tuning at each lug location is checked by successively tapping on the head in proximity to each of the lugs using a finger (e.g., a fore finger). The sounds produced at each of the locations may be compared to see if the pitch is close. A location that is either low or high may respectively be adjusted by a slight turn of the key for added or reduced tensioning of the particular lug.
The batter head may then be tightened using the key using the same steps that were used for the resonant head, but initially using one-quarter of a turn (90 degrees).
A few different methods can be used for the final tuning of the drum. It is desirable to tune for the responsiveness of the head, and also to tune for the relationship between the different drums used (e.g., the toms may be related by thirds in pitch).
The resonant head and the batter head may also be tuned to the same pitch or may be tuned to be related in pitch (e.g., related by thirds). The related tuning of the batter head and resonant head depends on the number of plies of each head, for example, where the batter head is a two-ply head and the resonant head is a one-ply head (i.e., thinner), the bottom head will naturally be higher in pitch when at the same tension.
To fine tune the batter head for any of those approaches, the resonant head is held with a first hand to keep it from resonating to get a good clear tone from the batter head, which first hand may also be grasping the key. Then a drum stick held in the second hand is used to successively tap on the batter head proximate to each lug location. Any of the lug locations that may be low or high with respect to a musical note to which the head is being tuned are then adjusted using the key held in the first hand, which first hand may repeatedly go back and forth between the holding the resonant head and the making of small adjustments to the tension of the lugs that may be slightly off. This back and forth motion for fine tuning of each of the drums is slow and laborious. Also, because the head of the drum key is generally finger sized, it is often difficult to tell whether or not it has been turned close to the prescribed 180 degrees or to the prescribed 90 degrees, when required prior to the fine tuning steps, which may cause tone discrepancies.
The present invention solves these and other problems.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved method for tuning a pitched percussion instrument.
It is another object of the invention to provide apparatus that makes it easier to tune a pitched percussion instrument.
It is a further object of the invention to provide apparatus that allows a pitched percussion instrument to be tuned faster.
It is another object of the invention to provide apparatus that allows a pitched percussion instrument to be tuned more precisely.
It is also an object of the invention to provide apparatus that eliminates the awkwardness in the fine tuning of a pitched percussion instrument.
Further objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and claims, and from the accompanying drawings.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In accordance with at least a first embodiment a drum tuning apparatus may include: a shaft that extends from a first end to a second end, the first end of the shaft being separated from the second end of the shaft by a distance L; a percussion mallet formed on the first end of the shaft; and an elongated member that extends from the shaft substantially transverse with respect to an axis of the shaft. A distal end of the elongated member has an opening defining a recess, where the recess is shaped and sized to receive a lug of a drum tension rod therein. An outer surface of the elongated member proximate to its distal end may preferably be formed as a cylindrical surface. In another embodiment, a drum tuning apparatus may additionally include a second percussion mallet formed on the second end of the shaft; such that the drum tuning apparatus is more particularly configured to tune different types of percussion instruments without having to use different tools. In one version of this embodiment the first percussion mallet may be a snare drum tip, and the second percussion mallet may be a bass drum tip. In one embodiment a proximal portion of the elongated member may be received in an orifice in the shaft in a friction fit to secure the elongated member to the shaft. Alternatively, a proximal portion of the elongated member may be releasably secured to the shaft using a mechanical fastener. In yet another embodiment, the elongated member may be integrally formed with the shaft.
The description of the various example embodiments is explained in conjunction with appended drawings, in which:
As used throughout this specification, the word “may” is used in a permissive sense (i.e., meaning having the potential to), rather than a mandatory sense (i.e., meaning must), as more than one embodiment of the invention may be disclosed herein. Similarly, the words “include”, “including”, and “includes” mean including but not limited to.
The phrases “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” may be open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, and “A, B, and/or C” herein means all of the following possible combinations: A alone; or B alone; or C alone; or A and B together; or A and C together; or B and C together; or A, B and C together.
Also, the disclosures of all patents, published patent applications, and non-patent literature cited within this document are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. However, it is noted that citing herein of any patents, published patent applications, and non-patent literature is not an admission as to any of those references constituting prior art with respect to the disclosed apparatus.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of any particular embodiment disclosed herein, may be combined in any suitable manner with any of the other embodiments disclosed herein.
Additionally, any approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative or qualitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term such as “about” is not to be limited to the precise value specified, and may include values that differ from the specified value in accordance with applicable case law. Also, in at least some instances, a numerical difference provided by the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument that may be used for measuring the value. A numerical difference provided by the approximating language may also correspond to a manufacturing tolerance associated with production of the aspect/feature being quantified. Furthermore, a numerical difference provided by the approximating language may also correspond to an overall tolerance for the aspect/feature that may be derived from variations resulting from a stack up (i.e., the sum) of a multiplicity of such individual tolerances.
Any use of a friction fit (i.e., an interface fit) between two mating parts described herein indicates that the opening (e.g., a hole) is smaller than the part received therein (e.g., a shaft), which may be a slight interference in one embodiment in the range of 0.0001 inches to 0.0003 inches, or an interference of 0.0003 inches to 0.0007 inches in another embodiment, or an interference of 0.0007 inches to 0.0010 inches in yet another embodiment, or a combination of such ranges. Other values for the interference may also be used in different configurations (see e.g., “Press Fit Engineering and Design Calculator,” available at: www.engineersedge.com/calculators/machine-design/press-fit/press-fit-calculator.htm).
Any described use of a clearance fit indicates that the opening (e.g., a hole) is larger than the part received therein (e.g., a shaft), enabling the two parts to move (e.g. to slide and/or rotate) when assembled, where the gap between the opening and the part may depend upon the size of the part and the type of clearance fit—i.e., loose running, free running, easy running, close running, and sliding (e.g., for a 0.1250 inch shall diameter the opening may be 0.1285 inches for a close running fit, and may be 0.1360 inches for a free running fit; for a 0.5000 inch diameter shaft the opening may be 0.5156 inches for a close running fit and may be 0.5312 inches for a free running fit). Other clearance amounts are used for other clearance types. See “Engineering Fit” at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_fit; and “Three General Types of Fit.” available at www.mmto.org/dclark/Reports/Encoder%20Upgrade/fittolerences%20%5BRead-Only%5D.pdf.
As used herein, the term “hand-held” describes an item, at least one part of which is easily and conveniently handled in an average-sized human hand. Preferably, this term indicates that the entire item has an ergonomic size, weight, and shape which makes it easy to comfortably hold in the hand, during use.
A proximal portion 104P of the member 104 may be any suitable shape, and as seen in
A prior art method for a fine tuning step for a drum may be seen in
A method for fine tuning of a drum in accordance with the present invention using the drum tuning apparatus 100 may be seen in
The arrangement of the drum tuning apparatus 100 thus creates a synergist effect in that it better enables the person tuning the drum to do so more easily, and more quickly, and to also tune different types of percussion instruments without having to use a different tool or tools. Additionally, rather than using both the person's dominant hand and non-dominant hand, as with the prior art method and key, to respectively do the tapping with a drum stick and the tension adjustments with the tuning key, use of the drum tuning apparatus 100 permits the person to use only the non-dominant hand for merely maintaining contact with the resonant head, which requires little or no dexterity, and to use the dominant hand for both the tapping and the tension adjustment, which does require some dexterity.
The drum tuning apparatus 100 may be further configured to provides other advantageous benefits. As seen in
Therefore, as seen in
For a bass drum having a 20-22 inch diameter, to create a gap D of about 1.0 inches the distance L2ii may preferably be roughly 4.8 inches (or slightly longer), and for a little extra room, to create a gap D of about 1.25 inches the distance L2ii may thus preferably be roughly 5.1 inches. So where L2i=L2ii, the shaft 103 may be roughly 9.5 inches to 10.2 inches in length.
It is also noted that the length L2ii (and length L2i) of the shaft 103 being at least 7.5 to 8.0 inches may also be better suited for the user to be able to more precisely judge the degree to which small incremental rotational amounts are made for the fine tuning steps, due to the length of the shaft 103 providing a better visual indication for that purpose as well.
As noted above, another advantage of the drum tuning apparatus 100 may be provided by utilizing a snare drum tip 151 at the first end 101 of the shaft 103, and a bass drum tip 152 at the second end 102 of the shaft 103, so that the same tuning key/mallet may be used for those two different percussion instruments. Additionally, one portion of the shaft 103 (e.g., length Lii) may be sized for use on the snare drum, while a second portion of the shaft 103 (e.g., length Li) may be sized for use on the bass drum. Other tip combinations may also be used in other embodiments, and which may include, but is not limited to, a round rubber mallet tip (see
While illustrative implementations of one or more embodiments of the present invention are provided hereinabove, those skilled in the art and having the benefit of the present disclosure will appreciate that further embodiments may be implemented with various changes within the scope of the present invention. Other modifications, substitutions, omissions and changes may be made in the design, size, materials used or proportions, operating conditions, assembly sequence, or arrangement or positioning of elements and members of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of this invention.
Accordingly, the breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described example embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/713,041, filed on Aug. 1, 2018, having the title “Drum Tuning Key with Elongated Head Formed as a Double Mallet,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
151797 | Rawson | Jun 1874 | A |
1484777 | Hassenpflug | Feb 1924 | A |
2132105 | Gladstone | Oct 1938 | A |
3113481 | Thompson | Dec 1963 | A |
3139783 | Grant | Jul 1964 | A |
3165964 | Stys | Jan 1965 | A |
4208942 | Henrit | Jun 1980 | A |
4218952 | Arbiter | Aug 1980 | A |
4287806 | Neary | Sep 1981 | A |
4541322 | Calato | Sep 1985 | A |
4870883 | Gauger | Oct 1989 | A |
5193418 | Behrenfeld | Mar 1993 | A |
D366996 | Torres | Feb 1996 | S |
5689076 | Usuda | Nov 1997 | A |
5693900 | Cabato | Dec 1997 | A |
5739448 | Toscano | Apr 1998 | A |
5977463 | Bartlett | Nov 1999 | A |
6242680 | Benton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
7244882 | Colwell | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7351900 | May | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7495161 | Richards | Feb 2009 | B1 |
9773481 | Goldsmith | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9934764 | Jones | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20030159550 | Shigenaga | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050056137 | DiPietro | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070163400 | Parise | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193433 | Takegawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080022840 | May | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090064844 | O'Connor | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20140026732 | Spinazzola | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140165819 | McGee | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20206104 | Sep 2002 | DE |
2009172747 | Aug 2009 | JP |
3186182 | Sep 2013 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62713041 | Aug 2018 | US |