The present invention relates to a temporary fastener, and more specifically to a disposable clamp.
Modern aircraft are manufactured from numerous panels and other parts that are fastened together with rivets, screws, bolts, and other permanent fasteners. To aid in assembly, parts are typically held together with temporary clamps and fixtures until permanent fasteners can be installed. Parts that incorporate sealant on the mating surfaces require that the temporary clamps exert sufficient force to squeeze excessive sealant from the joint while pulling parts together before the sealant fully cures. Heavy structures fastened with 5/16″-size permanent fasteners, for example, require in excess of 500 pounds clamp load to squeeze the sealant out to an acceptable thickness and hold the components together. Other applications, such as in wing-to-body joints, require upwards of 1500 pounds with 5/16″-size fasteners to temporarily secure components. The clamp load requirements for other sizes are generally proportional to the cross-sectional area of the basic fastener diameter.
Blind hole clamps are desirable for airframe assembly, because their installation and removal can be more easily automated than the installation and removal of conventional bolts and nuts. However, existing blind hole clamps do not have a blind head large enough to avoid surface damage on the blind side panel when high clamp loads are imparted.
Oftentimes, one or more work pieces are joined with clamps to maintain part orientation during an autoclave curing cycle. Threaded-type reusable blind clamps are capable of high clamp loads, but lack the smooth shank needed to avoid clogging with resin as the parts are cured. As a result, the clamps are difficult to remove and may damage the work pieces upon removal. Blind tack rivets may have the required smooth shank but are incapable of imparting sufficient clamp load to maintain parts in the required orientation. Conventional slave bolts are not capable of automated installation and removal.
In addition, threaded temporary blind clamps are easily clogged with sealant and resins, making removal from assemblies difficult and necessitating cleaning before they may be reused. Another problem with threaded temporary fasteners is that they protrude above the accessable panel surface by a relatively large amount. Accordingly, robotic assembly equipment must retract or back away from each panel to avoid collisions with installed clamps. As a result, installation of threaded temporary fasteners requires additional time to traverse from one location to another.
Finally, the clamping capability of threaded temporary clamps is limited, because the blind head is discontinuous and high clamp loads result in surface damage to the work pieces. Temporary blind tack rivets have a low profile but must be removed by drilling through the manufactured head. Drilling through the head, however, generates metal chips that frequently damages panel surfaces. Oftentimes, for example, the rivet spins in the hole during the drilling operation, halting the advance of the drill bit through the tack rivet and prolonging the removal cycle time. Tack rivets also have very low clamp loads and produce a blind-side upset that is not suitable for use in laminated composite panels.
Slave bolts may consist of a conventional nut and bolt or a pull-type lock bolt with a swage collar. Slave bolts may provide a non-clogging shank, non-drill out removal and high clamp loads. However, slave bolts require access to both sides of the work pieces and, in many cases, two operators to install. Two-sided installations are difficult and costly to automate.
Therefore, a need exists for a clamp, or a temporary fastener, having a smooth cylindrical shank without grooves, threads and other discontinuities that may become clogged with sealant or cured resin and which is capable of high clamp loads (greater than 500 pounds for a 5/16″ size clamp) without damaging fragile panel surfaces. In addition, a need exists for a low profile temporary clamping fastener capable of installation and removal from a single accessible side of the work pieces, preferably by robotic equipment, in a manner that does not generate drilling debris. A one-sided installation and removal process is desired for saving labor costs over a conventional two-person operation using nuts and bolts. Finally, a need exists for a temporary fastener having a predetermined geometry to control installation clamp loads rather than allowing the installation force to be controlled by outside influences, such as, operator skill.
A clamp may having a core bolt in threaded engagement with an expander is provided. The clamp may have a smooth shank positioned between the expander and a wrenching end of the core bolt. The shank may have an integral flange adjacent the fracturing at a predetermined compression load. The core bolt may have a first and a second break groove capable of fracturing at predetermined compression loads. A spacer may be engaged with the shank to prevent rotation of the shank during installation of the clamp. A nut may optionally be provided. The nut may be in threaded engagement with the core bolt and may rotate with the core bolt during installation.
Objects and advantages together with the operation of the invention may be better understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in connection with the following illustrations, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to
In a preferred embodiment, a first break groove 24 is positioned at a second end of the core bolt 14, opposite the expander 12. A second break groove 26 is positioned between the first break groove 24 and the first end of the core bolt 14. The first break groove 24 and the second break groove 26 may be weakened portions of the core bolt 14 that fail at predetermined torque or compression loads. In an exemplary embodiment, the first break groove 24 is sized to fail prior to the second break groove 26, as shown in
As discussed above,
A shank 16 may be positioned between the first end of the core bolt 14 and the expander 12. In a preferred embodiment, the expander 12 may be rotationally keyed to the shank 16 such that rotation of the shank 16 rotates the expander 12, as shown in
The shank 16 has a flange 28 extending outward from the outer diameter of the shank 16. The flange 28 may be an enlarged portion extending in a direction perpendicular to the length of the shank 16. In a preferred embodiment, the flange 28 is integrally formed with the shank 16. The flange 28 may be sized such that the flange 28 limits the amount of the clamp 10 that may be inserted into the work pieces 30a, 30b. At a predetermined axial load, the flange 28 shears loose from the shank 16 and may allow the clamp 10 to move further into the work pieces 30a, 30b.
A spacer 18 may be positioned at an end of the shank 16. In an embodiment, the spacer 18 engages a flange 28 of the shank 16 and may prevent rotation of the shank 16 when torque is applied to the core bolt 14. The spacer 18 may have wrenching flats 40 for engagement with wrenching tools, for example, a tool to prevent rotation of the shank 16. The spacer 18 may have a bore 31 in which the core bolt 14 may extend there through.
A protuberance or boss 29 may extend from an end of the shank 16 opposite the expander 12. The spacer 18 may be positioned at an end of the shank 16 adjacent the protuberance 29. The bore 31 of the spacer 18 may be an interference fit with the protuberance 29 of the shank 16 such that the shank 16 is rotationally restrained. The protuberance 29 of the shank 16 extends into and frictionally fits within the spacer 18. In an embodiment, the protuberance 29 and the bore 31 in the spacer 18 are non-circular to rotationally key the shank 16 and the spacer 18 together. For example, the bore 31 and the protuberance 29 may have corresponding shapes such that relative rotation is prevented. The spacer 18 may be positioned such that the underside of the spacer 18 abuts the flange 28 of the shank 16.
A washer 21 may be positioned between the spacer 18 and an end of the core bolt 14. In one embodiment, the washer 21 may be a thrust washer to spread the compressive stresses over a larger area than without the washer 21. Bearing surfaces 80 of the core bolt 14 may bear against a top side 82 of the washer 21, as best illustrated in
The clamp 10 may be installed by an automated process or by automated equipment, such as robotic equipment. For example, after inserting the clamp 10 into aligned apertures in the work pieces 30a, 30b, a tool 100 may engage the spacer 18 and the wrenching surfaces 40 of the spacer 18. In one embodiment, the clamp 10 may be inserted into a top surface 30c of the work piece 30a and may extend through to a blind side 30d of the work piece 30b as illustrated in
The installation of the clamp 10 may be controlled by controlling the installation torque, or by use of the first break groove 24 and the second break groove 26. For example, when the torsion required to continue rotating the core bolt 14 exceeds the strength of the first break groove 24, a portion 15 of the core bolt 14 severs as shown in
Advantageously, the tool 100 may be used to install and to remove the clamp 10. To this end, the clamp 10 may effectively be used as a temporary fastener for clamping panels and other objects together. In addition, drilling to remove the clamp 10 is eliminated. Accordingly, the damage caused by off-center drilling and the generation of metal chips caused by drilling are eliminated.
In addition, the bulbing nature of the expander 12 ensures that clamp loads are spread over a relatively large area to avoid damaging the work pieces 30a, 30b. The pre-bulbed geometry of the expander 12 ensures that the apertures of the work pieces 30a, 30b do not become rounded or otherwise damaged. In an embodiment, the expander 12 may have a flanged end 32, as illustrated in
Advantageously, the clamp 10 avoids clogging with resins and other sealants due to the cylindrical and smooth shape of the shank 16. The design, shape and size of the clamp 10 allows incorporation of the clamp 10 into many applications where known rivets and clamps are not suitable, such as, in use with composite material cured in autoclave.
The grip range of the clamp 10 may correspond to or may be controlled by the length of the spacer 18. For example, the spacer 18 may have a length sufficient to receive the shank 16 after the flange 28 shears loose. A low profile for efficient robotic applications is possible by limiting the grip range. For example, a 5/16″-size clamp having a ⅜″ gripping range may have an installed protrusion approximately one inch above the accessible-side of the work pieces 30a, 30b.
In another embodiment, the clamp 10 has a nut 60 that is at least partially engaged with the core bolt 14 as illustrated in
During removal of the clamp 10, the nut 60 may be fixed and prevented from rotation by, for example, a clutch. An outer surface 41 of the nut 60, for example, may be engaged by a one-way clutch, a roller-type clutch or other structure that allows rotation of the nut 60 during installation but prevents rotation of the nut 60 when the core bolt 14 is rotated in the removal direction. Upon removal, the core bolt 14 unthreads from the nut 60 and the expander 12. The expander 12 may remain keyed to the shank 16 which remains keyed to the spacer 18.
In such an embodiment, the first break groove 24 may be incorporated into the clamp 10 and may be dependent upon whether the clamp 10 is configured for installation with torque-controlled tools. The second break groove 26 may be absent in this embodiment since removal may be accomplished by unthreading the core bolt 14 from the assembly, rather than fracturing the core bolt 14 to separate components of the clamp 10. Of course, the first break groove 24 and the second break groove 26 may be incorporated in such an embodiment as will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. Second break groove 26 and nut 60 in combination with threaded core bolt 14 as shown in
Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing detailed description, it is to be understood that the present invention is not to be limited to just the preferred embodiment disclosed, but that the invention described herein is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the scope of the claims hereafter.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/849,515 entitled “DUAL-ACTION DISPOSABLE CLAMP” filed on Oct. 5, 2006; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/857,700 entitled “DUAL-ACTION DISPOSABLE CLAMP” filed on Nov. 8, 2006; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/901,171 entitled “DUAL-ACTION DISPOSABLE CLAMP WITH CLUTCH NUT” filed on Feb. 13, 2007, which are each hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
612316 | Downes | Oct 1898 | A |
748078 | Kaisling | Dec 1903 | A |
2282711 | Eklund | May 1942 | A |
2409352 | Gill | Oct 1946 | A |
2763314 | Gill | Sep 1956 | A |
2863351 | Vaughn | Dec 1958 | A |
2915934 | La Torre | Dec 1959 | A |
2971425 | Blakeley | Feb 1961 | A |
3085463 | Lay | Apr 1963 | A |
3136203 | Davis | Jun 1964 | A |
3236143 | Wing | Feb 1966 | A |
3253495 | Orloff | May 1966 | A |
3258887 | Mostoller | Jul 1966 | A |
3277771 | Reynolds | Oct 1966 | A |
3322449 | Becker | May 1967 | A |
3345900 | Villo | Oct 1967 | A |
3461771 | Briles | Aug 1969 | A |
3505921 | Wigam | Apr 1970 | A |
4007659 | Stencel | Feb 1977 | A |
4015505 | Murray | Apr 1977 | A |
4033222 | Wilson | Jul 1977 | A |
4112813 | Kuhlmann et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4122753 | Kuhlmann et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4168650 | Dahl et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4203346 | Hall et al. | May 1980 | A |
4237768 | Volkmann | Dec 1980 | A |
4263834 | Dudash | Apr 1981 | A |
4457652 | Pratt | Jul 1984 | A |
4519735 | Machtle | May 1985 | A |
4579491 | Kull | Apr 1986 | A |
4602902 | Herb | Jul 1986 | A |
4659271 | Pratt et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4692076 | Herb | Sep 1987 | A |
4714391 | Bergner | Dec 1987 | A |
4747204 | Pratt | May 1988 | A |
4752169 | Pratt | Jun 1988 | A |
4772167 | Beals | Sep 1988 | A |
4854793 | Ollivier et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865499 | Lacey | Sep 1989 | A |
4875815 | Phillips, II | Oct 1989 | A |
4929134 | Bergner | May 1990 | A |
4950115 | Sadri | Aug 1990 | A |
4979857 | Wing | Dec 1990 | A |
4984945 | Bergner | Jan 1991 | A |
4988247 | Summerlin | Jan 1991 | A |
5030050 | Auriol | Jul 1991 | A |
5044849 | Starke | Sep 1991 | A |
5066179 | Pratt | Nov 1991 | A |
5152648 | Pratt | Oct 1992 | A |
5213460 | Sadri et al. | May 1993 | A |
5486079 | Martin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498110 | Stencel et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5569005 | Millington | Oct 1996 | A |
5603592 | Sadri et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620287 | Pratt | Apr 1997 | A |
5634751 | Stencel et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651649 | Sadri et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5759001 | Smith | Jun 1998 | A |
5779410 | Lautenschlager | Jul 1998 | A |
5816761 | Cassatt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5947667 | Cassatt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6007009 | Sheridan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6062783 | Austin | May 2000 | A |
6062788 | Ying-Feng | May 2000 | A |
6213697 | Uejima | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224309 | Yamamoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6247883 | Monserratt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6537005 | Denham | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547500 | Cosenza | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6746191 | Edland | Jun 2004 | B2 |
RE38664 | Luhm | Nov 2004 | E |
6868757 | Hufnagl et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893196 | Wille | May 2005 | B2 |
6896460 | Enomoto | May 2005 | B2 |
6935821 | Bodin et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7681426 | Main et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8075234 | McClure | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020146298 | Cosenza et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030183045 | Junkers | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040022596 | Belanger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033119 | Hufnagl et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050123372 | Sato | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050201845 | Keenen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060062650 | Kenner | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070243035 | Pratt | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243037 | Pratt | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080044252 | Scheinberger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2006 012 668 | Nov 2006 | DE |
1889688 | Feb 2008 | EP |
WO 0104499 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2008045360 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from PCT/US2009/039083. |
International Search Report from PCT/US2008/080114. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2010/028832. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2010/042317. |
Extended European Search Report from EP07839322.0 filed Oct. 5, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action received in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/098,857, mailed Dec. 3, 2010. |
Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2012 received in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/098,857, filed Apr. 7, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080213063 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60849515 | Oct 2006 | US | |
60857700 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60901171 | Feb 2007 | US |