This invention relates to the frame of an automotive vehicle and, more particularly, to a body side rail configuration to improve strength in the roof frame members particularly for vehicles not having an intermediate B-pillar construction.
The frame of an automotive vehicle supports an operator's compartment and includes a roof supported by generally vertical members commonly referred to as pillars. For some vehicles, the roof is normally supported by front and rear pillars, also known as the “A” and “B” pillars. Other vehicle configurations can include front and rear pillars with a support pillar between the front and rear pillars, in which case the front and rear pillars would be referred to as the “A” and “C” pillars and the intermediate pillar would be the “B” pillar. The frame of the vehicle is required to withstand certain forces relating to roof strength of the vehicle. Those roof strength standards help determine the configuration of the vehicle frame. Automotive vehicles are often designed with an operator's compartment that includes a rear passenger seat and a set of rear doors that can be hinged on the rear pillars, instead of the intermediate B-pillar, to provide an open span between the front and rear pillars when the front and rear doors are opened.
These different frame configurations have a direct impact on the design of the frame components of the automobile. The longer the unsupported open span, such as can be found on some pick-up trucks where the rear door hinges on the rear “B” pillar, the greater the challenge to support the load that must be transferred into the frame components to meet roof strength requirements. The longer unsupported roof spans also, consequentially, will increase the moment applied to the base of the rear pillar of the operator's cab in vehicles, such as pick-up trucks.
The known design strategy for the frame components forming the body side construction of an automotive vehicle is to manufacture these components through stamping and bending of sheet metal to form the individual frame components with a generally uniform cross-section that is consistent with these known manufacturing processes. The size and shape of the cross-sectional configuration of the respective individual component is dictated by the strength required at the highest load point asserted on that individual component. Efforts have been made over the years to modify the shape of the cross-section and the thickness of the sheet metal in attempts to maintain the requisite strength parameters while reducing the weight of the respective frame components, and thus the cost of production thereof. Nevertheless, maintaining the generally uniform size and shape of the individual frame component results in a part or a component that weighs more then required to carry the load.
Thus, it would be desirable to provide a body side rail construction for automobiles that can carry the required load encountered by the body side rail without substantially increasing the weight of the body side rail.
It is an object of this invention to overcome the aforementioned disadvantages of the known prior art by providing a body side rail construction for automotive vehicles that enhanced by the addition of a C-shaped channel to the conventional formed side rail member.
It is another object of this invention to provide a body side rail construction for automobiles that can carry the load imposed thereon along without the support of an intermediate B-pillar.
It is a feature of this invention that the body side rail member can be formed with a C-channel welded to the side of the conventional formed body side rail to form a dual cell side rail member.
It is an advantage of this invention that the dual cell body side rail construction increases the strength of the body side rail without adding substantial weight to the body side rail member.
It is another advantage of this invention that the C-channel can be configured to carry the brackets needed to mount the front header, roof bow and rear header members.
It is still another advantage of this invention that the shipping package for the body side rails is not substantially increased.
It is still another feature of this invention that an integral space frame configuration is not required to increase the strength of the body side rail members.
It is still another advantage of this invention that the open section member can be welded to the closed section member in a number of different configurations.
It is yet another advantage of this invention that the body side rail can be used to carry the requite load between front and rear pillars without requiring an intermediate pillar structure.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a dual cell body side rail for an automotive vehicle that is durable in construction, inexpensive of manufacture, carefree of maintenance, facile in assemblage, and simple and effective in use.
These and other objects, features and advantages are accomplished according to the instant invention by providing a body side rail construction for an automotive vehicle that is formed in a dual cell configuration. A reversed C-shaped channel is welded to the closed section of the conventional roof side rail member to enable the body side rail member to be a smaller section that will be less susceptible to buckling as the body side rail member transfers load to the front and rear corner pillars. The c-shaped cross-sectional configuration presents considerable advantages for manufacturing because it can be shaped to provide the attaching brackets and horns for mounting the front header, roof bow, and rear header members to the body side rail member without the addition of individual end items to serve this function. From a shipping density standpoint this design gives maximum structure while maintaining good rack density that enables relatively straight parts to be nested together while still providing the increased section strength required for enhanced roof performance.
The advantages of this invention will become apparent upon consideration of the following detailed disclosure of the invention, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to the drawings, a body side frame construction for an automotive vehicle, such as an operator's cab of a pick-up truck, can be seen. Any right or left references are used as a matter of convenience and are determined by standing at the rear of the vehicle and facing forward into the normal direction of forward travel. The body side frame construction 10 includes a front pillar 12, a rear corner pillar 13 and a roof rail structure 15 extending between the front and rear pillars 12, 13. The frame 10 of the operator's cab is formed with a generally vertical front (or “A”) pillar 12 extending between the floor member 14 and the roof structure 15. The rear pillar 13 completes the generally rectangular configuration of the body side frame construction 10 and is intended to mount by hinges (not shown) both front and rear doors (not shown). The front door will normally hinge on the front “A” pillar 12, while the rear “B” pillar can support the hinges for the rear door. The roof structure 15 extends from the right side of the vehicle to the left side over top of the operator's cab, spanning between the transversely spaced front and rear corner pillars 12, 13. The left and right sides of the vehicle are substantially identical mirror images of one another.
Each of the rear corner pillars 13, though only one is depicted in the drawings, is formed in a dual cell configuration as is described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/429,096, filed on May 5, 2006, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Preferably the roof structure 15 will engage the rear corner pillar 13 in a manner to provide a smooth and integral transition from the rear pillar 13 into the roof side rails 16. The roof side rails 16 extend forwardly and eventually forwardly and downwardly to create the front “A” pillar 12.
An integral body side rail and cross member configuration can be seen in
In the embodiment depicted in
One skilled in the art can see that the formation of the body side frame components by tubular members allows the roof structure to be integrally formed with the roof side rail 16 and the front pillar 12 without sacrificing strength. The adjacent tubular rail outer tube 17 and the forward portion 20 of the roof header rail 19 form a strong front pillar 12 with an internal reinforcement web 18 created by the adjacent walls of the tubular members increasing the strength of the front pillar section. Furthermore, the rail outer tube 17 can be a two inch tubular member that extends substantially uniformly from the lower end of the front pillar 12 to the rear pillar 13. As such, the rail outer tube can be roll-formed. This size of tubular member can meet the minimum strength requirements of the roof side rail 16, while the addition of the other tubular members 19, 21 and 25, bolster the strength of the rail outer tube 17 to meet the maximum strength requirements.
One problem associated with the integral body side rail and cross member configuration is the shipping package required to transport these integral frame members from the place of manufacture thereof to the plant where the assembly of the vehicle will occur. The integral roof frame 10 requires a large shipping package, which is largely composed of air, to accommodate the longitudinal length of the body side rail members 16 and the transverse width of the cross frame members, such as the roof front header 21. An alternative body side rail construction 30 is shown in
The dual cell body side rail 30 includes a first closed section, conventional body side rail 32, which can be a rolled, formed and welded member, or formed through a hydroforming process, coupled with a second open section, preferably C-shaped channel, member 35 welded to the side of the conventional body side rail 32 to form the dual cell configuration. The C-shaped channel member 35 is preferably formed with a side wall 36 interconnecting top and bottom walls. The welding of the C-shaped channel member 35 to the first closed section member 32 preferably places the inside wall 33 of the first body side rail member 32 as an internal web for the dual cell configuration 30 with the side wall 36 of the C-shaped channel member 35 being spaced from the inner wall 33.
In the weld pattern shown in
An alternative configuration for the C-channel 35 is depicted in
As is represented in
Thus, from a shipping density standpoint, the design of this dual cell body side rail configuration 30 gives maximum structure to resist buckling under load to transfer the load to the front and rear pillar structures, while maintaining good rack density. The dual cell body side rail configuration 30 enables relatively straight frame components, such as the roof side rail members, the front and rear header members and the roof cross bows, to be nested to each other for shipping purposes while still providing a structural design to attain the increased section strength required for enhanced roof performance.
One skilled in the art will recognize that changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made by those skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within the principles and scope of the invention. The foregoing description illustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however, concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4826238 | Misono et al. | May 1989 | A |
4875733 | Chado et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4986597 | Clausen | Jan 1991 | A |
5078439 | Terada et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5102186 | Yoshii et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5246263 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246264 | Yoshii | Sep 1993 | A |
5269585 | Klages et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5318338 | Ikeda | Jun 1994 | A |
5388885 | Warren | Feb 1995 | A |
5443297 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5549352 | Janotik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560672 | Lim et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609385 | Daniel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5720510 | Daniel et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725271 | Patel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5829824 | Yamamuro et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836641 | Sugamoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839776 | Clausen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860694 | Seefried et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6042176 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073992 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102472 | Wallstrom | Aug 2000 | A |
6123378 | Teply et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6315353 | Brodt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322134 | Yang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325450 | Sakyo et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6397553 | Horikawa et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428064 | Frederick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6474726 | Hanakawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6554350 | Takahara | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6578909 | Reed et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595579 | Freitag et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6623067 | Gabbianelli et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6692065 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7036874 | Stojkovic et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7264302 | Nagashima | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273247 | Grueneklee et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7364226 | McNulty et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7445269 | Yustick et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467821 | Wolkersdorfer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472948 | Yatabe et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7543882 | Day et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543884 | Reed et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020033618 | Kwon | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20080052908 | Reed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090212602 | Reed et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100026053 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |