Japanese Opposition by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. against Japanese Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits. |
Japanese Opposition by Rexham Industries Corp. against Japanese Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits. |
Japanese Opposition by Nissha Printing Co., Ltd. against Japanese Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits. |
Fuchs, “A State of the Art-Evaluation of Hot Stamping Decorative Plastic,” SME Technical Paper No. FC 77-647 (1977). |
Toyo Aluminum K.K., “The Orientation of Aluminum Pigments in Automotive Finishes,” Polymers Paint Colour Journal, p. 796 (1980). |
“Brilliant Performance,” Rexham Corporation (1987). |
“Solvent Cast Films,” Plastics Engineering, pp. 29-33 (1987). |
Affidavit of Dennis Northrop. |
Affidavit of Victor H. Rampelberg and supporting exhibits. |
Anonymous, “Research Disclosure” (1984). |
Ullman et al., “Mechanical Properties of Blends of Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Poly(vinylidene fluoride),” Composites Science and Technology 23:97-112 (1985). |
BP&R, pp. 29-30 (1985). |
“Automotive Coatings: Helping Detroit Woo Customers,” Chemical Week, p. 30 (1984). |
“Dateline: Detroit SAE Show News Bulletins Plastic body panels for tomorrow's cars, vans and trucks . . . ,” Plastics Technology (Apr. 1986). |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—Memorandum of Law in Support of Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—“Rexam's Motion No. 2 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—Rexam's Motion No. 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery (vol. I of II). |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery (vol. II of II). |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries,v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK—Avery's Statement of Disputed Facts in Support of Avery's Oppositions to Rexam's Motions 1 and 2. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK—“Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK—Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 2 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK—“Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK—“Avery's Appendix of Documents in Opposition to Rexam's Summary Judgment Motions”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—“Rexam's Reply in Support of Its Motion No. 1 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv371-MU—“Rexam's Reply in Support of Its Motion No. 2 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—“Rexam's Reply in Support of Its Motion No. 3 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-MU—“Supplemental Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion No. 1, 2 and 3 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery”. |
Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, 84:5 (May 1982). |
“The Driving Force in Laminates,” Avery International Thermark, (1985). |
Miller, “Composite Structures: Next Wave in Detroit,” Plastics World, pp. 30-34 (1986). |
General Motors Painted Products Specification 9984065 (1965). |
Chattha et al., “New Nonaqueous Dispersions for High Solids Base Coat/Clear Coat Paints,” J. Coatings Technol. 57:41-44 (1985). |
General Motors Painted Products Specification No. 9984052 (1982). |
Bongaerts, “Flat Film Extrusion Using Chill-Roll Casting,” In: Plastics Extrusion Technology. Hensen et al., eds., Hanser Publishers, New York, δδ 6.1-6.2 (1988). |
Modern Plastics Guide to Plastics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, pp. 32-34 (1981). |
European Opposition by Rexam Industries Corp. against European Patent No. EP 0285071 and attached exhibits. |
General Motors Painted Products Specification 9984065 (1985). |
Chattha et al., “New Nonaqueous Dispersions for High Solids Base Coat/Clear Coat Paints,” J. Coatings Technol. 57:41-44 (1985). |
General Motors Painted Products Specification No. 9984052 (1982). |
Bongaerts et al., “Flat Film Extrusion Using Chill-Roll Casting,” In: Plastics Extrusion Technology, Hensen et al., eds., Hanser Publishers, New York, δδ6.1-6.2 (1988). |
Modern Plastics Guide to Plastics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, pp. 32-34 (1981). |
In the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, Rexam Industries Corp. v. Avery Dennison Corporation, Civil Action 3:94CV271-MCK, “Order” dated Jan. 19, 2001, 55 pages. |
European Opposition by Rexam Industries Corp. against European Patent No. EP 0352298 and attached exhibits. |