The present disclosure generally relates to a device for improving the maneuverability and versatility of marine vehicles in navigable waters comprising a plurality of rudders coupled to a plurality of rudder stocks wherein the rudders may turn at different angles relative to one another. The present disclosure also relates to methods of using such devices on new marine vehicles, as well as methods of retrofitting existing marine vehicles to include such devices. The present disclosure also relates to kits or systems comprising such devices.
Numerous marine vehicles operate in shallow and restricted waters where maneuverability is a primary safety concern. Pushboats, Towboats, and Tugboats are some of the most common marine vehicles that navigate shallow waters and waters with strong currents. The maneuverability of a marine vehicle affects the safety of crew members, cargo, the marine vehicle itself, and the same within the vicinity of the marine vehicle. Furthermore, maneuverability is an integral component of the transportation efficiency of particular marine vehicles speed and fuel consumption. Because marine vehicles, such as tugboats, move large loads over great distances, they consume thousands of gallons of fuel in any operating year. Thus, by increasing the maneuverability and/or agility fuel consumption can also be decreased.
Presently the majority of tugboats rely on a conventional rudder system with a propulsion system forward of a single rudder or a single flapped rudder that is centered relative to the propulsion system. Many tugboats may have two propulsion systems, each having a single corresponding rudder that is flapped or unflapped. This current configuration has limited maneuverability, side thrust capabilities, and limited versatility as the rudder is large in both length and height relative to the propulsion system. These limitations, and others, limit significant numbers of marine vehicles from operating in shallow waters. These limitations also hinder the maneuverability and fuel efficiency of those marine vehicles.
Applicant believes at least one reason single rudder systems suffer from the aforementioned deficiencies is that in any one turning position a single rudder is only capable of diverting a portion of the jet stream. That is to say, that when the rudder pivots, a significant portion of the output power from the propulsion system (jet stream) will not make contact with the rudder. In turn, the output power from the propulsion system (jet stream) flows past the rudder without being fully utilized for maneuvering purposes. This phenomena explains at least one reason why embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure exhibit significantly higher “lift” relative to the prior art.
While some marine vehicles have a “dual rudder system” with a propulsion system forward of a pair of rudders these rudders each turn symmetrically with respect to one another in any one position. This type of configuration has limited maneuverability, side thrust capabilities, and limited versatility. The present disclosure is directed to a dual differential rudder system in which the rudders turn at different angles relative to one another. That is to say, the present disclosure is directed to navigation systems with two propulsion means, each propulsion means having a pair of rudders that turn at different angles relative to one another. Applicant has discovered, through extensive fluid dynamic testing and modeling, that embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure exhibit significant increases in maneuverability and fuel efficiency.
Applicant believes at least one reason the presently claimed dual differential rudder system is superior to conventional dual rudder systems is that the presently disclosed dual differential rudder system allows each rudder to turn at differential angles relative to one another. For example, when turning hard left the starboard side outermost rudder may turn at 36° while the interior most rudder may turn at 44°. That is to say, that when a dual differential rudder system pivots, each rudder turns at a different angle relative to the central neutral position. This unexpected phenomena explains at least one reason why embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure exhibit significantly higher “lift” relative to the prior art.
The present disclosure addresses one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems associated with conventional steering systems and rudders. The disclosed devices, methods, and systems are directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems of the prior art, namely improving the maneuvering ability, fuel efficiency, and versatility of marine vehicles in navigable waters; particularly in shallow waters with strong currents.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a rudder system for steering a marine vehicle, the rudder system comprising: two or more rudder components operably coupled to two or more bearing assemblies, wherein the bearing assemblies facilitate rotation of the rudder components and the rudder system exhibits lower drag and/or higher lift than a single rudder and/or a single flapped rudder.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a steering system for an existing marine vehicle, the steering system comprising: a retrofit rudder system comprising two or more rudder components coupled to two or more bearing assemblies, wherein the rudder components are chosen from a rudder tube assembly, rudder stocks, and combinations thereof.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method of retro-fitting an existing vessel, such as a method of installing the disclosed steering system which comprising: removing and/or repairing at least a portion of pre-existing rudder system; reusing at least a portion of pre-existing steering system; installing new bearing assemblies and rudder tubes; attaching new rudder stocks and new rudders; and coupling steering control assemblies.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the disclosed embodiments, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate disclosed embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain the disclosed embodiments. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to the disclosed embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. However, a species of a genus may be referred to by the same reference number of the genus when describing the species in further detail.
Referring now to
The hydraulic assemblies 103 and 104 may be fixed to the marine vehicle in a secured center position by a freely rotating connection for symmetrical dispersion of forces. Similarly, the hydraulic assemblies 103 and 104 may be coupled to the control arms 105 and 106 by a freely rotating connection. The control arms 106 and 105 are operable by controlling the hydraulic assemblies 103 and 104 from a steering control room with the assistance of a steering cylinder, hydraulic storage unit, and hydraulic pumps (not illustrated). In this way, the hydraulic assemblies 103 and 104 may apply a controlled steering force against the control arms 106 and 105.
The control arms 106 and 105 may pivot with the assistance of the bearing assemblies 101 and 102 because of the steering force applied by the hydraulic assemblies 103 and 104. Furthermore, the control arms 106 and 105 may pivot together, at least partially, with the assistance of the connecting member bar 111 which may be coupled to the top portions of the control arms 105 and 106 by a freely rotating connection.
For example, the hydraulic assemblies 103, 104 may apply a force against the control arms 105, 106 thereby causing rotation along the rudder bearing assemblies 101, 102. The rudder bearing assemblies 101, 102 may in turn cause the rudder stocks 107, 108 to rotate. The rotation of the rudder stocks 107, 108 may in turn cause the respective rudders to rotate.
Although rudders are not illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment, the new inside bearing assemblies 201, 202 are installed at equal distances from the centerline of a marine vehicle. For example, D2 may be approximately 3′ to 8′ from the centerline of the marine vehicle, such as from 4′ to 6′. In one embodiment, D2 may be a distance on the order of 4′7″ from the centerline of a marine vehicle as may be appropriate for a tugboat. However, it should be understood that D2 may be any distance as may be commensurate with the particular marine vehicle at issue.
New port outside bearing assembly 203 may be installed at a distance D3 from the centerline of a marine vehicle. Similarly, new starboard outside bearing assembly 204 may be installed at a distance D3 from the centerline of a marine vehicle. In the exemplary embodiment, the new outside bearing assemblies 203, 204 may be installed at equal distances from the centerline of a marine vehicle. For example, D3 may be approximately 6′ to 12′ from the centerline of the marine vehicle, such as from 8′ to 10′. In one embodiment, D3 may be a distance on the order of 8′5″ from the centerline of a marine vehicle. In this way, the axis of rotation of each of port side bearing assemblies 203 and 201 may be spaced equidistant from the axis of rotation of port side bearing assembly 101 e.g., 1′7″.
Moreover, distance D3 may be greater than distance D2. However, it should be understood that D2 may be any distance as may be commensurate with the particular marine vehicle at issue. The disclosed dimensions herein are not to be construed as limiting but rather are exemplary. Similarly, the new starboard outside and inside bearing assemblies 204, 202 may be equidistant from the existing starboard side bearing assembly 102. In this way, the axis of rotation of each of starboard side bearing assemblies 202 and 204 may be spaced equidistant from the axis of rotation of port side bearing assembly 101 e.g., 1′7″.
New port outside rudder tube assembly 207 may be installed at a distance D3 from the centerline of a marine vehicle marine vehicle. Similarly, new starboard outside rudder tube assembly 206 may be installed at a distance D3 from the centerline of a marine vehicle. In the exemplary embodiment, the new outside rudder tube assemblies 206, 207 may be installed at equal distances from the centerline of a marine vehicle, such as previously provided. For example, D3 may be a distance on the order of 8′5″ from the centerline of a marine vehicle. Moreover, distance D3 may be greater than distance D2. Further, the new port outside and inside rudder tube assemblies 207, 205 may be equidistant from the existing port side rudder tube assembly 107. Similarly, the new starboard outside and inside rudder tube assemblies 206, 208 may be equidistant from the existing starboard side rudder tube assembly 108.
It should be understood that distances D2 and D3 may be any distance. However, in at least one embodiment distances D2 and D3 are chosen based on the location of the existing bearing assemblies 101, 102 and the existing rudder tube assemblies 107,108. Furthermore, the distances of the outside bearing assemblies 203, 204 and the outside rudder tube assemblies 207, 206 may correspond such that they are operable. Similarly, the distances of the inside bearing assemblies 201, 202 and the inside rudder tube assemblies 205, 208 may correspond such that they are within the same plane and are thus coordinated to be operable with one another.
The connecting element(s) may be coupled such that only substantially lateral forces from the port side control arm 105 may be transferred along the port side upper linkage assembly bar 505. In turn, the lateral forces may be transferred through the port outside bearing assembly 203 by connecting element(s). The port side outside bearing assembly 203 may be coupled to a lower linkage assembly bar 503 by connecting element(s). The port side lower linkage assembly bar 503 may be coupled to the port side outside bearing assembly 203 and the port side inside bearing assembly 201 by connecting elements. The connecting elements may be on opposite ends of the port side lower linkage assembly bar 503 to facilitate transfer of lateral, or at least substantially lateral, forces.
Moreover, the port side lower linkage assembly bar 503 may be greater in length than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of port side outside bearing assembly 203 and the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 201. As illustrated, the upper linkage assembly bar is equal, or substantially equal, in length to the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 201 and the centerline of port side control arm 105, such as from 1′ to 3′. In the exemplary embodiment, this is approximately 1′7″. Because the port side lower linkage assembly bar 503 is greater in length than the distance between the axis of rotation of port side outside bearing assembly 203 and the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 201; and, the upper linkage assembly bar is equal, or substantially equal, in length to the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 201 and the centerline of port side control arm 105 a pair of rudders (not illustrated) will turn at differential angles. Hence, they may be said to be differential.
In at least one embodiment, the connecting elements may be similar to a pin or dowel connection that prevents rotational transfer of forces thereby allowing only substantially lateral force transfer. Therefore, in at least one embodiment, when the port side hydraulic arm 103 applies a force to the port side control arm 105, lateral forces are transferred through the upper and lower linkage assemblies 505 and 503 which in turn cause a rotation of the port side rudder stocks 209, 211 and their corresponding rudders (not illustrated).
A starboard side upper linkage assembly bar 506 may be coupled to a starboard side control arm 106. In the exemplary embodiment of
Moreover, the starboard side lower linkage assembly bar 504 may be greater in length than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side outside bearing assembly 204 and the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 202. As illustrated, the upper linkage assembly bar is equal, or substantially equal, in length to the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 202 and the centerline of starboard side control arm 105. Because the port side lower linkage assembly bar 504 is greater in length than the distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side outside bearing assembly 204 and the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 202; and, the upper linkage assembly bar is equal, or substantially equal, in length to the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 202 and the centerline of starboard side control arm 106 a pair of rudders (not illustrated) will turn at differential angles. Hence, they may be said to be differential.
Additionally, because the port side upper linkage assembly bar projects away from a centerline of a navigable marine vehicle, and the starboard side upper linkage assembly bar 506 projects towards the centerline of a navigable marine vehicle the pair of port side rudders and pair of starboard side rudders (not illustrated) will turn in the same way. Moreover, such a configuration is beneficial when modifying existing steering elements to transition to the disclosed dual differential rudder system.
Moreover, the port side control arm 105, port side linkage assemblies 503, 505, port side bearing assemblies 101, 201, 203, and port side hydraulic arm 103 may substantially complete a port side steering control assembly 21. Likewise, the starboard side control arm 106, starboard side linkage assemblies 504, 506, starboard side bearing assemblies 202, 204, and starboard side hydraulic arm 104 may substantially complete a starboard side steering control assembly 20. The port side and starboard side steering control assemblies 20, 21 may be coupled by a connecting member bar 111 to facilitate symmetrical and even force distribution throughout the steering control assemblies 20 and 21. In at least one embodiment, the steering control assemblies 20, 21 may be a combination of aforementioned elements that may be new, pre-existing, or modified pre-existing elements. In other embodiments, the steering control assemblies 20, 21 may be entirely new original manufacture elements.
In
In
In
In exemplary new construction embodiments, such as those in
Moreover, the port side lower linkage assembly bar 1503 may be greater in length than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of port side outside bearing assembly 1203 and the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 1201. Because the port side lower linkage assembly bar 1503 is greater in length than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of port side outside bearing assembly 1203 and the axis of rotation of port side inside bearing assembly 1201 a pair of rudders (not illustrated) will turn at differential angles. Hence, they may be said to be differential.
In exemplary new construction embodiments, such as those In
Moreover, the starboard side lower linkage assembly bar 1504 may be greater in length than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side outside bearing assembly 1204 and the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 1202. As illustrated, the upper linkage assembly bar is equal, or substantially equal, in length to the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 1202 and the centerline of starboard side control arm 1105. Because the port side lower linkage assembly bar 1504 is greater in length than the distance between the axis of rotation of starboard side outside bearing assembly 1204 and the axis of rotation of starboard side inside bearing assembly 1202 a pair of rudders (not illustrated) will turn at differential angles. Hence, they may be said to be differential.
In
In
As illustrated, port side inner linkage assembly member 606 is shown with a center line projection from the axis of rotation of bearing assembly 201 to the connecting element of the lower linkage assembly bar 503. Moreover, the center line of the port side inner linkage assembly member 606 is offset from the centerline of the inside port side rudder 602 toward the centerline of the navigable marine vehicle, such as from about 10° to 20° or from about 15° to 18°, such as about 16°, i.e., it is angled toward the centerline of the navigable marine vehicle.
As illustrated in
As illustrated, starboard side outer linkage assembly member 608 is shown with a center line projection from the axis of rotation of bearing assembly 204 to the connecting element of the lower linkage assembly bar 504. Moreover, the center line of the starboard side outer linkage assembly member 608 is offset from the centerline of the inside port side rudder 602 away from the centerline of the navigable marine vehicle, such as from about 10° to 20° or from about 15° to 18°, such as about 16°, i.e., it is angled away from the centerline of the navigable marine vehicle.
As illustrated, port side hydraulic arm 103 is extended and applies a force to the port side control arm 105. In turn, lateral forces are transferred through the upper and lower linkage assemblies 505 and 503 which in turn cause a rotation of the outside port side rudder 601 to about 36° from neutral position and the interior port side rudder 602 about 44° from neutral position. Those with skill in the art will appreciate that the outside and interior port side rudders turn at different angles relative to one another because of the offset configuration of linkage assembly members 605, 606 and because the length of lower linkage assembly bar 503 is greater than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of bearing assembly 203 and bearing assembly 201.
As illustrated, starboard side hydraulic arm 104 is retracted and pulls the starboard side control arm 106. In turn, lateral forces are transferred through the upper and lower linkage assemblies 506 and 504 which in turn cause a rotation of the inside starboard side rudder 603 to about 36° from neutral position and the outside port side rudder 604 about 44° from neutral position. Those with skill in the art will appreciate that the outside and interior starboard side rudders turn at different angles relative to one another because of the offset configuration of linkage assembly bar members 607, 608 and because the length of lower linkage assembly bar 503 is greater than the shortest distance between the axis of rotation of bearing assembly 202 and bearing assembly 204.
In this way, the outside port side rudder 601 behaves the same way as the inside starboard side rudder 603. Likewise, the inside port side rudder 602 behaves the same way as the outside starboard side rudder 604.
Table 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment's turning angles of each of rudders 601, 602, 603, and 604 in various turning positions. Those with skill in the art will appreciate the below table represents exemplary angles and similar angles may be provided that are different but still fall within the scope of this disclosure.
In
Next, at step 620 at least a portion of the removed or remaining pre-existing elements may be repaired and or modified as illustrated by
Next, at optional step 630 at least a portion of rudder tubes and bearing assemblies may be coated with a resilient material. The resilient material may prevent corrosion of the rudder tubes and bearing assemblies. Next, at optional step 640 at least a portion of the pre-existing steering equipment may be re-used. For example, the trimmed elements may be removed, cleaned, coated, and reinstalled. Similarly, the control arms and hydraulics and differential linkage may be serviced in place or may be removed and overhauled completely. Next, at step 650 rudder tubes and bearing assemblies may be installed as illustrated in
Next, at step 660 rudder stocks may be installed within the rudder tubes in coordination with the bearing assemblies as illustrated in
In some embodiments, two steering control assemblies interlinked by a connecting member may be installed. The tiller arms may couple at least one set of modified pre-exiting rudder stock and tube to at least one set of new rudder stock and tube as illustrated by
Generally referring to the aforementioned steps, the existing steering cylinder, hydraulic storage unit, hydraulic pumps, and other unnamed ancillary steering equipment may be re-used. For example, the controls in the pilot house, the steering engine etc. may remain substantially unaltered. This aspect is highly advantageous as the method of conversion outlined throughout this disclosure may be performed quickly, efficiently, and in a cost effective manner.
The steering conversion apparatus may impart a superior steering force at all angles, speeds, and propeller RPMS as compared to the prior pre-existing steering apparatus. Furthermore, the modification may require less rudder angle to perform a similar maneuver as compared to the prior steering apparatus. Further still, the steering conversion method may allow for a greater number of rudders than the original configuration. Therefore, the steering conversion method may increase the navigability of a marine vehicle.
In at least one exemplary embodiment, the new rudders may be smaller than the original rudders in length, width, and height. The smaller rudders may allow the marine vehicle to safely navigate shallow waters. Furthermore, smaller rudders may allow the propeller and propeller shaft to be removed without the need to drop the steering rudders. This aspect may reduce down time and shipyard costs over the life of a marine vehicle.
In.
The exemplary single flapped rudder system 1 may consist of a pre-existing propeller 99, pre-existing rudder 200, and pre-existing port rudder stock 107 (see
In
The exemplary dual rudder system 2 may consist of a pre-existing propeller 99 and a pair of rudders 601, 602 that are coupled to a pair of rudder stocks 209, 211. Moreover, the exemplary dual rudder system 2 may utilize a portion of pre-existing parts such as the pre-existing steering controls and hydraulics. As illustrated in
Referring to the figures generally, it should be understood that distances and spatial relationships may be modified without deviating from the contemplated scope of this disclosure. For example, a first marine vehicle may call for the installation of rudder tubes and rudder stock at an equidistant location from pre-existing rudder tubes whereas a second marine vehicle may call for the installation of rudder tubes and stock at differing distances and locations from pre-existing rudder tubes. Further still, a third marine vehicle may call for the addition of a single rudder tube, stock, and bearing assembly for use in coordination with the existing equipment. Some of the reasons these alternate arrangements may be necessitated are pre-existing field conditions, limited space, and the rearward hull geometry. Therefore, this disclosure contemplates multiple arrangements, configurations, and uses.
As show by
While illustrative embodiments have been described herein, the scope includes any and all embodiments having equivalent elements, modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations or alterations based on the present disclosure. The elements in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based on the language employed in the claims and not limited to examples described in the present specification or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive. It is intended, therefore, that the specification and examples be considered as example only, with a true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims and their full scope of equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Application No. 62/475,408, filed Mar. 23, 2017, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2276163 | Coolidge | Mar 1942 | A |
2916005 | Parsons | Dec 1959 | A |
3101693 | Schilling | Aug 1963 | A |
3872817 | Duryea | Mar 1975 | A |
4421489 | Van Veldhuizen | Dec 1983 | A |
5445100 | Finkl | Aug 1995 | A |
20170081010 | Kuribayashi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180273153 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62475408 | Mar 2017 | US |