1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to shutters and in particular to shutters of the roller type having improved resistance to storms and break-ins. Furthermore, this invention relates to a shutter having improved retraction capability.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventional roller shutters are designed to provide security from break-ins or protection from storms. The shutters must maintain appropriate structural integrity while extended in order to provide security and protection, but the design of a roller shutter must also allow a user to conveniently extend or retract the shutter on demand. Even though conventional roller shutters may need to be extended and retracted frequently or unexpectedly, such shutters have been prone to jam and/or snag. In addition, various factors influence the strength of a shutter and its ability to withstand forces of nature and attempts by intruders to break in through the aperture enclosed by the shutter. The material choice for fabrication of the shutter is one such factor, as is the type of articulation between shutter slats. In addition, a shutter may be strengthened by increasing surface area contact of each shutter slat with a guard, typically a track that runs the full length of the building aperture covered by the shutter. Unfortunately, this surface area is limited by the requirement that the slats of a roller shutter must be capable of conforming to a roll, for convenient storage.
One such conventional roller shutter employs a single c-shaped boss located inside the hollow body of the shutter, into which a retaining screw may be inserted. The retaining screw then holds the slat in a fixed position within the guard, allowing the roller shutter to slide up and down the guard during retraction and extension, respectively, while purportedly preventing the roller shutter from undesirably disengaging from the guards. This shutter differs from the present invention because it bears only a single boss and does not employ a retention plate.
One result of this configuration is that the individual shutter slats easily jam during extension and retraction of the shutter. The single retention screw provided in each shutter slat allows the slat to wiggle undesirably within the guard, particularly when the articulation between slats is loose or when there is otherwise play between slats.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,631,749 to Zabala teaches a roller shutter in which each slat has one or more transverse ribs for support, as well as two sets of internal brackets running the length of the slat, in which retainers, or retaining screws, are disposed. The retainers of each slat slide along the guard assembly as the roller shutter is extended and retracted, and provide support to the roller shutter by restricting the motion of the slats. The '749 patent is different from the present invention because it requires support ribs that are separate and distinct from the brackets into which the retainers are received. Furthermore, the '749 patent does not teach or employ a retention plate to maximize surface area contact between the shutter slat and the guard.
A first object of the invention is to improve the stability of the roller shutter while it is in an extended position, maximizing the protection provided by the roller shutter while minimizing manufacturing complexity.
A second object of the invention is to improve the smoothness with which the roller shutter may be extended and retracted.
A third object of the invention is to satisfy the above listed objects of the invention without sacrificing the ability of the roller shutter to be rolled up compactly for storage.
These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
According to the present invention, increased stability as well as smooth extension and retraction of the roller shutter may be achieved without the aforementioned undesirable features of prior art by increasing the surface contact between the shutter slat and the guide. The increase in surface contact is accomplished by use of a dual-boss shutter slat in combination with a retention plate, wherein the retention plate is secured to each shutter slat by means of identically sized screws inserted into each of the two bosses in the shutter slat. The configuration of the shutter slats and the retention plate contemplated by the present invention does not impede the roller shutter from retracting into a compact roll.
There is provided a shutter for a building aperture comprising a plurality of such shutter slats each having an upper and lower edge, a first face and a second face, and a first end and a second end, which are articulated to form a roller shutter having a first face and a second face, and a first end and a second end. The shutter further comprises first and second guides, which are locatable at the first and second ends of the roller shutter.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, each boss provides a c-shaped receptacle for a retention screw. Each boss, provided inside the generally hollow interior of a shutter slat, runs from the first end to the second end of the shutter slat. Other than the single aperture provided in the c-shape, the boss is continuous in internal profile.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, the two bosses project into the generally hollow interior of the slat from the interior surfaces corresponding to the upper and lower edges.
In a second embodiment of the present invention, each boss spans the interior distance of the generally hollow slat, from the first face to the second face, thereby providing added stability without the need for a separate support rib. The use of a pair of identically sized, gap-spanning bosses allows desirable reduction in manufacturing complexity in the present invention over the prior art.
According to another aspect of the invention, a retention plate is used in combination with the dual-boss shutter slat. In one embodiment, the retention plate has holes corresponding in size and alignment to the two bosses of the shutter slat. In this embodiment, the dimensions of the retention plate must not exceed those of the profile of the shutter slat, to ensure that the roller shutter may be rolled up compactly.
In another embodiment, the retention plate has elongated holes corresponding in alignment to the two bosses of the slat, which allow incidental movement of the plate upon retraction of the shutter. In this embodiment, the retention plate may be wider than the thickness of the shutter slat, allowing increased surface area contact between the shutter slat and the guide without detriment to the compactness of the retracted shutter.
Embodiments of the invention will now be explained in further detail by way of example only with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
a is an elevation of a retention plate for use with a shutter slat;
b is a variation of the retention plate shown in
The shutter slat 12 shown in
An advantage of the second embodiment of the present invention over other dual-screw configurations is that in spanning the interior of the slat, bosses 3 and 3′ of the second embodiment of the present invention provide what the prior art device required an additional support member to accomplish. In addition, by reinforcing the interior-spanning boss with the retention screw, the resulting combination is stronger and more secure than a single layer of extruded metal found in the support member of the prior art.
It is also to be understood that a shutter slat could be made employing a boss of the first embodiment and a boss of the second embodiment, and that more than two bosses could be employed in any combination of the first and second embodiments described herein in keeping with the present invention.
As shown in
The benefit of the retention plate 6 is that a greater surface area is provided for contact with internal rib 16, resulting in smoother motion of the roller shutter 17 up and down the guides 13 and 14 with less jamming. An additional benefit of the retention plate 6 is that if the exertion of pressure on the first face 9 or second face 8 of the roller shutter 17 deflects the roller shutter 17 in one direction or another, the retention plate 6 may more firmly engage the guides 13 and 14 thereby distributing the force over the full face of the retention plate 6 instead of merely the retention screws 5 and 5′. The retention screws 5 and 5′ will therefore be less likely to be damaged and the roller shutter itself will be more resistant to damage.
An elevation of a retention plate 6 is shown in
b depicts an elevation of a second embodiment of retention plate 6. In a second embodiment, retention plate 6 has apertures 7 and 7′ which are oblong or laterally elongated. The elongated apertures 7 and 7′ shown in
Many further modifications in addition to those described above may be made to the structures and techniques described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting upon the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
638314 | Blades | Dec 1899 | A |
845526 | Collins | Feb 1907 | A |
876593 | Rush | Jan 1908 | A |
1014315 | McCloud | Jan 1912 | A |
1352656 | Cahill | Sep 1920 | A |
1579839 | Raper | Apr 1926 | A |
1776119 | Johnson | Sep 1930 | A |
1892570 | Ginder | Dec 1932 | A |
1918415 | Miller | Jul 1933 | A |
2350287 | Michelman | May 1944 | A |
2545400 | White | Mar 1951 | A |
2812813 | Zarnowski | Nov 1957 | A |
2858883 | Rapin | Nov 1958 | A |
3292685 | Clark | Dec 1966 | A |
3431964 | Rogers | Mar 1969 | A |
3489200 | Recchione | Jan 1970 | A |
3670797 | Sassano | Jun 1972 | A |
4037639 | Jones | Jul 1977 | A |
4294302 | Ricke, Sr. | Oct 1981 | A |
4332287 | Stolpe | Jun 1982 | A |
4343340 | Paule | Aug 1982 | A |
4345635 | Solomon | Aug 1982 | A |
4379479 | Whiting | Apr 1983 | A |
4386645 | Dever et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4519434 | Forquer | May 1985 | A |
4611848 | Romano | Sep 1986 | A |
4628982 | Labelle | Dec 1986 | A |
4690193 | Morrison et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718472 | Hormann | Jan 1988 | A |
4723588 | Ruppel | Feb 1988 | A |
4738296 | Hatch | Apr 1988 | A |
4795206 | Adams | Jan 1989 | A |
4807687 | Finch et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4929862 | Hamilton et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930563 | Finch et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5070925 | Paule | Dec 1991 | A |
5154468 | Teigen et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165746 | Teigen | Nov 1992 | A |
5204147 | Schneider | Apr 1993 | A |
5209281 | Kraeutler | May 1993 | A |
5253694 | Bernardo | Oct 1993 | A |
5265663 | Munekata et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5343924 | Hoffman | Sep 1994 | A |
5365990 | Ueda | Nov 1994 | A |
5372175 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377738 | Cooper | Jan 1995 | A |
5426893 | Hoffman | Jun 1995 | A |
5469905 | McKinney et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482104 | Lichy | Jan 1996 | A |
5575322 | Miller | Nov 1996 | A |
5586592 | McGregor | Dec 1996 | A |
5601130 | Werner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611383 | Hoffman | Mar 1997 | A |
5613539 | Kraler | Mar 1997 | A |
5657805 | Magro | Aug 1997 | A |
5682937 | Decrane et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5839493 | Quasius | Nov 1998 | A |
5850862 | Miller | Dec 1998 | A |
5996669 | Miller | Dec 1999 | A |
6085822 | Miller | Jul 2000 | A |
6095225 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6129132 | Denoual et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6422289 | Miller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6631749 | Zabata | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20040188037 | Schlater et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050205221 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |