--
The present invention relates to a system for generating isotopes useful for medical purposes, such as Mo-99, I-131, Xe-133, Y-90, Cs-137, I-125, and others, and in particular to a system employing a dry, granulated, uranium compound.
Medical isotopes are employed in nuclear medicine where they may be administered to a patient in a form that localizes to specific organs or cellular receptors where they may be imaged with special equipment. Medical isotopes may also be used in the treatment of disease exploiting the tissue-destructive power of short-range ionizing radiation after such localization.
Today, most radioisotopes used in nuclear medicine are produced in nuclear reactors employing highly enriched uranium (HEU). The reactors used for the production of Mo-99 for the United States are outside of the United States requiring the export of HEU and an attendant risk of nuclear proliferation associated with such out-of-country shipments.
It has been proposed to generate medical isotopes using low enriched uranium (LEU) which cannot be used directly to manufacture nuclear weapons. Systems for this purpose are described in US patent applications: 2011/0096887 entitled: “Device and Method for Producing Medical Isotopes” and 2010/0284502 entitled: “High Energy Proton or Neutron Source” hereby incorporated by reference.
In these systems, ions are directed through a target volume holding a gas to generate neutrons. The neutrons may expose a parent fissile material held in solution near the target volume in a fissile solution vessel. In one embodiment the target volume is annular and placed around a cylindrical fissile solution vessel holding the parent material solution. Ions are injected in a spiral through the target volume producing neutrons directed inwardly toward the parent material and outwardly toward a reflector.
Neutrons received in the neutron rich parent fissile material (such as LEU uranium) experience a multiplication in which neutrons striking the parent material generate additional neutrons which strike additional neutron rich material in a chain reaction. In a nuclear reactor, at steady power, the effective neutron multiplication factor (keff) is equal to 1. In a subcritical system, keff is less than 1.
One problem with aqueous reactors is that it can be difficult to maintain a stable power level. This is because there exist strong feedback mechanisms in the neutron multiplication factor as the temperature of the fissile solution rises and as voids are generated (gas bubbles caused by radiolysis breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen). The rapid reduction in the neutron multiplication factor results in a decrease in power, which causes the neutron multiplication factor to increase again. In particular, a control system that is trying to maintain constant power in the reactor may not be able to react sufficiently fast to adequately control the system. The result is a system with an unstable power level and potential safety impacts.
Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/373,899 filed Dec. 5, 2011, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes an improved geometry for such aqueous reactors providing a fissile solution vessel in the form of a reduced thickness annulus. By controlling the aspect ratio of the annulus, improved reaction stability is employed and enhanced cooling provided.
A significant disadvantage of these aqueous processes is that the fission fragments transfer substantial fission energy to the water medium. This energy causes the water molecules to break up into explosive hydrogen and oxygen gas and corrosive species such as hydrogen peroxide. The gases must be recombined in a separate system adding complexity to the aqueous processes and the concentration of hydrogen peroxide may build up in the water and may have to be controlled. Because the fission reactivity of these reactors decreases significantly as the water heats up and/or is radiolysed, and the density drops, recombined water must be returned to the vessel or new water added during operation. Also the pH of the solution has to be monitored and kept acidic to prevent the solution from precipitating.
The present invention provides an improved method and apparatus for generating medical isotopes using a dry-phase granular uranium material such as a uranium compound such as uranium salt or uranium oxide. After irradiation in the dry state, the granular uranium material is dissolved in a solvent and the extraction of the medical isotopes may proceed as is done with aqueous reactors. Eliminating water from the granular uranium material during the irradiation reduces the risk of explosion from hydrogen and oxygen generated by radiolysis, the problems of pH control and water makeup, and other complexities attendant to aqueous reaction. The resulting process is more temperature stable and the processing can operate at temperatures higher than the boiling point of water for more efficient cooling. The granular uranium material is readily dissolved for simplified handling after irradiation.
Specifically then, the present invention provides a method of producing medical isotopes by exposing a dry granular uranium material to radiation to produce the medical isotopes by nuclear reaction. The irradiated uranium material then dissolved in a solvent, typically an acid, and separated from the dissolved uranium material by standard aqueous separation techniques, to provide an isolated medical isotope.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to eliminate the disadvantages associated with aqueous solutions of uranium salt in producing hydrogen and oxygen through radiolysis such as creates: explosion risks, reaction stability problems, and the need for water makeup during production. It is further an object of the invention to eliminate the need for pH control of an aqueous solution and to avoid operating temperature limitations imposed in the processing of aqueous solutions.
The method may include the step of recrystallizing the granular uranium material by removing the water and recycling the dry granular uranium material through the process again.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide efficient use of the uranium materials.
The method may include the step of cooling the dry granular uranium material by fluid flow in thermal physical contact with the dry uranium salt during irradiation.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a simple method of temperature control of the granular uranium material without the need for an aqueous solution.
The granular uranium material may be a compound such as a uranium salt or uranium oxide.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a system that may work with available and well-understood uranium compounds.
The dry granular uranium material may be held in multiple containers and the solvent may be introduced into the containers to dissolve the reacted uranium granular uranium material in the containers for removal from the container in solution form.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a simple method of transferring granular uranium material in dry form out of the containers.
The method may include placement of one or more radiation reflectors near the dry granular uranium material during irradiation.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to enlist the radioactivity of the granular uranium material in supporting the desired reaction.
The reaction vessel may include control elements that may be used to controllably absorb radiation and move the control elements to maintain at or near-critical reaction during irradiation.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a system that may operate as a critical nuclear reactor greatly simplifying its construction.
Alternatively, the radiation may be produced by an electrically powered neutron generator irradiating the dry granular uranium material in a sub-critical reactor.
It is thus a feature of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a system that may operate sub-critically for simple control.
These particular objects and advantages may apply to only some embodiments falling within the claims and thus do not define the scope of the invention.
Referring now to
As depicted, the containers 12 may be cylindrical tubes closed at one end and having a lid 15 at the opposite end that may be used to provide a removable and replaceable watertight seal providing an enclosed volume within the container 12. The container 12 make be constructed of a radiation resistant alloy metal such as zircaloy-4 or the like.
At this stage in the process, the granular uranium material 14 is substantially free of all liquid water. Preferably the granular uranium material 14 are loosely packed in the container 12, however, to be either readily removable by pouring or to allow for ready infusion of a solvent at a later stage of the process for dissolving the granular uranium material 14. The granular uranium materials may be a compound such as uranium oxide or uranium salt. The uranium salts may, for example, be uranyl nitrite or uranyl sulfate. Other salts such as uranyl fluoride and uranyl phosphate may also be used. The uranium oxides may, for example, be triuranium octoxide (U3O8), uranium dioxide (UO2), or uranium trioxide (UO3). Other uranium oxides may also be used.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
The remaining water/uranium salt mixture 24 may be recrystallized by a recycler 28, for example, by cooling the water/uranium salt mixture 24 to promote crystallization of the uranium salts followed by a decanting of the water and/or thermal evaporation of the water. The reconstituted dry uranium granular material 14 may then be replaced in a container 12 and this process repeated per the foregoing description.
Referring now to
The outside of the reaction chamber 31 may be bounded by a cylindrical outer annular reflector 36 surrounding and coaxial with an annular reaction chamber 31. This reflector, for example, may be an aluminum walled chamber filled with a reflector material 38 which, in one embodiment, may be heavy water having a volume, for example, of 1000 liters. The reflector material 38 increases the generation efficiency by reflecting neutrons back into the reaction chamber 31 and therefore may also permit reaction control by draining water from the reflector 36 thus reducing the neutron reflection into the reaction chamber 31. This approach may also be used in controlling a critical reactor assembly as will be discussed below.
Referring now to
During the irradiation process, the containers 12 and the contained dry granular uranium material may be controlled in temperature by natural convection or a pumping of a chilled fluid around them, for example, a chilled gas or liquids such as water. In the case where cooling water is used, a thin water jacket around each container 12 may be employed or the size of the reaction chamber 31 carefully limited to reduce the necessary volume of water and thereby suppress an undesirable feedback mechanism in neutron multiplication factor caused by voids generated in the water (gas bubbles caused by radiolysis breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen) changing the neutron multiplication factor.
Referring now to
In addition or alternatively, each container 12 may provide for a pair of flushing connections 47, one that will receive water 42 from an external source and introduce it into the container 12, and one that will expel the received water into the accumulating container 20 during the extraction of the granular uranium material 14 from the container 12 per the discussion of
Referring also to
A simulation was performed on a double row of containers 12 arranged according to the parameters of following Table I in a critical reaction chamber per
As shown in
It will be generally appreciated that the annular reaction chambers 31 and 58 need not be a cylindrical annulus but may take on other annular shapes such as a polygonal and that the term annular should be understood to include an annulus having an upper and/or lower solid base. Generally, each of the components including the neutron multipliers and reflectors may be cooled by water jackets that are not shown. The circulation of chilled water within the water jackets may be controlled by a feedback controller to control the temperature of the water to a predetermined value or to a dynamic value based on a monitoring of the general reaction rate by other means. In addition, the feedback controller may manage other control variables such as control of height of the water and/or control rods to control reaction rates. Generally, the medical isotope generator 10 will be further shielded with concrete and water according to standard practices. Other isotopes such as 131I, 133Xe, and 111In may also be produced by a similar structure.
Referring now to
The dump valve 72 may be activated for example by an external guide linkage 74 or cable and may be biased by a spring or the like (not shown) to an open state for fail-resistant operation. In the open state, the dump valve 72 allows the granular uranium material 14 to drop rapidly into the lower portion 70 where the granular uranium material 14 is geometrically separated and/or isolated by neutron absorbing barriers 76 to rapidly quench an ongoing nuclear reaction. The system may be used independently or together with the control rods described above.
Certain terminology is used herein for purposes of reference only, and thus is not intended to be limiting. For example, terms such as “upper”, “lower”, “above”, and “below” refer to directions in the drawings to which reference is made. Terms such as “front”, “back”, “rear”, “bottom” and “side”, describe the orientation of portions of the component within a consistent but arbitrary frame of reference which is made clear by reference to the text and the associated drawings describing the component under discussion. Such terminology may include the words specifically mentioned above, derivatives thereof, and words of similar import. Similarly, the terms “first”, “second” and other such numerical terms referring to structures do not imply a sequence or order unless clearly indicated by the context.
When introducing elements or features of the present disclosure and the exemplary embodiments, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of such elements or features. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements or features other than those specifically noted. It is further to be understood that the method steps, processes, and operations described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed.
It is specifically intended that the present invention not be limited to the embodiments and illustrations contained herein and the claims should be understood to include modified forms of those embodiments including portions of the embodiments and combinations of elements of different embodiments as come within the scope of the following claims. All of the publications described herein, including patents and non-patent publications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under DE-FOA-0000323 awarded by the US Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3799883 | Arino | Mar 1974 | A |
3940318 | Arino et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4017583 | Motojima et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4332843 | Ahuja | Jun 1982 | A |
5910971 | Ponomarev-Stepnoy et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917874 | Schlyer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6222896 | Jia et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6337055 | Betenekov et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7796720 | Rubbia | Sep 2010 | B1 |
8249211 | Buckley | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8989335 | Tsang | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20030152187 | Ritter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20090162278 | Ravn et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100215137 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284502 | Piefer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110096887 | Piefer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110129049 | Schenter | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110280356 | Tsang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110305308 | Su | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120300891 | Piefer | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130142296 | Piefer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000284096 | Oct 2000 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of International Application No. PCT/US2013/070750. |
OCDE/NEA Expert Group on Criticality Accident Analysis Silene Pulsed Experiments, Silene-Heu-Sol-Step, S10300/1 S2-300/S3-300, Commisariat A L'Energie Atomique, Direction Des Applications Militaires, Department de Recherche Sur Les Materiaux Nucleaires, Service on Neutronique at Criticite, Siege, France. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140153684 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |