Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6329954
-
Patent Number
6,329,954
-
Date Filed
Friday, April 14, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, December 11, 200122 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 343 895
- 343 726
- 343 727
- 343 729
- 343 730
- 343 793
- 343 797
- 343 711
- 343 893
- 343 725
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A combination satellite and terrestrial antenna system for a single-source application. A first embodiment includes a cross dipole for receiving the circularly polarized satellite signals, and a plurality of monopoles for receiving linearly polarized terrestrial signals. The mono-poles are arranged symmetrically about the cross dipole. Alternative embodiments include a helix antenna for receiving the satellite signals, and one or more linear antennas arranged symmetrically with respect to the helix for the terrestrial signals.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to antenna systems, and more particularly to dual-antenna systems.
A variety of dual-transmitter broadcasting formats are under development. Such formats include simultaneous transmission of signals from both satellite transmitters and terrestrial (or land-based) transmitters. Two of such formats those identified by the trademark SIRIUS RADIO and the trademark XM RADIO. Both formats have published transmission specifications. The satellite transmissions cover the vast majority of the geographic broadcast area. The terrestrial transmissions complement the satellite coverage primarily in urban areas where the satellites may be blocked from a receiver by a building.
New antennas for receiving the dual-transmission signals are required, especially for automotive applications. The antennas (e.g. whips and window grids) typically used in the automotive area adequately receive signals from terrestrial transmitters. However, the radiation patterns of monopoles have their best reception at low elevation angles with nulls at the zenith. Therefore, monopoles are incapable of receiving signals from satellite transmitters.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The aforementioned problems are overcome in the present invention wherein a dual-antenna system, appropriate for automotive applications, is capable of receiving both satellite transmission signals and terrestrial transmission signals. The system includes a first antenna for receiving satellite transmissions and a second antenna for receiving terrestrial transmissions. The terrestrial antenna is one or more antenna elements arranged either concentrically with, or in a symmetrical configuration with respect to, the satellite antenna.
In a preferred embodiment, the satellite antenna is a cross dipole, and the terrestrial antenna is a plurality of monopoles arranged symmetrically about the cross dipole. In an alternative embodiment, the satellite antenna is a quadrifilar helix, and the terrestrial antenna is a monopole or sleeve dipole positioned concentrically within the helix. In another alternative embodiment, the system includes a helix and a plurality of monopoles arranged symmetrically about the helix.
In the disclosed embodiment, the satellite elements are packaged and housed within a relatively low profile, aesthetically pleasing housing for mounting on a vehicle body panel, such as the roof.
The present invention is capable of receiving both satellite transmissions and terrestrial transmissions. The antenna system can be tuned to meet the SIRIUS RADIO format or the XM RADIO format, and can be scaled to other frequencies. The antenna therefore provides operability heretofore unavailable in an antenna system, particularly in the automotive field.
These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will be more readily understood and appreciated by reference to the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
shows preferred embodiment of the antenna system of the present invention mounted on an automotive vehicle within a dual-transmitter single-service broadcast area;
FIG. 2
is a schematic diagram of the antenna system;
FIG. 3
is a side elevation view of the antenna system;
FIG. 4
is a top plan view of the antenna system;
FIG. 5
is a perspective exploded view of the antenna system;
FIG. 6
is a top perspective view of the antenna system with the radome removed;
FIG. 7
is a bottom perspective view of the antenna system;
FIG. 8
is a side schematic view of the antenna elements;
FIG. 9
is a top schematic view of the antenna elements;
FIG. 10
is an elevation radiation pattern for the satellite antenna in the antenna system;
FIG. 11
is an azimuth radiation pattern for the satellite antenna;
FIG. 12
is an elevation radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna in the antenna system;
FIG. 13
is an azimuth radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna;
FIG. 14
is an elevation radiation pattern for the satellite antenna when the terrestrial antenna is not present;
FIG. 15
is an azimuth radiation pattern for the satellite antenna when the terrestrial antenna is not present;
FIG. 16
is a side schematic view of an alternative antenna system having only one monopole for a terrestrial antenna;
FIG. 17
is a top schematic view of the antenna system illustrated in
FIG. 16
;
FIG. 18
is an elevation radiation pattern for the satellite antenna of the system illustrated in
FIGS. 16 and 17
;
FIG. 19
is an azimuth radiation pattern for the satellite antenna of the antennas system illustrated in
FIGS. 16-17
;
FIG. 20
is an elevation radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna of the antenna system illustrated in
FIGS. 16-17
;
FIG. 21
is an azimuth radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna of the antenna system illustrated in
FIGS. 16-17
;
FIG. 22
is a side view of a first alternative embodiment of the antenna system;
FIG. 23
is a top plan view of the first alternative embodiment;
FIG. 24
is a side schematic view of the antenna elements of the first alternative embodiment;
FIG. 25
is a top schematic view of the antenna elements of the first alternative embodiment;
FIG. 26
is a side view of a second alternative embodiment of the antenna system;
FIG. 27
is a top plan view of the second alternative embodiment;
FIG. 28
is a side schematic view of the antenna elements of the second alternative embodiment;
FIG. 29
is a top schematic view of the antenna elements of the second alternative embodiment;
FIG. 30
is a side view of a third alternative embodiment of the antenna system;
FIG. 31
is a top plan view of the third alternative embodiment;
FIG. 32
is a side schematic view of the antenna elements of the third alternative embodiment;
FIG. 33
is a top schematic view of the antenna elements of the third alternative embodiment;
FIG. 34
is an elevation radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna of the third alternative embodiment illustrated in
FIGS. 30-33
;
FIG. 35
is a side view of a fourth alternative embodiment of the antenna system;
FIG. 36
is a top plan view of the fourth alternative embodiment;
FIG. 37
is a side schematic view of the antenna elements of the fourth alternative embodiment; and
FIG. 38
is a top schematic view of the antenna elements of the fourth alternative embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
I. Dual-Transmitter Service Applications
FIG. 1
illustrates an automobile
10
within a dual-transmission single-service environment. As noted in the Background of the Invention, such broadcasting formats are currently under development. Two known formats are those being developed under the trademark SIRIUS RADIO and the trademark XM RADIO. In such a format, the content is simultaneously broadcast from both satellite transmitters
20
and terrestrial (or land-based) transmitters
30
. Both types of transmitters operate in the same frequency band. In the case of SIRIUS RADIO, the band is at approximately 2.32 gigahertz (GHz). In the case of XM RADIO, the frequency band is at approximately 2.35 GHz.
Both the SIRIUS RADIO and XM RADIO formats have published specification identifying satellite reception coverage requirements and terrestrial reception coverage requirements. The terrestrial coverage area
40
and the satellite coverage area
50
illustrated in
FIG. 1
are generic illustrations of the basic thrust of these specifications. The two specifications are not identical, but they have the commonality of defining (1) an angle and strength of satellite coverage and (2) an angle and strength of terrestrial coverage. The radiation patterns illustrated in the drawings for this application include the SIRIUS RADIO specifications, but the invention is not limited to the SIRIUS RADIO format. The invention is readily adaptable to other formats.
A conventional automotive antenna, such as a whip or a window grid, is perfectly capable of receiving transmissions from the terrestrial transmitter
30
. However, the conventional antennas are not suited to receiving transmissions from the satellite transmitter
20
. Accordingly, the antenna system of the present invention has been developed to enable a receiver (not illustrated in
FIG. 1
) to receive signals from both the satellite transmitter
20
and the terrestrial transmitter
30
.
The antenna system
100
of the present invention preferably is mounted on the roof R of the automobile
10
. The roof acts as a ground plane for the antenna system
100
. Preferably, the antenna system
100
is mounted in the center of the roof to optimize performance. Alternatively, the antenna system
100
can be mounted at other locations on the roof or even other body panels. The position for the antenna system
110
ultimately selected by a car manufacturer will be based on a balance of aesthetics, performance, and receiver requirements.
II. Preferred Embodiment of the Antenna System
The preferred embodiment of the antenna system
100
is illustrated in
FIGS. 2-9
, and perhaps best illustrated in FIG.
5
. As seen in
FIG. 6
, the antenna system
100
includes a bent cross dipole antenna
110
and four monopole antennas
120
. The bent cross dipole antenna
110
is adapted to receive circularly polarized signals from the satellite transmitters
20
, and the monopole antenna elements
120
are adapted to receive signals from the terrestrial transmitters
30
. Accordingly, the cross dipole antenna
110
is referred to as the satellite antenna, and the monopole elements
120
together are referred to as the terrestrial antenna.
Turning to FIG.
5
and identifying the elements from top to bottom, the antenna system
100
includes a dome
130
, the cross dipole antenna
110
, the monopole antenna elements
120
, a printed circuit board
132
, a chassis
134
, and a gasket
136
.
The dome
130
(or radome) is a single piece that is injection molded of an appropriate plastic, such as ASA. The radome provides physical protection to the antenna elements and circuit board within the antenna system. The radome includes four integral lugs
138
for receiving screws (not shown) to intersecure the components of the antenna system
110
. Alternatively, the radome may be secured in position with adhesive—either alone or in combination with screws or other fastening means.
The printed circuit board
132
provides a physical support for both the cross dipole
110
and the monopoles
120
. The board
132
also carries devices electrically connected to the antenna elements and providing appropriate amplification of the signals received by the elements. The board
132
is otherwise generally well known to those skilled in the art.
The chassis
134
is a single piece of metal such as aluminum. The chassis
134
includes a solid floor
140
defining a central hole
142
through which the antenna leads (not shown in
FIG. 5
) pass. The chassis
134
also includes four integral lugs
42
which receive the screws
144
to secure the circuit board
132
to the chassis. The chassis
134
further includes four additional lugs
148
for receiving screws (not illustrated) that extend into the lugs
138
in the dome
130
. An O-ring
146
is included to provide a weather-tight seal between the dome
130
and the chassis
134
.
The gasket
136
is molded of a resiliently deformable material such as thermoplastic rubber. The gasket includes a first recessed area
150
into which the chassis
134
fits and a second recessed area or groove
152
into which the dome
130
fits. When all of the components are intersecured and assembled as shown, the antenna system is weather-tight and provides a weather-tight seal against the automobile
10
when the system is mounted on a vehicle body component.
Turning to
FIG. 7
, a pair of coaxial antenna leads
160
and
162
pass out of the antenna system
100
through the hole
142
(see FIG.
4
). A threaded lug
164
is secured within the hole
142
for attaching the antenna system
100
to the vehicle
10
and for protection of the antenna leads
160
and
162
.
FIG. 2
schematically illustrates the antenna system
100
mounted on the roof R and connected to a receiver
170
. Both the satellite antenna
110
and the terrestrial antenna
120
are connected to a low-noise amplifier (LNA)
172
mounted on the circuit board
132
(see also FIG.
5
). The antenna system
100
is mounted on the vehicle roof R which serves as a ground plane for the antenna. The coaxial antenna leads
160
and
162
extend through the vehicle roof R and are connected directly, or through other wiring, to the receiver
170
. Appropriate receivers are known to those skilled in the art and are not described here in detail. The receiver
170
includes circuitry for determining which antenna signal is used. The receiver can be mounted at a variety of locations within the vehicle such as behind the dash, in the trunk, or under a seat.
FIGS. 8 and 9
illustrate the antenna elements
110
and
120
schematically. The antenna element
110
is a bent, cross dipole antenna of the type generally known to those skilled in the antenna art. The antenna includes a pair of relatively stiff substrates
110
a
and
110
b
that physically interlock. The antenna elements
111
a
and
111
b
are printed, or otherwise formed, on the substrates
110
a
and
110
b
respectively, again using techniques known to those skilled in the art. The cross dipole antenna is particularly well suited to receive the circularly polarized transmissions used in satellite transmissions.
The antenna system
100
includes four monopole elements
120
that together comprise the terrestrial antenna. As perhaps best illustrated in
FIGS. 8-9
, the monopole elements
120
are arranged in a symmetrical configuration with respect to the cross dipole
110
. In the preferred embodiment of four monopoles, one monopole is positioned within each quadrant of the cross dipole. Alternatively, the monopoles
120
could be in the same plane as the cross dipole
110
, for example by positioning each monopole
120
on one of the substrates
110
a
or
110
b
. Other numbers and configurations of monopoles will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this specification. Also, the monopoles may be a combination of active and parasitic elements arranged in a substantially symmetric pattern. Each monopole is approximately 0.125 lambda to 0.25 lambda in length.
As will be appreciated from the radiation patterns illustrated in
FIGS. 10
et. seq., the symmetrical configuration of the monopoles
120
improves both the performance of the satellite antenna
110
and the terrestrial antenna
120
. The monopoles
120
are spaced equal angles from one another about the cross dipole
110
, and the monopoles also are spaced equal distances from one another. The number and position of the monopoles
120
and their height can be “tuned” to compliment both the satellite and terrestrial antennas. As used in this application, symmetric and symmetrical are intended to have their broadest meanings wherein one-half of the pattern is a reflection of the other half of the pattern about a point, a line, or a plane. The four monopoles are connected to a corporate feed using any such technique known in the art.
The two antennas are concentric. Specifically, the physical center of the cross dipole antenna
110
and the imaginary physical center of the coupled monopoles
120
are the same—namely at the intersection
174
of the substrates
110
a
and
110
b.
FIG. 10
is an elevation radiation pattern for the satellite antenna
110
within the antenna assembly
100
; and
FIG. 11
is the azimuth radiation pattern at elevation 25 degrees for the same antenna.
FIG. 12
is an elevation radiation pattern for the terrestrial antenna
120
within the antenna system
100
, and
FIG. 13
is an azimuth radiation pattern at elevation 10 degrees for the same antenna.
As illustrated in the azimuth radiation patterns of
FIGS. 11 and 13
, the azimuth coverage of both the satellite antenna and the terrestrial antenna is symmetric and uniform. The symmetrical positioning of the monopoles
120
with respect to the cross dipole
110
improves the radiation pattern of the satellite antenna
110
.
FIG. 14
is an elevation radiation pattern for the cross dipole antenna
110
without the monopoles
120
, and
FIG. 15
illustrates the azimuth radiation pattern of the same antenna. Such an antenna is not illustrated in the drawings.
FIGS. 14 and 15
are provided to illustrate the lesser performance (defined as inadequate pattern coverage) of the satellite antenna
110
when not “complimented” by the monopole antenna
120
.
FIGS. 16-17
illustrate an antenna that is not part of the present invention, and
FIGS. 18-21
show the radiation patterns for such an antenna. These figures are included to illustrate the symmetric design of the present invention. The antenna system
100
′ includes a satellite antenna
110
′ which is identical to the satellite antenna of the preferred embodiment. The assembly
110
′ also includes a single monopole terrestrial antenna
120
′ positioned within one quadrant of the cross dipole antenna. Consequently, the terrestrial antenna
110
′ is neither concentric with nor symmetrically spaced about the cross dipole antenna
120
′.
FIG. 18
illustrates the elevation radiation pattern of the satellite antenna
110
′ in the assembly
100
′. Similarly,
FIG. 19
illustrates the azimuth radiation pattern of the satellite antenna. As can be seen, both radiation patterns P
7
(
FIG. 18
) and P
8
(
FIG. 19
) evidence decreased performance of the antenna system
100
′ in comparison to the assembly
100
(see FIGS.
10
-
11
).
FIG. 20
illustrates the elevation radiation pattern of the single monopole
120
′.
FIG. 21
illustrates the azimuth radiation pattern of the same antenna. Again, both of the radiation patterns P
9
and P
10
show decreased performance in comparison to their counterparts P
3
and P
4
(
FIGS. 12-13
) for the antenna system
100
. Consequently, the inclusion of a plurality of monopoles in the terrestrial antenna symmetrically positioned with respect to the satellite antenna enhances the performance both of the satellite antenna and the terrestrial antenna. The symmetrical and/or concentric positioning of the two antennas with respect to one another is the reason behind the improved performance.
III. First Alternative Embodiment
An alternative embodiment
200
of the present invention is illustrated in
FIGS. 22-25
. Schematically as illustrated in
FIGS. 24-25
, the assembly
200
includes a quadrifilar (quad) helix antenna
210
and a terrestrial antenna including four monopoles
220
. As perhaps best illustrated in
FIGS. 23 and 25
, the monopoles are positioned around the satellite antenna
210
in a symmetrical pattern. In fact, the monopoles collectively are concentric with the satellite antenna
210
. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the quad helix antenna
210
is adapted to receive signals from a satellite transmitter. The monopoles
220
function as described in conjunction with the antenna system
100
. As illustrated in
FIG. 22
, the antenna system
200
includes a first dome
230
protectively encasing the antenna
210
and a second dome
231
protectively encasing the monopoles
220
.
The performance of the antenna system
200
is generally similar to that of the performance of the antenna system
100
. Accordingly, the radiation patterns associated with the assembly
200
will be extremely similar to the radiation patterns illustrated in
FIGS. 10-13
.
IV. Second Alternative Embodiment
A second alternative embodiment
300
of the antenna system is illustrated in
FIGS. 26-29
. For the satellite antenna, the assembly
300
includes a quad helix
310
generally identical to the quad helix
210
previously described. For the terrestrial antenna, the assembly
300
includes a single monopole
320
which is positioned concentrically within the quad helix
310
. A protective dome
330
is positioned over the antenna elements.
Again, the performance of the antenna system
300
is generally identical to that of the system
100
as illustrated in
FIGS. 10-13
, because of the concentric and/or symmetric relationship of the satellite antenna
310
and the terrestrial antenna
320
.
V. Third Alternative Embodiment
A third alternative embodiment
400
is illustrated in
FIGS. 30-33
. Assembly
400
is generally identical to assembly
300
with the exception that the terrestrial antenna
320
is a sleeve dipole antenna known in the art. The sleeve dipole
420
is positioned inside and concentric with the quad helix antenna
410
. Consequently, the two antennas are also symmetrical with respect to one another.
FIG. 34
illustrates the elevation radiation pattern of the sleeve dipole antenna
420
. The radiation pattern illustrates the improved horizon coverage of the sleeve dipole. With the exception of the differences in the radiation pattern illustrated in
FIG. 34
, the performance of the antenna system
400
is generally the same as the previously described antennas.
FIG. 35
illustrates an antenna system
500
that is not within the scope of the present invention. Specifically, the terrestrial monopole
520
is neither concentric with nor symmetric to the quad helix satellite antenna
510
. Accordingly, the performance of the antenna system
500
would be substantially similar to the performance illustrated in
FIGS. 18-21
.
All embodiments of the present invention provide the unanticipated benefit of high isolation between the satellite antenna and the terrestrial antenna. When the antennas are fed in-phase, the isolation is greater than 30 decibels (dB).
The above descriptions are those of preferred embodiments of the invention. Various alterations and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the Doctrine of Equivalents.
Claims
- 1. A dual-antenna system comprising:a circularly polarized antenna for receiving circularly polarized signals from a satellite transmitter, said circularly polarized antenna having a first output; and a linear antenna for receiving linear signals from a terrestrial transmitter, said linear antenna having a second output different from said first output, said circularly polarized antenna and said linear antenna being substantially concentric, said linear antenna including a plurality of linear antenna elements arranged symmetrically about said circularly polarized antenna.
- 2. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said circularly polarized antenna is a helix antenna.
- 3. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 2 wherein each of said linear antenna elements is a monopole antenna.
- 4. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said circularly polarized antenna comprises a cross dipole.
- 5. A dual-antenna system comprising:a first antenna for receiving and outputting circularly polarized signals, said first antenna having a center and a first output; and a second antenna for receiving and outputting linearly polarized signals, said second antenna having a center and a second output separate from the first output, said first antenna and said second antenna being substantially concentric, said second antenna including a plurality of linear antenna elements arranged in a substantially symmetric configuration about said first antenna.
- 6. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 5 wherein said first antenna comprises a cross dipole.
- 7. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 5 wherein said first antenna comprises a helix antenna.
- 8. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 5 wherein each of said linear antenna elements comprises a monopole antenna.
- 9. A dual-antenna system comprising:a cross dipole antenna having a cross dipole output; and a plurality of linear antenna elements arranged in a substantially symmetric pattern about said cross dipole antenna, said linear antenna elements having a linear output.
- 10. A dual-antenna system comprising:a cross dipole antenna; and four monopole antennas arranged in a substantially symmetric pattern about said cross dipole antenna with one of said monopole antennas located in each of the quadrants of said cross dipole antenna.
- 11. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 10 wherein said monopole antennas are equally spaced from one another.
- 12. A dual-antenna system comprising:a helix antenna having a first output; and a plurality of linear antennas arranged symmetrically with respect to said helix, said linear antennas having a second output different from said first output antenna.
- 13. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 12 wherein each of said linear antennas is a monopole antenna.
- 14. A dual-antenna system comprising:a helix antenna having a first output; and a plurality of monopole antennas arranged symmetrically with respect to said, said monopole antennas having a second output different from said first output helix antenna.
- 15. A dual-antenna system as defined in claim 14 comprising four of said monopole antennas.
US Referenced Citations (9)
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number |
Date |
Country |
19933723 |
Jan 2000 |
DE |
0957533 |
Nov 1999 |
EP |
2339969 |
Feb 2000 |
GB |
4134906 |
May 1992 |
JP |
6334436 |
Dec 1994 |
JP |
WO 0059070 |
Oct 2000 |
WO |