The present invention relates to printing plate cleaning devices, and more specifically, to a dry flexographic printing plate cleaner system and method. Even more particularly, the invention relates to a system and method of cleaning the outer surface of a flexographic printing plate, while the printing plate is rotating on a plate cylinder, by using a web of dry cleaning material intermittently fed from a supply and urged against the outer surface of the printing plate by a linear actuator and associated dry pad assembly.
In order to improve on manual methods of cleaning printing plates, which involved bringing the rotating plate cylinders to a halt and wiping the printing plates by hand, automatic printing plate cleaners have been developed. Many automatic printing plate cleaners utilize a liquid solution to remove dust, fibers, particles, ink, or other foreign materials from a printing plate. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,918,545 to Pym discloses an apparatus for cleaning a flexographic printing plate by utilizing a brush roller to scrub the plate by rotating and oscillating against the plate. To increase the brush's effectiveness, a flicker bar is then utilized to intermittently engage the bristles of the brush in order to remove debris. One disadvantage of this design is that a rotating and oscillating brush can be effective to loosen foreign particles from the plate but is less effective at permanently removing the particles when compared to absorbent material such as a sponge or a cloth. Because utilizing a brush only disrupts ink residue remaining on the plate surface after the transfer of ink to the media, a significant portion of the ink is not captured and removed from the plate surface resulting in poor print quality. Another disadvantage of a brush is that it is more likely to abrade the surface of the flexographic printing plate which is made of polymeric material that is easily damaged and/or scratched. Pym also teaches a cleaning fluid applicator for supplying detergent and water to the brush roller and subsequently to the priming plate. Disadvantageously, cleaning fluid tends to remain on the plate and negatively affect print quality and also requires additional apparatus complexity and expense to allow for both the application and removal of the fluid. Accordingly, the Pym apparatus includes a drain tray configured to receive waste fluid and debris and remove both from the apparatus. Subsequently, a drying unit is positioned to provide a pressurized air stream across the length of the printing plate in order to remove excess fluid and dry the plate. Another disadvantage of the apparatus is that because the process, including the drying cycle, requires that the press be stopped, throughput of printed material is significantly reduced.
In order to provide a cleaning apparatus that does not require the use of a liquid and associated disadvantages, U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,015 to Gasparrini discloses a rotating brush cleaning system for removing debris, dust, lint, and ink from a printing cylinder. Although the process taught by Gasparrini is completely dry, disadvantageously, both a rotating spiral brush and a vacuum system are utilized. The spiral brush has the disadvantages of using a brush noted above and the vacuum system adds unnecessary cost and complexity to the cleaning system. Although Gasparrini generally teaches that the brush cleaner is periodically urged against the printing device, the brush cleaner and vacuum system can remain engaged while the press is operational thereby reducing press downtime.
Although U.S. Pat. No. 5,644,986 to Gydesen discloses a method and apparatus for cleaning flexographic printing cylinders that does not require brushes and can also be engaged while the press is operational, the method involves detaching dust, fibers, and other foreign objects by complex means of directing pressurized fluid of air, liquid, or solid matter particles on to the plate surface to loosen ink and foreign particles. The application of liquid has the disadvantages discussed above and applying solid matter particles increases the likelihood of damaging the printing plate. Although pressurized air is less likely to be abrasive, absent physical engagement with the plate surface, dry ink and other foreign particles are more likely to remain, thereby reducing print quality. Adding to the complexity of the design, a vacuum/suction and collection system is used to remove particles loosened from the plate surface by the pressurized air, liquid, or solid matter particles. This removal system has several disadvantages including the significant purchasing, operating, and maintenance costs required for the vacuum, blower and pump infrastructure. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the system is significantly reduced due to its reliance on uniform plate thickness. Because plates vary in thickness from one another and potentially across each specific surface, the precise setting of the apparatus at a specific distance from one plate surface will likely lead to diminished quality prints in successive printing plate changes.
To overcome many of the above disadvantages, a flexographic printing plate cleaner was disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,025 to Egan, incorporated herein by reference, which utilizes a sponge pad and cloth instead of a brush thereby effectively cleaning the printing plate through absorption means while significantly reducing the likelihood of harming the surface of the printing plate. Since the sponge pad in combination with the cloth allows for increased and relatively effective absorption, the need for a vacuum system is also eliminated. The cleaning apparatus also engages the printing plate while the press is in operation to significantly reduce press downtime. However, fluid is applied to the sponge pad as it is urged against the cloth and, subsequently, against the printing plate. Although the absorbent sponge pad and cloth significantly reduce fluid residue capable of effecting print quality, the application of any amount of liquid can increase the likelihood of fluid residue which is disadvantageous. Another disadvantage is the complexity and cost associated with the means necessary to provide fluid to the apparatus and inject the fluid to the sponge pad.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a simple and dry cleaner apparatus for effectively cleaning at least one flexographic printing plate that does not require abrasive brushing, the deposition of cleaning fluid, or a vacuum system, while still eliminating press downtime by engaging the printing plate while the press is in operation without diminishing print quality.
These and other features and advantages will be better understood by reading the following detailed description, taken together with the drawings wherein:
Referring to
One embodiment of a dry flexographic printing plate cleaner 2 is configured to traverse at least the length of a printing plate 6. Means for traversing the plate cleaner includes a motor and track system 12 configured to engage a frame 20 of the plate cleaner. The motor can be an electric stepper motor, a hydraulic motor, a pneumatic motor, a band drive motor, a belt drive motor, an electro-mechanical actuator, or any other type of linear actuator, for example, and is configured to move along a track such as a band, a chain or an endless toothed belt, for example, preferably substantially parallel to the axis of rotation of the plate cylinder 8. The plate cleaner 2 frame 20 has one end disposed towards the printing plate 6 and a pad assembly disposed toward the one end, the pad assembly 30 being described further below and shown in greater detail in
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring now to
Referring specifically to
Still referring to
In one embodiment, in order to perform operations on the components of the plate cleaner 2, the controller 50 stores and executes instructions as discussed above, in the form of a software and/or hardware program configured to operate as shown in
In one embodiment, as the plate cleaner 2 begins its cycle, the controller 50 operates the compressor 48 to extend the pad assembly 30 to the extended position thereby urging the dry pad 36 against the cleaning material 28 and the cleaning material 28 against the printing plate 6 surface. The controller 50 then uses the stored traverse speed value to operate the motor and track system 12 to traverse the plate cleaner 2. The controller 50 then uses the stored plate width value in combination with the stored traverse speed value to stop the plate cleaner 2 at the edge of the printing plate 6 or plate cylinder 8. The plate cleaner then operates the compressor 48 to retract the pad assembly 30. Next, the controller operates the spindle motor 44 to advance the dry cleaning material 28 to present the dry pad 36 with unused dry cleaning material 28 from the unwind spindle 24. As the spindle(s) 24, 26 rotate, a proximity sensor counts the number of rotating gear 30 teeth 42 and sends the information to the controller 50 which updates the cleaning material advance time which is used at the next cleaning material advance interval. As the unused dry cleaning material 28 is rolled up by operation of the spindle motor 44 in combination with the rewind spindle 26, the low cleaning material sensor 52 and associated pivot arm 53 sends a signal to the controller 50 when the dry cleaning material 28 needs replacement. If a signal is sent by the low cleaning material sensor 52, the controller automatically exits and powers off allowing the operator to replace the dry cleaning material 28. Assuming no signal is sent by the low cleaning material sensor 52 to the controller 50, the controller 50 operates the compressor 48 to extend the pad assembly 30 to the extended position, thereby continuing the cleaning cycle of the plate cleaner system.
While the principles of the invention have been described herein, it is to be understood by those skilled in the art that this description is made only by way of example and not as a limitation as to the scope of the invention. Other embodiments are contemplated within the scope of the present invention in addition to the exemplary embodiments shown and described herein. Modifications and substitutions by one of ordinary skill in the art are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, which is not to be limited except by the following claims.
This application is a division of application Ser. No. 12/482,793, filed Jun. 11, 2009, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4555989 | Marass et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4920880 | Hara | May 1990 | A |
4953252 | Akisawa | Sep 1990 | A |
4982469 | Nishiwaki | Jan 1991 | A |
5322015 | Gasparrini | Jun 1994 | A |
5367955 | Hara | Nov 1994 | A |
5373789 | Waizmann | Dec 1994 | A |
5479857 | Braun | Jan 1996 | A |
5519914 | Egan | May 1996 | A |
5644986 | Gydesen | Jul 1997 | A |
5727470 | Kurzer | Mar 1998 | A |
5758577 | Ebina | Jun 1998 | A |
5842418 | Corrado | Dec 1998 | A |
5918545 | Pym | Jul 1999 | A |
5964007 | Wisniewski | Oct 1999 | A |
6237484 | Homma et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6645349 | Koivukunnas | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6694879 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7011025 | Egan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7754051 | Porco | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020000168 | Fuseki et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040244618 | Egan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050061182 | Ebina | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060230963 | Birger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64-16657 | Jan 1989 | JP |
3-90945 | Sep 1991 | JP |
9-76473 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9-295398 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2001-162774 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-270087 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2008-062650 | Mar 2008 | JP |
9700173 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9746388 | Dec 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Patent Office Notice of Rejection, mailed Jan. 21, 2014, issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-514963, filed May 6, 2010, 8 pages (English summary). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/033813 filed May 6, 2010, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140144469 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12482793 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 14055787 | US |