The chemical dispensing insert business is an approximately $50 million market in North America. Most large janitorial chemical companies use closed loop inserts with their chemical bottles. In North America, inserts fitting into 38 mm bottles are most common in the janitorial cleaning industry. Competitors like RD Industries, Inc., Dema Engineering Company, Hydro Systems, Inc., and Pops all produce their own version of an insert. One such insert is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,988,456, which is herein expressly incorporated by reference, in its entirety.
Dispensing systems typically have two different operating flow rate modes. One is a bucket fill mode wherein the flow rate is about 3 to 4 gallon per minute (gpm). The other is a bottle fill mode, wherein the flow rate is about 1 gpm. At each of these two different flow rates, the vacuum pull from the tube in the chemical container is different, as should be apparent to those skilled in the art. Also, the chemical to water ratio differs due to the vacuum and water flow differences. The standard closed loop system does not compensate for the two different flow rates and the different dilutions. Currently, chemical companies have to accept that the water dilution ratio for each of the bucket fill and bottle fill dispensing modes necessarily differ. Ideally though, whether in the dispensing bucket fill mode or the bottle fill mode, the water to chemical ratio should be the same. A state of the art way to achieve a more constant water to chemical ratio in each of the above discussed operating modes is by using a dual straw insert.
The present invention achieves the foregoing objective of a consistent water to chemical ratio in each of the two described operating modes by implementing a closed loop insert comprising a single straw, dual dilution rate closed loop insert.
The closed loop insert of the present invention is installed at the packaging level and is recessed into the neck of the container so that it does not interfere with the bottle cap or the dispensing unit to which it might be attached. The closed loop insert sits inside the chemical bottle and forms a no spill seal on the neck of the bottle to prevent spills or leaks during its transport, storage, and use of the chemical container. The closed loop engages with a mating cap adapter or chemical dispenser that keys up to a closed insert to allow the dilution dispenser to draw chemical out of the container through the use of a vacuum pressure. The dual dilution rate closed loop insert of the invention has two different metering tip sizes that fit inside a single straw closed loop insert. Depending on the vacuum pressure that is created by the respective 1 gpm or 3-4 gpm operating modes, the diaphragm opens and selects one of the two metering tip holes. The closed loop is disposed at the 3-4 gpm metering tip hole in a default position. When dispensing at a 1 gpm flow rate, a higher vacuum suction is achieved, which activates the diaphragm to expose the metering tip hole for the 1 gpm flow rate. The metering tip sizes are calculated depending on the viscosity of the chemical being vacuumed. By doing this, the user is enabled to get the same chemical to water dilution rate whether dispensing for bottle fill (1 gpm) or bucket fill (3 to 4 gpm).
Key components of the inventive system are chemically resistant plastic materials, diaphragms and springs.
More particularly, in one aspect of the invention there is disclosed an exemplary embodiment of a dual dilution rate chemical bottle insert for dispensing chemical fluid stored in a bottle at multiple selected dilution rates, wherein the insert comprises an insert body, a tube extending out of the insert body, a metering poppet disposed in the insert body, a first larger fluid flow hole disposed in the metering poppet for dispensing a first greater volume of fluid through the tube, and a second smaller fluid flow hole disposed in the metering poppet for dispensing a second lesser volume of fluid through the tube. The metering poppet is movable between a first orientation wherein the first larger fluid flow hole is exposed for permitting chemical fluid flow therethrough and a second orientation wherein the second smaller fluid flow hole is exposed for permitting chemical fluid flow therethrough. The second smaller fluid flow hole is covered when the metering poppet is in the first orientation and the first larger fluid flow hole is covered when the metering poppet is in the second orientation. The metering poppet moves between the first and second orientations responsive to applied vacuum pressure levels.
A diaphragm is disposed in the insert body, and is movable with the metering poppet between the first and second orientations. A poppet spring is provided, which is biased to return the metering poppet to a closed orientation when chemical dispensing is not desired. A check valve is disposed in the insert. A cap is engageable with an opening in the bottle, wherein engagement of the cap with the bottle opening moves the check valve to an open orientation to permit flow of chemical from the bottle.
A piston having a piston outlet hole is disposed in the insert, wherein movement of the check valve to the open orientation by the cap opens the piston outlet hole to permit dispensing of the chemical.
In operation, a first applied vacuum pressure moves the diaphragm to thereby move the metering poppet to expose one of the two fluid flow holes and a second applied vacuum pressure moves the diaphragm to thereby move the metering poppet to expose the other of the two fluid flow holes. The lower of the first and second applied vacuum pressures moves the metering poppet to expose the smaller of the two fluid flow holes, and the higher of the first and second applied vacuum pressures moves the metering poppet to expose the larger of the two fluid flow holes.
In one disclosed exemplary embodiment, the check valve comprises an umbrella valve, while in another disclosed exemplary embodiment, the check valve comprises a ball valve. The first larger fluid flow hole permits a diluted fluid flow of about 3-4 gpm and the second smaller fluid flow hole permits a diluted fluid flow of about 1 gpm.
In another aspect of the invention, a method for changing the flow rate of a chemical fluid from a chemical reservoir without changing an insert or dispensing flow tube disposed in the chemical reservoir is disclosed. Method steps include first applying a first vacuum pressure level to a metering device in the insert to expose a first fluid metering hole in the metering device and thereby dispense a first flow rate of the chemical fluid from the chemical reservoir. Then, to change fluid flow without removing or changing the insert, a further step is performed which comprises applying a second different vacuum pressure level to the metering device in the insert, wherein the second different vacuum pressure level exposes a second fluid metering hole in the metering device which is differently sized than the first fluid metering hole to thereby dispense a second flow rate of the chemical fluid from the chemical reservoir, the second flow rate being different than the first flow rate. The step of applying the second different vacuum pressure level comprises moving a diaphragm and an associate metering poppet, the movement of the metering poppet covering the first fluid metering hole and uncovering the second fluid metering hole, responsive to movement of the diaphragm.
The invention, together with additional features and advantages thereof, may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying illustrative drawings. In these accompanying drawings, like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures.
The closed loop insert system has been around for years and been proven to work effectively using vacuum to evacuate liquids from the container to the chemical dispensing equipment. However, the closed loop insert systems available in the market comprise a single straw and a single size metering tip. Most of the time, this single straw is utilized for both the low (bottle) flow fill rate (approximately 1 gpm) and for the high (bucket) flow fill rate (3-4 gpm), which, as discussed above, is a compromise resulting in inaccurate and inconsistent actual flow rates in each flow mode, with too much or too little chemical being used for the two different flow rates. This translates into poor results or a waste of chemical. As also discussed above, sometimes, where accurate flow rates in each flow mode are particularly important or desirable, a two straw system is employed, with a different metering tip in each of the two straws. This dual straw design requires specific chemical dilution dispensers to interface with the dual straw design. This requires the customer/user to change its whole chemical dispensing program, which can be very costly and complex.
The present invention is unique and improved because it employs two differently sized metering tip holes in a single straw, allowing for chemical dilution dispensers to deliver the same chemical-to-water ratio for both identified flow rates. This works based on the application of a pressure differential on a rubber diaphragm, as will be described below. The metering tip holes are chosen based on the vacuum achieved by the selected flow rate, which activates a diaphragm that opens the particular metering tip hole for that selected flow rate. What makes the design unique is that the dual metering tip is designed into a single straw that is able to fit and interface with the majority of chemical dilution dispensers and mating caps used in the industry. This allows users to employ the inventive design without changing up their entire existing dispensing dilution program. The inventive dual dilution rate closed loop in a single straw design enables the user to obtain the correct flow rate of chemical and still be able to use their existing chemical dilution dispensers utilizing a single straw closed loop insert.
The insert locks the chemical into the container to prevent leaks and spills throughout the product life cycle—from shipping to storage to use to disposal. After the chemical is consumed, the bottle with the insert is discarded or recycled. This makes it the “razor blade” of the chemical proportioning market.
Now, with more particular reference to the drawings, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described in greater detail.
In
The
A second exemplary embodiment of the insert system 20 of the present invention is shown in
In
Although, as noted above, there are some relatively minor structural differences between the embodiments of
Operationally, as in the first embodiment, the piston outlet hole 36 is closed (covered) by the ball-type check valve 26 when the insert is 20 in a closed position. This is the storage orientation for the bottle 10 with the insert installed therein.
When the cap 18 is installed, it pushes the ball-type check valve 26 downwardly, thereby compressing the sliding valve spring 28, consequently exposing the outlet hole 36 of the piston. In this orientation, which is the default position or high flow position, a larger hole 46 on the poppet 30 is exposed for chemical to pass through. A second smaller hole 48 on the poppet 30 is covered in this orientation and not accessible to fluid flow.
At a higher vacuum (e.g. 23 Hg and above), the diaphragm 34 and metering poppet 30 are pulled upwardly to an “up” position, thereby compressing the poppet spring and thus exposing the smaller poppet hole 48 for chemical to flow through and covering the larger poppet hole 46. Depending upon the applied vacuum pressure, the diaphragm and metering poppet move upwardly or downwardly to expose the proper metering hole 46, 48 for chemical flow-through. When dispensing of the chemical is completed, the poppet spring 33 is biased to push the diaphragm 34 and metering poppet 30 back to their default position.
Accordingly, although an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that all the terms used herein are descriptive rather than limiting, and that many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made by one having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/056,333, entitled Dual Dilution Rate Closed Loop Insert and filed on Aug. 6, 2018, currently allowed, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the filing date of Provisional U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/546,849, entitled Dual Dilution Rate Closed Loop Insert, and filed on Aug. 17, 2017. Both of these prior applications are herein expressly incorporated by reference, in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1211636 | Spray | Jan 1917 | A |
1379904 | Derby | May 1921 | A |
2071204 | Hunt | Feb 1937 | A |
2612841 | Lasley | Oct 1952 | A |
2780533 | Braunlich | Feb 1957 | A |
2788244 | Gilmour | Apr 1957 | A |
3285282 | Martin | Nov 1966 | A |
3425664 | Niskin | Feb 1969 | A |
3642249 | Cruse | Feb 1972 | A |
3752183 | Griswold | Aug 1973 | A |
4546959 | Tanno | Oct 1985 | A |
4579143 | Rollins | Apr 1986 | A |
4809740 | Nevlud | Mar 1989 | A |
4901976 | Smith | Feb 1990 | A |
5054516 | Okerblom | Oct 1991 | A |
5988456 | Laible | Nov 1999 | A |
6142345 | Laible | Nov 2000 | A |
6311718 | Hafner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6669062 | Laible | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6968983 | Laible | Nov 2005 | B2 |
8083107 | Laible | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8313085 | Dempsey | Nov 2012 | B2 |
D682103 | Jedlicka et al. | May 2013 | S |
8557126 | Futch | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8820587 | Imai | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844776 | Haas | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9126725 | Laible | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9192949 | Lang et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9242847 | Laible | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9458003 | Laible | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9469452 | Schultz, Jr. et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10336517 | Laible | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10414644 | Laible | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10508016 | Laible | Dec 2019 | B1 |
20030056841 | Dalhart et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050101939 | Mitchell | May 2005 | A1 |
20050247901 | Wang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20130037575 | van der Molen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130263649 | Storch | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20170297788 | Defert | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62546849 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16056333 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 17033547 | US |