1. Technical Field
The present system and method generally relate to load coils, and more particularly to an xDSL (Digital Subscriber Line) compatible load coil for conditioning POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service)-band signals while permitting xDSL signals to traverse the load coil with low attenuation.
2. Description of Background Art
Load coils, also referred to as “loading coils,” are conventionally positioned along long local loops to improve POTS, or voice-grade, communications over the loop. Conventional load coils are inductive devices that are positioned along a local loop to compensate for, or counteract, the distributed parallel capacitance of the local loop. Such use of load coils generally conditions long local loops for POTS-band communications by flattening out the POTS band up to about 3.6 KHz. These load coils, however, also significantly limit, or prevent, the provision of digital services over a loaded loop due to the attenuation conventional load coils impart to higher frequency signals, such as ADSL (Asymmetric DSL) signals.
ADSL signals, for example, typically reside between about 26 KHz-1.1 MHz and are highly attenuated by conventional load coils. Indeed, in the past, load coils are routinely removed from local loops in order to provide ADSL service over such loops. The removal of such load coils, in turn, impairs or prevents the provision of POTS service over long loops, such as over loops longer than about 18,000 feet.
A need exists, therefore for an improved load coil that compensates for the distributed parallel capacitance of a local loop while permitting passage of higher frequency digital signals.
Additional background details regarding DSL technology more generally are described in Understanding Digitial Subscriber Line Technology by Starr, Cioffi, and Silverman, Prentice Hall 1999, ISBN 0137805454 and in DSL—Simulation Techniques and Standards Development for Digital Subscriber Line Systems by Walter Y. Chen, Macmillan Technical Publishing, ISBN 1578700175, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
A passive load coil for disposal along a local loop for improving transmission of POTS-band signals and primarily low attenuation passage of higher frequency signals across the loop includes inductive elements for conditioning the loop to improve transmission of POTS-band signals and capacitive elements for facilitating passage of the higher frequency signals, such as xDSL signals, over the local loop. The load coil improves POTS performance and passes signals above the POTS band, such as xDSL signals, with significantly less attenuation than conventional load coils.
In one embodiment, the load coil includes a coupled inductor having an inter-winding capacitance and capacitive elements for significantly increasing the effective inter-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor. Pursuant to one particular embodiment, the capacitive elements may comprise a pair of capacitors each having a capacitance in the range of about 5 nF-82 nF, and preferably a value of about 39 nF. One capacitor is disposed between the input of a first inductor winding and the input of the second inductor winding; the other capacitor is disposed between the output of the second inductor winding and the output of the first inductor to increase the effective inter-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor for improving high frequency signal transmission across the load coil.
In another embodiment, the load coil includes a coupled inductor having an intra-winding capacitance and capacitive elements for increasing the effective intra-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor. Pursuant to one particular embodiment, the capacitive elements may comprise a pair of capacitors each having a capacitance in the range of about 5 nF-82 nF, and preferably a value of about 39 nF. Each capacitor is positioned in parallel with one of the windings of the coupled inductor to increase the effective intra-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor for improving high frequency signal transmission across the load coil.
According to another embodiment, a system for transmitting POTS and xDSL signals over a local loop includes an xDSL repeater and a load coil positioned in cascaded fashion along the local loop. The load coil includes inductive elements for conditioning the loop to improve POTS-band transmissions and capacitive elements to permit xDSL signals to traverse the load coil with low attenuation. The load coil included within the repeater may be configured differently from the load coil disposed in cascaded fashion with the repeater. The repeater amplifies the xDSL signals to compensate for the attenuation of the xDSL signals as they traverse the loop.
Additional details and features of the present system and method will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Moreover, as those skilled in the art will appreciate, the central office 102 and each of the customer premises 104 and 106 includes DSL termination equipment, such as a DSL modem or the like, for transmitting and receiving DSL signals over the associated local loop.
A load coil 124 is disposed along the local loop 114 between the central office 102 and the customer premises 104 to condition the loop for transmission of POTS-band signals and includes inductive elements, such as a coupled inductor, for compensating for, or counteracting, the distributed capacitance, or parallel capacitance of the local loop 114. The inductive elements flatten out the frequency response of the local loop for signals below about 3.6 KHz. Importantly, the load coil 124 also includes capacitive elements for significantly increasing the effective inter-winding or intra-winding capacitance of the load coil to permit higher frequency signals associated with the provision of digital services, such as xDSL service, to traverse the load coil 124 with significantly less attenuation than with conventional load coils. Thus, both POTS-band and higher frequency signals may traverse the local loop 114 simultaneously, with the POTS-band signals being conditioned by the load coil 124 and the higher frequency signals, such as xDSL signals, passing across the load coil 124 with little, if any, attenuation.
A loop 116 is illustrated as having a load coil 130, a repeater 132, a load coil 134, and a repeater 136 disposed in cascaded fashion along the loop 116 to provide POTS and digital services over the loop 116 to the customer premises 106. Additional details of the load coil 130, which may be identical to the load coils 124 and 134 are described below with reference to
As those skilled in the art are generally aware, DSL signals are attenuated as they travel along a local loop, such as the local loop 116. The repeaters 132 and 136 are disposed along the loop 116 between the central office 102 and the customer premises 204 to at least partially compensate for the DSL signal attenuation by amplifying the transmitted DSL signals. Additional details of the repeaters 132 and 136, which may be configured identically, are described below with reference to FIG. 2.
Further,
According to one embodiment, the loop 116 comprises a loop length of about 20,250 feet of 24 AWG twisted pair cabling with a distance of about 2,250 feet between the central office 102 and the load coil 130. The loop distance between the load coil 130 and the repeater 132 is about 4,500 feet. The loop distance between the repeater 132 and the load coil 134 is about 4,500 feet. The loop distance between the load coil 134 and the repeater 136 is about 4,500 feet. The loop distance between the repeater 136 and the customer premises is about 4,500 feet. In this configuration, the repeaters 132 and 136 provide xDSL signal amplification and, preferably, some loop conditioning. The load coils 130 and 134 provide additional loop conditioning and permit passage of xDSL signals with little or no significant attenuation. Thus, according to one embodiment, the loop 116 may provide POTS and xDSL services over a loop having a length of 20,250 feet.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other separation loop distances may be employed. For example, in another embodiment using 26 AWG twisted pair cabling, the loop distance between the central office 102 and the load coil may be about 3,000 feet with the remaining repeaters and load coils being spaced apart by loop distances of 6,000 feet for a total loop length of about 27,000 feet.
In general, the hybrid coupler 222 receives downstream DSL signals from the central office 102 (
Similarly, the hybrid coupler 224 receives upstream DSL signals from the customer premises 106 along the local loop 116 and outputs the upstream DSL signals to the upstream filter 212 along line 242. The hybrid coupler 224 also receives amplified downstream DSL signals from the downstream amplifying element 204 along line 244 and transmits the downstream DSL signals onto the local loop 116 for transmission to the customer premises 106.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, where the hybrid coupler 222 is imperfect, at least a portion of the upstream amplified DSL signal received via the line 234 will leak through the hybrid coupler 222 onto the line 232. Likewise, where the hybrid coupler 224 is imperfect, at least a portion of the downstream amplified DSL signal received via the line 244 will leak through the hybrid coupler 224 onto the line 242. Without the presence of the filters 202 and 212, this DSL signal leakage could cause a phenomenon known in the art as “singing”—that is oscillations caused by introducing gain into a bi-directional system due to signal leakage.
The signal leakage problem is overcome, or substantially alleviated, through the use of the downstream filter 202 and the upstream filter 212. One version of Category 1 ADSL upstream signals generally occupy the frequency spectrum between about 26-120 KHz and ADSL downstream signals generally occupy the frequency spectrum between about 138 KHz-1.104 MHz. The downstream filter 202 substantially prevents leaked upstream signals from being transmitted back to the customer premises 106 by significantly attenuating signals between 26 KHz and 120 KHz for ADSL. Likewise, the upstream filter 212 is configured to provide significant attenuation to signals between about 138 KHz-1.104 MHz for ADSL. For other varieties of DSL, such as VDSL, the filters 202 and 212 respectively attenuate signals outside the downstream and upstream frequency bands, although the limits of these bands may be different than those for the ADSL variety.
The repeater 132 includes POTS loading coils 252 coupled to the loop 116 to improve transmission of voice, or POTS, frequency signals over long loop lengths, such as those longer than about 18,000 feet. In one embodiment, the POTS loading coils 252 comprise a coupled inductor having an inductance of about 88 mH.
The hybrid 222 is illustrated as being capacitively coupled to the local loop on the central office side of the POTS loading coils 252 along lines 262 and 264. A capacitor 266 (27-68 nF) is disposed along the line 262 to capacitively couple the hybrid 222 to the loop 116 on the central office side of the POTS loading coils.
Similarly, the hybrid 224 is illustrated as being capacitively coupled to the local loop 116 on the customer premises side of the POTS loading coils 252 along lines 272 and 274. A capacitor 276 (27-68 nF) is disposed along the line 272 to capacitively couple the hybrid 224 to the loop 116 on the customer premises side of the POTS loading coils.
Additional details of the repeater 132 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/569,470 entitled “DSL Repeater” filed May 12, 2000 by Brian Hinman, Andrew Norrell and James Schley-May, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/670,475 entitled “Load Coil and DSL Repeater Including Same” filed on Sept. 26, 2000 by Brian Hinman, Andrew Norrell, Carl Alelyunas, and James Schley-May the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The load coil 130 is shown as including inductor windings 302 and 304 wrapped about an inductor core to form a coupled inductor 308 disposed along the loop 116. In one embodiment, each winding has an inductance of about 33 mH to create a coupled inductor 308 having an inductance of about 66 mH. In another embodiment, the coupled inductor 308 comprises a pair of 44 mH windings to create a coupled inductor having an inductance of about 88 mH. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the coupled inductor 308 is positioned along the loop 116 to compensate for, or counteract, the parallel, or distributed, capacitance of the loop 116 to improve POTS-band signals over the loop 116.
In particular, the coupled inductor 308 is shown as having a lead 312 coupled to the winding 302 input and a lead 314 coupled to the winding 302 output. Similarly, the input of the winding 304 has a lead 316 coupled thereto and the output of the winding 304 has a lead 318 coupled thereto.
The load coil 130 also includes capacitive elements, such as capacitors 320 and 322, to increase the effective inter-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor 308 for permitting higher frequency signals, such as xDSL signals, to traverse the load coil 130 with low attenuation. As shown, the capacitor 320 is disposed between the lead 312 of winding 302 and the lead 316 of the winding 304. The capacitor 322 is disposed between the lead 318 of the winding 304 and the lead 314 of the winding 302. In this configuration, the capacitors 320 and 322 increase the effective inter-winding capacitance of the coupled inductor 308.
In one embodiment, the capacitors 320 and 322 each have a capacitance of at least about five times, and preferably at least about 10 times the inter-winding capacitance of each of the windings 302 and 304. According to one implementation, the capacitors 320 and 322 each have a capacitance in the range of about 5-50 nF. In another implementation, the capacitors 320 and 322 each have a capacitance in the range of about 10-82 nF. In one application, capacitors 320 and 322 have a capacitance of about 39 nF. In another application, the capacitors 320 and 322 each have a capacitance of about 26 nF.
The presence of the capacitors 320 and 322 generally facilitate passage of higher frequency signals, such as signals in the ADSL band, from one end of the load coil to the other with much lower attenuation than without such capacitors, thereby permitting effective ADSL signal transmission over a loop loaded with the present load coil 130. As mentioned above, in the past, conventional load coils must be removed from a loop in order to provide digital services, such as ADSL service over the loop. The load coil 130, however, may be present in a local loop to condition the loop without preventing the provision of digital services, such as xDSL service, over the loop.
Moreover, like the capacitors 320 and 322 of
The load coil 130 of
As shown, the plot 502 shows a great deal of high frequency signal attenuation in the ADSL band (about 26 KHz-1.1 MHz). Indeed, the ideal load coil is shown as imparting about 50 dB of attenuation to 100 KHz signals.
Plot 504 illustrates that one embodiment of a real world load coil also imparts a great deal of high frequency signal attenuation to signals in the ADSL band. As shown, one embodiment of a common conventional load coil imparts over 25 dB of attenuation to ADSL signals between about 26-110 KHz.
In contrast, as shown by plot 506, the load coil 130 of
The invention has been described above with reference to specific embodiments. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The foregoing description and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is related to and claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/262,492 entitled “DSL Compatible Load Coil” filed Jan. 17, 2001 by Andrew Norrell and James Schley-May, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application also relates to commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/569,470 entitled “DSL Repeater” filed May 12, 2000 by Brian Hinman, Andrew Norrell and James Schley-May, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/670,475 entitled “Load Coil and DSL Repeater Including Same” filed on Sep. 26, 2000 by Brian Hinman, Andrew Norrell, Carl Alelyunas, and James Schley-May the disclosures of which are also hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
761995 | Pupin | Jun 1904 | A |
1711653 | Quarles | May 1929 | A |
3476883 | Birck | Nov 1969 | A |
3578914 | Simonelli | May 1971 | A |
3848098 | Pinel | Nov 1974 | A |
4259642 | Derby | Mar 1981 | A |
4277655 | Surprenant | Jul 1981 | A |
4768188 | Barnhart et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4788657 | Douglas et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4970722 | Preschutti | Nov 1990 | A |
5049832 | Cavers | Sep 1991 | A |
5095528 | Leslie et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5623485 | Bi | Apr 1997 | A |
5724344 | Beck | Mar 1998 | A |
5736949 | Ong et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5790174 | Richard, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5859895 | Pomp et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5892756 | Murphy | Apr 1999 | A |
5909445 | Schneider | Jun 1999 | A |
5912895 | Terry et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929402 | Charles et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5991311 | Long et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005873 | Amit | Dec 1999 | A |
6029048 | Treatch | Feb 2000 | A |
6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058162 | Nelson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084931 | Powell, II et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091713 | Lechleider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091722 | Russell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6128300 | Horton | Oct 2000 | A |
6154524 | Bremer | Nov 2000 | A |
6188669 | Bellenger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195414 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208670 | Milliron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226322 | Mukherjee | May 2001 | B1 |
6236664 | Erreygers | May 2001 | B1 |
6236714 | Zheng et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246695 | Seazholtz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262972 | McGinn et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263047 | Randle et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266348 | Gross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266395 | Liu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281454 | Charles et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343114 | Chea, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345071 | Hamdi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345072 | Liu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351493 | Reed et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370188 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385234 | Ashley | May 2002 | B1 |
6385252 | Gradl | May 2002 | B1 |
6385253 | Swisher | May 2002 | B1 |
6507606 | Shenoi et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6546100 | Drew | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20020001340 | Shenoi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020106076 | Norrell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113649 | Tambe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020141569 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60262492 | Jan 2001 | US |