Dry electrodes for electroencephalography

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10987015
  • Patent Number
    10,987,015
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 24, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 27, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
An electroencephalography (EEG) system includes a dry electrode design having a jagged, angular, comb, etc. shaped support housing. Each dry electrode housing includes multiple electrodes where each electrode has multiple contacts for scalp placement with minimal interference from hair. Signals from individual contacts may be disregarded and each housing may provide one or more aggregated signals for data analysis. Each electrode may be placed in close proximity with neighboring electrodes as no conductive gel is required and may be attached to the scalp using straps, elastic cap, spring-type materials, tape, etc. The dry electrode design effectively measures bio-signals including neurological activity.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,190; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,211; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,221; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,225; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/113,863; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/113,870; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,240; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,253; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,262; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,066; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,074; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,851; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,874; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,557; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,583; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,596; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/200,813; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,372; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,069; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,388; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,921; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,934; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,958; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/846,242; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/410,380; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/410,372; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/413,297; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/545,455; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,660; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,685; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/444,149; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,696; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/731,868; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/045,457; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,810; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,828; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,821; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,840; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,197; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/884,034; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/868,531; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/913,102; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,213; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/105,774.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to electrodes for electroencephalography (EEG).


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

Conventional EEG systems use scalp level electrode attachment to monitor neurological activity. Conductive gels and pastes are often applied before placement of the scalp electrodes to improve sensitivity. However, application of conductive gels and pastes is often inconvenient and time consuming. Furthermore, conductive gels and pastes can often bleed between neighboring electrodes and cause signal contamination.


Some efforts have been made in the development of dry electrodes. However, available dry electrodes have a variety of limitations. Consequently, it is desirable to provide improved dry electrodes for EEG.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate particular example embodiments.



FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate examples of EEG caps.



FIG. 2 illustrates one example of an EEG electrode.



FIG. 3 illustrates one example of an EEG electrode contact.



FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate examples of techniques for selecting an electrode signal.



FIG. 5 illustrates one technique for selecting a local signal.



FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a system for performing distributed neuro-response data collection and analysis.



FIG. 7 illustrates one example of a system that can be used to implement one or more mechanisms.





DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to some specific examples of the invention including the best modes contemplated by the inventors for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


For example, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will be described in the context of particular types of sensor materials. However, it should be noted that the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention apply to a variety of different types of materials. It should be noted that various mechanisms and techniques can be applied to any type of stimuli. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Particular example embodiments of the present invention may be implemented without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


Various techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be noted that some embodiments include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. For example, a system uses a processor in a variety of contexts. However, it will be appreciated that a system can use multiple processors while remaining within the scope of the present invention unless otherwise noted. Furthermore, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes describe a connection between two entities. It should be noted that a connection between two entities does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, as a variety of other entities may reside between the two entities. For example, a processor may be connected to memory, but it will be appreciated that a variety of bridges and controllers may reside between the processor and memory. Consequently, a connection does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection unless otherwise noted.


Overview

An electroencephalography (EEG) system includes a dry electrode design having a jagged, angular, comb, etc. shaped support housing. Each dry electrode housing includes multiple electrodes where each electrode has multiple contacts for scalp placement with minimal interference from hair. Signals from individual contacts may be disregarded and each housing may provide one or more aggregated signals for data analysis. Each electrode may be placed in close proximity with neighboring electrodes as no conductive gel is required and may be attached to the scalp using straps, elastic cap, spring-type materials, tape, etc. The dry electrode design effectively measures bio-signals including neurological activity.


Example Embodiments

EEG measures electrical activity associated with post synaptic currents occurring in the milliseconds range. Subcranial EEG can measure electrical activity with the most accuracy, as the bone and dermal layers weaken transmission of a wide range of frequencies. Nonetheless, surface EEG provides a wealth of electrophysiological information if analyzed properly.


Conventional EEG systems use wet electrodes that require skin preparation and application of conductive gels. An example of wet electrodes are silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrodes. Silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrodes have been widely used because of their low cost and stability, but are often inconvenient and uncomfortable. They require conductive gels that can cause allergic reactions and are typically impractical for use outside of controlled environments. Conductive gels are also ineffectiveness where long recording times are required, as gels dry out and lose efficacy over time. Furthermore, wet electrodes often require significant physical separation from neighboring electrodes because conductive gels can bleed onto neighboring electrodes. This limits the resolution EEG scalp measurements as a limited number of electrodes and associated contacts can be used.


Consequently, some efforts have been made in developing dry electrodes. Dry electrodes can have either a conductive or insulating contact material and are often referred to as dry active electrodes. In particular embodiments, a capacitive coupling between the scalp and the electrode is created so that the signal is transferred to the electrode by a capacitive conduction mechanism. Dry electrode sensor material may be an inert metal like stainless steel or gold. Alternatively, the dry electrode sensor material may be an insulator.


Dry electrodes, however, have significantly higher skin electrode impedance. For dry electrodes to be effective, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention contemplate mechanisms for compensating for the high impedance. Impedance may vary and/or fluctuate in regions having a significant number of hair follicles. Impedance may also change in region having high skin elasticity. To compensate for variable and/or flucating impedance, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention provide a jagged shaped support structure for each electrode. Each electrode is provided with multiple contact points or contact pads. In particular embodiments, each electrode selects a locally optimal or preferred signal from the different signals received from the multiple contacts. In some examples, the preferred signal may be a signal having the most consistent and/or highest amplitude during a set of calibrations. According to various embodiments, the locally optimal or preferred signal is amplified and sent to a transmitter. A system also may select a regionally preferred signal from a group of electrodes. According to various embodiments, regionally optimal signals are selected from a group locally optimal signals.


Each electrode may be fabricated using semiconductor manufacturing processes to provide individual electrode integrated circuits. According to various embodiments, each contact has a diameter of 0.5 mm-6 mm. In particular embodiments, each contact has a width of 0.5 mm and a length of 2 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. Smaller contacts more easily navigate through hair to reach the scalp surface. However, too small a contact leads to irritation, and a small contact still does not guarantee that it will reach the scalp. Larger contacts are more comfortable and can provide more surface area for measurement, but can be limited in their ability to read a uniform signal. A large surface contact can not measure a consistent signal due to hair and motion that decouples the contact from the skin surface.


According to various embodiments, each contact is coated with a material to allow for easy navigation through hair while also resisting corrosion. In particular embodiments, each contact is coated with one or more 50 nm-250 nm layers of titanium oxide (TiO2). TiO2 is inert on most physiologic media and effectively resists corrosion. In other examples, silicon nitride (Si3N4) can also be used. Each contact may be connected to selection circuitry to allow an electrode, or a system, to select one or more preferred signals of the electrode. In some instances, no signal may be suitable. Individual electrode may also include filters, capacitors, diodes, power supplies, and amplifiers, and transmitters.


The EEG electrodes can be used to measure spontaneous EEG. The bandwidth of the measurement can range from 0.05 Hz to 80 Hz. The amplitude of the EEG signal can range from 50 uV-250 uV with sensitivity of 10 uV/mm. Evoked potentials (EP) are time-locked averages of neurological activity. According to various embodiments, EP amplitudes range from 0.05-30 uV. It is recognized that both wet and dry electrodes can be used to efficiently measure a variety of signals resulting from neurological activity including spontaneous EEG and EP. According to various embodiments, portable EEG with dry electrodes provide a large amount of neuro-response information.



FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate particular examples of mechanisms for placing EEG dry electrodes on a surface such as the scalp of a subject. According to various embodiments, the distributed neuro-response data collection mechanism includes multiple EEG dry electrodes including electrodes 111, 113, and 115. In particular embodiments, the EEG dry electrodes are spring loaded or cushion loaded operate to detect neurological activity with minimal interference from hair. The EEG dry electrodes also do not require use of any electrically conductive gels. The EEG dry electrodes may each be configured on a longitudinal or latitudinal zig zag arrangement. Each arrangement may have multiple EEG dry electrodes. Each EEG dry electrode may have multiple contacts. According to various embodiments, distributed neuro-response data collection mechanism also includes EOG sensors such as sensor 121 used to detect eye movements.


The data collection mechanism may also include a transmitter and/or receiver to send collected neuro-response data to a data analysis system. In some examples, a transceiver 141 transmits all collected media such as video and/or audio, neuro-response, and sensor data to a data analyzer. In other examples, a transceiver 141 transmits only interested data provided by a filter 143. In other examples, the transceiver 141 also receives information that can be provided to a user or used to modify a system. The filter 143 can remove noise as well as uninteresting portions of collected data. The filter 143 can significantly reduce network usage and can be valuable when limited network resources are available. In some examples, the transceiver can be connected to a computer system that then transmits data over a wide area network to a data analyzer. In other examples, the transceiver sends data over a wide area network to a data analyzer. Other components such as fMRI and MEG that are not yet portable but may become portable at some point may also be integrated into a headset, cap, band, clips, etc.


The headset, cap, band, clips, comb, etc., may be configured in a very discrete manner. It should be noted that some components of a neuro-response data collection mechanism have not been shown for clarity. For example, a battery may be required to power components such as cameras and sensors and wiring from the battery are not shown. Similarly, a transceiver may include an antenna that is similarly not shown for clarity purposes.


In some examples a comb type distributed neuro-response data collection mechanism includes multiple EEG dry electrodes as shown in FIG. 1B. In the illustrated example, the comb structure includes four extensions. Each of the extensions has a respective radius of curvature. As shown in FIG. 1B, the respective radii of curvature are substantially the same. The comb structure also includes electrodes 161, 163, and 165. In particular embodiments, the EEG dry electrodes operate to detect neurological activity with minimal interference from hair. The EEG dry electrodes also do not require use of any electrically conductive gels. According to various embodiments, distributed neuro-response data collection mechanism also includes EOG sensors such as sensor 171 used to detect eye movements.


The data collection mechanism may also include a transmitter and/or receiver to send collected neuro-response data to a data analysis system. In some examples, a transceiver 191 transmits all collected media such as video and/or audio, neuro-response, and sensor data to a data analyzer. In other examples, a transceiver 191 transmits only interested data provided by a filter 193. In other examples, the transceiver 191 also receives information that can be provided to a user or used to modify a system. The filter 193 can remove noise as well as uninteresting portions of collected data. The filter 193 can significantly reduce network usage and can be valuable when limited network resources are available. In some examples, the transceiver can be connected to a computer system that then transmits data over a wide area network to a data analyzer. In other examples, the transceiver sends data over a wide area network to a data analyzer. Other components such as fMRI and MEG that are not yet portable but may become portable at some point may also be integrated into a headset, cap, band, clips, etc.



FIG. 2 illustrates one example of an electrode having multiple contacts and/or sensors. According to various embodiments, each contact 201, 203, 205, and 207 has a diameter of 0.05 mm-6 mm. In particular embodiments, each contact is cylindrical and has a spherical tip. In other examples, each contact or sensor has a rectangular cross section and a conical tip. Other cross sections and structures are possible. Smaller contacts more easily navigate through hair to reach the scalp surface. However, too small a contact leads to irritation, and a small contact still does not guarantee contact with the scalp.


Shielding is provided to reduce electromagnetic interference on electrode circuitry. According to various embodiments, selection circuitry 211 is provided to select the electrode having the highest signal quality. In some examples, hair follicles may prevent firm contact between particular sensors 201, 203, 205, and 207 and the scalp. In particular embodiments, selection circuitry 211 identifies the sensor providing the signal with the highest average amplitude. In other examples, selection circuitry 211 identifies the sensor providing the signal closest to the expected signal. In other examples, selection circuitry may not be provided and local selection of a sensor signal for a particular electrode may be performed by an EEG system after transmission of all signals to the EEG system.


According to various embodiments, a preamplifier 223 may be provided before or after selection circuitry to strengthen a signal detected by contacts 201, 203, 205, and/or 207. According to various embodiments, the pre-amplifier gain can be set to 2-50 kv/V for use with dry electrodes. Power source 221 may be a battery, a radio frequency power source, a piezo-electric power source, etc. In particular embodiments, a filter 231 may be a simple low pass, high pass, or band pass filter used to remove signals falling outside of the detectable EEG signal frequency ranges. In other examples, the filter can be used to remove known artifacts generated by movements such as jaw movements or blinking.


Transmitter 233 sends detected signals to an EEG system. In some examples, the transmitter 233 is a wired or wireless transceiver that digitizes signals and transmits them to a computing system after amplification and filtering. Wired systems may require extensive shielding particularly if the EEG electrodes are used in conjunction with other systems such as fMRI.



FIG. 3 illustrates one example of a group of electrodes having multiple contacts and/or sensors. According to various embodiments, each electrode 301, 321, and 341 includes corresponding skin and/or scalp contacts. Electrode 301 includes contacts 303, 305, and 307. Electrode 321 includes contacts 323, 325, and 327. Electrode 341 includes contacts 343, 345, and 347.


According to various embodiments, each contact has a size ranging from 0.1 mm-5 mm. In particular embodiments, each contact is cylindrical and has a spherical tip. In other examples, each contact or sensor has a rectangular cross section and a rectangular tip. A variety of configurations are possible. Smaller contacts more easily navigate through hair to reach the scalp surface. However, too small a contact leads to irritation, and a small contact still does not guarantee that it will reach the scalp.


Shielding is provided to reduce electromagnetic interference on electrode circuitry. According to various embodiments, each electrode 301, 321, and 341 includes corresponding selection circuitry 309, 329, and 349. In particular embodiments, selection circuitry 309, 329, and 349 identify locally preferred signals. In some examples, signals having good signal to noise characteristics are selected by selection circuitry 309, 329, and 349 at each electrode. In other examples, selection circuitry 309, 329, and 349 identify one or more signals providing the signal closest to the expected signal. In other examples, selection circuitry may not be provided and local selection of a sensor signal for a particular electrode may be performed by regional signal selection circuitry 363. According to various embodiments, selection circuitry 309, 329, and 349 select locally preferred signals while regional signal selection circuitry 363 select regionally preferred signals from a group of electrodes such as electrodes 301, 321, and 341.


According to various embodiments, amplifiers and/or preamplifiers 313, 333, and 353 may be provided before or after selection circuitry to strengthen a signal detected by contacts 303, 305, 307, 323, 325, 327, and 343, 345, and 347. According to various embodiments, the pre-amplifier gain can be set to 2-50 kv/V for use with dry electrodes. Power sources 311, 331, and 351 may be batteries, radio frequency power sources, piezo-electric power sources, etc. In particular embodiments, filters may also be provided. Filter 315, 335, and 355 may be low pass, high pass, band pass filters, etc., used to remove signals falling outside of the detectable EEG signal frequency ranges. In other examples, the filters can be used to remove known artifacts generated by movements such as jaw movements or blinking.


Transmitters 317, 337, and 357 send detected signals to an EEG system. In some examples, the transmitter 317, 337, and 357 are wired or wireless transceivers that digitize signals and transmit them to a computing system after amplification and filtering. The transceivers may also receive signals from an EEG system to dynamically modify frequency ranges detected or amplifier gains to be applied. Wired systems may require extensive shielding particular if the EEG electrodes are used in conjunction with other systems such as fMRI. According to various embodiments, individual electrodes 301, 321, and 341 are arranged on a jagged structure electrode housing structure 371. According to various embodiments, the jagged structure 371 is a longitudinally or latitudinally arranged zig zag or wave structure configured to displace as much hair as possible as EEG electrodes are placed on the scalp. Zig zag configurations may be horizontally or vertically placed. An EEG system may also include a receiver 361 to obtain signals from individual electrodes 301, 321, and 341. Regional signal selection circuitry 363 selects preferred signals from groups of electrodes. According to various embodiments, hundreds of electrodes and thousands of contacts may be placed on an individual scalp, and the regional signal selection circuitry 363 remove signals from sensors having poor or fluctuating contact with the scalp. In other examples, far fewer or a far greater number of electrodes can be used.


The locally selected and the regionally selected signals are provided to a data analyzer 365. Data analysis may include intra-modality response synthesis and cross-modality response synthesis to enhance effectiveness measures. It should be noted that in some particular instances, one type of synthesis may be performed without performing other types of synthesis. For example, cross-modality response synthesis may be performed with or without intra-modality synthesis.



FIG. 4A illustrates one mechanism for selecting a local signal. At 401, reference signals are obtained. According to various embodiments, reference signals may be ground signals used as a reference point for measured signals. At 403, controlled stimulus materials are provided. In particular embodiments, controlled stimulus materials are materials known to elicit particular neurological responses. In other examples, stimulus materials for analysis are provided. At 405, signals are obtained from multiple contacts associated with an electrode. In particular embodiments, each electrode includes multiple contacts arranged in a tooth shaped support structure to allow effective scalp contact through hair.


According to various embodiments, the worst signals are removed at 407. In particular embodiments, signals showing amplifier blocking characteristics are removed. Anything having a significant amount of high frequency noise, (e.g. >40 Hz) can also be eliminated. In some examples, anything pinning characteristics associated with constant decreasing amplitude are removed as the decrease in amplitude may indicate imminent detachment of the contact from the scalp. In other embodiments, having low signal to noise ratios are disregarded. In still other embodiments, signals having poor drift and jitter characteristics are removed. At 413, remaining contacts are averaged to provide a local signal. In some examples, signals from four remaining contacts are averaged to provide an aggregated signal. A selection, averaging, or other combination of signals is referred to herein as an aggregated signal. In some examples, two signals having good characteristics are averaged to provide an aggregated signal.



FIG. 4B illustrates another mechanism for selecting a local signal. At 451, reference signals are obtained. According to various embodiments, reference signals may be ground signals used as a reference point for measured signals. At 453, controlled stimulus materials are provided. In particular embodiments, controlled stimulus materials are materials known to elicit particular neurological responses. In other examples, stimulus materials for analysis are provided. At 455, signals are obtained from multiple contacts associated with an electrode. In particular embodiments, each electrode includes multiple contacts arranged in a tooth shaped support structure to allow effective scalp contact through hair.


According to various embodiments, local signals with the closest correlation to expected signals are identified at 457. In particular embodiments, signals having the highest average amplitude at determined at 459. Signals having the highest signal to noise ratio may also be identified at 461. At 463, a contact providing the local signal is selected.



FIG. 5 illustrates one mechanism for selecting a local and regional signal. At 501, select local signals are obtained. According to various embodiments, local signals having poor characteristics are removed at 503. In particular embodiments, signals associated with amplifier blocking or pinning are removed. Signals showing characteristics corresponding with imminent detachment of the contact from the scalp may also be removed 505. In other embodiments, signals having low signal to noise ratios are disregarded. At signals having the highest average amplitude may be determined. Signals having the highest signal to noise ratio may also be identified. At 507, regional signals are selected from electrodes in the same electrode housing. According to various embodiments, each electrode housing may include 2-10 electrodes, where each individual electrode includes multiple contacts.


Each electrode housing may be a zigzag, rectangular, cylindrical, comb, etc. type structure arranged to allow electrode contact with the scalp with minimal interference from hair. In particular embodiments, each housing ranges from 0.2 mm to 2 cm in length, 1 mm to 1 cm in width, and 0.2 mm to 2 cm in thickness. In other particular embodiments, each housing ranges from 1 mm to 3 cm in diameter and 1.1 mm to 2 cm in thickness. Configurations may vary widely depending on manufacturing technologies and materials. According to various embodiments, the non-eliminated signals or selected signals are averaged at 509. In some examples, one signal may be selected as the desired signal, although taking remaining selected signals from the housing may allow for further noise reduction. At 511, selected, averaged, and/or aggregated signals from the electrode housing are sent for analysis.



FIG. 6 illustrates one example of neuro-response data collection using dry electrodes. At 601, user information is received from a subject provided with a neuro-response data collection mechanism. According to various embodiments, the subject sends data including age, gender, income, location, interest, ethnicity, etc. after being provided with an EEG cap including EEG electrodes, EOG sensors, cameras, recorders, network interfaces, and a global position system (GPS) device integrated into an unobtrusive device that can be worn during typical activities.


At 603, neuro-response data, video and audio recorded data, timing information, and/or location information, etc., is received from the subject neuro-response data collection mechanism. According to various embodiments, EEG, EOG, pupillary dilation, facial emotion encoding data, video, images, audio, GPS data, timestamps, etc., are transmitted from the subject to a neuro-response data analyzer. In particular embodiments, data is filtered and compressed prior to transmission. For example, only video and audio corresponding to neuro-logically salient events are transmitted to save on network bandwidth. According to various embodiments, neuro-response and associated data is transmitted directly from an EEG cap wide area network interface to a data analyzer. In particular embodiments, neuro-response and associated data is transmitted to a computer system that then performs compression and filtering of the data before transmitting the data to a data analyzer over a network.


According to various embodiments, data is also passed through a data cleanser to remove noise and artifacts that may make data more difficult to interpret. According to various embodiments, the data cleanser removes EEG electrical activity associated with blinking and other endogenous/exogenous artifacts. Data cleansing may be performed before or after data transmission to a data analyzer.


At 605, stimulus material is identified. According to various embodiments, stimulus material is identified based on user input. For example, a user watching a particular movie may enter the title of the movie along with how and where it was viewed. Alternatively, video recording may be analyzed using text, facial, brand, video, image, and audio recognition algorithms to determine what the user was viewing. Eye tracking movements can determine where user attention is focused at any given time. Although that eye movements do occur when attention is diverted, it is recognized that focused attention typically occurs when eye position is focused in the forward direction. Consequently, the EEG cap and video camera direction typically coincide with the direction of user attention. EEG data may also be tagged to indicate correspondence with particular video and audio events. According to various embodiments, a user walking down a supermarket aisle may direct attention to certain products that are identified using video recordings and correlated with neuro-response measures to determine the effectiveness of product labeling.


At 607, neuro-response data is synchronized with timing, location, and other stimulus material data. According to various embodiments, neuro-response data such as EEG and EOG data is tagged to indicate what the subject is viewing or listening to at a particular time.


At 609, data analysis is performed. Data analysis may include intra-modality response synthesis and cross-modality response synthesis to enhance effectiveness measures. It should be noted that in some particular instances, one type of synthesis may be performed without performing other types of synthesis. For example, cross-modality response synthesis may be performed with or without intra-modality synthesis.


A variety of mechanisms can be used to perform data analysis 609. In particular embodiments, a stimulus attributes repository is accessed to obtain attributes and characteristics of the stimulus materials, along with purposes, intents, objectives, etc. In particular embodiments, EEG response data is synthesized to provide an enhanced assessment of effectiveness. According to various embodiments, EEG measures electrical activity resulting from thousands of simultaneous neural processes associated with different portions of the brain. EEG data can be classified in various bands. According to various embodiments, brainwave frequencies include delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency ranges. Delta waves are classified as those less than 4 Hz and are prominent during deep sleep. Theta waves have frequencies between 3.5 to 7.5 Hz and are associated with memories, attention, emotions, and sensations. Theta waves are typically prominent during states of internal focus.


Alpha frequencies reside between 7.5 and 13 Hz and typically peak around 10 Hz. Alpha waves are prominent during states of relaxation. Beta waves have a frequency range between 14 and 30 Hz. Beta waves are prominent during states of motor control, long range synchronization between brain areas, analytical problem solving, judgment, and decision making. Gamma waves occur between 30 and 60 Hz and are involved in binding of different populations of neurons together into a network for the purpose of carrying out a certain cognitive or motor function, as well as in attention and memory. Because the skull and dermal layers attenuate waves in this frequency range, brain waves above 75-80 Hz are difficult to detect and are often not used for stimuli response assessment.


However, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention recognize that analyzing high gamma band (kappa-band: Above 60 Hz) measurements, in addition to theta, alpha, beta, and low gamma band measurements, enhances neurological attention, emotional engagement and retention component estimates. In particular embodiments, EEG measurements including difficult to detect high gamma or kappa band measurements are obtained, enhanced, and evaluated. Subject and task specific signature sub-bands in the theta, alpha, beta, gamma and kappa bands are identified to provide enhanced response estimates. According to various embodiments, high gamma waves (kappa-band) above 80 Hz (typically detectable with sub-cranial EEG and/or magnetoencephalograophy) can be used in inverse model-based enhancement of the frequency responses to the stimuli.


Various embodiments of the present invention recognize that particular sub-bands within each frequency range have particular prominence during certain activities. A subset of the frequencies in a particular band is referred to herein as a sub-band. For example, a sub-band may include the 40-45 Hz range within the gamma band. In particular embodiments, multiple sub-bands within the different bands are selected while remaining frequencies are band pass filtered. In particular embodiments, multiple sub-band responses may be enhanced, while the remaining frequency responses may be attenuated.


An information theory based band-weighting model is used for adaptive extraction of selective dataset specific, subject specific, task specific bands to enhance the effectiveness measure. Adaptive extraction may be performed using fuzzy scaling. Stimuli can be presented and enhanced measurements determined multiple times to determine the variation profiles across multiple presentations. Determining various profiles provides an enhanced assessment of the primary responses as well as the longevity (wear-out) of the marketing and entertainment stimuli. The synchronous response of multiple individuals to stimuli presented in concert is measured to determine an enhanced across subject synchrony measure of effectiveness. According to various embodiments, the synchronous response may be determined for multiple subjects residing in separate locations or for multiple subjects residing in the same location.


Although a variety of synthesis mechanisms are described, it should be recognized that any number of mechanisms can be applied—in sequence or in parallel with or without interaction between the mechanisms.


Although intra-modality synthesis mechanisms provide enhanced significance data, additional cross-modality synthesis mechanisms can also be applied. A variety of mechanisms such as EEG, Eye Tracking, GSR, EOG, and facial emotion encoding are connected to a cross-modality synthesis mechanism. Other mechanisms as well as variations and enhancements on existing mechanisms may also be included. According to various embodiments, data from a specific modality can be enhanced using data from one or more other modalities. In particular embodiments, EEG typically makes frequency measurements in different bands like alpha, beta and gamma to provide estimates of significance. However, the techniques of the present invention recognize that significance measures can be enhanced further using information from other modalities.


For example, facial emotion encoding measures can be used to enhance the valence of the EEG emotional engagement measure. EOG and eye tracking saccadic measures of object entities can be used to enhance the EEG estimates of significance including but not limited to attention, emotional engagement, and memory retention. According to various embodiments, a cross-modality synthesis mechanism performs time and phase shifting of data to allow data from different modalities to align. In some examples, it is recognized that an EEG response will often occur hundreds of milliseconds before a facial emotion measurement changes. Correlations can be drawn and time and phase shifts made on an individual as well as a group basis. In other examples, saccadic eye movements may be determined as occurring before and after particular EEG responses. According to various embodiments, time corrected GSR measures are used to scale and enhance the EEG estimates of significance including attention, emotional engagement and memory retention measures.


Evidence of the occurrence or non-occurrence of specific time domain difference event-related potential components (like the DERP) in specific regions correlates with subject responsiveness to specific stimulus. According to various embodiments, ERP measures are enhanced using EEG time-frequency measures (ERPSP) in response to the presentation of the marketing and entertainment stimuli. Specific portions are extracted and isolated to identify ERP, DERP and ERPSP analyses to perform. In particular embodiments, an EEG frequency estimation of attention, emotion and memory retention (ERPSP) is used as a co-factor in enhancing the ERP, DERP and time-domain response analysis.


EOG measures saccades to determine the presence of attention to specific objects of stimulus. Eye tracking measures the subject's gaze path, location and dwell on specific objects of stimulus. According to various embodiments, EOG and eye tracking is enhanced by measuring the presence of lambda waves (a neurophysiological index of saccade effectiveness) in the ongoing EEG in the occipital and extra striate regions, triggered by the slope of saccade-onset to estimate the significance of the EOG and eye tracking measures. In particular embodiments, specific EEG signatures of activity such as slow potential shifts and measures of coherence in time-frequency responses at the Frontal Eye Field (FEF) regions that preceded saccade-onset are measured to enhance the effectiveness of the saccadic activity data.


According to various embodiments, facial emotion encoding uses templates generated by measuring facial muscle positions and movements of individuals expressing various emotions prior to the testing session. These individual specific facial emotion encoding templates are matched with the individual responses to identify subject emotional response. In particular embodiments, these facial emotion encoding measurements are enhanced by evaluating inter-hemispherical asymmetries in EEG responses in specific frequency bands and measuring frequency band interactions. The techniques of the present invention recognize that not only are particular frequency bands significant in EEG responses, but particular frequency bands used for communication between particular areas of the brain are significant. Consequently, these EEG responses enhance the EMG, graphic and video based facial emotion identification.


Integrated responses are generated at 611. According to various embodiments, the data communication device transmits data to the response integration using protocols such as the File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) along with a variety of conventional, bus, wired network, wireless network, satellite, and proprietary communication protocols. The data transmitted can include the data in its entirety, excerpts of data, converted data, and/or elicited response measures. According to various embodiments, data is sent using a telecommunications, wireless, Internet, satellite, or any other communication mechanisms that is capable of conveying information from multiple subject locations for data integration and analysis. The mechanism may be integrated in a set top box, computer system, receiver, mobile device, etc.


In particular embodiments, the data communication device sends data to the response integration system. According to various embodiments, the response integration system combines analyzed and enhanced responses to the stimulus material while using information about stimulus material attributes. In particular embodiments, the response integration system also collects and integrates user behavioral and survey responses with the analyzed and enhanced response data to more effectively measure and track distributed neuro-responses to stimulus materials. According to various embodiments, the response integration system obtains attributes such as requirements and purposes of the stimulus material presented.


Some of these requirements and purposes may be obtained from a variety of databases. According to various embodiments, the response integration system also includes mechanisms for the collection and storage of demographic, statistical and/or survey based responses to different entertainment, marketing, advertising and other audio/visual/tactile/olfactory material. If this information is stored externally, the response integration system can include a mechanism for the push and/or pull integration of the data, such as querying, extraction, recording, modification, and/or updating.


The response integration system can further include an adaptive learning component that refines user or group profiles and tracks variations in the distributed neuro-response data collection system to particular stimuli or series of stimuli over time. This information can be made available for other purposes, such as use of the information for presentation attribute decision making. According to various embodiments, the response integration system builds and uses responses of users having similar profiles and demographics to provide integrated responses at 611. In particular embodiments, stimulus and response data is stored in a repository at 613 for later retrieval and analysis.


According to various embodiments, various mechanisms such as the data collection mechanisms, the intra-modality synthesis mechanisms, cross-modality synthesis mechanisms, etc. are implemented on multiple devices. However, it is also possible that the various mechanisms be implemented in hardware, firmware, and/or software in a single system. FIG. 7 provides one example of a system that can be used to implement one or more mechanisms. For example, the system shown in FIG. 7 may be used to implement a data analyzer.


According to particular example embodiments, a system 700 suitable for implementing particular embodiments of the present invention includes a processor 701, a memory 703, an interface 711, and a bus 715 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the processor 701 is responsible for such tasks such as pattern generation. Various specially configured devices can also be used in place of a processor 701 or in addition to processor 701. The complete implementation can also be done in custom hardware. The interface 711 is typically configured to send and receive data packets or data segments over a network. Particular examples of interfaces the device supports include host bus adapter (HBA) interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like.


In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as data synthesis.


According to particular example embodiments, the system 700 uses memory 703 to store data, algorithms and program instructions. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store received data and process received data.


Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement the systems/methods described herein, the present invention relates to tangible, machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks and DVDs; magneto-optical media such as optical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.


Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Therefore, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a comb having a comb base, a first extension, and a second extension, the first extension and the second extension extending from the comb base, the comb base including a sensor to detect eye movement, the sensor disposed on an end of the comb base;a first electrode carried by the first extension, the first electrode including a first transceiver to receive a first control signal;a first filter communicatively coupled to the first transceiver to automatically dynamically modify a first frequency range of signals to be detected by the first electrode in response to the first control signal;a second electrode carried by the second extension, the second electrode including a second transceiver to receive a second control signal;a second filter communicatively coupled to the second transceiver to automatically dynamically modify a second frequency range of signals to be detected by the second electrode in response to the second control signal;a third electrode carried by the comb base, the third electrode including a third transceiver to receive a third control signal; anda third filter communicatively coupled to the third transceiver to automatically dynamically modify a third frequency range of signals to be detected by the third electrode in response to the third control signal;wherein at least one of the first control signal received by the first transceiver, the second control signal received by the second transceiver, or the third control signal received by the third transceiver is based on at least one of (a) a region of detection of the first electrode, (b) a region of detection of the second electrode, and (c) a region of detection of the third electrode.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first extension and the second extension have a non-linear shape.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the third electrode has a plurality of contacts.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein at least one of the contacts has a rectangular cross-section and a conical tip.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first extension has a pointed tip, the first extension including a plurality of electrodes, the first electrode and the plurality of electrodes spaced from the pointed tip.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first extension has a first radius of curvature and the second extension has a second radius of curvature substantially the same as the first radius of curvature.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a third extension and a fourth electrode carried by the third extension.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, further including a fifth electrode carried by the first extension, a sixth electrode carried by the second extension, a seventh electrode carried by the third extension, and an eighth electrode carried by the comb base.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the first extension has a first radius of curvature, the second extension has a second radius of curvature substantially the same as the first radius of curvature, and the third extension has a third radius of curvature substantially the same as the first radius of curvature.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, further including a fifth electrode carried by the first extension, a sixth electrode carried by the second extension, a seventh electrode carried by the third extension, and an eighth electrode carried by the comb base.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the first electrode on the first extension is spaced from the second extension a first distance, and the fifth electrode on the first extension is spaced from the second extension the first distance.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first electrode further includes: a first contact point to gather a first signal from a subject;a second contact point to gather a second signal from the subject;a third contact point to gather a third signal from the subject; anda selector to (1) discard one of the first signal, the second signal or the third signal based on a first characteristic of the first signal, a second characteristic of the second signal and a third characteristic of the third signal, and to (2) combine two of the first signal, the second signal and the third signal to form the first control signal, the two of the first signal, the second signal and the third signal excluding the discarded one of the first signal, the second signal and the third signal.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first electrode, the second electrode, and the third electrode are disposed in a zig zag arrangement.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first extension and the second extension have tapered ends opposite the comb base.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein each of the first, second, and third electrodes includes a plurality of contacts, the plurality of contacts coated with one or more of a layer of titanium oxide or a layer of silicon nitride to enable navigation through hair of a subject.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein each layer of the one or more layers has a thickness of 50-250 nanometers (nm).
  • 17. An apparatus to gather neurological signals from a surface of a head of a subject, the apparatus comprising: a comb including a comb base, a first extension coupled to the comb base, and a second extension coupled to the comb base, the first extension having a first tapered end opposite the comb base to navigate on the surface of the head through hair, and the second extension having a second tapered end to navigate on the surface of the head through the hair;a sensor disposed on an end of the comb base to detect eye movement;a first electrode carried by the first extension, the first electrode to gather a first neurological signal;a second electrode carried by the first extension, the second electrode to gather a second neurological signal; anda third electrode carried by the comb base, the third electrode to gather a third neurological signal.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the first electrode includes a plurality of contact points and selection circuitry, the selection circuitry to select data from a first contact point of the plurality of contact points as the first neurological signal.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 17, further including: a third extension coupled to the comb base, the third extension having a third tapered end opposite the comb base to navigate on the surface through the hair; anda fourth electrode carried by the third extension, the fourth electrode to gather a fourth neurological signal,wherein the first extension has a first radius of curvature, the second extension has a second radius of curvature substantially the same as the first radius of curvature, and the third extension has a third radius of curvature substantially the same as the first radius of curvature.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the comb base has a fourth radius of curvature different from the first radius of curvature.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the first extension, second extension, and third extension curve in a first direction, and the comb base curves in a second direction different from the first direction.
US Referenced Citations (702)
Number Name Date Kind
2549836 McIntyre et al. Apr 1951 A
3490439 Rolston Jan 1970 A
3572322 Wade Mar 1971 A
3735753 Pisarski May 1973 A
3880144 Coursin et al. Apr 1975 A
3901215 John Aug 1975 A
3998213 Price Dec 1976 A
4075657 Weinblatt Feb 1978 A
4145122 Rinard et al. Mar 1979 A
4149716 Scudder Apr 1979 A
4201224 John May 1980 A
4279258 John Jul 1981 A
4411273 John Oct 1983 A
4417592 John Nov 1983 A
4537198 Corbett Aug 1985 A
4557270 John Dec 1985 A
4610259 Cohen et al. Sep 1986 A
4613951 Chu Sep 1986 A
4626904 Lurie Dec 1986 A
4632122 Johansson et al. Dec 1986 A
4683892 Johansson et al. Aug 1987 A
4686999 Snyder et al. Aug 1987 A
4695879 Weinblatt Sep 1987 A
4736751 Gevins et al. Apr 1988 A
4800888 Itil et al. Jan 1989 A
4802484 Friedman et al. Feb 1989 A
4846190 John Jul 1989 A
4859050 Borah et al. Aug 1989 A
4870579 Hey Sep 1989 A
4885687 Carey Dec 1989 A
4894777 Negishi et al. Jan 1990 A
4913160 John Apr 1990 A
4967038 Gevins et al. Oct 1990 A
4955388 Silberstein Nov 1990 A
4973149 Hutchinson Nov 1990 A
4987903 Keppel et al. Jan 1991 A
5003986 Finitzo et al. Apr 1991 A
5010891 Chamoun Apr 1991 A
5038782 Gevins et al. Aug 1991 A
5052401 Sherwin Oct 1991 A
5083571 Prichep Jan 1992 A
RE34015 Duffy Aug 1992 E
5137027 Rosenfeld Aug 1992 A
5213338 Brotz May 1993 A
5226177 Nickerson Jul 1993 A
5243517 Schmidt et al. Sep 1993 A
5273037 Itil et al. Dec 1993 A
5291888 Tucker Mar 1994 A
5293867 Oommen Mar 1994 A
5295491 Gevins Mar 1994 A
5331544 Lu et al. Jul 1994 A
5339826 Schmidt et al. Aug 1994 A
5345281 Taboada et al. Sep 1994 A
5357957 Itil et al. Oct 1994 A
5363858 Farwell Nov 1994 A
5392788 Hudspeth Feb 1995 A
5406956 Farwell Apr 1995 A
5410609 Kado et al. Apr 1995 A
5436830 Zaltman Jul 1995 A
5447166 Gevins Sep 1995 A
5450855 Rosenfeld Sep 1995 A
5474082 Junker Dec 1995 A
5479934 Imran Jan 1996 A
5513649 Gevins et al. May 1996 A
5518007 Becker May 1996 A
5537618 Boulton et al. Jul 1996 A
5550928 Lu et al. Aug 1996 A
5617855 Waletzky et al. Apr 1997 A
5655534 Ilmoniemi Aug 1997 A
5676138 Zawilinski Oct 1997 A
5676148 Koo et al. Oct 1997 A
5687322 Deaton et al. Nov 1997 A
5720619 Fisslinger Feb 1998 A
5724987 Gevins et al. Mar 1998 A
5726701 Needham Mar 1998 A
5729205 Kwon Mar 1998 A
5736986 Sever, Jr. Apr 1998 A
5740035 Cohen et al. Apr 1998 A
5762611 Lewis et al. Jun 1998 A
5771897 Zufrin Jun 1998 A
5774591 Black et al. Jun 1998 A
5787187 Bouchard et al. Jul 1998 A
5800351 Mann Sep 1998 A
5802208 Podilchuk et al. Sep 1998 A
5802220 Black et al. Sep 1998 A
5812642 Leroy Sep 1998 A
5817029 Gevins et al. Oct 1998 A
5842199 Miller et al. Nov 1998 A
5848399 Burke Dec 1998 A
5892566 Bullwinkel Apr 1999 A
5945863 Coy Aug 1999 A
5961332 Joao Oct 1999 A
5974262 Fuller et al. Oct 1999 A
5983129 Cowan et al. Nov 1999 A
5995868 Dorfmeister et al. Nov 1999 A
6001065 DeVito Dec 1999 A
6016475 Miller et al. Jan 2000 A
6021346 Ryu et al. Feb 2000 A
6032129 Greef et al. Feb 2000 A
6052619 John Apr 2000 A
6088040 Oda et al. Jul 2000 A
6099319 Zaltman Aug 2000 A
6120440 Goknar Sep 2000 A
6128521 Marro et al. Oct 2000 A
6154669 Hunter et al. Nov 2000 A
6155927 Levasseur et al. Dec 2000 A
6161030 Levendowski et al. Dec 2000 A
6170018 Voll et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171239 Humphrey Jan 2001 B1
6173260 Slaney Jan 2001 B1
6175753 Menkes et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182113 Narayanaswami Jan 2001 B1
6190314 Ark et al. Feb 2001 B1
6212502 Ball et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228038 Claessens May 2001 B1
6236885 Hunter et al. May 2001 B1
6236975 Boe et al. May 2001 B1
6254536 DeVito Jul 2001 B1
6280198 Calhoun et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286005 Cannon Sep 2001 B1
6289234 Mueller Sep 2001 B1
6292688 Patton Sep 2001 B1
6299308 Voronka et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301492 Zonenshayn Oct 2001 B1
6301493 Marro et al. Oct 2001 B1
6315569 Zaltman Nov 2001 B1
6330470 Tucker et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334778 Brown Jan 2002 B1
6358201 Childre et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370513 Kolawa et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374143 Berrang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381481 Levendowski et al. Apr 2002 B1
6398643 Knowles et al. Jun 2002 B1
6422999 Hill Jul 2002 B1
6434419 Gevins et al. Aug 2002 B1
6435878 Reynolds et al. Aug 2002 B1
6453194 Hill Sep 2002 B1
6453241 Bassett, Jr. et al. Sep 2002 B1
6487444 Mimura Nov 2002 B2
6488617 Katz Dec 2002 B1
6510340 Jordan Jan 2003 B1
6520905 Surve et al. Feb 2003 B1
6545685 Dorbie Apr 2003 B1
6575902 Burton Jun 2003 B1
6577329 Flickner et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585521 Obrador Jul 2003 B1
6594521 Tucker Jul 2003 B2
6598006 Honda et al. Jul 2003 B1
6609024 Ryu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6648822 Hamamoto et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652283 Van Schaack et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654626 Devlin et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662052 Sarwal et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665560 Becker et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678685 McGill et al. Jan 2004 B2
6688890 von Buegner Feb 2004 B2
6708051 Durousseau Mar 2004 B1
6712468 Edwards Mar 2004 B1
6754524 Johnson, Jr. Jun 2004 B2
6757556 Gopenathan et al. Jun 2004 B2
6788882 Geer et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792304 Silberstein Sep 2004 B1
6842877 Robarts et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850252 Hoffberg Feb 2005 B1
6852875 Prakash Feb 2005 B2
6888457 Wilkinson et al. May 2005 B2
6904408 McCarthy et al. Jun 2005 B1
6950698 Sarkela et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958710 Zhang et al. Oct 2005 B2
6973342 Swanson Dec 2005 B1
6993380 Modarres Jan 2006 B1
7020508 Stivoric et al. Mar 2006 B2
7043056 Edwards et al. May 2006 B2
7047550 Yasukawa et al. May 2006 B1
7113916 Hill Sep 2006 B1
7120880 Dryer et al. Oct 2006 B1
7130673 Tolvanen-Laakso et al. Oct 2006 B2
7150715 Collura et al. Dec 2006 B2
7164967 Etienne-Cummings et al. Jan 2007 B2
7177675 Suffin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7222071 Neuhauser et al. May 2007 B2
7246081 Hill Jul 2007 B2
7249708 McConnell et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272982 Neuhauser et al. Sep 2007 B2
7286871 Cohen Oct 2007 B2
7340060 Tomkins et al. Mar 2008 B2
7359894 Liebman et al. Apr 2008 B1
7391835 Gross et al. Jun 2008 B1
7394385 Franco et al. Jul 2008 B2
7408460 Crystal et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420464 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2008 B2
7443292 Jensen et al. Oct 2008 B2
7460827 Schuster et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463143 Forr et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463144 Crystal et al. Dec 2008 B2
7471987 Crystal et al. Dec 2008 B2
7483835 Neuhauser et al. Jan 2009 B2
7483844 Takakura et al. Jan 2009 B2
7496400 Hoskonen et al. Feb 2009 B2
7548774 Kurtz et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551952 Gevins et al. Jun 2009 B2
7592908 Zhang et al. Sep 2009 B2
7614066 Urdang et al. Nov 2009 B2
7623823 Zito et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630757 Dorfmeister et al. Dec 2009 B2
7636456 Collins et al. Dec 2009 B2
7641341 Weinblatt Jan 2010 B2
7650793 Jensen et al. Jan 2010 B2
7658327 Tuchman et al. Feb 2010 B2
7689272 Farwell Mar 2010 B2
7697979 Martinerie et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698238 Barletta et al. Apr 2010 B2
7720351 Levitan May 2010 B2
7729755 Laken Jun 2010 B2
7765564 Deng Jul 2010 B2
7774052 Burton et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797186 Dybus Sep 2010 B2
7809420 Hannula et al. Oct 2010 B2
7840248 Fuchs et al. Nov 2010 B2
7840250 Tucker Nov 2010 B2
7844484 Arnett et al. Nov 2010 B2
7865394 Calloway Jan 2011 B1
7892764 Xiong et al. Feb 2011 B2
7895075 Gettys et al. Feb 2011 B2
7895625 Bryan et al. Feb 2011 B1
7908133 Neuhauser Mar 2011 B2
7917366 Levanon et al. Mar 2011 B1
7930199 Hill Apr 2011 B1
7962315 Jensen et al. Jun 2011 B2
7974889 Raimbeault Jul 2011 B2
7988557 Soderland Aug 2011 B2
8014847 Shastri et al. Sep 2011 B2
8027518 Baker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8060795 Bakekolo et al. Nov 2011 B2
8065203 Chien et al. Nov 2011 B1
8069125 Jung et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073707 Teller et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079054 Dhawan et al. Dec 2011 B1
8082215 Jung et al. Dec 2011 B2
8086563 Jung et al. Dec 2011 B2
8098152 Zhang et al. Jan 2012 B2
8099315 Amento et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103328 Turner et al. Jan 2012 B2
8126220 Greig Feb 2012 B2
8135606 Dupree Mar 2012 B2
8151298 Begeja et al. Apr 2012 B2
8165916 Hoffberg et al. Apr 2012 B2
8196168 Bryan et al. Jun 2012 B1
8200775 Moore Jun 2012 B2
8209224 Pradeep et al. Jun 2012 B2
8219438 Moon et al. Jul 2012 B1
8229469 Zhang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8235725 Hill Aug 2012 B1
8239030 Hagedorn et al. Aug 2012 B1
8255267 Breiter Aug 2012 B2
8270814 Pradeep et al. Sep 2012 B2
8296172 Marci et al. Oct 2012 B2
8300526 Saito et al. Oct 2012 B2
8326002 Hill Dec 2012 B2
8327395 Lee Dec 2012 B2
8332883 Lee Dec 2012 B2
8335715 Pradeep et al. Dec 2012 B2
8381244 King Feb 2013 B2
8386312 Pradeep et al. Feb 2013 B2
8386313 Pradeep et al. Feb 2013 B2
8388165 Zhang Mar 2013 B2
8392250 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8392251 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8392253 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8392254 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8392255 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8396744 Pradeep et al. Mar 2013 B2
8473345 Pradeep et al. Jun 2013 B2
8484801 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494610 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494905 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 B2
8533042 Pradeep et al. Sep 2013 B2
8548852 Pradeep et al. Oct 2013 B2
8561095 Dimitrova et al. Oct 2013 B2
8600100 Hill Dec 2013 B2
8635105 Pradeep et al. Jan 2014 B2
8655428 Pradeep et al. Feb 2014 B2
8655437 Pradeep et al. Feb 2014 B2
8764652 Lee et al. Jul 2014 B2
8788372 Kettner et al. Jul 2014 B2
8793715 Weitzenfeld et al. Jul 2014 B1
9021515 Lee et al. Apr 2015 B2
9336535 Pradeep et al. May 2016 B2
9560984 Pradeep et al. Feb 2017 B2
9886981 Pradeep et al. Feb 2018 B2
9894399 Lee et al. Feb 2018 B2
10127572 Pradeep et al. Nov 2018 B2
10140628 Pradeep et al. Nov 2018 B2
10269036 Knight et al. Apr 2019 B2
10580031 Pradeep et al. Mar 2020 B2
10679241 Pradeep et al. Jun 2020 B2
10937051 Pradeep et al. Mar 2021
20010013009 Greening et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010020236 Cannon Sep 2001 A1
20010029468 Yamaguchi et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032140 Hoffman Oct 2001 A1
20010056225 DeVito Dec 2001 A1
20020053076 Landesmann May 2002 A1
20020055857 Mault May 2002 A1
20020056087 Berezowski et al. May 2002 A1
20020056124 Hay May 2002 A1
20020059577 Lu et al. May 2002 A1
20020065826 Bell et al. May 2002 A1
20020072952 Hamzy et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077534 DuRousseau Jun 2002 A1
20020082902 Ando et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020103429 deCharms Aug 2002 A1
20020111796 Nemoto Aug 2002 A1
20020116042 Boling Aug 2002 A1
20020143627 Barsade et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020155878 Lert, Jr. et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156842 Signes et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169665 Hughes et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178440 Agnihotri et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188216 Kayyali et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188217 Farwell Dec 2002 A1
20020193670 Garfield et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030013981 Gevins et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030036955 Tanaka et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037333 Ghashghai et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030044050 Clark et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030059750 Bindler et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063222 Creed et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030065524 Giacchetti et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073921 Sohmer et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030081834 Philomin et al. May 2003 A1
20030093792 Labeeb et al. May 2003 A1
20030100998 Brunner et al. May 2003 A2
20030104865 Itkis et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131351 Shapira Jul 2003 A1
20030149344 Nizan Aug 2003 A1
20030165270 Endrikhovski et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177488 Smith et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030204412 Brier Oct 2003 A1
20030208754 Sridhar et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233278 Marshall Dec 2003 A1
20040001616 Gutta et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040005143 Tsuru et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040013398 Miura et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015608 Ellis et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040055448 Byon Mar 2004 A1
20040068431 Smith et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073129 Caldwell et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088289 Xu et al. May 2004 A1
20040092809 DeCharms May 2004 A1
20040098298 Yin May 2004 A1
20040101212 Fedorovskaya et al. May 2004 A1
20040133081 Teller et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040187167 Maguire et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193068 Burton et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210159 Kibar et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219184 Brown et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220483 Yeo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236623 Gopalakrishnan Nov 2004 A1
20050010475 Perkowski et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050041951 Inoue et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043646 Viirre et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060312 Curtiss et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050062637 El Zabadani et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071462 Bodin et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071865 Martins Mar 2005 A1
20050076359 Pierson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050079474 Lowe Apr 2005 A1
20050097594 O'Donnell et al. May 2005 A1
20050107716 Eaton et al. May 2005 A1
20050108092 Campbell et al. May 2005 A1
20050113649 Bergantino May 2005 A1
20050132401 Boccon-Gibod et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143629 Farwell Jun 2005 A1
20050149964 Thomas et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154290 Langleben Jul 2005 A1
20050165766 Szabo Jul 2005 A1
20050177058 Sobell Aug 2005 A1
20050197590 Osorio et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203798 Jensen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216071 Devlin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216243 Graham et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223237 Barletta et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050227233 Buxton et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240956 Smith et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246002 Martinez Nov 2005 A1
20050256905 Gruhl et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261980 Hadi Nov 2005 A1
20050267798 Panara Dec 2005 A1
20050272017 Neuhauser et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273017 Gordon Dec 2005 A1
20050273802 Crystal et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288954 McCarthy et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289582 Tavares et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060003732 Neuhauser et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009702 Iwaki et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010470 Kurosaki Jan 2006 A1
20060035707 Nguyen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041548 Parsons et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060042483 Work et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053110 McDonald et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069663 Adar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060093998 Vertegaal May 2006 A1
20060094934 Shirai et al. May 2006 A1
20060111044 Keller May 2006 A1
20060111644 Guttag et al. May 2006 A1
20060129458 Maggio Jun 2006 A1
20060167376 Viirre et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168613 Wood et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168630 Davies Jul 2006 A1
20060176289 Horn Aug 2006 A1
20060189886 Jones et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190822 Basson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060218046 Carfi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060256133 Rosenberg Nov 2006 A1
20060257834 Lee et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259360 Flinn et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259371 Perrier et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293921 McCarthy et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005752 Chawla et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016096 McNabb Jan 2007 A1
20070038516 Apple et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070048707 Caamano et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050256 Walker et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055169 Lee et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070060830 Le et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070060831 Le et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066874 Cook Mar 2007 A1
20070066915 Frei et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066916 Lemos Mar 2007 A1
20070067007 Schulman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067305 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070078700 Lenzmann et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078706 Datta et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079331 Datta et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101360 Gutta et al. May 2007 A1
20070104369 Weatherhead May 2007 A1
20070106170 Dunseath, Jr. et al. May 2007 A1
20070112460 Kiselik May 2007 A1
20070135727 Virtanen et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135728 Snyder et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136753 Bovenschulte et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150281 Hoff Jun 2007 A1
20070150916 Begole et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070209047 Hallberg et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214471 Rosenberg Sep 2007 A1
20070225585 Washbon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225674 Molnar et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226760 Neuhauser et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070235716 Delic et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238945 Delic et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244977 Atkins Oct 2007 A1
20070250846 Swix et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250901 McIntire et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265507 de Lemos Nov 2007 A1
20070282566 Whitlow et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294132 Zhang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294705 Gopalakrishnan Dec 2007 A1
20070294706 Neuhauser et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001600 deCharms Jan 2008 A1
20080004940 Rolleston Phillips Jan 2008 A1
20080010110 Neuhauser et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080024725 Todd Jan 2008 A1
20080027345 Kumada et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040740 Plotnick et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080043013 Gruttadauria et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059997 Plotnick et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065468 Berg et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065721 Cragun Mar 2008 A1
20080081961 Westbrook et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080082019 Ludving et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086356 Glassman et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091463 Shakamuri Apr 2008 A1
20080091512 Marci et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097854 Young Apr 2008 A1
20080109840 Walter et al. May 2008 A1
20080125110 Ritter May 2008 A1
20080133724 Clark Jun 2008 A1
20080147448 Tunick et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147742 Allen Jun 2008 A1
20080152300 Knee et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162182 Cazares et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177197 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195471 Dube Aug 2008 A1
20080204273 Crystal et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208072 Fadem et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214902 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080218472 Breen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221400 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221472 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221969 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222670 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222671 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228077 Wilk et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249865 Angell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255949 Genco et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263458 Altberg et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080295126 Lee et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080306398 Uchiyama et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090018996 Hunt et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024049 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024447 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024448 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024449 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024475 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024747 Moses et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090025023 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090025024 Beser et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030287 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030303 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030717 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030762 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030780 York et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030930 Pradeep et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036755 Pradeep et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036756 Pradeep et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037575 Crystal et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090060240 Coughlan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090062629 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090062679 Tan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090062680 Sandford Mar 2009 A1
20090062681 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063255 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063256 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069652 Lee et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070798 Lee et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082643 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082689 Guttag et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082692 Hale et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083129 Pradeep et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088610 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090089830 Chandratillake et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094286 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094627 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094628 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094629 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090097689 Prest et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098524 Walton Apr 2009 A1
20090099873 Kurple Apr 2009 A1
20090112077 Nguyen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112117 Rewari Apr 2009 A1
20090119154 Jung et al. May 2009 A1
20090131764 Lee et al. May 2009 A1
20090132441 Muller et al. May 2009 A1
20090133047 Lee et al. May 2009 A1
20090138356 Pomplun May 2009 A1
20090144780 Toebes et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150919 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150920 Jones Jun 2009 A1
20090153328 Otani et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090156907 Jung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090156955 Jung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158308 Weitzenfeld et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163777 Jung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164132 Jung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171164 Jung et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187467 Fang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090195392 Zalewski Aug 2009 A1
20090214060 Chuang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216611 Leonard et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090221928 Einav et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248484 Surendran et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248496 Hueter et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248594 Castleman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249223 Barsook et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090253996 Lee et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259137 Delic et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259509 Landvater Oct 2009 A1
20090271294 Hadi Oct 2009 A1
20090287108 Levy Nov 2009 A1
20090292587 Fitzgerald Nov 2009 A1
20090300672 Van Gulik Dec 2009 A1
20090305006 Steffen Dec 2009 A1
20090318773 Jung et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090318826 Green et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327068 Pradeep et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328089 Pradeep et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328122 Amento et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004977 Marci et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022821 Dubi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030578 Siddique et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100041962 Causevic et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042012 Alhussiny Feb 2010 A1
20100060300 Muller et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063881 Ghosh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094702 Silberstein Apr 2010 A1
20100121716 Golan May 2010 A1
20100125219 Harris et al. May 2010 A1
20100145176 Himes Jun 2010 A1
20100145215 Pradeep et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145217 Otto et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153175 Pearson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100169153 Hwacinski et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169162 Anderson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179881 Wiederstein Jul 2010 A1
20100180029 Fourman Jul 2010 A1
20100183279 Pradeep et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100186031 Pradeep et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100186032 Pradeep et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198042 Popescu et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211439 Marci et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214318 Pradeep et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100215289 Pradeep et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100218208 Holden Aug 2010 A1
20100223094 Cumming et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228604 Desai et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228614 Zhang et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234752 Sullivan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241580 Schleier-Smith Sep 2010 A1
20100249538 Pradeep et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249636 Pradeep et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250325 Pradeep et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250347 Rainer et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250458 Ho Sep 2010 A1
20100257052 Zito et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100263005 White Oct 2010 A1
20100268540 Arshi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268573 Jain et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268720 Spivack et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100269127 Krug Oct 2010 A1
20100274152 McPeck et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287152 Hauser Nov 2010 A1
20100292998 Bodlaender et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306030 Mawani Dec 2010 A1
20100306120 Ciptawilangga Dec 2010 A1
20100317988 Terada et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318507 Grant et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325660 Holden Dec 2010 A1
20100331661 Nakagawa Dec 2010 A1
20100332319 Etchegoyen Dec 2010 A1
20100332331 Etchegoyen Dec 2010 A1
20110004089 Chou Jan 2011 A1
20110015503 Joffe et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110020778 Forbes Jan 2011 A1
20110022459 Milanese et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022965 Lawerence et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110040155 Guzak et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040202 Luo et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110043759 Bushinsky Feb 2011 A1
20110046473 Pradeep et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110046502 Pradeep et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110046504 Pradeep et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047035 Gidwani et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047121 Pradeep et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110059422 Masaoka Mar 2011 A1
20110085700 Lee Apr 2011 A1
20110105937 Pradeep et al. May 2011 A1
20110106621 Pradeep et al. May 2011 A1
20110106750 Pradeep et al. May 2011 A1
20110119124 Pradeep et al. May 2011 A1
20110119129 Pradeep et al. May 2011 A1
20110119130 Agan et al. May 2011 A1
20110153390 Harris Jun 2011 A1
20110208515 Neuhauser Aug 2011 A1
20110237971 Pradeep et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110248729 Mueller et al. Oct 2011 A2
20110270620 Pradeep et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276504 Pradeep et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282231 Pradeep et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282232 Pradeep et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282749 Pradeep et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110319975 Ho et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120002848 Hill Jan 2012 A1
20120036004 Pradeep et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120036005 Pradeep et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120046993 Hill Feb 2012 A1
20120054018 Pradeep et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072289 Pradeep et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120108995 Pradeep et al. May 2012 A1
20120114305 Holden May 2012 A1
20120130800 Pradeep et al. May 2012 A1
20120239407 Jain et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245978 Crystal et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130022948 Angell et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024272 Pradeep et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130046577 Marci et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130094722 Hill Apr 2013 A1
20130097715 Fourman Apr 2013 A1
20130124365 Pradeep May 2013 A1
20130124623 Munter May 2013 A1
20130152506 Pradeep Jun 2013 A1
20130166373 Pradeep et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185140 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185141 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185142 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185144 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185145 Pradeep et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130268279 Srinivasan et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130304540 Pradeep et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130332259 Pradeep et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140162225 Hill Jun 2014 A1
20140244345 Sollis et al. Aug 2014 A1
20180341977 Knight et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190005532 Pradeep et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190034958 Pradeep et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190034959 Pradeep et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190139078 Pradeep et al. May 2019 A1
20190156352 Pradeep et al. May 2019 A1
20190220888 Knight et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190282153 Pradeep et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200005339 Pradeep et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200163571 Pradeep et al. May 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
1087618 Mar 2001 EP
1609418 Dec 2005 EP
1374658 Nov 1974 GB
2221759 Feb 1990 GB
2001147944 May 2001 JP
2005-160805 Dec 2003 JP
2005051654 Feb 2005 JP
2006006355 Jan 2006 JP
2006-305334 Mar 2006 JP
2006227994 Aug 2006 JP
2007310454 Nov 2007 JP
200422399 Jul 2006 KR
95-018565 Jul 1995 WO
1997017774 May 1997 WO
1997040745 Nov 1997 WO
1997041673 Nov 1997 WO
02-100241 Dec 2002 WO
02-102238 Dec 2002 WO
2004049225 Jun 2004 WO
2006-009771 Jan 2006 WO
WO2008030831 Mar 2008 WO
WO2008055078 May 2008 WO
2008-064431 Jun 2008 WO
2008072739 Jun 2008 WO
2008-077178 Jul 2008 WO
2008-109694 Sep 2008 WO
2008-109699 Sep 2008 WO
2008121651 Oct 2008 WO
2008137579 Nov 2008 WO
2008-137581 Nov 2008 WO
2008-141340 Nov 2008 WO
2008154410 Dec 2008 WO
2009018374 Feb 2009 WO
2009052833 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (598)
Entry
Zyga, Lisa, “A Baseball Cap That Can Read Your Mind,” PhysOrg.com, located at www.physorg.com/news130152277.html, May 16, 2008, pp. 1-11.
Gargiulo, Gaetano, et al., “A Mobile EEG System With Dry Electrodes,” Nov. 2008, pp. 1-4.
Taheri, Babk A., et al., “A Dry Electrode for EEG Recording,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 1994, pp. 376-383.
Barcelo, Francisco, et al., “Prefrontal Modulation of Visual Processing in Humans,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, No. 4, Apr. 2000, pp. 399-403.
Canolty, R.T., et al., “High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex,” Science, vol. 313, Sep. 15, 2006, pp. 1626-1628.
Engel, Andreas, et al., “Dynamic Predictions: Oscillations and Synchrony in Top-Down Processing,” Macmillan Magazines Ltd, vol. 2, Oct. 2001, pp. 704-716.
Fries, Pascal, “A Mechanism for Cognitive Dynamics: Neuronal Communication Through Neuronal Coherence,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, No. 10, Oct. 2005, p. 474-480.
Gazzaley, Adam, et al., “Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 507-517.
Hartikainen, Kaisa, et al., “Emotionally Arousing Stimuli Compete with Attention to Left Hemispace,” Editorial Manager(tm) for NeuroReport, Manuscipt Draft, Manuscript No. NR-D-07-5935R1, submitted Sep. 8, 2007, 26 pages.
Knight, Robert T., “Contribution of Human Hippocampal Region to Novelty Detection,” Nature, vol. 383, Sep. 19, 1996, p. 256-259.
Knight Robert T., “Decreased Response to Novel Stimuli After Prefrontal Lesions in Man,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 59, 1984, pp. 9-20.
Miltner, Wolfgang H.R., et al., “Coherence of Gamma-band EEG Activity as a Basis for Associative Learning,” Nature, vol. 397, Feb. 4, 1999, pp. 434-436.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,302, dated May 7, 2012, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated May 8, 2012, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,696, dated May 15, 2012, 16 pages.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,455, dated Jun. 13, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,225, dated Jun. 15, 2012, 9 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,934, dated Jun. 18, 2012, 11 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, dated Jun. 21, 2012, 9 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Jul. 10, 2012, 13 pages.
Second Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880019166.0, dated Jun. 5, 2012, 8 pages.
Second Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880104982.1, dated Jun. 29, 2012, 5 pages.
Barreto et al., “Physiologic Instrumentation for Real-time Monitoring of Affective State of Computer Users,” WSEAS International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Control, Circuits and Systems (IMCCAS), (2004), 6 pages.
Jung et al., “Analysis and Visualization of Single-Trial Event-Related Potentials,” Human Brain Mapping vol. 14, 166-185 (2001), 20 pages.
Krugman, “Brain Wave Measures of Media Involvement,” Journal of Advertising Research vol. 11, 3-9 (Feb. 1971), 7 pages.
The Mathworks, Inc., “MATLAB Data Analysis: Version 7,” p. 4-19 (2005), 3 pages.
Klimesch, “EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performanceJul. 20, 2012 a review and analysis,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 29, 169-195, (1999), 27 pages.
Krakow et al., “Methodology: EEG-correlated fMRI,” Functional Imaging in the Epilepsies, (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000), 17 pages.
Allen et al., “A Method of Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI,” Neuroimage, vol. 12, 230-239, (Aug. 2000).
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Oct. 13, 2011, 22 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Oct. 19, 2011, 21 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,315, dated Oct. 26, 2011, 41 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,240, dated Oct. 27, 2011, 39 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,221, dated Nov. 28, 2011, 44 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Dec. 7, 2011, 8 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 16 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 15 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Dec. 22, 2011, 18 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Dec. 29, 2011, 18 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Jan. 3, 2012, 10 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Jan. 4, 2012, 10 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,921, dated Jan. 9, 2012, 13 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,302, dated Jan. 17, 2012, 11 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,225, dated Jan. 20, 2012, 12 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, dated Jan. 24, 2012, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 11006934.1-2221, dated Oct. 25, 2011, 5 pages.
First Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880104982.1, dated Nov. 30, 2011, 16 pages.
Meriam-Webster Online Dictionary definition for “tangible,” available at http://www.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible, 1 page.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,958, dated Feb. 10, 2012, 6 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,069, dated Feb. 14, 2012, 35 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,322, dated Feb. 14, 2012, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Feb. 16, 2012, 15 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Feb. 17, 2012, 22 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Application No. 12/122,253, on Feb. 17, 2012, 20 pp.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Feb. 17, 2012, 15 pages.
Mosby's Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, & Health Professions, 2009, Mosby, Inc., Definition of Alpha Wave, 1 page.
Mosby's Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, & Health Professions, 2009, Mosby, Inc., Definition of Beta Wave, 1 page.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,512, filed Sep. 30, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,525, filed Sep. 30, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,504, filed Nov. 3, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,571, filed Nov. 3, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/304,234, filed Nov. 3, 2011, (unpublished).
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated Mar. 1, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,851, dated Mar. 12, 2012, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/846,242, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 15 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Apr. 6, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,315, dated Apr. 9, 2012, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,958, dated May 2, 2012, 14 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israel Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203176, dated Feb. 21, 2012, 2 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israel Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203177, dated Mar. 1, 2012, 2 pages.
Second Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880101500.7, dated Apr. 5, 2012, 5 pages.
Padgett et al., “Categorical Perception in Facial Emotion Classification,” In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 249-253 (1996), 5 pages.
De Gelder et al., “Categorical Perception of Facial Expressions: Categories and their Internal Structure,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 11(1), pp. 1-23 (1997), 23 pages.
Bimler et al., “Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 15(5), pp. 633-658 (Sep. 2001), 26 pages.
Newell et al., “Categorical perception of familiar objects,” Cognition, vol. 85, Issue 2, pp. 113-143. (Sep. 2002), 31 pages.
Meriam Webster Online Dictionary, Definition of Virtual Reality, available at http://www.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/virtual%20reality, 2 page.
Griss et al., “Characterization of micromachined spiked biopotential electrodes,” Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions (Jun. 2002), 8 pages.
“User monitoring,” Sapien Systems, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20030818043339/http:/www.sapiensystems.com/eyetracking.html, (Aug. 18, 2003), 1 page.
Sullivan et al., “A brain-machine interface using dry-contact, low-noise EEG sensors,” In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (May 18, 2008), 4 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated May 23, 2012, 11 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Aug. 28, 2012, 3 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Jun. 8, 2012, 12 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Aug. 3, 2012, 8 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/545.455, dated Aug. 29, 2012, 11 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Jul. 30, 2012, 15 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,810, dated Aug. 31, 2012, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,828, dated Aug. 30, 2012, 9 pages.
Second Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of China in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200880017883.X, dated Aug. 10, 2012 (9 pages).
Oberman et al., “EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots,” Elsevier, Neurocomputing vol. 70 (2007), Jan. 2, 2007 (10 pages).
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Oct. 30, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Nov. 2, 2012, 5 pages.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,225, dated Nov. 2, 2012, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, dated Nov. 13, 2012, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Nov. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated Nov. 23, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,102, dated Dec. 7, 2012, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,958, dated Dec. 10, 2012, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,197, dated Dec. 20, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 19 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,213, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 10 page.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated Dec. 26, 2012, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Dec. 31, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Dec. 31, 2012, 10 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Jan. 4, 2013, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Jan. 11, 2013, 11 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,225, dated Jan. 11, 2013, 11 pages.
Recertified IDS and Interview Summary, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,197, dated Jan. 16, 2013, 6 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israeli Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 201187, dated Nov. 27, 2012, 2 pages.
English Translation of Third Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880101500.7, dated Nov. 21 2012, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08796890.5-2319/2170161, dated Dec. 7, 2012, 9 pages.
Palva et al., “Phase Synchrony Among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005), 3962-3972, 11 pages.
Lachaux et al., “Measuring Phase Synchrony in Brain Signals,” Human Brain Mapping 8 (1999), 194-208, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Sep. 17, 2012, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated Sep. 17, 2012, 11 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253, dated Sep. 17, 2012, 17 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Sep. 18, 2012, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Sep. 19, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Sep. 19, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Sep. 20, 2012, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,213, dated Sep. 7, 2012, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Sep. 26, 2012, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 14 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israel Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203176, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 1 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israel Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203177, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 1 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Oct. 1, 2012, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/444,149, dated Oct. 4, 2012, 9 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,851, dated Oct. 4, 2012, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Oct. 5, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-501190, dated Oct. 5, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,197, dated Oct. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated Oct. 22, 2012, 5 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-506646, on Oct. 23, 2012, 3 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/846,242, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 14 pages.
Clemons, “Resonance Marketing in the Age of the Truly Informed Consumer: Creating Profits through Differentiation and Delight,” Wharton Information Strategy & Economics Blog 2, available at http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/˜clemons/blogs/resonanceblog.pdf, (Mar. 28, 2007), 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/85,3197, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Jan. 31, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Jan. 31,2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Jan. 31,2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Feb. 1, 2013, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Feb. 1, 2013, 5pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Feb. 4, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,213, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Feb. 14, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Feb. 15, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Apr. 16, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Apr. 22, 2013, 11 pages.
Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880104982.1, dated Jan. 14, 2013, 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08770372.4-1265/2152155, dated Feb. 6, 2013, 7 pages.
English Translation of Third Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880017883.X, dated Mar. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880101500.7, dated Apr. 3, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/444,149, dated May 2, 2013, 27 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated May 8, 2013, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated May 8, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated May 8, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated May 8, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/569,711, dated May 14, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated May 17, 2013, 6 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,828, dated May 23, 2013, 25 pages.
Office Communication to Applicant, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated May 24, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated May 28, 2013, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated May 31, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. APPLICATION No. 12/056,211, dated Jun. 3, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Jun. 3, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Jun. 11, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,455, dated Jun. 11, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 5 pages.
Office Communication to Applicant, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Jun. 21, 2013, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,774, dated Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israeli Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203176, dated Apr. 23, 2013, 1 page.
English Translation of Notice Prior to Allowance, issued by the Israeli Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 203176, dated Jun. 30, 2013, 1 page.
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Definition for “Resonance,” available at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resonance, 4 pages.
Enghoff, Sigurd, Thesis: “Moving ICA and Time-Frequency Analysis in Event-Related EEG Studies of Selective Attention,” Technical University of Denmark, (Dec. 1999), 54 pages.
Zhang, P., “Will You Use Animation on Your Web Pages?” Doing Business on the Internet: Opportunities and Pitfalls, C. Romm and F. Sudweeks (eds.), Spring-Verlag (1999), 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Jul. 29, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Sep. 13, 2013, 7 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Sep. 17, 2013, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,828, dated Oct. 8, 2013, 11 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-523112, dated Jul. 30, 2013, 2 pages.
Decision to Grant Patent, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-506646, dated Aug. 6, 2013, 4 pages.
English Translation of Decision on Rejection, issued by the Chinese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 200880017883.X, dated Aug. 5, 2013, 13 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 6 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated Jan. 31, 2014, 5 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Feb. 3, 2014, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/444,149, dated Feb. 3, 2014, 5 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Feb. 4, 2014, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, dated Feb. 10, 2014, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 112/884,034, dated Feb. 10, 2014, 18 pages.
Axis Communications, “Improve your merchandising effectiveness. Get the full picture with network video” (2008), available at :http ://www.axis.com/files/user_scenarios/ap_ret_merchandising_31107_en_0803_1o.pdf, 2 pages.
Brown, M. “Should My Advertising Stimulate an Emotional Response?” (2009) available at http://www.wpp.com/˜/media/sharedwpp/readingroom/marketing/millward_brown_emotional_response.pdf, 6 pages.
Mehta, A. et al., “Reconsidering Recall and Emotion in Advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research, (Mar. 2006), 49-56, 8 pages.
Cheung, Kwok-Wai, et al., “Mining Customer Product Ratings for Personalized Marketing,” Decision Support Systems 35 (2003) 231-243, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated May 27, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, dated May 29, 2014, 8 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Jun. 2, 2014, 13 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 25 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Jul. 1, 2014, 16 pages.
Decision to Grant Patent, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-523112, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 4 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israel Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 201187, dated Apr. 23, 2014, 2 pages.
Darrow, Chester, “Psychological and psychophysiological significance of the electroencephalogram,” Psychological Review (May 1947) 157-168, 12 pages.
Stamm, John, “On the Relationship between Reaction Time to Light and Latency of Blocking the Alpha Rhythm,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Feb. 1952), 61-68, 8 pages.
Mizuki, Yashushi, et al., “Periodic Appearance of the Theta Rhythm in the Frontal Midline Area During Performance of a Mental Task,:” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Aug. 1980), 345-351, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,698, dated Oct. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
English Translation of Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued by the Korean Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 10-2010-7001406, dated Oct. 21, 2014, 1 page.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, dated Jul. 23, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Aug. 6, 2014, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, dated Aug. 13, 2014, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated Aug. 14, 2014, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, dated Aug. 15, 2014, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Aug. 21, 2014, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,774, dated Sep. 18, 2014, 15 pages.
Decision to Grant Patent, issued by the Korean Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 10-2009-7022551, dated Aug. 13, 2014, 3 pages.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W., Measuring Facial Movement, Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1 (1) (Fall 1976), pp. 56-75, 20 pages.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for Measurement of Facial Movement, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif. (1978).
Ekman, P., Friesen, W., Unmasking the Face—A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1979).
Ekman, P., Friesen, W., Ancoli, S., Facial Signs of Emotional Experience, J. Personality & Social Psychology, 39(6) (Dec. 1980), pp. 1125-1134, 10 pages.
Izard, C. E., The Maximally Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System, (Rev. ed.), Instructional Resources Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Del. (1983).
Izard, C., Dougherty, L., Hembree, E., A System for Identifying Affect Expressions by Holistic Judgments (AFFEX), Instructional Resources Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Del. (1983).
Jia, X., Nixon, M.S., Extending the Feature Set for Automatic Face Recognition, International Conference on Image Processing and Its Applications (Apr. 7-9, 1992), 6 pages.
Lisetti, C., Nasoz, F., Using Noninvasive Wearable Computers to Recognize Human Emotions from Physiological Signals, EURASIP J. Applied Signal Processing, 11 (Sep. 2004), pp. 1672-1687, 16 pages.
Jaimes, A., Sebe, N., Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction: A Survey, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 108 (Oct.-Nov. 2007), pp. 116-134, 19 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 18 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Mar. 6, 2015, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,344, dated Apr. 9, 2015, 12 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,344, dated Nov. 20, 2015, 28 pages.
Translation of Reexamination Decision, issued by the Chinese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 200880017883.X, dated Nov. 13, 2015, 1 page.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Dec. 17, 2015, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,698, dated Jan. 14, 2016, 35 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Jan. 22, 2016, 38 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Feb. 3, 2016, 23 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, dated Feb. 18, 2016, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Feb. 23, 2016, 24 pages.
English Translation of Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued by the Korean Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 10-2010-7001406, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 1 page.
English Translation of Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880017883.X, dated Feb. 3, 2016, 2 pages.
Landau et al., “Different Effects of Voluntary and Involunatry Attention on EEG Activity in the Gamma Band,” J of Neuroscience 27(44), Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 11986-11990, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Jun. 17, 2016, 20 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,660, dated Jul. 29, 2016, 67 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated Jul. 27, 2016, 20 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Aug. 8, 2016, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Aug. 16, 2016, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 61 pages.
English Translation of Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued by the Korean Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 10-2010-7001406, dated Jul. 27, 2016, 4 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,357, dated Nov. 1, 2016, 22 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Nov. 7, 2016, 3 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Nov. 14, 2016, 18 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Nov. 14, 2016, 10 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 27 pages.
First Examination Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08796890.5, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 4 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,344, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 52 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Jan. 31, 2017, 25 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 7 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Mar. 2, 2017, 14 pages.
English Translation of Notice Prior to Allowance, issued by the Israeli Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 201187, dated Feb. 14, 2017, 1 page.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 37 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 45 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated May 25, 2017, 2017, 9 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3), issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08744383.4-1958, on Apr. 19, 2017, 6 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 14 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253, dated Aug. 4, 2015, 30 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,698, dated Aug. 19, 2015, 12 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, dated Sep. 2, 2015, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Sep. 10, 2015, 15 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Sep. 16, 2015, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Sep. 30, 2015, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Sep. 30, 2015, 7 pages.
Opitz, S. “Neuromarketing: An Introduction” PowerPoint Presentation (2008), available at http://www.powershow.com/view/94a7b-YzlmN/Neuromarketing_powerpoint_ppt_presentation (last accessed Oct. 14, 2015), 20 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 27 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated Mar. 30, 2016, 23 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Apr. 6, 2016, 3 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, dated Apr. 21, 2016, 33 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated May 12, 2016, 61 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated May 20, 2016, 69 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,357, dated May 20, 2016, 22 pages.
M. Corbetta et al., “Control of Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Attention in the Brain,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 201-215 (Mar. 2002), 15 pages.
Becker, “A Study of Web Usability for Older Adults Seeking Online Health Resources,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 387-406 (Dec. 2004), 20 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Mar. 30, 2015, 6 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 5 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 16 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297 , on Nov. 27, 2015, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,344, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 38 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,357, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 17 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, on Jul. 13, 2017, 12 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Aug. 14, 2017, 38 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Aug. 18, 2017, 2017, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/546,586, dated Sep. 15, 2017, 43 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Sep. 26, 2017, 51 pages.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Patent Application No. 08796890.5, on Jul. 3, 2017, 3 pages.
English Translation of First Examination Report, issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 6145/CHENP/2009, on Aug. 16, 2017, 6 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-501190, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08747389.8-1952, dated Sep. 25, 2015, 6 pages.
Kamba et al., “The Krakatoa Chronicle—An Interactive, Personalized, Newspaper on the Web,” available at: http://www.w3.org/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/93/ (last accessed Nov. 2, 2015), 15 pages.
Ehrenberg et al., “Understanding Brand Performance Measures: Using Dirichlet Benchmarks,” 2004, Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, pp. 1307-1325, 19 pages.
Leeflang et al., “Building Models for Marketing Decisions,” 2000, Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 192-235, 482-521, 86 pages.
Bhattacharya, “Is your brand's loyalty too much, too little, or just right?: Explaining deviations in loyalty from the Dirichlet norm,” 1997, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 14, pp. 421-435, 15 pages.
Cohen, “Differentiated product demand analysis with a structured covariance probit: A Bayesian econometric approach,” 2009, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, pp. 1-184, 197 pages.
Nikolaeva et al., “The Moderating Role of Consumer and Product Characteristics on the Value of Customized On-Line Recommendations,” 2006, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 101-123, 24 pages.
Ehrenberg, “New Brands and the Existing Market,” 1991, International Journal of Market Research, vol. 33, No. 4, 10 pages.
Foxall, “The Substitutability of Brands,” 1999, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 20, pp. 241-257, 17 pages.
Pammer et al., “Forecasting the Penetration of a New Product—A Bayesian Approach,” 2000, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 428-435, 8 pages.
Rungie et al., “Calculation of Theoretical Brand Performance Measures from the Parameters of the Dirichlet Model,” 2004, Marketing Bulletin, Massey University, 15, Technical Note 2, pp. 1-19, 20 pages.
Uncles et al., “Patterns of Buyer Behavior: Regularities, Models, and Extensions,” 1995, Marketing Science, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. G71-G78, 9 pages.
Boltz, “The cognitive processing of film and musical soundtracks,” Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 2004, 32 (7), 1194-1205, 12 pages.
Christie et al., “Autonomic specificity of discrete emotion and dimensions of affective space: a multivariate approach,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51 (2004) 143-153, 11 pages.
Coombes et al., “Emotion and movement: Activation of defensive circuitry alters the magnitude of a sustained muscle contraction,” University of Florida, USA, Neuroscience Letters 396 (2006) 192-196, 5 pages.
Cryer et al. “Pull the Plug on Stress,” Harvard Business Review, Jul. 2003, 8 pages.
Demaree et al., “Predicting facial valence to negative stimuli from resting RSA: Not a function of active emotion regulation,” Cognition and Emotion vol. 20, Issue 2, 2006, pp. 161-176, published on Sep. 9, 2010, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699930500260427, 6 pages. (Abstract provided).
Elkman et al., “Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes among Emotions,” Science, New Series, vol. 221, No. 4616. (Sep. 16, 1983), pp. 1208-1210, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819830916%293%3A221%3A4616%3C1208%3AANSADA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H, 5 pages.
Elton, “Measuring emotion at the symphony,” The Boston Globe, Apr. 5, 2006, http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/labs/levitin/media/measuring emotion boston.html, 3 pages.
Goldberg, “Getting wired could help predict emotions,” The Boston Globe, Jun. 13, 2005, http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/mental/articles/2005/06/13/getting_wired_could_help_predict_emotions/?page=full, 4 pages.
Gomez et al., “Respiratory Responses Associated with Affective Processing of Film Stimuli,” Biological Psychology, vol. 68, Issue 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 223-235, 2 pages. (Abstract provided).
Hall, “Is cognitive processing the right dimension,” World Advertising Research Center, Jan. 2003, 3 pages.
Hall, “On Measuring the Power of Communications,” Journal of Advertising Research, 44, pp. 1-11, doi:10.1017/S0021849904040139, (2004), 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Hall, “Research and strategy: a fall from grace,” ADMAP, Issue 443, pp. 18-20, 2003, 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Hubert et al., “Autonomic, neuroendocrine, and subjective responses to emotion-inducing film stimuli,” Int J Psychophysiol,Aug. 1991, 2 pages. (Abstract provided).
Levenson et al., “Emotion and Autonomic Nervous System Activity in the Minangkabau of West Sumatra,” Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 2 pages. (Abstract provided).
Marci et al., “The effect of emotional distance on psychophysiologic concordance and perceived empathy between patient and interviewer,” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Jun. 2006, vol. 31, issue 2, 31:115-129, 8 pages. (Abstract provided).
Mccraty et al., “Analysis of twenty-four hour heart rate variability in patients with panic disorder,” Biological Psychology, vol. 56, Issue 2, Jun. 2001, pp. 131-150, 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Mccraty et al., “Electrophysiological Evidence of Intuition: Part 1. The Surprising Role of the Heart,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, pp. 133-143, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 12 pages.
Mccraty et al., “Electrophysiological Evidence of Intuition: Part 2. A System-Wide Process?,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 10, No. 2, 2004, pp. 325-336, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 12 pages.
Mccraty et al., “The Effects of Different Types of Music on Mood, Tension, and Mental Clarity,” Original Research, Alternative Therapies, Jan. 1998, vol. 4., No. 1, pp. 75-84, 10 pages.
Mccraty et al., “The Effects of Emotions on Short-Term Power Spectrum Analysis of Heart Rate Variability,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 76, No. 14, Nov. 15, 1995, pp. 1089-1093, 6 pages.
Mccraty et al., “The Impact of a New Emotional Self-Management Program on Stress, Emotions, Heart Rate Variability, DHEA and Cortisol,” Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, Apr.-Jun. 1998, vol. 33, No. 2, 151-170, 20 pages.
Mccraty et al., “The Impact of an Emotional Self -Management Skills Course on Psychosocial Functioning and Autonomic Recovery to Stress in Middle School Children,” Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, Oct.-Dec. 1999, vol. 34, No. 4, 246-268, 23 pages.
Melillo, “Inside the Consumer Mind; What Neuroscience Can Tell Us About Marketing,” Adweek, Public Citizen's Commercial Alert, Jan. 16, 2006, http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising/inside-consumer-mind-83549, 8 pages.
Miller et al., “Influence of Specific Emotional States on Autonomic Reactivity and Pulmonary Function in Asthmatic Children,” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 36, Issue 5, May 1997, pp. 669-677, 3 pages. (Abstract provided).
Murphy et al., “The Heart Reinnervates After Transplantation,” Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Jun. 2000, vol. 69, Issue 6, pp. 1769-1781, 13 pages.
Rosenberg, “Emotional R.O.I.,” The Hub, May/Jun. 2006,pp. 24-25, 2 pages.
Tiller et al., “Cardiac Coherence: A New, Noninvasive Measure of Autonomic Nervous System Order,” Alternative Therapies, Jan. 1996, vol. 2, No. 1, 14 pages.
Umetani et al. “Twenty-Four Hour Time Domain Heart Rate Variability and Heart Rate: Relations to Age and Gender Over Nine Decades,” J Am Coll Cardiol, Mar. 1, 1998, pp. 593-601, 9 pages.
Von Leupoldt et al., “Emotions in a Body Plethysmograph,” Journal of Psychophysiology (2004), 18, pp. 170-176, 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Kallman, “Effect of Blank Time on Picture Recognition,” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 97, No. 3 (Autumn, 1984), pp. 399-406, 4 pages. (Abstract provided).
Larose, Data Mining Methods and Models, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Central Connecticut State University, www.dbeBooks.com—An Ebook Library,published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006, 340 pages. (Book).
Han et al., Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 2nd Edition, Elsevier, 2006, 772 pages. (Book).
Liu et al., Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, 532 pages, (Book).
Berry et al., Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support, Wiley Publishing. Inc., Jun. 1997, 464 pages. (Book).
Horovitz, “Watching Ads Is Real Science Research Companies Monitor Physiological Reactions to Commercials to Determine Their Effectiveness,” Los Angeles Times, Sep. 1, 1991, 3 pages.
Sung et al., “Wearable feedback systems for rehabilitation,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2005, 12 pages.
Jaffe, Casting for Big Ideas, Adweek Magazine Series, Book 8, 2003, 256 pages. (Book)
Hall,, “A New Model for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness,” J. Advertising Research, vol. 42(2) (Mar./Apr. 2002), 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Hall, “Advertising as a Factor of Production,” ADMAP, 2003, pp. 20-23, 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Ranii, “Adding Science to Gut Check,” The News & Observer, D3 (Apr. 6, 2005), 1 page. (Abstract provided).
Mccraty et al., “Impact of a Workplace Stress Reduction Program on Blood Pressure and Emotional Health in Hypertensive Employees”, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 9, No. 3, 2003, pp. 355-369, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 15 pages.
Knutson et al., “Neural Predictors of Purchases,” Neuron vol. 53 (Jan. 4, 2007), pp. 147-156, 10 pages.
Schaefer et al., “Neural Correlates of Culturally Familiar Brands of Car Manufacturers,” NeuroImage, vol. 31 (2006), pp. 861-865, 5 pages.
Aharon et al., “Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value: fMRI and Behavorial Evidence,” Neuron, vol. 32 (2001), pp. 537-551, 15 pages.
Hall, “A New Model for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, Mar.-Apr. 2002, 10 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, on Jan. 29, 2018, 11 pages.
English Translation of First Examination Report, issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 4438/KOLNP/2009, dated Sep. 25, 2017, 7 pages.
Ganel et al., “The Relationship Between fMRI Adapation and Repetition Priming,” NeuroImage, Jul. 18, 2006, pp. 1434-1440, 9 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, on Feb. 2, 2018, 10 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, on Mar. 1, 2018, 14 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,550, on Mar. 27, 2018, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/299,752, dated Apr. 17, 2018, 21 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,344, dated Oct. 2, 2017, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,357, dated Oct. 20, 2017, 16 pages.
Advisory Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 4 pages.
Examiner's Answer, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 2017, 68 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/299,752, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 131 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Nov. 15, 2017, 49 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, on Dec. 6, 2017, 14 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated May 3, 2018, 46 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated May 18, 2018, 31 pages.
Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08796890.5, dated Mar. 16, 2018, 43 pages.
English Translation of First Examination Report, issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 4441/KOLNP/2009, dated May 21, 2018, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,541, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 62 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 69 pages.
Decision on Request for Rehearing, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, on Aug. 10, 2018, 8 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,805, on Sep. 10, 2018, 11 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, on Sep. 19, 2018, 8 pages.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Patent Application No. 08744383.4, on Dec. 11, 2018, 6 pages.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, on Dec. 28, 2018, 8 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Jul. 8, 2011, 16 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,211, dated Jan. 7, 2011, 19 pages.
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,221, dated Apr. 15, 2011, 24 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Jun. 9, 2011, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,863, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 15 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Apr. 21, 2011, 10 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/113,870, dated Dec. 3, 2010, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,240, dated Jun. 10, 2011, 12 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated May 26, 2011, 15 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,262, dated Dec. 9, 2010, 13 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, dated Jan. 21, 2011, 16 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, dated Oct. 28, 2010, 14 pages.
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066, on May 31, 2011, 2 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Dec. 23, 2010, 14 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,074, dated Jun. 9, 2011, 10 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,874, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 17 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 14 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,557, dated Jun. 9, 2011, 12 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Jun. 21, 2011, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,583, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 17 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Jun. 14, 2011, 13 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 17 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Jul. 6, 2011, 13 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,813, dated Dec. 27, 2010, 14 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,372, dated Jun. 7, 2011, 10 pages.
Final Rejection, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,069, dated Feb. 17, 2011, 32 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,069, dated Oct. 29, 2010, 21 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,315, dated May 4, 2011, 9 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, dated Jun. 7, 2011, 9 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, dated Jul. 18, 2011, 9 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685,dated Jul. 12, 2011, 15 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,190,dated Aug. 10, 2011, 28 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,322,dated Aug. 23, 2011, 12 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,069,dated Aug. 26, 2011, 33 pages.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253,dated Sep. 2, 2011, 7 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, dated Sep. 12, 2011, 12 pages.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,851, dated Sep. 12, 2011, 7 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,066,dated Sep. 29, 2011, 37 pages.
Restriction Requirement, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,225, dated Oct. 3, 2011, 6 pages.
Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,388, dated Oct. 12, 2011, 27 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/058264, dated Sep. 29, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/058264, dated Aug. 1, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/058264, dated Aug. 1, 2008, 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062273, dated Nov. 3, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062273, dated Sep. 5, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062273, dated Sep. 5, 2008, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062275, dated Nov. 3, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062275, dated Sep. 22, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/062275, dated Sep. 22, 2008, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063984, dated Nov. 17, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063984, dated Sep. 29, 2008, 3 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063984, dated Sep. 29, 2008, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063989, dated Nov. 17, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063989, dated Jul. 17, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/063989, dated Jul. 17, 2008, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/066166, dated Dec. 7, 2009, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/066166, dated Aug. 25, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/066166, dated Aug. 25, 2008, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/071639, dated Feb. 2, 2010, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/071639, dated Oct. 22, 2008, 3 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/071639, dated Oct. 22, 2008, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/074467, dated Mar. 2, 2010, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/074467, dated Nov. 17, 2008, 2 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US08/074467, dated Nov. 17, 2008, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report of Patentability, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US10/021535, dated Jul. 26, 2011, 1 page.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US10/021535, dated Mar. 23, 2010, 3 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US10/021535, dated Mar. 23, 2010, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report of Patentability, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US09/065368, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 2 pages.
International Search Report, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US09/065368, dated Jan. 21, 2010, 3 pages.
Written Opinion, issued by the International Bureau in connection with International Application No. PCT/US09/065368, dated Jan. 21, 2010, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08744383.4-2221/2130146, dated Jul. 27, 2011, 6 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 10173095.0-2221, dated Dec. 17, 2010, 3 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 10189294.1-2221, dated Mar. 21, 2011, 7 pages.
First Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880104982.1, dated Jan. 25, 2011, 15 pages.
First Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 2008801015007, dated May 25, 2011, 8 pages.
First Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in connection with Patent Application No. 200880019166.0, dated Jul. 22, 2011, 16 pages.
Decsision of Rejection, issued bythe Statee Intellectual Property Office of China P.R. in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200880104982.1. dated Sep. 23, 2011, 10 pages.
Edgar, et al., “Digital Filters in Erp Research,” in Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook pp. 85-113, (Todd C. Handy, ed., 2005), 15 pages.
Simon-Thomas, et al, “Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence of a Right Hemisphere Bias for the Influence of Negative Emotion on Higher Cognition,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, pp. 518-529, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2005), 12 pages.
Friedman, et al., “Event-Related Potential (ERP) Studies of Memory Encoding and Retrieval: A Selective Review,” Microscopy Research and Technique 51:6-26, Wiley-Less, Inc. (2000), 23 pages.
Gaillard, “Problems and Paradigms in ERP Research,” Biological Psychology, Elsevier Science Publisher B.V. (1988), 10 pages.
Hopf, et al., “Neural Sources of Focused Attention in Visual Search,” Cerebral Cortex, 10:1233-1241, Oxford University Press, (Dec. 2000), 9 pages.
Swick, et al., “Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex to Recognition Memory: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence,” Neuropsychology, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 155-170, American Psychological Association, Inc. (1999), 16 pages.
Luck, et al., “The sped of visual attention in schizophrenia: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence,” Schizophrenia Research, pp. 174-195, Elsevier B.V. www.sciencedirect.com, (2006), 22 pages.
Makeig, et al., “Mining event-related brain dynamics,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, No. 5, (May 2004), www.sciencedirect.com, 7 pages.
Herrmann, et al., “Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, pp. 465-476, Elsevier Science Ltd., www.elsvevier.com/locate/neubiorev, (2001), 12 pages.
Knight, “Consciousness Unchained: Ethical Issues and the Vegetative and minimally Conscious State,” The American Journal of Bioethics, 8:9, 1-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265160802414524, (Sep. 1, 2008), 3 pages.
Kishiyama, et al., “Novelty Enhancements in Memory Are Dependent on Lateral Prefrontal Cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, pp. 8114-8118, Society for Neuroscience (Jun. 24, 2009), 5 pages.
Paller, et al., “Validating neural correlates of familiarity,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11, No. 6, www.sciencedirect.com, (May 2, 2007), 8 pages.
Picton, et al., “Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria,” Psychophysiology, pp. 127-152, Society for Psychophysiological Research, (2000), 26 pages.
Yamaguchi, et al., “Rapid-Prefrontal—Hippocampal Habituation to Novel Events,” The Journal of Neuroscience, pp. 5356-5363, Society for Neuroscience, (Apr. 29, 2004), 8 pages.
Rugg, et al., “Event-related potentials and recognition memory,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11, No. 6, www.sciencedirect.com, (May 3, 2007), 7 pages.
Rugg, et al., “The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues,” (Sep. 1996), 7 pages.
Kishiyama, et al., “Socioeconomic Disparities Affect Prefrontal Function in Children,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience pp. 1106-1115, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2008), 10 pages.
Spencer, “Averaging, Detection, and Classification of Single-Trial ERPs,” in Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook, pp. 209-227, (Todd C. Handy, ed., 2005), 10 pages.
Srinivasan, “High-Resolution EEG: Theory and Practice,” in Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook, pp. 167-188, (Todd C. Handy, ed., 2005), 12 pages.
Talsma, et al., “Methods for the Estimation and Removal of Artifacts and Overlap in ERP Waveforms,” in Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook, pp. 115-148, (Todd C. Handy, ed., 2005), 22 pages.
Davidson, et al., “The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 3, No. 1, (Jan. 1999), 11 pages.
Vogel, et al., “Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression During the Attentional Blink,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1656-1674, (1998), 19 pages.
Rizzolatti et al., “The Mirror-Neuron System,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 27, pp. 169-192, (Mar. 5, 2004), 30 pages.
Woldorf, “Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction,” Psychophysiology, Society for Psychophysiological Research, Cambridge University Press (1993), 22 pages.
Woodman, et al., “Serial Deployment of Attention During Visual Search,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 121-138, American Physiological Association (2003), 18 pages.
Filler, “MR Neurography and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Origins, History & Clinical Impact of the first 50,000 Cases With an Assortment of Efficacy and Utility in a Prospective 5,000 Patent Study Group,” Institute for Nerve Medicine, (Nov. 7, 2008), 56 pages.
Yuval-Greenberg, et al., “Transient Induced Gamma-Bands Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades,” Neuron, vol. 58, pp. 429-441, Elsevier Inc. (May 8, 2008), 13 pages.
Knight, et al., “Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks,” Acta Psychologica vol. 101, pp. 159-178, Elsevier (1999), 20 pages.
Buschman, et al., “Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and posterior Parietal Cortices,” Science, vol. 315, www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/315/5820/1860, American Association for the Advancement of Science, (2007), 4 pages.
Buschman, et al., “Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations,” Neuron, vol. 63, pp. 386-396, Elsevier, (Aug. 13, 2009), 11 pages.
Lui et al., “Marketing Strategies in Virtual Worlds,” The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 77-80, (Nov. 2007), 4 pages.
Cheng, et al. “Gender Differences I the Mu Rhythm of the Human Mirror-Neuron System,” PLos ONE, vol. 3, Issue 5, www.plosone.org, (May 2008), 7 pages.
D'Esposito, “From cognitive to neural models of working memory,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2086, (Mar. 30, 2007), 12 pages.
Dien, et al., “Application of Repeated Measures ANOVA to High-Dens Dataset: A Review and Tutorial,” in Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook pp. 57-82, (Todd C. Handy, ed., 2005), 14 pages.
Neurofocus—Neuroscientific Analysis for Audience Engagement, accessed on Jan. 8, 2010 at http://web.archive.org/web/20080621114525/www.neurofocus.com_/BrandImage.htm, (2008), 2 pages.
Ambler, “Salience and Choice: Neural Correlates of Shopping Decisions,” Psychology & Marketing, vol. 21, No. 4, p. 247-261, Wiley Periodicals, Inc., doi: 10.1002/mar20004, (Apr. 2004), 16 pages.
Hazlett, et al., “Emotional Response to Television Commercials: Facial EMG vs. Self-Report,” Journal of Advertising Research, (Apr. 1999), 17 pages.
Makeig, et al., “Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses,” Science, vol. 295, www.sciencemag.org, (Jan. 25, 2002), 5 pages.
Lewis et al., “Market Researchers make Increasing use of Brain Imaging,” ACNR, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 36-37, (Jul./Aug. 2005), 2 pages.
Sutherland, “Neuromarketing: What's it all about?” Retrieved from Max Sutherland's Weblog on Aug. 23, 2011, http://www.sutherlandsurvey.com/Column_pages/Neuromarketing_whats_it_all_about.htm, (Mar. 2007), 5 pages.
Haq, “This Is Your Brain on Advertising,” BusinessWeek, Market Research, (Oct. 8, 2007), 3 pages.
EEG Protocols, “Protocols for EEG Recording,” retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 23, 2011, http://www.q-metrx.com/EEGrecordingProtocols.pdf, (Nov. 13, 2007), 3 pages.
Aaker et al., “Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 365-381, (Mar. 1986), 17 pages.
Belch et al., “Psychophysiological and cognitive Response to Sex in Advertising,” Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 9, pp. 424-427, (1982), 6 pages.
Ruchkin et al., “Modality-specific processing streams in verbal working memory: evidence from spatio-temporal patterns of brain activity,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 6, pp. 95-113, Elsevier, (1997), 19 pages.
Page et al., “Cognitive Neuroscience, Marketing and Research,” Congress 2006—Foresight—The Predictive Power of Research Conference Papers, Esomar Publications, (Sep. 17, 2006), 25 pages.
Braeutigam, “Neuroeconomics-From neural systems to economic behavior,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 67, pp. 355-360, Elsevier, (2005), 6 pages.
Lee et al., “What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 63, pp. 199-204, Elsevier (2006), 6 pages.
Crawford et al., “Self-generated happy and sad emotions in low and highly hypnotizable persons during waking and hypnosis: laterality and regional EEG activity differences,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 24, pp. 239-266, (Dec. 1996), 28 pages.
Desmet, “Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products,” to be published in Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 111-123, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (Blythe et al., eds., 2004), 13 pages.
Bagozzi et al., “The Role of Emotions in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 184-206, Academy of Marketing Science (1999), 23 pages.
Blakeslee, “If You Have a ‘Buy Button’ in Your Brain, What Pushes It?” The New York Times, www.nytimes.com, (Oct. 19, 2004), 3 pages.
Kay et al., “Identifying natural images from human brain activity,” Nature, vol. 452, pp. 352-356, Nature Publishing Group, (Mar. 20, 2008), 5 pages.
Osborne, “Embedded Watermarking for image Verification in Telemedicine,” Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Adelaide (2005), 219 pages.
Nielsen, “Neuroinformatics in Functional Neuroimaging,” Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, (Aug. 30, 2002), 241 pages.
Arousal in Sport, in Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, vol. 1, p. 159, retrieved from Google Books, (Spielberger, ed., Elsevier Academic Press, 2004), 1 page.
Ziegenfuss, “Neuromarketing: Advertising Ethical & Medical Technology,” The Brownstone Journal, vol. XII, Boston University, pp. 69-73, (May 2005), 5 pages.
Lekakos, “Personalized Advertising Services Through Hybrid Recommendation Methods: The Case of Digital Interactive Television,” Department of Informatics, Cyprus University, (2004), 11 pages.
Yap et al., “TIMER: Tensor Image Morphing for Elastic Registration,” NeuroImage, vol. 47, (May 3, 2009), 15 pages.
Clifford, “Billboards That Look Back,” The New York Times, NYTimes.com, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/31/business/media/31billboard.html, (May 31, 2008), 4 pages.
Ambler et al., “Ads on the Brain: A Neuro-Imaging Comparison of Cognitive and Affecting Advertising Stimuli,” Centre for Marketing Working Paper, London Business School, No. 00-902, (Mar. 2000), 23 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,457, filed Mar. 10, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,810, filed May 12, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,828, filed May 12, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,821, filed May 10, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,840, filed May 10, 2011, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,197, filed Aug. 9, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, filed Sep. 16, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,531, filed Aug. 25, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,102, filed Oct. 27, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,213, filed Aug. 9, 2010, (unpublished).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,774, filed May 11, 2011, (unpublished).
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/037,666, dated Oct. 4, 2018, 37 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,525, dated Oct. 5, 2018, 31 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/037,666, dated Dec. 6, 2018, 96 pages.
Decision on Request for Rehearing, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,372, on Mar. 27, 2019, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,698, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 13 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,685, dated May 5, 2015, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,511, dated May 6, 2015, 5 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,774, dated May 14, 2015, 15 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated May 14, 2015, 22 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,564, dated May 22, 2015, 6 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,512, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 36 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Israeli Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 201187, dated Jun. 22, 2015, 4 pages.
Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued by the Korean Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 10-2010-7001406, dated Jun. 24, 2015 (with partial translation), 9 pages.
McClure, Samuel, et al., “Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks,” Neuron (Oct. 14, 2004), 379-387, 9 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,034, dated Oct. 23, 2013, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Nov. 6, 2013, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/444,149, dated Nov. 19, 2013, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,253, dated Dec. 3, 2013, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,596, dated Dec. 23, 2013, 7 pages.
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,774, dated Jan. 16, 2014, 11 pages.
English Translation of Office Action, issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Patent Application No. 2010-520159, dated Oct. 1, 2013, 2 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Application No. 08798799.6-1657/2180825, dated Nov. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Coan et al., “Voluntary Facial Expression and Hemispheric Asymmetry Over the Frontal Cortex,” Psycophysiology (Nov. 2001), 912-924, 14 pages.
Duchowski, “A Breadth-First Survey of Eye-tracking Applications,” Beahavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Nov. 2002), 455-470, 16 pages.
Heo et al., “Wait! Why is it Not Moving? Attractive and Distractive Ocular Responses to Web Ads,” Paper presented to AEJMC, (Aug. 2001) Washington, DC, available at http://www.psu.edu/dept/medialab/researchpage/newabstracts/wait.html, 3 pages.
Rothschild et al., “Predicting Memory for Components of TV Commercials from EEG,” Journal of Consumer Research (Mar. 1990), p. 472-478, 8 pages.
Beaver, John D., et al., “Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food”, J. of Neuroscience, (May 10, 2006), 5160-5166, 7 pages.
Tapert, Susan F., et al., “Neural Response to Alcohol Stimuli in Adolescents With Alcohol Use Disorder”, Arch Gen Psychiatry (Jul. 2003), 727-735, 9 pages.
Shandlen, Michael N. et al., “A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Neuronal and Behavioral Responses to Visual Motion”, The Journal of Neuroscience, (Feb. 15, 1996) 1486-1510, 25 pages.
Cassanello, Carlos R., et al., “Neuronal Responses to Moving Targets in Monkey Frontal Eye Fields”, J Neurophysiol (Sep. 2008), 1544-1556, 16 pages.
Intimation of Grant and Recordal of Patent, issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 4438/KOLNP/2009, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 1 page.
Intimation of Grant and Recordal of Patent, issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 4441/KOLNP/2009, dated Sep. 1, 2019, 1 page.
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,380, on Jul. 8, 2019, 12 .
Decision on Appeal, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/413,297, on Sep. 24, 2019, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,939, dated Oct. 4, 2019, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,987, dated Oct. 17, 2019, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/183,131, dated Nov. 18, 2019, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,939, dated Jan. 29, 2020, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/183,131, dated Mar. 24, 2020, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,044, dated Apr. 2, 2020, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,050, dated Apr. 6, 2020, 13 pages.
Hearing Notice issued by the Indian Patent Office in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 6145/CHENP/2009, on Mar. 12, 2020, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,930, dated Jul. 27, 2020, 12 pages (Copy not provided as this is a Uspto document. Applicant will provide document upon request from Examiner.).
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/421,864, dated Aug. 13, 2020, 24 pages (Copy not provided as this is a Uspto document. Applicant will provide document upon request from Examiner.).
Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,050, dated Oct. 7, 2020, 5 pages (Copy not provided as this is a Uspto document. Applicant will provide document upon request from Examiner.).
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,044, dated Oct. 9, 2020, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/790,160, dated Oct. 29, 2020, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,930, on Nov. 18, 2020, 8 pages.
Kim et al., “Design for an Interactive Television Advertising System,” Proceedings for the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2006), 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,050, dated Jan. 22, 2021, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/421,864, dated Jan. 25, 2021, 27 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/790,160, dated Februly 22, 2021, 79 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/692,511, dated Februry 24, 2021, 90 pages.
“One to One Interactive and Innerscope Research Release Preliminary Biomeasures Study Results,” PR Newswire, Feb. 28, 2007, 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110046503 A1 Feb 2011 US