In U.S. Pat. No. 6,474,118 entitled SCISSORS LATCH LOCK issued Nov. 5, 2002 to Richard A. Martinez, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, a lockable latch and strike are disclosed that can be mounted on members, structures or devices that are to be moved toward each other to close or closed positions that are to be secured by locked engagement of the latch with the strike. Toward this end, the latch has a generally rectangular housing from which extends a single post-like projection having a tapered outer end that facilitates insertion of the post-like projection into a single opening defined by the strike.
The latch of the aforementioned Martinez patent also has a pair of latch bolts, inner end regions of which extend into and are pivotally connected to the housing. Outer end regions of the latch bolts are movable between unlatched and latched positions. When in the unlatched positions, the latch bolts reside closely alongside the single post-like projection of the latch in a tight, compact array that facilitates inserting the outer end region of the post-like projection and the outer end regions of the latch bolts into the single opening of the strike. When in the latched positions, the outer end regions of the latch bolts project away from each other and from opposite sides of the single post-like projection to enable the bolt-carried tooth formations to engage latching formations that are defined by the strike at locations near opposite end regions of the single opening of the strike.
When the latch of the Martinez patent is to engage its strike, the outer end region of the post-like projection and the outer end regions of the latch bolts are inserted in a tightly grouped array into the opening of the strike, whereafter the outer end regions of the latch bolts are moved away from each other and away from opposite sides of the post-like projection of the latch to engage the latching formations of the strike. When the outer ends of the latch bolts and the post-like projection are in a tightly grouped array that permits their being inserted into and withdrawn from the strike's opening, the latch bolts are said to be in their unlatched positions. When the outer end regions of the latch bolts are moved away from each other and away from opposite sides of the outer end region of the post-like projection to bring the tooth formations into latching engagement with the latching formations of the strike, the latch bolts are said to be in their latched positions.
If the outer end region of either of the latch bolts latchingly engages its associated strike-defined latching formation, the latch is, in fact, latched into engagement with the strike because even one such latching engagement prevents the latch from being moved out of engagement with the strike. Thus, only when neither of the latch bolts latchingly engages its associated strike-defined latching formation is the latch actually unlatched from the strike because only then can the latch be separated from the strike by withdrawing the latch bolts and the post-like projection from the single opening of the strike.
Although the latch bolts of the lockable latch disclosed in the Martinez patent do not rely on housing-carried springs to establish or to maintain their latched engagement with the strike, the latch does rely on a pair of housing-carried springs to disestablish latched engagement of the latch with the strike by moving the outer end regions of both of the bolts from their extended latched positions to their retracted unlatched positions so the post-like projection and the latch bolts can be withdrawn from the opening of the strike.
Each of the housing-carried springs of the latch disclosed in the Martinez patent is relatively small and relatively weak. Each of these springs biases only an associated one of the two latch bolts toward its unlatched position. Neither of these springs serves to “backup” the action of the other. If one should fail to perform its intended function, the other is not designed to attempt to perform the function of the spring that failed. Thus, if one or both of these relatively small, relatively weak housing-carried springs should fail (for example, as the result of fatigue, breakage or simply due to its insufficiently small biasing force) to retract one or both of the latch bolts at a time when an owner operator has used a correctly configured key to turn a key-operated plug of the latch from the locked position to the unlocked position, the latch will remain in latched engagement with the strike—which is to say that the latch will not respond, as intended, to the unlocking efforts of the owner operator to release its engagement with the strike.
Because the tooth formations on the outer end regions of the latch bolts of latches of the type disclosed in the Martinez patent often tightly engage the latching formations of their associated strikes, the relatively weak housing-carried springs of these latches sometimes fail to dislodge, release and move the tooth formations from latchingly engaging the associated strikes. Thus, it is known for one or both of the latch bolts to remain stuck in latched engagement with the strike, which prevents withdrawal of the post-like projection and the associated latch bolts from the strike opening.
In other words, the latch does not release: it does not unlatch despite repeated turnings of the key-operated plug of the latch from the locked to the unlocked position. And, when repeated turnings of the key-operated plug of one of these latches (from locked to unlocked positions) brings no corresponding unlatching movement of one or both of the associated latch bolts, the owner operator may become frustrated, and may be inclined to pound or pry on the latch and/or the strike in an effort to dislodge the stuck latch bolts so they will move properly to their unlatched positions under the influence of their housing-carried springs.
Because latch damage may occur if latches or their associated strikes are pounded or pried on during efforts to dislodge and jar loose one or both of the toothed latch bolts from latched engagement with the associated strike, a need exists for an improved form of latch that includes a mechanism designed to effect positive movement of the associated latch bolts from latched to unlatched positions when the associated key-operated plug is turned from locked to unlocked positions. What is needed is a latch that does not depend on the action of springs to move its latch bolts from latched to unlatched positions, and therefore will not need to be pounded on or pried to jar one or both of its latch bolts out of latched engagement with the associated strike when the key-operated plug of the latch is turned from a locked to an unlocked position.
Yet another shortfall of latches and strikes of the type disclosed in the Martinez patent stems from their reliance on insertion of a single post-like projection of the latch into a single opening of the associated strike to effect proper alignment (of the movable members, structures or devices on which the latches and strikes are mounted) when the latches are to be moved into latching engagement with their associated strikes. Relying on the tapered outer end region of only one post-like projection being inserted into only one strike-defined opening to align members, structures or devices that carry a latch and strike for movement toward close or closed positions that are to be maintained by locked engagement of the latch and strike can prove frustrating and awkward, and can lead to bending or breakage of the single post-like projection and/or the outer end regions of the associated latch bolts, especially if the latch bolts should move away from opposite sides of the post-like projection (where the tooth formations of the latch bolts are intended to be shielded from contact by the post-like projection) thereby exposing one or more of the tooth formations to unwanted contact at the same time that efforts are under way to align and insert the post-like projection into the opening of the associated strike.
An improved latch is desired that provides a stronger and more reliable device than is afforded by a single post-like projection which is intended to be aligned with and inserted into a single strike-defined opening as disclosed in the Martinez patent for aligning latch- and strike-carrying members during their movement toward close or closed positions that are to be maintained by latched engagements of the associated latch bolts with their associated strikes.
The present invention relates to a latch having a pair of posts that extend from a housing to shield portions of a pair of oppositely movable latch bolts that are insertable with the posts into spaced openings of a strike and are engageable with the strike to retain in close or closed relationship a pair of relatively movable members, structures or devices to which the latch and the strike may be separately connected. In some embodiments, the latch is lockable to retain latched engagement of the latch bolts with the strike.
In some embodiments, a latch has a housing from which project two substantially parallel extending posts configured to be insertable concurrently into openings defined by a strike at locations on opposite sides of a latching formation also defined by the strike. First and second latch bolts are slidable on the housing, each extending along a separate one of the posts to define at least one tooth formation that is engageable with the latching formation when the posts of the latch are inserted into the openings of the strike. A plug is rotatable on the housing and is drivingly connected by first and second links to the first and second latch bolts, respectively. The plug and the links are cooperable to slide the latch bolts toward each other when the plug is turned in one direction, and away from each other when the plug is turned in an opposite direction.
If the latch is to be lockable, then, in some embodiments, the plug is provided with a keyway into which a suitably configured key can be inserted and turned to turn the plug and thereby cause the latch bolts to move toward or away from each other in response to turning the plug clockwise or counterclockwise.
In the accompanying drawings:
Referring to
Referring to
In the latch embodiment shown in the drawings hereof, the plug 130 takes the form of a key cylinder having a forwardly opening keyway 131 into which a conventional, suitably configured conventional key (for example of the type disclosed in the Martinez patent) can be inserted and turned to turn the plug 130 relative to the housing 110 so the latch 100 can be locked after the latch 100 is latchingly engaged with the strike 200 (i.e., after latch bolts 140, 141 of the latch 100 have been moved to the latched position of
In non-locking embodiments of the latch 100, a knob or other conventional graspable formation (not shown) is preferably provided near the front of the plug 130 instead of the depicted keyway 131 so the plug 130 can be manually turned to move the latch bolts 140, 141 toward and away from each other in response to turning the plug 130 in one direction or another (i.e., counterclockwise or clockwise) relative to the housing 110 about a forwardly-rearwardly extending axis 135 shown in FIGS. 2 and 5-8.
If the plug 130 is not a lock cylinder but rather is provided with a knob or other form of graspable formation (not shown) that facilitates turning the plug 130, it is preferred that the plug 130 also be provided with one of a wide variety of conventional spring-biased ball detent formations (not shown) that is engageable with one or more recesses (not shown) defined by the housing 110 to assist in releasably retaining or detenting the plug 130 in one or more of the orientations to which it can be turned about the axis 135, preferably including the position shown in
If the plug 130 is provided with a knob or other graspable formation instead of the depicted keyway 131 (i.e., if the plug 130 does not constitute a lock cylinder into which a key can be turned to move the latch bolts 140, 141 between the positions that are illustrated in
Referring to FIGS. 4 and 8-10, one way of connecting the front and rear members 112, 114 of the housing 110 is to provide the front member 112 with rearwardly extending pin-like projections 117 that can extend rearwardly through openings 118 of the rear member 114 where rear ends of the pin-like projections 117 are crimped as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The latch 100 latchingly engages the strike 200 (i.e., the latch bolts 140, 141 latchingly engage the latching formations 215 of the strike 200) either when one or both of the tooth formations 440, 441 extend(s) beneath or behind one or both of the latching formations 215 in a manner causing one or both of the latching formations 215 to extend into one or both of the notches 1440, 1441 (as is typically depicted in
Because the latch bolts 140, 141 move in unison between the retracted/unlatched positions shown in
Because the latching formations 215 are situated relatively close together, it is possible for the latching formations 215 (and the central portion of the strike 200 that defines the latching formations 215) to pass between the post-like formations or posts 120, 121 of the latch 100 as the posts 120, 121 are inserted into the spaced openings 220, 221 of the strike 200. Because the latch bolts 140, 141 are not intended to be “slammed” into latched engagement with the strike 200, the latch 100 must be prepared prior to being engaged with the strike 200 by turning the plug 130 to retract the latch bolts 140, 141 to the positions shown in
Turning the plug 130 approximately a quarter turn in one direction causes the latch bolts 140, 141 to move from the retracted, spaced-apart, unlatched or unlocked positions of
If the plug 130 is a key cylinder, then the plug 130 preferably is internally structured in any of a variety of conventional ways that are well known to those who are skilled in the art to enable the suitably configured key to be inserted into and removed from the keyway 131 when the plug 130 is turned to one or more desired orientations, in this case preferably only when the key cylinder 130 is turned to the locked position shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As can be seen in
Referring to
To bring the latch bolts 140, 141 into latched engagement with the latching formations 215 of the strike 200, the latch bolts 140, 141 must first be “retracted” from their closely spaced latched positions by moving them to their relatively widely separated “unlatched” positions as depicted in
When retracted as depicted in
If, for example, the posts 120, 121 are substantially fully inserted into the strike-defined openings 220, 221 when the latch bolts 140, 141 are moved toward each other (i.e., toward the latched positions of the latch bolts 140, 141 depicted in
Alternatively, if the latch bolts 140, 141 are moved toward each other when the posts 120, 121 are only partially inserted into the strike-defined openings 220, 221, it is likely that the latching formations will be received in the notches 1540, 1541 of the latch bolts 140, 141 adjacent the tooth formations 540, 541, which means that attempted withdrawal of the posts 120, 121 from the openings 220, 221 will be prevented when the formations 215 come into engagement with the tooth formations 540, 541.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the depicted pair of latching formations 215, and the two pairs of tooth formations 440, 540 and 441, 541 can be replaced by different numbers of pairs of similar or differently configured formations to provide other types of latched engagement between the latch bolts 140, 141 and a suitably configured strike component, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention contemplated herein.
In
Referring to
The embodiment disclosed in the drawings brings several advantages into play that do not obtain with the latch disclosed in the referenced Martinez patent. Instead of providing a pair of latch bolts that pivot to and from positions extending along a single post-like projection, and instead of relying on the biasing action of housing-carried springs to effect unlatching movements of the latch bolts, the dual-action latch disclosed in the drawings hereof provides a pair of slidably movable latch bolts situated at spaced locations wherein each of the latch bolts is associated with a separate one of two post-like projections, and wherein each of the latch bolts is caused to move (not only from its unlatched position to its latched position, but also from its latched position to its unlatched position) by the positive driving action of links that connect the latch bolts to a plug or key cylinder that, when turned in one direction will cause positive unlatching movement of both of the latch bolts, and when turned in the opposite direction will cause positive latching movement of both of the latch bolts. In the depicted embodiment, neither latch bolt can move independently of the other, and no springs are relied on to effect latch bolt movement.
As regards the strike, instead of relying on latching formations provided at opposite ends of a single strike-defined opening to engage closely spaced latch bolts, the embodiment depicted in the drawings hereof utilizes latching formations provided at ends of a pair of spaced strike-defined openings to engage correspondingly spaced latch bolts.
Instead of utilizing tooth formations that project from opposite outer sides of a single post-like projection and readily can be damaged if they should accidentally move from their protected unlatched positions so as to be inappropriately engaged during efforts to align and insert the post-like projection into a strike-defined opening, the embodiment depicted in the drawings hereof utilizes pairs of tooth formations that face inwardly toward each other at locations between spaced post-like projections, and the tooth formations are well shielded from undesired engagement by their associated post-like projections.
Although the invention has been described in its preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred form has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is intended that such patentable features as are disclosed herein be protected by the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of the filing by Michael O. Misner on Apr. 22, 2006 of provisional application Ser. No. 60/794,214, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference also is made to a design application Serial No. 29/258,512 filed Apr. 22, 2006 by Michael O. Misner, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
406903 | Hebert | Jul 1889 | A |
441674 | Kubler | Dec 1890 | A |
745664 | Reiger | Dec 1903 | A |
789775 | Ward | May 1905 | A |
1143653 | Smith | Jun 1915 | A |
1366706 | Schoell | Jan 1921 | A |
1410581 | Langer | Mar 1922 | A |
1426122 | Stern | Aug 1922 | A |
1510561 | Segal | Oct 1924 | A |
1512141 | Segal | Oct 1924 | A |
1520976 | Stern | Dec 1924 | A |
1524048 | Maliin | Jan 1925 | A |
1526110 | Bachmann | Feb 1925 | A |
1533629 | Best | Apr 1925 | A |
1546645 | Freysinger | Jul 1925 | A |
1563914 | Muzzio | Dec 1925 | A |
1564883 | Muzzio | Dec 1925 | A |
1601359 | Harrington | Sep 1926 | A |
1836209 | Viehweger | Dec 1931 | A |
1977853 | Kemp | Oct 1934 | A |
2002014 | Kemp et al. | May 1935 | A |
2004746 | Boyko | Jun 1935 | A |
2173671 | Webber | Sep 1939 | A |
2181393 | Crooks | Nov 1939 | A |
2224671 | Crooks | Dec 1940 | A |
2720774 | Gehrie | Oct 1955 | A |
2887865 | Moler | May 1959 | A |
2943878 | Rigaud | Jul 1960 | A |
3177022 | McKee et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3532373 | Poe | Oct 1970 | A |
3603632 | Grass | Sep 1971 | A |
3857594 | Pastva, Jr. | Dec 1974 | A |
3899201 | Paioletti | Aug 1975 | A |
4534191 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4836707 | Myers | Jun 1989 | A |
5171048 | Weinerman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192096 | Weinerman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193861 | Juga et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209530 | Kolloch | May 1993 | A |
5402662 | Osada | Apr 1995 | A |
5516162 | Takaishi | May 1996 | A |
5791171 | Kelley | Aug 1998 | A |
5823030 | Theriault et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D408711 | Bianco | Apr 1999 | S |
5907962 | Smithson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
D435427 | Sokurenko | Dec 2000 | S |
D436833 | Turner et al. | Jan 2001 | S |
6474118 | Martinez | Nov 2002 | B2 |
7063361 | Lawrence | Jun 2006 | B1 |
D532674 | Schwalie et al. | Nov 2006 | S |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60794214 | Apr 2006 | US |