Additive fabrication, e.g., 3-dimensional (3D) printing, provides techniques for fabricating objects, typically by causing portions of a building material to solidify at specific locations. Additive fabrication techniques may include stereolithography, selective or fused deposition modeling, direct composite manufacturing, laminated object manufacturing, selective phase area deposition, multi-phase jet solidification, ballistic particle manufacturing, particle deposition, laser sintering or combinations thereof. Many additive fabrication techniques build objects by forming successive layers, which are typically cross-sections of the desired object. Typically each layer is formed such that it adheres to either a previously formed layer or a substrate upon which the object is built. In one approach to additive fabrication, known as stereolithography, solid objects are created by successively forming thin layers of a curable polymer resin, typically first onto a substrate and then one on top of another. Exposure to actinic radiation cures a thin layer of liquid resin, which causes it to harden and adhere to previously cured layers or to the bottom surface of the build platform.
Every additive manufacturing technology requires some form of specialized material. Additive manufacturing techniques using light to cure a liquid material, such as stereolithography (SLA and DLP), into an object require photocurable materials.
Many current additive manufacturing materials are formed from polymeric (meth)acrylates. (Meth)acrylates are useful in 3D printing applications because the monomers and oligomers are highly reactive through radical photopolymerization. This reactivity allows for the printing process to proceed more quickly and efficiently with a higher degree of accuracy. However, the reactivity may also introduce less favorable qualities or limit the types of qualities available in a 3D printing process. The end material may be brittle because the resulting polymer is generally inhomogenous and highly crosslinked. As additive manufacturing pushes to be applicable in more functional prototyping or end-use applications, the material capabilities of (meth)acrylate based polymers become a limiting factor.
Accordingly there is a need in the art for new materials and expanded material properties for applications of additive manufacturing.
The present disclosure relates generally to curable resins, in particular dual-cure resins, and related methods for use in an additive fabrication (e.g., 3-dimensional printing) device.
According to one or more embodiments, dual-cure resins for use in additive manufacturing are provided.
In some embodiments, the dual-cure resin may comprise a photo-curable component, configured to cure when subjected to an effective amount of actinic radiation, and a secondary component. The secondary component may comprise a first secondary precursor species and a second secondary precursor species. The first secondary precursor species may be configured to be physically isolated or substantially physically isolated from the second secondary precursor species until subjected to an initiating event (e.g., a dissolving event or a degrading event) that allows the first and second secondary precursor species to mix and cure. The initiation event may be a stimulus such as heat, mechanical force (e.g., sonication), addition of a catalyst, or some other mechanism.
In some embodiments, the secondary component may comprise a plurality of particles comprising a first secondary precursor species, wherein the plurality of particles are configured to dissolve when subjected to a dissolving event.
In some embodiments, the secondary component may comprise a plurality of encapsulants containing a first secondary precursor species, wherein the plurality of encapsulants are configured to degrade, when subjected to a degrading event, and release the first secondary precursor species for secondary curing.
According to one or more embodiments, methods of producing an additively-manufactured article are provided. In some embodiments, the method may comprise providing a dual-cure resin comprising a photo-curable component and a secondary component, the secondary component comprising a plurality of particles comprising a first secondary precursor species, the secondary component further comprising a second secondary precursor species. The method may further comprise subjecting the photo-curable component to actinic radiation to produce a photo-cured polymer. The method may further comprise subjecting the secondary component to a dissolving event to dissolve the plurality of particles. The method may further comprise reacting the first secondary precursor species with the second secondary precursor species to produce a secondary polymer, wherein the photo-cured polymer and the secondary polymer form an additively-manufactured article.
In some embodiments, the method may comprise providing a dual-cure resin comprising a photo-curable component and a secondary component, the secondary component comprising a plurality of encapsulants containing a first secondary precursor species, the secondary component further comprising a second secondary precursor species.
The method may further comprise subjecting the photo-curable component to actinic radiation to produce a photo-cured polymer.
The method may further comprise subjecting the secondary component to a degrading event to degrade the plurality of encapsulants and release the first heat-curable precursor species.
The method may further comprise reacting the first secondary precursor species with the second secondary precursor species to produce a secondary polymer, wherein the photo-cured polymer and the secondary polymer form an additively-manufactured article.
The foregoing is a non-limiting summary of the invention, which is defined by the attached claims.
Various aspects and embodiments will be described with reference to the following figures. It should be appreciated that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing.
The present disclosure relates generally to dual-cure resins and related methods for use in an additive fabrication (e.g., 3-dimensional printing) device.
As discussed above, in additive fabrication, a plurality of layers of material may be formed on a build platform. To illustrate one exemplary additive fabrication system, an inverse stereolithographic printer is depicted in
During operation, photopolymer resin may be dispensed from the dispensing system 104 into container 102. Build platform 105 may be positioned along a vertical axis 103 (oriented along the z-axis direction as shown in
In the example of
Following the photo-curing of a layer of material, a separation process is typically conducted so as to break any bonds (e.g., adhesive bonds) that may have been produced between the cured material and the bottom 111 of container 102. As one example, build platform 105 may be moved along the vertical axis of motion 103 in order to reposition the build platform 105 for the formation of a new layer and/or to impose separation forces upon any bond with the bottom 111 of container 102. In addition, container 102 is mounted onto the support base such that the stereolithographic printer 101 may move the container along horizontal axis of motion 110, the motion thereby advantageously introducing additional separation forces in at least some cases. An optional wiper 106 is additionally provided, capable of motion along the horizontal axis of motion 110 and which may be removably or otherwise mounted onto the support base at 109.
According to one or more embodiments,
As described above, stereolithographic printers 100 and 200 shown in
To illustrate one exemplary additive fabrication technique in which a part is formed in contact with a surface other than another layer or the build platform, an inverse stereolithographic printer is depicted after forming several layers of an object 203 in
According to one or more embodiments, the liquid resin may comprise a combination of oligomers, monomers, and photoinitiators. This basic liquid resin could optionally include pigments, dyes, and other specialty additives as well. The liquid resin may comprise a first component comprising one or more of the types of species listed above, as well as others. The first component of the liquid resin may be configured to cure upon exposure to actinic radiation. The liquid resin may further comprise a second component comprising one or more of the type of species listed above or others. The second component of the liquid resin may be configured to cure in response to an initiating event (e.g., application of heat). Liquid resins that include both first and second curing components are referred to herein as dual-cure resins. In one embodiment the liquid resin is dispensed from the dispensing system 104 into the container 102. With everything in place as discussed above with printer 100 or 200, the source of actinic radiation can be used to expose the liquid resin. The actinic radiation would cause the photoinitiators to form photo-reactive species. These photo-reactive species may then react with monomeric or polymeric components and initiate a cross-linking or further polymerization reaction. This polymerization causes the layer to cure in the cross section exposed to actinic radiation. This cross section adheres to either the build platform 205 or to the previous layer of the object 203. The object formed would be made of a polymeric material. The type and properties of the material would depend on the monomeric, oligomeric, and/or polymeric (meth)acrylates used as the base of the resin.
Dual-cure resins for use in additive manufacturing are generally described herein. As used herein, the term “dual-cure resin” refers to a resin having at least two separate curing steps that may occur simultaneously or sequentially. For example, according to some embodiments of the invention, a dual-cure resin may comprise a first component configured to cure when subjected to actinic radiation and a second component in which curing is initialized through a separate event, such as the application of heat. Other mechanisms for initializing curing are also possible, as discussed herein.
Incorporating a secondary polymerization mechanism may make many more polymeric chemistries accessible to additive manufacturing leading to outstanding and diverse mechanical properties that would be difficult or impossible to achieve in a single-cure resin. According to one or more embodiments, the primary or initial cure step would rely on traditional additive manufacturing techniques to create a scaffolding or green article. Once the initial reaction constructs the desired object, the secondary reaction may take place and the desired properties, such as increased strength, may be attained. In some embodiments, a two-step cure may allow for time to adjust the shape or placement of the material while it is in a gel-like form before subjecting the article to the secondary cure mechanism that would more completely harden the material.
Embodiments presently disclosed fulfill a need in the industry for new polymeric materials with longer-term shelf stability and enhanced ranges of material properties. Some embodiments disclosed herein accomplish these goals by physically isolating a species of the secondary cure component such that it is entirely or substantially non-reactive until an initiating event (e.g., application of sufficient heat). Keeping the precursor species of the secondary cure physically isolated from one another at ambient conditions allows for the initial cure step to form a “green” structure or scaffold in the desired shape that can then undergo the secondary cure process to finalize the mechanical properties of the material, according to some embodiments.
The dual-cure resin may comprise a primary component for forming a first polymer and a secondary component for forming a second polymer. Each of the components may comprise one or more precursor species that cure, or react to form polymers (e.g., (meth)acrylate or polyurea), upon the initiation of certain conditions.
The primary component may comprise a photo-curable component configured to cure when subjected to an effective amount of actinic radiation. The cured polymeric material may be a type of (meth)acrylate or acrylate polymer. (meth)acrylates are useful in 3D printing applications because the monomers and oligomers are generally stable in ambient conditions. The photo-curable component may further comprise photo-initiator. With the addition of a photoinitiator and the relevant light source, the materials may become highly reactive through radical photopolymerization, and cure to form a polymer. The article formed at this stage may be referred to as a “green” article, indicative of the fact that further curing and strengthening may take place.
The resin may further comprise a secondary component configured to cure, or react to form a secondary polymer, upon the initiation of certain conditions. The secondary polymer may comprise a first secondary precursor species and a second secondary precursor species. According to certain embodiment, the first secondary precursor species is configured to be physically isolated or substantially physically isolated from the second secondary precursor species until subjected to an initiating event that allows the first and second secondary precursor species to mix and cure. The initiation event may be a stimulus such as heat, mechanical force (e.g., sonication), addition of a catalyst, or some other mechanism.
In some embodiments, isolating a precursor species of the secondary cure component allows the initial or primary cure reaction (e.g., photoreaction) to proceed without interference, while maintaining the secondary cure precursor species dispersed in the initially cured object. Once the initiation factor is provided, the active compound of the secondary cure is released and the secondary cure reaction can proceed. In some embodiments, isolation of a secondary precursor species (either through encapsulation or particularization) allows the resin to be created in a single cartridge system reducing waste and improving the customer experience.
Dual-cure resins disclosed herein may have long shelf and/or pot life. Delay of secondary curing (via physical isolation of a precursor species) may allow for a longer pot and/or shelf life for the dual-cure resin. As a result of its long shelf life, according to some embodiments, dual-cure resins disclosed herein may be manufactured and sold with the first and second cure components both already disposed in a single resin composition (e.g., in a single cartridge), thereby reducing the impact of human error or other complications related to properly mixing two compositions. In embodiments in which the first and second components are mixed post-sale by a consumer, the resulting liquid resin may have a shelf life and/or pot life of at least a week, a month, six months, or a year.
Prior to curing, the first and second secondary precursor species may reside in the same resin (for example, in the same pot or in the same chamber of a cartridge, or in the same “green” article), while the first secondary precursor species remains physically isolated or substantially physically isolated from the second secondary precursor species, thereby preventing premature curing. For example, the first precursor species of the secondary component may be encapsulated by a shell which presents a physical barrier physically isolating it from the second precursor species to prevent curing. In another example, the first species is present in the resin in an insoluble particle or a powder form, allowing only a small fraction of that precursor species (e.g., the small percentage of material at the surface of each particle) to be exposed to another precursor species, thereby substantially physically isolating the precursor species from one another. The physical isolation of the precursor species may then be eliminated upon the occurrence of an initiating event, allowing the precursors to mix and cure. For example, where one of the precursor species is encapsulated, the initiating event may be a degrading event—an event which causes the encapsulating shell to degrade and release the formerly physically isolated precursor species. In embodiments in which one of the precursors is suspended in particle form, the initiating event may be a dissolving event—an event which causes the particle comprising the precursor species to dissolve and release the formerly substantially physically isolated precursor species. The degrading or dissolving event may comprise any of application of heat or mechanical force (e.g., vibrational force), or introduction of a chemical species (e.g., a solvent or catalyst). Other mechanisms are also possible.
Embodiments described herein, in which different precursor species of a secondary component are physically isolated from one another even where both are present in the same resin mixture to prevent curing, may be distinguished from alternative mechanisms in which precursor species are prevented from curing due to a blocking chemistry mechanism. Resin compositions employing blocking chemistry bond a blocking functional group to one of the precursor species to prevent it from reacting with a second precursor species and curing. Once it is time to allow curing to take place, an intermediary reaction is triggered, for example, by the application of heat, to react and remove the blocking agent, allowing the two precursor species to proceed to cure. The presence of a blocker group on a precursor species does not constitute it being physically isolated, at least as that term is used herein.
Using blocked polymers for additive manufacturing application risks leaving small molecules in the final object, at least in some embodiments. These small molecules can be plasticizing agents. Plasticizer may affect the material properties or leach out of the finished object over time. Such leaching may make the object unsuitable for certain applications such as medical or food grade materials. Furthermore, potential solutions for removing blocking molecules may result in additional problems, such as reducing the speed at which the secondary cure step can proceed.
The approach of blocking chemistry has three primary disadvantages. (1) If the small molecule does not remain bound to the backbone after deblocking, it may act as a plasticizer potentially leaching out of the cured object affecting mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and may impact available applications overall. (2) Where the small molecule is bound in the backbone of the polymer network, the resulting reaction may have a slow cure rate and/or require a high curing temperature, as the blocking reaction will continue in the forward and reverse direction requiring long curing times and substantially high temperatures (3) The blocked isocyanate could be a urethane or urea compound, which is, by its nature, much higher in viscosity than its unblocked isocyanate counterpart due to hydrogen bonding with itself. For this reason, most commercially available blocked isocyanates (such as Baxenden Trixene BI series) have a very high viscosity for relatively low isocyanate contents. As such, only small amounts of the blocked isocyanates can be reasonably included in the resin while keeping the viscosity at printable levels. This limits the concentration of urethane/urea bonds in the postcured polymer network and thus limits the resulting materials properties. Additionally, with conventionally available blocked polymers, the reaction proceeds in ambient conditions at some level. This increases the viscosity of the material and decreases the pot life.
As already mentioned, the physical isolation or separation of secondary species may be accomplished with the use of encapsulants. According to one or more embodiments, the secondary component comprises a plurality of encapsulants containing a first secondary precursor species, wherein the plurality of encapsulants are configured to degrade, when subjected to a degrading event (e.g., application of an effective amount of heat), and release the first secondary precursor species for secondary curing. The encapsulant may comprise, for example, a wax or polymer shell. The encapsulant could be, for example, a wax or polymer shell that ruptures with phase transition or expansion of the inner encapsulated material when sufficient heat is applied. The secondary component may further comprise a second secondary precursor species configured to react with the released secondary precursor species to produce a secondary polymer.
The substantial physical isolation or separation of secondary species may, alternatively or additionally, be accomplished with the use of particles that are insoluble in the resin at ambient conditions. For example, according to one or more embodiments, the secondary component comprises a plurality of particles, in turn, comprising a first secondary precursor species. The plurality of particles may be configured to dissolve when subjected to a dissolving event (e.g., application of an effective amount of heat). Until subjected to the dissolving event, however, the plurality of particles may be configured to remain substantially undissolved. The insoluble particles may remain suspended and dispersed in the liquid photopolymer resin as it is hardened into the green article during the initial cure step. Once the initiation factor is provided (e.g., sufficient heat is applied), the particles may become more soluble in the hardened material, allowing the dissolved precursor species to mix with other precursor species and allow the second cure reaction to begin.
According to one or more embodiments, the different precursor species may be selected to form a desired secondary polymer. The secondary polymer may be a thermoset plastic. The secondary polymer may be, for example, a polyurea, a polyurethane, and/or an epoxy. Other secondary polymers are also possible.
The use of secondary polymers in addition to the primary polymer (e.g., methacrylate) can facilitate an expansion of available material properties. For example polyureas tend to have more desirable chemical, heat response, and resistance to aging. Additionally polyureas can be stronger with a higher elongation making the resulting material tougher and better able to withstand repeated use. Additionally, polyepoxides (epoxies) are a class of thermosetting polymer with desirable mechanical properties such as, temperature and chemical resistance. The following discussion relates to polyureas, polyuretheanes, and polyexpoxides, but can be applied to any number of polymer groups as one skilled in the art would understand.
In some embodiments, the secondary cure component may be configured to form a polyurea upon curing.
In conventional polyurea synthesis, a two-step approach is typically used. For example, first, a small molecule diisocyanate monomer is reacted in excess with a large difunctional amine. Second, an amine-based chain extender is added to form the complete polymer. An example of a conventional polyurea synthesis is shown in
In embodiments of the present invention, where the secondary polymer is polyurea, at least one of the precursor species may be fully or substantially physically isolated from a second precursor species. For example, the first precursor species may be present in the form of insoluble particles. Alternatively, the first precursor species may be encapsulated.
The first precursor species (with limited exposure) may comprise an amine. It may comprise a polyamine. It may comprise a diamine, it may comprise dicyandiamide (DICY). The first precursor species (e.g., DICY) may be present in particle form or encapsulated. In some embodiments, the first precursor species may comprise 3,3′ diaminodiphenyl sulfone high temperature aromatic amine curing agent.
The second precursor species (which is generally, although not necessarily, not isolated within the resin) may comprise an isocyanate species. For example, the second precursor species may comprise a polyisocyanate species. The second precursor species may comprise a diisocyanate species. Upon being introduced to each other the first and second precursor species react to form polyurea.
In some embodiments, the amine reactant may comprise an amine reactant that is present as an insoluble particle at ambient temperature and starts to dissolve at elevated temperatures. Increasing the temperature may improve the solubility and diffusion of the amine reactant which allows it to react. In some embodiments, dicyandiamide may be the amine reactant.
Use of DICY, instead of alternative traditional polyols or polyamines to form a a secondary polymer, may have several advantages. First, DICY-isocyanate based resins may be highly stable at ambient temperature and confer a much longer potlife (e.g., a pot life of several months or years). Second, use of DICY (or other particles) may be advantageous over use of liquid polyols which can lead to excessive leaching during postcure heating and even in the green state. Because DICY is a solid with a high melting point, leaching is not a concern. Use of a small molecule diamine, such as DICY, may aid in achieving high localized concentrations of urea groups upon the reaction of the amines with isocyanates, which may lead to even higher toughness polymers after postcuring. (Small molecule polyols usually have low melting points and often result in leaching at high temperatures.)
In some embodiments, the secondary cure component may be configured to form a polyurethane.
In conventional polyurethane synthesis, a two-step approach is typically used. For example, first, a small molecule diisocyanate monomer is reacted in excess with a large difunctional polyol. This first step may produce oligomeric isocyanates. Second, a small hydroxyl-based chain extender is added to form the complete secondary polymer. In some embodiments, the chain extender may be a polyol species or a polyamine species. An example of a conventional polyurea synthesis is shown in
In some embodiments configured to form polyurethane as the secondary polymer, the first precursor species (e.g., the isolated species) may comprise at least one of a chain extender and cross-linking agent. In some embodiments the chain extender or cross-linking agent may be encapsulated. Chain extenders and crosslinkers are discussed further herein.
In embodiments configured to form polyurethane, a second precursor species (which may be not encapsulated, not in particle form, or not otherwise isolated from the rest of the resin) may comprise an oligomeric isocyanate species. Upon being introduced, the precursor species may react to form polyurethane.
In some embodiments, the secondary cure component may be configured to form a polyepoxide, or epoxy. The first precursor species (with limited exposure) may comprise an amine. For example, it may comprise a polyamine. In some embodiments, the first precursor species may comprise a diamine. In some embodiments, the first precursor species may comprise dicyandiamide (DICY). The dicyandiamide may be present in particle form as discussed above, in related to dicyandiamide's potential use in forming polyurea.
The second precursor species (generally, but not necessarily, present in an unenecapsulated or non-particle form) may comprise an epoxide. Potential epoxy precursor species include Epon 828 (bisphenol A diglycidyl ether). In some embodiments, an amine accelerator may be incorporated into the process when forming epoxies, e.g. Ancamine 2442. Upon being introduced to each other after the initiating event, the first and second species may react to form an epoxy.
In embodiments where the secondary component comprises a plurality of particles, the particles may comprise dicyandiamide (DICY, also known as cyanoguanidine). DICY is a latent-curing agent which can be prepared as a powder dispersion in the liquid resin. For example, DICY may be used as a precursor for polyurea or epoxy formation.
The chemical structure of DICY, and the fact that it is an insoluble micronized powder, may result in an extremely low reaction rate at ambient temperature, both for epoxy-amine and isocyanate-amine curing mechanisms, allowing for improved shelf-life and pot-life. Some embodiments may incorporate micronized powders of DICY that are commercially available, such as those available from AIR PRODUCTS under the AMICURE brand name and from CVC THERMOSET SPECIALTIES under the OMICURE brand name. In some embodiments, the DICY powder may be OMICURE DDA5 from CVC SPECIALTIES, which has an average particle diameter of about 4 μm. The DICY powder may be used in combination with amine accelerator agents, such as ANCAMINE 2442 from AIR PRODUCTS, which serve to lower the cure temperature of the curing reaction to 120-150° C. These accelerators are often solids ground to ultra-fine particle size which are insoluble in resins at room temperature.
According to one or more embodiments, physical isolation of one or more secondary precursor species may be achieved by encapsulation of the species. The precursor species may remain isolated in the encapsulant, until an event triggers the degradation of the capsule and release of the precursor species. In some embodiments the encapsulated precursor species may be a chain extender and/or crosslinker species. In some embodiments, upon release from the encapsulant, the chain extender and/or crosslinker species may react with a precursor oligomer (e.g., a diisocyanate oligomer) to form polyurethane.
In some embodiments, precursor oligomers may be strengthened into a polymeric network by bonding with chain extender and/or crosslinker species. The links between precursor molecules are formed by reaction with chain extenders and/or crosslinkers that can react with functional groups from two or more separate oligomers. Both chain extenders and crosslinkers are low-molecular multifunctional species: Difunctional products can react to form a linear extended structure, and are generally referred to as chain extenders; Tri- and other multifunctional entities can react to form a tridimensional lattice, they are crosslinkers. However, in practice, sometimes usage of the two terms overlaps.
During the formation of, for example, polyurethane, chain extenders and/or crosslinkers may be used to join the end groups of isocyanate oligomers. Chain extenders and/or crosslinkers may be used to limit, or extend the rotation and conformation of oligomeric molecules. They can also be used to control the cross link density, or partial crystallization of the final structure of the polymer formed. Both of these parameters control the ability for the oligomers to organize and phase separate into microdomain regions, which, in turn, controls the final mechanical properties of the bulk polyurethane. Chain extenders are generally highly reactive molecules, often containing either an amine in the structure itself or as a separate catalyst.
In some embodiments, short diamines, diols, and/or triols are used as chain extenders and comprise the core of capsules protected by low molecular weight polyolefins or waxes as the shell material. In some embodiments, the chain extenders may comprise triethylene glycol, glycerol, hexamethylenediamine, and/or triethanolamine. Some embodiments may further comprise an additional catalyst, for example, dibutyltin dilaurate and/or DABCO.
In some embodiments, the encapsulant may comprise a polymer species. In some embodiments, the encapsulant may comprise a polyolefin wax. In some embodiments, the encapsulant may be selected to have a particular melting point. In some embodiments, the encapsulant is configured to degrade and release its contents when the composition is heated to reach the melting point temperature, allowing for secondary curing and the formation of the secondary polymer (e.g., polyurethane network). The melting point of the encapsulant should be sufficient to survive a range of shipping and storage temperatures, but not so high that damage to a first stage cure (e.g., photocured methacrylate component) would be incurred prior to the encapsulant melting. The encapsulant size selected may depend on various parameters. In some embodiments, the encapsulant diameter is from about 1 micron to about 50 microns.
Encapsulation of a secondary precursor species (e.g., chain extender) may be achieved through different processes, as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Emulsification may be performed with, for example, a T25 ultraturrax homogenizer, a tip ultrasonicator, a membrane emulsifier, or a microfluidic device. Cooling while maintaining the emulsion allows for solidification of the wax shell and therefore, formation of capsules. The capsules may be washed with pure water to remove the surfactant and any surface contaminates. The capsules may be dried under ambient conditions or using any drying methods known in the art including but not limited to low pressure partial vacuum drying, forced convection drying, spray drying, or lyophilization. The microcapsules may then mixed into a composition with another secondary precursor species (e.g., isocyanate oligomer) and a first, photocurable component (e.g., an acrylate-based component) at the proper stoichiometric amount or some amount more than the stoichiometric amount to ensure full reaction. At this stage, the composition may be ready for use in stereolithographic printing.
In some embodiments, the wax shell may be degraded by heating the composition, after a first photocuring stage, allowing the chain extenders to mix and interact with the isocyanates bound into the acrylic network formed during printing and building a crosslinked polyurethane network inside the acrylic matrix.
The secondary component may comprise additional precursor species. For example, according to some embodiments, a second precursor species may comprise an isocyanate species. In some embodiments, the isocyanate species may be an isocyanate-terminated oligomer. In some embodiments, use of an isocyanate oligomer may provide advantages such as reduced toxicity as compared to small molecule isocyanates. Additionally, the multi-functional oligomers may allow for a greater breadth of characteristics as the oligomeric components may be tailored for specific properties. For example, in some embodiments, the oligomeric components may be tailored to allow for photopolymerization while the isocyanate-terminated region remains available for use in a second reaction resulting in formation of a secondary polymer.
In some embodiments, oligomeric formation may be done in bulk phase with agitation as well as heating and cooling, as needed, giving sufficient time for the reaction to proceed to completion. The ratio of short rigid MDI molecule to flexible polyol may affect the properties of the final polyurethane. According to some embodiments, shorter linear polyol chains result in lower elongation, while longer linear polyol chains result in higher elongation more flexible materials.
Resin formulations may further comprise various additives. For example, in some embodiments, the resin may comprise treated and/or untreated fumed silica (e.g., AEROSIL 200) to mitigate settling of particles or capsules. Rubber toughening agents (e.g. Albidur EP 2240 A epoxy-coated silicone core-shell particles) may also be used in some embodiments. Other additives may also be used.
Pot life is the term of usability for a mixture typically determined under ambient conditions. Additive manufacturing techniques may require a long pot life such that a mixture is usable for the duration of the print. Print times may range from very short times of just a few minutes to multiple days. Additionally, it may be advantageous to extend the pot life much beyond the duration of a single print, such that the consumer may experience the greatest ease of use with minimal wasted material.
Shelf life is the term of usability for a mixture typically determined from manufacture until final use, and under a variety of conditions and temperatures that could be expected during shipping and storage, as well as ambient conditions or in the printer itself. It may be advantageous to extend the shelf life of a resin to a sufficient length of time, so as to allow the resin to be pre-mixed at a manufacturing stage, rather than mixed by a user post-purchase. It may be advantageous to have a shelf life of one month, three months, a year, or longer.
Improved pot and shelf life of the resin is facilitated, in part, by having the secondary polymerization component remain dormant for long periods of time under ambient conditions (e.g., ambient temperature and moisture). Premature gelation or viscosity increases in the liquid resin, as the result, for example, of reaction in the presence of moisture, may reduce pot/shelf life. As portions of the secondary component react, the viscosity increases, in turn impacting various mechanisms of the additive manufacturing process such as separation of the object from the container and material mobility for printing subsequent layers, and reducing the term of usability of the resin.
Accordingly, the methods and compositions described herein, in which a first precursor species is fully or substantially physically isolated from a second precursor species until an initiating event, may provide for improved pot and shelf life.
According to one or more embodiments, the liquid resin may have a viscosity of from about 1 cP to about 10,000 cP, or of from about about 1,000 cP to about 5,000 cP, when measured at a temperature 30 □. Other values are also possible.
In some embodiments, the photocurable component and the secondary component are present in the dual-resin formulation at certain ratios by weight. For example, in some embodiments, the ratio by weight of photocurable component to secondary component is from about 20:80 to about 80:20, or from about 40:60 to about 60:40 or at about 50:50. In some embodiment the ratios of first component to second component may be selected to balance the desire for high secondary polymer content to the desire for a high strength in the “green” state (i.e. prior to curing the secondary polymer).
Within the secondary component, a first protected or isolated precursor species may be present in a certain ratio to a second unprotected precursor species so as to provide the correct stoichiometric amounts to allow the reaction to proceed, or some amount more than the stoichiometric amount to ensure full reaction. Such a ratio will depend on the molecular weight of the different species.
According to one or more embodiments in which heat is applied to release a secondary precursor species (e.g., either by dissolving particles or degrading capsules), the dissolution or degradation may occur at a temperature selected to be high enough to avoid premature release (e.g., during fluctuations in shipping and storage temperatures), but not so high that the temperature would damage the green structure formed by a photocured component. In some embodiments the temperature of release may be between 60° C. and 180° C., between 100° C. and 160° C., or between 140° C. and 150° C. Other temperature ranges are also possible.
One issue with using an insoluble particle or capsule component in the liquid resin is the effect it may have on the viscosity of the final liquid photopolymer. For this reason, the particle or capsule size of any material considered is an important factor. Particle size affects (a) how well the particles or capsules stay in suspension, and (b) ability to minimize the impact on print layer thickness. In some embodiments, particles or capsules are between 0.1 micron and 200 micron in diameter on average, or between 1 micron and 30 micron in diameter on average. Other sizes are also possible. Smaller particles or capsules may be more optimal by reducing the viscosity of the resin, remaining better suspended, and not interfering with layer thickness.
The compositions and resins described above may be incorporated into methods for additively manufacturing articles.
Methods may comprise providing a dual-cure resin comprising a photo-curable component and a secondary component, according to one or more embodiments of the invention described above.
Methods may further comprise subjecting the photo-curable component to actinic radiation to produce a photo-cured polymer. The step of subjecting the photo-curable component to actinic radiation to produce the photo-cured polymer may comprise forming successive layers of the photo-cured polymer to produce a green article comprising the secondary component.
Methods may further comprise subjecting the secondary component to an initiating event to allow a previously isolated or substantially isolated precursor species to react with a second precursor species to form a secondary cure and provide a manufactured article. The secondary cure may comprise a secondary polymer, such as a polyurea, polyurethane, or epoxy, as described herein. In some embodiments, the initiating event may occur while the article is a green article (i.e., after the photo-curing step).
In embodiments in which a precursor species is contained in a plurality of particles, the initiating event may be a dissolving event in which the particles are dissolved, releasing the precursor species. In embodiments in which the precursor species is encapsulated, the initiating event may be a degrading event, in which the capsules are degraded, releasing the precursor species.
While some of the above description has focused on the application of heat as an initiating event for causing dissolution of particles or degradation of encapsulants, it should be understood that other mechanisms may be applied. As discussed above, the initiating event (e.g., dissolving or degrading event) may be accomplished by a variety of mechanisms: applying an effective amount of heat; applying an effective mechanical force (e.g., vibrational force); introducing a chemical species (e.g., a solvent or a catalyst). In some embodiments, application of an effective mechanical force comprises use of sonication to degrade an encapsulant (e.g., a polymeric encapsulant) to release a secondary precursor species. Sonication is known to cause degradation and cleavage of polymers. It is possible to selectively adjust the process to break particular bonds. It would also be possible to introduce a chemical species such as a solvent or catalyst to cause degradation of an encapsulant or dissolution of a particle.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art.
Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Further, though advantages of the present invention are indicated, it should be appreciated that not every embodiment of the technology described herein will include every described advantage. Some embodiments may not implement any features described as advantageous herein and in some instances one or more of the described features may be implemented to achieve further embodiments. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
Various aspects of the present invention may be used alone, in combination, or in a variety of arrangements not specifically discussed in the embodiments described in the foregoing and is therefore not limited in its application to the details and arrangement of components set forth in the foregoing description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments.
Also, the invention may be embodied as a method, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3726835 | Bertozzi | Apr 1973 | A |
3947426 | Lander | Mar 1976 | A |
4463143 | Holubka | Jul 1984 | A |
4528081 | Lien et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4603168 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4801477 | Fudim | Jan 1989 | A |
4961154 | Pomerantz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4996282 | Noren et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5059359 | Hull et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5122441 | Lawton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143663 | Leyden et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5143817 | Lawton et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5171490 | Fudim | Dec 1992 | A |
5182056 | Spence et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192559 | Hull et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198159 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5236637 | Hull | Aug 1993 | A |
5247180 | Mitcham et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263130 | Pomerantz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271882 | Shirahata et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5310869 | Lewis et al. | May 1994 | A |
5391072 | Lawton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5418112 | Mirle et al. | May 1995 | A |
5447822 | Hull et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468831 | Lenke et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5510226 | Lapin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523193 | Nelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5529473 | Lawton et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554336 | Hull | Sep 1996 | A |
5569431 | Hull | Oct 1996 | A |
5573721 | Gillette | Nov 1996 | A |
5597520 | Smalley et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609812 | Childers et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609813 | Allison et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630981 | Hull | May 1997 | A |
5637169 | Hull et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651934 | Almquist et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674921 | Regula et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679719 | Klemarczyk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5695708 | Karp et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5732477 | Toyama | Mar 1998 | A |
5762856 | Hull | Jun 1998 | A |
5772947 | Hull et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779967 | Hull | Jul 1998 | A |
5785918 | Hull | Jul 1998 | A |
5807519 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814265 | Hull | Sep 1998 | A |
5824252 | Miyajima | Oct 1998 | A |
5863486 | Ozaki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5945058 | Manners et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5972563 | Steinmann et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6027324 | Hull | Feb 2000 | A |
6027682 | Almquist et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036910 | Tamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054250 | Sitzmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6281307 | Muhlebach et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6391245 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6451870 | DeCato et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6500378 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6547552 | Fudim | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563207 | Shinma | May 2003 | B2 |
6617413 | Bruchmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652799 | Seng et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6942830 | Mulhaupt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7023432 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7049370 | Lettmann et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052263 | John | May 2006 | B2 |
7090910 | Courtoy et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105584 | Chambers et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7195472 | John | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7300619 | Napadensky et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318718 | Ueno | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7438846 | John | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7556490 | Wicker et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573561 | Fries | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7629400 | Hyman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636610 | Schillen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7709544 | Doyle et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7783371 | John et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790093 | Shkolnik et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794790 | Michels et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831328 | Schillen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845930 | Shkolnik et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7892474 | Shkolnik et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894921 | John et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7962238 | Shkolnik et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003040 | El-Siblani | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8110135 | El-Siblani et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126580 | El-Siblani et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8286236 | Jung et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
RE43955 | Shkolnik et al. | Feb 2013 | E |
8372330 | El-Siblani et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394313 | El-Siblani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404173 | Cregger | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8465689 | Sperry et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8524816 | Badyrka et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8658076 | El-Siblani | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8757789 | Van Thillo et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758860 | Pyles et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
9034568 | McLeod et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9360757 | DeSimone et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9453142 | Rolland et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9498920 | DeSimone et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9598606 | Rolland et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9676963 | Rolland et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20020120068 | Soane et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030090034 | Mulhaupt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030173713 | Huang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040023145 | Moussa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052966 | Wilke et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084520 | Muehl et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110856 | Young et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126694 | Devoe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135292 | Coats et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050048404 | Okamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101684 | You et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050209427 | Detrembleur et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060051394 | Moore et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066006 | Haraldsson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060223901 | Xu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239986 | Perez-Luna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070063389 | John | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070205528 | Patel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260349 | John et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080038396 | John et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063867 | Schlienger et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080113293 | Shkolnik et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080174050 | Kikuchi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220339 | Zakrevskyy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090020901 | Schillen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061152 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099600 | Moore et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090130449 | El-Siblani | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132081 | Schillen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137750 | Ludewig et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146344 | El-Siblani | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100022676 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100105794 | Dietliker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140850 | Napadensky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100247876 | Omino et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249979 | John et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100304088 | Steeman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323301 | Tang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009992 | Shkolnik et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110062633 | Shkolnik et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110089610 | El-Siblani et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101570 | John et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110196529 | Shkolnik et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110260365 | El-Siblani | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120007287 | Vermeer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027964 | Hood et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120058314 | Mikami et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077038 | Pyles et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080824 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095162 | Bruchmann et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120251841 | Southwell et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130184384 | Liu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130252178 | McLeod et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130276653 | Daems et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130292862 | Joyce | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130295212 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304233 | Dean et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130309448 | Striegler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140010858 | Stankus et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140055544 | Iraqi et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072806 | Allen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085620 | Lobovsky et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140109784 | DAems et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140128132 | Cox, III | May 2014 | A1 |
20140265034 | Dudley | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140361463 | DeSimone et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150050473 | Seo et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150072293 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097316 | DeSimone et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150290876 | Liu et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150322291 | Salviato et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160059484 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160059486 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160059487 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160136889 | Rolland et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160137838 | Rolland et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160137839 | Rolland et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160077 | Rolland et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20180229436 | Gu | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1270614 | Oct 2000 | CN |
101776846 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102746785 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103029301 | Apr 2013 | CN |
203254661 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103895231 | Jul 2014 | CN |
4125534 | Feb 1993 | DE |
9319405 | Mar 1994 | DE |
4326986 | Dec 1994 | DE |
202013103446 | Aug 2013 | DE |
0484086 | May 1992 | EP |
0830641 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0945744 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1341039 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1918316 | May 2008 | EP |
2503391 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2955004 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2956823 | Dec 2015 | EP |
274727 | Oct 2011 | IT |
H08-192469 | Jul 1996 | JP |
1002739 | Mar 1996 | NL |
WO 9513565 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9600412 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9836323 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9909103 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9952017 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0172501 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03029366 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03104296 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004022318 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2005110722 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2008055533 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008076184 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008119688 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009003696 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009005576 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009021256 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009053099 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009053100 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009053100 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009070877 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010064733 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010077097 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2011086450 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011111957 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2012024675 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012041519 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012045660 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2014020400 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014095724 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014126830 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014126834 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014126837 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014165265 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2015002071 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO 2015017421 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2015077419 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015164234 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO 2015195909 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015195920 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015195924 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015200173 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015200179 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015200189 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015200201 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2016126779 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016145050 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3D Printing Forum, 3D Print Board, Kudo3D Titan1, Same Technology as Form 1?, May 30, 2014. 1 page. |
3DSYSTEMS, Projet 1200, Micro-SLA, Low-Cost Professional 3D Printer, 2013, 2 pages. |
3DSYSTEMS, V-Flash, Personal 3D Printer, 2011, 2 pages. |
Adzima, Brian, The Ember Printer: An Open Platform for Software, Hardware, and Materials Development, Adzima.sub.--UV.ebWest2015, printed from the internet on Mar. 16, 2015 at URL https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed.sub.--code/45733940. 29 pages. |
Anderson C. “Dreaming in 3D”, Wired, Oct. 2012, p. 136-143 (2012). |
Atala et al. “Engineering Complex Tissues”, Science Translational Medicine, Nov. 14, 2012, vol. 4, Issue 160, 11 Pages. |
B9Creator, Topic: PDMS and VAT, Feb. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
B9Creator, Topic: PDMS replacement advice sough: thanks in advance, Dec. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
B9Creator, Topic: Resin Technology/Discssion, Nov. 30, 2012, 5 pages. |
BASF, The Chemical Company, Photoacid Generator Selection Guide for the Electronics Industry and Energy Curable Coatings, 2010, 3 pages. |
Bauer et al. “25th Anniversary Article: A Soft Future: From Robots and Sensor Skin to Energy Harvesters”, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 149-162. |
Bauer et al. “High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture”, PNAS, Feb. 18, 2014, vol. 111, No. 7, 2453-2458. |
Bedal B. et al. “Advances in Part Accuracy”, Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies, from Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling, Paul F. Jacobs, Ph.D., Society of Manufacturing Engineers, p. 149-181, (1996). |
Bertsch, A. et al. “Rapid prototyping of small size objects”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2000, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 259-266. |
Bhattacharjee et al. “Writing in the granular gel medium”, Sci. Adv., 2015;1:e1500655, Sep. 25, 2015. 6 pages. |
Bichler et al. “Functional flexible organic-inorganic hybrid polymer for tow photon patterning of optical waveguides”, Optical Materials, vol. 34, Issue 5, Mar. 2012, pp. 772-780. |
Burns, M. “Automated Fabrication-Improving Productivity in Manufacturing”, 1993 (ISBN 0-13-119462-3) pp. 40-49. |
Bylinsky, Gene “Industry's Amazing New Instant Prototypes”, Reporter Associate Alicia Hills Moore, Jan. 12, 1998, 12 Pages. |
Chakraborty et al. “Coarse-grained foldable, physical model of the polypeptide chain”, PNAS, Aug. 13, 2013, vol. 110, No. 33, 13368-13373. |
Chen Y. et al. “A layerless additive manufacturing process based on CNC accumulation”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2011, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 218-227. |
Chisholm et al. “3D printed flow plates for the electrolysis of water: an economic and adaptable approach to device manufacture”, Energy Environ. Sci, 2014, 7, 3026-3032. |
Choi J. et al. “Multiple-material stereolithography”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2011, vol. 211, Issue 3, pp. 318-328. |
Choi J.W. et al. “Multi-material microstereolithography”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, vol. 49, pp. 543-551. |
Cvetkovic et al. “Three-dimensionally printed biological machines powered by skeletal muscle” PNAS, Jul. 15, 2014, vol. 111, No. 28, 10125-10130. |
De Jong. “Innovation Lessons From 3-D Printing”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter 2013, vol. 54, No. 2, p. 43-52 (2013). |
Deben Chen et al. “Studies on curing behavior of polyacrylate-epoxy complex coating”, European Polymer Journal, Mar./Apr. 1998, p. 523-530. |
DelViscio, Jeff, “Incredible New 3D Printing Technique Looks Like Sci-Fi”, Popular Mechanics, Mar. 16, 2015, Retrieved from the internet at URL http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a14586/carbon3d-3d-printer-res- in/. 9 pages. |
Dendukuri D et al. Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis Nature Materials. May 2006; 5:365-369. |
Dendukuri et al. “Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis”, Nature Materials, vol. 5, May 2006, 365-369. |
Dendukuri et al. “Modeling of Oxygen-Inhibited Free Radical Photopolymerization in a PDMS Microfluidic Device”, Macromolecules, 2008, 41:8547-8556. |
Dendukuri et al. “Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device”, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Lab on a Chip, 2007, 7:818-828. |
Dendukuri et al. “The Synthesis and Assembly of Polymeric Microparticles Using Microfluidics”, Adv. Mater. 2009, 21:4071-4086. |
Derby B. “Printing and Prototyping of Tissues and Scaffolds”, Science, vol. 338, Nov. 16, 2012, 921-926. |
DeSimone J. “What if 3D Printing Was 100x Faster?” TED Presentation Mar. 2015, Filmed Mar. 16, 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11 Pages. |
Deutsch S. “Plastics for 3D Printing”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 36-37 (2014). |
Deutsch S., “3D Printer Prizefight: Makerbot Replicator 2 vs. Formlabs Form 1”, Popular Mechanics, Nov. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Dougherty D. “A Brief History of Personal 3D Printing”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 8 (2014). |
Duoss et al. “Three-Dimensional Printing of Elastomeric, Cellular Architectures with Negative Stiffness”, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2014, 24, 4905-4913. |
Erkal et al. “3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated versatile and reusable electrodes”, Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 2023-2032. |
Feltman, Rachel, “This mind-blowing new 3-D printing technique is inspired by ‘Terminator 2’”, The Washington Post, Mar. 16, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet at URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/03/16/this--new-technology-blows-3d-printing-out-of-the-water-literally/. 3 pages. |
Fischer, Dr. Wolfgang et al. “Dual Cure, the Combination of Superiour Properties”, European Coatings Conference—Adhesion and Performance Enhancement, Sep. 2001, p. 277-296, Leverkusen, Germany. |
Gibson et al. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing, Spring, New York 2010, 472 pages. |
Gonzalez-Meijome et al. “Determination of Oxygen Permeability in Soft Contact Lenses Using a Polarographic Method: Estimation of relevant Physiological Parameters”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47, 3619-3629. |
Greenemeier L. “To Print the Impossible, Will 3-D printing transform conventional manufacturing?”, Scientific American, May 2013, vol. 308, No. 5, p. 44-47. |
Griffini et al., 3D-printable CFR polymer composites with dual-cure sequential IPNs. Polymer. May 17, 2016;91:174-9. |
Gross et al. “Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences”, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86, 3240-3253. |
Han L. et al. “Fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for heterogeneous tissue engineering”, Biomed Microdevices, 2010, No. 12, pp. 721-725. |
Han L. et al. “Projection Microfabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering”, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2008, vol. 130, 021005. 4 pages. |
Hausmann R. “How to Make the Next Big Thing”, Scientific American, May 2013, vol. 308, No. 5, p. 36-7. |
Ho Won Lee, “Three-Dimensional Micro Fabrication of Active Micro Devices Using Soft Functional Materials”, Dissertation, University of Illinois, 2011, Urbana, Illinois, 158 pages. |
Hornbeck, Larry J. “Digital Light Processing.TM. for High-Brightness, High-Resolution Applications”, Texas Instruments, Feb. 1997, 16 Pages. |
Hornbeck, Larry J. From cathode rays to digital micromirrors: A history of electronic projection display technology, Jul.-Sep. 1998, pp. 7-46. |
How It Works—Internet Articles, Texas Instruments, Inc., 1997, 15 Pages. |
Hribar KC et al. Light-assisted direct-write of 3D functional biomaterials. Lab Chip. Jan. 2014; 14(2): 268-275. |
Huang Y.M. et al. “On-line force monitoring of platform ascending rapid prototyping system”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, vol. 159, pp. 257-264. |
Inamdar A. et al. “Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine”, Proceedings of Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2006, Austin, TX, pp. 624-635. |
Infuehr et al. “Functional polymers by two-photon 3D lithography”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, Issue 4, Dec. 15, 2007, pp. 836-840. |
Jacobs P. “Postprocessing”, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing, Fundamentals of StereoLithography, First Edition, Paul F. Jacobs, Ph.D., Society of Manufacturing Engineers, p. 221-248. (1992). |
Jacobs, P. Fundamental Processes, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing, Fundamentals of StereoLithography, First Edition, Paul F. Jacobs, Ph.D., Society of Manufacturing Engineers, p. 79-110. (1992). |
Janusziewicz, Rima et al. “Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production”, PNAS Early Edition, Sep. 2016, 6 Pages. |
Jariwala et al. “Exposure controlled projection lithography for microlens fabrication”, Proc. SPIE 8249, Advanced Fabrication Technologies for Micro/Nano Optics and Photonics V. 824917, Feb. 9, 2012. 13 pages. |
Jariwala et al. “Real-Time Interferometric Monitoring System for Exposure Controlled Projection Lithography”, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas, 2011. 12 pages. |
Jeong et al. “UV-assisted capillary force lithography for engineering biomimetic multiscale hierarchical structures: From lotus leaf to gecko foot hairs”, Nanoscale, 2009, vol. 1:331-338, The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009. |
Kaziunas France A. “3D Printing Buyer's Guide; Here's how we tested, compared, and rated 30 new 3D printers, scanners, and filament bots”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 56-95 (2014). |
Kickstarter, Form 1: An affordable, professional 3D printer, by Formlabs, Oct. 26, 2012, 13 pages. |
Kim H. et al. “Scheduling and process planning for multiple material stereolithography”, Rapid Prototyping J., 2010, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 232-240. |
Kim H. et al. “Slice overlap detection algorithm for the process planning in multiple material stereolithography”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 1161-1170. |
Kitson et al. “Bringing Crystal Structures to Reality by Three-Dimensional Printing”, Crystal Growth & Design, 2014, 14, 2720-2724. |
Kudo3D First Print Checklist and PSP Handling Instructions, Version 1.0, 2015. 4 pages. |
Kudo3D Titan 1, (Ruby & Diamond Editions), Build Manual, Revision 2.0, 2015. 30 pages. |
Kudo3D Titan 1—Printing Guide, Revision 1.4, 2015. 11 pages. |
Kudo3D, The Titan 1, High Performance DLP SLA 3D Printer, 2014, 5 pages. |
Lee et al. “Advances in 3D nano/microfabrication using two-photon initiated polymerization”, Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 33, Issue 6, Jun. 2008, pp. 631-681. |
Lemoncurry, Open Source UV Photopolymer DLP 3D Printer, Apr. 30, 2012, 7 pages. |
Lemoncurry, Open Source UV Photopolymer DLP 3D Printer, Mar. 4, 2013, 10 pages. |
Ligon SC et al. Strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2014; 114: 557-589. |
Lipson H. et al. Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing, 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis, Indiana, Chapters 2 & 5, 50 pages. |
Lockman C. “Meet Your Maker, A New Approach to Product Development”, Perspectives, College of Business at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, p. 2-5, Spring 2013. |
Lu et al. “A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds”, J Biomed Mater Res, 77A:396-405, 2006. |
Maruo S. et al. “Multi-polymer microstereolithography for hybrid opto-MEMS”, Proceedings of the 14.sup.th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2001), 2001, pp. 151-154. |
Merkel et al. “Gas and Vapor Transport Properties of Perfluoropolymers”, Chapter 9, Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006, 251-270. |
Mohammadi G. “Jiving with Jarvis; what would you do with a professional 3D printer”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 38-39 (2014). |
Mohammadi G. et al. “Meet seven makers who started their won companies, Faces of 3D printing”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 25-27 (2014). |
Newcomb T. “Foot Prints, Your Next Pair of Sneakers Will Be Printed to Order”, Popular Science, p. 22, Jul. 2013. |
Pan Y et al. A fast mask projection stereolithography process for fabricating digital models in minutes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Oct. 2012; 134: pp. 051011-01 to 051011-09. |
Park Y-J et al. UV- and thermal-curing behaviors of dual-curable adhesives based on epoxy acrylate oligomers. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. Oct. 2009; 29(7):710-717. Abstract. |
Pearce J. “Building Research Equipment with Free, Open-Source Hardware”, Science, vol. 337, Sep. 14, 2012, 1303-1304. |
Rogers et al. “Materials and Mechanicals for Stretchable Electronics”, Science, vol. 327, Mar. 26, 2010, 1603-1607. |
Royte E. “The Printed World, 3-D Printing Promises a Factory in Every Home and a Whole Lot More”, Smithsonian, May 2013, p. 50-57 (2013). |
Schaedler et al. “Ultralight Metallic Microlattices”, Science, vol. 334, Nov. 18, 2011, 962-965. |
Shi J et al. Spatially controlled oxygen inhibition of acrylate photopolymerization as a new lithography method for high-performance organic thin-film transistors. Chemistry of Materials. 2010; 22(7): 2341-2346. |
Stern S.A. “The ‘Barrer’ Permeability Unit”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A-2, vol. 6, p. 1933-1934 (1968). |
Studer, Katia et al. “Dual Cured Polyurethane-Polyacrylate Coatings”, Europeans Coating Conference—Polyurethanes for High Performance Coatings III, Mar. 2004, p. 49-63, Berlin, Germany. |
Stultz M. “Metal Madness; Move past plastic—use your 3D printer to cast objects in metal”, Make: Ultimate Guide to 3D Printing 2014, p. 48-49 (2014). |
Suh et al. “Using Stop-Flow Lithography to Produce Opaque Microparticles: Synthesis and Modeling”, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 13813-13819. |
Sun C.N. et al. “Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask”, Sensors and Actuators A., 2005, vol. 121, pp. 113-120. |
Sun et al. “3D Printing of Interdigitated Li-Ion Microbattery Architectures”, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 4539-4543. |
Symes et al. “Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis”, Nature Chemistry, vol. 4, May 2012, 349-354. |
Tassel X. et al. “A new blocking agent of isocyanates”, European Polymer Journal, 36(9), 1745-1751 (2000). |
Thangawng et al. “UV Polymerization of Hydrodynamically Shaped Fibers”, ESI Lab on a Chip, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011. 5 pages. |
Titsch M. “Kudo3D's Titan 1 Approaches $400K on Kickstarter”, Jun. 5, 2014, 4 pages. |
Travitzky et al. “Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic-Based Materials”, Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 16, No. 6, 2014, 729-754. |
Tumbleston et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects, Science, Mar. 20, 2015, 347, 1349-52. |
Tumbleston et al. Supplementary Materials for Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects, Science, Mar. 16, 2015, 347, 1349-52. 13 pages. |
Urness et al. “Liquid deposition photolithography for submicrometer resolution three-dimensional index structuring with large throughput”, Light: Science & Applications (2013) 2, e56. 6 pages. |
Urness et al. “Liquid deposition photolithography for sub-micron resolution three-dimensional index structuring with large throughput”, Supplementary Information, 2013, 10 pages. |
Urness et al. “Lithographic Fabrication of Multi-Layered Optical Data Storage”, NLO/ISOM/ODS, 2011 OSA, OME2, 3 pages. |
Urness, Adam C. (2013) Liquid Deposition Photolithography for Efficient Three Dimensional Structuring, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado. 179 pages. |
Velankar et al. “High-Performance UV-Curable Urethane Acrylates via Deblocking Chemistry”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 62, Issue 9, 1361-1376, Nov. 28, 1996. |
Wicker R. et al. “Multiple material micro-fabrication: extending stereo lithography to tissue engineering and other novel applications”, Proceedings of Annual Solid Freeform fabrication Symposium, 2005, Austin, TX, pp. 754-764. |
Wohlers, Terry “Eight years of rapid prototyping”, RP Direct, 1997 Directory, 9 pages. |
Yagci et al. “Photoinitiated Polymerization: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities”, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 6245-6260. |
Yasuda H. “Permeability of Polymer Membranes to Dissolved Oxygen”, Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 4, p. 1314-1316 (1966). |
Ying et al. “Hydrolyzable Polyureas Bearing Hindered Urea Bonds”, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136, 16974-16977, (2014). |
Zheng et al. “Ultralight, Ultrastiff Mechanical Metamaterials”, Science, vol. 344, Issue 6190, Jun. 20, 2014, 1373-1377. |
Zhou C et al. Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projection-based sterolithography. http://www.bcf.usc.edu/.about.youngchen/Research/Digital.sub.--Material.s- ub.--2012.pdf, pp. 1/16 to 16/16, also published in: Rapid Prototyping Journal.Apr. 2013; 19(3):153-165. |
Zhou, “Development of a Multi-material Mask-Image-Projection-based Stereolithography for the Fabrication of Digital Materials”, Paper, presented at Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011, held Aug. 8-10, 2011, 16 pages, University of SouthernCalifornia, Los Angeles, USA, available at URL http://utwired.engr.utexas.edu/lff/symposium/proceedingsArchive/pubs/Manuscripts/2011/2011-06-Zhou.pdf. |