The present invention relates to a high pressure delivery system for delivering a medicament. More particularly, the present invention relates to a high pressure drug delivery system that diverts high pressures away from the drug storing chamber to prevent medication leakage and inaccurate doses.
In certain circumstances, it is desirable to inject medication directly into human tissue. Typically, syringes are used to inject medicaments into tissue areas, such as the intramuscular tissue layer, the subcutaneous tissue layer, and the intradermal tissue layer. Each of these tissue layers has specific characteristics that affect the amount of fluid pressure needed to inject a fluid into the targeted tissue layer. When injecting fluids into each of these tissue layers, the user must exert enough force on the injection device to overcome different amounts of backpressure associated with the particular tissue layer. In general, practitioners and self-injectors, such as diabetics, are familiar with the force necessary to inject fluids into the subcutaneous layer. Injections into the subcutaneous and intramuscular tissue layers can cause discomfort to the patient or self-injector because of the characteristics of the tissue, needle length and needle diameter or gauge. It is desirable to employ shorter, smaller gauge needles to achieve delivery into the intradermal tissue layer.
It is noted that when the needle lengths are shortened and needle diameters are made smaller, the fluid dynamics of the injection device changes. Additionally, the fluid dynamics between the injection device and the targeted tissue layer also change because the shorter needle length injects the fluid into a different tissue layer, such as the intradermal layer. Since the tissue density between the intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intradermal tissue layers varies, the ease with which fluid may be injected into each type of tissue layer varies. The variation in tissue density causes changes in the backpressure exerted by the tissue against the fluid when it is injected. For instance, the backpressure associated with the intradermal tissue layer is greater than the backpressure associated with the subcutaneous tissue layer, thereby requiring a higher pressure and a greater force to accomplish the injection.
Currently, several pen injection systems are commercially available for subcutaneous substance delivery of medication. These pen injection systems typically use 29 to 31 gauge needles having lengths of between 5 mm and 12.7 mm, and are used to deliver the contents of a medicament cartridge, such as insulin, to the subcutaneous tissue layers of a patient rapidly and conveniently. The medicament cartridges are generally of a standard volume and size (including a fixed cross sectional area). The pressure of delivery is the quotient of the actuation force exerted by a user and the cross sectional area of the cartridge. Since the cross-sectional area of the cartridge is fixed, higher delivery pressures require higher actuation forces by the user.
A “microneedle” pen system has been developed to facilitate subcutaneous substance delivery. Such “microneedle” drug delivery systems may include shorter needles, typically less than or equal to 3 mm, with smaller diameters, in the range of 30 to 34 gauge or thinner. Such needle length and gauge size combinations are desirable to provide for sharp, yet short, point geometries that can more accurately target substance delivery to only certain selected tissue, such as the deep intradermal or shallow subcutaneous tissue layers, thereby permitting controlled fluid delivery. Current typical pen injection systems used for subcutaneous delivery are not believed optimal for use by the general population of self-injectors for delivery into the intradermal layer because of, inter alia, the high backpressures associated with injecting fluid into the intradermal layers of the skin using microneedles.
To achieve effective medication delivery to the targeted tissue layer in light of higher backpressures, it is desirable to control two factors: the depth accuracy of the injection and the rate of the injection. This is of particular interest in connection with intradermal injections because the backpressures are relatively high, but similar analysis can be applied when injecting into the intramuscular or the subcutaneous tissue layers. The delivery of medicament within the narrow depth range of the intradermal tissue layer should first be assured, and maintained during injection. Once the depth accuracy is obtained, the rate of injection should be controlled to minimize or eliminate leakage of the medicament into other tissue layers or back out through the skin. Additional details of intradermal drug delivery and microneedles have been previously described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,494,865, issued on Dec. 17, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,569,143, issued on May 27, 2003, PCT Publication No. WO2005025641, published Mar. 24, 2005, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0065472, published on Mar. 24, 2005, all of which are assigned to Becton, Dickinson and Company, and the entire content of each such patent and application being incorporated herein by reference.
The intradermal tissue layer of the skin is considerably denser than the subcutaneous tissue region. The density of the intradermal tissue layer on a particular patient is, in part, a function of their collagen make-up, which is affected by the patient's age, and the location of the injection site on the patient's body. This increased density of the intradermal tissue layer can create a greater backpressure resistance on the injection device than the resistance created when injecting into the subcutaneous tissue region. To overcome the increased backpressure resistance when injecting into the intradermal tissue layer with a conventional drug delivery pen, the user or patient would need to exert greater actuation force (which could be substantial) on the injector device actuator or employ some sort of powered injector device. In these applications, the injector device must be designed to withstand the greater backpressure from the intradermal injection site as well as the additional force exerted by the user or patient. Further, the increased actuation force required to actuate the injector device may result in the fluid “jetting” past the desired tissue depth due to the increased fluid pressure.
Conventional drug delivery pens may require that the user keep the needle seated in the skin for a period of up to about 10 seconds, after the injection has been completed, to allow for the “axial compliance” of the pen mechanism (or lead screw) and the cartridge back-end stopper to equilibrate to minimize “drool” from the needle tip upon withdrawal. Such time periods may need to be increased to accommodate any additional axial compliance resulting from higher backpressures, and such increased time periods can also decrease the required force to make the injection.
As advances in understanding the delivery of drug proceeds, the use of intradermal delivery systems is expected to increase. Use of a “standard” length needle to deliver a drug substance intradermally has its shortcomings, as noted above. It is not possible to use a delivery device having a needle length suited for intradermal injection to aspirate a syringe with drug substance from a multi-use vial. Thus, there are shortcomings in the prior art that prevent administering an intradermal injection using a “standard” length needle and a multi-use vial. It would be advantageous to have a drug delivery device capable of accessing substances stored in multi-dose vials and delivering such substances into the intradermal region of the skin without encountering the shortcomings described above.
Existing drug delivery pens offer several advantages over syringe based systems for delivering insulin subcutaneously. Reusable drug delivery pens hold 20 or more doses without requiring the drug cartridge to be refilled. Dose setting is achieved simply with the use of a dial. However, those drug delivery pens are designed for low pressure subcutaneous injections. Intradermal injection of insulin and other medications provides faster uptake of the drug, thereby leading to improved therapy. Existing drug delivery pens have several limitations regarding intradermal drug delivery. First, the mechanical advantage provided by the pen is minimal and requires the user to supply upwards of 20 lbs of force to generate sufficient pressure. Secondly, the pen components are often damaged by this high force, resulting in leaking and inaccuracy at the high pressures. Additionally, the size of the drug delivery pen required to obtain the high pressures associated with intradermal drug delivery would be too large for a user to conveniently carry.
There are no existing intradermal pen-like devices that take advantage of pen-like, dial-a-dose accuracy and ease of use with syringe like (small diameter) high pressure performance. Existing drug delivery pens require a large force to inject medication into the intradermal layer, thereby making the intradermal medication injection difficult. Furthermore, the drug delivery pen components are often damaged due to the high pressures, thereby resulting in medication leakage and dose inaccuracy.
Therefore, a need exists to provide a system and method for enabling users or patients to perform high pressure delivery of compounds, such as therapeutic drugs, vaccines, and diagnostic materials, at a controlled rate without requiring the exertion of an overly large force or resulting in an unwieldy device.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a high pressure drug delivery system is provided that separates the dose setting mechanisms from the high pressure associated with drug delivery so that the stress caused by the high pressure does not affect the dose setting.
The accuracy of a pen's screw dose setting is combined with the hydraulic advantage of a small bore syringe to deliver medicaments in high pressure applications, such as an intradermal area. Valving between the cartridge and the syringe operates like a plunger-type reciprocating device with two check valves that allow flow into the syringe during dose setting and only allows flow through the microneedle during injection. The check valve allows a user to inject the dose from the syringe back into the cartridge when a user accidentally overdoses into the syringe.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a high pressure drug delivery system is provided that uses a gear pump assembly to accomplish the high pressure drug delivery.
Other objects, advantages, and salient features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses exemplary embodiments of the invention.
The above benefits and other advantages of the various embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention and from the accompanying figures, in which:
Throughout the drawings, like reference numbers will be understood to refer to like parts, components and structures.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes a high pressure drug delivery system having a cartridge, which is preferably a typical 3 ml cartridge, coupled to a preferably disposable syringe that accommodates the high pressure generated from a small diameter syringe. The cartridge and syringe are coupled by a valving system that allows medicament to flow from the cartridge to the syringe and then prevents backflow during delivery of the medicament. The valving system may include 3-way valves, stopcock valves, or check valves, or any other suitable valve. The valving system prevents contamination of the stored medicament, which is a greater concern due to the use of a dual chamber system. An intradermal microneedle pen needle may be attached to the syringe and replaced with each use, thereby providing an interchangeable needle. The device may have a switch to allow the user to correct a dose without wasting the dose in the event that the dose is overdrawn.
To operate the high pressure drug delivery system, a user installs a cartridge or vial if it is a reusable product. Alternatively, the high pressure drug delivery system may be preconnected and is completely disposable. The user then sets or determines a dose, such as by dialing, in a manner similar to existing drug delivery pens. Depending on the valving system used, the user may need to set the proper valve position. The user injects the dose into the syringe located adjacent the pen cartridge or vial. As the dose enters the syringe, the plunger is pushed up. Alternatively, a single plunger may draw the dose into the syringe. A valving system allows flow from the cartridge or vial into the injection chamber of the syringe but does not allow backflow unless the user chooses to manually override the valve to allow backflow to reset or correct the dose. The user then connects any fluid connection path, such as microneedle, if it is not already connected. The fluid connection path, i.e., the needle, is then primed. The fluid connection path is then inserted into the area where the drug is to be delivered, such as the microneedle into an intradermal area, and the user depresses the syringe plunger to inject the dose.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the high pressure drug delivery system uses a microneedle and existing syringe or syringe components to generate the high pressure (approximately 200 psi) needed for intradermal delivery. The dose setting mechanism it separated from the high pressure so that the stress caused by the high pressure does not affect the dose setting. Existing dose setting/resetting mechanisms that are proven accurate, as well as commercially available cartridges (e.g., 3 ml cartridges), may be used to provide accurate doses for both small and large doses. Furthermore, the high pressure drug delivery system according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention may use conventional and completely disposable 3 ml cartridges with multiple microneedle pen needles, and may have a reusable dose setting (pen-like) and a valving system with a disposable syringe (using multiple microneedle pen needles) allowing for user installation of 3 ml cartridges. By using disposable parts, the high pressure drug delivery system is efficient and inexpensive.
An automatic priming feature allows the user to set the dose as in existing drug delivery pens, but also includes in the dose a priming dose. When the dose (dose plus priming dose) is transferred to the syringe, which is a limiting syringe that only allows the volume for the exact dose, the prime dose has nowhere to go but through a check valve and out through the fluid connection path, such as a needle, thereby automatically priming the high pressure drug delivery system.
To use the high pressure drug delivery system 100 of
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
To use the high pressure drug delivery system 300 of
As described above, the dose setting mechanism may set both the dose and the prime, thereby providing a self-priming system. When the dose is set, the second chamber 321 (the syringe) is set to only accept the dose and not the prime. The syringe may include a limiter that allows the syringe to only accept the dose amount. When the user pushes both the dose and the prime into the syringe injection chamber, the prime has nowhere to go but out through the second check valve 335 and through the fluid connection path 341, thereby priming the high pressure delivery system. Alternatively, the dose may be set on the syringe side to limit the stroke of the syringe.
As shown in
As shown in
In another exemplary embodiment of the high pressure drug delivery system 500 using vial-based delivery as shown in
When the check valve is set to the “set dose” mode, the check valve prevents flow into the syringe. The check valve that is open to air then cracks open under the vacuum, thereby drawing air into the syringe through the check valve. The drawn in air is then injected through the manual switch check valve into the vial, thereby pressurizing the vial with that “dose of air.” When the manual switch check valve is switched to the “inject” mode, the syringe may be reloaded with the dose, which is now only insulin. Switching the valve to the “inject” mode reverses the check valve orientation, i.e., the direction of flow. Both check valves now only allow flow out of the syringe through the fluid connection path 541 (microneedle) so that the drug delivery may be made.
As shown in
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention shown in
A dose is dialed with the dose screw 555 at the syringe 551 as shown in
In another exemplary embodiment of the high pressure drug delivery device 600 shown in
The gear pump assembly 521 allows the teeth 535 and 536 to be sized such that each drug volume space or pocket 537 and 538, which is the space between the teeth 535 and 536, respectively, may be ¼ or ½ unit volumes, or any other volume appropriate for metering and dose accuracy, as shown in
The vial-based delivery device allows a larger 10 ml vial to be used instead of the smaller 3 ml cartridge, thereby increasing the available amount of doses and reducing the need for so many smaller cartridges. By using a gear pump assembly 521, the ability to provide high pressure is provided while also accurately metering doses. The gear pump assembly 521 may also provide variable rate control in connection with a consistent input, such as a torsion spring, driving the dose. Priming may be incorporated into the gear tooth layout by providing specifically sized teeth to hold the prime volume before the dose to ensure priming occurs.
As shown in
While exemplary embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/478,837, filed Sep. 5, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/737,447, filed Apr. 7, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,905,970, which is the U.S. National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/004132, filed on Jul. 17, 2009, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/082,053, filed Jul. 18, 2008, the entire content of all said prior applications being hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1646374 | Wilkin | Oct 1927 | A |
2897765 | Kitano | Aug 1959 | A |
3057370 | Hamilton | Oct 1962 | A |
3218984 | Mosovsky | Nov 1965 | A |
3306228 | Drutchas | Feb 1967 | A |
3817117 | Kita | Jun 1974 | A |
4106361 | Burtis | Aug 1978 | A |
4130383 | Moinuddin | Dec 1978 | A |
4210173 | Choksi et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4253501 | Ogle | Mar 1981 | A |
4356727 | Brown et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4548562 | Hughson | Oct 1985 | A |
4623301 | Reynolds | Nov 1986 | A |
4645496 | Oscarsson | Feb 1987 | A |
4852352 | Leigh-Monstevens | Aug 1989 | A |
4905730 | Stoll | Mar 1990 | A |
4915688 | Bischof et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5002528 | Palestrant | Mar 1991 | A |
5246358 | Gu | Sep 1993 | A |
5439452 | McCarty | Aug 1995 | A |
5406228 | Evans | Nov 1995 | A |
5466228 | Evans | Nov 1995 | A |
5472403 | Comacchia | Dec 1995 | A |
5600951 | Helver | Feb 1997 | A |
5807312 | Dzwonkiewicz | Sep 1998 | A |
5823991 | Shim | Oct 1998 | A |
5911708 | Teirstein | Jun 1999 | A |
6048186 | Kitano | Apr 2000 | A |
6099511 | Devos et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6283734 | Blume | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6582387 | Derek et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6853450 | Baldwin et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7014436 | Klassen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7056307 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7232428 | Inukai et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7677526 | Lymberopoulos | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695445 | Yuki | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704236 | Denolly | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8052856 | Dorsey | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8211091 | Guzman | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8328787 | Guzman | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8444594 | Schweiger | May 2013 | B2 |
8689893 | Soltvedt | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8905970 | Bates et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020107501 | Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151854 | Duchon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040082904 | Houde et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089050 | Daw et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040166010 | Lafferty | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210162 | Wyatt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070060894 | Dai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088252 | Prestotnik et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070244435 | Hicks | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080167621 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090035121 | Watson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090221914 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100185040 | Uber et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
35 15 624 | Nov 1986 | DE |
1363025 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1499582 | Oct 1967 | FR |
6-23044 | Feb 1994 | JP |
2002-511317 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2005-508679 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-526467 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO-9601950 | Jan 1996 | WO |
2003-067091 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2006-032070 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006-123329 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007-117967 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for Application No. 09798312.6-2320/2303362, PCT/US2009/004132 dated May 16, 2012. |
Anonymous, Gear Pump, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Feb. 6, 2005, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File: Gear_pump.png. |
Notice of Rejection dated Jul. 20, 2013 issued by the Japanese Patent Office in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2011-518736. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP 11169439 dated May 16, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190255250 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61082053 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14478837 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 16405037 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12737447 | US | |
Child | 14478837 | US |