Dry compositions

Abstract
The object of the present invention is to provide a dry composition having the following advantageous properties. That is, even when left in a highly humid environment, the dry composition of the present invention scarcely loses its pharmacological activity, does not deliquesce and retains its dry state over a long period of time.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph showing the particle size distribution of the dry composition in the form of particles produced by using isoleucine as the amino acid.



FIG. 2 is a graph showing the particle size distribution of the dry composition in the form of particles produced by using alanine as the amino acid.



FIG. 3 is a graph showing the particle size distribution of the dry composition in the form of particles produced by using proline as the amino acid.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The present invention is further described by reference to the following examples.


Example 1

A suitable amount of distilled water for injection was poured into respective vials to give 1 ml of an injection comprising 0.1 ml of a drug substance in solution containing interferon-α (hereinafter referred to as “IFN-α bulk solution”, titer: 2×107 IU/ml), 5 mg of various amino acids and 1 mg of human serum albumin (HSA) per vial and subjected to lyophilization. Those samples were left to stand for three days under the conditions where the temperature was 40° C., relative humidity (RH) was 75% and the vials were left open (uncapped). Three days after, the titer of IFN-α was determined and the residual activity of INF-α was calculated by setting the IFN-α activity measured after drying to equal 100%.


Further, the same samples were evaluated for change in appearance after three days of standing under the conditions where the temperature was 40° C., RH was 75% and the vials were open. The results are shown in Table 1 below.














TABLE 1









Residual






IFN-α





Activity




Initial
at 40° C.,




IFN-α
RH 75%,
Change



Hydropathy
Activity
3 days
in



Index
(%)
after(%)
Appearance




















Isoleucine
4.5
100
84.3
No Change


Valine
4.2
100
79.5
No Change


Leucine
3.8
100
77.6
No Change


Phenyl-
2.8
100
61.9
No Change


alanine


Alanine
1.9
100
34.9
Slightly






Deliquesced


Glycine
−0.4
100
69.2
Almost






Deliquesced


Proline
−1.6
100
51.3
Completely






Deliquesced


Arginine
−4.5
100
48.8
Completely






Deliquesced









As is evident from the results summarized in Table 1, the products obtained by the present invention employing the hydrophobic amino acids having a Hydropathy Index of 3 or greater are remarkably superior in stability of IFN-α and/or change in appearance to the products in which other amino acids were employed, even when left in an excessively humid environment.


Example 2
(1) Spray-Dried Products Containing IFN-α and Isoleucine

Deionized water was added to a mixture of 50 ml of an IFN-α bulk solution (titer: 2×107 IU/ml), 3500 mg of isoleucine and 700 mg of HSA, and then stirred thoroughly, to prepare 700 g of an IFN-α solution. To 700 g of this IFN-α solution was added 300 g of ethanol to give a weight ratio of water to ethanol of 7:3, and the solution to be spray-dried was produced.


Using a spray drier (Yamato Pulvis Basic Unit Model GB-21, manufactured by Yamato Science Co., Ltd.) under the conditions of air-supplying temperature of 130° C., spraying pressure of 2 kg/cm2 and spraying rate of 10 g/min, the above solution was spray-dried to produce dry particles.


(2) Spray-Dried Product Containing Isoleucine but Not Containing IFN-α for Use as a Placebo

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in (1) above with the exception that IFN-α was not employed.


The dry particles produced by the processes (1) and (2) above were each evaluated for aerodynamic average particle size (volume basis distribution), and the results are shown in Table 2 below. Aerodynamic average particle size was determined by dispersing the particles using an aerodisperser (Amherst Process Instruments, Inc.) and the measurement was conducted by using an aerosizer (Amherst Process Instruments, Inc.). Measuring conditions are as follows: air-stream shearing force: medium; sample particles supplying rate: medium; deagglomeration: normal; and vibration of dispersing pin: on.











TABLE 2







Aerodynamic Average



Particle Size (μm)



















Isoleucine (placebo)
0.9697



Isoleucine (IFN)
0.9549










Table 2 demonstrates that IFN-α does not affect the aerodynamic average particle size of the spray-dried products and the particle size distribution of the particles is dependent on the nature of amino acids employed.


Test Example 1

To make a solution containing 0.5 wt % of each amino acid indicated in Table 3 and 0.1 wt % of HSA, suitable amount of deionized water was added to the solution and thoroughly stirred to prepare 700 g of an amino acid solution. To 700 g of this solution was added ethanol to give a weight ratio of water to ethanol of 7:3, and the solution to be spray-dried was produced.


Using a spray drier (Yamato Pulvis Basic Unit Model GB-21, manufactured by Yamato Science Co., Ltd.) under the conditions of air-supplying temperature of 130° C., spraying pressure of 2 kg/cm2 and spraying rate of 10 g/min, the above solution was spray-dried to produce the dry particles.


The dry particles produced by the above processes were each evaluated for moisture content (moisture content immediately after production and moisture content 24 hours after standing under the condition of RH 96%) and the average particle size distribution (volume basis distribution), and the results are summarized in Table 3 below.


Measurement of moisture content: the water contained in the dry particles were vaporized using Hiranuma auto moisture vaporizing instrument (LE-24S) and the moisture content was measured by using Hiranuma moisture microanalyzer (AQ-6).


Measurement of particle size: by using a laser diffraction scattering particle size distribution measuring equipment (LEM-24S, manufactured by Seishin Co., Ltd.), the particle size distribution of the dry particles (volume basis distribution) was determined. Measuring conditions were as follows: dispersing nozzle pressure: 5.0 kg/cm2; refractive index: 1.33.














TABLE 3











Residual






IFN-α




Initial
Activity




IFN-α
at RH96%
Particle Size



Hydropathy
Activity
24 hrs
Distribution (μm)














Index
(%)
after(%)
×10
×50
×90

















Isoleucine
4.5
1.38
13.64
1.2
2.0
3.1


Valine
4.2
1.90
10.18
1.2
1.8
3.1


Leucine
3.8
1.69
12.05
1.1
1.7
3.3


Phenylalanine
2.8
2.34
13.74
1.5
2.7
7.4


Alanine
1.9
3.11
46.27
1.2
2.0
12.2


Glycine
−0.4
2.29
66.73
1.5
3.8
9.2


Proline
−1.6
2.25
217.80
2.7
13.4
34.9









Arginine
−4.5
Spray-dried products cannot be produced.









The values shown in Table 3 are cumulative % under sieving. For example, “×50” indicates a particle size in which the particles of smaller sizes are accumulated to occupy 50% of the volume.


The dry particles produced using isoleucine, alanine or proline as the amino acid were evaluated for the particle size distribution by employing the above procedure and the graphs showing individual particle size distribution are represented in FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, respectively.


As is evident from the results shown in Table 1 and FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, the spray-dried products produced by using hydrophobic amino acids having a Hydropathy Index of 3.8 or greater are superior to the products obtained by using other amino acids, in moisture absorption even when the products were left in a highly humid environment and/or in uniformity of the particle size distribution.


Example 3

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that 300 g of ethanol was not added.


ExampleS 4 to 7

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that leucine, valine, leucyl-valine or isoleucyl-valyl-leucine was used in lieu of isoleucine.


ExampleS 8 to 22

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that an IFN-α bulk solution, isoleucine and HSA were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 4.














TABLE 4







Example
IFN-α (IU)
Isoleucine (mg)
HSA (mg)





















8
 100 × 107
3500
0



9
 100 × 107
3500
7



10
 100 × 107
3500
70



11
  1 × 107
3500
700



12
  1 × 107
3500
0



13
  1 × 107
3500
7



14
  1 × 107
3500
70



15
 10 × 107
3500
700



16
 10 × 107
3500
0



17
 10 × 107
3500
7



18
 10 × 107
3500
70



19
1000 × 107
3500
700



20
1000 × 107
3500
0



21
1000 × 107
3500
7



22
1000 × 107
3500
70










ExampleS 23 to 37

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 4 with the exception that an IFN-α bulk solution, leucine and HSA were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 5.














TABLE 5







Example
IFN-α (IU)
Leucine (mg)
HSA (mg)





















23
 100 × 107
3500
0



24
 100 × 107
3500
7



25
 100 × 107
3500
70



26
  1 × 107
3500
700



27
  1 × 107
3500
0



28
  1 × 107
3500
7



29
  1 × 107
3500
70



30
 10 × 107
3500
700



31
 10 × 107
3500
0



32
 10 × 107
3500
7



33
 10 × 107
3500
70



34
1000 × 107
3500
700



35
1000 × 107
3500
0



36
1000 × 107
3500
7



37
1000 × 107
3500
70










Example 38

A suitable amount of deionized water was added to a mixture of 50 ml of an IFN-α bulk solution (titer: 2×107 IU/ml), 3500 mg of isoleucine and 700 mg of HSA, and stirred thoroughly, to prepare 700 ml of an IFN-α solution. This solution was lyophilized, and the resultant lyophilized product was collected and milled using a jet-milling equipment to obtain dry particles.


ExampleS 39 to 53

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 with the exception that an IFN-α bulk solution, isoleucine and HSA were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 6.














TABLE 6







Example
IFN-α (IU)
Isoleucine (mg)
HSA (mg)





















39
 100 × 107
3500
0



40
 100 × 107
3500
7



41
 100 × 107
3500
70



42
  1 × 107
3500
700



43
  1 × 107
3500
0



44
  1 × 107
3500
7



45
  1 × 107
3500
70



46
 10 × 107
3500
700



47
 10 × 107
3500
0



48
 10 × 107
3500
7



49
 10 × 107
3500
70



50
1000 × 107
3500
700



51
1000 × 107
3500
0



52
1000 × 107
3500
7



53
1000 × 107
3500
70










Example 54

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 by performing lyophilization with the exception that in lieu of isoleucine, 3500 mg of leucine was used.


ExampleS 55 to 69

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 54 with the exception that an IFN-α bulk solution, leucine and HSA were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 7.














TABLE 7







Example
IFN-α (IU)
Leucine (mg)
HSA (mg)





















55
 100 × 107
3500
0



56
 100 × 107
3500
7



57
 100 × 107
3500
70



58
  1 × 107
3500
700



59
  1 × 107
3500
0



60
  1 × 107
3500
7



61
  1 × 107
3500
70



62
 10 × 107
3500
700



63
 10 × 107
3500
0



64
 10 × 107
3500
7



65
 10 × 107
3500
70



66
1000 × 107
3500
700



67
1000 × 107
3500
0



68
1000 × 107
3500
7



69
1000 × 107
3500
70










Example 70

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of an IFN-γ bulk solution (titer: 2×107 IU/ml) was used.


Example 71

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of a bulk solution containing interleukin-1β in which cysteine at position 71 was substituted with serine (described in European Patent Publication No. 237073A; titer: 1.2×108 IU/ml) was used.


Example 72

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of a bulk solution containing interleukin-1β in which asparagine at position 36 was substituted with aspartic acid and cysteine at position 141 was substituted with serine (described in European Patent Publication No. 237073A; titer: 1.3×108 IU/ml) was used.


Example 73

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of an IFN-γ bulk solution (titer: 2×107 IU/ml) was used.


Example 74

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of a bulk solution containing interleukin-1β in which cysteine at position 71 was substituted with serine (described in European Patent Publication No. 237073A; titer: 1.2×108 IU/ml) was used.


Example 75

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 with the exception that in lieu of the IFN-α bulk solution, 50 ml of a bulk solution containing interleukin-1β in which asparagine at position 36 was substituted with aspartic acid and cysteine at position 141 was substituted with serine (described in European Patent Publication No. 237073A; titer: 1.2×108 IU/ml) was used.


ExampleS 76 to 91

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 2 with the exception that the IFN-α bulk solution, hydrophobic stabilizers (leucine and valine) and other stabilizers (glycine, sucrose or mannitol) were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 8.












TABLE 8









Hydrophobic




Stabilizer
Other Stabilizer













Exam-
IFN-α
Leucine
Valine
Glycine
Sucrose
Mannitol


ple
(IU)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)





76
  1 × 107
3000
500





77
 10 × 107
3000
500


78
 100 × 107
3000
500


79
1000 × 107
3000
500


80
  1 × 107
2500
500
500


81
 10 × 107
2500
500
500


82
 100 × 107
2500
500
500


83
1000 × 107
2500
500
500


84
  1 × 107
2500
500

500


85
 10 × 107
2500
500

500


86
 100 × 107
2500
500

500


87
1000 × 107
2500
500

500


88
  1 × 107
2500
500


500


89
 10 × 107
2500
500


500


90
 100 × 107
2500
500


500


91
1000 × 107
2500
500


500









ExampleS 92 to 107

Dry particles were produced in the similar manner as in Example 38 with the exception that the IFN-α bulk solution, hydrophobic stabilizers (leucine and valine) and other stabilizers (glycine, sucrose or mannitol) were employed in the amounts indicated in Table 9.












TABLE 9









Hydrophobic




Stabilizer
Other Stabilizer













Exam-
IFN-α
Leucine
Valine
Glycine
Sucrose
Mannitol


ple
(IU)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)
(mg)
















92
  1 × 107
3000
500





93
 10 × 107
3000
500


94
 100 × 107
3000
500


95
1000 × 107
3000
500


96
  1 × 107
2500
500
500


97
 10 × 107
2500
500
500


98
 100 × 107
2500
500
500


99
1000 × 107
2500
500
500


100
  1 × 107
2500
500

500


101
 10 × 107
2500
500

500


102
 100 × 107
2500
500

500


103
1000 × 107
2500
500

500


104
  1 × 107
2500
500


500


105
 10 × 107
2500
500


500


106
 100 × 107
2500
500


500


107
1000 × 107
2500
500


500








Claims
  • 1. A dry composition comprising at least one of active ingredients selected from the group consisting of pharmacologically active proteins and pharmacologically active polypeptides and as a stabilizer at least one of hydrophobic stabilizers selected the group consisting of hydrophobic amino acids, hydrophobic dipeptides and hydrophobic tripeptides having a Hydropathy Index of at least about 3.
  • 2. A dry composition according to claim 1, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic stabilizer having a Hydropathy Index ranging from about 3.8 to about 4.5.
  • 3. A dry composition according to claim 2, wherein the stabilizer is valine.
  • 4. A dry composition according to claim 2, wherein the stabilizer is leucine.
  • 5. A dry composition according to claim 2, wherein the stabilizer is isoleucine.
  • 6. A dry composition according to claim 2, wherein the active ingredient is interferon.
  • 7. A dry composition according to claim 6, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic amino acid.
  • 8. A dry composition according to claim 7, wherein the active ingredient is interferon-α.
  • 9. A dry composition according to claim 2, wherein the active ingredient is interleukin.
  • 10. A dry composition according to claim 9, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic amino acid.
  • 11. A dry composition according to claim 1, wherein the particle size is in the range of from 0.1 μm to 10 μm.
  • 12. A dry composition according to claim 11, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic stabilizer having a Hydropathy Index ranging from about 3.8 to about 4.5.
  • 13. A dry composition according to claim 12, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic amino acid.
  • 14. A dry composition according to claim 13, wherein the stabilizer is valine.
  • 15. A dry composition according to claim 13, wherein the stabilizer is leucine.
  • 16. A dry composition according to claim 13, wherein the stabilizer is isoleucine.
  • 17. A dry composition according to claim 12, wherein the active ingredient is interferon.
  • 18. A dry composition according to claim 17, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic amino acid.
  • 19. A dry composition according to claim 18, wherein the stabilizer is valine.
  • 20. A dry composition according to claim 18, wherein the stabilizer is leucine.
  • 21. A dry composition according to claim 18, wherein the stabilizer is isoleucine.
  • 22. A dry composition according to claim 12, wherein the active ingredient is interleukin.
  • 23. A dry composition according to claim 22, wherein the stabilizer is a hydrophobic amino acid.
  • 24. A dry composition according to claim 11, wherein the particle size is in the range of from 0.5 μm to 10 μm.
  • 25. A dry composition according to claim 1 which is obtained by spray-drying method.
  • 26. A dry composition according to claim 11 which is obtained by spray-drying method and has the particle size in the range of from 0.5 μm to 10 μm.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
336714/1995 Dec 1995 JP national
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10143815 May 2002 US
Child 11516728 US
Parent 09091676 Jun 1998 US
Child 10143815 US