Aspects disclosed herein generally relate to a dual asymmetric compression driver.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,280,091 to Voishvillo discloses, among other things, a phasing plug that includes a base portion having an input side, an output side, a plurality of entrances on the input side, a plurality of exits on the output side arranged about a central axis, and a plurality of channels fluidly interconnecting the entrances with the respective exits. Each corresponding entrance, channel and exit establish an acoustical path from the input side to the output side that is non-radial relative to the central axis. Two phasing plugs may be provided in a dual compression driver.
In at least one embodiment, a dual asymmetric compression driver is provided. The dual asymmetric compression driver includes a first driver assembly and a first driver assembly. The first driver assembly is positioned about a central axis and includes a first annular diaphragm having a first planar section extending at a first clamping distance. The second asymmetric driver assembly is positioned about the central axis and includes a second annular diaphragm having a second planar section extending at a second clamping distance. The first clamping distance is different from the second clamping distance causing the first asymmetric driver to provide a first audio output in a first frequency range and the second asymmetric driver to provide a second audio output in a second frequency range.
In at least another embodiment, a dual asymmetric compression driver is provided. The dual asymmetric compression driver includes a first driver assembly and a second asymmetric driver assembly. The first driver assembly is aligned on a central axis and includes a first annular diaphragm having a first planar section extending at a first clamping distance. The first driver assembly provides a first audio output in a first frequency range. The second asymmetric driver assembly is aligned on the central axis and includes a second annular diaphragm having a second planar section extending at a second clamping distance. The second asymmetric driver assembly provides a second audio output in a second frequency range and the first clamping distance is different from the second clamping distance.
In at least another embodiment, a dual asymmetric compression driver is provided. The dual asymmetric compression driver includes a front driver assembly and a rear driver assembly. The front driver assembly is aligned on a central axis and includes a front annular diaphragm having a front inner planar section that extends at a front inner clamping distance and a front outer planar section that extends at a front outer clamping distance. The rear driver assembly is aligned on the central axis and includes a rear annular diaphragm having a rear inner planar section that extends at a rear inner clamping distance and a rear outer planar section that extends at a rear outer clamping distance. The front inner clamping distance and the front outer clamping distance is larger than the rear inner clamping distance and the rear outer clamping distance, respectively.
The embodiments of the present disclosure are pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. However, other features of the various embodiments will become more apparent and will be best understood by referring to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompany drawings in which:
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
A dual compression driver as set forth herein generally includes two motors and acoustically similar phasing plugs and diaphragms that are mechanically “tuned” to different frequency ranges. A summation of acoustical signals on common acoustical load provides extended frequency range compared to a dual compression driver that includes identical diaphragms. Theoretically maximum overall SPL sensitivity may be achieved by an in-phase radiation of the diaphragms. These aspects and others will be discussed in more detail below.
Conventional compression drivers may have several factors that limit their high-frequency range. Such factors may involve the diaphragm assembly's moving mass, compliance of air in a compression chamber, air resonances in the compression chamber, and a voice coil's inductance. One of the methods to increase the high frequency output level is to use full-metal (typically titanium) dome based diaphragm and surround exhibit high-frequency mechanical resonances (breakups). However, such resonances may cause an irregularity of the high-frequency response and the resonances are accompanied by a generation of strong nonlinear distortion including subharmonic distortion products that deteriorate sound quality.
The decrease of a compression chamber's air compliance helps to extend the level of a high-frequency signal. For example, the high level frequency may be reached by decreasing a clearance between a diaphragm and a phasing plug. However, the smaller height of the compression chamber may cause buzzing, increase nonlinear distortion due to nonlinear compression of air, limit maximum sound pressure level, or even cause collision of the diaphragm with the phasing plug. Reduction of the voice coil inductance may be provided through the use of conducting rings that are positioned in a voice coil gap which are typically made of copper. However, this aspect may make a voice coil gap wider magnetically and decrease the gap's magnetic induction and correspondingly, the motor force. The decrease of the moving mass in a conventional compression driver may be provided only by using a lighter moving assembly having a smaller diameter and lighter voice coil and diaphragm. A small voice coil is typically associated with a lower power handling capability and a higher thermal compression. High-frequency air resonances in the compression chamber may occur at frequencies where a radial dimension of the chamber is comparable or larger than a wavelength of the radiated signal. Existing methodologies of suppressing air resonances by positioning circular openings in the phasing plug at particular locations are based on an assumption of an infinitely rigid diaphragm. These aspects are set forth in “An Investigation of the Air Chamber of Horn Type Loudspeakers” to Bob Smith, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 25, No. 2, March, 1953, pp. 305-312 and in New Methodology for the Acoustic Design of Compression Driver Phase Plugs with Concentric Annular Channels” to Mark Dodd and Jack Oclee-Brown, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 57, No. 10, 2009 October, pp. 771-787.
However, in reality the assumption of an infinitely rigid diaphragm may not be valid when the diaphragm goes into partial vibrations at high frequencies, and in this case, the particular radial location of the phasing plug's circular slots may not contribute to suppression of the high-frequency resonances. These issues have been resolved to a significant degree in view of the dual compression drivers that are based on flexural annular diaphragms as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 8,280,091 (“the '091 patent”) to Voishvillo which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The '091 patent discloses, among other things, the concept of a “symmetric” dual diaphragm driver having two compression drivers that are merged into a single compact transducer with a single acoustical output. Each “half” is equipped with an identical annular, light, flexural polymer diaphragm. Each diaphragm is loaded by its own phasing plug, with a “meandering” distribution of acoustical exits to smear the air resonances in the compression chamber, and these two acoustically similar phasing plugs are connected to a single common acoustical load—horn or waveguide.
The dual asymmetric compression driver as set forth herein may be based on identical motors and on different phasing plugs whereby the annular diaphragms are mechanically “tuned” to different frequency ranges. Such an arrangement may optimize the performance of each diaphragm assembly for a dedicated frequency range. Both phasing plugs may face each other and may have centrally oriented slots that are acoustically connected to a common acoustical load. Two general types of asymmetric drivers may be considered. For example, a first type of asymmetric driver may present a “classical” two-way system with a comparatively narrow frequency range of overlapping, and the other type (or second type) of asymmetric driver may include the diaphragms that have a comparatively wide overlapping frequency range whereby the lower frequency range section is not limited at its high frequency range. This aspect contributes to an output of the other section. This type of configuration provides higher overall SPL output and maximum sensitivity is achieved when both diaphragms radiate in-phase in a mutual frequency range.
As shown in
The front driver assembly 201 includes a front phasing plug 202. The front phasing plug 202 includes a front base portion or body 204, which may be generally disk-shaped and lie in a plane orthogonal to the central axis 100, and may be generally centered about the central axis 100. A central bore 206 coaxial with the central axis 100 is formed through a thickness (axial direction) of the front base portion 204 to open at both an input side (facing upward from the perspective of
The rear driver assembly 203 includes a rear phasing plug 212. The rear phasing plug 212 includes a rear base portion (or rear base body) 214, which likewise may be generally disk-shaped and lie in a plane orthogonal to the central axis 100, and may be generally centered about the central axis 100. The rear phasing plug 212 may also include a hub portion 218 axially extending from an output side of the rear base portion 214. In the present example, the output side of the rear base portion 214 faces the output side of the front base portion 204. The hub portion 218 may be bullet-shaped and accordingly may be referred to as a bullet. That is, the diameter (coaxial with the central axis 100) of the outside surface of the hub portion 218 typically tapers in the axial direction to an apex or tip 222 located on the central axis 100. The tip 222 may be relatively sharp or may be domed. A diameter of the outside surface of the hub portion 218 at the rear base portion 214 is less than the inside diameter of the central bore 206. When assembled, the hub portion 218 extends through the central bore 206 and, if provided, through the conduit 208 to an axial elevation above the front phasing plug 202. The rear phasing plug 212 may also include an annular mounting structure 224 axially extending from an input side of the rear base portion 214, which may facilitate mounting the rear phasing plug 212 to underlying components as will be described further below.
As further illustrated in
An inner portion of the front annular diaphragm 230 may be mounted axially between the front base portion 204 and a front inner annular glue ring 236. In other words, the front inner annular glue ring 236 is positioned on the inner portion of the front annular diaphragm 230. A front inner aluminum ring 240 is concentrically attached to a top side of the front inner annular glue ring 236. A front inner annular rubber ring 238 may be concentrically mounted on the front inner aluminum ring 240 at the inner portion of the front annular diaphragm 230.
A front voice coil 242 is attached to a moveable portion of the front annular diaphragm 230. The front voice coil 242 may be attached via glue or other suitable manner to the front annular diaphragm 230. A back plate (or pole piece) 250 including an inner extended portion 252 and an exterior outer portion 254 lies in a plane orthogonal to the central axis 100 and is received by the conduit 208 of the front phasing plug 202. As shown in
A rear annular diaphragm 330 is generally mounted at an input side of the rear base portion 214 of the rear phasing plug 212. A rear outer annular glue ring 332 is positioned concentrically underneath an outer portion of the rear annular diaphragm 330. A rear annular outer aluminum ring 334 is coupled to the rear outer annular glue ring 332 and lies in a plane orthogonal to the central axis 100.
An inner portion of the rear annular diaphragm 330 may be mounted axially between the rear base portion 214 and a rear inner annular glue ring 336. In other words, the rear inner annular glue ring 336 is positioned directly below the inner portion of the rear annular diaphragm 330. A rear inner aluminum ring 340 is concentrically attached to a bottom side of the rear inner annular glue ring 336. A rear inner annular rubber ring 338 may be concentrically mounted directly below the rear inner aluminum ring 340 at the inner portion of the front annular diaphragm 230.
A rear voice coil 342 is attached to a moveable portion of the rear annular diaphragm 330. The rear voice coil 342 may be attached via glue or other suitable manner to the rear annular diaphragm 330. A rear top plate 358 is positioned below the rear annular outer aluminum ring 334. A rear magnet 356 is positioned directly below the rear top plate 358.
A rear back plate (or pole piece) 350 having an inner extended portion 352 and an exterior outer portion 354 lies in a plane orthogonal to the central axis 100 and is received by the annular mounting structure 224 of the rear phasing plug 212. As shown in
The inner extended portion 252 of the front back plate 250, the front magnet 256, and the front top plate 258 define a front axial gap 276 to allow a portion of the front annular diaphragm 230 and the front voice coil 242 to translate axially within the front axial gap 276 in response to the electrodynamic excitation. The front axial gap 276 defines a front compression chamber. In practice, the height of the front compression chamber (i.e., the size of the front axial gap 276 when the front annular diaphragm 230 is not being driven) may be quite small (e.g., approximately 0.5 mm or less) such that the volume of the front compression chamber is also small. While not shown, a plurality of front exits are formed on the output side of the front base portion 204 and are located at the central bore 206. The front exits may be circumferentially spaced relative to the central axis 100.
The front base portion 204 defines a plurality of front (or first) acoustical paths that run from the front compression chamber, through the thickness of the front base portion 204 via entrances and associated channels (not shown), and to the respective front exits. In operation, actuation of the front annular diaphragm 230 by the oscillating front voice coil 242 (that is energized by the audio signal input) generates high sound-pressure acoustical signals within the front compression chamber, and the acoustical signals travel as sound waves through the front base portion 204 along the front acoustical paths in a known manner.
In general, the inner extended portion 352 of the rear back plate 350, the rear magnet 356, and the rear top plate 358 define a rear axial gap 376 to allow a portion of the rear annular diaphragm 330 and the rear voice coil 342 to translate axially within the rear axial gap 376 in response to the electrodynamic excitation. The rear axial gap 376 defines a rear compression chamber and an inner copper ring 378 may be positioned on an outer ledge of the inner extended portion 352 of the back plate 350.
The front annular diaphragm 230 includes a generally V-shaped section 406 (or non-planar section) that is positioned between the inner radial planar section 402 and the outer radial planar section 404. It is recognized that the V-shaped section 406 of the front annular diaphragm 230 may not necessarily be V-shaped and that the section 406 may take on any number of completely non-planar shapes based on a particular implementation. As shown, the front voice coil 242 is attached to the front annular diaphragm 230. An overall length (or clamping dimension) for the inner radial planar section 402 is illustrated as IF and an overall length (or clamping dimension) for the outer radial planar section 404 is illustrated as OF.
Similarly, the rear annular diaphragm 330 includes an inner radial planar section (or first planar section) 422 and an outer radial planar section 424 (or second planar section). As shown, the inner radial planar section 422 is positioned closer to the central axis 100 than the outer radial planar section 424. The rear annular diaphragm 330 includes a generally V-shaped section (or non-planar section) 426 that is positioned between the inner radial planar section 422 and the outer radial planar section 424. It is recognized that the V-shaped section 426 of the rear annular diaphragm 330 may not necessarily be V-shaped and that the section 426 may take on any number of completely non-planar shapes based on a particular implementation. For example, the front annular diaphragm 230 and the rear annular diaphragm 330 does not need to be a strictly V-shaped section 406 and 426 with the inner radial planar sections 402 or 422 and the outer radial planar sections 404 and 424. Instead, a half-roll suspension may be used, etc. An overall length (or clamping dimension or clamping distance) for the inner radial planar section 422 is illustrated as “IR” and an overall length (or clamping dimension or clamping distance) for the outer radial planar section 424 is illustrated as “OR”.
In general, the clamping dimension for the inner radial planar section 402 and the outer radial planar section 404 of the front annular diaphragm 230 corresponds to the distance of the inner and outer radial and planar vibrating portions of the front annular diaphragm 230. Similarly, the clamping dimension for the inner radial planar section 422 and the outer radial planar section 424 of the rear annular diaphragm 330 correspond to the distance of the inner and outer radial and planar vibrating portions of the rear annular diaphragm 330. Such clamping dimensions characterize properties of the frequency response along with the mechanical stiffness on the displacement of the front annular diaphragm 230 and the rear annular diaphragm 330. The front annular diaphragm 230 may be a midrange diaphragm where by the front driver assembly 201 provides an audio output in the mid-range frequency. For example, the clamping dimensions for each of IF and OF for the front annular diaphragm 230 may be larger than the clamping dimensions for each of IR and OR, respectively, for the rear annular diaphragm 330. The rear annular diaphragm 330 may be a high frequency diaphragm where by the rear driver assembly 203 provides an audio output in the high frequency range.
It is recognized that the clamping dimension for each of the inner radial planar section 402 (e.g., IF) and the outer radial planar section 404 (e.g., OF) may or may not be equal to one another. Likewise, it is recognized that the clamping dimension for each of the inner radial planar section 422 (e.g., IF) and the outer radial planar section 424 (e.g., OF) may or may not be equal to one another. Typically, the clamping dimensions for each OF and OR are equal to, or smaller than the clamping dimensions of IF and IR, respectively. The inner clamping dimensions (e.g., IF and IR) may be characterized by higher stiffness if both of such clamping dimensions are equal to one another. Each of the clamping dimensions may influence high frequency resonances (e.g., breakups) and in particular, optimal design configurations may result in different clamping dimensions.
While not shown in
Another factor that may determine the mechanical properties for each of the front annular diaphragm 230 and the rear annular diaphragm 330 is the thickness of material for each diaphragm 230, 330. In general, the thickness of a polymer film for the rear annular diaphragm 330 may be equal to or greater than the thickness of a polymer film for the front annular diaphragm 230 to provide higher mechanical stiffness and correspondingly a higher fundamental resonance to extend the high frequency range of the rear annular diaphragm 330.
Table 1 as illustrated below shows the results of various simulations of the resonance frequency and a “second resonance” frequency as a function of thickness for the diaphragms 230, 330 (e.g., 75 microns and 100 microns) and of the clamping dimension that characterizes the inner radial planar section and the outer radial planar section for any one diaphragm 230, 330. The simulations provided below illustrate two thicknesses (e.g., 75 and 100 microns) and different clamp dimensions (e.g., see clamp size below in Table 1). Accordingly, particular geometries and thicknesses may be selected for the front annular diaphragm 230 and the rear annular diaphragm 330.
Each of the inner and outer clamping dimensions (e.g., IF and OF or IR and OR) for the front annular diaphragm 230 (or the rear annular diaphragm 330) were kept equal. The clamping dimensions were 0.030″, 0.050″, 0.070″, 0.090″, and 0.110″. The “second resonance” frequency is indicative of the onset of breakup modes and correspondingly, increased energy of the diaphragm 230 or 330 vibration. Such a condition was clearly observable in the simulation that overall axial acceleration of the diaphragm 230 or 330 excited by a constant force that is applied to the diaphragm 230 or 330 at the position of the voice coil 242 or 342. In general, breakup modes correspond to multiple high-frequency mechanical resonances of the diaphragm 230 or 330. For example, separate parts of the diaphragm 230 or 330 oscillate with different amplitudes and phases. Thus, the diaphragm 230 or 330 does not vibrate as a single body. The breakups are associated with increased overall displacement, velocity, and acceleration of vibration that increases the sound pressure level. It is especially recognized that the high-frequency diaphragm (or the rear annular diaphragm 330) has a strong peak of the response at 18 kHz to increase high frequency output. Another observation is that the frequency responses are rather smooth because of the high internal damping of the polymer film of the diaphragms 230 or 330.
In general, the data as illustrated in Table 1 and in
In the case of the dual asymmetric compression driver 200 as set forth herein, the mechanical parameters of the diaphragms 230 and 330 are different. For example, the rear driver assembly 203 associated with the rear annular diaphragm 330 (e.g., high-frequency driver) includes a lower moving mass and a higher stiffness than that of the front annular diaphragm. In addition, the volumes of the front and rear compression chambers are different as well. For example, the volume of the rear compression chamber may be smaller than that of the front compression chamber. The compression chamber's volume of the rear (HF) driver (or rear driver assembly 203) may be smaller for two reasons. For example, an area of the rear annular diaphragm 330 may be smaller, and the height of the compression chamber is smaller because the amplitude of the displacement of rear annular diaphragm 330 is much smaller than the displacement of the front annular diaphragm 330. Therefore, the acoustical compliance of the rear compression chamber may be smaller too. This aspect may be a positive factor because larger acoustical compliance acts as a low-pass filter with a lower cut-off frequency. Each diaphragm 230 and 330 is loaded by a corresponding compression chamber (i.e., the front compression chamber and the rear compression chamber, respectively) and the front phasing plug 202 and the rear phasing plug 212, respectively, and by a parallel connection of two acoustical impedances. One of such acoustical impedances is an acoustical impedance of shared acoustical elements such as phasing plugs followed by a horn or a waveguide and by an output acoustical impedance of an adjacent driver. For normal operation, both driver assemblies 201 and 203 may operate through crossovers such as a high-pass (or band pass) filter for the midrange section (e.g., the front driver assembly 201) and a high-pass filter for the high frequency section (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203). The crossovers may be active or passive, or can be a combination of both.
Uin—corresponds to an input voltage from amplifier,
FHF and FMF—correspond to passive filters for the high-frequency and the midrange drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201, respectively),
VC—voice coil,
Bl—force factor,
MHF and MMF—mechanical parts (i.e., the moving assembly) of the high-frequency and the midrange drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201, respectively),
SHF and SMF—effective areas of the high-frequency and the midrange drivers,
CHHF and CHMF—compression chambers,
ZA— is an input acoustical impedance of the acoustical part presenting mutual acoustical load for both drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201, respectively),
PP—correspond to common acoustical elements for the front phasing plug 202 and the rear phasing plug 212, and
WG—corresponds to an internal waveguide that is acoustically connected to an external load such as a waveguide or horn. In general, both single drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201) in the model shown on
Each of the elements in the model as illustrated in
AHF and AMF are matrices derived from the matrix multiplication of the corresponding matrices as shown on
A1 is a matrix derived from the matrix multiplication of matrices PP and WG, and
ZRAD is radiation impedance.
If only the resulting SPL frequency response produced by both drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201) is of interest, then the simplest method is to transform the AHF and AMF matrices into corresponding YHF and YMF matrices that are used in analysis of two-port circuits connected in parallel at the input and output. In general, the input corresponds to a location where electrical inputs of the drivers are connected in parallel. The output corresponds to a location where acoustical signals from both compression chambers merge into mutual centrally-orientated channels. At that point, it is possible to sum the matrices YHF and YMF to obtain matrix YΣ (or YΣ=YHF±YMF), and then turn the matrix YΣ into a new transfer matrix AΣ. Such a matrix can be cascaded with an acoustical A1 matrix (by multiplication) and then the overall complex output sound pressure can be expressed as:
With this approach, a mutual influence of the drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 and the front driver assembly 201) is taken into account. Acoustical matrix parameters can then be modeled by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or via transmission line approach as set forth in “Horn Modeling with Conical and Cylindrical Transmission Line Elements”, Dan Mapes-Riordan, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 41, No. 6, 1993 June, pp. 471-484.
If an individual SPL response of one of the drivers (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203 or the front driver assembly 201) has to be modeled, then the approach may be different. It is based on the assumption that the other driver is short-circuited at the electrical input because it is connected to the source of voltage with zero output impedance. For example, if it is desirable to model the sound pressure response of the high-frequency driver (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203), it is possible to consider that the high frequency driver is loaded by the parallel connection of ZA and the output acoustical impedance of the midrange driver ZMout (or the front driver assembly 201). Since the input of the matrix being presented to the midrange driver is connected to the source of voltage with a zero output impedance, the output impedance of the midrange driver may be modeled as:
where inv[AMF12] and inv[AMF22] are corresponding matrix elements of the inverted matrix AMF.
Denoting the parallel connection of the acoustical impedances ZMout and ZA as ZMA, the sound pressure at an exit of the compression chamber of the high-frequency driver PA (e.g., the rear driver assembly 203) can be calculated as:
The sound pressure PA is used as a source for the acoustical matrix A1:
The response of the midrange driver (or the front driver assembly 201) can be calculated correspondingly assuming the high-frequency driver (or the rear driver assembly 203) is short-circuited.
Initial information for effective areas of the diaphragms 230 or 330 can be obtained from a Klippel scanner or by using the method as set forth in, “Identification of Compression Driver Parameters Based on a Concept of the Diaphragm's Frequency-Dependent Area”, A. Voishvillo as presented at 137th AES Convention, Los Angeles, Oct. 11, 2014, preprint 9165.
The initial information for the effective areas of the diaphragms 230 or 330 along with other electromechanical and acoustical parameters of the midrange and high-frequency drivers (or front driver assembly 201 and the rear driver assembly 203) was used in modeling and the development of the dual asymmetric driver 200 based on, for example, 2-inch diameter voice coils and a 1-inch exit.
In the development process, the modeling was carried out first for the simple case of lumped parameters and where there was no mutual influence of midrange and high-frequency drivers 201, 203 on each other. Initial simplification also included plane wave tube loading. At the next stage, the mutual influence of the drivers 201, 203 was taken into account. Next, the individual responses of both drivers 201 and 203 with frequency-dependent areas of the diaphragms 230, 330 were taken into account, and then the mutual influence of drivers 201, 203 with frequency-dependent areas of the diaphragms 230, 330 areas were taken into account as well. The next stage of the development process included optimization of SPL frequency responses and the alignment of time delays and phase responses between mid-frequency and high-frequency channels of the drivers 201, 203.
The mid-range driver 201 and the high-frequency driver 203 are connected via crossovers in that the high-frequency driver 203 includes a high-pass filter of the third order, and the mid-range driver 201 includes an all-pass circuit of the second order tuned that may be tuned to, for example, 10 kHz. The midrange driver 201 may not include a low-pass filter to maximize the high frequency output, which therefore adds a corresponding lower-SPL output at a high frequency that aids in boosting the overall high-frequency output of the driver 200.
The mutual internal acoustical interaction between the mid-frequency driver 201 and high-frequency driver 203 change their corresponding SPL responses (i.e., when compared to the individual radiation of each one without the influence of the counterpart) and attenuates the SPL at certain frequencies, but nevertheless, the overall level of the SPL frequency response of this dual asymmetric compression driver 200 maybe superior to compression drivers based on traditional design.
In general, the dual asymmetric compression driver 200 as disclosed herein, provides, but not limited to, two diaphragms that are mechanically “tuned” to different frequency ranges. Such a two-way configuration makes it possible to optimize performance for each diaphragm for a corresponding frequency range. Similar shape annular flexural diaphragms, similar voice coils and similar motors may be utilized however; the clamping dimensions of the diaphragms may be different from one another thereby providing for two different moving masses and suspension compliances. Correspondingly, the moving assemblies have resonance frequencies that are different by, for example, approximately two octaves. Smaller moving mass and suspension compliance of the high-frequency diaphragm assembly (or the rear driver assembly 203) may result in a higher fundamental frequency and a second resonance frequency that provide an extension of the frequency range.
The high-frequency diaphragm (e.g., the rear annular diaphragm 330) may utilize less maximum displacement than the mid-frequency diaphragm (e.g., the front annular diaphragm 230), therefore the height of the high-frequency compression chamber (i.e., the rear compression chamber) is approximately half as high compared to the midrange compression chamber (i.e., the front compression chamber). This aspect provides a smaller volume of the high-frequency compression chamber and lower acoustical compliance of the high-frequency chamber that also aids to extend the high-frequency range.
The mutual internal acoustical interaction between the high-frequency and the mid-frequency drivers changes their corresponding SPL responses (i.e., when compared to the individual radiation of each one without influence of the counterpart) and attenuates the SPL at certain frequencies, but nevertheless, the overall SPL frequency response of the dual asymmetric compression driver may be more advantageous than conventional compression drivers.
While embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
This application is the U.S. national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/058138 filed on Oct. 21, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/245,712 filed Oct. 23, 2015, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/058138 | 10/21/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/070481 | 4/27/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5526456 | Heinz | Jun 1996 | A |
8280091 | Voishvillo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
9008343 | Dimitrov | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20020057819 | Czerwinski et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20110085692 | Voishvillo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Lampton, “Transmission Matrices in Electroacoustics”, Acustica, vol. 39, No. 4, 1978, pp. 239-251. |
Dodd et al., “New Methodology for the Acoustic Design of Compression Driver Phase Plugs with Concentric Annular Channels”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 2009, pp. 771-787. |
Smith, “An Investigation of the Air Chamber of Horn Type Loudspeakers”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 25, No. 2, Mar. 1953, pp. 305-312. |
Voishvillo, “Identification of compression driver parameters based on a concept of the diaphragm's frequency-dependent area”, 137th AES Convention, Los Angeles, CA, Oct. 9-12, 2014, 10 pages. |
Voishvillo, “Simulation of Horn Drive Response by Combination of Matrix Analysis and FEA”, 129th AES Convention, San Francisco, CA, Nov. 4-7, 2010, 10 pages. |
Mapes-Riordan, “Horn Modeling with Conical and Cylindrical Transmission-Line Elements”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 41, No. 6, Jun. 1993, pp. 471-484. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180255399 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62245712 | Oct 2015 | US |